Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Resectable”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Chromogranin A, a marker of the therapeutic success of resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases: preliminary report.

Recent publications indicate that life may be prolonged by surgical debulking of neuroendocrine tumors. A minimum 90% reduction of liver metastases has been suggested to alleviate symptoms of the carcinoid. We have used the tumor marker chromogranin A (CgA) to assess hepatic resection in patients with neuroendocrine metastatic tumor disease. Since 1998, seven patients (3 men) of median age 73 years (range 64-84 years) with carcinoid primary tumors in the ileum who had solitary (n = 2) or multiple (n = 5) liver metastases underwent hepatic resections. Two patients had synchronous small intestinal and liver resections; the rest had deferred hepatic resections after intestinal resection. Hormonal manifestations in the form of loose stools or diarrhea or flushing were observed in five patients, and five had abdominal symptoms from partial obstruction of the small bowel. The resection was deemed radical in five patients. Two patients with non-radical resection needed postoperative octreotide treatment, and symptoms were alleviated or improved in the others. All seven patients are alive with an observation period from 6 to 64 months (median 36 months). Median CgA (normal < 30 ng/ml) was 292 ng/ml (range 79-14,000 ng/ml) before liver surgery. Postoperatively, CgA became normal in three of the radically resected patients, whereas in two others, it decreased to a lowest median level of 79 ng/ml (range 52-105 ng/ml). In two palliatively resected patients, one had a near normalization to 65 ng/ml, and the last patient had a reduction from 14,000 to 2400 ng/ml following debulking surgery. A similar postoperative reduction was noted for 24 hr urinary 5-HIAA excretion. Postoperative octreotide scintigraphy suggested residual hepatic or extrahepatic tumors in three of the patients thought radically resected, whereas two had no clear sign of disease corresponding to a normal CgA value. The CgA values, however, reflected the extent of positive scintigraphy findings. Serum CgA levels monitored the extent and short-term course of the disease and corresponded well with scintigraphy findings and 5-HIAA excretion, but prolonged follow-up in more patients may be necessary before decisive conclusions are allowed to be drawn.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Are there indications for palliative resection in pancreatic cancer?

Controversy exists about the indication for a palliative pancreatoduodenectomy. A palliative resection for patients with a pancreatic carcinoma can be performed safely nowadays with low mortality and acceptable morbidity in centers with experience. The early results in terms of mortality and morbidity are not different from resections with curative intent or even after bypass surgery. The procedure seems effective for controlling symptoms of the disease, and the quality of life after a palliative resection is acceptable and not worse than after bypass surgery. It is, however, still doubtful whether the incidence of symptom recurrence, such as jaundice, obstruction, and pain, is lower after resection than after bypass surgery. The longer survival after palliative resection could also be due to patient selection and postoperative treatment. There are no randomized trials to prove the superiority of palliative resection over bypass surgery. The safety of pancreatic resection for cancer has already changed the policy in centers with experience, and surgeons are more willing to perform a resection because the results are better or at least the same as after bypass surgery. There are, however, no results to confirm that a palliative resection should be performed routinely or to justify resection as a debulking procedure.

