Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling.

Interplay among GATA transcription factors is an important determinant of cell fate during hematopoiesis. Although GATA-2 regulates hematopoietic stem cell function, mechanisms controlling GATA-2 expression are undefined. Of particular interest is the repression of GATA-2, because sustained GATA-2 expression in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells alters hematopoiesis. GATA-2 transcription is derepressed in erythroid precursors lacking GATA-1, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, we show that GATA-1 binds a highly restricted upstream region of the approximately 70-kb GATA-2 domain, despite >80 GATA sites throughout the domain. GATA-2 also binds this region in the absence of GATA-1. Genetic complementation studies in GATA-1-null cells showed that GATA-1 rapidly displaces GATA-2, which is coupled to transcriptional repression. GATA-1 also displaces CREB-binding protein (CBP), despite the fact that GATA-1 binds CBP in other contexts. Repression correlates with reduced histone acetylation domain-wide, but not altered methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4. The GATA factor-binding region exhibited cell-type-specific enhancer activity in transient transfection assays. We propose that GATA-1 instigates GATA-2 repression by means of disruption of positive autoregulation, followed by establishment of a domain-wide repressive chromatin structure. Such a mechanism is predicted to be critical for the control of hematopoiesis.

Animals↗

Specific repression of beta-globin promoter activity by nuclear ferritin.

Developmental hemoglobin switching involves sequential globin gene activations and repressions that are incompletely understood. Earlier observations, described herein, led us to hypothesize that nuclear ferritin is a repressor of the adult beta-globin gene in embryonic erythroid cells. Our data show that a ferritin-family protein in K562 cell nuclear extracts binds specifically to a highly conserved CAGTGC motif in the beta-globin promoter at -153 to -148 bp from the cap site, and mutation of the CAGTGC motif reduces binding 20-fold in competition gel-shift assays. Purified human ferritin that is enriched in ferritin-H chains also binds the CAGTGC promoter segment. Expression clones of ferritin-H markedly repress beta-globin promoter-driven reporter gene expression in cotransfected CV-1 cells in which the beta-promoter has been stimulated with the transcription activator erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF). We have constructed chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter plasmids containing either a wild-type or mutant beta-globin promoter for the -150 CAGTGC motif and have compared the constructs for susceptibility to repression by ferritin-H in cotransfection assays. We find that stimulation by cotransfected EKLF is retained with the mutant promoter, whereas repression by ferritin-H is lost. Thus, mutation of the -150 CAGTGC motif not only markedly reduces in vitro binding of nuclear ferritin but also abrogates the ability of expressed ferritin-H to repress this promoter in our cell transfection assay, providing a strong link between DNA binding and function, and strong support for our proposal that nuclear ferritin-H is a repressor of the human beta-globin gene. Such a repressor could be helpful in treating sickle cell and other genetic diseases.

Animals↗

Transcriptional repression of the neu protooncogene by the adenovirus 5 E1A gene products.

Amplification/overexpression of the human neu protooncogene has been frequently found in human primary breast and ovarian cancers and is correlated with the number of axillary lymph nodes positive for metastasis in breast cancer patients. Identification of the factors controlling transcription of the neu gene is essential for understanding the mechanisms of neu gene regulation and its role in tumorigenicity. The adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) gene products are pleiotropic transcription regulators of viral and cellular genes and have been identified as a viral suppressor gene for metastasis. Here we demonstrate that transcription of neu can be strongly repressed by the E1A gene products. The 13S and 12S products of E1A gene are effective at repressing neu transcription and the transcriptional repression requires the conserved region 2 of the E1A proteins. The target for E1A repression was localized within a 139-base-pair DNA fragment in the upstream region of the neu promoter. In addition, competition experiments suggest that the sequence TGGAATG, within the 139-base-pair fragment, is an important element for the E1A-induced repression. These results indicate that E1A negatively regulates neu gene expression at the transcriptional level by means of a specific DNA element.

Adenovirus Early Proteins↗

Krüppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional repression domains.

The Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) is a highly conserved, 75-aa region containing two predicted amphipathic alpha-helices. The KRAB domain is present in the amino-terminal regions of more than one-third of all Krüppel-class Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins and is conserved from yeast to man; however, its function is unknown. Here it is shown that the KRAB domain functions as a DNA binding-dependent transcriptional repressor when fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain from the yeast GAL4 protein. A 45-aa segment containing one of the predicted KRAB amphipathic helices was necessary and sufficient for repression. Amino acid substitutions in the predicted helix abolished the repression function. These results assign a function, transcriptional repression, to the highly conserved KRAB box and define a minimal repression domain which may aid in identifying mechanisms of repression.

