Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DECONTAMINATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 811 records · Page 45Linked to original sources

Early pulsatile lavage for the decontamination of combat wounds: historical review and point proposal.

Pulsatile lavage is an effective means of irrigation for grossly contaminated wounds. Pulse lavage was first used by oral surgeons in the U.S. Army during the war in Vietnam, and U.S. military investigators pioneered its early development and scientifically validated its efficacy. Modern pulse lavage units are ideally suited for military use because they enable first- and second-echelon medical personnel (including nonphysicians) to rapidly and effectively decontaminate combat wounds with minimal logistic burden. Pulse lavage units should become standard issue in all combat medical supply canisters or Authorized Medical Allowance blocks, and medical personnel should be trained in their use.

History, 20th Century↗

[Decontamination in colorectal surgery].

The results of perioperative decontamination in a series of 136 patients presenting diseases of the colon and rectum are evaluated. Of the total 74 are subjected to operation according to schedule, and 62 are operated on an emergency basis. Perioperatively, metronidazole plus a cephalosporin antibiotic (cephazolin, cephalothin or cephamandol) are administered. Primary anastomoses are done in 32 cases operated according to schedule, and in fourteen patients operated in the emergency room. Insufficiency of the anastomosis is recorded in 3.5 per cent in the former group, and in 15 per cent in the latter group (p > 0.05). Operative wound suppuration occurs in 5.4 per cent against 13 per cent (p > 0.05), with lethality amounting to 1.3 per cent and 19 per cent, respectively (p < 0.001). Postoperative pneumonia is registered in 4 per cent of those operated on schedule and in 9.6 per cent of those operated by urgency (p > 0.05). In either group there is not a single case of operative wound dehiscence. In colorectal operations antibacterial prophylaxis applied perioperatively proves effective in combating systemic and local inflammatory complications.

Aged↗