Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 811 records · Page 45Linked to original sources

Roles of G-protein-coupled receptor dimerization.

The classical idea that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) function as monomeric entities has been unsettled by the emerging concept of GPCR dimerization. Recent findings have indicated not only that many GPCRs exist as homodimers and heterodimers, but also that their oligomeric assembly could have important functional roles. Several studies have shown that dimerization occurs early after biosynthesis, suggesting that it has a primary role in receptor maturation. G-protein coupling, downstream signalling and regulatory processes such as internalization have also been shown to be influenced by the dimeric nature of the receptors. In addition to raising fundamental questions about GPCR function, the concept of dimerization could be important in the development and screening of drugs that act through this receptor class. In particular, the changes in ligand-binding and signalling properties that accompany heterodimerization could give rise to an unexpected pharmacological diversity that would need to be considered.

Dimerization↗

Monitoring agonist-promoted conformational changes of beta-arrestin in living cells by intramolecular BRET.

Recruitment of beta-arrestin (beta-arr) to agonist-stimulated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has a crucial role in controlling signalling efficacy and selectivity. When translocated to the receptor, beta-arr is believed to undergo important conformational rearrangement necessary for its downstream actions. To probe these changes in living cells, we constructed an intramolecular bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based biosensor, in which beta-arr is sandwiched between the Renilla luciferase (Luc) and the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). We show that the intramolecular BRET between Luc and YFP was significantly increased following GPCR activation, suggesting a conformational rearrangement bringing the amino terminus and carboxyl terminus of beta-arr in closer proximity. Kinetic analysis showed that this conformational change follows the initial beta-arr/receptor engagement. In addition to providing new insights into the agonist-induced conformational rearrangements of beta-arr in living cells, the double-brilliance beta-arr offers a universal biosensor for GPCR activation, allowing the study of native receptors in large-scale screening analysis.

Arrestins↗

Ras-MAP kinase signaling by lysophosphatidic acid and other G protein-coupled receptor agonists.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are extracellular lipid mediators that signal through distinct members of the Edg/LP subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). LPA and S1P receptors are expressed in almost every cell type and can couple to multiple G proteins (G(i), G(q) and G(12/13)) to mediate a great variety of responses, ranging from rapid morphological changes to long-term stimulation of cell proliferation. LPA serves as the prototypic GPCR agonist that activates the small GTPases Ras (via G(i)) and RhoA (via G(12/13)), leading to activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, respectively. This review focuses on our current insights into how Ras-MAPK signaling is regulated by GPCR agonists in general, and by LPA in particular.

Lysophospholipids↗

Angiogenesis and G-protein-coupled receptors: signals that bridge the gap.

Angiogenesis is a mechanism that has repercussions in a number of physiological and pathological situations. Vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor have understandably received enormous research coverage for being the major mediators of new blood vessel growth, often overshadowing other agonist that also have strong angiogenic potential. We wish to put the spotlight on GPCR agonists that undoubtedly have their word to say on the subject of angiogenesis. In this short review, we will discuss our findings along with the work from other groups on the mechanisms by which GPCR agonists, like thrombin and angiotensin II, control a number of angiogenic signals. A complete understanding of these mechanisms could, by the design of new therapeutic strategies, have a strong impact in clinical oncology.

Angiotensins↗

Not so strange bedfellows: G-protein-coupled receptors and Src family kinases.

Src family nonreceptor tyrosine kinases are an integral component of the signal transduction apparatus employed by growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. As such, their role in cellular growth control and malignant transformation has been the subject of intensive investigation. In contrast, classical G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling involves activation of second messenger-regulated serine/threonine kinases or ion channels, and is primarily involved in neurotransmission and the short-term regulation of intermediary metabolism. Over the past decade, this strictly dichotomous model of transmembrane signaling has been challenged by the discovery that GPCRs also exert control over cellular growth, proliferation, and differentiation, and do so by stimulating tyrosine phosphorylation cascades. Several mechanisms, from the direct association of Src family kinases with GPCRs or receptor-associated proteins, to the transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases and focal adhesion complexes by G-protein-mediated signals, permit GPCRs to activate Src family kinases. Conversely, Src activity plays a central role in controlling GPCR trafficking and effects on cell proliferation and cytoskeletal rearrangement. It is now clear that GPCRs and Src family kinases do not belong to separate, exclusive clubs. Rather, these strange bedfellows are intimately involved in multilayered forms of crosstalk that influence a host of cellular processes.

Animals↗

Regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) inhibits androgen-independent activation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells.