Gastric Outlet Obstruction↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional technique in colonic and liver resection in a tumor-bearing small animal model.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procedures in oncological surgery are either done in curative or palliative intent. We present two experiments comparing laparoscopic to conventional surgery in the curative and palliative setting regarding short-term (stress and immune alteration) and long-term aspects (survival time and recurrence rate). METHODS: We established two syngenic tumor-bearing small animal models for curative liver resection (Morris hepatoma 3924A, ACI rats) and palliative colon resection (BSp73 ASML, BOX rats). Male rats were operated on, performing laparoscopic and conventional liver resection as well as laparoscopic and conventional colon resection; control groups (anesthesia) were included. The following parameters of the stress and immune system were measured: corticosterone, neopterine, Il-1-b, Il-6, and body weight as a parameter of postoperative recovery. Analyzed long-term parameters were survival time, tumor weight, and recurrence rate (histology). RESULTS: After colon resection, analysis of variance showed significant differences in all short-term parameters, including body weight after laparoscopic versus conventional colon resection (p <0.05). In the case of laparoscopic versus conventional liver resection, only Il-6 showed globally statistically significant differences for the short-term parameters (p = 0.05). Long-term parameters were not significantly different between the laparoscopic and conventional groups, regardless of the type of resection (colon or liver) or the operative setting (curative or palliative). However, there were differences after curative liver resection compared to the control group (anesthesia alone). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the type of intraabdominal operation (colon or liver) may influence the degree of trauma of an operation more than the type of technique (laparoscopic or open). The perioperative alteration of stress and immune function has no implications on the long-term results, such as survival time or recurrence, neither in the curative nor in the palliative setting. The thesis that laparoscopic surgery results in less pain, which in turn means less stress and less alteration of the immune system and therefore results in a lower rate of postoperative metastasis is only valid for laparoscopic colonic resection in our model. The part of the thesis that states that fewer metastases should occur after laparoscopic oncological surgery cannot be confirmed in our study.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Surgical treatment for metastatic malignancies. Anatomical resection of liver metastasis: indications and outcomes.

Hepatectomy may be the only treatment modality for the cure of colorectal liver metastasis. However, whether to perform nonanatomical resection or anatomical resection remains unclear. Original articles in English on liver metastasis, including reports that dealt with case series of more than 50 curative hepatectomies, were reviewed, and the current status of surgical treatment for colorectal liver metastasis was summarized, with a special emphasis on the relevance, indications, and outcomes of anatomical hepatectomy. Anatomical hepatic resection was performed in 63% of the patients. For patients who were treated by curative hepatectomy, including both anatomical and nonanatomical resection, the morbidity rates, mortality rates, 5-year survival rates, and rates of hepatic recurrence were 23%, 3.3%, 34%, and 41.2%, respectively. In 73 articles that each analyzed more than 50 patients treated with potentially curative hepatectomy, the incidence of anatomical resection exceeded 50% in 56 series, while anatomical resection was performed in fewer than 50% of the patients in 17 series. A comparison between these two groups naturally revealed a remarkable difference in the incidence of anatomical resection (72% versus 34%), but no difference in terms of morbidity; mortality; survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years; or rate of hepatic recurrence. The profile of liver metastasis related to prognosis was generally advantageous to patients treated with nonanatomical resection, and this may have nullified the survival advantage of anatomical hepatectomy over nonanatomical resection. Anatomical resection provides a higher probability of coresecting microscopic invasions that are predictable but undetectable, and can be recommended as a standard procedure for locally advanced metastatic liver cancer.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of multivisceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to clarify the characteristics of multivisceral resection and to discuss strategies for improving the overall outcome of multivisceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: The study included 323 patients who electively underwent curative surgery for pT3-pT4 colorectal carcinoma without distant metastasis. We evaluated the short-term and long-term outcome of multivisceral resection relative to that of the standard operation by means of multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 323 patients, 53 (16.4 percent) received multivisceral resection because of adhesion to other organs. Multivisceral resection was significantly associated with tumor size, depth of invasion, operative blood loss, operation time, and blood transfusion (all: P < 0.0001). Overall morbidity rates were 49.1 percent after multivisceral resection vs. 17.8 percent after the standard operation (P < 0.0001), and postoperative mortality rate was 0 percent in both groups (not significant). Only multivisceral resection (odds ratio, 2.725; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.125-6.623; P = 0.0264) was an independent factor for overall postoperative complications. The survival rate of patients after multivisceral resection was similar to that after the standard operation (5-year rate, 76.6 percent vs. 79.5 percent, P = 0.9347). Lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.510; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.460-4.315; P = 0.0009) and blood transfusion (hazard ratio, 2.353; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.185-4.651; P = 0.0145) were independently associated with patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: For locally advanced colorectal cancer, the long-term outcome after multivisceral resection is comparable to that after the standard operation. However, it should be recognized that multivisceral resection is associated with higher postoperative morbidity. In addition, a reduction in the incidence of blood transfusion may contribute to improving patient survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Operative salvage for locoregional recurrent colon cancer after curative resection: an analysis of 100 cases.

