Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Digoxin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources

Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and rate control by digoxin in comparison to placebo.

AIMS: A randomized, double-blind study with a high dose of digoxin administered intravenously for conversion of atrial fibrillation (not due to haemodynamic alternations) to sinus rhythm, and for rate control in converters and non-converters was set up. Outcome measures were conversion within 12 h; time to conversion; early rate control; and stable slowing within 12 h. METHODS: We studied 40 patients with recent onset (< 1 week) atrial fibrillation; controls received saline intravenously, the other patients digoxin 1.25 mg. RESULTS: One patient converted before digoxin administration. Conversion occurred in 9/19 patients on digoxin and in 8/20 on placebo (ns). The mean time to conversion tended to be shorter only for digoxin. Two late conversions on placebo were observed within 24 h. Heart rate during atrial fibrillation decreased after 30 min for converters and non-converters (P < 0.05). For all patients on digoxin, heart rate after 30 min was lower compared to baseline (P < 0.002) and to placebo (P < 0.02). Persistent, stable slowing occurred only in 3/10 non-converters on digoxin (P < 0.05), and two patients developed bradyarrhythmias. QTc was shortened immediately after conversion in all patients. Converters had baseline characteristics similar to those of non-converters. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous digoxin offers no substantial advantages over placebo in recent onset atrial fibrillation with respect to conversion, and provides weak rate control.

Aged↗

Digoxin-like substance(s) interfere(s) with serum estimations of the drug in cirrhotic patients.

We measured the levels of digoxin-like immunoreactivity in the serum of 40 volunteers (20 patients with liver cirrhosis and 20 healthy adults) before and after the administration of a 5-day standard regimen of digoxin. Serum digoxin levels (SDL) were evaluated with two different radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits--Amerlex Digoxin 125I RIA and Digoxin 125I RIA. Digoxin was detectable by each RIA kit in 10 and 15% of controls and 50 and 60% of cirrhotic patients before the administration of the drug, respectively. At the end of the treatment with digoxin, SDL were significantly higher in cirrhotics when compared with those of controls. This study provides evidence that digoxin-like substance(s) is (are) implicated in the detection of high SDL in patients with histologically confirmed liver cirrhosis.

Blood Proteins↗

Effects of adrenaline and mental stress on serum digoxin concentration.

Physical activity and pharmacological stimulation of beta 2-adrenoceptors by salbutamol increase skeletal muscle digoxin binding with a secondary decrease in serum digoxin, possibly due to increased Na-K-ATPase activity. The present study was undertaken to examine if adrenaline (ADR) infusion and sympathoadrenal stimulation by mental stress affect the serum concentrations of digoxin and potassium. After 10 days on 0.50 mg digoxin orally, 35 healthy volunteers were investigated following 2 h of supine rest. They were divided into four groups: intravenous saline (placebo, n = 10). ADR infusion at the rates of 0.1 nmol kg-1 min-1 (ADR-L, n = 8), 0.4 nmol kg-1 min-1 (ADR-H, n = 7), or subjected to a mental stress [a color-word conflict test (CWT), n = 10]. Arterial blood samples were taken before and during the active period (50 min) and during the following 60 min (at rest) to analyze serum digoxin and potassium and plasma ADR and noradrenaline (NA). All variables were stable during placebo infusion. ADR infusions caused significant and dose-dependent decreases in serum digoxin (p less than 0.05 during ADR-L and p less than 0.001 during ADR-H) and serum potassium (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.001, respectively). CWT, on the other hand, did not reduce serum digoxin and caused a slight decrease in serum potassium only in the poststress period. Thus, ADR caused dose-dependent shifts of digoxin and potassium, whereas mental stress failed to do so, possibly due to a modest ADR response and small increases in sympathetic nerve activity in skeletal muscle.

Administration, Oral↗

Red blood cell electrolytes for monitoring digoxin therapy in adults.

