Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

A randomized controlled trial to measure the effectiveness of a sacral wedge in preventing postoperative back pain following trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in lithotomy position.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative back pain is a common, yet under reported, complication of surgery. Previous studies, although small in number, have indicated that the use of a sacral wedge is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative back pain. AIM: The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the intra-operative use of a sacral wedge would decrease the incidence of postoperative back pain in patients undergoing trans-urethral resection of the prostate in lithotomy position. METHODS: The design of the study was a randomized controlled trial involving the use of a sacral wedge intra-operatively in a male population undergoing trans-urethral resection of the prostate. A total of 236 participants was recruited to the study and allocated to the control or intervention group by block randomization. All patients selected one of three different sized sacral wedges for use during surgery. Data were collected preoperatively, intra-operatively and at postoperative days 2 and 4 and the tools included a structured questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, a visual analogue scale to measure pain intensity and a body map to record its location. RESULTS: Fifty-two per cent of participants reported having a history of back pain and point prevalence on admission to hospital was 27%. Twenty-eight per cent of participants experienced back pain on day 2 postoperatively and this decreased to 14% on day 4. There was no significant difference between the control and intervention groups. The severity of back pain increased after surgery. Postoperatively there were reports of back pain from participants who had not reported a history of back pain before their admission for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other studies we found no evidence to support the use of a sacral wedge intra-operatively to reduce the incidence of postoperative back pain. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Despite the non-significant results, the high level of postoperative back pain stills draws attention to the need to develop strategies to reduce its incidence.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.

Most patients referred to physiotherapy with low back pain are without a precise medical diagnosis. Identification of subgroups of non-specific low back pain patients may improve clinical outcomes and research efficiency. A pathoanatomic classification system has been developed, classifying patients with non-specific low back pain into 12 different syndromes and three subcategories based on history and physical examination. The purpose of this study was to estimate the inter-tester reliability of clinical tests used as criteria for classifying patients. Ninety patients with chronic low back pain were each examined by two physiotherapists. A total of four physiotherapists conducted the assessments. Examination findings were recorded independently by the two examiners. Percentage of agreement and kappa coefficients were calculated for each category. The overall rate of agreement was 72% and the kappa coefficient was 0.62 for the mutually exclusive syndromes in the classification system. Agreement rates for each of the syndromes ranged from 74% to 100% and kappa coefficients ranged from 0.44 to 1.00. The findings suggest the inter-tester reliability of the system is acceptable. The relatively modest level of total agreement (39%) for the system as a whole might indicate that the utility of the system for general screening purposes is limited, compared with the utility in identification of particular syndromes. Due to low prevalence of positive findings in some of the syndromes, future work should focus on testing reliability on a larger sample of patients, and testing of validity and feasibility of the system.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Back pain and agricultural work among farmers: an analysis of the Colorado Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Survey.

BACKGROUND: Back pain is the most prevalent occupational health problem experienced by much of the world's workforce. However, agricultural work-related back pain occurring among US farmers working on small operations or family farms is usually not included in surveillance. With data collected by Colorado Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Survey, this study reports characteristics of and risk factors for back pain among adult farmers living in eight Colorado counties. METHODS: A stratified probability sample of 500 farms was selected in proportion to the number of farms in study areas. During the 4-year period from 1993 through 1996, 458 farms were enrolled in the study and 759 farmers were interviewed using a questionnaire. Information on self-reported back pain and potential risk factors among 742 white farmers was evaluated and reported here. RESULTS: A total of 194 farmers (26.2%) reported to have had at least one episode of back pain lasting for 1 week or more. Males had a slightly higher prevalence of back pain than females (28.6% vs. 22.5%) and the lower back was the predominantly affected part of body among both males and females. In 45.4% of males and 43.9% of females back pain was brought on by repeated activities. Males' activities at work were more likely to cause back pain while females' activities at home were more likely to cause back pain. Three factors were found to be significantly associated with back pain: being depressed (odds ratio (OR) = 3.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.23-6.09), farming/ranching as main activities (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.17-2.36), and worked in agriculture for 10 to 29 years (OR = 1.62, CI = 1.14-2.30). CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses indicate that back pain is an occupational health problem among farmers on small operations or family farms and that back pain affected males and females differently. The finding of significant positive associations between depression, farming activities, and back pain warrants further attention.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Pain and deception: use of verbal pain measurement as a diagnostic aid in differentiating between clinical and simulated low-back pain.

