Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “NOISE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources

Network-based de-noising improves prediction from microarray data.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of human cell response to anti-cancer drugs (compounds) from microarray data is a challenging problem, due to the noise properties of microarrays as well as the high variance of living cell responses to drugs. Hence there is a strong need for more practical and robust methods than standard methods for real-value prediction. RESULTS: We devised an extended version of the off-subspace noise-reduction (de-noising) method to incorporate heterogeneous network data such as sequence similarity or protein-protein interactions into a single framework. Using that method, we first de-noise the gene expression data for training and test data and also the drug-response data for training data. Then we predict the unknown responses of each drug from the de-noised input data. For ascertaining whether de-noising improves prediction or not, we carry out 12-fold cross-validation for assessment of the prediction performance. We use the Pearson's correlation coefficient between the true and predicted response values as the prediction performance. De-noising improves the prediction performance for 65% of drugs. Furthermore, we found that this noise reduction method is robust and effective even when a large amount of artificial noise is added to the input data. CONCLUSION: We found that our extended off-subspace noise-reduction method combining heterogeneous biological data is successful and quite useful to improve prediction of human cell cancer drug responses from microarray data.

Algorithms↗

Postreceptoral chromatic detection mechanisms revealed by noise masking in three-dimensional cone contrast space.

We used a noise masking technique to test the hypothesis that detection is subserved by only two chromatic postreceptoral mechanisms (red-green and blue-yellow) and one achromatic (luminance) mechanism. The task was to detect a 1-c/deg Gaussian enveloped grating presented in a mask of static, spatially low-passed binary or Gaussian distributed noise. In the main experiment, the direction of the test stimulus (termed the signal) was constant in cone contrast space, and the direction of the noise was sampled in equally spaced directions within a plane (the noise plane) in the space. The signal was chosen to coincide with one of the three cardinal directions of three postulated mechanisms. The noise plane was selected to span two of the cardinal directions, including that chosen as the signal direction. As the noise direction was sampled around the noise plane, the signal detection threshold was found to vary in accordance with a linear cosine model, which predicted noise directions yielding maximum and minimum masking of the signal. In the direction of minimum masking (termed a null direction), the noise was found to have no masking effect on the signal. Moreover, the null was not orthogonal to the signal direction but lay instead in one of the cardinal directions. Our findings suggest that detection is mediated by only three mechanisms. In a further experiment we found little or no cross masking between each pair of cardinal directions up to the limit of our noise mask contrasts. This further supports the presence of no more than three independent postreceptoral mechanisms.

Artifacts↗

Noise Mapping and Annoyance.

The EC has published a Green Paper on noise policy in the EU and has issued a directive on the assessment and reduction of environmental noise. This directive will make noise mapping mandatory for cities with at least 250.000 inhabitants. Due to the development in computer technology it is possible to calculate noise maps for large urban areas using the available data on buildings, ground profile, road and rail traffic. Examples for noise mapping are Birmingham (GB), Linz (A) and various German cities. Based on noise maps and empirical data on the correlation between annoyance and noise levels annoyance maps for different sources (rail, road, aircraft) can be calculated. Under the assumption that the annoyance for the different sources are only weakly correlated, a combined annoyance map can be calculated. In a second step using the distribution of the population the actual number of annoyed people can be evaluated. This analysis can be used, for example, to identify noise hot spots and to assess the impact of major traffic projects - roads, airports- on the noise situation as well as the impact on the population. Furthermore, the combined annoyance maps can be used to investigate on health effects and to check whether or not empirical correlations between annoyance and noise levels are sufficiently correct.

Journal Article↗

Night-time Noise Annoyance: State of the Art.

The annoyance-reaction is one of the central variables in noise research. After an introduction to different concepts and definitions of noise annoyance different scales of how noise annoyance can be measured are shown. The question is discussed whether disturbance effects of noise at different times of day are given. To clarify this problem, the results of a series of actual German noise studies are reported. In these studies differences between day- and night-time annoyance are found depending on the sound sources. For the case of road traffic noise no differences between day and night-time annoyance were found. In contrast, annoyance reactions are related to the time of day for railway and air traffic noise. Especially for aircraft noise, above a Leq of 50 dB(A) night-time annoyance rises faster than day-time annoyance. The effects are discussed in the frame of a cognitive model of noise annoyance. It is argued that annoyance judgements are based on an internal representation of the noise situation. Part of this representation are the event characteristics of the sound sources and their estimated impacts for disturbances at different times of day.