Hormones acting through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can cause androgen-independent activation of androgen receptor (AR) in prostate cancer cells. Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins, through their GTPase activating protein (GAP) activities, inhibit GPCR-mediated signaling by inactivating G proteins. Here, we identified RGS2 as a gene specifically downregulated in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Expression of RGS2, but not other RGS proteins, abolished androgen-independent AR activity in androgen-independent LNCaP cells and CWR22Rv1 cells. In LNCaP cells, RGS2 inhibited G(q)-coupled GPCR signaling. Expression of exogenous wild-type RGS2, but not its GAP-deficient mutant, significantly reduced AR activation by constitutively activated G(q)Q209L mutant whereas silencing endogenous RGS2 by siRNA enhanced G(q)Q209L-stimulated AR activity. RGS2 had no effect on RGS-insensitive G(q)Q209L/G188S-induced AR activation. Furthermore, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) was found to be involved in RGS2-mediated regulation of androgen-independent AR activity. In addition, RGS2 functioned as a growth suppressor for androgen-independent LNCaP cells whereas androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells with RGS2 silencing had a growth advantage under steroid-reduced conditions. Finally, RGS2 expression level was significantly decreased in human prostate tumor specimens. Taken together, our results suggest RGS2 as a novel regulator of AR signaling and its repression may be an important step during prostate tumorigenesis and progression.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A concept for G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptor dimers: the transducin/rhodopsin interface.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous and essential in modulating virtually all physiological processes. These receptors share a similar structural design consisting of the seven-transmembrane alpha-helical segments. The active conformations of the receptors are stabilized by an agonist and couple to structurally highly conserved heterotrimeric G proteins. One of the most important unanswered questions is how GPCRs couple to their cognate G proteins. Phototransduction represents an excellent model system for understanding G protein signaling, owing to the high expression of rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors and the multidisciplinary experimental approaches used to study this GPCR. Here, we describe how a G protein (transducin) docks on to an oligomeric GPCR (rhodopsin), revealing structural details of this critical interface in the signal transduction process. This conceptual model takes into account recent structural information on the receptor and G protein, as well as oligomeric states of GPCRs.

Animals↗

Src-family tyrosine kinases, phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Gab1 regulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 activation induced by the type A endothelin-1 G-protein-coupled receptor.

The multisubstrate docking protein, growth-factor-receptor-bound protein 2-associated binder 1 (Gab1), which is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues following activation of receptor tyrosine kinases and cytokine receptors, regulates cell proliferation, survival and epithelial morphogenesis. Gab1 is also tyrosine phosphorylated following activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) where its function is poorly understood. To elucidate the role of Gab1 in GPCR signalling, we investigated the mechanism by which the type A endothelin-1 (ET-1) GPCR induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Gab1. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Gab1 induced by endothelin-1 was inhibited by PP1, a pharmacological inhibitor of Src-family tyrosine kinases. ET-1-induced Gab1 tyrosine phosphorylation was also inhibited by LY294002, which inhibits phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) enzymes. Inhibition of Src-family tyrosine kinases or PI 3-kinase also inhibited ET-1-induced activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase family member, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1. Thus we determined whether Gab1 regulated ET-1-induced ERK1 activation. Overexpression of wild-type Gab1 potentiated ET-1-induced activation of ERK1. Structure-function analyses of Gab1 indicated that mutant forms of Gab1 that do not bind the Src homology (SH) 2 domains of the p85 adapter subunit of PI 3-kinase or the SH2-domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2) were impaired in their ability to potentiate ET-1-induced ERK1 activation. Taken together, our data indicate that PI 3-kinase and Src-family tyrosine kinases regulate ET-1-induced Gab1 tyrosine phosphorylation, which, in turn, induces ERK1 activation via PI 3-kinase- and SHP-2-dependent pathways.

3T3 Cells↗

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor EDG-1 is essential for platelet-derived growth factor-induced cell motility.

EDG-1, encoded by the endothelial differentiation gene-1, is a heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for sphingosine-1-phosphate (SPP) that has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis and cell migration in cultured endothelial cells. Unexpectedly, EDG-1 knockout embryos had a normal blood vessel network, vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, but died in utero owing to massive haemorrhaging as a result of failure of smooth muscle cells and pericytes to migrate around the circumference and reinforce endothelial tubes [Liu, Wada, Yamashita, Mi, Deng, Hobson, Rosenfeldt, Nava, Chae, Lee, et al. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 951-961]. This vascular maturation defect is similar to the phenotype of mice homozygous for disrupted alleles of platelet-derived growth factor B-subunit homodimer (PDGF-BB) or its receptor PDGFR-beta. We found that fibroblasts from EDG-1 null embryos did not migrate toward PDGF or SPP, and inhibition of motility correlated with defective activation of the small guanosine triphosphatase Rac, which is required for lamellipodia formation and directional locomotion [Hobson, Rosenfeldt, Barak, Olivera, Poulton, Caron, Milstien, and Spiegel (2001) Science 291, 1800-1803]. Moreover, we showed that PDGF-directed cell migration requires both sphingosine kinase activation and expression of EDG-1, suggesting a functional link between PDGF signalling and EDG-1. Indeed, treatment of wild-type cells with PDGF transactivated EDG-1 as determined by translocation of beta-arrestin and phosphorylation of EDG-1. These findings reveal a new paradigm for receptor cross-communication in which activation of a GPCR by a receptor tyrosine kinase is critical for cell motility. Our observations might also clarify the role of EDG-1 in vascular maturation and angiogenesis.

