Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47Linked to original sources

Abdominal differential diagnosis in a patient referred to a physical therapy clinic for low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Resident's case problem. BACKGROUND: Acute back pain most often presents as musculoskeletal in nature; however, less frequently it may be the result of an underlying, or coexisting, systemic pathology. When present, the signs and symptoms of systemic pathology can mimic, or be masked by, musculoskeletal back pain, which may pose a diagnostic challenge during the clinical evaluation. The purpose of this resident's case problem is to describe the clinical reasoning process leading to a medical referral for a patient who presented to physical therapy with debilitating low back pain. DIAGNOSIS: The patient in this resident's case problem was a 67-year-old male referred to physical therapy with a 2-week history of severe low back pain and muscle spasms. The patient history and physical examination were suggestive of musculoskeletal back pain and physical therapy treatment was initiated. Abdominal pain was elicited during an introductory therapeutic exercise, which was recognized by the therapist as a potential sign of abdominal pathology. The therapist performed an additional review of systems and an abdominal screening examination, which established the necessity of an immediate medical referral. At the emergency department, ominous abdominal pathology was safely ruled out through diagnostic imaging and the patient was treated for secondary gastrointestinal effects of opioid analgesic medications. DISCUSSION: This resident's case problem provides an opportunity to discuss the clinical reasoning process leading to the suspicion of abdominal pathology. Specifically, this case reinforces the importance of recognizing potential signs of systemic pathology, executing an appropriate physical examination, including screening of the involved anatomical region, and providing an appropriate medical referral when indicated.

Abdominal Pain↗

Patient educational material in the management of low back pain in primary care.

Distributing educational material about low back pain to patients is increasingly seen as a possible adjunct to clinical management and a potential means of reducing the risk of the progression of the disorder toward chronic disability. Most back pain is managed in the primary care setting, where such material could save time and support the efforts of these practitioners. Recent evidence-based clinical guidelines for acute low back pain in U.S. and U.K. have advocated the use of educational material, but most of the available booklets are based on traditional biomedical theory about back pain and are neither evidence-based nor in line with recent guidelines. The few of these booklets that have been tested have had inconsistent effects. A new booklet has been developed which is evidence-based, in line with recent guidelines, and states its messages in a firm, uncluttered, and unambiguous manner. Preliminary studies show that it is readily accepted by patients, that they understand the messages, and that it creates a positive shift in beliefs about low back pain. Further studies regarding the use of this booklet are required to determine its effect on clinical outcomes.

Humans↗

Low back pain in hospital outpatients in Lomé (Togo).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the patterns of low back pain and the conditions associated with this symptom in outpatients attending the rheumatology unit of the Lomé Teaching Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of patients seen over a ten-year period were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Among the 9,065 patients seen during the study period, 3,204 (35.34%; 1,850 women and 1,354 men) had low back pain. Mean age at onset was 41 years, and mean duration of low back pain was three years. Diseases associated with low back pain were as follows: degenerative spinal disease, N = 3,054 (95.32%); spinal infections, N = 79 (2.47%); spondyloarthropathies, N = 44 (1.37%); and tumors, N = 27 (0.84%). The patterns of degenerative spinal disease included low back pain (N = 1,535, 47.91%), low back pain with nerve root pain suggestive of disk herniation (N = 1,108, 34.58%), and low back pain with nerve root pain and claudication suggestive of lumbar spinal stenosis (N = 411, 12.83%). Schöber's index was abnormal in 831 of the 1,408 patients (59%) with acute pain or disk herniation. Most patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were women (72.26%) and were aged 35 to 64 years. Findings suggestive of tuberculosis were present in 62 of the 79 patients with lumbar spinal infection. Among the 44 patients with spondyloarthropathies, 15 had ankylosing spondylitis and 11 had infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Multiple myeloma was present in ten patients and metastatic tumors in eight. CONCLUSION: Low back pain seems to be as common in sub-Saharan Africa as in occidental countries, with a prevalence of one-third among rheumatology outpatients. Lumbar spinal stenosis seems more common than in the occident and is mainly observed in woman. Schöber's index is not useful for measuring forward bending of the lumbar spine in Africans. The epidemiology of spondyloarthropathies in sub-Saharan Africa has been changed by the expanding HIV epidemic, despite the low prevalence of the HLA B27 phenotype.

Adult↗

Physical performance, pain, pain behavior and subjective disability in patients with subacute low back pain.

