Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propofol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

The independent effect of propofol anesthesia on whole body protein metabolism in humans.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of general anesthesia with propofol in the absence of surgical stimulation on whole body protein metabolism. METHODS: Six unpremedicated patients were studied. General anesthesia included propofol (120 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), vecuronium bromide, and oxygen-enriched air. Changes in protein breakdown, protein oxidation, and synthesis were measured by an isotope dilution technique using a constant infusion of the stable isotope tracer L-[1-13C]leucine (0.008 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) before and during 100 min of propofol anesthesia. The plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, non-esterified fatty acids, and cortisol were measured before and during anesthesia. RESULTS: An isotopic steady state of plasma [1-13C]alpha-ketoisocaproate (taken to represent the intracellular leucine precursor pool enrichment for protein synthesis) and expired 13C-carbon dioxide were obtained before and during propofol infusion. Whole body protein breakdown decreased during propofol anesthesia by 6% (P < 0.05), whereas protein synthesis and oxidation did not change significantly. Plasma concentration of cortisol decreased after 90 min of propofol anesthesia (P < 0.05). No significant changes of plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, and non-esterified fatty acids occurred during propofol administration. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol anesthesia did not significantly affect whole body protein synthesis and oxidation but caused a small, although significant, decrease in whole body protein breakdown, possibly mediated through the suppression of plasma cortisol concentration.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Office-based surgery is becoming increasingly popular because of its cost-saving potential Both propofol and sevoflurane are commonly used in the ambulatory setting because of their favorable recovery profiles. This clinical investigation was designed to compare the clinical effects, recovery characteristics, and cost-effectiveness of propofol and sevoflurane when used alone or in combination for office-based anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred four outpatients undergoing superficial surgical procedures at an office-based surgical center were randomly assigned to one of three general anesthetic groups. In groups I and II, propofol 2 mg/kg was administered for induction followed by propofol 75-150 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (group I) or sevoflurane 1-2% (group II) with N2O 67% in oxygen for maintenance of anesthesia In group m, anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in combination with N2O 67% in oxygen. Local anesthetics were injected at the incision site before skin incision and during the surgical procedure. The recovery profiles, costs of drugs, and resources used, as well as patient satisfaction, were compared among the three treatment groups. RESULTS: Although early recovery variables (e.g., eye opening, response to commands, and sitting up) were similar in all three groups, the times to standing up and to be "home ready" were significantly prolonged when sevoflurane-N2O was used for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The time to tolerating fluids, recovery room stay, and discharge times were significantly decreased when propofol was used for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Similarly, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for rescue antiemetics were also significantly reduced after propofol anesthesia. Finally, the total costs and patient satisfaction were more favorable when propofol was used for induction and maintenance of office-based anesthesia CONCLUSION: Compared with sevoflurane-N2O, use of propofol-N2O for office-based anesthesia was associated with an improved recovery profile, greater patient satisfaction, and lower costs. There were significantly more patients who were dissatisfied with the sevoflurane anesthetic technique.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Forty-hertz midlatency auditory evoked potential activity predicts wakeful response during desflurane and propofol anesthesia in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Suppression of response to command commonly indicates unconsciousness and generally occurs at anesthetic concentrations that suppress or eliminate memory formation. The authors sought midlatency auditory evoked potential indices that successfully differentiated wakeful responsiveness and unconsciousness. METHODS: The authors correlated midlatency auditory evoked potential indices with anesthetic concentrations permitting and suppressing response in 22 volunteers anesthetized twice (5 days apart), with desflurane or propofol. They applied stepwise increases of 0.5 vol% end-tidal desflurane or 0.5 microg/ml target plasma concentration of propofol to achieve sedation levels just bracketing wakeful response. Midlatency auditory evoked potentials were recorded, and wakeful response was tested by asking volunteers to squeeze the investigator's hand. The authors measured latencies and amplitudes from raw waveforms and calculated indices from the frequency spectrum and the joint time-frequency spectrogram. They used prediction probability (PK) to rate midlatency auditory evoked potential indices and concentrations of end-tidal desflurane and arterial propofol for prediction of responsiveness. A PK value of 1.00 means perfect prediction and a PK of 0.50 means a correct prediction 50% of the time (e.g., by chance). RESULTS: The approximately 40-Hz power of the frequency spectrum predicted wakefulness better than all latency or amplitude indices, although not all differences were statistically significant. The PK values for approximately 40-Hz power were 0.96 during both desflurane and propofol anesthesia, whereas the PK values for the best-performing latency and amplitude index, latency of the Nb wave, were 0.86 and 0.88 during desflurane and propofol (P = 0.10 for -40-Hz power compared with Nb latency), and for the next highest, latency of the Pb wave, were 0.82 and 0.84 (P < 0.05). The performance of the best combination of amplitude and latency variables was nearly equal to that of approximately 40-Hz power. The approximately 40-Hz power did not provide a significantly better prediction than anesthetic concentration; the PK values for concentrations of desflurane and propofol were 0.91 and 0.94. Changes of 40-Hz power values of 20% (during desflurane) and 16% (during propofol) were associated with a change in probability of nonresponsiveness from 50% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The approximately 40-Hz power index and the best combination of amplitude and latency variables perform as well as predictors of response to command during desflurane and propofol anesthesia as the steady-state concentrations of these anesthetic agents. Because clinical conditions may limit measurement of steady-state anesthetic concentrations, or comparable estimates of cerebral concentration, the approximately 40-Hz power could offer advantages for predicting wakeful responsiveness.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Differential neurotoxic effects of propofol on dissociated cortical cells and organotypic hippocampal cultures.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is a widely used anesthetic agent for adults and children. Although extensive clinical use has demonstrated its safety, neurologic dysfunctions have been described after the use of this agent. A recent study on a model of aggregating cell cultures reported that propofol might cause irreversible lesions of gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABAergic) neurons when administered at a critical phase of brain development. We investigated this issue by comparing the effects of long-term propofol treatment on two models of brain cultures: dissociated neonatal cortical cell cultures and organotypic slice cultures. METHODS: Survival of GABAergic neurons in dissociated cultures of newborn rat cortex (postnatal age, 1 day) treated for 3 days with different concentrations of propofol was assessed using histologic and cytochemical methods. For hippocampal organotypic slice cultures (postnatal age, 1 and 7 days), cell survival was assessed by measuring functional and morphologic parameters: extracellular and intracellular electrophysiology, propidium staining of dying cells, and light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: In dissociated neonatal cell cultures, propofol induced dose-dependent lesions of GABAergic neurons and of glial cells. In contrast, no evidence for neurotoxic effects of propofol were found after long-term treatment of organotypic slice cultures. Excitatory transmission was not affected by propofol, and inhibitory transmission was still functional. Histologic preparations showed no evidence for cell degeneration or death. CONCLUSION: Although long-term applications of propofol to dissociated cortical cell cultures produced degeneration and death of GABAergic neurons and glial cells, no such lesions were found when using a model of postnatal organotypic slice cultures. This conclusion is based on both functional and morphologic tests.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2000

