Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 811 records · Page 45Linked to original sources

The prevalence of low back pain in the elderly. A systematic review of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN: The prevalence of low back pain in the older population (> = or 65 years) was reviewed in an analysis of the literature from 1966 to the present. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of low back pain in the geriatric population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain is one of the most frequently reported conditions affecting the adult population. However, the prevalence of low back pain in the older age population is not accurately known. METHODS: A methodologic search of five computerized bibliographic databases was performed to identify citations on the prevalence of low back pain in the elderly. Data were summarized, and prevalence studies were critically appraised in detail for their quality. RESULTS: There is wide variability in the reported prevalence of back pain. Many factors have been proposed to explain these findings including sample source, study design, definitions of back pain, and use of patient-reported data. Comorbidity among older patients also contributes to the variability in the reporting of prevalence of back pain. CONCLUSION: There is an under-representation of the older population in the back pain literature. The data in the current study suggest that the prevalence of low back pain in this population is not known with certainty and is not comparable with that in the younger population. The authors stress the need for future studies to improve the reporting of age information to make prevalence studies more informative and applicable.

Aged↗

Back pain among echocardiographers.

OBJECTIVE: By having to adopt unnatural postures, echocardiographers place themselves at risk of back injury. The present study sought to document the incidence and severity of back pain among echocardiographers, and to identify personal, lifestyle and occupational characteristics that may predict risk of back pain. DESIGN: A questionnaire concerning occupational, personal, and lifestyle characteristics, as well as the extent and severity of back pain was completed and returned by 183 echocardiographers. RESULTS: The standard echocardiography examination position of "machine on the left, patient on the right, and transducer held in the right hand" (used by 66% of respondents) greatly increased the risk of back pain (odds ratio (OR) = 4.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.49-16.4). Echocardiographers with more than 11 years experience in the field were also at risk of back pain (OR) = 3.4; 95% CI = 0.97-11.6). The intensity of back pain was strongly associated with the amount of time spent on echocardiography examinations (P = 0.035), limitation of lifestyle (P < or = 0.001), and interference with work (P < or = 0.001). There was a significantly higher relative risk of back pain for the respondents whose job involved frequent or occasional lifting compared with nonlifters (P = 0.01; OR = 4.8, 95% CI = 1.25-18.7). At least some limitation of lifestyle from back pain was reported by 56% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of back pain among echocardiographers, and specific tasks and activities increase the risk of back pain. Further research should focus on preventative measures and optimum work station designs that may serve as a guide to echocardiography departments.

Back Pain↗

Risk factors of back pain frequency in schoolchildren: a search for explanations to a public health problem.

UNLABELLED: This study examined physical, behavioral and social factors associated with schoolchildren's back pain. Factors associated with back pain were also identified using a stepwise regression method. The study was based on a self-administered questionnaire survey of a random national sample of 2173 Icelandic 11-12 and 15-16-y-old schoolchildren. It found that older subjects tended to report back pain more frequently than younger children. Back pain showed significant associations with different aspects of physical condition such as chronic health conditions, tiredness and physical fitness. A number of behavioral factors including participation in sports, television viewing, eating habits and smoking also had a relationship with back pain. Finally, children with lower social support were more likely to experience back pain. CONCLUSION: Overall, four major factors (age, morning tiredness, eating habits and parental support) emerged as factors associated with back pain in the study subjects. These results highlighted the roles of lifestyle and social factors in the experience of back pain in schoolchildren.