Cell Line↗

A potential role for nuclear factor of activated T-cells in receptor tyrosine kinase and G-protein-coupled receptor agonist-induced cell proliferation.

We have studied the role of nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) transcription factors in the induction of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) growth by platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and thrombin, the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists, respectively. NFATc1 but not NFATc2 or NFATc3 was translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus upon treatment of VSMCs with PDGF-BB or thrombin. Translocation of NFATc1 was followed by an increase in NFAT-DNA binding activity and NFAT-dependent reporter gene expression. Cyclosporin A (CsA), a potent and specific inhibitor of calcineurin, a calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine phosphatase involved in the dephosphorylation and activation of NFATs, blocked NFAT-DNA binding activity and NFAT-dependent reporter gene expression induced by PDGF-BB and thrombin. CsA also completely inhibited PDGF-BB- and thrombin-induced VSMC growth, as measured by DNA synthesis and cell number. In addition, forced expression of the NFAT-competing peptide VIVIT for calcineurin binding significantly attenuated the DNA synthesis induced by PDGF-BB and thrombin in VSMCs. Together, these findings for the first time demonstrate a role for NFATs in RTK and GPCR agonist-induced growth in VSMCs.

Animals↗

Mechanisms of cross-talk between G-protein-coupled receptors resulting in enhanced release of intracellular Ca2+.

Alteration in [Ca(2+)](i) (the intracellular concentration of Ca(2+)) is a key regulator of many cellular processes. To allow precise regulation of [Ca(2+)](i) and a diversity of signalling by this ion, cells possess many mechanisms by which they are able to control [Ca(2+)](i) both globally and at the subcellular level. Among these are many members of the superfamily of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), which are characterized by the presence of seven transmembrane domains. Typically, those receptors able to activate PLC (phospholipase C) enzymes cause release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores and influence Ca(2+) entry across the plasma membrane. It has been well documented that Ca(2+) signalling by one type of GPCR can be influenced by stimulation of a different type of GPCR. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated heterologous desensitization between two different PLC-coupled GPCRs. This is not surprising, given our current understanding of negative-feedback regulation and the likely shared components of the signalling pathway. However, there are also many documented examples of interactions between GPCRs, often coupling preferentially to different signalling pathways, which result in a potentiation of Ca(2+) signalling. Such interactions have important implications for both the control of cell function and the interpretation of in vitro cell-based assays. However, there is currently no single mechanism that adequately accounts for all examples of this type of cross-talk. Indeed, many studies either have not addressed this issue or have been unable to determine the mechanism(s) involved. This review seeks to explore a range of possible mechanisms to convey their potential diversity and to provide a basis for further experimental investigation.

Animals↗

Hormonal regulation of phospholipase Cepsilon through distinct and overlapping pathways involving G12 and Ras family G-proteins.

PLCepsilon (phospholipase Cepsilon) is a novel PLC that has a CDC25 guanine nucleotide exchange factor domain and two RA (Ras-association) domains of which the second (RA2) is critical for Ras activation of the enzyme. In the present studies, we examined hormonal stimulation to elucidate receptor-mediated pathways that functionally regulate PLCepsilon. We demonstrate that EGF (epidermal growth factor), a receptor tyrosine kinase agonist, and LPA (lysophosphatidic acid), S1P (sphingosine 1-phosphate) and thrombin, GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor) agonists, stimulate PLCepsilon overexpressed in COS-7 cells. EGF stimulated PLCepsilon in an RA2-dependent manner through Ras and Rap. In contrast, LPA, S1P and thrombin stimulated PLCepsilon by both RA2-independent and -dependent mechanisms. To determine the G-proteins that mediate the effects of these GPCR agonists, we co-expressed constitutively active G-proteins with PLCepsilon and found that G(alpha12), G(alpha13), Rho, Rac and Ral stimulate PLCepsilon in an RA2-independent manner; whereas TC21, Rap1A, Rap2A and Rap2B stimulate PLCepsilon in an RA2-dependent manner similar to H-Ras. Of these G-proteins, we show that G(alpha12)/G(alpha13) and Rap partly mediate the effects of LPA, S1P and thrombin to stimulate PLCepsilon. In addition, the stimulation by LPA and S1P is also partly sensitive to pertussis toxin. These studies demonstrate diverse hormonal regulation of PLCepsilon by distinct and overlapping pathways.