Omission of nitrous oxide from a propofol-based anesthetic does not affect the recovery of women undergoing outpatient gynecologic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although nitrous oxide (N2O) is used commonly during anesthesia, clinically relevant advantages-disadvantages of using this agent are not well established in the ambulatory setting. This study in women undergoing ambulatory gynecologic surgery compares outcomes in patients administered total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus the propofol plus N2O. The primary outcome was the time to home readiness. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postanesthetic adverse events. METHODS: Women presenting for elective ambulatory termination of pregnancy or gynecologic laparoscopy were induced with an intravenous sleep dose of propofol and fentanyl. After induction, subjects were randomly allocated to maintenance anesthesia with propofol alone or propofol plus 65% N2O. Patients were assessed by a blinded observer in the postanesthetic care unit at 20-min intervals to determine home readiness. Postoperative pain and nausea were measured with visual analog scales. Postoperative analgesics and antiemetics were recorded. The incidence of adverse events occurring after hospital discharge was assessed by a telephone interview 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 740 patients received propofol alone, and 750 patients received propofol plus N2O. Mean home readiness times were not significantly different between treatment groups. There were no significant differences between groups in pain scores, nausea scores, analgesia administration, or antiemetic administration before discharge. There were no significant differences in the frequency of adverse events for 24 h after discharge from hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of N2O from a propofol-based anesthetic for ambulatory gynecologic surgery does not affect time to home readiness or the incidence of postoperative adverse events up to 24 h after discharge from hospital. (Key words: Awareness; outpatient surgery; total intravenous anesthesia.)