Adolescent↗

Effect of alendronate on limited-activity days and bed-disability days caused by back pain in postmenopausal women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Women with new vertebral fractures have an increased risk of back pain and functional limitation because of back pain. Alendronate sodium treatment reduces the risk of new vertebral fracture by 50% in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of alendronate therapy on days affected by back pain in postmenopausal women with existing vertebral fractures. DESIGN: Three-year, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Fifteen university-based research clinics in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2027 postmenopausal women aged 55 to 81 years with low femoral neck bone density and a preexisting vertebral fracture. INTERVENTION: Alendronate sodium (5 mg/d for 2 years and 10 mg/d for the third year) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence and severity of back pain, number of days with back pain, and number of days of bed rest or limited activity because of back pain during 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Irrespective of treatment assignment, women with new, clinically recognized vertebral fractures during follow-up had an increased risk of days of bed disability and days of limited activity because of back pain after the fracture. Women receiving alendronate reported an average of 3.2 fewer days of bed rest (P = .001) and 11.4 fewer days of limited activity (not including days of bed rest) because of back pain (P = .04) during follow-up than those receiving placebo. In the alendronate group, relative to the placebo group, there was a reduced risk of 1 or more bed-rest days (relative risk, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.87), of 7 or more bed-rest days (0.44; 0.30-0.64), and of 7 or more limited-activity days (0.87; 0.76-0.99). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in the frequency of days of back pain or increases in back-related disability between baseline and study end. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with preexisting vertebral fracture, alendronate therapy for 3 years reduced the number of days of bed disability and days of limited activity caused by back pain.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Manipulative therapy and/or NSAIDs for acute low back pain: design of a randomized controlled trial [ACTRN012605000036617].

BACKGROUND: Acute low back pain is a common condition resulting in pain and disability. Current national and international guidelines advocate general practitioner care including advice and paracetamol (4 g daily in otherwise well adults) as the first line of care for people with acute low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are advocated in many guidelines as second line management options for patients with acute low back pain who are not recovering. No studies have explored the role of NSAIDs and/or SMT in addition to first line management for acute low back pain. The primary aim of this study is to investigate if NSAIDs and/or SMT in addition to general practitioner advice and paracetamol results in shorter recovery times for patients with acute low back pain. The secondary aims of the study are to evaluate whether the addition of SMT and/or NSAIDs influences pain, disability and global perceived effect at 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after onset of therapy for patients with significant acute low back pain. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper presents the rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial examining the addition of NSAIDs and/or SMT in 240 people who present to their general practitioner with significant acute low back pain.

Acute Disease↗

Five-year follow-up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A controlled clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term effect of an informative approach to low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In management and prevention of low back pain, back school based on an ergonomic approach have played in important role. The effect of such informative interventions is not clear. METHODS: A 5-year follow-up study was done on patients included in a previous study. The outcome was measured by return to work or still on sick leave. The patients were allocated to an intervention group (n = 245) and a control group (n = 244). Only the intervention group was called in for examination and intervention and answered a battery of tests for psychological and health factors. The intervention apart from the clinical examination consisted of education in an "mini back school." The program was based on a new medical model for low back pain. RESULTS: Forty-seven (19%) of the patients in the intervention group, compared with 84 patients (34%) in the control group, were still on sick leave after 5 years (P < 0.001). There were fewer recurrences of sick leave (P < 0.03) in the intervention group than in the control group. Based on Internal Health Locus of Control, number of children, and income, 75% were correctly classified as nonreturners in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that subchronic low back pain may be managed successfully with an approach that includes clinical examination combined with information for patients about the nature of the problem, provided in a manner designed to reduce fear and give them reason to resume light activity.

Adolescent↗

Prevalence and clinical features of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain: a study in an Australian population with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of pain arising from the zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain and to determine whether any clinical features could distinguish patients with and without such pain. METHODS: Sixty three patients with chronic low back pain were studied prospectively. All patients underwent a detailed history and physical examination as well as a series of intra-articular zygapophysial joint injections of 0.5% bupivacaine starting at the symptomatic level to a maximum of three levels or until the pain was abolished. They also received injections of normal saline into paraspinal muscles to act as controls. RESULTS: All patients proceeded with the injections. Twenty (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20 to 44%) obtained greater than 50% relief of their pain following the administration of saline. Fifty seven patients completed the study; 23 of them (40%; 95% CI 27 to 53%) failed to obtain relief following the injection of saline but obtained relief following one or more intra-articular injections of local anaesthetic. None of the historical features or clinical tests could discriminate those patients with and those without zygapophysial joint pain. CONCLUSION: Pain originating from the zygapophysial joint is not uncommon, but this study failed to find any clinical predictors in patients with such pain.