Animals↗

G-protein-coupled receptor regulation of P2X1 receptors does not involve direct channel phosphorylation.

P2X1 receptors for ATP are ligand-gated cation channels, which mediate smooth muscle contraction, contribute to blood clotting and are co-expressed with a range of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors). Stimulation of Galpha(q)-coupled mGluR1alpha (metabotropic glutamate receptor 1alpha), P2Y1 or P2Y2 receptors co-expressed with P2X(1) receptors in Xenopus oocytes evoked calcium-activated chloride currents (I(ClCa)) and potentiated subsequent P2X1-receptor-mediated currents by up to 250%. The mGluR1alpha-receptor-mediated effects were blocked by the phospholipase C inhibitor U-73122. Potentiation was mimicked by treatment with the phor-bol ester PMA. P2X receptors have a conserved intracellular PKC (protein kinase C) site; however, GPCR- and PMA-mediated potentiation was still observed with point mutants in which this site was disrupted. Similarly, the potentiation by GPCRs or PMA was unaffected by chelating the intracellular calcium rise with BAPTA/AM [bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetra-acetic acid tetrakis-(acetoxymethyl ester)] or the PKC inhibitors Ro-32-0432 and bisindolylmaleimide I, suggesting that the regulation does not involve a calcium-sensitive form of PKC. However, both GPCR and PMA potentiation were blocked by the kinase inhibitor staurosporine. Potentiation by phorbol esters was recorded in HEK-293 cells expressing P2X1 receptors, and radiolabelling of phosphorylated proteins in these cells demonstrated that P2X1 receptors are basally phosphorylated and that this level of phosphorylation is unaffected by phorbol ester treatment. This demonstrates that P2X1 regulation does not result directly from phosphorylation of the channel, but more likely by a staurosporine-sensitive phosphorylation of an accessory protein in the P2X1 receptor complex and suggests that in vivo fine-tuning of P2X1 receptors by GPCRs may contribute to cardiovascular control and haemostasis.

Animals↗

Kinetic diversity in G-protein-coupled receptor signalling.

The majority of intracellular signalling cascades in higher eukaryotes are initiated by GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors). Hundreds of GPCRs signal through a handful of trimeric G-proteins, raising the issue of signal specificity. In the present paper, we illustrate a simple kinetic model of G-protein signalling. This model shows that stable production of significant amounts of free Galpha(GTP) (GTP-bound Galpha subunit) and betagamma is only one of multiple modes of behaviour of the G-protein system upon activation. Other modes, previously uncharacterized, are sustained production of betagamma without significant levels of Galpha(GTP) and transient production of Galpha(GTP) with sustained betagamma. The system can flip between different modes upon changes in conditions. This model demonstrates further that the negative feedback of receptor uncoupling or internalization, when combined with a positive feedback within the G-protein cycle, under a broad range of conditions results not in termination of the response but in relaxed oscillations in GPCR signalling. This variety of G-protein responses may serve to encode signal specificity in GPCR signal transduction.

Computer Simulation↗

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma: kinase-dependent and -independent activities in cardiovascular function and disease.

Cardiac function is controlled by GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) which exert their function by triggering numerous signalling pathways, including the activation of PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase). The GPCR-activated PI3Kgamma is weakly expressed in the heart, but the deletion of its expression in mice causes remarkable phenotypes. Indeed, the lack of PI3Kgamma does not modify heart rate and blood pressure, but does increase contractility, particularly in response to stimuli that enhance cardiac contractile force, such as catecholamines. Consistently, treatment of mutant cardiomyocytes with beta-adrenergic agonists causes an abnormal increase in the elevation of cAMP production. On the other hand, PI3Kgamma appears to play a role in mediating the contractile depression exerted by other GPCR agonists, such as PAF (platelet-activating factor), that are released in pathological conditions, such as after an ischaemic insult. The receptor for PAF coupled to G(i) activates PI3Kgamma, which, in turn, is essential to promote Akt phosphorylation, NOSIII (nitric oxide synthase isoform III) activation and the production of nitric oxide, a well characterized cardiodepressing agent. As a whole, PI3Kgamma appears to negatively control cardiac contractility through different signalling mechanisms, thus becoming a possible drug target for the treatment of critical human cardiac pathologies, such as infarction or heart failure.

