Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Active placebos versus antidepressants for depression.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a consensus that antidepressants are effective in depression, placebo effects are also thought to be substantial. Side effects of antidepressants may reveal the identity of medication to participants or investigators and thus may bias the results of conventional trials using inert placebos. Using an 'active' placebo which mimics some of the side effects of antidepressants may help to counteract this potential bias. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of antidepressants when compared with 'active' placebos. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis review groups's search strategy was used to search MEDLINE (1966-2000), PsychLIT (1980-2000) and EMBASE (1974-2000) and this was last done in July 2000. Reference lists from relevant articles and textbooks were searched and 12 specialist journals were handsearched up to 1996. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi randomised controlled trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos in people with depression. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Since many different outcome measures were used a standard measure of effect was calculated for each trial. A subgroup analysis of inpatient and outpatient trials was conducted. Two reviewers independently assessed whether each trial met inclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Nine studies involving 751 participants were included. Two of them produced effect sizes which showed a consistent and statistically significant difference in favour of the active drug. Combining all studies produced a pooled estimate of effect of 0.39 standard deviations (confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.54) in favour of the antidepressant measured by improvement in mood. There was high heterogeneity due to one strongly positive trial. Sensitivity analysis omitting this trial reduced the pooled effect to 0.17 (0.00 to 0.34). The pooled effect for inpatient and outpatient trials was highly sensitive to decisions about which combination of data was included but inpatient trials produced the lowest effects. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The more conservative estimates from the present analysis found that differences between antidepressants and active placebos were small. This suggests that unblinding effects may inflate the efficacy of antidepressants in trials using inert placebos. Further research into unblinding is warranted.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2003

Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (r-metHuIL-1ra), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A large, international, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of anakinra (a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) in a large population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), typical of those seen in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 1,414 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 100 mg of anakinra or placebo, administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Background medications included disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, alone or in combination. The primary end point was safety, which was evaluated by adverse events (including infections), discontinuation from study due to adverse events, and death. RESULTS: Safety was evaluated in 1,399 patients (1,116 in the anakinra group and 283 in the placebo group; 15 patients were randomized but did not receive any study drug) during the initial 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of this long-term safety study. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and concomitant medications were similar between the 2 groups. The study group included patients with numerous comorbid conditions and a wide range of RA disease activity. Serious adverse events occurred at a similar rate in the anakinra group and the placebo group (7.7% and 7.8%, respectively). Serious infectious episodes were observed more frequently in the anakinra group (2.1% versus 0.4% in the placebo group). The rate of withdrawal due to adverse events was 13.4% in the anakinra group and 9.2% in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Results from this large, placebo-controlled safety study demonstrate that anakinra is safe and well tolerated in a diverse population of patients with RA, including those with comorbid conditions and those using multiple combinations of concomitant therapies. Although the frequency of serious infection was slightly higher in the anakinra group, no infection was attributed to opportunistic microorganisms or resulted in death.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2003

Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) is centrally involved in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and other spondylarthritides. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of anti-TNFalpha therapy with etanercept, a 75-kd receptor fusion protein, in active AS. METHODS: This multicenter trial had 2 phases: an initial placebo-controlled period of 6 weeks' duration and an observational phase lasting 24 weeks. Thirty patients with active AS were included. They were randomized into 2 groups, which received either etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) (n = 14) or placebo (n = 16) for 6 weeks. Then both groups were treated with etanercept. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment could be continued, but disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and steroids had to be withdrawn prior to the study. All patients received etanercept for a total of 12 weeks and were followed up for at least 24 weeks. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index, Bath AS Metrology Index, pain level on a numeric rating scale, quality of life by the Short Form 36, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level were assessed. The primary outcome parameter was a >or=50% improvement in the BASDAI. RESULTS: Treatment with etanercept resulted in at least a 50% regression of disease activity in 57% of these patients at week 6, versus 6% of the placebo-treated patients (P = 0.004). After the placebo-treated patients switched to etanercept, 56% improved. The mean +/- SD BASDAI improved from 6.5 +/- 1.2 at baseline to 3.5 +/- 1.9 at week 6 in the etanercept group, with no improvement in the placebo group (P = 0.003 between groups). Similarly, pain, function, mobility, and quality of life improved with etanercept but not with placebo at week 6 (P < 0.05). Mean CRP levels decreased significantly with etanercept but not with placebo (P = 0.001). There was ongoing improvement in all parameters in both groups until week 12 and week 18, respectively (i.e., throughout the period of etanercept treatment). Disease relapses occurred a mean +/- SD of 6.2 +/- 3.0 weeks after cessation of etanercept. No severe adverse events, including major infections, were observed during the trial. CONCLUSION: This study shows that on a short-term basis (3 months), treatment with etanercept is clearly efficacious in patients with active AS who are receiving NSAID therapy but not DMARDs or steroids. After cessation of therapy, almost all patients experienced a relapse within a few weeks. Thus, it seems probable that etanercept must be administered continuously in most AS patients to achieve permanent inhibition of the inflammatory process.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

