Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Audiometry”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Neonatal screening with auditory brainstem responses: results of follow-up audiometry and risk factor evaluation.

To determine the incidence and outcome of neurosensory hearing loss in infants, without selection bias, volunteers screened all infants from intensive care and well-baby nurseries of a tertiary care center for risk factors over 1 year; infants with sufficient risk factors were screened for auditory brainstem evoked response. Infants with abnormal findings received audiometric follow-up. Results of a 1-year follow-up study are reported. Risk factor evaluation revealed a 17% incidence of neurosensory hearing loss in a subgroup of infants with multiple risks such as birth weight less than 1500 gm, with perinatal asphyxia, subsequent hypoxemia, and hospital stay greater than 2 months. All infants with permanent hearing loss were assigned to this category. Our results suggest that this population is at greatest risk for early hearing impairment.

Audiometry↗
PubMed1993

Exploration of cochlear function by otoacoustic emissions: relationship to pure-tone audiometry.

The amplitudes, growth functions and detection thresholds of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOE) were measured in 44 normally hearing subjects and 138 patients with two categories of cochlear dysfunctions: (a) acoustic trauma; and (b) presbycusis. Separate sets of experiments were also performed: (a) detection of stimulus frequency emissions; and (b) click EOE. EOE properties were studied around 2 kHz, 1 kHz and 0.75 kHz (+/- 0.1 kHz). A partial correlation and multivariate analysis was carried out to investigate the relationships between EOE properties and puretone auditory thresholds (from 0.25 to 8 kHz, half-octave steps). For each experiment and each frequency, only one highly significant correlation was found, linearly relating the n kHz EOE threshold with the hearing threshold at 2n kHz: there was a shift of about one octave between EOE amplitudes and audiometric data. This means that EOE thresholds give no direct information about the local cochlear state. A simplified model has been implemented, which assumes that EOE thresholds and amplitudes are proportional to the total number of residual active sites along the organ of Corti, i.e., to the total length of active basilar membrane towards the base of the cochlea. It is shown that this model accounts for the results revealed by the statistical analysis and closely fits the experimental data.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1970

Fetal audiometry.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Audiometry↗
PubMed1970

Fetal audiometry.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Audiometry↗
PubMed1985

Evaluation of inner ear damage during conditions with middle ear effusion by use of brainstem audiometry.

The method of auditory evoked brainstem responses (AEBR) was applied on an animal model with two types of well defined middle ear effusions--serous otitis media (SOM) and purulent otitis media (POM). The animals with SOM exhibited fairly normal interpeak latencies but a considerably increased auditory threshold. In contrast, POM mainly affected the latencies of the brainstem evoked potential but also caused a slight increase of the auditory threshold. The results indicate that SOM chiefly causes a conductive hearing loss, while POM also affects the neural circuit.

Animals↗
PubMed1953

Speech audiometry.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Audiometry, Speech↗