SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colonoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 811 records · Page 45Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Colonoscopic diagnosis of whipworm infection.

Trichuriasis is an intestinal infection found in human beings which is caused by Trichuris trichiura, more commonly known as whipworm because of its whip-like appearance. It is characterized by the invasion of the colonic mucosa by the adult Trichuris and produces minor inflammatory changes at the sites of localization. It is prevalent throughout the world, especially in tropical areas. Its diagnosis is usually made by identification of the typical eggs in the stool; adult whipworm is rarely seen during colonoscopy. Colonoscopy can directly diagnose trichuriasis, confirming the threadlike form of worms with an attenuated end. The worms can be overlooked, particularly if colon preparation is imperfect. Attenuated whip-like ends of whipworms, which are embedded in the colonic mucosa, were removed with biopsy forceps. We report on 5 cases of whipworm infection that were diagnosed on total colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope is believed to have theoretical advantages over the standard colonoscope, however a systematic evaluation of this instrument in routine clinical practice involving adult patients is lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients (blinded) undergoing colonoscopy in an outpatient endoscopy center by one of 4 experienced colonoscopists had the procedure performed with a standard colonoscope (n=384) or pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope (n=413). Failure to negotiate the sigmoid colon within 10 minutes was regarded as a failure and, if suitable, the patient was crossed over to colonoscopy with the alternative instrument. RESULTS: Median (95% CI) time to the cecum was significantly faster in the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope group (odds ratio 5.0: 95% CI[4.7,5.3] minutes) compared with the standard colonoscope group (odds ratio 5.5: 95% CI[5.2,5.8] minutes, p=0.01). There were 22 failures overall (2.8%), 14 in the standard colonoscope group (3.6%) and 8 in the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope group (1.9%; p=0.1). With regard to the 14 failures in the standard colonoscope group, colonoscopy was attempted with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope in 13 and completed successfully in 12 (92%). The pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope was superior in cases of severe stenosing diverticular disease; two of 27 examinations with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope were rated as failed vs. 12 of 18 with the standard colonoscope (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intubation time was faster with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, but use of this instrument was not associated with a superior cecal intubation rate compared with the standard colonoscope. However, in patients with severe stenosing diverticular disease, the intubation rate with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope was superior.

Cecal Diseases↗

PubMed2000

A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group.

BACKGROUND: After patients have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, it is uncertain whether colonoscopic examination or a barium enema is the better method of surveillance. METHODS: As part of the National Polyp Study, we offered colonoscopic examination and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance to patients with newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Although barium enema was performed first, the endoscopist did not know the results. RESULTS: A total of 973 patients underwent one or more colonoscopic examinations for surveillance. In the case of 580 of these patients, we performed 862 paired colonoscopic examinations and barium-enema examinations that met the requirements of the protocol. The findings on barium enema were positive in 222 (26 percent) of the paired examinations, including 139 of the 392 colonoscopic examinations in which one or more polyps were detected (rate of detection, 35 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 31 to 40 percent). The proportion of examinations in which adenomatous polyps were detected by barium enema colonoscopy was significantly related to the size of the adenomas (P=0.009); the rate was 32 percent for colonoscopic examinations in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.5 cm or less, 53 percent for those in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.6 to 1.0 cm, and 48 percent for those in which the largest adenomas detected exceeded 1.0 cm. Among the 139 paired examinations with positive results on barium enema and negative results on colonoscopic examination in the same location, 19 additional polyps, 12 of which were adenomas, were detected on colonoscopic reexamination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, colonoscopic examination is a more effective method of surveillance than double-contrast barium enema.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1996