Red blood cell (RBC) electrolyte concentrations were determined, with a method that can be applied easily in any clinical chemistry laboratory, in 18 patients not on digoxin therapy and 37 patients on maintenance digoxin therapy for various diagnoses. Of the digoxin-treated patients, 11 had electrocardiographic changes and other clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity. Mean RBC sodium was higher and mean RBC potassium was lower in patients on prolonged digoxin therapy than in controls, and these changes were more pronounced in patients with toxic symptoms. In the group of 11 patients with toxicity, a positive correlation was found between the ratio of RBC sodium to potassium and plasma digoxin levels (r = 0.8234, p less than 0.05). Plasma digoxin concentrations did not clearly distinguish between toxic and nontoxic patients. The RBC sodium/potassium ratio, however, identified 35 of 37 patients correctly, with two patients from the toxic and two patients from the nontoxic group giving the same results. Changes in intracellular erythrocyte electrolytes in adults appear to correlate closely with clinical signs of digoxin toxicity.

Adult↗

Analytical performance of a monoclonal digoxin assay with increased specificity on the ACS:180.

Digoxin metabolites cross-react in the Ciba Corning ACS digoxin assay in proportion to their bioactivity, but have greater (near 100%) cross-reactivity in the Abbott TDx, Baxter Stratus, and Ciba Corning Magic RIA digoxin assays. We studied the analytical performance of the ACS digoxin assay and compared it with these other assays. Coefficients of variation ranged from 5.5% at 3.11 ng/ml to 8.8% at 0.57 ng/ml. Mean analytical recovery was 96.4%. Results on dilutions were linear in the range of 0.6-5.0 ng/ml. We observed no interference by hemoglobin, bilirubin, or triglycerides. Dihydrodigoxin and digitoxin had lower cross-reactivity in the ACS and Stratus assays than in the TDx and Magic assays. Digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) in patients' sera was not detected in the ACS assay but was in the TDx, Stratus, and Magic assays. Digibind therapy seemingly did not affect digoxin results by ACS or Stratus, but did for up to 10 days after therapy for TDx and Magic. We compared digoxin results for 121 sera from 49 patients. Deming regression analysis was performed on the first specimen from each patient: ACS = 1.08(TDx)-0.17 ng/ml (r = 0.961, Sy,x = 0.164); ACS = 1.16(Stratus)-0.46 ng/ml (r = 0.973, Sy,x = 0.123); ACS = 1.00(Magic)-0.20 ng/ml (r = 0.982, Sy,x = 0.110). Discrepant results (> 2Sy,x from the regression line) were usually lower by the ACS assay (87%). Nine of 11 patients with discrepant results had renal insufficiency or hepatic disease, conditions commonly associated with increased DLIF. These observations may be explained by the improved specificity of the ACS digoxin assay.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Improved sensitivity of digoxin assay by modification of the EMIT 2000 method.

A modified EMIT 2000 digoxin assay was developed on the Cobas Mira plus analyzer for the determination of very low plasma concentrations of the drug. The major modifications were a higher plasma volume withdrawn during the analysis step and calibration curves constructed in the range 0-2 ng/ml using calibrators made up with biological matrix. Assays were controlled with an internal, four-level quality control (targets: 0.15; 0.60; 1.70; 2.70 ng/mL). The within-day and day-to-day mean observed values +/- SD (n = 10) of these quality controls were 0.14 +/- 0.02 and 0.15 +/- 0.02 ng/mL; 0.57 +/- 0.01 and 0.64 +/- 0.03 ng/mL; 1.55 +/- 0.06 and 1.62 +/- 0.04 ng/mL, 2.82 +/- 0.09 and 2.82 +/- 0.12 ng/mL, respectively. The detection and the quantification limits were 0.02 and 0.08 ng/mL, respectively. No significant difference was observed between digoxin plasma concentrations measured by the original and the modified EMIT 2000 digoxin assay in 25 plasma specimens, ranging from 0.4 to 3.0 ng/mL, from patients receiving the drug. This modified digoxin EMIT 2000 assay was subsequently used to study digoxin pharmacokinetics after each of 18 healthy volunteers was administered a single 0.5 mg oral dose. The pharmacokinetic parameters found in this study were in accordance with the literature in healthy subjects, using radioimmunoassay (RIA) for digoxin plasma concentration determinations. In conclusion, the lower limit of quantification of this modified EMIT 2000 digoxin assay is similar to that of RIA and can serve as a valuable screen for digoxin pharmacokinetic interactions studies.