On confidence bounds for the ratio of net differences in the "gold standard" design with reference, experimental, and placebo treatment.

The three-arm clinical study including a placebo has been recommended to be the preferred study design for the comparison of an experimental treatment relative to a reference treatment. In a confirmatory three-arm study multiplicity issues arise that are not present in two-arm studies. In the past a successful demonstration of superiority of the reference over placebo has been regarded a prerequisite validation step for the demonstration of superiority of the experimental treatment over placebo. However, for an investigator this last comparison is the most critical one. In a clinical study the demonstration of superiority of the experimental treatment over placebo is a result of its own value and this should therefore not be made dependent on tests that are of higher priority in a hierarchical test procedure. This can be achieved through a symmetrical formulation of Fieller's method for constructing confidence intervals for ratio of the expected values from normally distributed variables. In the symmetrical formulation the different meanings of nominator and denominator disappear, and simultaneous statements for comparisons between the experimental treatment and placebo, reference treatment and placebo, and reference and experimental treatment can be made. This is accomplished by moving the discussion on confidence sets from the line of real numbers to the unit circle which allows representing confidence sectors always as connected sets, gives always simple geometrical interpretations, and is easy to be transformed back to the real numbers if the traditional calculations behave well. The proposed procedures provides additional insight in existing methods but does obviously not answer the clinical question whether or not the demonstration of superiority of the reference treatment over placebo is a necessary validation step for further comparisons.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1975

Comparison of the hypnotic activity of triazolam, flurazepam hydrochloride, and placebo.