Fluoroscopy. A valuable ally during difficult colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: This study determines the pattern of fluoroscopy use during colonoscopy among a group of gastroenterologists and colon and rectal surgeons who have it readily available for each patient. METHODS: One thousand three hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopic examination were studied over a 16-month period. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy was used during 34% of colonoscopic examinations. The frequency of fluoroscopy use was significantly higher for women (41% vs 28%, p < 0.001). Fluoroscopy was most commonly used to precisely locate the colonoscope tip (45%) or during manipulation of troublesome loops of colon (42%), thus accounting for 87% of 677 fluoroscopic checks. The most common location of the colonoscope tip during these fluoroscopic checks was the hepatic flexure (23%) followed by the cecum (20%); 51% involved the right colon. The selective use of fluoroscopy during the more difficult cases was substantiated by the longer procedure time (36 vs 26 min) and significantly lower cecal intubation rate (74% vs 96%, p < 0.002) when fluoroscopy was required. Fluoroscopy also proved to be valuable when precisely locating pathology and teaching colonoscope intubation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists who have fluoroscopy readily available often use it during difficult colonoscopic examinations. Fluoroscopy is most commonly used to maneuver troublesome loops of colon or to precisely locate colonoscope tip position, especially when negotiating the right colon. Although this technology is more frequently required for women, fluoroscopic capability for all colonoscopic examinations is advantageous.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1984

Malignant colon polyps--cure by colonoscopy or colectomy?

Although malignant sessile colon polyps usually require colectomy for proper treatment, the vast majority of malignant pedunculated polyps can be removed colonoscopically for cure. The author's experience with 83 consecutively encountered malignant polypoid lesions is reviewed and is the basis for the discussion herein. All 49 malignant pedunculated polyps were removed colonoscopically. Eight of these patients also underwent colectomy because of questionable or definite presence of cancer cells within the stalk portion of the polyp; no residual cancer was identified at the polypectomy site, and all lymph nodes were negative in these patients. Of 34 patients with malignant sessile polypoid lesions, 13 underwent colectomy because of obvious malignancy at colonoscopy. Twenty-one sessile lesions were removed colonoscopically; with malignancy documented, nine of the 21 patients underwent colectomy. Positive findings (either cancer at the polypectomy site or in lymph nodes) at surgery were identified in two of these nine patients. Colonoscopic polypectomy can be considered curative for malignant pedunculated polyps provided the stalk portion of the lesion is totally uninvolved with the malignant process, provided there is no lymphatic or vascular invasion, the malignancy is well differentiated, and follow-up endoscopic examination of the polypectomy site reveals no residual or recurrence. These four criteria must be satisfied in order to consider a malignant pedunculated polyp curatively removed by colonoscopic polypectomy alone. The risk of colectomy in patients satisfying these four criteria is believed to be greater than the risk of metastatic disease and death from this lesion. Colectomy is recommended for all patients with malignant sessile polypoid lesions, provided their general medical condition provides an acceptable operative risk. Although colonoscopic polypectomy is not recommended for obviously malignant sessile polyps, there are instances where sessile lesions are removed colonoscopically and found microscopically to contain focal or minute areas of invasive cancer. In certain of these patients, the risk of colectomy may exceed the risk of recurrence or metastasis, if the polypoid lesion has been totally removed colonoscopically and completeness of the polypectomy has been documented by follow-up colonoscopy. Each patient's clinical history, general condition, and histopathology must be reviewed individually by a clinician experienced in this field in order to reach a wise and proper decision regarding the potential need for colectomy, and limit colectomy to those patients in whom it is absolutely necessary.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2006

CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Conventional colonoscopy as the gold standard for large-bowel diagnostics and therapy may fail in 5 %-20 % of cases, depending on the experience of the examiner. Colonoscopy is regarded as difficult and painful by many patients. In an attempt to overcome the limitations of conventional colonoscopes, a guide wire-directed, thin, flexible diagnostic colonoscope, the CathCam was developed. In this prospective pilot study, we report its use in patients in whom conventional colonoscopy had failed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 49 patients with a previous or current failure of complete colonoscopy were invited to participate in a trial using the new CathCam system, and 14 (nine men; mean age 59 years) accepted. The CathCam is an 11-mm diameter disposable, multilumen catheter, with visualization by a 3-mm camera with six light-emitting diodes. In the first five patients, the CathCam was inserted over a newly developed 0.024-inch, hinged, lumen-seeking guide wire. Subsequently, a modified combined approach was used: a conventional colonoscope was introduced into the sigmoid or left colon, then the guide wire was advanced as far as possible, followed by CathCam insertion over it. Caecal intubation rate, insertion times and patient discomfort were recorded; patients received low-dose midazolam sedation (2-5 mg). RESULTS: One patient was excluded during colonoscopy. The caecum could be eventually reached in 12 of 13 patients; in the remaining patient a significant sigmoid stricture could be passed, but further advancement appeared too risky. The mean caecal intubation time was 24 minutes (range 3-105 min). Only two patients experienced pain and discomfort during the procedure (one immediate assessment and one case reported at later telephone interview). No complications occurred, and previously undiagnosed important findings were obtained in 9 cases. CONCLUSIONS: A combined approach, consisting of guide wire insertion via a partially introduced colonoscope followed by CathCam or colonoscope insertion into the caecum was successful in over 90 % of patients with previous failure of complete colonoscopy. Further improvements may make this system suitable for use as a standard diagnostic colonoscope, either as a single unit (CathCam plus guide wire) or using the guide wire alone with a standard colonoscope in difficult cases.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

OBJECTIVE: Polyps are missed during conventional colonoscopy, even with meticulous technique. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a prototype wide angle colonoscope is associated with a reduced miss rate for polyps. METHODS: Two studies were performed. In study 1, a total of 50 patients underwent back-to-back, same-day colonoscopy by a single examiner with the prototype wide angle colonoscope and with a standard colonoscope, with the order of scopes randomized. In study 1, an attempt was made to keep examination time with the two colonoscopes equal. In study 2, a total of 20 patients were examined, 10 by the same colonoscopist who performed study 1 and 10 by a second colonoscopist. In study 2, examiners tried to perform the examinations as quickly as accuracy would allow. RESULTS: In study 1, the miss rate for all polyps was lower with the wide angle colonoscope (20% vs 31%; p = 0.046), although the mean examination time with the wide angle instrument was shorter (6.75 min vs 7.64 min; p = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in detection of adenomas. Polyps, including adenomas, were missed in the peripheral endoscopic field more frequently with the standard colonoscope. In study 2, wide angle colonoscopy was associated with reductions in examination time of 25% and 30% for the two examiners, respectively. Miss rates were the same for one colonoscopist but were higher for the other colonoscopist when the wide angle instrument was used. CONCLUSION: A prototype wide angle colonoscope did not eliminate polyp miss rates. Wide angle colonoscopy has the potential to reduce examination time and improve visualization of the periphery of the endoscopic field of view, but improvements in resolution are needed.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Efficacy of use of colonoscopy in dextran sulfate sodium induced ulcerative colitis in rats: the evaluation of the effects of antioxidant by colonoscopy.