3T3 Cells↗

11q23 translocations split the "AT-hook" cruciform DNA-binding region and the transcriptional repression domain from the activation domain of the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene.

Translocations involving chromosome band 11q23, found in acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias, disrupt the MLL gene. This gene encodes a putative transcription factor with homology to the zinc fingers and other domains of the Drosophila trithorax gene product and to the "AT-hook" motif of high mobility group proteins. To map potential transcriptional activation or repression domains of the MLL protein, yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and MLL hybrid protein-expressing plasmids were cotransfected with chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter plasmids in a transient transfection system. We found that MLL contains a strong activation domain and a repression domain. The former, located telomeric (3') to the breakpoint region, activated transcription 18-fold to > 200-fold, depending on the promoter and cell line used for transfection. A repression domain that repressed transcription 4-fold was located centromeric (5') to the breakpoint region of MLL. The MLL AT-hook domain protein was expressed in bacteria and was utilized in a gel mobility shift assay to assess DNA-binding activity. The MLL AT-hook domain could bind cruciform DNA, recognizing structure rather than sequence of the target DNA. In translocations involving MLL, loss of an activation domain with retention of a repression domain and a DNA-binding domain on the der(11) chromosome could alter the expression of downstream target genes, suggesting a potential mechanism of action for MLL in leukemia.

Animals↗

Identification of essential nucleotides in an upstream repressing sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by selection for increased expression of TRK2.

The TRK2 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a membrane protein involved in potassium transport and is expressed at extremely low levels. Dominant cis-acting mutations (TRK2D), selected by their ability to confer TRK2-dependent growth on low-potassium medium, identified an upstream repressor element (URS1-TRK2) in the TRK2 promoter. The URS1-TRK2 sequence (5'-AGCCGCACG-3') shares six nucleotides with the ubiquitous URS1 element (5'-AGCCGCCGA-3'), and the protein species binding URS1-CAR1 (URSF) is capable of binding URS1-TRK2 in vitro. Sequence analysis of 17 independent repression-defective TRK2D mutations identified three adjacent nucleotides essential for URS1-mediated repression in vivo. Our results suggest a role for context effects with regard to URS1-related sequences: several mutant alleles of the URS1 element previously reported to have little or no effect when analyzed within the context of a heterologous promoter (CYC1) [Luche, R.M., Sumrada, R. & Cooper, T.G. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 3884-3895] have major effects on repression in the context of their native promoters (TRK2 and CAR1). TRK2D mutations that abolish repression also reveal upstream activating sequence activity either within or adjacent to URS1. Additivity between TRK2D and sin3 delta mutations suggest that SIN3-mediated repression is independent of that mediated by URS1.

Alleles↗

Androgen-repressed phenotype in human prostate cancer.

An androgen-repressed human prostate cancer cell line, ARCaP, was established and characterized. This cell line was derived from the ascites fluid of a patient with advanced metastatic disease. In contrast to the behavior of androgen-dependent LNCaP and its androgen-independent C4-2 subline, androgen and estrogen suppress the growth of ARCaP cells in a dose-dependent manner in vivo and in vitro. ARCaP is tumorigenic and highly metastatic. It metastasizes to the lymph node, lung, pancreas, liver, kidney, and bone, and forms ascites fluid in athymic hosts. ARCaP cells express low levels of androgen receptor mRNA and prostate-specific antigen mRNA and protein. Immunohistochemical staining shows that ARCaP cells stain intensely for epidermal growth factor receptor, c-erb B2/neu, and c-erb B3. Staining is negative for chromogranin A and positive for bombesin, serotonin, neuron-specific enolase, and the c-met protooncogene (a hepatic growth factor/scatter factor receptor). ARCaP cells also secrete high levels of gelatinase A and B and some stromelysin, which suggests that this cell line may contain markers representing invasive adenocarcinoma with selective neuronendocrine phenotypes. Along with its repression of growth, androgen is also found to repress the expression of prostate-specific antigen in ARCaP cells as detected by a prostate-specific antigen promoter-beta-galactosidase reporter assay. Our results suggest that the androgen-repressed state may be central to prostate cancer progression and that advanced prostate cancer can progress from an androgen-independent to an androgen-repressed state.

Aged↗

A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression.