Cardiotonic Agents↗

Digoxin, flecainide, and amiodarone transfer across the placenta and the effects of an elevated umbilical venous pressure on the transfer rate.

Clinical observations suggest that flecainide might pass the placenta more easily than digoxin, and that its transfer is less disturbed in case of hydrops fetalis than that of digoxin. The purpose of the study was to compare the materno-fetal transplacental transfer of digoxin, flecainide, and amiodarone, another antiarrhythmic agent used in the treatment of fetal tachyarrhythmia, and to assess the effect of an elevated umbilical venous pressure (UVP) on the transfer rate. Isolated lobules of 16 human placentas were dually perfused after spontaneous delivery or caesarean section. The transplacental transfer (area under the curve in the maternal compartment [maternal AUC], area under the curve in the fetal compartment [fetal AUC], kinetic parameters) of digoxin, flecainide, and amiodarone was calculated after these drugs were added to the maternal circuit. In five experiments, the effect of increased UVP on the transplacental transfer rate was assessed by elevating the UVP by 10 cm H2O. Flecainide efflux out of the maternal compartment was significantly greater than that of digoxin (maternal AUC 57.4% +/- 5.1 %/min vs 73.9% +/- 1.5%/min), whereas the flecainide influx into the fetal circulation was smaller (fetal AUC 9.3% +/- 4.1%/min vs 11.5% +/- 2.0%/min). Only in 50% of the experiments were the smallest amounts of amiodarone detectable in the fetal compartment. An elevation of the UVP reduced the influx of digoxin and flecainide into the fetal compartment (fetal AUC) from 11.5% +/- 2.0%/min to 7.4% +/- 1.9%/min and from 9.3% +/- 4.1% to 4.7% +/- 1.4%/min, respectively. Materno-fetal transplacental transfer of digoxin, flecainide, and amiodarone decreases in this sequence. Fetal cardiac insufficiency accompanied by an elevation of the UVP might reduce the transplacental transfer of these drugs, although no significant difference could be found between the reduction of transfer of digoxin and flecainide.

Amiodarone↗

The significance of the enterohepatic circulation on the metabolism of digoxin in patients with the ability of intestinal conversion of the drug.

A cardiac patient had to be given a very high dosage of digoxin to attain therapeutic plasma level. The increased dosage requirement could partly be explained by reduced bioavailability due to intestinal conversion of digoxin. Consequently, the kinetics of the drug was examined before and after erythromycin treatment. Before treatment the determination of the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) following a single dose of digoxin given orally or intravenously demonstrated a substantial reduction in the absolute bioavailability. Erythromycin administration during 20 days caused a dramatic rise in AUC when the single oral dose was repeated, exceeding the two AUC obtained prior to initiation of the antibiotic therapy, and the steady state plasma digoxin level was 2-3-fold increased. The fact that the AUC obtained for a single oral dose of digoxin after erythromycin treatment exceeded that obtained when given intravenously before erythromycin indicated the presence of an enterohepatic circulation of digoxin. This may contribute substantially to the elimination of digoxin in patients with the capability of intestinal conversion of digoxin.

Digoxin↗

No effect of probenecid on the renal and biliary clearances of digoxin in man.

1. The cardiac glycoside digoxin is subject to a number of pharmacokinetic interactions. This study concerns the influence of the anionic transport inhibitor probenecid on the steady-state kinetics of digoxin. 2. Six healthy young men were enrolled in the study. After an administration period of 6 days with digoxin only (0.5 to 1 mg p.o. day-1) or digoxin in combination with probenecid (2 g p.o. day-1; 8 days), digoxin was administered intravenously (0.7 oral dose) on day 7. Plasma and urine samples were taken over 48 h. The biliary clearance of digoxin was measured during day 8 by a duodenal perfusion technique. 3. Probenecid did not affect the plasma clearance (mean +/- s.d.: 255 +/- 80 vs 266 +/- 40 ml min-1), renal clearance (166 +/- 17 vs 155 +/- 10 ml min-1), biliary clearance (106 +/- 40 vs 111 +/- 50 ml min-1), elimination half-life (34.4 vs 35.2 h) or volume of distribution (538 +/- 241 vs 566 +/- 60 l) of digoxin. 4. Our results suggest that different systems exist in man for the renal and biliary secretion of probenecid and digoxin.