Aged↗

Perils and pointers in the evaluation and management of back pain.

This article examines the current treatment of low back pain in light of the recent Agency for Health Care Practice and Research (AHCPR) guidelines on the acute management of low back pain (the AHCPR is an agency of the federal government). The article describes the most important history questions, the most helpful physical signs, and the most practical examination techniques. Considerable emphasis is placed on ruling out the "red flag" diagnoses that require immediate treatment. The article agrees with the AHCPR that if the red flags of cancer, infection, fracture, and neurologic deficit are ruled out, most of the remaining causes of acute back pain are largely self-healing over 4-8 weeks. Emphasis is placed on using the history and physical examination rather than expensive studies to rule out the red flag cases, so that cost-effective management of low back pain is possible. The author also reviews the ten top causes of low back pain and their evaluation and treatment.

Back Pain↗

Pain-related fear, lumbar flexion, and dynamic EMG among persons with chronic musculoskeletal low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between pain-related fear, lumbar flexion, and dynamic EMG activity among persons with chronic musculoskeletal low back pain. It was hypothesized that pain-related fear would be significantly related to decreased lumbar flexion and specific patterns of EMG activity during flexion and extension. STUDY DESIGN: Data was obtained from subjects who, on a single day, completed self-report measures of pain and pain-related fear, and were interviewed to determine demographic and pain information. Subjects then underwent a dynamic EMG evaluation for which they were asked to stand, then bend forward as far as possible, stay fully flexed, and return to standing. Lumbar EMG and angle of flexion were recorded during this time. A flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) was computed by comparing maximal EMG while flexing to the average EMG in full flexion. SUBJECTS: Seventy-six persons with chronic musculoskeletal low back pain. RESULTS: Zero-order correlations indicated that pain-related fear was significantly related to reduced lumber flexion (r = -0.55), maximum EMG during flexion (r = -0.38) and extension (r = -0.51), and the FRR (r = -0.40). When controlling for pain and demographic factors, pain-related fear continued to be related to reduced lumbar flexion. Using a path-analytic model to examine whether angle of flexion mediated the relationship between fear and EMG activity, the models examining maximal EMG during flexion and extension supported the notion that pain-related fear influences these measures indirectly through its association with decreased range of motion. Conversely, pain-related fear was independently related to higher average EMG in full flexion, while angle of flexion was not significantly related. Pain-related fear was directly related to a smaller FRR, as well as indirectly through angle of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Pain-related fear is significantly associated with reduced lumbar flexion, greater EMG in full flexion, and a smaller FRR. The relationship between pain-related fear and EMG during flexion and extension appears to be mediated by reduced lumbar flexion. These results suggest that pain-related fear is directly associated with musculoskeletal abnormalities observed among persons with chronic low back pain, as well as indirectly through limited lumbar flexion. These musculoskeletal abnormalities as well as limited movement may be involved in the development and maintenance of chronic low back pain. In addition, changes in musculoskeletal functioning and flexion associated with pain-related fear may warrant greater attention as part of treatment.

Adult↗

[Back pain in children].

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of back pain in children in our country is unknown. Several causes can produce this symptom, but it is necessary to rule out pathologies that require specific treatments. The goal of this work was to study the incidence and the etiology of back pain in children in our country. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present a prospective study done in our Orthopedic Department during a period of 7 months. Twenty-two patients were referred with back pain of at least two months duration. The incidence was 2.9% compared to the total number of patients. The average age ranged from 7 to 17 years. RESULTS: A careful history and a radiological examination diagnosed 50% (11 cases) of the causes of backache in the present study. An idiopathic etiology was the most frequent cause and represented 9 patients (41%). In the remaining 12 cases (59%) pathological causes that required special treatment were identified including 2 cases of Scheuermann disease, 4 cases of painful scoliosis, 3 spondylolysis with spondylolisthesis, 2 cases of discitis, 1 benign neoplasm and 1 psychogenic cause. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend conservative management with the use of medication for relief of pain and physical therapy in the idiopathic cases. In the remaining cases, the specific treatment of the disease can improve the back pain.