In a previous study we showed that the murine homeodomain protein Msx-1 is a potent transcriptional repressor and that this activity is independent of its DNA binding function. The implication of these findings is that repression by Msx-1 is mediated through its association with certain protein factors rather than through its interaction with DNA recognition sites, which prompted investigation of the relevant protein factors. Here we show that Msx-1 interacts directly with the TATA binding protein (TBP) but not with several other general transcription factors. This interaction is mediated by the Msx-1 homeodomain, specifically through residues in the N-terminal arm. These same N-terminal arm residues are required for repression by Msx-1, suggesting a functional relationship between TBP association and transcriptional repression. This is further supported by the observation that addition of excess TBP blocks the repressor action of Msx-1 in in vitro transcription assays. Finally, DNA binding activity is separable from both TBP interaction and repression, which further shows that these other activities of the Msx-1 homeodomain are distinct. Therefore, these findings define a role for the Msx-1 homeodomain, particularly the N-terminal arm residues in protein-protein interaction and transcriptional repression, and implicate a more complex role overall for homeodomains in transcriptional regulation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Concerted repression of an immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer, 3' alpha E(hs1,2).

The transcription factor, B-cell-specific activator protein (BSAP), represses the murine immunoglobulin heavy-chain 3' enhancer 3' alpha E(hs1,2) in B cells. Analysis of various 3'alpha E deletional constructs indicates that sequences flanking a and b BSAP-binding sites are essential for appropriate regulation of the enhancer. An octamer motif 5' of the a site and a specific G-rich motif 3' of the b site were identified by competition in electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and methylation-interference foot-printing analysis. Site-directed mutagenesis of either the octamer or G-rich sites resulted in the complete release of repression of 3' alpha E(hs1,2), implicating these two motifs in the repression of this enhancer in B cells. However, when both BSAP-binding sites were mutated, the octamer and G-rich motifs functioned as activators. Moreover, in plasma cells, when BSAP is not expressed, 3' alpha E(hs1,2) is active, and its activity depends on the presence of the other two factors. These results suggest that in B cells, 3' alpha E (hs1,2) is down-regulated by the concerted actions of BSAP, octamer, and G-rich DNA-binding proteins. Supporting this notion of concerted repression, a physical interaction between BSAP and octamer-binding proteins was demonstrated using glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins. Thus, concerted repression of 3' alpha E (hs1,2) in B cells provides a sensitive mechanism by which this enhancer, either individually or as part of a locus-controlling region, is highly responsive to any of several participating factors.

Animals↗

Copper-mediated repression of the activation domain in the yeast Mac1p transcription factor.

The expression of a number of genes encoding products involved in copper ion uptake in yeast is specifically inhibited by copper ions. We show here that copper metalloregulation occurs through Cu-dependent repression of the transactivation activity of Mac1p. A segment of the yeast transcription factor Mac1p was identified that activated transcription in vivo in a heterologous system using fusion polypeptides with the yeast Gal4 DNA-binding domain. The Gal4/Mac1p hybrid exhibits transactivation activity that is repressed in cells cultured in the presence of copper salts and derepressed in cells with reduced copper uptake. The repressive effect is specific for copper ions. The concentration dependency of the Cu-inactivation of Gal4/Mac1p is similar to that of Cu-inhibition of CTR1 expression, a known Cu-regulated gene in vivo. Copper inhibition of gene expression is not observed with a Gal4/Mac1p chimera containing the MAC1(up1) substitution within the transactivation domain. Cells harboring the MAC1(up1) allele fail to attenuate FRE1 and CTR1 expression in a Cu-dependent manner. Additional MAC1(up) alleles exist within the first of two cysteine-rich sequence motifs adjacent to the His --> Gln MAC1(up1) encoded substitution. Thus, Cu-regulation of Mac1p function arises from a novel Cu-specific repression of the transactivation domain function. Models for the mechanism of Cu-repression of Mac1p function will be discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Direct repeat sequences in the Streptomyces chitinase-63 promoter direct both glucose repression and chitin induction.

The chi63 promoter directs glucose-sensitive, chitin-dependent transcription of a gene involved in the utilization of chitin as carbon source. Analysis of 5' and 3' deletions of the promoter region revealed that a 350-bp segment is sufficient for wild-type levels of expression and regulation. The analysis of single base changes throughout the promoter region, introduced by random and site-directed mutagenesis, identified several sequences to be important for activity and regulation. Single base changes at -10, -12, -32, -33, -35, and -37 upstream of the transcription start site resulted in loss of activity from the promoter, suggesting that bases in these positions are important for RNA polymerase interaction. The sequences centered around -10 (TATTCT) and -35 (TTGACC) in this promoter are, in fact, prototypical of eubacterial promoters. Overlapping the RNA polymerase binding site is a perfect 12-bp direct repeat sequence. Some base changes within this direct repeat resulted in constitutive expression, suggesting that this sequence is an operator for negative regulation. Other base changes resulted in loss of glucose repression while retaining the requirement for chitin induction, suggesting that this sequence is also involved in glucose repression. The fact that cis-acting mutations resulted in glucose resistance but not inducer independence rules out the possibility that glucose repression acts exclusively by inducer exclusion. The fact that mutations that affect glucose repression and chitin induction fall within the same direct repeat sequence module suggests that the direct repeat sequence facilitates both chitin induction and glucose repression.