The goals in developing animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are to determine the underlying mechanisms and the action of currently available drugs and to evaluate the value of new therapeutic approaches. Because of the difficulty in determining the severity of colitis in living animals, it has been necessary to kill the experimental animals at varying stages in the studies. If colonoscopic evaluation or endoscopic biopsy is feasible in these experimental animals, continuous observations could be possible, thus avoiding the need to kill them. The aims of the current study were to assess the efficacy of endoscopic examination as a monitoring tool for the severity of colitis in rats and to the efficacy of DA-9601, an extract from Artemisia asiatica which has both antioxidative and cytoprotective actions, on dextran sulfate sodium induced ulcerative colitis in rats endoscopically. Sprague-Dawley rats received 4% DSS in drinking water for 5 consecutive days. Either DA-9601 or sulfasalazine was administered twice a day for 8 days, starting 3 days before DSS administration. After the colonoscopic evaluations on days 2, 4, and 5 after DSS administration the rats were also killed for gross and histopathological evaluations. Simultaneous measurements of malondialdehyde (MDA) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities were performed. There was a statistically significant correlation between the scores evaluated by the gross examination and colonoscopic scores, between the colonoscopic scores and the levels of MDA or mucosal MPO activities, and between colonoscopic scores and histopathological activity index. DA-9601 showed excellent improvement in gross lesion scores, decreased MDA amounts and MPO activities compared to sulfasalazine. In conclusion, the introduction of appropriate colonoscopic examination in animal models of IBD could avoid the sacrifice of experimental animals for interim evaluation and provide the valuable information on the course and efficacy of treatment. The potential usefulness of antioxidants in treating IBD is very promising based on the colonoscopic intervention of IBD.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Endoscopic decompression for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is often treated by colonoscopic decompression. Efficacy, safety, and outcome of endoscopic decompression was assessed. METHODS: Colonoscopic decompressions from 1988 to 1994 were reviewed. Resolution without further endoscopic intervention was defined as clinical success. RESULTS: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction was diagnosed in 50 patients. Thirty-three cases followed surgery or trauma and 17 developed during severe medical illness. Orthopedic joint surgery was most common. Nineteen of 50 patients (38%) had severe underlying medical disease. Forty-one patients (82%) had one colonoscopic decompression with clinical success in 39 (95%). Nine patients (18%) required multiple (2 to 4) colonoscopic decompressions with clinical success in 5 (56%). A decompression tube positioned in the right colon (57%) and in the transverse colon (33%) had similar clinical success. In 8 procedures a decompression tube was not placed, with poor clinical success (25%). The overall clinical success of colonoscopic decompression was 88% (44 of 50). An endoscopic perforation occurred in 1 patient (2%). Overall hospital mortality was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic decompression is effective and safe for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction that does not respond to conservative therapy. Most patients will respond to one colonoscopic decompression with decompression tube placement. Complete colonoscopy and cecal tube placement is unnecessary.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2007

A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the "gold standard" for colorectal polyp and cancer detection, but important lesions may be missed on the proximal aspect of haustral folds, rectal valves, or flexures. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate a prototype auxiliary imaging device that extends beyond the colonoscope's tip, providing a continuous retrograde view to detect lesions missed by the forward-viewing colonoscope. DESIGN: Three anatomic models of the colon were prepared with simulated polyps, 32% in obvious locations and 68% on the proximal aspect of folds. Six endoscopists examined each model with two methods. Method A used a standard video colonoscope. Method B involved an identical colonoscope with a retrograde-viewing auxiliary device positioned within its instrument channel. Order of testing was randomized and blinded. SETTING: Laboratory bench. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Detection rates for simulated polyps. RESULTS: Of 78 "obvious" polyps, 69 (88%) and 70 (90%) were detected by methods A and B, respectively (P > .9). In contrast, of 162 polyps on proximal aspects of folds, 20 (12%) and 131 (81%) were detected by methods A and B, respectively (P < .00001). LIMITATIONS: Limitations resulted from (1) use of commercially available anatomic models in which haustral folds are less prominent and more rigid than in humans and (2) evaluation of a prototype device that had larger size and narrower angle of view than the planned production model and that was fixed in relation to the colonoscope. CONCLUSIONS: In simulated testing, a retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device used with a standard video colonoscope significantly improves detection rates of simulated polyps and promises to enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in humans.

Colonic Polyps↗

PubMed2006

Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").