The pain reports of 553 patients with low back pain and 347 healthy subjects faking low back pain were compared to determine if pain language can be employed as diagnostic aids in differentiating between clinical groups and groups attempting to feign a clinical condition. The best set of discriminating words correctly identified 90% of the subjects using 18 to 54 words in pain description, and 83% using 4 to 17 words in their pain report. The same pain words were used to categorize 366 new pain cases and 202 new fake cases. Cross-validation shrinkage was 8 and 7% respectively. Effectiveness in discriminating between pain and simulation was increased using selective cut-off scores. Patients in active treatment for back pain whose choice of pain words resemble those of the simulators reported 21% more clinical pain in a follow-up validation study suggesting that an accurate representation of malingering may have been achieved using a simulation research design.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

The premenstrual syndrome: psychophysiologic concomitants of perceived stress and low back pain.

The effects of experimentally induced and personally relevant stressors on low back EMG activity during 3 phases of the menstrual cycle in women with the premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual low back pain were examined. Thirty-nine women reporting either PMS and premenstrual severe low back pain (group 1), PMS with premenstrual moderate low back pain (group 2), or those reporting neither condition (group 3) participated. During each of 3 menstrual phase-specific assessment sessions, participants were exposed to a neutral stimulus, an experimentally induced stressor, and 2 personally relevant stressors in a randomized order. Concomitant monitoring of low back EMG activity and heart interbeat interval was undertaken. Results indicated that participants in group 1 evidenced greater EMG changes in response to personal stressors compared to the neutral stimulus and experimentally induced stress during the premenstrual phase. EMG activity in response to personal stress was also significantly higher during the premenstrual phase than during the menstrual and intermenstrual phases for group 1, and higher than EMG changes evidenced by groups 2 and 3 during the same phase. Group 2, while not reporting as severe premenstrual back pain as did group 1, reported moderate levels of back pain and evidenced greater physiological reactivity to a personal stressor than did group 3. The findings highlight the link between personally relevant stressors and concomitant physiologic responsivity and the role that this arousal may play in the maintenance and exacerbation of premenstrual low back pain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Electric behavior of low back muscles during lumbar pelvic rhythm in low back pain patients and healthy controls.

UNLABELLED: The functioning of low back muscles of back pain patients during flexion and reextension has not been properly investigated. In this study, we analyzed rectified, averaged electric activity (RMS EMG) and corresponding raw intramuscular (IM) EMG from lumbar paraspinal muscles to quantify the activity level during simple bending cycles in 87 back pain patients compared to 25 able-bodied controls. THE RESULTS: All functional phases seen in raw IM EMG were also shown in surface RMS EMG. Surface RMS EMG pattern seems to yield more information from activity level than IM EMG pattern. The RMS EMG patterns of back pain patients differed from those of controls as follows: (1) There was clearly noticeable activity during standing in back pain patients. (2) There was only a partial decrease of EMG activity after flexion in back pain patients with current pain. (3) The ratio of mean reached at maximal activity level during extension and flexion was less in patients (1.8, SD = 0.5, p less than .001) than able-bodied controls (3.2, SD = 0.8). (4) Segmental differences were observed in IM EMG activities in patients having hypermobility in bending x-ray. (5) Large peak potentials occurred during movements in patients having segmental hypermobility. THE RESULTS indicate that averaged surface recording is a valuable tool in the investigation of dynamic spine functions in back pain patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Radiofrequency denervation for neck and back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cervical or lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain can only be made by using local anesthesia to block the nerves supplying the painful joint. There is a lack of effective treatment for chronic zygapophyseal joint pain or discogenic pain. Radiofrequency denervation appears to be an emerging technology, with substantial variation in its use between countries. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain disorders. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, PsycLIT, and EMBASE from start to February 2002, plus the Cochrane Library 2002, Issue 2. The references of identified articles were checked and three experts in the field of radiofrequency treatment were consulted to identify studies we might have missed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of radiofrequency denervation for musculoskeletal pain disorders, with no language or date restrictions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers selected RCTs that met predefined inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the main results and methodological quality of the selected trials, using standardized forms. Qualitative analysis was conducted to evaluate the level of scientific evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We found only nine articles, reporting on seven relevant RCTs. Six of the seven were considered to be high-quality. The selected trials included 275 randomized patients, 141 of whom received active treatment. One study examined cervical zygapophyseal joint pain, two cervicobrachial pain, three lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain, and one discogenic low-back pain. The study sample sizes were small, follow-up times short, and there were some deficiencies in patient selection, outcome assessments, and statistical analyses. The level of scientific evidence for the short-term effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation was limited for cervical zygapophyseal joint and cervicobrachial pain, and conflicting for lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain. There was limited evidence suggesting that intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation was not effective for discogenic low-back pain. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The selected trials provide limited evidence that radiofrequency denervation offers short-term relief for chronic neck pain of zygapophyseal joint origin and for chronic cervicobrachial pain; conflicting evidence on the short-term effect of radiofrequency lesioning on pain and disability in chronic low-back pain of zygapophyseal joint origin; and limited evidence that intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation is not effective for chronic discogenic low-back pain. There is a need for further high-quality RCTs with larger patient samples and data on long-term effects, for which current evidence is inconclusive. Furthermore, RCTs are needed in non-spinal indications where radiofrequency denervation is currently used without any scientific evidence.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1998

