Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Inhalation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Partial liquid ventilation with and without inhaled nitric oxide in a newborn piglet model of meconium aspiration.

The object of this study was to determine the effects of partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with and without inhaled nitric oxide (NO) over a 4-h period on lung mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamics in an animal model of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). Twenty-four fentanyl-anesthetized piglets were instrumented and administered a slurry of human meconium to create a model with hypoxia, hypercarbia, acidosis, and pulmonary hypertension. They were then randomly assigned to conventional ventilation, conventional ventilation plus inhaled NO at 40 ppm, PLV using perfluorodecalin, or PLV plus inhaled NO. The perfluorocarbon was added until a meniscus was visible in the endotracheal tube during expiration. Hemodynamics, lung mechanics, and gas exchange were monitored for 4 h, and then the animals were killed. The conventionally ventilated animals continued to deteriorate, and three of the six died prior to 4 h. All the animals in the remaining groups survived. Oxygenation improved significantly immediately with the start of inhaled NO (from 43.8 SD 10.3 to 62.6 SD 11.7 mm Hg after 30 min) and stayed elevated compared with the control group for the remainder of the study (62.4 SD 21.8 mm Hg at 4 h compared with 44.9 SD 1.6 mm Hg for the control group, p < 0.05). Oxygenation improved more slowly in the PLV alone group, being slightly less than control at 30 min (p = NS) but increasing to 104 SD 34.9 after 4 h (p < 0.01 compared with the control group), at which time it was also greater than inhaled NO alone (p < 0.05). The combined group had an acute increase in oxygenation indistinguishable from the NO alone group and maintained this until the end of the study. Lung compliance was unaffected in the inhaled NO group. In both the liquid ventilation groups the lung compliance improved with the instillation of perfluorodecalin (from 0.46 SD 0.18 to 0.62 SD 0.09 ml/cm H(2)O/kg in the PLV alone group at 1 h, p < 0.05 compared with the control group) and remained stable for the remainder of the study. Cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance were not significantly affected by any of the treatments. It was concluded that in this animal model of MAS, inhaled NO led to an acute improvement in gas exchange and prolonged survival compared with conventional therapy. PLV improved lung mechanics, which was maintained over the course of the study. The combination of PLV and inhaled NO produced both effects, acutely improving both gas exchange and lung mechanics. Combined therapy with PLV and inhaled NO may have benefits in the MAS.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Inhaled NO as a viable antiadhesive therapy for ischemia/reperfusion injury of distal microvascular beds.

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is being used more and more in intensive care units as a modality to improve the outcome of patients with pulmonary complications. Our objective was to demonstrate that inhaled NO could impact upon a distally inflamed microvasculature-improving perfusion, leukocyte adhesive interactions, and endothelial dysfunction. Using intravital microscopy to visualize ischemia/reperfusion of postcapillary venules, we were able to demonstrate that the reduction in perfusion, the dramatic increase in leukocyte rolling, adhesion, and emigration, and the endothelial dysfunction could all be significantly abrogated with 80 ppm, but not 20 ppm inhaled NO. Perfusing whole blood directly over an inert P-selectin and CD18 ligand substratum incorporated in a flow chamber recruited the same number of rolling and adhering leukocytes from NO-ventilated and non-NO-ventilated animals, suggesting that inhaled NO was not directly affecting leukocytes. To demonstrate that inhaled NO was actually reaching the peripheral microvasculature in vivo, we applied a NO synthase inhibitor locally to the feline mesentery and demonstrated that the vasoconstriction, as well as leukocyte recruitment, were essentially abolished by inhaled NO, suggesting that a NO-depleted peripheral microvasculature could be replenished with inhaled NO in vivo. Finally, inhaled NO at the same concentration that was effective in ischemia/reperfusion did not affect vascular alterations, leukocyte recruitment, and endothelial dysfunction associated with endotoxemia in the feline mesentery. In conclusion, our data for the first time demonstrate a role for inhaled NO as a therapeutic delivery system to the peripheral microvasculature, showing tremendous efficacy as an antiadhesive, antivasoconstrictive, and antipermeabilizing molecule in NO-depleted tissues, but not normal microvessels or vessels that have an abundance of NO (LPS-treated). The notion that blood borne molecules have NO carrying capacity is conceptually consistent with our observations.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

alpha1-Antitrypsin inhalation reduces airway inflammation in cystic fibrosis patients.

The airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are characterised by neutrophils that release high amounts of elastase overwhelming the local antiprotease shield. Inhalation of alpha(1)-antitrypsin (AAT) may restore the protease-antiprotease balance and attenuate airway inflammation in CF airways. The aims of the present study were: 1) to assess the best deposition region for inhaled AAT by two different inhalation strategies; and 2) to examine the effect of 4 weeks of AAT inhalation on lung function, protease-antiprotease balance and airway inflammation in CF patients. In a prospective, randomised study, 52 CF patients received a daily deposition by inhalation of 25 mg AAT for 4 weeks targeting their peripheral or bronchial compartment. The levels of elastase activity, AAT, pro-inflammatory cytokines, neutrophils, immunoglobulin G fragments and the numbers of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were assessed in induced sputum before and after the inhalation period. Inhalation of AAT increased AAT levels and decreased the levels of elastase activity, neutrophils, pro-inflammatory cytokines and the numbers of P. aeruginosa. However, it had no effect on lung function. No difference was found between the peripheral and bronchial inhalation mode. In conclusion, although no effect on lung function was observed, the clear reduction of airway inflammation after alpha(1)-antitrypsin treatment may precede pulmonary structural changes. The alpha(1)-antitrypsin deposition region may play a minor role for alpha(1)-antitrypsin inhalation in cystic fibrosis patients.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: To review the comparative studies evaluating both efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of asthma. Specifically, comparative clinical trials are evaluated that allow clinicians to determine relative potencies of the various inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A critical review was performed of the published clinical trials, either as articles or abstracts, comparing the clinical efficacy or systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids. No a priori criteria were applied, as this was not a meta-analysis. FINDINGS: In vitro measures of antiinflammatory activity of corticosteroids consistently demonstrate potency differences among the various corticosteroids. Traditionally, these in vitro measures have been used to develop new corticosteroids with greater topical activity. While no accepted direct measure of antiasthmatic antiinflammatory activity exists, clinical trials using surrogate measures (e.g., forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, symptom control) indicate that in vitro measures provide a relatively accurate assessment of antiasthmatic potency. The relative antiinflammatory potency of the inhaled corticosteroids is in the following rank order. flunisolide = triamcinolone acetonide < beclomethasone dipropionate = budesonide < fluticasone. Studies of systemic activity appear to confirm this relative order of potency. Currently, no evidence exists for greater efficacy for any of the inhaled corticosteroids when administered in their relative equipotent dosages. The preponderance of current data suggests that when administered in equipotent antiinflammatory doses as a metered-dose inhaler plus spacer or as their respective dry-powder inhaler, the existing inhaled corticosteroids have similar risks of producing systemic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery systems can significantly affect both topical and systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids. More direct comparative studies between agents are required to firmly establish comparative topical to systemic activity ratios. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the agents are not equipotent on a microgram basis.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Inhaled amphotericin B for prophylaxis against invasive Aspergillus infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available literature describing the use of inhaled amphotericin B for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus spp. infections. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was conducted (1966-July 2006) using the key terms amphotericin B, inhaled amphotericin B, Aspergillus spp., invasive aspergillosis, solid-organ transplant, neutropenia, and inhalation. Review of the reference lists of the identified articles was also performed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Study selection included published trials, case reports, and case series of humans with hematologic disease and solid-organ transplant who used inhaled amphotericin B in the prevention of invasive Aspergillus infections. DATA SYNTHESIS: Inhaled amphotericin B has been evaluated for the prevention of invasive aspergillosis (IA) infections in neutropenic patients and certain solid-organ transplant recipients. Use of inhaled amphotericin B seems to reduce the incidence of IA in these patients; however, some of the clinical evidence was limited by factors such as small sample sizes, lack of statistical analyses, and lack of power to detect a difference between prophylaxis and control groups. Although the clinical evidence supporting the use of inhaled amphotericin B has some limitations, its use still may be beneficial for the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus infections, especially in solid-organ transplant recipients where the evidence is strongest. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive Aspergillus infections are becoming more prevalent in high-risk populations (eg, patients with malignancies, following bone marrow transplantation, or following solid-organ transplantation). The mortality rates associated with IA are great in these populations, making prophylaxis an important consideration. Inhaled amphotericin B has recently come into vogue as an option for prophylaxis against IA. Some of the data available supports the use of inhaled amphotericin B for the prevention of IA while providing evidence of fewer drug interactions and toxicities associated with other antifungal agents.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Use of inhaled corticosteroids and risk of fractures.

Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is known to increase the risk of fractures but little is known of the fracture risks associated with inhaled corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large UK primary care database (the General Practice Research Database [GPRD]). Inhaled corticosteroid users aged 18 years or older were compared with matched control patients and to a group of noncorticosteroid bronchodilator users. Patients with concomitant use of systemic corticosteroids were excluded. The study comprised 170,818 inhaled corticosteroid users, 108,786 bronchodilator users, and 170,818 control patients. The average age was 45.1 years in the inhaled corticosteroid, 49.3 years in the bronchodilator, and 45.2 years in the control groups. In the inhaled corticosteroid cohort, 54.5% were female. The relative rates (RRs) of nonvertebral, hip, and vertebral fractures during inhaled corticosteroid treatment compared with control were 1.15 (95% CI, 1.10-1.20), 1.22 (95% CI, 1.04-1.43), and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.22-1.85), respectively. No differences were found between the inhaled corticosteroid and bronchodilator groups (nonvertebral fracture RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06). The rates of nonvertebral fractures among users of budesonide (RR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.07) and fluticasone propionate (RR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71-1.49) were similar to the rate determined for users of beclomethasone dipropionate. We conclude that users of inhaled corticosteroids have an increased risk of fracture, particularly at the hip and spine. However, this excess risk may be related more to the underlying respiratory disease than to inhaled corticosteroid.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