PURPOSE: Locoregional recurrence after resection of colon carcinoma is an uncommon and difficult clinical problem. Outcome data to guide surgical management are limited. This investigation was undertaken to review our experience with surgical resection for patients with locoregional recurrence colon cancer, determine predictors of respectability, and define prognostic factors associated with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was queried for patients who had recurrent colon cancer between January 1991 and October 2002. Patients were selected for analysis if they had either isolated resectable locoregional recurrence or concomitant resectable distant disease. Disease-specific survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier actuarial method, and factors associated with outcome were determined by the log-rank test and Cox regression. RESULTS: During this period of time, 744 patients with recurrent colon cancer were identified and 100 (13.4 percent) underwent exploration with curative intent for potentially resectable locoregional recurrence: 75 with isolated locoregional recurrence, and 25 with locoregional recurrence and resectable distant disease. The median follow-up for survivors was 27 months. Locoregional recurrence was classified into four categories: anastomotic; mesenteric/nodal; retroperitoneal; and peritoneal. Median survival for all patients was 30 months. Fifty-six patients had an R0 resection (including distant sites). Factors associated with prolonged disease-specific survival included R0 resection (P < 0.001); age <60 years (P < 0.01); early stage of primary disease (P = 0.05); and no associated distant disease (P = 0.03). Poor prognostic factors included more than one site of recurrence (P = 0.05) and involvement of the mesentery/nodal basin (P = 0.03). The ability to obtain an R0 resection was the strongest predictor of outcome, and these patients had a median survival of 66 months. CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence colon cancer is appropriate for select patients. Complete resection is critical to long-term survival and is associated with a single site of recurrence, perianastomotic disease, low presalvage carcinembryonic antigen level, and absence of distant disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Segmental resection or subtotal colectomy in Crohn's colitis?

PURPOSE: Segmental resection for Crohn's colitis is controversial. Compared with subtotal colectomy, segmental resection is reported to be associated with a higher rate of re-resection. Few studies address this issue, and postoperative functional outcome has not been reported previously. This study compared segmental resection to subtotal colectomy with anastomosis with regard to re-resection, postoperative symptoms, and anorectal function. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients operated on between 1970 and 1997 with segmental resection (n = 31) or subtotal colectomy (n = 26) were included. Reoperative procedures were analyzed by a life-table technique. Segmentally resected patients were also compared separately with a subgroup of subtotally colectomized patients (n = 12) with similarly limited colonic involvement. Symptoms were assessed according to Best's modified Crohn's Disease Activity Index and an anorectal function score. RESULTS: The re-resection rate did not differ between groups in either the entire study population (P = 0.46) or the subgroup of patients with comparable colonic involvement (P = 0.78). Segmentally resected patients had fewer symptoms (P = 0.039), fewer loose stools (P = 0.002), and better anorectal function (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed the number of colonic segments removed to be the strongest predictive factor for postoperative symptoms and anorectal function (P = 0.026 and P = 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSION: Segmental resection should be considered in limited Crohn's colitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Pelvic exenteration and sacral resection for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The only possibility of a surgical cure in patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer would be an extended resection such as pelvic exenteration and sacral resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and survival benefits of these procedures. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1999, 64 patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer underwent abdominoperineal resection, with sacral resection in 9 patients, anterior pelvic exenteration in 8 patients, total pelvic exenteration in 27 patients, and total pelvic exenteration with sacral resection in 20 patients. RESULTS: Rates of morbidity, reoperation, and mortality were 50, 4.5, and 0 percent in 22 patients with primary cancer, and 60, 2.4, and 2.4 percent in 42 patients with recurrent disease, respectively. Major complications, such as sepsis, intra-abdominal abscess, and enteric fistula caused one hospital death and reoperation in two patients. In 21 patients who underwent curative resection for primary cancer, the overall five-year survival rates were 74.1 percent for Dukes B and 47.4 percent for Dukes C, although the difference was not statistically significant. Thirty patients with recurrent cancer who underwent curative resection had significantly improved survival, with a five-year survival rate of 22.9 percent, compared with 12 patients who underwent palliative resection, resulting in a survival rate of 0 percent (P = 0.0065). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic exenteration and sacral resection for primary or recurrent rectal cancer are tolerable procedures with a low mortality rate. Although they provide a survival benefit if curative resection is possible, the associated morbidity remains high and should be followed up closely.