Low back pain in mineral sand mine workers. Incidence and management.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the prevalence of low back pain suffered by workers in three mineral sand mining companies operating in the south west of Western Australia; to determine what use was made of health care providers by those experiencing low back pain; to derive the perceptions of the value of the treatment for low back pain by health care providers. METHOD: A total of 350 questionnaires were distributed to sand mine workers who were asked to complete the questionnaires which were collected 1 week later. RESULTS: completed questionnaires were returned by 204 workers giving a 58% response rate. Seventy-seven percent of male workers and 60% of female workers could remember suffering low back pain sometime in their lives. Low back pain was experienced by 61% of male sufferers and 57% of female sufferers at least two to three times a month. A total of 16% of men and 12% of women experienced low back pain on a daily basis while 30% of men and 22% of women reported that the type of work they were doing increased their low back pain. Only 19% of all male workers and 6% of all female workers had ever taken time off work due to low back pain with the average time taken off work for an acute episode, being 14 days. Overall, 47% of respondents indicated that the treatment received from general practitioners was ineffective, and only 16% of respondents assessed GPs as being better than average. Chiropractors were rated higher than physiotherapists or general practitioners in providing the most effective treatment for low back pain. Mobilising exercises were considered to be better treatment than analgesics or anti-inflammatory medication. CONCLUSION: Low back pain is a common problem among mineral sand mine workers who preferred the services of the chiropractor or the physiotherapist to the general practitioner. Physical treatment modalities with stretching and mobilising exercises were preferred to pharmacological treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Back pain is a major problem for many pregnant women].

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of back pains, identify their location and the association between age, time of pregnancy, nervous injury and the presence of pain prior to pregnancy. METHODS: Back pain was identified by means of a descriptive study. From January to December of 2001, using a questionnaire structured by the authors, 203 pregnant women arriving for Pre-natal care were interviewed after selection in the waiting rooms of the Primary Health care Units of the city of Paulínia (state of São Paulo). RESULTS: Prevalence of back pain was of 79.8%; of these location in the lumbar region was reported by 80.8% and in the sacroiliac by 49.1% of the pregnant women. Pain was more frequent among younger women. Prevalence of back pain did not increase with progress of pregnancy. Symptoms of nervous injury not related to the site of the back pain were reported by 47.7% of those pregnant. CONCLUSION: Almost 80% of the pregnant women reported back pain at some time during pregnancy. The most often reported sites were the lumbar and sacroiliac. Pain was more frequent among the younger women. Half of the pregnant women reported symptoms of nervous injury.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002.