Adolescent↗

Endurance training of the trunk extensor muscles in people with subacute low back pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinicians treating patients with low back pain often use exercise to reduce pain and improve function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of trunk extensor endurance training in reducing pain and decreasing disability in subjects with subacute low back pain (ie, onset of back pain within 7 days to 7 weeks). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. A visual analog scale and the pain rating index (PRI) of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) were used to obtain baseline measurements of pain. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used to measure disability, and the Sorensen Test was used to measure trunk extensor endurance. Subjects in the experimental group attended exercise sessions 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Subjects in the control group did not do exercises. Both groups were given back care advice and hot packs for 15 minutes, 3 to 5 times per week. Reassessments were carried out at 3 and 6 weeks. RESULTS: There were differences between the 2 groups at 3 weeks in regard to pain intensity during the evaluation session and pain experienced over the preceding 24 hours, the total MPQ PRI, the sensory component of the MPQ PRI, and the RMDQ. At 6 weeks, no differences were found for pain measurements, disability scores, and holding time on the Sorensen Test. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Trunk extensor endurance training reduced pain and improved function at 3 weeks but resulted in no improvement at 6 weeks when compared with the control group. Endurance exercise is considered to expedite the recovery process for patients with an acute episode of low back pain.

Adult↗

Life events and psychological disturbance in patients with low-back pain.

To elucidate the possible contribution of psychologic factors in the pathogenesis of back pain, an assessment of life events and psychiatric symptoms was undertaken in 80 new referrals. In 57, the back pain had a definite onset recent enough to allow this to be dated accurately; these definite onset cases were divided into 26 in whom a specific organic diagnosis could be made and 31 in whom the cause of the pain was uncertain. An additional 23 patients had chronic pain, or could not date the onset of their symptoms. Unlike previous studies, events that occurred after the onset of back pain and thus could have been a consequence of the back pain were excluded. Before onset of back pain there was a significant excess of adverse life events in those with definite onset back pain of uncertain cause, compared with those with a specific diagnosis: there was no such excess in the periods before referral and attendance at the clinic. Diagnosable psychiatric illness was virtually confined to those with chronic pain. These findings indicate that stress, but not psychiatric illness, is involved in the onset of back pain. Further research is now required to ascertain whether those patients who have many psychiatric symptoms at the time of onset are those who develop chronic pain.

Adult↗

Back pain and health policy research: the what, why, how, who, and when.

STUDY DESIGN: A background literature, supported by discussion and outcomes on the subject of Health Policy and Back Pain, from the Fifth International Forum on Low Back Pain Research in Primary Care, in Montreal in May 2002. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A multitude of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have been completed in the field of back pain research. There has been limited health policy research in the field of back pain but a greater amount of health policy research in other medical fields. METHODS: The focus of the workshop was on the contribution health policy could make in the area of back pain, the methodologies that are appropriate to research in back pain, and the barriers to back pain health policy research. The workshop was supported by the workshop coordinators' literature review. RESULTS: There was consensus about the lack of improved outcomes from randomized controlled trials and individual treatments and general agreement on the importance supporting current research initiatives with health policy research. That policy-makers were developing policy in this area was agreed, and study methodology to support evidence based policy development was explored. CONCLUSIONS: Health policy research is a relatively underdeveloped area of research in back pain. Back pain as a public health problem may be supported by a broader research approach and a collaborative association with policy-makers in this area.

Back Pain↗

The natural history of low back pain in adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN: A 5-year longitudinal interview and questionnaire-based survey of back pain in adolescents. OBJECTIVES: To determine the natural history of back pain during adolescence in boys and girls and to explore the influence of sports participation and lumbar flexibility. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous data on low back pain and flexibility in adolescents have come largely from cross-sectional studies with differing definitions and age groups. A longitudinal study would offer a more detailed description of aspects of the natural history of back pain. METHODS: A cohort of 216 11-year-old children was given a structured questionnaire about back pain. Follow-up evaluation was annual for 4 more years. Lumbar sagittal mobility was measured in first and last years. Life-table analysis was the chosen statistical method. RESULTS: Annual incidence rose from 11.8% at age 12+ to 21.5% at 15+ years. Lifetime prevalence rose from 11.6% at age 11+ to 50.4% at age 15+ years. Experience of back pain was frequently forgotten. Recurrent pain was common, usually manifesting as such rather than as progression from a single episode; few children required treatment. Back pain was more common in boys than girls, especially by age 15 years. There was a positive link between sports and back pain only for boys. Severity and flexibility were not related to sex, treatment, or sport. CONCLUSIONS: Back pain in adolescents is common; it increases with age and is recurrent, but in general does not deteriorate with time. Much of the symptomatology may be considered a normal life experience, probably unrelated to adult disabling trouble.