Triazolam, 0.4 and 0.8 mg, flurazepam, 15 and 30 mg, and placebo were compared in a double-blind, randomized 5-night crossover study in 25 inpatient insomniacs. These patients all complained difficulty falling asleep; all said they usually slept less than 5 hr a nigh and woke up too early in the morning. Results of the patients' global evaluation of the medications shows that all of the treatments were rated significantly higher than placebo, with the exception of triazolam, 0.4 mg, which was not significantly different from flurazepam, 15 or 30 mg, or from placebo. In subjective evaluation of sleep onset, only triazolam, 0.4 and 0.8 mg, was rated faster than placebo. All 4 active medications increased duration of sleep. Triazolam, 0.8 mg, and flurazepam, 30 mg, were rated as providing deeper sleep than placebo while all treatments except flurazepam, 15 mg, decreased the number of awakenings below that on placebo. A significant dose-response curve was obtained with triazolam and flurazepam for some of the parameters. Very few adverse effects were reported. One patient reported feeling groggy and drowsy on 0.4 mg triazolam while 2 reported nightmares on placebo.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Placebo response in binge eating disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Placebo response in studies of binge eating disorder (BED) has raised concern about its diagnostic stability. The aims of this study were (1) to compare placebo responders (PRs) with nonresponders (NRs); (2) to investigate the course of BED following placebo response; and (3) to examine attributions regarding placebo response. METHOD: The baseline placebo run-in phase (BL) was part of a RCT investigating sibutramine hydrochloride for BED; it included 451 participants, ages 19-63, diagnosed with BED. Follow-up (FU) included 33 PRs. RESULTS: : In this study, 32.6% of participants responded to placebo (PRs = 147; NRs = 304). PRs exhibited significantly less symptom severity. At FU (n = 33), many PRs reported continued symptoms. CONCLUSION: PRs exhibited significantly less severe pathology than NRs. Placebo response in BED may transitory or incomplete. The results of this study suggest variable stability in the BED diagnosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Sodium valproate in the treatment of aggressive behavior in patients with dementia--a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and tolerability of sodium valproate 2 x 240 mg compared to placebo were investigated in aggressive behavior in dementia. DESIGN: A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind cross-over design. The trial included a baseline period (one week); a placebo period (three weeks); a wash-out period with placebo (one week); and a treatment period with sodium valproate (three weeks). SETTING: A psychogeriatric short-stay ward at a psychiatric teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Demented patients who met Patel's criteria for aggressive behavior and had a score of > or =3 on at least one of the items of the Social Dysfunction and Aggression scale-9 (SDAS-9). INTERVENTION: A fixed dose of sodium valproate 2 x 6 ml of a 40 mg/ml suspension (daily defined dose of 480 mg) was compared to placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome variables were changes of the score of SDAS-9 and Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) performed at the last week of each treatment period. RESULTS: Data of 42 patients (F=25 and M=17; age 80.4+/-6.8 years) were analyzed. Treatment with sodium valproate showed no differences compared to placebo on aggressive behavior. The mean plasma level of sodium valproate was 40.9+/-10.8 microg/ml. Regression analysis showed a trend for improvement between the plasma levels of sodium valproate and the SDAS-9 and the CGI scores. Adverse events were not related to the plasma levels of sodium valproate. Secondary outcome measurements showed significant improvement on restless, melancholic and anxious behavior; a trend for improvement was found on suspicious and dependent behavior. Possible limitations of this study are the low dose of sodium valproate, the relatively short treatment period (three weeks), and the absence of statistical corrections for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: This study showed no effect of sodium valproate 2 x 240 mg over placebo on aggressive behavior in dementia.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Alendronate improves bone mineral density in primary biliary cirrhosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Bone loss is a well-recognized complication of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Although it has been suggested that alendronate might improve bone mineral density (BMD) in PBC, no randomized placebo-controlled trial has been conducted. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of alendronate versus placebo on BMD and biochemical measurements of bone turnover in patients with PBC-associated bone loss. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with a PBC and BMD t score of less than -1.5 were randomized to receive 70 mg per week of alendronate or placebo over 1 year. BMD of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were measured at entry and at 1 year. Changes from baseline in BMD and biochemical measurements of bone turnover were assessed. Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients were randomized to each arm. After 1 year, a significantly larger improvement (P = .005) in spine BMD was observed in the alendronate group (0.09 +/- 0.03 g/cm2 SD from baseline) compared with the placebo group (-0.003 +/- 0.02 g/cm2 SD from baseline). A larger improvement (P = .046) was also observed in the femoral BMD of alendronate patients versus placebo. BMD changes were independent of concomitant estrogen therapy. The rate of adverse effects was similar in both groups. In conclusion, in patients with PBC-related bone loss, alendronate significantly improves BMD compared with placebo. Although in this study oral alendronate appears to be well tolerated in patients with PBC, larger studies are needed to formally evaluate safety.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo-controlled trial.

The purpose of this article is to clarify the decision points that are important to consider when evaluating the ethics of a placebo-controlled trial. The ethical requirements for research involving human subjects are reviewed, and the rationale for and potential problems with concomitant placebo control are explained. A series of case discussions are used to illustrate each decision point. The critical decision points in the evaluation of the ethics of a placebo-controlled trial are as follows: (i) Is placebo being used in place of standard therapy? (ii) Is standard therapy likely to be effective? (iii) Is the toxicity of standard therapy such that patients routinely refuse this treatment? (iv) Could the use of placebo result in severe suffering or irreversible harm? (v) Is the variability in the placebo response such that it is reasonable to consider other options for the control group? (vi) Would a reasonable person with an average degree of altruism and risk aversiveness agree to participate in this study? The algorithm presented in this article gives researchers and research monitors (such as Institutional Review Board members) the tools they need to evaluate the ethics of a study that uses concomitant placebo control.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Placebo effect and dopamine release.