Journal Article↗

The World Health Organisation and the prevention of deafness and hearing impairment caused by noise.

The WHO Programme for Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment (PDH) is especially targeted at developing countries where there is a serious lack of accurate population-based data on the prevalence and causes of deafness and hearing impairment, including noise-induced hearing loss. However, opportunities exist for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss by primary, secondary and tertiary means and it is necessary for countries to measure the size of the problem and adopt strategies for its prevention. The World Health Assembly has passed two resolutions in relation to PDH, in 1985 and 1995. They affirmed that much deafness and hearing impairment is avoidable or remediable and that the greatest needs for the problem are in developing countries. The 1995 resolution estimated that there are 120 million persons with disabling hearing difficulties worldwide and urged member states to set up National Programmes for the prevention of deafness and hearing impairment, with the technical assistance of WHO. WHO-PDH addresses problems in this field of major public health importance which are amenable to intervention, giving priority to the poorest developing countries. These problems include ototoxicity, chronic otitis media, noise damage to hearing, inherited and congenital causes, and the provision of appropriate affordable hearing aid services. A fundamental requirement for the development of a National Plan and choice of preventive strategy for a National Programme is accurate, population-based data on the prevalence and causes of the problem. The PDH programme has developed a standardised Ear Disease Assessment Protocol to enable countries to conduct national surveys rapidly. A National Programme will require a set of integrated strategies to prevent deafness and hearing impairment. The PDH programme has already addressed two such causes, ototoxic drugs and chronic otitis media and will shortly produce guidelines for implementation of these strategies within the context of primary health care. The most recent meeting organised by the PDH programme at WHO, in the series on strategies for prevention, was on the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss, held in Geneva in October 1997. The participants concluded that exposure to excessive noise is the major avoidable cause of permanent hearing impairment worldwide. Noise-induced hearing loss is the most prevalent irreversible industrial disease, and the biggest compensatable occupational hazard. In developing countries, occupational noise and urban, environmental noise are increasing risk factors for hearing impairment. The meeting recommended that all countries should implement National Programmes for the Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss, integrated with Primary Health Care, and including elements on health promotion, and measures to reduce noise sources and introduce legislation and effective hearing conservation. There is an urgent need to obtain more, accurate epidemiological data on the problem, especially in developing countries. More research is needed on basic mechanisms and means of prevention.

Journal Article↗

Effect of noise on the vestibular system - Vestibular evoked potential studies in rats.

Studies have shown that in order for sound to affect the vestibular end organs in the inner ear, very high intensities are required. Furthermore, in patients with noise induced hearing loss, vestibular signs, if present, are subclinical. In order to study possible auditory-vestibular interactions in a more controlled fashion, using physiological sound intensities, the present study used short latency vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) to impulses of angular (15,000 degrees /sec(2), risetime 1.5 msec) and linear (3-5 g, risetime 1.5 msec) acceleration were used to study the possible effects of sound on peripheral vestibular function in rats. Four different paradigms were used: a - an intense (135 dB pe SPL) click stimulus was presented 5 msec before the linear acceleration impulse and the VsEP to 128 stimuli were recorded with and without this click stimulus. There was no effect of the preceding intense click on the first wave (reflecting end organ activity) of the linear VsEP. b - 113 dB SPL white noise "masking" was presented while the VsEPs were elicited. A 10-20% reduction in the amplitude of the first VsEP wave was seen during the noise exposure, but 5 minutes after this exposure, there was almost complete recovery to pre-exposure amplitude. c - 113 dB SPL noise was presented for one hour and VsEPs were recorded within 15 minutes of cessation of the noise. The auditory nerve-brainstem-evoked response showed a temporary threshold shift while there was no effect on the VsEP. d - 113 dB SPL white noise was presented for 12 hours per day for 21 consecutive days. Auditory nerve-brainstem-evoked responses and vestibular (VsEPs) function were studied one week after the conclusion of the noise exposure. Auditory function was severely permanently depressed (40 dB threshold elevation and clear histological damage) while the amplitude of wave 1 of the VsEP was not affected. It seems therefore that even though intense noise clearly affects the cochlea and may have a "masking" effect on the vestibular end organs, the intensities used in this study (113 dB SPL) are not able to produce a long-term noise induced vestibular disorder in the initially normal ear. These differences between the response of the cochlear and vestibular end organs to noise may be due to dissimilarities in their acoustic impedances and/or their electrical resting potential.

Journal Article↗

Binaural masking effects in bone-conducted noise.