Base Sequence↗

The three members of the pocket proteins family share the ability to repress E2F activity through recruitment of a histone deacetylase.

The transcription factor E2F plays a major role in cell cycle control in mammalian cells. E2F binding sites, which are present in the promoters of a variety of genes required for S phase, shift from a negative to a positive role in transcription at the commitment point, a crucial point in G1 that precedes the G1/S transition. Before the commitment point, E2F activity is repressed by members of the pocket proteins family. This repression is believed to be crucial for the proper control of cell growth. We have previously shown that Rb, the founding member of the pocket proteins family, represses E2F1 activity by recruiting the histone deacetylase HDAC1. Here, we show that the two other members of the pocket proteins family, p107 and p130, also are able to interact physically with HDAC1 in live cells. HDAC1 interacts with p107 and Rb through an "LXCXE"-like motif, similar to that used by viral transforming proteins to bind and inactivate pocket proteins. Indeed, we find that the viral transforming protein E1A competes with HDAC1 for p107 interaction. We also demonstrate that p107 is able to interact simultaneously with HDAC1 and E2F4, suggesting a model in which p107 recruits HDAC1 to repress E2F sites. Indeed, we demonstrate that histone deacetylase activity is involved in the p107- or p130-induced repression of E2F4. Taken together, our data suggest that all members of the E2F family are regulated in early G1 by similar complexes, containing a pocket protein and the histone deacetylase HDAC1.

Carrier Proteins↗

DNA methylation in transcriptional repression of two differentially expressed X-linked genes, GPC3 and SYBL1.

Methylation of CpG islands is an established transcriptional repressive mechanism and is a feature of silencing in X chromosome inactivation. Housekeeping genes that are subject to X inactivation exhibit differential methylation of their CpG islands such that the inactive alleles are hypermethylated. In this report, we examine two contrasting X-linked genes with CpG islands for regulation by DNA methylation: SYBL1, a housekeeping gene in the Xq pseudoautosomal region, and GPC3, a tissue-specific gene in Xq26 that is implicated in the etiology of the Simpson-Golabi-Behmel overgrowth syndrome. We observed that in vitro methylation of either the SYBL1 or the GPC3 promoter resulted in repression of reporter constructs. In normal contexts, we found that both the Y and inactive X alleles of SYBL1 are repressed and hypermethylated, whereas the active X allele is expressed and unmethylated. Furthermore, the Y and inactive X alleles of SYBL1 were derepressed by treatment with the demethylating agent azadeoxycytidine. GPC3 is also subject to X inactivation, and the active X allele is unmethylated in nonexpressing leukocytes as well as in an expressing cell line, suggesting that methylation is not involved in the tissue-specific repression of this allele. The inactive X allele, however, is hypermethylated in leukocytes, presumably reflecting early X inactivation events that become important for gene dosage in expressing lineages. These and other data suggest that all CpG islands on Xq, including the pseudoautosomal region, are subject to X inactivation-induced methylation. Additionally, methylation of SYBL1 on Yq may derive from a process related to X inactivation that targets large chromatin domains for transcriptional repression.

Aza Compounds↗

Neural restrictive silencer factor recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase complex to repress neuron-specific target genes.

Accumulative evidence suggests that more than 20 neuron-specific genes are regulated by a transcriptional cis-regulatory element known as the neural restrictive silencer (NRS). A trans-acting repressor that binds the NRS, NRSF [also designated RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST)] has been cloned, but the mechanism by which it represses transcription is unknown. Here we show evidence that NRSF represses transcription of its target genes by recruiting mSin3 and histone deacetylase. Transfection experiments using a series of NRSF deletion constructs revealed the presence of two repression domains, RD-1 and RD-2, within the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively. A yeast two-hybrid screen using the RD-1 region as a bait identified a short form of mSin3B. In vitro pull-down assays and in vivo immunoprecipitation-Western analyses revealed a specific interaction between NRSF-RD1 and mSin3 PAH1-PAH2 domains. Furthermore, NRSF and mSin3 formed a complex with histone deacetylase 1, suggesting that NRSF-mediated repression involves histone deacetylation. When the deacetylation of histones was inhibited by tricostatin A in non-neuronal cells, mRNAs encoding several neuronal-specific genes such as SCG10, NMDAR1, and choline acetyltransferase became detectable. These results indicate that NRSF recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase 1 to silence neural-specific genes and suggest further that repression of histone deacetylation is crucial for transcriptional activation of neural-specific genes during neuronal terminal differentiation.