Adolescent↗

Prognosis of acute low back pain: design of a prospective inception cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines generally portray acute low back pain as a benign and self-limiting condition. However, evidence about the clinical course of acute low back pain is contradictory and the risk of subsequently developing chronic low back pain remains uncertain. There are few high quality prognosis studies and none that have measured pain, disability and return to work over a 12 month period. This study aims to provide the first estimates of the one year prognosis of acute low back pain (pain of less than 2 weeks duration) in patients consulting primary care practitioners. A secondary aim is to identify factors that are associated with the prognosis of low back pain. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a prospective inception cohort study. Consecutive patients consulting general medical practitioners, physiotherapists and chiropractors in the Sydney metropolitan region will complete a baseline questionnaire regarding their back pain. Subsequently these patients will be followed up by telephone 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months after the initial consultation. Patients will be considered to have recovered from the episode of back pain if they have no pain and no limitation of activity, and have returned to pre-injury work status. Life tables will be generated to determine the one year prognosis of acute low back pain. Prognostic factors will be assessed using Cox regression. DISCUSSION: This study will provide the first estimates of the one year prognosis of acute low back pain in a representative sample of primary care patients.

Acute Disease↗

Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients.

The hypothesis of reorganization of the primary somatosensory cortex in states of chronic pain was assessed in 10 low back pain patients and nine matched healthy controls. Intracutaneous electric stimuli were applied to the left back and index finger at a standard, a non-painful and a painful intensity. Magnetic fields were recorded by a 37-channel BTi biomagnetometer from the hemisphere contralateral to the site of stimulation. The power of the early evoked magnetic field (< 100 ms) elicited by painful stimulation of the painful back in very chronic patients was elevated relative to that elicited by painful back stimulation of healthy controls and showed a linear increase with chronicity (r = 0.74). The maximum activity elicited in primary somatosensory cortex was shifted more medially in the very chronic back pain subjects. These data suggest that chronic pain is accompanied by cortical reorganization and may serve an important function in the persistence of the pain experience.

Adult↗

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development.

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale is a new measure of functional disability for patients with back pain. Functional disability was operationalized in terms of perceived difficulty associated with simple physical activities. The content of the scale was developed in several stages, including a literature review, two studies seeking the opinions of patients and experts, pilot testing, and a large, longitudinal study of back pain patients. Forty-eight disability items were extensively studied using standard methods such as test-retest reliability, item-total correlations, and factor analysis, as well as modern techniques based on item response theory. Items that were highly effective in discriminating between different levels of disability were selected for the final, reduced scale. The scale has 20 items, representing six empirically derived categories of activities affected by back pain. Measurement properties of this instrument have been previously discussed.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Bone mineral content, gender, body posture, and build in relation to back pain in middle age.

In 575 55-year-old residents of Malmö, Sweden, the authors studied the interrelationships between back pain and bone mineral content, degree of kyphosis and lordosis, height, and weight, and in women also the age of menarche and menopause, and number of childbirths. Men with back pain tended to be heavier than those without back pain. Back pain was not related to body height nor to degree of kyphosis or lordosis. In women, a positive correlation was found between the degree of kyphosis and lordosis and body weight. Body height in women also was correlated to degree of kyphosis, but not to the degree of lordosis. In men, the authors found no such relationships. Bone mineral content was not related to the occurrence of back pain but to body height and weight in men and in women. Back pain in women was not related to the age at menarche or menopause, nor to the number of children to whom they had given birth.

Back Pain↗