Animals↗

The third extracellular loop of G-protein-coupled receptors: more than just a linker between two important transmembrane helices.

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are a large family of structurally related proteins, which mediate their effects by coupling with G-proteins. Despite responding to a range of very diverse stimuli, these receptors exhibit a conserved tertiary structure comprising a bundle of seven TM (transmembrane) helices linked by alternating ECLs (extracellular loops) and ICLs (intracellular loops). The hydrophobic environment formed by the cluster of TM helices is functionally important. For example, the 11-cis retinal chromophore of rhodopsin forms a protonated Schiff base linkage to a lysine in TM7, deep within the helical bundle, and small ligands, such as amine neurotransmitters and non-peptide analogues of peptide hormones, also bind within the corresponding region of their cognate receptors. In addition, activation of GPCRs involves relative movement of TM helices to present G-protein interaction sites across the intracellular face of the receptor. Consequently, it might be assumed that the ECLs of the GPCR are inert peptide linkers that merely connect important TM helices. Focusing on ECL3 (third ECL), it is becoming increasingly apparent that this extracellular domain can fulfil a range of important roles with respect to GPCR signalling, including agonist binding, ligand selectivity and receptor activation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-protein coupled receptor, Gpr1, is specifically required for glucose activation of the cAMP pathway during the transition to growth on glucose.

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the accumulation of cAMP is controlled by an elaborate pathway. Only two triggers of the Ras adenylate cyclase pathway are known. Intracellular acidification induces a Ras-mediated long-lasting cAMP increase. Addition of glucose to cells grown on a non-fermentable carbon source or to stationary-phase cells triggers a transient burst in the intracellular cAMP level. This glucose-induced cAMP signal is dependent on the G alpha-protein Gpa2. We show that the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) Gpr1 interacts with Gpa2 and is required for stimulation of cAMP synthesis by glucose. Gpr1 displays sequence homology to GPCRs of higher organisms. The absence of Gpr1 is rescued by the constitutively activated Gpa2Val-132 allele. In addition, we isolated a mutant allele of GPR1, named fil2, in a screen for mutants deficient in glucose-induced loss of heat resistance, which is consistent with its lack of glucose-induced cAMP activation. Apparently, Gpr1 together with Gpa2 constitute a glucose-sensing system for activation of the cAMP pathway. Deletion of Gpr1 and/or Gpa2 affected cAPK-controlled features (levels of trehalose, glycogen, heat resistance, expression of STRE-controlled genes and ribosomal protein genes) specifically during the transition to growth on glucose. Hence, an alternative glucose-sensing system must signal glucose availability for the Sch9-dependent pathway during growth on glucose. This appears to be the first example of a GPCR system activated by a nutrient in eukaryotic cells. Hence, a subfamily of GPCRs might be involved in nutrient sensing.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A novel tachykinin-related peptide receptor. Sequence, genomic organization, and functional analysis.

Structurally tachykinin-related peptides have been isolated from various invertebrate species and shown to exhibit their biological activities through a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for a tachykinin-related peptide. In this paper, we report the identification of a novel tachykinin-related peptide receptor, the urechistachykinin receptor (UTKR) from the echiuroid worm, Urechis unitinctus. The deduced UTKR precursor includes seven transmembrane domains and typical sites for mammalian tachykinin receptors and invertebrate tachykinin-related peptide receptors. A functional analysis of the UTKR expressed in Xenopus oocytes demonstrated that UTKR, like tachykinin receptors and tachykinin-related peptide receptors, activates calcium-dependent signal transduction upon binding to its endogenous ligands, urechistachykinins (Uru-TKs) I-V and VII, which were isolated as Urechis tachykinin-related peptides from the nervous tissue of the Urechis unitinctus in our previous study. UTKR responded to all Uru-TKs equivalently, showing that UTKR possesses no selective affinity with Uru-TKs. In contrast, UTKR was not activated by substance P or an Uru-TK analog containing a C-terminal Met-NH2 instead of Arg-NH2. Furthermore, the genomic analysis revealed that the UTKR gene, like mammalian tachykinin receptor genes, consists of five exons interrupted by four introns, and all the intron-inserted positions are completely compatible with those of mammalian tachykinin receptor genes. These results suggest that mammalian tachykinin receptors and invertebrate tachykinin-related peptide receptors were evolved from a common ancestral GPCR gene. This is the first identification of an invertebrate tachykinin-related peptide receptor from other species than insects and also of the genomic structure of a tachykinin-related peptide receptor gene.

Amino Acid Sequence↗