Female↗
PubMed2006

Abdominoperineal excision with partial anterior en bloc resection in multimodal management of low rectal cancer: a strategy to reduce local recurrence.

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard in the performance of an abdominoperineal resection but little has changed in the way the perineal operation is performed. A frequent problem is anterior dissection. The aim of this study was to present the results of abdominoperineal resection using selected partial anterior en bloc resection to reduce recurrence. METHODS: The data were population-based and prospectively registered. Two experienced surgeons performed the operations. In selected cases, depending on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings, parts of the vagina or prostate close to the tumor were resected. All specimens were examined according to Quirke. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients underwent abdominoperineal resection with total mesorectal excision; 56 received preoperative radiotherapy. The tumors involved the anterior bowel wall in 40 cases and in 23 (58 percent) of them, en bloc resections were performed. The distance from the tumor to the conventional resection margin (without en bloc resection) was 0 mm in ten cases. The median follow-up period was 37 months. So far, one (1.7 percent) local recurrence has been detected in 58 (92 percent) curative and indeterminate cases. The cancer-specific five-year survival in these cases was 87 percent (Kaplan-Meier). CONCLUSION: A multimodal management regimen in patients with low rectal cancer, including preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection with a high frequency of partial en bloc resection of the vagina or prostate, resulted in excellent local control and survival. In some male patients, excenteration with urinary stoma can be avoided.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2006

Sacral resection for recurrent rectal cancer: analysis of morbidity and treatment results.