Administration, Oral↗

The bioavailability of digoxin from three oral formulations measured by a specific h.p.l.c. assay.

1. We have studied the absolute bioavailability of three oral formulations of digoxin, 1.0 mg, in 12 young healthy volunteers in a four way randomised cross-over study using an intravenous control. 2. Digoxin tablets (250 micrograms), liquid filled digoxin capsules (100 micrograms) and an experimental enteric-coated capsule (100 micrograms) were evaluated. In vitro dissolution at pH 1 demonstrated extensive hydrolytic breakdown of digoxin from the tablets and capsules but not from the enteric-coated capsules. 3. Serum 'digoxin' concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPI). The systemic availability (+/- s.d.) of the capsules was 70.5 +/- 11.3%, and that of the tablets 71.5 +/- 8.6%. Drug was less available from the enteric-coated capsules (62.1 +/- 10.3%) measured with FPI. These results were reflected in the urinary drug recoveries measured by FPI. 4. By contrast, there were no differences in urinary recovery of unchanged digoxin between any of the oral treatments, when this was measured by h.p.l.c. The cross-reactivity of immunoassays for metabolites of digoxin may produce artefactual results and the optimal pharmaceutical formulation for digoxin remains to be determined.

Administration, Oral↗

Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of digoxin in healthy volunteers.

1. Losartan (DuP 753, MK-954) is a novel, potent and highly selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The effect of multiple oral doses of losartan on digoxin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in healthy male subjects. 2. In a double-blind and randomized fashion, subjects received 50 mg losartan or placebo once daily for 15 days in each period. At least 7 days elapsed between the two treatment periods. On days 4 and 11 of each period, subjects also received a single 0.5 mg dose of digoxin intravenously and orally respectively. 3. Eleven of 13 subjects completed the study. Side effects were mild and transient (12 out of 13 subjects reported at least one adverse experience). During the study, no laboratory abnormalities were noted. 4. Multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of 0.5 mg of digoxin i.v. AUC(0.48h) of immunoreactive digoxin during losartan 28.8 +/- 2.9 vs 28.5 +/- 3.9 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 54.0 +/- 7.2 vs 51.9 +/- 6.5% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) and 1.09 (0.98, 1.21). 5. Multiple oral doses of losartan did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral digoxin AUC(0.48 h) during losartan 23.6 +/- 3.7 ng ml-1 h vs 22.4 +/- 2.6 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, Cmax 3.5 +/- 0.7 ng ml-1 with vs 3.1 +/- 0.5 ng ml-1 without losartan; not significant and tmax 0.6 +/- 0.2 h with vs 0.9 +/- 0.7 h without losartan; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 51.2 +/- 6.3 vs 46.3 +/- 2.4% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) and 1.12 (0.97, 1.28). 6. We conclude that multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) do not alter the pharmacokinetics of immunoreactive digoxin, following either intravenous or oral digoxin. Furthermore, the co-administration of digoxin with losartan is well tolerated by healthy male volunteers.

Administration, Oral↗

Correlation between predicted and measured digoxin serum concentrations.

Measurement of digoxin serum concentration can be useful as a direct guide to the dose appropriate to individual patients. Therefore, we have attempted to predict digoxin serum concentration in 62 patients with a wide range of body weight, age and renal function, using creatinine clearance and individual digoxin dose. Creatinine clearance in each patient was determined by the Cockroft and Gault method (1). Digoxin clearance was determined by Scheiner's method (2). Once digoxin clearance was determined, the predicted steady-state serum concentration was calculated using general pharmacokinetic principles. Each patient was on digoxin therapy for at least 1 month. Digoxin serum concentration was measured by the newly developed fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). A linear regression analysis was performed on the data from the predicted and measured serum level which yielded a slope of 0.9463, intercept of 0.0950 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9600. The method was found to be very useful to predict digoxin serum levels in overdosed and underdosed patients.