The aim of this paper was to study the physical performance, pain, pain behavior and disability in patients with subacute low back pain (LBP). The patients were blue-collar workers and had been sick-listed for 8 weeks due to subacute low back pain. A total of 103 patients were randomized, 51 of them to the intervention group and the other to a control group. Recordings of physical performance and complaints of LBP were done before and after treatment in the intervention group. The proportion of patients with no complaints of LBP was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group at the one-year follow-up. The patients who intra-individually improved their physical performance also intra-individually decreased their complaints of LBP. The intra-individual improvements were suggested to be important for the individual return to work.

Adult↗

Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar supports are used in the treatment of low back pain patients to make the impairment and disability vanish or decrease. Lumbar supports are also used to prevent the onset of low back pain (primary prevention) or to prevent recurrences of a low back pain episode (secondary prevention). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of non-specific low back pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Medline, Cinahl and Current Contents databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to September 1999, and the Embase database up to September 1998. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified controlled trials, and used Science Citation Index to identify additional controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled clinical trials that reported on any type of lumbar supports as preventive or therapeutic intervention for non-specific low back pain were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted data from the trials considering characteristics of the study population, characteristics of the interventions and the final results for each outcome measure. The reviewer compared these findings to data regarding the same characteristics of the same studies published already in other reviews. The methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. Because it was not possible to perform a quantitative analysis, a qualitative meta-analysis was performed in which the strength of evidence on the effectiveness of lumbar supports was classified as being strong, moderate, limited or conflicting, and no evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Five randomized and two nonrandomized controlled preventive trials and six randomized therapeutic trials were included in our review. Overall the methodological quality of the studies included in our review was rather low. Only four of the thirteen studies scored positive on 50% or more of the the internal validity items. There was moderate evidence that for primary prevention lumbar supports are not more effective than other types of treatment or no intervention. No evidence was found on the effectiveness of lumbar supports for secondary prevention. The systematic review of therapeutic trials showed that there is limited evidence that lumbar supports are more effective than no treatment, while it is still unclear if lumbar supports are more effective than other interventions for treatment of low back pain. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is still a need for high quality randomised trials on the effectiveness of lumbar supports. One of the most essential issues to tackle in these future trials seems to be the realisation of an adequate compliance.

Braces↗

Low back pain among nurses: a follow-up beginning at entry to the nursing school.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of back pain from entering the nursing school through 5 years in nursing and the determinants and modifiers of back pain and disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physical loading, psychologic characteristics, and several other factors have been associated with back pain at work in earlier studies. Because of the lack of the prework entry morbidity data, the nature of the associations between these exposures and the symptoms is unclear. That previous back pain is a predictor of later pain underlines the importance to have pre-employment data in investigations of the role of exposures at work. METHODS: Female nursing students (n = 174) were followed for 7.5 years. Data on constitutional and behavioral factors, occupational exposures, and back-related symptoms and disability were collected. Back pain was grouped into "sciatic," "sudden," or "other" and related disability. RESULTS: The lifetime cumulative prevalence of back pain increased from 31% at entry to nursing school to 72% at the end of the school and further to 82% after 5 years as a nurse. The 1-year prevalence of any back pain was 54% for the first year in nursing school, 57% for the first year as a nurse, and 64% for the fifth year as a nurse. In multivariate analyses, other back pain and related disability as a nurse were associated with back pain history at the entry to nursing school (odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-34; and 3.6; 1.2-11, respectively), and working in twisted/bent positions (odds ratio, 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-23; and 7.5; 2.9-20, respectively). Sudden back pain was not associated with any of the studied risk factors. Sciatic back pain was associated only with working positions (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-23). CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime prevalence of back pain increased sharply during nursing school but slowly after that. Back pain at entering the nursing school was a predictor for back-related pain and disability. Self- reported occupational physical work load was associated with back pain and related disability. The nature of the association is unclear, but it is likely that back pain is exacerbated during nursing.

Adult↗

Low back pain in elite cross-country skiers. A retrospective epidemiological study.

Low back pain is a common complaint among competitive cross-country skiers. Fifty-three top male and 34 female skiers in the age group 16-25 were interviewed with a questionnaire regarding anthropometric parameters, training variables, back pain and other injuries. The frequency of back pain was 64% in the whole group, men affected slightly more often than women. Back pain was defined as previous or present recurrent skiing correlated backache that more or less affected skiing ability. Diagonal skiing style was the most commonly back pain-inducing style, whereas no skier experienced back pain when "skating" only. The low back was the predominant location of pain. Anthropometric and training variables seemed to be of little value in predicting back pain.