OBJECTIVES: Unsedated colonoscopy is an uncomfortable procedure for most patients. Discomfort during colonoscopy is largely related to looping of the colonoscope, which displaces the colon from its native configuration and stretches attachments to the mesentery. A novel computer-assisted colonoscope utilizes a fully articulated, computer-controlled insertion tube. On manual insertion of the colonoscope, the position and angle of the scope's tip are encoded into a computer algorithm. As the colonoscope is advanced, the computer directs each successive segment to take the same shape that the tip had at a given insertion depth. The insertion tube thus changes its shape at different insertion depths in a "follow-the-leader" manner. METHODS: This initial clinical trial with this novel colonoscopy system was designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, unblinded, feasibility study. Three physicians of varying levels of experience participated in the study. RESULTS: Eleven consecutive patients (seven men, four women, age range 19-80) meeting inclusion criteria for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were enrolled in the study. The cecum was reached in 10 consecutive patients (100%). Findings included diverticular disease in two cases and multiple colonic polyps in two cases. Postprocedure assessment at discharge, 48 h, and 30 days revealed no complications or adverse effects. Physician satisfaction and patient acceptance of this new technique were high. CONCLUSIONS: In this limited, first of its kind feasibility study, the computer-assisted colonoscope was shown to perform colonoscopy safely and effectively. The colonoscope's unique design limited loop formation during colonoscopy. Large-scale clinical trials are indicated.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The clinical significance of colonoscopy in hemorrhagic colitis due to enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although hemorrhagic colitis due to enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 (O157) infection has recently attracted increasing attention as an important enteric infection, the colonoscopic findings associated with this disease have not been sufficiently characterized. The aim of this study is to characterize the colonoscopic features of hemorrhagic colitis due to O157 infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The colonoscopic findings in ten patients with hemorrhagic colitis due to O157 infection were retrospectively reviewed. To assess the severity of inflammation in each part of the large intestine, colonoscopic findings were categorized into four grades: grade 1, intact mucosa; grade 2, sporadic erythema and erosion; grade 3, mostly diffuse inflammation; and grade 4, diffuse, severe inflammation. RESULTS: Eight out of ten patients had grade 4 findings in the cecum and ascending colon, grade 3 in the transverse colon and descending colon, and grade 2 in the sigmoid colon. Two of these eight patients also had grade 4 inflammation in the proximal transverse colon. Five of these eight patients revealed longitudinal ulcer-like lesions in the transverse colon and/or descending colon. The remaining two patients had grade 3 findings in the cecum to the descending colon and grade 2 findings in the sigmoid colon. All patients exhibited grade 1 finding in the terminal ileum and the rectum. Based on these colonoscopic findings, the ten patients were divided into the typical group (eight patients) and the mild-type group (two patients). CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic colonoscopic findings in most patients with hemorrhagic colitis due to O157 infection were as follows: 1) severe inflammation, including primarily marked edema and facile hemorrhage, and 2) inflammation predominating at the right-side colon; and 3) frequent appearance of longitudinal ulcer-like lesions.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Inflammatory bowel disease.

Patients with extensive ulcerative and Crohn's colitis represent a group at high risk for developing colorectal cancer. Two clear independent risk factors for developing colorectal cancer in patients with chronic colitis include duration and extent of disease. Cancers in chronic colitis do not develop from a colonoscopically recognizable adenomatous polyp similar to that in sporadic colon cancer, but instead arises from flat dysplastic epithelium that is typically not colonoscopically distinguishable from adjacent nondysplastic epithelium. All patients with extensive disease require active management of their increased cancer risk. Active management of cancer risk in chronic long-term colitis should not be presumed to be equivalent to colonoscopic surveillance. There is little data with which to reassure a patient regarding the efficacy of colonoscopic surveillance. A reasonable alternative to colonoscopic surveillance in patients with ulcerative colitis is the restorative proctocolectomy (ileoanal pull-through), which maintains continence and avoids a stoma and appliance. If colonoscopic surveillance is undertaken, a clear understanding of what the definition of a positive surveillance test, ie, when surgical action is taken, is pivotal to the success of the surveillance program. There are now ample data confirming that the finding of any unequivocal dysplasia (low- or high-grade) is associated with a high risk of coexistent or future colorectal cancer. Dysplasia confirmed by a second pathologist (preferably an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist) should prompt a recommendation for colectomy. Future cancer surveillance in chronic colitis will almost certainly involve some applied molecular genetic test.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Outbreak of glutaraldehyde-induced proctocolitis.

