Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Myopia”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

Direct objective quantification of corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to measure regional distribution differences in corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. METHODS: The authors developed computerized gradient edge detectors with which were analyzed digitized anterior slit-lamp photographs of 40 eyes, an average of 21.0 plus or minus 14.5 weeks after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia (-6 to -22 diopters). A treated area an adjacent untreated area on the anterior corneal surface, each containing six regions, were quantified, and the difference was correlated with various parameters. RESULTS: Mean differences between scarred and clear areas for haze grade 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 were 16.9, 26.6, 42.6, 60.4, and 76.4 gray levels, respectively (rs = 0.96; P = 0.0001). A low but statistically significant correlation between the intended correction and postoperative corneal haze was found (r = 0.33; P = 0.037). The mean coefficient of variation of the amount of opacification within each treated area was 9.4%. This coefficient of variation increased with a longer follow-up time (r = 0.88; P = 0.0001). The difference in the intensity of haze between the center and more peripheral regions over the entrance pupil did not correlate with the attempted correction. However, a strong association between a relatively less severe central corneal haze with respect to more peripheral haze and longer follow-up time was found (r = -0.96; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The amount of corneal haze showed a weak positive association with the attempted correction in excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. Corneal haze appeared fairly uniformly distributed within the ablation zone, but a more heterogeneous distribution was found with a longer follow-up time. Furthermore, later postoperative examinations disclosed a clear trend toward diminishing central opacification relative to peripheral regions over the entrance pupil.

Adult↗

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia: four-year experience with a multiple zone technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the results of the authors' 4-year experience with excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and multiple optical zone corneal ablation in highly myopic eyes. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated 56 eyes of 44 patients (mean refraction, -11.3 diopters [D]; range, -5.75 to -24.5 D) who underwent PRK with a Visx Model 20/20 laser (Visx, Santa Clara, CA). Preoperative visual acuity of 20/40 or better was present in 46 eyes. Corneal ablation was divided into concentric optical zones (4, 5, and 6 mm), allowing corrections of up to 18 D, with a refractive goal of within -1 D from emmetropia in 49 eyes. A hand-held fixation system was always used, and a nitrogen-blowing system (NBS) was used in the first 21 eyes only. RESULTS: Before retreatment, the range of final cycloplegic refraction from emmetropia in eyes treated with NBS versus not was within +/-1 D in 6 (28.6%) and 15 eyes (44.1%), between -1.25 and -3 D in 5 (23.8%) and 14 eyes (41.1%), and more than -3 D in 10 (47.6%) and 5 eyes (14.7%), respectively. No lines of visual acuity were lost in 37 eyes (80.4%) with 20/40 or better visual acuity before surgery. Three eyes showed vision loss due to worsening of myopic maculopathy and one due to corneal haze. Correction stabilized within 9 months, and at a mean time of 25.6 months, the correction attained was of -8.5 +/- 3.6 D, achieving 90.3% of attempted correction. Eyes with preoperative myopia less than -10 D (n = 27) showed regression less than -1 D in 8 eyes (29.6%), between -1.25 and -3.00 D in 5 eyes (18.5%), and greater than -3.00 D in 1 eye (3.7%); eyes with more than -10 D (n = 29) regressed in 3 (10.3%), 6 (20.7%), and 1 eye (3.4%), respectively. Severe haze was observed in 11 eyes (19.6%) 3 months after surgery. Two eyes showed decentration greater than 1.5 mm. At last examination, night driving problems were reported by 12 (41.4%) of 29 patients evaluated who drive. CONCLUSIONS: After the NBS was eliminated, the multiple-zone technique achieved a long-term, stable 83.1% reduction of preoperative myopia. Patients with severe myopia appreciated reduction of most of the refractive defect, although perception of halos was noted by 16 patients.