Adolescent↗

Trunk muscle weakness as a risk factor for low back pain. A 5-year prospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: A 5-year prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate trunk muscle weakness as a risk factor for low back pain in asymptomatic volunteers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Muscle strength has not been sufficiently studied as a risk factor for low back pain. METHODS: The study participants included 30 male and 37 female volunteers (mean age, 17 +/- 2 years), who neither reported nor had ever been treated for low back pain. Trunk muscle strength was measured isokinetically (60 degrees/sec), using the trunk extension and flexion and torso rotation units. The peak torques of the volunteers' extension, flexion, rightward rotation, and leftward rotation were measured, and the agonist/antagonist ratios were calculated as extension/flexion and left rotation/right rotation ratio. The volunteers then were followed prospectively for 5 years to determine the incidence of low back pain and were classified into a non-low back pain group (volunteers with no low back pain during the 5-year follow-up period) and a low back pain group (volunteers who experienced low back pain during this period). RESULTS: The low back pain group consisted of 8 male and 10 female volunteers. There were no significant differences between the non-low back pain group and the low back pain group regarding age, height, weight, the peak torque values, or the left rotation/right rotation ratio. However, the extension/flexion ratio of the low back pain group (men, 0.96 +/- 0.27; women, 0.77 +/- 0.19) demonstrated significantly lower values than that of the non-low back pain group (1.23 +/- 0.28 and 1.00 +/- 0.16 for men and women, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An imbalance in trunk muscle strength, i.e., lower extensor muscle strength than flexor muscle strength, might be one risk factor for low back pain.

Adolescent↗

Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm interventional cohort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty to treat symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures (VCFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: VCFs treated nonoperatively can diminish function and quality of life, and lead to chronic health effects. The short-term safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic VCFs are well-documented, but long-term follow-up is needed. METHODS: A total of 155 elderly patients with symptomatic VCFs were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter treatment study of balloon kyphoplasty at 19 geographically diverse US centers. Outcomes included back pain severity, bedrest, and limited activities because of back pain, back disability score, and SF-36 Medical Outcomes Survey, at 7 days (visual analog scale only), and 1, 3, 12, and 24 months after treatment. RESULTS: Patients reported severe back pain (15/20 on visual analog scale) interfering with daily activities 90% of days per month before kyphoplasty. Physical functioning and quality of life were also markedly impaired. Statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvements occurred in all pain, functional, and mental health outcomes at the first follow-up after treatment and were maintained for 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with symptomatic VCFs had rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, back function, and quality of life following balloon kyphoplasty.

Aged↗

Epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of low back pain.

Epidemiologic studies report the prevalence of low back pain to vary from 7.6% to 37% in different populations. Genetic factors play an important role in the development of back pain and intervertebral disk degeneration in adults. An animal model of spinal fusion using osteoinductive growth factors has important implications for surgical spinal fusions in humans. Physical findings have significance in identifying patients with radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, and malingering. Magnetic resonance imaging differentiates metastatic spinal fractures from osteoporotic lesions. Clinical entities reviewed in the literature this year include herniated intervertebral disk-associated radiculopathy, facet joint syndrome, back pain during pregnancy, and spontaneous infectious diskitis. Primary care physicians do not follow published guidelines for treatment of low back pain. Surgical decompression of spinal stenosis is most successful for patients with severe disease.

Adult↗

Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures.

STUDY DESIGN: Postal questionnaire to individuals with back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability, validity, and reliability of two existing back pain outcome measures, the Roland-Morris Questionnaire and the Von Korff scales, modified to measure the preceding 4 weeks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ideal outcome measure for studies of low back pain and disability remains elusive. Most existing measures assess current pain and disability. Measuring these factors over a preceding 4-week period may be more appropriate. METHODS: Individuals with back pain identified in a community survey were asked to complete the modified questionnaires. Validity was assessed by comparison with the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 and two general comparator questions on self-reported pain and disability. Repeatability was assessed using retest questionnaires. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 95 individuals with chronic back pain. The modified Roland-Morris Questionnaire and Von Korff pain and Von Korff disability scales were completed satisfactorily by 83 (87%), 89 (94%), and 87 (92%) participants, respectively. Mean scores of the modified measures changed significantly and in a predictable manner with increasing ratings of pain and disability. They also correlated with aspects of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 questionnaire. Retest data suggest that these measures are repeatable. The modified Roland-Morris Questionnaire provided adequate analyzable data only if missing values were imputed, and it explained less of the variance in the comparator questions than the modified Von Korff scales. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Von Korff scales were completed easily and appear to be valid and repeatable in this format.

Adult↗

Gender differences in the cause of low back pain in British soldiers.