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of hemorrhagic proctocolitis occurred after the introduction of 2% glutaraldehyde as a disinfectant for colonoscopes. An inadequate rinsing procedure was detected. Recent studies have pointed to glutaraldehyde as an irritant potentially capable of inducing colitis. This study aimed to measure retrospectively the occurrence of proctocolitis after colonoscopy in persons exposed to glutaraldehyde used as a disinfectant for colonoscopes, and to compare this rate with that in patients exposed to the previous cleaning procedure. METHODS: Colonoscopic procedures were randomly selected during the period when glutaraldehyde was used, as well as during the previous period, when a detergent was used. Patients were asked to respond to a questionnaire during a telephone interview, in search of symptoms compatible with proctocolitis after colonoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 400 colonoscopic procedures selected during each of the glutaraldehyde and the detergent periods, respectively 299 and 242 were evaluable. According to different nonexclusive definitions, we observed in the glutaraldehyde period higher frequencies of proctocolitis (at least five stools/day; 14/299 vs 3/242, p = 0.02), severe proctocolitis (> 10 stools/day; 10/299 vs 1/242, p = 0.04), and severe hemorrhagic proctocolitis (6/299 vs 0/242, p = 0.04). Younger age was associated with proctocolitis only during the glutaraldehyde period (p = 0.0008). No pathogen was demonstrated in the only two patients who had stool cultures. The median incubation after colonoscopy was 4 hours (range 0 to 24 hours) and the symptoms lasted 30 hours (range 6 to 216 hours). No patient had fever, and the illness resolved spontaneously in all cases. CONCLUSION: Inadequate rinsing of colonoscopes after immersion in glutaraldehyde may result in proctocolitis, presumably caused by direct action on the mucosa.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Contamination of single-use biopsy forceps: a prospective in vitro analysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that single-use biopsy forceps prevent interpatient transmission of infection during endoscopy. Passage of sterile forceps through the accessory channel of the endoscope may lead to contamination, however, if the endoscope has been inadequately processed. The potential for contamination of single-use biopsy forceps at various stages of endoscope reprocessing was prospectively evaluated. METHODS: A total of 50 disposable biopsy forceps were passed through the accessory channels of 10 colonoscopes at the following stages of reprocessing: (1) before use in patients to establish a baseline of high-level disinfection, (2) directly after colonoscopy to confirm contamination with use, (3) after manual cleaning and flushing of the accessory channel to support the claim that manual cleaning significantly decreases bioburden, (4) after manual cleaning and a 2-minute soak in 2% glutaraldehyde to assess for contamination after an inadequate cleaning time, and (5) after manual cleaning and a 20-minute soak in 2% glutaraldehyde. The forceps were then sealed in sterile plastic bags after adding 20 mL of thioglycollate broth medium. The suspension was passed through a 0.2-micron vacuum filter and the filters were cultured. All cultures were incubated more than 48 hours. RESULTS: Biopsy forceps underwent a total of 50 aerobic and 50 anaerobic cultures. Colony-forming units too numerous to count of GI flora, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Clostridium species, grew on 19 of 20 culture plates from biopsy forceps passed through colonoscopes immediately after use. One plate in this group grew 3 colony-forming units of E coli. Persistence of GI flora was noted on 5 of 20 plates after manual cleaning of the colonoscopes. No GI flora were found on forceps after the colonoscopes after soaking in gluteraldehyde for 2 and 20 minutes. Environmental contaminants including diptheroids, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus species grew on 16 culture plates. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Single-use biopsy forceps are highly susceptible to contamination during passage through the accessory channels of improperly cleaned endoscopes. (2) Disinfection of the colonoscopes in this study prevented contamination of the forceps at baseline and after reprocessing. (3) Proper endoscope reprocessing may be the most important factor in preventing biopsy forceps-related interpatient infection.