PURPOSE: Composite sacropelvic resection for locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer is a high-risk procedure that benefits select patients. We reviewed our recent institutional experience to evaluate case selection, morbidity, and outcomes. METHODS: Between 1987 and 2004, 29 patients underwent composite resection for recurrent locoregional rectal cancer (17 females; median age, 60 years). Clinicopathologic indicators were evaluated as indicators of survival by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 29 total patients, 27 (93 percent) received radiotherapy with their previous surgery (n = 10; 34 percent) or before sacrectomy (n = 17; 59 percent), and 12 (41 percent) received intraoperative therapy. Sacral resections were performed at S2/S3 (55 percent) or S4/S5 (45 percent) using anterior (41 percent) or combined anterior-posterior approach (59 percent), with adherence to (62 percent) or cortical invasion in (38 percent) the sacrum. A majority of those who had undergone previous abdominoperineal resection had total exenteration (9/13), whereas most patients who had undergone a previous sphincter-preserving procedure had abdominoperineal resection (12/16) and none had exenteration. Pedicle flaps (omental, 11; abdominal rectus, 7) often were used. A median of five (range, 1-33) units of blood was given intraoperatively. Transfusions were associated with previous abdominoperineal resection (P < 0.03), correlating strongly with postoperative morbidity (P < 0.02). There were 33 complications in 17 (59 percent) patients, most commonly perineal wound breakdown (9 (31 percent)) and pelvic abscess (5 (17 percent)). Median hospital stay was 18 (range, 7-56) days, significantly longer in patients with previous abdominoperineal resection (P < 0.02) or postoperative morbidity (P < 0.03). The only postoperative death was from pelvic sepsis. Resection was complete (R0) in 18 patients (62 percent), with microscopically positive margins (R1) in 10 (34 percent) and grossly positive margins (R2) in 1 (3 percent). Two-year and five-year recurrence rates were 47 and 85 percent, respectively; disease-specific survival was 63 and 20 percent, respectively. Less transfusion (P = 0.03), R0 resection (P = 0.005), lack of anterior organ involvement (P = 0.02), and absence of cortical bone invasion (P < 0.001) were associated with better survival on univariate analysis; original colorectal cancer stage was not. CONCLUSIONS: Sacrectomy for rectal cancer is a high-risk procedure that can achieve clear resection margins with low mortality in select patients. This procedure has a low cure rate but may provide local disease control with acceptable morbidity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and oncologic and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. METHODS: A feasibility study was performed using 213 specimens from abdominoperineal resections of rectal cancer. Oncologic and functional outcomes were investigated in 228 patients with rectal cancer located <5 cm from the anal verge who underwent intersphincteric resection at seven institutions in Japan between 1995 and 2004. RESULTS: Curative operations were accomplished by intersphincteric resection in 86 percent of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection. Complete microscopic curative surgery was achieved by intersphincteric resection in 225 of 228 patients. Morbidity was 24 percent, and mortality was 0.4 percent. During the median observation time of 41 months, rate of local recurrence was 5.8 percent at three years, and five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 91.9 percent and 83.2 percent, respectively. In 181 patients who received stoma closure, 68 percent displayed good continence, and only 7 percent showed worsened continence at 24 months after stoma closure. Patients with total intersphincteric resection displayed significantly worse continence than patients with partial or subtotal resection. CONCLUSIONS: Curability with intersphincteric resection was verified histologically, and acceptable oncologic and functional outcomes were obtained by using these procedures in patients with very low rectal cancer. However, information on potential functional adverse effects after intersphincteric resection should be provided to patients preoperatively.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Five-year survival following hepatic resection after neoadjuvant therapy for nonresectable colorectal.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the most effective treatment for colorectal liver metastases but only a minority of patients are candidates for a potentially curative resection. Our experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection and five years survival analysis of the patients treated is presented. METHODS: Between February of 1988 and September of 1996, 701 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Four categories of nonresectable disease were defined: large size, ill location, multinodularity, and extrahepatic disease. Liver resection was performed in those patients whose disease became resectable. After resection, the patients were followed up every 3 months. A 5-year survival analysis by the different categories described was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (13.5%) were found to be resectable on reevaluation and underwent a potentially curative resection. There was no perioperative mortality, and the complication rate was 23%. As of December of 1999, 87 patients have completed 5 years of follow-up. The overall 5-year survival is 35% from the time of resection and 39% from the onset of chemotherapy. Respective 5-year survival rates are 60% for large tumors, 49% for ill-located lesions, 34% for multinodular disease, and 18% for liver metastases with extrahepatic disease. In this latter category, however, a 35% 5-year survival was found when all the patients with extrahepatic disease were analyzed rather than only those for whom extrahepatic disease was the main cause of nonresectability. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy enables liver resection in some patients with initially unresectable colorectal metastases. Long-term survival is similar to that reported for a priori surgical candidates.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Resection of pulmonary metastases from uterine sarcomas.

Long-term survival following resection of pulmonary metastases has been well documented. Variables that are believed to have an effect on survival are site of primary tumor, number and size of metastases, resectability, laterality of the metastases, doubling time, and disease-free interval. Published information regarding resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with gynecologic primary tumors is limited. We reviewed 45 patients whose pulmonary metastases from uterine sarcomas were resected at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1960 and 1989. All cases met carefully defined criteria at time of thoracotomy: prior hysterectomy for uterine sarcoma, no extrathoracic tumor, known disease thought to be resectable, histology consistent with uterine sarcoma, and no medical contraindication to thoracotomy. Seventy-one percent had unilateral lesions, fifty-one percent had one lesion, and seventy percent had nodules greater than 2 cm. Thirty-six percent had incomplete resection at thoracotomy. Actuarial 5- and 10-year survival from hysterectomy for uterine sarcoma was 65 and 50%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 89 months. Five- and ten-year survival from resection of pulmonary metastases was 43 and 35%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 25 months. Unilateral vs bilateral disease was a significant predictor of survival after pulmonary resection (P = 0.02). Metastases size, number of metastases, disease-free interval, and patient age were not significant. Among this carefully selected group of patients undergoing resection of pulmonary metastases from uterine sarcomas, long-term survival was achieved by a substantial proportion of patients. No single risk factor is sufficiently accurate to exclude an individual patient from consideration for pulmonary resection.