OBJECTIVES: To explore gender differences in the cause of low back pain in a population of military personnel who are expected to undertake high levels of sport, exercise and physical military training. METHODS: A prospective study of trained British soldiers, with symptomatic low back pain, referred to the Colchester Garrison Sports Injury and Rehabilitation Centre over a four year period. RESULTS: The study demonstrates that 928 (17.8%) of the 5214 referrals were for new cases of low back pain. The incidence of low back pain in female soldiers is higher than their male counterparts with an odds ratio of 3.17 (95% CI 2.31 - 4.35) There was a highly significant cross gender difference in low back pain caused by activities in the followining categories: military physical traininong (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.70 - 4.02), work or occupation (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.56 - 3.87) and off-duty pursuits (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.72 - 4.72). There was no cross gender difference in low back pain caused by sport, road traffic accidents or activities pre-dating military service. CONCLUSIONS: Female soldiers are significantly more likely to suffer low back pain as a result of physical military training, their occupation, or off-duty activities. Sporting activities do not cause low back pain in women to a greater extent than men By demonstrating the scale of the problem and by determining of the cause of injury, it should now be possible to propose methods of effective intervention to reduce injury, implement those interventions and audit effectiveness.

Adult↗

Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. OBJECTIVE: To estimate total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States, calculate the incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these individuals, and describe health care expenditure patterns of individuals with back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a lack of updated information on health care expenditures and expenditure patterns for individuals with back pain in the United States. METHODS: This study used data from the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a national survey on health care utilization and expenditures. Total health care expenditures and per-capita expenditures among individuals with back pain were calculated. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate the incremental expenditures attributable to back pain. The expenditure patterns were examined by stratifying individuals with back pain by sociodemographic characteristics and medical diagnosis, and calculating per-capita expenditures for each stratum. RESULTS: In 1998, total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States reached 90.7 billion dollars and total incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these persons were approximately 26.3 billion dollars. On average, individuals with back pain incurred health care expenditures about 60% higher than individuals without back pain (3,498 dollars vs. 2,178 dollars). Among back pain individuals, at least 75% of service expenditures were attributed to those with top 25% expenditure, and per-capita expenditures were generally higher for those who were older, female, white, medically insured, or suffered from disc disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Health care expenditures for back pain in the United States in 1998 were substantial. The expenditures demonstrated wide variations among individuals with different clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic characteristics.

Adolescent↗

Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated how age, sex, height, body weight, self-efficacy beliefs, pain, and subjective disability predict the performance of low back pain patients on an isokinetic trunk muscle test. METHODS: One hundred and five patients participated in the study. Dependent variables were isokinetic flexion and extension strength measured as total work done at speeds 50, 100, and 150 degrees/second. RESULTS: The anthropometric measures were poor predictors, height being the only significant one. Body weight and age were of no relevance for the performance. Subjective pain and disability had negative effects on the performance of men, but not of women. Self-efficacy beliefs, i.e., the patient's belief in his or her capability to endure physical activities, was the most powerful predictor. CONCLUSION: For the purpose of validation, standardization, and interpretation of isokinetic performance in low back pain patients, these factors should be taken into account.

Adult↗

Does the neurologist contribute to the care of patients with chronic back pain?

OBJECTIVE: To review the disposition and outcome of patients with back pain seen in a neurology clinic, and determine the value of the neurologist's input. BACKGROUND: Back pain is a common cause of referral to the neurology clinic, but it is not clear how much the neurologist contributes to the care of such patients. DESIGN/METHODS: We reviewed all new patients and new consultations seen for the following reasons: low back pain; 'sciatica'; 'back and leg pain', and 'spinal stenosis'. Patients were evaluated by a single attending neurologist at a general neurology clinic over a 2-year period (January 1997 through December 1998). RESULTS: During the 2-year period, there were 97 patients seen for the above reasons. The chief complaint was low back pain alone in 73, while it was combined with another symptom in 24 (leg pain in 18, buttock or hip pain in 6). Thirty-three patients were self-referred, 56 were referred by a healthcare professional, 3 were referred by attorneys, and the referral source was unclear in 5. Median age was (range 25-90) years. Forty-eight were males. Based on the clinical data (history and examination), clinical diagnoses were radiculopathy in 28, myelopathy in 2, uncomplicated spondylosis in 27, and other non-neurologic conditions in 45. Tests performed after the visit included X-rays in 31, CT in 1, MRI in 16, and EMG in 17. 'Final' diagnoses were radiculopathy in 29 patients, myelopathy in 2 (total neurologic n = 30), uncomplicated spondylosis in 27, and other non-neurologic diagnoses in 41 (total non-neurologic n = 67). The non-neurologic diagnoses included periarticular pain, bursitis, muscle strain, soft tissue injury, and vertebral compression fractures. Final dispositions in the non-neurologic group (n = 67) were: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) in 34 patients; analgesics or muscle relaxants in 37; physical therapy for 19, and none (including rest and observation) for 22. Four patients were referred for epidural blocks. (Many patients had more than one final disposition.) Final dispositions in the neurologic group (n = 39) were: physical therapy (n = 9); NSAIDs (n = 12); analgesics or muscle relaxants (n = 12), and epidural blocks (n = 3). Three patients were referred for surgery, but only 1 had an operation. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients with back pain and related symptoms seen in a neurology clinic, about two thirds have non-neurologic conditions. These patients are usually treated symptomatically with medications, rest, and physical therapy, all of which could be managed by primary care physicians. In the neurologic group, the vast majority is treated in the same way as the non-neurologic group. When more specific measures are needed, such as surgery or pain management procedures (e.g., epidural blocks), then the patients could be evaluated directly by the proper specialist (pain management or spine surgery) rather than the neurologist. The neurologist's input does not significantly affect the diagnosis or the management, so that the neurologist appears to have no useful role in the management of such patients.