Adult↗

A pharmacokinetic study of digoxin in the horse.

Digoxin was administered orally and intravenously to seven healthy adult mares and geldings in two separate trials. At a dose of 44 microgram digoxin/kg body weight, the oral study was characterized by an absorption phase with a mean (+/- 1 standard deviation) peak serum digoxin concentration of 2.21 ng/ml (+/- 0.45) at a mean of 2.29 h (+/- 1.52) after administration. A second rise in serum digoxin concentration started about 6-8 h after administration and extended to about 20 h after administration. The mean bioavailability (F) was 23.38% (+/- 5.96). At a dose of 22 microgram digoxin/kg body weight, the intravenous study was characterized by a two-compartment model with the following mean pharmacokinetic measurements: distribution rate constant (alpha), 1.391 h-1 (+/- 0.1909); zero-time serum digoxin concentration determined from the distribution phase (A), 21.247 ng/ml (+/- 5.6614); elimination rate constant (beta), 0.0409 h-1 (+/- 0.0069); zero-time serum digoxin concentration determined from the elimination phase (B), 3.82 ng/ml (+/- 0.433); apparent specific volume of distribution uncorrected for protein binding (Vd beta), 5.003 l/kg (+/- 0.5177). The mean beta corresponded to a biological half-life (T1/2 beta) of 16.9 h. Based upon results of this study, theoretically achievable steady-state serum digoxin concentrations were calculated for maintenance doses given by oral and intravenous routes of administration with appropriate two-compartment, multiple-dose formulae. Loading doses were also calculated for each route. It is the opinion of the authors that the oral route of administration of digoxin is effective in the horse and may preclude the potential risks posed by the high serum digoxin concentrations immediately following intravenous administration.

Administration, Oral↗

Increase in myocardial digoxin content associated with circulatory volume overload in the dog.

1. Tritiated (12alpha-3H) digoxin (0-05 mg/kg body weight) was administered intravenously to conscious dogs with circulatory volume overload induced by previous creation of aorto-caval fistulae. Dogs were killed after 5 min, 1, or 4 h, and the myocardium sampled. Digoxin was extracted and counted and results compared to those in normal dogs. 2. At each time, myocardial digoxin concentration of all cardiac chambers in test dogs was greater than normal. Plasma digoxin concentration measured 5 min after administration was greater in dogs with fistulae but the subsequent levels were not different. 3. Anaesthetized and open-chest dogs with fistulae studied 5 min after digoxin administration had greater myocardial concentrations than similarly studied normal dogs. Although myocardial concentrations of digoxin were higher in anaesthetized than in conscious dogs the group with fistulae had higher values than did the normal group, as was the case for unanaesthetized dogs. 4. The basis for the effect of fistula is probably multifactorial. Diminised peripheral blood flow and peripheral digoxin delivery and uptake, resulting initially in higher digoxin levels in plasma perfusing the myocardium, may play a role. Increased myocardial mechanical and metabolic activity almost certainly are important. Cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac failure per se and plasma electrolyte changes are probably not. 5. The results are consistent with previously demonstrated reduced digitalis tolerance in the dog with circulatory volume overload.

Animals↗

Serum concentrations of digoxin entrapped in liposomes after intravenous administration in dogs.

1. Digoxin was associated into phosphotidylcholine liposomes at concentrations of 28-33 mol% in Hank's Buffer, pH 7.4 at 28 degrees C. 2. Digoxin-liposomes (digoxin concentration 0.022 mg/kg per dog per day) administered intravenously in five adult male dogs attained therapeutic serum concentrations (0.7-3.0 ng/ml) beginning with day 1 of administration. 3. Digoxin serum concentrations obtained by intravenous digoxin-liposomes compared favorably with normal oral digoxin administration (0.022 mg/kg per dog per day) in all 5 dogs monitoring serum digoxin levels for 7 days showed no significant (P < 0.05) differences in mean serum digoxin concentrations +/- s.e.m. on 6 of 7 days of treatments.