Bacteria↗

PubMed1999

Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: Total colonoscopy with use of a standard adult colonoscope can be difficult in the presence of a redundant or angulated colon. It is often possible to traverse these areas with the use of a thinner, more flexible endoscope. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of completing total colonoscopy using a push enteroscope when a standard colonoscope was unsuccessful. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed for 721 consecutive colonoscopies attempted by two gastroenterologists. Those patients in whom complete colonoscopy was unsuccessful using the standard colonoscope (Olympus CF-100L) had attempts to complete colonoscopy using the enteroscope (Olympus SIF-100). The extent of each exam was recorded. Additional pathologic findings discovered by the use of the enteroscope and therapeutic interventions performed were additionally noted. RESULTS: Colonoscopy using an enteroscope was performed in 32 patients with successful total colonoscopy in 22 patients (68.7%). Additional pathology was noted in nine patients who had successful complete colonoscopy using the enteroscope; adenomatous polyp (n = 5), adenocarcinoma (n = 1), bleeding source (n = 2), and extent of colitis (n = 1). Total colonoscopy rate using standard adult colonoscope was 93.2% (630 of 676) when cases with poor bowel preparation (n = 23) and obstructing lesions (n = 14) were excluded. When the results of successful colonoscopies with the enteroscope were included, the overall completion rate of total colonoscopy improved to 96.4% (652 of 676). CONCLUSION: The use of the enteroscope to help evaluate patients who have had incomplete colonoscopies with the standard colonoscope increases the diagnostic yield of colonic examination.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Differential diagnosis of dysplasia-associated lesion or mass and coincidental adenoma in ulcerative colitis.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate factors that influenced differential diagnosis of dysplasia-associated lesion or mass and coincidental adenoma in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Among 346 patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent colonoscopy between 1979 and 1995, 27 patients had macroscopic neoplastic lesions and were divided into two groups: those with dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (16 patients) and those with adenoma (11 patients), each being categorized by the presence and absence of dysplasia in the flat mucosa adjacent to the elevated lesions, respectively. RESULTS: Thirteen of 27 patients had dysplasia-associated lesion or mass detected by colonoscopic biopsy; 10 of these patients underwent colectomy, and all had dysplasia-associated lesion or mass in the colectomy specimens. Two patients whose biopsy findings were adenoma had an unsuspected dysplasia-associated lesion or mass in the operative specimens. In the remaining 12 patients, the macroscopic lesions were excised during colonoscopy because of clinical and colonoscopic evidence of adenoma. One of them was proved to have dysplasia-associated lesion or mass, and the other 11 were confirmed as having adenoma in the polypectomy specimens. Patients with dysplasia-associated lesion or mass were significantly younger (P < 0.05), had longer duration of ulcerative colitis (P < 0.01), and had more extensive disease (P < 0.005) than those with adenoma. The colonoscopic appearance was plaque-like in 13, sessile in 13, and pedunculated in 2 of the 28 lesions with dysplasia-associated lesion or mass, whereas it was plaque-like in only 1 and sessile or pedunculated in 15 of the 16 lesions with adenoma (P < 0.001). The mean size of the lesions that were considered to be dysplasia-associated lesions or mass and adenoma was 1.8 and 0.5 cm, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic biopsy for detection of dysplasia in the flat mucosa adjacent to macroscopic neoplastic lesions is an appropriate preoperative approach to distinguish dysplasia-associated lesions or mass from adenomas in patients with ulcerative colitis. The statistically significant variables that influenced the differential diagnosis were age, duration of disease, extent, tumor size, and tumor colonoscopic appearance.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2002

The role of colonoscopy in the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with atypical presentations.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen. Despite recent advances in radiologic imaging, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis may be difficult on occasion. The aims of this study were to describe the colonoscopic features of appendicitis and to determine whether colonoscopy can be used as an adjunct for the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with atypical presentations. METHODS: The colonoscopic findings in 21 patients (14 men, 7 women; average age 55 years) with a colonoscopic or histopathologic diagnosis of appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively. Colonoscopy was performed because diagnoses suggested by CT were other than acute appendicitis (11 patients), and/or the presenting clinical features were atypical for acute appendicitis with the duration of symptoms being 10 days or longer (17 patients). RESULTS: The colonoscopic diagnosis was acute appendicitis for all 21 patients. Seventeen underwent appendectomy, the diagnosis being verified in all cases. Of the 4 patients whose symptoms improved without appendectomy, 3 were considered to have acute appendicitis because pus was seen to drain from the appendiceal orifice at colonoscopy. A definite diagnosis could not be made in the remaining 1 patient. Therefore, the diagnosis of appendicitis was considered confirmed in 20 of 21 patients. Colonoscopic findings in these 20 patients included hyperemia (15) and bulging (18) at the appendiceal orifice area with surrounding mucosal edema (19), and drainage of pus from the appendiceal orifice (7). CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy may be useful in the diagnosis of appendicitis when the clinical presentation is atypical for appendicitis and/or imaging studies are nondiagnostic.

Abdomen, Acute↗