Female↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic mucosal resection as a staging technique to determine the depth of invasion of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ablation and vagal-sparing esophagectomy offer the potential for reduced morbidity in patients with high-grade dysplasia or early esophageal adenocarcinoma, but neither includes a lymphadenectomy. Although adequate for intramucosal tumors, both are potentially inadequate for patients with submucosal tumor invasion given the high prevalence of nodal metastases with these lesions. Currently there is no test including endoscopic ultrasound that can accurately determine whether a small tumor is confined to the mucosa or has penetrated into the submucosa. The aim of this study was to compare the pathologic depth of invasion by endoscopic mucosal resection with findings and outcome after surgical resection to assess the accuracy and reliability of endoscopic mucosal resection for staging early esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From 2001 to 2003, 7 patients presented with small, endoscopically visible adenocarcinomas. All underwent endoscopic mucosal resection followed by surgical resection. RESULTS: Analysis of the resected specimens confirmed that the endoscopic mucosal resection had accurately determined the depth of tumor invasion in all patients, and had completely excised the lesion in all but 1 patient (86%). Lymph node dissection was included as part of the resection in 2 patients with submucosal invasion by endoscopic mucosal resection, and a vagal-sparing esophagectomy was used in the 5 patients with only intramucosal tumors. All patients are alive and disease-free at a median follow-up of 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection accurately determines the depth of tumor invasion, and should be used as a staging procedure in patients with early esophageal cancer when therapies that do not include a lymphadenectomy are considered.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Locally recurrent esophageal carcinoma: when is re-resection indicated?

BACKGROUND: Limited locally recurrent esophageal carcinoma is rare, and little is known regarding effectiveness of re-resection. METHODS: Medical records of 27 consecutive patients with locally recurrent esophageal carcinoma who underwent reoperation at our institution between February 1974 and January 2003 were analyzed. RESULTS: The original and recurrent cancer cell types were identical in all patients. Median disease-free interval was 19.4 months (range, 2.5 to 170 months). Recurrence was at the anastomosis in 23 patients (85%), esophageal remnant in 3 (11%), and stomach in 1 (4%). Ten patients had completion gastrectomy and partial esophagectomy, and 9 had resection of the anastomosis. The remaining 8 patients were found intraoperatively to have unresectable disease and underwent biopsy only. Re-resection was complete in 15 of the 19 patients resected (79%). Four patients had microscopic cancer at the resection margins. Reconstruction was with colon in 10 patients and esophagogastrostomy in 9. There were 2 deaths (operative mortality, 7%). Complications occurred in 16 patients (59%). Arrhythmia and anastomotic leak were the most common complications and each occurred in 7 patients (26%). Factors favorably associated with survival were disease-free interval greater than 2 years (p < or = 0.05) and complete re-resection (p < or = 0.02). Two-, three-, and five-year survival for patients completely re-resected was 62%, 44%, and 35%, respectively. Survival for patients who had incomplete re-resections was 18% at 2 years and zero at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Re-resection of locally recurrent esophageal carcinoma is associated with considerable morbidity. However, long-term survival is possible in patients with a long disease-free interval or a complete re-resection.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Lung resection for bronchogenic carcinoma after pneumonectomy: a safe and worthwhile procedure.