Abortion, Legal↗
PubMed2000

Propofol selectively attenuates endothelium-dependent pulmonary vasodilation in chronically instrumented dogs.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate the effects of propofol anesthesia on the pulmonary vascular response to endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilators, compared with the responses measured in the conscious state. METHODS: Twenty-six conditioned, male, mongrel dogs were instrumented long-term to measure the left pulmonary vascular pressure-flow relation. Pressure-flow plots were measured on separate days in conscious and propofol-anesthetized (5.0 mg/kg plus 0.5 mg. kg-1. min-1 intravenously) dogs at baseline, after preconstriction with the thromboxane mimetic U46619, and during the cumulative intravenous administration of endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine and bradykinin) and -independent (proline-nitric oxide) vasodilators. RESULTS: Propofol had no effect on the baseline pressure-flow relation compared with the conscious state. A lower (P < 0.05) dose of U46619 was necessary to achieve the same degree of preconstriction during propofol anesthesia. The pulmonary vasodilator responses to bradykinin and proline-nitric oxide were similar in the conscious and propofol-anesthetized states. In contrast, the pulmonary vasodilator response to acetylcholine was markedly attenuated (P < 0.01) during propofol anesthesia. The intralipid vehicle for propofol had no effect on the acetylcholine dose-response relation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that propofol causes a specific defect in the signal transduction pathway for acetylcholine-induced pulmonary vasodilation. This defect involves the endothelial and not the vascular smooth muscle component of the response.

15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5↗
PubMed2000

Predictive accuracy of target-controlled propofol and sufentanil coinfusion in long-lasting surgery.

BACKGROUND: The predictive accuracy of target concentration infusions of propofol has been documented only for less than 4 h, and no prospective study of sufentanil target controlled infusion is available. The authors investigated the predictive accuracy of pharmacokinetic models for propofol and sufentanil coadministered during long-lasting surgery. METHODS: Ten patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, were studied during extended cervicofacial surgery. Target controlled infusion of propofol and sufentanil was administered during surgery using decisional algorithms, taking into consideration pain assessment, hemodynamic changes, and peroperative blood losses. Intrasubject data analysis included calculation of performance error, median performance error, median absolute performance error, divergence, and wobble. RESULTS: The range of plasma target concentrations was 2-5 microgram/ml for propofol and 0.2-1 ng/ml for sufentanil. Median performance error was -12.1% for propofol and -10% for sufentanil. The wobble values were 11.6% and 22.3% for propofol and sufentanil, respectively. The pharmacokinetic sets used slightly overpredicted the concentrations, with negative values of divergence of 2.92% and 0.22% units/h for propofol and sufentanil, for a mean infusion period of 762 min. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrates the predictive accuracy of the pharmacokinetic model for sufentanil infusion and confirms that for propofol during long-lasting surgery using standardized rules for the management of target controlled infusion and blood loss replacement.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The role of human lungs in the biotransformation of propofol.