Adult↗

The intrastromal corneal ring segments. Phase II results for the correction of myopia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) for the correction of myopia. DESIGN: A 2-year phase II clinical trial of ICRS was initiated in May 1995. The investigational plan specifies that 150 patients with sighted eyes, requiring myopic corrections from -1.00 to -6.00 diopters (D), will each receive ICRS in 1 eye. The patient population will be divided into approximately five patients per ICRS thickness (0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, and 0.45 mm) per site. Six investigational sites are participating in the trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine men and 43 women requiring myopic corrections were enrolled at four U.S. investigational sites. These 102 patients each received the ICRS product in 1 eye. INTERVENTION: Correction of myopia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy of ICRS was assessed with respect to the trial endpoints of predictability of refractive effect, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), stability of UCVA, maintenance of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and stability of refractive effect. RESULTS: As shown by the available month-3 data (99 patients; all device thicknesses), 95 (96%) of 99 patients had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ninety-eight (99%) of 99 patients were within 2 lines of their preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. The average change (with standard error) in cycloplegic refraction (spherical equivalent) achieved by ICRS thickness was -1.27 +/- 0.09 D (0.25 mm), -2.13 +/- 0.16 D (0.30 mm), -2.56 +/- 0.15 D (0.35 mm), -3.77 +/- 0.37 D (0.40 mm) and -4.16 +/- 0.24 D (0.45 mm). Seventy-seven percent (76/99) of the patients were within +/-1.00 D of their intended correction. When the ICRS was removed in two cases, both patients returned to within 0.75 D of their preoperative manifest refraction. CONCLUSIONS: The ICRS appears to be a viable and effective alternative for the treatment of myopia. Additionally, as indicated by the explant data, the ICRS's refractive effect may be reversible upon removal of the device.

Adult↗

Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Correlation with pretreatment myopia.

PURPOSE: The authors relate the observed reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) after excimer laser treatment to the degree of myopia treated. BACKGROUND: Intraocular pressure, measured by both Goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometry, has been reported to decrease after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). However, IOP readings after excimer laser PRK might be inaccurate as a consequence of changes in both the thickness and curvature of the cornea. METHODS: Baseline IOP readings were measured by noncontact tonometry in each eye of a group of 1320 patients at the time of their initial consultation. These were compared to readings obtained before treatment of the second eye, which took place a minimum of 4 months later. The untreated eyes served as controls. The paired Student's t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After PRK, a decrease was observed in the IOP of treated eyes that was related to the degree of myopia treated. A significant difference was observed between treated and untreated eyes (P < 0.0000). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP measured after PRK for myopia may be reduced because of changes in corneal thickness (absence of Bowman's membrane and central thinning) and topography. This is of particular relevance when monitoring the IOP of those patients who are given steroid drops to prevent regression. It also may be of importance in the management of any future glaucoma.

Adult↗

Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness, safety, and stability of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low-to-moderate myopia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, bilateral study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three patients with a manifest refraction of -2.50 to -8.00 diopters (D) participated. INTERVENTION: For each patient, one eye received LASIK and the other received PRK. The first eye treated, and surgical method in the first eye, were randomized. Both eyes were treated by the same surgeon during the same operative session with a Summit Omnimed I laser (6-mm-diameter ablation) and a Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper. Follow-up was 90% at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: At baseline, mean (+/-standard deviation) spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -4.80 +/- 1.60 D in LASIK-treated eyes and -4.70 +/- 1.50 D in PRK-treated eyes. At 1 day after surgery, 81% of patients (21 eyes) reported no pain in the LASIK-treated eye, whereas no patient (0%) reported being pain-free in the PRK-treated eye. At 3 to 4 days after surgery, 18 (80%) LASIK-treated eyes either improved or remained within 1 line of baseline spectacle-corrected visual acuity; only 10 (45%) PRK-treated eyes achieved this result. At 2 years after surgery, 18 (61%) LASIK- and 10 (36%) PRK-treated eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, with no statistically significant difference in refractive outcome between the two techniques. Quantitative videokeratography showed more regularity after LASIK. Complications were similar in the two groups. Patients preferred LASIK by a margin of 2 to 1 at 1 year but showed no preference at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using a 6-mm-diameter single-pass, large area ablation and an automated microkeratome to treat myopia of -2.50 to -8.00 D with 1.00 D or less astigmatism in 1994, the authors used LASIK to produce a higher percentage of eyes with an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, more regular postoperative corneal topography, less postoperative pain, and more rapid recovery of baseline spectacle-corrected visual acuity than PRK. Both LASIK and PRK achieved successful correction of low-to-moderate myopia at 1 and 2 years after surgery.