Administration, Oral↗

Detection of cone dysfunction induced by digoxin in dogs by multicolor electroretinography.

It is difficult to detect discrete cone function with the present conventional electroretinography (ERG) examination. In this study, we developed contact electrodes with a built-in color (red (644 nm), green (525 nm), or blue (470 nm)) light source (color LED-electrode), and evaluated an experimental model of digoxin in the dog. First, 17 normal Beagle dogs were used to determine which electrode works well for color ERG measurement on dogs. Then, color ERG was performed on seven normal Beagle dogs at various points during a 14-day period of digoxin administration. A single daily dose of 0.0125 mg/kg/day, which is within the recommended oral maintenance dosage range for dogs, was administered orally for 2 weeks. Ophthalmic examination, measurement of plasma concentration of digoxin, and color ERG examination were performed. On first examination, amplitudes of all responses were significantly (P < 0.01) lower with the red, than with the blue and green electrodes during ERG recording. In ERG using the red electrode, the standard deviation was large. According to these preliminary results, the red electrode was not used in the experimental dog model with digoxin. In the digoxin administrated animals, no significant change was observed in the ophthalmic examination findings. The digoxin level increased steadily throughout the dosing period but was always within the therapeutic range for dogs. In rod ERG, no abnormalities were detected with any electrode. In standard combined ERG, decreased amplitude of the a-wave was detected with every electrode. In single flash cone ERG, prolongation of implicit time was detected by color ERG with the blue and green electrodes. In 30-Hz flicker ERG, decreased amplitude was detected only by color ERG with the blue electrode. The decreased amplitude and prolonged implicit time recovered after termination of digoxin administration. Cone dysfunction induced by digoxin in the dog was revealed by multicolor ERG using blue and green LED-electrodes. Multi-color ERG was useful for detecting cone type-specific dysfunction in the dog.

Administration, Oral↗

Binding of digoxin to slow- and fast-twitch skeletal muscle fibres.

We have found previously great interindividual variations in the binding of digoxin to skeletal muscle even after standardized rest. The present study was performed in order to find out if there is a difference in the binding of digoxin to slow- and fast-twitch fibres in man at rest and after moderate exercise. Seven healthy digitalized subjects (digoxin 0.50 mg/day) were investigated after 90 min of supine rest and after a 1 h moderate bicycle exercise. Muscle biopsy specimens were taken immediately before and 5 min after exercise and dissected under a microscope to single fibres. After histochemical typing of all fibres the digoxin content in slow- and fast-twitch fibres was measured separately. At rest, digoxin binding to slow-twitch fibres was 33% higher than to fast-twitch fibres (P less than 0.01). During exercise the digoxin binding increased by 28% in slow-twitch fibres but was unchanged in fast-twitch fibres. The difference in digoxin binding to the two fibre types may explain, at least partly, the interindividual variations in the binding of digoxin to skeletal muscle.

Adult↗

The relationship between cardiotoxicity and plasma digoxin concentration in conscious dogs.

1 The tendency of a given oral dose of digoxin to induce cardiac dysrhythmia was determined indirectly at various times after its administration to eight conscious dogs by measurement of the intravenous dose of acetylstrophanthidin necessary to induce toxic changes in the ECG. Acetyl-strophanthidin was used because its rapid elimination from the body permitted estimates to be made 45, 180 and 360 min after digoxin administration. 2 Each dog underwent four studies in which doses of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg digoxin were used in a randomized sequence allowing at least ten days between each dose. 3 Digoxin reduced the amount of acetylstrophanthidin required to cause toxic changes in the ECG; this increase in cardiac sensitivity was dose-dependent. 4 There was no correlation between plasma levels of digoxin and the tendency to dysrhythmia, since peak plasma concentrations of digoxin were reached at about 60 min after dosing whereas maximal sensitivity to acetylstrophanthidin was found 3 to 6 h after administration of digoxin. 5 These results suggest that there is little or no increased risk of cardiotoxicity during periods of transient increase in plasma levels of digoxin.

Animals↗