BACKGROUND: The metabolism of propofol is very rapid, and its transformation takes place mainly in the liver. There are reports indicating extrahepatic metabolism of the drug, and the alimentary canal, kidneys, and lungs are mentioned as the most probable places where the process occurs. The aim of this study was to determine whether the human lungs really take part in the process of propofol biotransformation. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 55 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1-3 scheduled for elective intracranial procedures (n = 47) or for pulmonectomy (n = 8). All patients were premedicated with diazepam (10 mg) administered orally 2 h before anesthesia. Propofol total intravenous anesthesia was performed at the following infusion rates: 12 mg. kg-1. h-1, 9 mg. kg-1. h-1, and 6 mg. kg-1. h-1. Fentanyl and pancuronium bromide were also administered intermittently. After tracheal intubation, the lungs were ventilated to normocapnia with an oxygen-air mixture (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.33). Blood samples for propofol and 2,6-diisopropyl-1, 4-quinol analysis were taken simultaneously from the right atrium and the radial artery, or the pulmonary artery and the radial artery. The concentration of both substances were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy. RESULTS: The concentration of propofol in the central venous system (right atrium or pulmonary artery) is greater than in the radial artery, whereas the opposite is observed for propofol's metabolite, 2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol. Higher propofol concentrations are found in blood taken from the pulmonary artery than in the blood collected from the radial artery. CONCLUSIONS: Human lungs take part in the elimination of propofol by transforming the drug into 2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2001

Mechanisms of direct inhibitory action of propofol on uterine smooth muscle contraction in pregnant rats.

BACKGROUND: Although propofol directly inhibits uterine smooth muscle contraction, the mechanisms of this effect are still unknown. The current study aimed to clarify the mechanisms of the inhibitory effect of propofol on oxytocin-induced uterine smooth muscle contraction by measuring (1) the concentration of intracellular free Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i)) simultaneously with muscle tension, (2) the amount of intracellular inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate ([IP(3)](i)), and (3) voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channel (VDCC) activity. METHODS: Uterine smooth muscle tissues were obtained from pregnant rats (in late gestation). [Ca(2+)](i) with isometric tension was monitored by the 500-nm light emission ratio of preloaded Ca(2+) indicator fura-2. [IP(3)](i) and VDCC activity were measured by radioimmunoassay and patch clamp techniques, respectively. The uterine smooth muscle was stimulated by 20 nm oxytocin and exposed to propofol (10(-7) approximately 10(-4) m). RESULTS: Propofol had significant inhibitory effects on oxytocin-induced uterine smooth muscle contraction and increased [Ca(2+)](i) in pregnant rats in a dose-dependent manner, without affecting the agonist-receptor binding affinity. Propofol inhibited the increase in [IP(3)](i) induced by oxytocin. Propofol also inhibited VDCC activity in both activated and inactivated states. The solvent Intralipid had no effects on these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol inhibits oxytocin-induced uterine smooth muscle contraction, at least in part, by decreasing [Ca(2+)](i) without affecting agonist-receptor binding; the inhibitory effect of propofol on [Ca(2+)](i) might be mediated both by a decrease in [IP(3)](i) and by inhibition of VDCC activity.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2003

Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on heart rate variability.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is reported to reduce both sympathetic and parasympathetic tone; however, it is not clear whether the changes in heart rate variability are associated with depth of anesthesia. The purposes of the present study were (1) to evaluate the changes in heart rate variability at different depths of hypnosis and (2) to compare the effects of propofol on heart rate variability with that of sevoflurane. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly allocated into the propofol or sevoflurane for induction of anesthesia. The depth of hypnosis was monitored by the Bispectral Index (BIS). Spectral analysis of heart rate variability using a maximum-entropy method resulted in a characteristic power spectrum with two main regions, a high frequency (HF) and a low frequency (LF). Hemodynamics, entropy, LF, HF, and LF/HF were monitored when the patients were awake and after induction of anesthesia. RESULTS: Both propofol and sevoflurane decreased blood pressure in a BIS-dependent manner, whereas heart rate showed no significant changes during the study period. In the propofol group, entropy and HF decreased with a reduction in the BIS value. Although LF decreased after induction of anesthesia, propofol caused no further decrease in LF in spite of a reduction in the BIS value. In the sevoflurane group, LF decreased with a reduction in the BIS value. Entropy and HF decreased after induction of anesthesia (BIS at 80); however, no further decreases were observed in spite of a reduction in the BIS value. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of anesthesia with propofol decreased blood pressure, entropy, and HF in a BIS-dependent manner, indicating that propofol reduces cardiac parasympathetic tone depending on the depth of hypnosis. Conversely, sevoflurane did not show the BIS-dependent decreases in heart rate, blood pressure, HF, and entropy, indicating that sevoflurane has little or no effect on cardiac parasympathetic tone.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of intracarotid and intravenous propofol for electrocerebral silence in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: The high lipid solubility that permits rapid transfer across the blood-brain barrier makes propofol attractive for intracarotid injection. The authors hypothesized that intracarotid injection produces electrocerebral silence at a fraction of the intravenous dose and with less adverse systemic and cerebrovascular side effects. METHODS: The authors compared the systemic and cerebrovascular effects of intracarotid and intravenous propofol during transient (10 s) and sustained (1 h) electrocerebral silence in anesthetized New Zealand White rabbits. Hemispheric electrocerebral activity, mean arterial blood pressure, ipsilateral and contralateral cerebral blood flow, tympanic temperature, and end-tidal carbon dioxide were continuously monitored in these animals. Changes in outcome variables were analyzed at four time points: at baseline, during electrical silence, during burst suppression, and after recovery of electrocerebral activity. Propofol (1%) was injected as intracarotid (0.1 ml) or intravenous (0.5 ml) boluses. RESULTS: Intracarotid propofol produced electrocerebral silence at one fifth (sustained silence) to one tenth (transient silence) of the intravenous dose. Compared with baseline values, the mean arterial pressure and ipsilateral cerebral blood flow remained unchanged or decreased transiently during electrocerebral silence with intracarotid propofol. In contrast, intravenous propofol resulted in systemic hypotension and a decrease in ipsilateral cerebral blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Intracarotid propofol resulted in electrocerebral silence at a fraction of the intravenous dose that was not associated with systemic hypotension or a sustained decrease in the cerebral blood flow. Intracarotid propofol could be potentially useful for providing electrocerebral silence when cerebral perfusion is at risk.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Influence of fluid infusion associated with high-volume blood loss on plasma propofol concentrations.

BACKGROUND: It is common clinical practice to use fluid infusion to manage high-volume blood loss until a blood transfusion is performed. The authors investigated the influence of fluid infusion associated with blood loss on the pseudo-steady state propofol concentration. METHODS: Twenty-seven swine were assigned to a lactated Ringer's solution group, a hydroxyethyl starch group, or a threefold lactated Ringer's solution group (n = 9 in each group). After 180 min of steady state infusion of propofol at a rate of 2 mg.kg(-1).h(-1), hemorrhage and infusion were induced by stepwise bleeding followed by fluid infusion every 30 min. In each of the first two steps, 400 ml blood was collected; thereafter, 200 ml was collected at each step. Just after each bleeding step, fluid infusion was rapidly performed using a volume of lactated Ringer's solution or hydroxyethyl starch equivalent to the blood withdrawn, or a threefold volume of lactated Ringer's solution. Hemodynamic parameters and the plasma propofol concentration were recorded at each step. RESULTS: Although the plasma propofol concentration in the lactated Ringer's solution group increased with hemorrhage and infusion, it decreased in both the hydroxyethyl starch and the threefold lactated Ringer's solution groups. The propofol concentration in the hydroxyethyl starch group could be expressed by the following equation: Plasma Propofol Concentration Decrease (%) = 0.80 x Hematocrit Decrease (%) (r2 = 0.83, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When high-volume blood loss is managed by isovolemic hemodilution, the plasma propofol concentration during continuous propofol infusion decreases linearly with the hematocrit decrease.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Propofol: the challenges of formulation.