3T3 Cells↗

The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product represses transcription when directly bound to the promoter.

Rb represses E2F-mediated transcription in part by blocking the trans-activation domain of E2F. In addition, Rb can convert an E2F binding site from a positive to a negative element. To examine the effect of a Rb-DNA-bound complex on transcription, full-length Rb was fused to the DNA binding domain of GAL4. Here, we report that GAL4-Rb can repress transcription mediated by either Sp1, AP-1, or p53, dependent upon the presence of both the GAL4 DNA binding domain and GAL4 binding sites. Moreover, GAL4-Rb inhibited the activity of the herpes simplex virus tk promoter from GAL4 binding sites located at a distance from the promoter. In contrast, GAL4-Rb was unable to repress basal transcription. Cotransfection of specific cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases or SV40 T-antigen abolished the repressive activity of GAL4-Rb. The domains of Rb involved in mediating the repression of transcription were mapped to regions that are overlapping, but not identical, to those required for the interaction with E2F. We propose that Rb can function as a general repressor of transcription when bound to the promoter region.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗

Transcriptional repression of p53 by human T-cell leukemia virus type I Tax protein.

The human T-cell leukemia virus type I oncoprotein Tax transcriptionally deregulates a wide variety of viral and cellular genes. Tax deregulation of gene expression is mediated through interaction with a variety of structurally unrelated cellular transcription factors, as Tax does not bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner. Although most of these cellular transcription factors have been shown to mediate activation by Tax, we have recently demonstrated that members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors, which play a critical role in progression through the cell cycle, mediate repression by Tax. In this report, we examined whether Tax might repress transcription of the tumor suppressor p53, as the p53 gene has recently been demonstrated to be regulated by the bHLH protein c-Myc. Furthermore, loss or inactivation of the p53 gene has been shown to be causally associated with oncogenic transformation. We show that Tax represses transcription of the p53 gene and that this repression is dependent upon the bHLH recognition element in the p53 promoter. Together, these results suggest that Tax may promote malignant transformation through repression of p53 transcription.

Cell Line↗

The human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtype NUC1 represses the activation of hPPAR alpha and thyroid hormone receptors.

We have cloned two human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes, hPPAR alpha and hNUC1. hPPAR alpha is activated by clofibric acid and other PPAR activators. hNUC1 is not activated by these compounds acting instead as a repressor of hPPAR alpha and human thyroid hormone receptor transcriptional activation. Repression is specific since hNUC1 does not significantly repress activation by the progesterone or retinoic acid receptors. We demonstrate co-operative binding of hNUC1 and hRXR alpha to a PPAR-responsive element and show that in the presence of hRXR alpha, the affinity of hNUC1 for the peroxisome proliferator is comparable to that of hPPAR alpha. Furthermore, repression of hPPAR alpha can be overcome by transfecting excess hPPAR alpha. We propose that hNUC1 represses the activity of hPPAR alpha by titrating out a factor required for activation. Our data further suggests convergence of thyroid hormone- and peroxisome-mediated fatty acid metabolism pathways. Overcoming hNUC1 repression could be a means of increasing the activity of these receptors.

Cell Line↗

p53 is a mediator for radiation-repressed human TR2 orphan receptor expression in MCF-7 cells, a new pathway from tumor suppressor to member of the steroid receptor superfamily.

p53 may function as a checkpoint by arresting the G1 cell cycle in response to DNA damage induced by radiation or other stimuli. We have found that the expression of the TR2 orphan receptor (TR2), a member of the steroid receptor superfamily, was down-regulated by ionizing irradiation. Our data shown in the present study demonstrate that irradiation can repress TR2 at both the translational and transcriptional levels. Transient transfection assays further link p53 to this repression by proving that endogenously induced or exogenously transfected p53 can repress TR2 gene expression, and this repression can be reversed by the co-transfection of SV40 large T antigen. Together, our data demonstrate for the first time that radiation and p53 can repress TR2, possibly providing a new pathway to link ionizing irradiation and p53 to members of the steroid receptor superfamily.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