Adolescent↗

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for visual rehabilitation of residual myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: LASIK was performed on 23 eyes of 22 patients unable to wear glasses or contact lenses after penetrating keratoplasty due to anisometropia, high astigmatism, and/or contact lens-intolerance. METHODS: All patients underwent LASIK for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty. Uncorrected visual acuity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, degree of anisometropia, and corneal transplant integrity were recorded before surgery, as well as at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after LASIK surgery. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent before surgery was -7.58+/-4.42 diopters (D), which was reduced to -1.09+/-2.01 D, -0.79+/-1.84 D, -0.77+/-1.25 D, and -1.57+/-1.20 D, respectively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after LASIK. The mean cylinder before surgery was 3.64+/-1.72 D, which was reduced to 1.98+/-1.15 D, 1.64+/-1.14 D, 1.48+/-0.92 D, and 1.29+/-1.04 D, respectively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after LASIK. Spherical equivalent anisometropia was reduced from a mean of 6.88+/-4.4 D to 1.42+/-1.05 D at the final examination. Best-corrected visual acuity remained the same or improved in 21 of 23 eyes and decreased by 1 and 3 lines in 2 patients. There were no surgical flap or corneal transplant complications. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is a viable treatment alternative for myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty in patients who are contact lens-intolerant. LASIK is more effective in treating myopia than astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Adult↗

[Treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia with photodynamic therapy: outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual outcome of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) caused by pathologic myopia. METHODS: Retrospective and noncomparative analysis of 42 patients with CNV secondary to pathologic myopia recruited between September 2001 and 2003, who were treated with a standard regimen of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were followed up for 12 months; 15 out of 42 completed 24 months of follow-up. Initial visual acuity ranged from 1/10 to 5/10 with a mean of 1.6/10. Twenty-five (56.7%) eyes had stable or improved visual acuity at 12 months with a mean of 2.5/10. In the group of patients who completed 24 months of follow-up, six eyes (39.9%) had stable or improved visual acuity with a mean of 1.6/10 at 1 year and 1.25/10 at 2 years. The average photodynamic therapy treatment required in 1 and 2 years were 1.5 and 2.1, respectively, and they are less than those reported by the Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) study. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization caused by pathologic myopia maintained a visual benefit at 1 and 2 years.

Adult↗

Intraocular lens power calculations in patients with extreme myopia.

PURPOSE: To determine the variables that might contribute to improved intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations preoperatively in cataract patients with extreme myopia. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients with extreme myopia and axial lengths longer than 27.0 mm. All patients had clear corneal phacoemulsification by the same surgeon and implantation of the Domilens SiFlex 1 IOL (power range -6.0 to +5.0 diopters [D]). The performances of the SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 formulas in predicting an IOL power that would meet the target refraction of +/-1.00 D were compared. RESULTS: The formulas tended to suggest underpowered IOLs, more severe in eyes with axial lengths greater than 30.00 mm. These eyes accounted for most of the minus-power IOLs implanted. Back calculations of axial lengths in patients with minus-power IOLs showed that, on average, emmetropia could have been predicted by choosing shorter axial lengths (up to 2.72 mm shorter) than those used in the original IOL power calculations. Preoperative B-scan ultrasonography demonstrated the presence of a posterior pole staphyloma temporal to the optic nerve in several patients who required minus-power IOLs, which suggests that axial length measurement problems were a major source of IOL calculation errors in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with axial lengths longer than or equal to 27.0 mm, current third- and fourth-generation lens calculation formulas have a tendency to over minus patients between -1.0 and -4.0 D. The formulas appear to perform better for plus-power IOL implantation than for minus-power IOL implantation. The use of B-scan ultrasonography to locate posterior pole staphylomas may improve the accuracy of IOL calculations in eyes with extreme myopia.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct residual myopia and astigmatism after radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in selected post-radial-keratotomy (RK) eyes with residual myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: TLC-The Brea Laser Eye Center, Brea, California, USA. METHODS: Nine eyes of 6 patients who had had RK but had residual myopia and/or astigmatism had LASIK. All RK eyes had 8 radial incisions, were more than 1 year post-RK, had no epithelial inclusion cysts or corneal disease, and had had no subsequent ocular surgery. Follow-up was a minimum of 13 months, at which time uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, cycloplegic refraction, keratometry, central and peripheral pachymetries, intraocular pressure, and a subjective assessment of visual function were obtained. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.156 diopter (D) +/- 0.174 (SD). All eyes treated for distance vision had a UCVA of 20/25 or better. No patient lost BCVA. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Seven eyes had morning and evening measurements. The mean change in manifest SE from morning to evening was -0.143 D. Six of the 7 eyes (86%) had 0 to 1 Snellen line change in UCVA from morning to evening. The subjective questionnaire revealed a high degree of satisfaction with overall vision, minimal glare, and less fluctuation in daily vision than before LASIK. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis is safe and efficacious for reducing residual myopia and astigmatism in properly selected RK patients.