The placebo effect can be encountered in a great variety of medical conditions, but is particularly prominent in pain, depression and Parkinson's disease. It has been shown that placebo responses play a part in the effect of any type of treatment for Parkinson's disease, including drug therapy, deep brain stimulation and dopamine tissue transplantation. Recent studies have demonstrated that the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease is related to the release of substantial amounts of endogenous dopamine in both the dorsal and ventral striatum. As the ventral striatum is involved in reward processing, these observations suggest that the placebo effect may be linked to reward mechanisms. In keeping with this placebo-reward model, most recent experiments have shown activation of the reward circuitry in association with placebo responses in other disorders. In addition, as dopamine is the major neurotransmitter in the reward circuitry, the model predicts that the release of dopamine in the ventral striatum could be involved in mediating placebo responses not only in Parkinson's but also in other medical conditions.

Antiparkinson Agents↗
PubMed1980

Cimetidine vs placebo in duodenal ulcer therapy. Six-week controlled double-blind investigation without any antacid therapy.

We studied the healing efficacy of cimetidine or placebo in 23 endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer outpatients in a randomized, controlled, prospective, double-blind trial. There were 11 patients in the cimetidine (1200 mg daily) treatment group and 12 patients in the placebo-treated group. No antacid was allowed, but a placebo antacid with no neutralizing capacity was given as needed for pain. The incidence of complete endoscopic healing at 2, 4, and 6 weeks was 54%, 63%, and 72% in the cimetidine-treated patients and 8%, 50%, and 67% in the placebo-treated patients. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in complete duodenal ulcer healing between both treatment groups after 2 weeks of therapy, but there was no significant difference at the 4- and 6-week observation periods. The incidence of complete pain relief at 2 and 4 weeks was 64% and 82% in the cimetidine-treated patients and 67% and 75% in the placebo-treated patients. At 6 weeks of treatment there was no increase in the number of patients with complete pain relief in either group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of ulcer pain relief at any of the three observation periods. Duodenal ulcer healing rates and duodenal ulcer pain relief were compared at 2, 4, and 6 weeks. There was no statistical association between ulcer healing and complete pain relief in the placebo treatment group at the 2-week evaluation period, but there was statistical association (P < 0.05) in the cimetidine treatment group at 2 weeks and both treatment groups at the 4- and 6-week evaluation periods. The results of this study demonstrate that in duodenal ulcer out-patients treated for 6 weeks: (1) cimetidine increases the incidence of duodenal ulcer healing during the first 2 weeks of treatment; (2) more than 50% of duodenal ulcers will spontaneously heal during a 4 to 6-week observation period which is not statistically modified by cimetidine treatment; (3) the complete relief of duodenal ulcer pain is not influenced by treatment with cimetidine when compared to placebo.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

On the efficacy of alcohol placebos in inducing feelings of intoxication.