When pure tones are masked by bone-conducted noise presented at the midline of the forehead, it is possible that binaural unmasking may occur due to the interaural phase relations of the noise. To study this possibility, the amount of masking produced in bone-conducted noise, in correlated air-conducted noise, and in monaural noise was determined using narrow bands of noise centered at 240, 500, 910, and 1900 Hz as markers and a block up-down two-interval forced choice procedure. The subjects were four women under 30 years of age with 10 dB HTL or better (ANSI, 1969) for the frequencies tested. The amount of unmasking (the masking-level difference) was determined by subtracting the masking levels obtained under each noise condition at each frequency from those obtained in the comparable monaural noise-monaural signal condition. Levels of binaural unmasking obtained in correlated air-conducted noise agreed with those in previously reported experiments. Comparable binaural unmasking effects were demonstrated for midline presentation of bone-conducted noise. Some clinical implications of the findings are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare noise exposure measurements based on the recently revised noise exposure criteria recommended by the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the current U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hearing Conservation Amendment to the occupational noise standard. METHODS: Daily 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) personal noise exposures were obtained for 61 workers using dosimeters set simultaneously to the NIOSH and OSHA Hearing Conservation Amendment (OSHA-HCA) criteria. A variety of work groups with the potential for noise exposure were evaluated as a part of this investigation. RESULTS: Noise dose based on the NIOSH criteria was higher than the corresponding OSHA-HCA noise dose with differences in noise exposures measured under the two criteria equal to 6.6 dBA. Should the new NIOSH recommendation on noise measurement be adopted as standard, the number of workers to be enrolled in a hearing loss prevention program was estimated to increase by 2. 7-fold from 23% to 75% of the study population. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that if the NIOSH criteria are to be adopted as an OSHA standard, there is likely to be a substantial increase in the number of workers in hearing conservation programs.

Acoustics↗

Environmental noise and human prenatal growth.

To determine whether chronic exposure to relatively loud noise has demonstrable biological effects in humans, a study was conducted on the effect of mother's exposure to airport noise while pregnant, and of social and biological characteristics of the family upon birthweight and gestation length. The sample of births was drawn from a community located adjacent to an international airport in the U.S., where noise levels had been measured previously. Mother's noise exposure was based upon noise levels near her residence in the community while she was pregnant. Data from 115 births were used, these being from mothers whose noise exposure history was most complete throughout the pregnancy. Using multivariate analysis to correct for family characteristics, the partial correlation coefficient for noise exposure and gestation length was negative, large, and significant in girls (r = -0.49, p less than 0.001). In boys the partial correlation coefficient was also negative but was smaller and did not quite reach statistical significance. Partial correlations with birthweight were smaller in both boys and girls and not significant. These results agree best with previous studies that suggest that noise may reduce prenatal growth. The size of the observed effects may be related to a conservative research design biased towards underestimation, as well as to the real effects of noise upon human prenatal growth.

Aircraft↗

[Various characteristics of industrial noise].

In this paper, broad characteristics of industrial noise are recalled briefly. High levels and multiple sources require special rules for the measurement or risk, such as the location of microphones at the height of the worker's ear. Industrial noise is either continuous-, and in such case one measurement is enough to evaluate the amount of risk for the inner ear-or fluctuates with time. This is the reason why noise level meters which integrate noise levels along time, must be used in many industrial situations and risk expressed in equivalent level. The unit for industrial noise is the dB(A) which is now universally admitted as reflecting satisfactorily the differential sensitivity of the ear. Lastly, the worker's exposure is also determined by the size (among other factors) of the workshop in which the noise source is located. Authors recommend that noise measurement in industry should not be limited to hygienic purposes and protection against industrial deafness but extended to other requirements of workers. In this respect, physical noise level measurement should be considered as one part of a noise abatement program and be completed by a survey on workers feeling of disturbance and uneasiness.

Communication↗

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor has a dose dependent influence on noise-induced hearing loss in the guinea pig cochlea.

We examined the effectiveness of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) to attenuate cochlear damage from intense noise stress. Subjects were exposed to 115 dB SPL one octave band noise centered at 4 kHz for 5 h. They received artificial perilymph with or without GDNF into the left scala tympani at 0.5 microliter/h from 4 days before noise exposure through 8 days following noise exposure. Different concentrations of GDNF (1 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 1 microgram/ml) were applied chronically directly into the guinea pig cochlea via a microcannula and osmotic pump. Noise-induced hearing loss was assessed with pure tone auditory brainstem responses (at 2, 4, 8 and 20 kHz), measured prior to surgery, 1 day before noise exposure, and 7 days following noise exposure. Subjects were killed on day 8 following exposure for histological preparation and quantitative assessment of hair cell (HC) damage. A dose-dependent protective effect of GDNF on both sensory cell preservation and hearing function was found in the treated ears. At 1 ng/ml, GDNF showed no significant protection; at 10 ng/ml, GDNF showed significant HC protection; and at 100ng/ml, it was greater and bilateral. At 1 microgram/ml, GDNF appeared to have a toxic effect under noise stress in some cochleae. These findings indicate that GDNF at certain concentrations can effectively protect the inner ear from noise-induced hearing loss.