STUDY DESIGN: Review and analysis of data from two U.S. national surveys in 2002. OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of back pain and physician visits for back pain in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: National data on the prevalence of back pain become available only intermittently. METHODS: We summarized published data from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) on the prevalence of back pain and compared it with earlier surveys. We also analyzed the 2002 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) to determine physician visit rates for back pain. RESULTS: In the 2002 NHIS, there were 31,044 adult respondents. Low back pain lasting at least a whole day in the past 3 months was reported by 26.4% of respondents, and neck pain was reported by 13.8%. Among racial groups, American Indians and Alaska Natives had the highest prevalence of low back pain, and Asian Americans had the lowest. Prevalence generally declined with greater levels of education and increasing income. Prevalence estimates were consistent with those from previous surveys, although methodologic differences limited comparisons. NAMCS data suggested that the proportion of all physician visits attributable to low back pain (2.3% in 2002) has changed little since the early 1990s. CONCLUSIONS: About one fourth of U.S. adults report low back pain in the past 3 months; the proportion of physician visits attributed to back pain has changed little in the past decade.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Reduced risk of back pain following teriparatide treatment: a meta-analysis.

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture and may result in back pain with functional limitations and diminished quality of life. Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] has been shown to increase bone mass and reduce the risk of vertebral and other osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of teriparatide on the risk of back pain in patients with osteoporosis. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and five trials were identified and included in our analyses. All trials were randomized, double-blinded, and parallel with either new vertebral fracture (n=1) or bone mineral density as the primary endpoint (n=4). Four studies were in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and one was in men with idiopathic or hypogonadal osteoporosis. Two trials were placebo controlled, two trials were alendronate controlled, and one trial involved teriparatide plus hormone replacement therapy versus hormone replacement therapy alone. Reports of back pain, defined as new or worsened back pain after initiating the study drug, were obtained from adverse event databases, and the risk of back pain was analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results were not statistically heterogeneous (P=0.60) across trials, and there were no differences between groups administered teriparatide 20 or 40 mcg/day doses (P=0.64). The rates of back pain, moderate or severe back pain, and severe back pain per 100 patient-years were numerically lower in the teriparatide versus comparator groups in each study. Compared with the pooled comparator, patients in the pooled teriparatide group had reduced risk for any back pain [relative risk, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.80)], moderate or severe back pain [relative risk, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48-0.75)] and severe back pain [relative risk, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.28-0.68)]. Separate meta-analyses comparing teriparatide versus placebo or antiresorptive drugs gave similar results. In conclusion, patients randomized to teriparatide had a reduced risk of new or worsening back pain compared to patients randomized to placebo, hormone replacement therapy or alendronate.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Validity of pressure pain thresholds in female workers with and without recurrent low back pain.

Recurrent low back pain (LBP) is a common pain condition in elderly workers in a variety of occupations, but little is known about its origin and the mechanisms leading to an often disabling sensation of pain that may be persistent or intermittent. In the present study we evaluated the pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in subjects suffering from recurrent LBP, as well as in healthy controls, to investigate if recurrent LBP is associated with an increased sensitivity of the muscular and ligamentous structures located on the lower back. One hundred and six female workers, aged between 45 and 62 years and working either in administrative or nursing professions were examined. The subjects were classified into LBP cases and controls based on the Nordic questionnaire. Subjects indicating 8-30 or more days with LBP during the past 12 months were graded as cases. PPTs were measured on 12 points (six on each side of the body) expected to be relevant for LBP (paravertebral muscles, musculus quadratus lumborum, os ilium, iliolumbar ligament, musculus piriformis and greater trochanter), as well as on a reference point (middle of the forehead) using a digital dolorimeter. The PPTs on all points on the lower back highly correlated with each other and a high internal consistency was found with a Cronbach alpha coefficient > 0.95. There was a moderate and significant correlation of the PPT on the forehead with the PPT on the lower back with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.36 to 0.49. In LBP cases from administrative professions, the PPT on the forehead was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The PPT on the lower back did not significantly differ between the four groups studied, namely nurses and administrative workers with and without recurrent LBP. These results give evidence that recurrent LBP is not associated with an altered sensitivity of the muscular and myofascial tissues in the lumbar region. Furthermore, they raise questions about the value of reference point measurements in recurrent LBP.