Inhaled nitric oxide does not change transpulmonary angiotensin II formation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of short-term inhalation of nitric oxide (NO) on transpulmonary angiotensin II formation in patients with severe ARDS. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. SETTING: Anesthesiology ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten ARDS patients who responded to inhalation of 100 ppm NO by decreasing their pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by at least 20 dyne x s x cm(-5) were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: In addition to standard treatment, the patients inhaled 0, 1, and 100 ppm NO in 20-min intervals. Fraction of inspired oxygen was 1.0. Hemodynamics were measured and recorded online. Mixed venous (pulmonary arterial catheter) and arterial (arterial catheter) blood samples were taken simultaneously for hormonal analyses at the end of each inhalation period. RESULTS: Pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 33+/-2 mm Hg (0 ppm NO, mean+/-SEM) to 29+/-2 mm Hg (1 ppm NO, p<0.05), and to 27+/-2 mm Hg (100 ppm NO, p<0.05, vs 0 ppm). PVR decreased from 298+/-56 (0 ppm NO) to 243+/-45 dyne x s x cm(-5) (1 ppm NO, not significant [NS]), and to 197+/-34 dyne x s x cm(-5) (100 ppm NO, p<0.05, vs 0 ppm). Arterial oxygen pressure increased from 174+/-23 mm Hg (0 ppm NO) to 205+/-26 mm Hg (1 ppm NO, NS), and to 245+/-25 mm Hg (100 ppm NO, p <0.05, vs 0 ppm). Mean plasma angiotensin II concentrations were 85+/-20 (arterial) and 57+/-13 pg/mL (mixed venous) during 0 ppm NO and did not change during inhalation of 1 and 100 ppm NO. Mean transpulmonary plasma angiotensin II concentration gradient (=difference between arterial and mixed venous blood values) was 28+/-8 pg/mL (range, 0 to 69) during 0 ppm NO and did not change during inhalation of 1 and 100 ppm NO. Mean transpulmonary angiotensin II formation (transpulmonary angiotensin II gradient multiplied with the cardiac index) was 117+/-39 ng/min/m2 (range, 0 to 414) during 0 ppm NO and did not change during inhalation of 1 and 100 ppm NO. Mean arterial plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate concentration was 11+/-2 pmol/mL (0 ppm NO), did not change during 1 ppm NO, and increased to 58+/-8 pmol/mL (100 ppm NO, p<0.05). Arterial plasma concentrations of aldosterone (142+/-47 pg/mL), atrial natriuretic peptide (114+/-34 pg/mL), angiotensin-converting enzyme (30+/-5 U/L), and plasma renin activity (94+/-26 ng/mL/h of angiotensin I) did not change. CONCLUSION: The decrease of PVR by short-term NO inhalation in ARDS patients was not accompanied by changes in transpulmonary angiotensin II formation. Our results do not support any relationship between transpulmonary angiotensin II formation and the decrease in PVR induced by inhaled NO.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Effects of budesonide inhalation suspension compared with cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution on health status and caregiver quality of life in childhood asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 nebulizable controller asthma medications on caregiver and pediatric quality of life. METHODS: In this 52-week, randomized trial, children aged 2 to 6 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma received budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg (total daily dose) once or twice daily (n = 168) or cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution 20 mg 4 times daily (n = 167) for 8 weeks, with dosage adjustment thereafter at the investigators' discretion. The Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ), Compliance/Caregiver Satisfaction Questionnaire (CCSQ), Modified Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50), and Functional Status-II(R) (FS-II[R]) Questionnaire were administered at baseline and weeks 8, 28, and 52. Global assessments of ease of asthma management and child health status were obtained from caregivers and physicians at the end of the study. RESULTS: Improvements from baseline in domain-specific (activities and emotional function) and total PACQLQ scores were greater at each time point (weeks 8, 28, and 52) for caregivers of patients treated with budesonide compared with caregivers of patients receiving cromolyn sodium. Only the budesonide group met the criterion for a clinically important improvement (>or=0.5 unit change) in all PACQLQ domains by week 8, which was maintained at weeks 28 and 52. Moreover, improvements surpassed the criterion for moderate clinical importance (1.0 unit change) in all PACQLQ domains for the budesonide group, but this level of improvement was only achieved in the activities domain (at week 28) for the cromolyn sodium group. Based on the CCSQ, budesonide resulted in greater caregiver satisfaction, treatment convenience, ease of use, and compliance compared with cromolyn sodium. Thus, 90.7% of caregivers in the budesonide group were "completely or very satisfied" compared with 53.4% in the cromolyn sodium group. Over half (54.6%) of caregivers in the budesonide group rated budesonide "highly or very convenient" compared with 23% for cromolyn sodium; 77% rated budesonide "extremely or very easy" to use compared with 47% for cromolyn. Adherence with daily medication regimens was reported for 76% of children in the budesonide group compared with 57% in the cromolyn sodium group. Child health status, as indicated by mean FS-II(R) scores, showed improvements from baseline in both groups at weeks 8, 28, and 52. There was a trend for these improvements to be superior in the budesonide group. Additionally, budesonide was superior to cromolyn sodium in caregiver and physician global assessments. At the end of the study, 76% of caregivers of children receiving budesonide reported asthma management to be "a great deal easier" compared with the start of the study, and 74% rated the overall health status of their child as "much better now than 1 year ago." In contrast, only 29% and 37% of caregivers whose children received cromolyn sodium provided these respective ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide inhalation suspension improved the quality of life for caregivers of children with asthma. Caregivers of children treated with budesonide had significantly fewer limitations in daily activities and emotional functioning compared with caregivers of children treated with cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution. The improvements in caregiver quality of life occurred earlier with budesonide compared with cromolyn sodium. Only caregivers in the budesonide group had a clinically important mean change from baseline in all PACQLQ domains by week 8. These benefits were maintained at week 52. Children treated with budesonide inhalation suspension and cromolyn sodium experienced improvements in health status, assessed using the FS-II(R). The greatest differences between treatments were seen in the disease-specific portion of the FS-II(R), which relates impairments in functional status to the child's illness. Caregiver and physician global assessment indicated significantly better overall child health after 1 year of treatment with budesonide, supporting an improvement in health status. Clinical trials in children 4 to 16 years of age with asthma have demonstrated greater effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids versus cromolyn sodium on several clinical measures of efficacy. Measures of asthma control in this study, reported in detail elsewhere [Leflein et al. Pediatrics 2002;109:866-872], also have shown greater improvements with budesonide therapy. Treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension resulted in a significantly lower mean rate of asthma exacerbations, significantly longer times to first asthma exacerbation, significantly longer times to first additional use of chronic asthma therapy, and significant improvements in asthma symptom scores and breakthrough medication use compared with cromolyn sodium therapy. Additionally, children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension experienced more symptom-free days and episode-free days compared with children receiving cromolyn sodium. Safety profiles were similar between the 2 treatment groups. Budesonide inhalation suspension was associated with significantly greater caregiver satisfaction, convenience, ease of use, and compliance compared with cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution. This greater caregiver satisfaction and quality of life may be related to the greater asthma control achieved in children treated with budesonide therapy compared with cromolyn sodium. In addition, the convenience of once- or twice-daily dosing with budesonide inhalation suspension, compared with 3- or 4-times-daily dosing of cromolyn sodium, may decrease caregiver burden and enhance the willingness of caregivers to adhere to treatment regimens prescribed for their young children with asthma. This effect on caregiver adherence could further improve treatment effectiveness. This is the first clinical trial comparing the effects of a nebulized corticosteroid with that of an alternative nebulized therapy on quality of life in young children with asthma and their families. Compared with nebulized cromolyn sodium, budesonide inhalation suspension not only provides better overall child health status and asthma management, but greater caregiver quality of life and greater caregiver satisfaction, convenience, ease of use, and compliance.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Paired acute inhalation test reveals that acetaldehyde toxicity is higher in aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 knockout mice than in wild-type mice.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is an important enzyme that oxidizes acetaldehyde. Approximately 45% of Chinese and Japanese individuals have the inactive ALDH2 genotypes (ALDH2*2/*2 and ALDH2*1/*2); acute inhalation toxicity of acetaldehyde has not been evaluated in these populations. We compared the toxicity between wild-type (Aldh2+/+) and Aldh2-inactive transgenic (Aldh2-/-) mice by using the paired acute inhalation test modified from the acute toxic class method (OECD TG433). Blood acetaldehyde level was measured 4 hr after the inhalation. A pair of Aldh2+/+ and Aldh2-/- mice was put into a chamber and was exposed to 5000 ppm of acetaldehyde. At the start of the inhalation, the mice exhibited hypoactivity and closing of the eyes. Subsequently, symptoms such as crouching, bradypnea, and piloerection were observed. Flushing was observed only in the Aldh2+/+ mice. Symptoms such as tears, straggling gait, prone position, pale skin, abnormal deep respiration, dyspnea, and one case of death were observed only in the Aldh2-/- mice. The symptoms did not change 1 hr after inhalation in the Aldh2+/+ mice. In contrast, in the Aldh2-/- mice, the symptoms became more severe until the end of the inhalation. The blood acetaldehyde level in the Aldh2-/- mice was approximately twice that in the Aldh2+/+ mice 4 hr after inhalation. The Aldh2-/- mice evidently showed more severe toxicity as compared with the Aldh2+/+ mice due to acute inhalation of acetaldehyde at a concentration of 5000 ppm. Acetaldehyde toxicity in Aldh2+/+ and Aldh2-/- mice was estimated and classified one class different. Based on this study, acetaldehyde inhalations were inferred to pose a higher risk to ALDH2-inactive human individuals.