Animals↗

Noise induces A1 adenosine receptor expression in the chinchilla cochlea.

Adenosine plays a major cytoprotective role during ischemia and conditions of oxidative stress. Previous studies in our laboratory indicate that oxidative stress induces expression of the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) via activation of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB. In this study, we tested whether noise exposure could induce oxidative stress and determine whether this induces expression of the A1AR in the chinchilla cochlea. Chinchillas were exposed to a 96 dB 4 kHz octave band of noise for 6 h of daily exposure, followed by an 18 h noise-free period. This noise paradigm resulted in threshold shifts of 10-60 dB over the frequency range (1-16 kHz) tested. Radioligand binding studies for the A1AR indicate a significant increase in receptor ( approximately 2-fold) expression soon after the first noise exposure period (usually within approximately 8 h of the initiation of noise), which gradually returned to basal levels by day 7. The rise in A1AR levels was followed by a significant increase in malondialdehyde levels by day 3, which also recovered by day 7. Assessment of the activity of NADPH oxidase in the cochlea indicates a significant increase in enzyme activity which was evident by approximately 8 h following initiation of noise exposure, and which persisted for at least up to day 3. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicate that the increase in A1AR was associated with a significant increase in NF-kappaB activity following noise exposure. We conclude that noise exposure induces A1AR expression, which might be mediated, in part, through generation of reactive oxygen species and activation of NF-kappaB.

Adenosine↗

Conditioning the auditory system with continuous vs. interrupted noise of equal acoustic energy: is either exposure more protective?

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences exist in the amount of protection provided by prior sound conditioning with continuous vs. interrupted, moderate-level noise. Differences were determined by monitoring the changes that occurred in cubic (2f1-f2) distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitude growth functions subsequent to a traumatizing noise exposure (105 dB SPL, 1.0-2.0 kHz octave band noise presented 24 h per day for 3 days) in guinea pigs which had been conditioned with either continuous (89 dB SPL, 1.0-2.0 kHz octave band noise presented 24 h per day for 11 days) or interrupted noise (95 dB SPL, 1.0-2.0 kHz octave band noise presented on a 6-h 'on'/18-h 'off' schedule for 11 days) of equal acoustic energy. Results suggest that there are significant differences in the degree of protection provided by prior sound conditioning with the continuous and interrupted schedules of moderate-level noise used in this study. Specifically, the interrupted conditioning protocol afforded some degree of protection against the damaging effects of the traumatizing noise exposure, limited to frequencies above the noise exposure band. Conversely, there was a lack of any consistent and sizable protective effect found across the entire test frequency range for the continuous sound conditioning protocol.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

[Progressive noise induced hearing loss caused by hearing AIDS, a dilemma for the worker and the expert alike].

BACKGROUND: Investigating cases of noise induced hearing loss the expert is often confronted with the situation that the hearing loss is progressive although the noise exposure has been reduced to almost non-damaging levels. Other causes such as age, hereditary deafness, head injuries, blasts, internal diseases can be excluded. Hearing aids as sources of damaging noise? By consulting the protocol of the hearing-aid acoustician and by own examinations the expert should obtain the following data: loudness level that yields best discrimination score of speech; level of discomfort for tones and speech, discrimination score that is achieved under free field condition with a speech level of 65 dB, using the hearing aids. Furthermore he should explore the circumstances under which the hearing aids are used: how many hours per day, at what occasions etc.? INTERPRETATION: It is likely that in using the hearing aids they are adjusted to emit an intensity level identical to the one yielding the optimal discrimination score. If this e. g. is 100 dB and the hearing aids are used for 2 hours per day this would be equivalent to an exposure to industrial noise of 94 dB (A) for 8 hours daily without ear protection. DISCUSSION: Among all individuals working under industrial noise exposure today only about 1 - 2 % having unusually vulnerable inner ears will suffer a noise induced hearing loss. On the other hand workers in industrial noise are accustomed to loud noise levels, usually have a raised threshold of discomfort and therefore are likely to adjust their hearing aids to such high intensities. The expert will have to decide whether in an individual case the industrial noise exposure or the use of the hearing aids is the dominant risk for further damage. The consequences in respect to the regulations of the workers' health insurance are discussed.