Placebo efficacy was monitored during three separate experiments concerned with the effects of ethanol (0.8 ml/kg body weight) on some aspect of performance: at regular intervals during experimental sessions, blood alcohol concentration was estimated using a breathalyser and subjects completed an intoxication rating. The simple placebo beverages and manipulations employed were similar to those typically described in the literature, and each experiment involved a repeated measures design. Across the three experiments, maximum mean (median) ratings during placebo sessions, expressed as a percentage of those during alcohol sessions of equivalent period, ranged between 10% (0%) and 69% (72%), and the number of subjects in each experiment for whom a placebo effect was considered to have been negligible ranged between 8% and 73%. For each treatment, intoxication ratings were higher during treatment periods which occurred first than during those which occurred second. However, this transfer effect was twice as large for placebo treatments as for alcohol treatments and, whereas in respect of the latter the effect was statistically non-significant, it was highly significant in respect of the former. The occurrence of such asymmetrical transfer of placebo efficacy suggests that repeated measures designs should be used with caution in drug studies in which a convincing placebo treatment is necessary and difficult to devise.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sildenafil (Viagra) for erectile dysfunction after rectal excision for cancer and inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE: Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of sildenafil for "mixed etiology" erectile dysfunction, but this may not be the case if there is underlying pelvic parasympathetic nerve damage. We aimed to determine the efficacy of sildenafil after rectal excision for rectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Patients with erectile dysfunction after rectal excision were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to sildenafil or placebo groups. After unblinding, placebo patients crossed over to open sildenafil. Primary end points were improvement in erectile function on a global efficacy question and erectile function questionnaire scores. Secondary end points were frequency and severity of side effects. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were randomly assigned, and two dropped out before randomization. Fourteen received sildenafil, and 18 received placebo. Eleven (79 percent) of 14 responded to sildenafil, on global efficacy assessment, compared with 3 (17 percent) of 18 taking placebo (mean difference, 61.9 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 34.4 to 89.4 percent; P = 0.0009). Sildenafil improved both erectile function domain scores (mean difference, 13.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 7.9 to 18.7; P = 0.0001) and total International Index of Erectile Function scores (mean difference, 30.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 18.7 to 42.6; P < 0.0001) from pretreatment baseline scores. Placebo did not produce improvement in either erectile function (mean difference, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.8 to 4.2; P = 0.16) or total International Index of Erectile Function scores (mean difference, 5; 95 percent confidence interval, -1.1 to 11.1; P = 0.1). Ten (100 percent) of 10 crossover patients not responding to placebo did respond to sildenafil (difference, 100 percent; P < 0.0001). Sildenafil improved both erectile function domain scores (mean difference, 16.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 9.7 to 24; P = 0.002) and total International Index of Erectile Function scores (mean difference, 29.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 15.8 to 43.2; P = 0.003) from precrossover baseline scores. Seven (50 percent) of 14 patients on sildenafil compared with 4 (22 percent) of 18 on placebo experienced side effects (difference, 28 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -4.4 to 60.4 percent; P = 0.14), 91 percent of which were mild and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil completely reverses or satisfactorily improves postproctectomy erectile dysfunction in 79 percent of patients. Side effects are usually mild and well tolerated. The damage incurred by the pelvic nerves after proctectomy, less profound than after prostatectomy, is likely to result in a partial parasympathetic nerve lesion.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The use of placebo-controlled and non-inferiority trials for the evaluation of new drugs in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Registration of new agents for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has been based over the past few years on placebo-controlled phase III trials with the incidence of patients with new vertebral/nonvertebral fractures as the most usual primary endpoint. The use of a placebo in diseases where an active treatment is available has been a matter of debate following the update of the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association which questioned this trial design. Current regulatory recommendations within the European Union suggest that placebo-controlled trials are still the best option when assessing the efficacy and safety of new drugs intended for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This suggestion seems to be in apparent contradiction with the current content of the Declaration of Helsinki. This paper addresses the ethics and feasibility of placebo-controlled trials in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, in the light of available therapeutic options, and discusses possible alternative approaches in those patients where placebo treatment could be deemed to be unethical. It is concluded that placebo-controlled trials remain the most efficient design to establish the efficacy and safety of a new agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Such trials are feasible and ethically acceptable in patients with osteoporosis but without prevalent vertebral fractures. Conversely, in patients with prevalent vertebral fractures, placebo-controlled trials are ethically questionable and non-inferiority trials are more appropriate. A relative margin of non-inferiority of 20-30% is suggested, to be discussed on a case by case basis.

Aged↗
PubMed1981

Naproxen sodium, aspirin, and placebo in primary dysmenorrhea. Reduction of pain and blood levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha metabolite.

In a double-blind, crossover study of 32 women with primary dysmenorrhea, the analgesic efficacy of naproxen sodium was compared to that of aspirin and placebo. The treatment started 1 to 5 days before the onset of menses and continued for 3 to 5 days. At the same time, a radioimmunoassay established concentrations of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2-alpha, a prostaglandin F2-alpha metabolite (PGF-M) in blood samples obtained from before the treatment and on the first day of menses. In affording pain relief, naproxen sodium was superior to aspirin (p = 0.02) and placebo (p = 0.002); however, aspirin was not superior to placebo (p = 0.05). During naproxen sodium treatment, the patients' daily activities were less impaired than during both the aspirin and the placebo treatment courses. During naproxen sodium treatment, the mean blood PGF-M levels decreased by 73.5%, from a mean of 50.5 to 13.4 pg/ml; during aspirin treatment they decreased by 31.2%, from a mean of 44.2 to 30.4 pg/ml; during placebo treatment, an increase of 13.6% was observed, from a mean of 46.3 to 52.6 pg/ml. The PGF-M decrease during the naproxen sodium treatment was significantly more prominent than that during both aspirin and placebo treatments (p = 0.0001). Changes caused by aspirin treatment were significantly different from those occurring during the placebo treatment (p = 0.001). The study confirms that at the doses utilized in this study the analgesic properties of naproxen sodium are superior to those of the more conventional prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor, aspirin, and that pain relief is related to the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1986