Adult↗

Does obesity cause low back pain?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to review the recent literature on the association between obesity and low back pain, in an effort to determine whether weight control can be considered an appropriate treatment for low back pain, and whether obesity can be considered a primary etiology of low back pain. DATA SOURCES: We reviewed articles in English from 1970 to present on MEDLINE that listed both obesity and low back pain as key words. Because of the paucity of articles retrieved this way, we also reviewed the bibliographies of each article to draw more studies into our review. Our search generated only seven studies. A standard textbook of obesity was also utilized as a source of basic science of obesity. CONCLUSION: Our review of these articles revealed a possible association between obesity and low back pain only in the upper quintile of obesity, and no evidence of a temporal relationship between weight change and low back pain change. The studies reviewed failed to differentiate low back pain patients by diagnosis and failed to quantify the possible presence of emotional factors in obese low back pain patients. As an incidental finding, one study documented a significant correlation between smoking history and low back pain. We concluded that there is no evidence in the current literature to support obesity that is not in the highest quintile as a cause of low back pain. We recommended that a longitudinal study be done that subclassified obese low back pain patients by mechanical and psychological diagnosis.

Body Mass Index↗

Lumbar lordosis in acute and chronic low back pain patients.

Postural changes are sometimes a risk factor for low back pain. Abnormal posture creates a strain on ligaments and muscles that indirectly affects the curvature of the lumbar spine. This study was planned to investigate the relationship between the angles of the lower lumbar spine and spinal mobility in acute and chronic low back pain patients. Fifty patients (25 female, 25 male) with chronic low back pain and fifty (30 female, 20 male) with acute low back pain were included the study. Both groups were subjected to lumbosacral radiography in the lateral position while standing. Patients were assessed by parameters including spinal mobility, sacral inclination angle, lumbosacral angle, and sacral horizontal angle. Spinal mobility included the maximal range of motion of lumbar flexion and extension. The value of the sacral inclination angle was significantly higher and correlated with lumbar extension in chronic low back pain patients ( P<0.005, r=0.32). There was no statistical difference or correlation in lumbosacral and sacral horizontal angles and spinal mobility between the two groups ( P>0.05). Chronic low back pain affects the lower lumbar spine and limits the maximal range of;lumbar extension.

Acute Disease↗

Relationship of subjective disability with pain intensity, pain duration, pain location, and work-related factors in nonoperated patients with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: A cross-sectional study on patients with chronic low back pain to compare relationships between subjective disability and pain intensity, pain duration, pain location, and work-related factors. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: One hundred and seven outpatients with low back pain, with or without radiation to the legs, of at least 3 months' duration, were administered a comprehensive back patient questionnaire. The questionnaire included the Pain Disability Index (PDI) for the assessment of overall perceived disability and assessments of pain intensity, duration, and location and two pretested short-form work questionnaires. None of the patients had undergone a back operation. SETTING: Tertiary care center. RESULTS: There was evidence of significant interrelationships between the PDI and pain intensity (low back pain, r = 0.53, p < 0.001; leg pain, r = 0.32, p < 0.01; and buttock pain, r = 0.36, p < 0.01), pain location (significantly higher scores with distal pain radiation), and work-related factors (a work load sum score of r = 0.31, p < 0.01; significantly higher scores in patients on sick leave). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that subjective disability in patients with chronic low back pain overlaps with both pain and work-related factors. The observations support the multidimensionality of low back disability.

Adolescent↗