Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Legal Approach”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

At law. Experts.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethicists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Border patrol.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Industry↗
PubMed2003

Patients rights and accountability: can there exist rights without remedies in an American legal and legislative framework?

Considerable attention has been given patient rights within the borders of the United States over the last five to 10 years. This has been driven by the creation of the managed health care organization. But as this form of health care delivery within the United States has a strong foothold, perils in its administration have arisen, notably how America's legislative and civil justice systems need to respond to the issue of accountability for such entities when they make decisions as to what care and treatment should be provided to enrollees of their plans. This has come to be known as decisions involving what is medically necessary care and treatment. The American Congress has tackled, legislatively, the issue of patient rights (and remedies within these rights) to be accorded patients affected by decisions made by managed care organizations. Unfortunately, these efforts have stalled, principally over the remedies to be so afforded patients whose care has been unacceptable, i.e., fallen below a standard of care that results in injury or death. Experience from other nations has not been helpful due, in large measure, to the system of health care delivery within those countries. America's civil court decisions, however, are not only illuminating a proper path to follow nonetheless, but also are a beacon to follow for justice systems in other countries faced with the same or similar issues.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2003

Importing and exporting gametes and embryos under the Infertility Treatment Act 1995 (Vic): an unconstitutional restraint on free trade?

Since the introduction of the Infertility Treatment Act 1995 (Vic), it has been illegal to import into or export from Victoria a gamete or embryo outside the human body without the approval of the Infertility Treatment Authority. But is s 56 unconstitutional and therefore invalid by reason of contravening the freedom of interstate trade guarantee by s 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution? By exploring the nature and effect of s 56 this article demonstrates that s 56 may impose a "discriminatory" and "protectionist" burden that renders s 56 invalid.

Commerce↗
PubMed2000

Jodie and Mary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Child↗