Acetaldehyde↗
PubMed2001

Inhaled salmeterol: a review of its efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

UNLABELLED: Inhaled salmeterol is a long-acting, selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilator. The drug has been compared with placebo, ipratropium bromide and oral theophylline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in randomised, clinical trials. Inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily produced significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), equivalent to that obtained with inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily and greater than that obtained with placebo or oral theophylline in randomised trials. Use of as-needed salbutamol (albuterol) was significantly reduced during treatment with inhaled salmeterol or ipratropium bromide compared with placebo or oral theophylline. The time to first COPD exacerbation was significantly longer during 12 weeks of treatment with inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily than ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily. Compared with baseline and placebo, patients treated for 16 weeks with salmeterol 50 microg (but not 100 microg) twice daily reported significant improvement in total St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores. Similarly, more patients treated with inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily or ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily experienced an increase of > or = 10 points in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) scores, the minimum clinically significant increment. Compared with placebo, inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily alone, or concurrent with ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily improved lung function and reduced symptoms in patients with stable COPD in a 12-week, randomised, double-blind study. Clinically meaningful improvement in CRQ scores was documented in significantly more patients treated with the combination of the 2 drugs than either salmeterol monotherapy or placebo. Inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily plus oral theophylline had additive effects on lung function, increased the proportion of symptom-free days and decreased requirements for as-needed salbutamol compared with either agent alone according to a pooled analysis of 2 multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies. CONCLUSION: When used at the optimal dosage, 50 microg twice daily, salmeterol provides symptomatic relief and improves lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Available evidence suggests that the drug is as effective as ipratropium bromide and more effective than oral theophylline in patients with COPD. Moreover salmeterol has additive effects when used in combination with inhaled ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline. These qualities make the drug suitable for first-line use in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy to manage symptoms.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Equivalent pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of ciclesonide with and without use of the AeroChamber Plus spacer for inhalation.

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid that provides safe and effective control of persistent asthma. Ciclesonide is administered as an aerosol solution in a metered-dose inhaler, using hydrofluoroalkane-134a as a propellant. It is activated in the lung to form its only active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). A spacer may be used in combination with the hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler (HFA-MDI) to maintain inhaled corticosteroid delivery to the lung in patients with poor inhalation technique. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the pharmacokinetics of des-CIC and ciclesonide are altered when a spacer is used for ciclesonide inhalation. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, 2-period crossover, single-center pharmacokinetic study was conducted in 30 patients with asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second > or = 70% predicted). A single dose of ciclesonide (320 microg ex-actuator; equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) was administered via the HFA-MDI with and without an AeroChamber Plus spacer (Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada). Serum concentrations of ciclesonide and des-CIC were measured before inhalation and at various intervals until 14 hours after treatment using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic properties of the active metabolite, des-CIC, were equivalent after inhalation of ciclesonide with and without the AeroChamber Plus spacer. Point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of des-CIC pharmacokinetic properties in the presence or absence of a spacer were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 (area under the serum concentration time curve from time zero to infinity 0.96 [0.85, 1.07]; peak serum concentration 1.05 [0.94, 1.18]; elimination half-life 1.04 [0.92, 1.18]). Furthermore, there was no relevant difference in the point estimate and 90% CI of the difference of the time to reach peak serum concentration of des-CIC with or without a spacer. CONCLUSION: The AeroChamber Plus spacer did not influence the pharmacokinetics of the pharmacologically active des-CIC. Thus, systemic exposure to the active metabolite is similar when ciclesonide is inhaled with or without a spacer. Furthermore, these results are indicative of comparable lung deposition of ciclesonide in both the presence and absence of a spacer.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

