[Tumors of the digestive system in our patient material].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We have previously reported the clinical effects of NF therapy (NCS + 5-FU) and NFO therapy (NCS + 5-FU + Picibanil) on patients with advanced carcinoma of the digestive organs. In the present study, (NHO therapy (NCS + HCFU + Picibanil) performed in 41 patients and 30 patients were evaluated for its clinical effects. In comparison with NHO, NF and NFO, partial regression (tumor regression exceeding 50%) was noted in 5 of 30 patients (16.7%) on NHO, which was superior to 7.4% on NF, but slightly inferior to 18.8% on NFO. However, six and twelve month survival rate and 50% survival month on NHO therapy were 31.6%, 10.5% and 4.6 months, respectively and they were superior to those of NF and NFO therapy. Though the incidence of the adverse effects by NHO was almost identical with that of NFO and not more frequent than that of NF therapy. Urinary frequency, hot sensation and urgency due to HCFU administration were observed approximately in 10% on NFO therapy. In the three modalities the advantageous clinical effects on patients with hepatic carcinoma irrespective of primary or metastatic were observed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.