Auditory Threshold↗

[Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging].

BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can detect changes in oxygen saturation of the brain. Fast changing high gradient fields are necessary which produce high levels of noise. In studies of the auditory cortex, auditory stimuli have to be perceived and discriminated against the noise level of the activated tomograph. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The generated frequency bands and their intensities during fMRI with a Siemens Magnetom Vision, 1.5 T, EPI sequence were measured in the outer ear canal of a dummy head. Noise attenuation was evaluated with four different noise muffs (simple/inexpensive products, quality product, specialized fMRI muffs). RESULTS: Without protection, peak noise levels reached up to 111 dB(A) near 1000 Hz in the dummy ear canal. Major noise attenuation was only found at higher frequencies (4000 Hz by about 25 dB; 8000 Hz by about 35 dB) with the quality product and the specialized fMRI muffs. CONCLUSION: Only quality noise products can sufficiently protect patients from high sound pressure levels of tomograph noise. If in the future higher gradient fields are applied at faster slew rates, acoustic stimuli can safely be applied only in combination with increased hearing protection systems in order to minimize the risk of noise trauma.

Ear Protective Devices↗

Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effect of earmuffs.

Noise measurements were taken inside and outside earmuffs worn by 238 workers at 21 industrial plants in order to evaluate exposure to noise and to measure the attenuation by earmuffs used at workplaces. The means of the equivalent noise levels were 93 dB outside the earmuffs and 76 dB inside them. The mean earmuff attenuation was 17 dB. The standard deviations of each of these three values was 6 dB. Thus 90% of the employees wearing earmuffs experienced equivalent noise levels of lower than 85 dB(A) inside the earmuffs. In addition to equivalent noise level, the impulsiveness of the noise was determined based on the cumulative distribution of the crest factor of the signal. The impulse percentage F15 denotes the percentage of the total measurement time when the peak level exceeds the rms level by at least 15 dB. The mean impulse percentage F15 was 1.6% outside earmuffs and 0.8% inside earmuffs. The results showed that earmuffs also attenuated the impulsiveness of noise. The shipyard noise had the highest impulse percentage; the noise in printing plants and papermills had the lowest impulse percentage.

Acoustics↗

Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss in fire fighters assigned to airport fire stations.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was requested to conduct a health hazard evaluation (HHE) at a large metropolitan fire department. The request concerned the hearing levels and noise exposures of fire fighters who were assigned to two fire stations serving the international airport. There was concern that these fire fighters were at a greater risk of accruing hearing loss than fire fighters located at other fire stations because of the addition of aircraft noise to their occupational noise exposures. The city also requested that NIOSH investigate other fire stations, not influenced by the airport, for noise exposures and hearing ability among a larger population of the fire fighters. NIOSH investigators conducted noise surveys at five fire stations and examined the hearing ability of 197 fire fighters. The noise surveys consisted of personal noise dosimetry on fire fighters assigned to the fire station for the entire 24-hr tour of duty over 2 consecutive days at each of the five stations. A NIOSH investigator accompanied the fire fighters on their vehicle to log response times and activities. The audiometric examinations were pure-tone, air conduction tests administered according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) hearing conservation amendment. The noise dosimetry results revealed time-weighted averages (TWAs) that ranged from 60 to 82 dBA. However, the levels encountered during Code 3 responses (warning lights, sirens, and air horns) reached 109 dBA for a 1-min time period. The audiometric results showed that the average fire fighter exhibited a characteristic noise-induced permanent threshold shift.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Impulse noise: critical review.

A review of the last 10 years of research on impulse noise reveals certain insights and perspectives on the biological and audiological effects of exposures to impulse noise. First, impulse noise may damage the cochlea by direct mechanical processes. Second, after exposure to impulse noise, hearing may recover in an erratic, nonmonotonic pattern. Third, even though the existing damage-risk criteria evaluate impulse noise in terms of level, duration, and number, often parameters such as temporal pattern, waveform, and rise time are also important in the production of a hearing loss. Fourth, the effects of impulse noise are often inconsistent with the principle of the equal energy hypothesis. Fifth, impulse noise can interact with background continuous noise to produce greater hearing loss than would have been predicted by the simple sum of the individual noises.

Animals↗