Inhaled fluticasone propionate. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma.

UNLABELLED: Contemporary asthma management guidelines list inhaled corticosteroids as the preferred controller medication for patients with persistent asthma. Despite the availability of explicit guidelines, there is evidence that these agents are underused and that guidelines are not always adhered to. Fluticasone propionate is one of several inhaled corticosteroids used for the treatment of asthma. Like other agents of its class, its efficacy is backed by extensive clinical data. More recently, the quality of life of recipients of fluticasone propionate and its relative cost effectiveness have been investigated. A series of comparative analyses show that inhaled fluticasone propionate is more cost effective than oral zafirlukast and triamcinolone acetonide and slightly more cost effective than flunisolide in adult patients with asthma. Analyses used cost per symptom-free day and/or cost per successfully treated patient as outcome measures and were generally conducted from the perspective of the third-party payer. When administered at a microgram dose of half or less than budesonide (as is therapeutically appropriate), the cost effectiveness of fluticasone propionate was similar to or better than that of budesonide. In children, fluticasone propionate was more cost effective per treatment success compared with inhaled sodium cromoglycate. Quality-of-life assessments in patients with mild to moderate disease show that inhaled fluticasone propionate achieved improvements which were deemed to be clinically meaningful in patients with mild to moderate asthma; these changes were significantly greater than those achieved with oral zafirlukast, inhaled triamcinolone acetonide or placebo. Greater improvements were evident with inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the considerable body of clinical evidence supporting the use of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma, accumulating short term cost-effectiveness data also suggest that this agent can be administered for a similar or lower cost per outcome than other inhaled corticosteroids or oral zafirlukast. Importantly, the clinical benefits offered by fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma are accompanied by clinically significant improvements in quality of life.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Economic assessment of adjustable maintenance treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus fixed treatment in asthma.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs and effectiveness of adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus fixed dosing in adults with asthma. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial conducted in Germany, patients with asthma received budesonide/formoterol 160 microg/4.5 microg in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler with two inhalations twice daily for a 4-week run-in period. Patients were then randomised to either adjustable maintenance dosing (one inhalation twice daily, stepping up to four inhalations twice daily for 1 week if asthma worsened; n=1679) or fixed dosing (two inhalations twice daily; n=1618) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), measured using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (standardised) during the randomised treatment period. Resource utilisation data were collected in parallel and combined with German unit costs to estimate direct and indirect costs (year 2001 values). RESULTS: Both treatment regimens were equally effective in maintaining HR-QOL and asthma control during the randomised treatment period. However, overall, patients in the adjustable maintenance dosing group took fewer daily inhalations of budesonide/formoterol than those in the fixed-dosing group (mean: 2.63 vs 3.82 inhalations; p<0.001). Adjustable maintenance dosing was associated with significantly lower asthma-related direct costs compared with fixed dosing (mean: 221 euro vs 292 euro; p<0.001). This pattern was maintained when patients were stratified into those with peak expiratory flow (PEF) of 60% to <80% predicted normal and those with PEF of>/=80% predicted normal and when total costs were considered. CONCLUSION: Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler maintained HR-QOL in adult patients with asthma at a significantly lower cost than fixed dosing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Treatment satisfaction with inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with type 1 diabetes, glycemic control can be achieved as effectively with an inhaled insulin regimen, comprising preprandial inhaled intrapulmonary insulin plus a bedtime ultralente injection, as with a conventional subcutaneous insulin regimen involving two to three injections per day. Our objective was to compare patient satisfaction between inhaled insulin and subcutaneous insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with type 1 diabetes participated in a 12-week open-label trial and were randomized to either an inhaled insulin regimen or a subcutaneous insulin regimen. Subjects (n = 69) were asked to complete a 15-item self-administered satisfaction questionnaire, the Patient Satisfaction with Insulin Therapy (PSIT) Questionnaire, at baseline and week 12. Outcomes included mean percentage changes in global (overall) satisfaction and two subscales: convenience/ease of use and social comfort. RESULTS: The mean percentage improvement in overall satisfaction with inhaled insulin (35.1%, 95% CI 18.0-52.2) was greater than with subcutaneous insulin (10.6%, 4.7-16.5) (P < 0.01), as was the improvement in convenience/ease of use: inhaled insulin 41.3% (22.9-59.6) versus subcutaneous insulin 11.2% (4.1-18.3; P < 0.01). Improvement in social comfort was greater with inhaled insulin but was not statistically significant. The 12-week change in HbA(1c) was associated with improved overall satisfaction (r = -0.27, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled insulin may offer the first practical, noninvasive alternative to insulin injections. For patients with type 1 diabetes, inhaled insulin maintains glycemic control and provides greater overall satisfaction and convenience/ease of use than subcutaneous insulin.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin (exubera) compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial.