OBJECTIVES: Patients treated surgically for lung cancer can develop either a metachronous cancer or a recurrence. The appearance of a new cancer on the remaining lung after a pneumonectomy poses unique treatment problems, and surgery is often considered contraindicated. We report on the outcome of resections for lung cancer after pneumonectomy performed for lung cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients who underwent a resection of bronchogenic carcinoma on the remaining lung from 1990 to 2002. RESULTS: There were 14 patients (13 males and 1 female) with a median age of 64 years (range 51-74). Median preoperative Fev1 was 1.45 (range 1.35-2.23), corresponding to 59% of predicted Fev1 (range 46-80%). Resection was performed between 11 and 264 months after pneumonectomy (median 35.5). The resections performed were: one wedge resection in 11 patients, two wedge resections in two patients and two segmentectomies in two other patients; one patient underwent a third resection. Diagnosis was metachronous cancer in 12 patients and metastasis in two patients. Complications occurred in three patients (21%), while operative mortality was nil. Mean hospital stay was 10.5 days (6-25). Two patients received chemotherapy (one after local recurrence, one after the third resection). Overall 1, 3 and 5 year survivals were 57, 46 and 30%, respectively (median 21 months). For patients with a metachronous cancer they were 69, 55 and 37% (median 57 months), respectively, while neither patient with a metastatic tumor survived 1 year (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Limited lung resection on a single lung is a safe procedure associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. In patients with a metachronous lung cancer, long-term survival with a good quality of life can be obtained with limited resection on the residual lung.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: resection before implantation.

OBJECTIVE: After transluminal endovascular implantation of a new valved stent, the aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a high-pressure water stream to endovascularly resect human calcified aortic valves. METHODS: First, human calcified aortic valves were excised and then resected in vitro to determine optimal water jet parameters. Second, healthy porcine aortic valves were ablated in vitro to evaluate possible destruction to the surrounding anatomy. Third, resection was performed endoluminally by introducing microsystemic tools into the descending aorta, passing them through the arch and ascending aorta to the aortic valve in an in vitro porcine model. Macro- and micropathology of specimens were analyzed. RESULTS: First, resection of human calcified valves took a mean of 6.0+/-2.4min per three leaflets at 150bar (n=17). The maximum size of the cut leaflets was 7.1+/-1.7mm. Second, resection of healthy porcine aortic valves at 60bar took 2.3+/-0.3min per three leaflets (n=10). Only the aortic annulus was moderately affected in six cases. Third, endoluminal resection via the descending aorta took 12.2+/-0.8min per three leaflets at 60bar (n=10). The aortic wall was affected in four cases, the aortic annulus and the coronary ostia only once. Microscopic analysis also revealed superficial lesions with a maximum lesion depth of 1200microm in one case, and an average of 580+/-145microm in subsequent lesions. The mitral valve and the left ventricular outflow tract were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous resection of heart valves is emerging as a promising auxiliary method for the resection of calcified aortic heart valves because they can be cut endoscopically. Nonetheless, before this resection tool can be clinically applied by surgeons to perform a true percutaneous valve replacement, an additional aortic valve resection chamber (already at the prototype stage) designed for capturing all debris, has to be established.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography.

The radiographic assessment of extent of tumor burden and local vascular invasion appears to be enhanced with three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative 3D-CT in determining the resectability of patients with periampullary tumors. Intraoperative findings from exploratory laparotomy were gathered prospectively from 140 patients who were thought to have periampullary tumors and were deemed resectable after undergoing preoperative 3D-CT imaging. CT findings were compared to intraoperative findings, and the accuracy of 3D-CT in predicting tumor resectability and, ultimately, the likelihood of obtaining a margin-negative resection were assessed. Of the 140 patients who were thought to have resectable periampullary tumors after preoperative 3D-CT, 115 (82%) were subsequently determined to have periampullary cancer. The remaining 25 patients had benign disease. Among the patients with periampullary cancer, the extent of local tumor burden involving the pancreas and peripancreatic tissues was accurately depicted by 3D-CT in 93% of the patients. 3D-CT was 95% accurate in determining cancer invasion of the superior mesenteric vessels. Preoperative 3D-CT accurately predicted periampullary cancer resectability and a margin-negative resection in 98% and 86% of patients, respectively. For patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=85), preoperative 3D-CT resulted in a resectability rate and a margin-negative resection rate of 79% and 73%, respectively. The ability of 3D-CT to predict a margin-negative resection for periampullary cancer, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, relies on its enhanced assessment of the extent of local tumor burden and involvement of the mesenteric vascular anatomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