Propofol is a potent lipophilic anesthetic that was initially formulated in Cremophor El for human use. Because of the occurrence of Cremophor EL anaphylaxis and improvements in the quality of lipid emulsions, it was ultimately brought to market as 1% propofol formulated in 10% soybean oil emulsion. Emulsions represent complex formulation compositions whose suitability for intravenous administration is dependent on a number of factors. Despite the success of propofol emulsions, drawbacks to such formulations include inherent emulsion instability, injection pain, a need for antimicrobial agents to prevent sepsis, and a concern of hyperlipidemia-related side effects. Efforts to overcome such drawbacks have involved the development of propofol emulsions with altered propofol and lipid contents, the addition of different excipients to emulsions for antimicrobial activity, and study of nonemulsion formulations including propofol-cyclodextrin and propofol-polymeric micelle formulations. In addition, a number of propofol prodrugs have been made and evaluated.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗
PubMed2006

Cerebral blood flow affects dose requirements of intracarotid propofol for electrocerebral silence.

BACKGROUND: The authors hypothesized that cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes will affect the dose of intracarotid propofol required to produce electrocerebral silence. METHODS: The authors tested their hypothesis on New Zealand White rabbits. The first group of 9 animals received intracarotid propofol during (1) normoventilation, (2) hyperventilation, and (3) hypoventilation. The second group of 14 animals received intracarotid propofol with or without concurrent intraarterial verapamil, a potent cerebral vasodilator. The third group of 8 animals received bolus injection of propofol during normotension, during severe cerebral hypoperfusion, and after hemodynamic recovery. RESULTS: In the first group, there was a linear correlation between the dose of intracarotid propofol and percent change (%Delta) in CBF from the baseline due to changes in the minute ventilation, Total Dose (y) = 0.17 + 0.012 * %Delta CBF (x), n = 27, r = 0.76. In the second group, the dose of propofol was also a function of CBF change after verapamil, Total Dose (y) = 0.98 + 0.1 * %Delta CBF (x), n = 14, r = 0.75. In the third group, the duration of electrocerebral silence after intracarotid propofol (3 mg) was significantly increased with concurrent cerebral hypoperfusion compared with prehypoperfusion and posthypoperfusion values (141 +/- 38 vs. 19 +/- 24 and 16 +/- 12 s, respectively, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that CBF affects the dose requirements of intracarotid propofol required to produce electrocerebral silence. Furthermore, the manipulation of CBF might be a useful tool to enhance the efficacy of intracarotid drugs.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2007

A randomized crossover comparison of the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on cerebral hemodynamics during carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous and inhalational anesthetic agents have differing effects on cerebral hemodynamics: Sevoflurane causes some vasodilation, whereas propofol does not. The authors hypothesized that these differences affect internal carotid artery pressure (ICAP) and the apparent zero flow pressure (critical closing pressure) during carotid endarterectomy. Vasodilation is expected to increase blood flow, reduce ICAP, and reduce apparent zero flow pressure. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, the gradient between systemic arterial pressure and ICAP during carotid clamping was measured while changing between sevoflurane and propofol in 32 patients. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity, recorded by transcranial Doppler, and ICAP waveforms were analyzed to determine the apparent zero flow pressure. RESULTS: ICAP increased when changing from sevoflurane to propofol, causing the mean gradient between arterial pressure and ICAP to decrease by 10 mmHg (95% confidence interval, 6-14 mmHg; P<0.0001). Changing from propofol to sevoflurane had the opposite effect: The pressure gradient increased by 5 mmHg (95% confidence interval, 2-7 mmHg; P=0.002). Ipsilateral middle cerebral artery blood velocity decreased when changing from sevoflurane to propofol. Cerebral steal was detected in one patient after changing from propofol to sevoflurane. The apparent zero flow pressure (mean+/-SD) was 22+/-10 mmHg with sevoflurane and 30+/-14 mmHg with propofol (P<0.01). There was incomplete drug crossover due to the limited duration of carotid clamping. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with sevoflurane, ipsilateral ICAP and apparent zero flow pressure are both higher with propofol. Vasodilatation associated with sevoflurane can cause cerebral steal.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The changes of propofol concentration in human cerebrospinal fluid after drug infusion.