OBJECTIVE: Glycemic control using inhaled, dry-powder insulin plus a single injection of long-acting insulin was compared with a conventional regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes, which was previously managed with at least two daily insulin injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to 6 months' treatment with either premeal inhaled insulin plus a bedtime dose of Ultralente (n = 149) or at least two daily injections of subcutaneous insulin (mixed regular/NPH insulin; n = 150). The primary efficacy end point was the change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of study. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased similarly in the inhaled (-0.7%) and subcutaneous (-0.6%) insulin groups (adjusted treatment group difference: -0.07%, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.17). HbA1c < 7.0% was achieved in more patients receiving inhaled (46.9%) than subcutaneous (31.7%) insulin (odds ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.24-4.14). Overall hypoglycemia (events per subject-month) was slightly lower in the inhaled (1.4 events) than in the subcutaneous (1.6 events) insulin group (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97), with no difference in severe events. Other adverse events, with the exception of increased cough in the inhaled insulin group, were similar. No difference in pulmonary function testing was seen. Further studies are underway to assess tolerability in the longer term. Insulin antibody binding increased more in the inhaled insulin group. Treatment satisfaction was greater in the inhaled insulin group. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled insulin appears to be effective, well tolerated, and well accepted in patients with type 2 diabetes and provides glycemic control comparable to a conventional subcutaneous regimen.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intratracheal instillation versus intratracheal-inhalation of tracer particles for measuring lung clearance function.