Administrative Personnel↗
PubMed1994

Physical therapy episodes of care for patients with low back pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although individuals with low back pain frequently receive treatment from a physical therapist, few published studies exist that describe who sees a physical therapist for their low back pain nor is much known about physical therapy episodes of care for this condition. Secondary analysis of data from the American Physical Therapy Association's Survey of Physical Therapy Outpatient Practice provides new descriptive data on services provided to a national, representative sample of patients discharged from hospital-based and private outpatient practices. In addition, specific hypotheses were tested on clinical and background factors believed to influence low back pain episodes of care. SUBJECTS: Patients with low back pain represented over 25% of all outpatient discharges from physical therapy practices. METHODS: A mail survey was conducted with representatives of a national probability sample of facilities that provided outpatient physical therapy services. Data were provided on each facility and on a discharge sample of patients treated at each facility. RESULTS: On average, episodes of care extended over 5 weeks and consisted of 11 therapy visits, for an average charge of $766.70. Duration and charge for low back episodes of care did not differ, on average, in private versus hospital-based practices. Certain aspects of care, however, did vary across regions of the country. Episodes of care charged to workers' compensation were costlier than those charged to other insurance carriers, and whites were charged less, on average, than nonwhites. Duration of back symptoms was related to intensity, duration, and charges incurred for the episode of care. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Further research is needed to understand the reasons for the relationships observed in this study, as well as studies that relate care provided by physical therapists to specific patient outcomes. Further research is also needed to compare outcomes achieved across different health professions.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Exercise therapy is widely used as an intervention in low-back pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in adult non-specific acute, subacute and chronic low-back pain versus no treatment and other conservative treatments. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL databases to October 2004; citation searches and bibliographic reviews of previous systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise therapy for adult non-specific low-back pain and measuring pain, function, return-to-work/absenteeism, and/or global improvement outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-one randomized controlled trials (6390 participants) met inclusion criteria: acute (11), subacute (6) and chronic (43) low-back pain (1 unclear). Evidence was found of effectiveness in chronic populations relative to comparisons at all follow-up periods; pooled mean improvement was 7.3 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.9) for pain (out of 100), 2.5 points (1.0 to 3.9) for function (out of 100) at earliest follow-up. In studies investigating patients (i.e. presenting to healthcare providers) mean improvement was 13.3 points (5.5 to 21.1) for pain, 6.9 (2.2 to 11.7) for function, representing significantly greater improvement over studies where participants included those recruited from a general population (e.g. with advertisements). There is some evidence of effectiveness of graded-activity exercise program in subacute low-back pain in occupational settings, though the evidence for other types of exercise therapy in other populations is inconsistent. There was evidence of equal effectiveness relative to comparisons in acute populations [pain: 0.03 points (95% CI, -1.3 to 1.4)]. LIMITATIONS: This review largely reflects limitations of the literature, including low quality studies with heterogeneous outcome measures, inconsistent and poor reporting, and possibility of publication bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain, particularly in healthcare populations. In subacute low-back pain there is some evidence that a graded activity program improves absenteeism outcomes, though evidence for other types of exercise is unclear. In acute low-back pain, exercise therapy is as effective as either no treatment or other conservative treatments.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.

BACKGROUND: The spectrum of low back pain patients in general practice differs significantly from that in an orthopaedic clinic. The most frequent specific cause of low back pain is nerve-root irritation or compression caused by intervertebral protrusion, and the diagnosis is still problematic. Testing for Lasègue's sign could be a useful way of detecting high-risk patients, but so far the reproducibility of the test has been measured only in hospital-based studies. AIM: To assess the inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in general practice. METHOD: Fifteen General practitioners from Amsterdam and the surrounding areas tested all consecutive low back pain patients who visited them during a period of two years for Lasègue's sign. The test was repeated within two weeks in two samples: sample I consisted of 50 consecutive low back pain patients; sample II consisted of all patients who had pelvic tilt, scoliosis, or positive Lasègue's sign. RESULTS: In sample I, the observation was repeated in 49 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.33, and the proportions of positive and negative agreement were 33% and 96%, respectively. In sample II, the observation was repeated in 48 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.56, whereas the proportion of positive agreement was 67% and the proportion of negative agreement was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in routine general practice seems to be low, but may be similar to the reproducibility observed in hospital settings in selected patients who have a high chance of low back pain owing to a specific disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Epidemiological differences between back pain of sudden and gradual onset.