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of the propofol concentration changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after the termination of the drug infusion. METHODS: Nine patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I-III) scheduled for elective intracranial procedures were studied. Propofol was applied in the form of target control infusion. During anesthesia, fractional doses of fentanyl and cisatracurium were administered as necessary. After tracheal intubation, the lungs were ventilated to achieve normocapnia with an oxygen-air mixture (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.33). Arterial blood and CSF samples (from an intraventricular drain) were taken simultaneously at the end of propofol infusion and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after the end of infusion. RESULTS: A pronounced decrease of the anesthetic concentration in plasma (P < 0.001) was observed during the first 15 minutes after infusion termination, followed by further yet slower decrease of the drug concentration. At the end of propofol infusion, the concentration of propofol in CSF was 65.59 ng/mL (SD, 26.91 ng/mL) and remained almost stable for approximately 30 minutes; afterward, a slow decrease of CSF propofol concentration was observed. CONCLUSION: The statement that CSF can be regarded as a significant route for drugs delivery to the brain is disputable for propofol. The obtained results show that, in contrast to the situation from induction of anesthesia, back transport of the drug from CSF to blood is markedly slower, supporting the thesis about propofol transport from blood to CSF by passive diffusion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Activation of interictal spiking in mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy by propofol-induced sleep.

The objective of this study was to test whether low-dose propofol increases the number of interictal spikes in patients with mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy, and to determine whether this is the result of intrinsic properties and is restricted to the primary epileptogenic focus. Controlled infusion of propofol in step-up/-down target concentrations of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 mg/L was administered to 10 patients during a 3.5-hour daytime EEG registration. The number of spikes were counted and related to propofol concentration and sleep level. Results were compared with a spontaneous, nocturnal first sleep cycle in 9 of 10 patients. All patients entered nonrapid eye movement 1 sleep during propofol administration, and 8 reached nonrapid eye movement 2 sleep. In 7 patients who showed spikes, spikes were related to sleep (P < 0.05) and not to increasing (P = 0.1) or decreasing (P = 0.5) propofol concentration. Six of nine patients showed more spikes during spontaneous (nocturnal) sleep than during propofol-induced sleep. Contralateral spiking was not suppressed selectively. Low-dose propofol is a safe means of increasing spiking in these patients because it induces sleep. There were no signs of an intrinsic epileptogenicity of propofol or a selective effect on ipsilateral spikes. Controlled sleep induction will increase the yield of interictal spikes during short interictal recordings such as in magnetoencephalography.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparative study of propofol and midazolam effects on somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical treatment of scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: Studies of the effects on lower-limb cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) during total intravenous anesthesia are sparse for propofol and are lacking for midazolam. This study was designed to compare the effects of propofol and midazolam on CSEP under total intravenous anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring for surgical treatment of scoliosis. METHODS: CSEPs were recorded in two groups of 15 patients during posterior instrumentation for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The anesthesia used the combination of atracurium, alfentanil, and an hypnotic agent (propofol for Group I or midazolam for Group II). The main characteristics of the CSEPs (P40 latency and N34-P40 and P40-N50 amplitudes) were recorded using ankle posterior tibial nerve stimulation. The CSEPs were recorded before induction, 10, 70, 100, 130, and 160 minutes after induction, and before the wake-up test. The statistical analysis involved analysis of variance for repeated measures. Both groups were homogeneous before induction. RESULTS: Neither CSEP deterioration during risk-associated surgical procedures nor postoperative clinical abnormalities were observed. Both propofol and midazolam induced increases in P40 latencies, with the increases being greater and more regular for the propofol-treated group. The amplitude values changed with time for both groups, decreasing mainly after induction; in the midazolam-treated group, the amplitudes were smaller but more stable. Propofol modified the morphological characteristics of the response by decreasing the late P60 component amplitude; the W-shaped CSEP morphological pattern was maintained with midazolam. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the appropriate use of either propofol or midazolam in scoliosis monitoring. Preoperative small-amplitude CSEPs might favor the use of propofol anesthesia.

Adolescent↗