Effective elimination of particles deposited in the respiratory tract is an important defense function to protect the organism from potentially adverse effects of inhaled particles. Delivery of radioactively labeled tracer particles and subsequent measurement in vivo of their retention in different regions of the respiratory tract provides an adequate method for characterizing this defensive function. However, the delivery of such tracer particles by inhalation may result in some external contamination of the animals and requires specific protective measures while working with radioactive aerosols. In this study, 85Sr-labeled tracer particles (3 microns) were administered to the lower respiratory tract of rats by intratracheal inhalation to avoid external contamination, and also by intratracheal instillation in order to compare the 2 technique with respect to their suitability for measuring normal and impaired particle clearance rates. It was postulated that particle clearance function in the alveolar region can be determined equally well with intratracheally instilled particles despite their uneven distribution in the lung. For both techniques, rats were anesthesized with halothane and the particles were administered via oral intubation. Retention in the lower respiratory tract of about 30 micrograms (inhalation) and 6 micrograms (instillation) of the administered particles was followed over a period of 180 days by external counting of lung 85Sr-activity in a collimated detection system. To impair alveolar particle clearance rates, groups of rats were subjected to 12 weeks of inhalation exposure prior to delivery of the tracer particles as follows: (1) sham-exposed control; (2) pigment-grade TiO2 particles to induce lung overload: (3) ultrafine TiO2 particles: (4) crystalline SiO2 particles (cristobalite). The following results were obtained: The long-term retention half-times (T1/2) of the tracer particles reflecting alveolar clearance consistently showed the same ranking of the treatment groups whether measured after intratracheal inhalation or instillation. Control values were 66 and 72 days, respectively, and significantly prolonged long-term clearance was measured by both methods for pigment-grade TiO2 (117 and 99 days), ultrafine TiO2 (541 and 600 days) and SiO2 (1901 and 1368 days). Comparison of these values between the two modes of administration of tracer particles showed no significant differences. In contrast, the short-term T1/2 (mucociliary clearance) of the intratracheally instilled tracer particles in the different treatment groups were variable and did not accurately reflect particle clearance from the conducting airways. However, short-term T1/2 after intratracheal inhalation of tracer particles were consistent with fast conducting airway clearance, and mucociliary clearance appears to be stimulated when alveolar clearance is significantly impaired due to particle overload or to effects of cytotoxic particles. The results suggest that intratracheal instillation of a low dose (< or = 10 micrograms) of tracer particles in the rat provides an adequate method for reliably determining effects of inhaled toxicants on alveolar particle clearance function. Further, intratracheal inhalation of tracer particles is useful for measuring both short-term (mucociliary) and long-term (alveolar) particle clearance rates in the lower respiratory tract of the rat.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Combined effects of inhaled nitric oxide and a recruitment maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Nitric oxide (NO) inhalation therapy has been employed in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in order to improve oxygenation. Several factors have been implicated as being responsible for the action of inhaled NO. Alveolar recruitment methods, such as prone positioning and a sufficient positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), have been identified as having a positive impact on the NO response. A Recruitment maneuver (RM) was introduced for the treatment of ARDS, along with a lung protective strategy. Here, we hypothesized that a RM may further augment the oxygenation of patients treated with NO inhalation. Therefore, the effects of the inhalation of NO, either in combination with a RM, or separately, were evaluated on patients with ARDS for their enhancing action. 23 patients with ARDS were enrolled, and divided into three groups. The patients in group 1 (n=11) were treated with 5 ppm NO via inhalation, followed by a RM, applying a sustained inflation pressure of 30 - 35 cmH2O for 30 seconds. Group 2 (n=6) received a RM alone, while group 3 (n=3) was treated with NO inhalation alone. The oxygenation and hemodynamic parameters were obtained prior to, and 2, 12, and 24 h after, the respective treatment procedures. For group 1, the PaO2/FiO2 increased from its initial value of 171.8 +/- 67.8 to 203.2 +/- 90.0 2 h after NO inhalation. Further improvement was noted with the continual application of the RM reaching, 215.5 +/- 74.6 (p=0.05) and 254.2 +/- 109.5 (p < 0.05), after 12 and 24 h, respectively. Initially 7 of the subjects did not respond to NO inhalation, but 3 of these non-responders changed into responders 12 h after the RM. The changes in the PaO2/FiO2 from baseline at each time period were greater in group 1 than in the other groups, but with no statistical significance. The hemodynamics of the patients was not significantly altered during the entire study period. We conclude that the combined application of NO inhalation and a RM could be beneficial and safe for patients with ARDS, showing an enhancing effect in improvement of oxygenation.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Inhaled insulin improves glycemic control when substituted for or added to oral combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes who do not achieve glycemic control with oral agent therapy eventually require insulin. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect on glycemic control of inhaled insulin alone or added to dual oral therapy (insulin secretagogue and sensitizer) after failure of dual oral therapy. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: 48 outpatient centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: 309 patients with type 2 diabetes, no clinically significant respiratory disease, and hemoglobin A(1c) level of 8% to 11% who were receiving dual oral therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Primary end point was change in hemoglobin A(1c) level from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin A(1c) level less than 8% and less than 7%, hypoglycemia, weight, lipid levels, pulmonary function, insulin antibody binding, and adverse events. INTERVENTION: Inhaled insulin (Exubera; Pfizer Inc. [New York, New York], sanofi-aventis Group [Paris, France], and Nektar Therapeutics [San Carlos, California]), titrated to blood glucose, administered alone (n = 104) or added to dual oral agents (n = 103) versus oral therapy alone (n = 99). RESULTS: Reductions in hemoglobin A(1c) level were greater with inhaled insulin. Adjusted treatment group differences for inhaled insulin plus oral agents and inhaled insulin alone compared with continued oral agent therapy were -1.67 percentage points (95% CI, -1.90 to -1.44 percentage points; P < 0.001) and -1.18 percentage points (CI, -1.41 to -0.95 percentage point; P < 0.001), respectively. Hemoglobin A(1c) level less than 7% was achieved by 32% (inhaled insulin plus oral agents) and by 1% (oral agent therapy) of patients (adjusted odds ratio, 44.7 [CI, 6.0 to 335.2]). Hypoglycemia, mild weight gain, mild cough, and insulin antibodies were more frequent with inhaled insulin than with oral agent therapy alone. Pulmonary function was similar in all groups. LIMITATIONS: This study evaluated only patients with hemoglobin A1c levels of 8% to 11%, did not compare inhaled insulin with other insulins or oral therapy except a dual regimen of secretagogue and sensitizer, and lasted only 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled insulin improved overall glycemic control and hemoglobin A1c level when added to or substituted for dual oral agent therapy with an insulin secretagogue and sensitizer. Consistent with other insulin therapies, hypoglycemia and mild weight gain occurred. Pulmonary function showed no between-group differences.

Administration, Inhalation↗