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of terfenadine suspension in the treatment of fall-allergic rhinitis in children.

Children, aged 6 to 12 years, with fall-pollenosis symptoms, were evaluated for their response to a new antihistamine, terfenadine, in a multicenter (six centers) 1-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All had positive skin tests to grass/weed pollens and/or mold spores prevalent in the fall at each center. Patients were administered placebo or terfenadine as suspension on a randomized basis, with children weighing less than 30 kg receiving terfenadine suspension, 30 mg twice daily, and those weighing greater than 30 kg receiving 60 mg, twice daily. Of the 119 children enrolled, 79 received terfenadine and 40 received placebo. All but two (lost to follow-up) were included for the evaluation of drug safety, whereas 16 were excluded from the efficacy evaluation (11 receiving terfenadine and five receiving placebo) because of protocol noncompliance. Overall, varying degrees of control of symptoms were observed in 85% of the patients in the group taking terfenadine as compared to 60% in the group taking placebo. The symptoms of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and sneezing demonstrated the best response. There was no difference between the two groups in adverse events or side effects. Before and after treatment complete blood count, biochemical profile, and urinalysis revealed that there was no change from beginning to end and no difference between the groups. We conclude that terfenadine suspension is a safe, nonsedating antihistamine with an incidence of side effects no different from that of placebo. It is more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms of fall pollenosis in children.

Benzhydryl Compounds↗
PubMed1994

Comparison of oral pulse methotrexate with placebo in the treatment of severe glucocorticosteroid-dependent asthma.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of weekly oral administration of methotrexate and placebo in treatment of 24 subjects with chronic glucocorticosteroid-dependent asthma. METHODS: The 33-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial compared once weekly 15 mg doses of methotrexate with placebo. At the time of entry, the subjects' mean dosage of prednisone was 23.8 mg/day (range, 12.5 to 85 mg) and glucocorticosteroid therapy had been used continuously for a mean duration of 78 months (range, 5 to 360 months). RESULTS: Of the 21 subjects who completed the study, 13 tolerated lower daily prednisone doses during methotrexate treatment compared with placebo. When treated with methotrexate, subjects required 14.2% less prednisone than when treated with placebo (p = 0.0447), their subjective symptom scores improved 21.4% (p < 0.05), and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second values tended to improve. Mean serum theophylline levels did not change significantly between the methotrexate and placebo arms of the study. Adverse effects were minimal, with nausea and headache occurring twice as often during methotrexate therapy compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Short-term, low-dose, pulse therapy with orally administered methotrexate results in a decrease in the daily glucocorticosteroid requirement in a majority of subjects with severe asthma and is accompanied by improvement in subjective symptom scores without unacceptable side effects or deterioration of pulmonary function.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1981

A survey of placebo use in a general hospital.

Two hundred thirty registered nurses and seventy physicians participated in a retrospective study scrutinizing placebo effects, prescribing patterns, and staff attitudes in a university-based general hospital setting. Despite copious experimental literature devoted to placebo effects over the past thirty years, the medical and surgical use of placebos seems to disregard experimental data. Although 80% of the staff had used placebos in the hospital, their knowledge of placebo effects was in many respects deficient. Within the hospital, 89% of placebo use was directed toward the amelioration of "pain"; the authors believe that emphasis should be placed on the education of staff to perceive emotional, social, and physiological concomitants of pain rather than resorting to a purely physicalistic approach. A need to acknowledge staff conflicts over the ethical use of placebos should be a significant part of this educational approach.

Drug Utilization↗