OBJECTIVE: To explore possible differences in risk factors for low back pain according to its speed of onset. METHODS: We analyzed longitudinal data from 1366 hospital nurses in England who initially had been free from low back pain for at least one month. Risk factors were ascertained from a self-administered baseline questionnaire, and outcomes from serial followup questionnaires. Hazard ratios (HR) for developing a first new episode of low back pain during followup were derived by Cox regression. RESULTS: Low back pain with gradual onset was significantly associated with psychological symptoms measured at baseline [HR 1.7 (95% CI 1.2, 2.4) and higher], but no such association was seen for sudden pain. Low back pain with sudden onset while at work was associated with exposure to specific patient-handling tasks [HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1, 3.0) to 2.8 (95% CI 1.4, 5.5)]. However, symptoms that came on suddenly elsewhere were not related to occupational activity, and low back pain of gradual onset showed little relation to patient-handling. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a useful distinction can be made according to the speed and circumstances of onset of low back pain. If confirmed, they have important implications for the evaluation of ergonomic interventions aimed at reducing back pain.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Does the menstrual cycle and use of oral contraceptives influence the risk of low back pain? A prospective study among female soccer players.

Female sex hormones have been suggested to affect the risk of low back pain. One reason is the fact that back pain is a very common symptom during pregnancy. It also seems to be a more common problem among female than male athletes, e.g. in soccer. Although there are few scientific data supporting a relationship between female sex hormones, use of oral contraceptives and low back pain, many doctors and physiotherapists advise women with low back pain to avoid oral contraceptives. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether low back pain fluctuated during the menstrual cycle and differed between women using and not using oral contraceptives. A questionnaire was sent to 12 female soccer teams; 261 players answered and 50 players (28 with back pain and 22 controls) fulfilled the prospective study. At baseline the players underwent a thorough clinical examination and then filled in a diary concerning menstrual data, back pain, training and matches during one season. A total of 296 menstrual cycles was analysed. No difference in prevalence or severity of back pain was seen between the different phases of the menstrual cycle or between users and non-users of oral contraceptives. Our data do not support the hypothesis that low back pain is influenced by hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle or by use of oral contraceptives.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Low back pain on passive straight leg raising: the anterior theca as a source of pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective clinical and radiologic investigation of two groups of patients presenting with either acute back pain only or acute leg pain only, yet similar restriction in straight leg raising (SLR). OBJECTIVES: To highlight a group of patients presenting with acute low back pain only, yet a restricted SLR normally associated with leg pain (sciatica) caused by a posterolateral disc prolapse. To determine the anatomic source of the pain in the low back pain only group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A restricted SLR is commonly associated with leg pain (sciatica) due to compression of a nerve root by an intervertebral disc prolapse. Previous studies investigating pain patterns on SLR have suggested that central disc prolapses tend to induce back pain whereas the more lateral prolapses induce leg pain. Such research work has involved patients presenting with typical sciatic pain investigated by myelography and undergoing decompressive surgery. There are no studies specifically investigating patients presenting with low back pain only and reduced SLR. METHODS: Two groups of patients, one with acute low back pain only and one with acute leg pain only, yet showing similar restriction in SLR underwent MR imaging. The scans were reviewed "blind" by an experienced spinal radiologist and imaging features recorded according to a detailed protocol. The MR findings were then compared. RESULTS: Significant disc prolapses were seen equally in both groups. The disc prolapses in the back pain only group were more likely to be central, smaller, to compress the theca only, and to be at a higher lumbar level as compared with the leg pain only group. CONCLUSIONS: Acute low back pain associated with significant restriction in SLR is likely to be caused by a disc prolapse compressing the anterior theca.

Acute Disease↗