Astigmatism↗

Surgical correction of severe myopia with an angle-supported phakic intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of a fourth-generation angle-supported anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with severe myopia. SETTING: Refractive Surgery and Cornea Unit, Alicante Institute of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernández University School of Medicine, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: In this prospective study, 23 eyes (16 patients) with a mean preoperative myopia of -19.56 diopters (D) +/- 1.76 (SD) (range -16.75 to -23.25 D) were implanted with the ZSAL-4 phakic IOL. Basic examinations were performed before and after surgery in all patients. Eighteen eyes were also studied by clinical specular microscopy, and the endothelium was analyzed for cell density, coefficient of variation in cell size, and hexagonality. The location of the IOL in the anterior chamber was evaluated in 10 eyes by A-scan biometry. To evaluate haptic geometry, a theoretical mechanical model was used. The follow-up was 24 months in all patients. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 13 eyes (56.0%) 12 months after surgery and in 14 eyes (60.8%) at 24 months. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved 0.19 at 12 and 24 months (0.1 = 1 line) from preoperative values. The efficacy index was 1.12 at 24 months and the safety index, 1.45. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.65 +/- 0.65 D at 24 months. The postoperative spherical equivalent was within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia in 19 eyes (82.6%) at 12 and 24 months. The mean endothelial cell loss was 3.50% at 12 months and 4.18% at 24 months. The coefficient of variation in cell size decreased from 0.34 before surgery to 0.28 at 24 months after surgery. The IOL was located 0.79 +/- 0.24 mm in front of the crystalline lens. Postoperative complications included night halos in 6 eyes (26.1%) at 12 and 24 months and pupil ovalization in 4 eyes (17.4%). Intraocular lens rotation was observed in 10 eyes (43.5%) at 24 months. Two eyes (8. 7%) developed a slight inflammatory response during the first 6 months. Our mechanical model predicted that the compression forces against the angle structures were greater at the first footplate than at the second. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the ZSAL-4 IOL in the anterior chamber of phakic eyes was effective and predictable in correcting severe myopia. However, the ZSAL-4 did not prevent pupil ovalization, IOL rotation, or low-grade postoperative uveitis. Improvements in haptic design following our mechanical model could decrease these haptic-related complications.

Adult↗

Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual outcome, stability, and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for residual myopia after radial keratotomy (RK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital, Chennai, India. METHODS: Twenty eyes that had LASIK treatment for residual myopia after RK (10 eyes) or PRK (10 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed after a mean period of 24.3 months +/- 0.75 (SD) in the RK group and 22.0 +/- 1.07 months in the PRK group. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean spherical equivalent was reduced from -6.05 +/- 1.98 diopters (D) to -1.26 +/- 0.32 D (P <.05) in the RK group and from -3.38 +/- 1.30 D to -0.55 +/- 0.40 D (P <.005) in the PRK group. The mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/300 (range 20/600 to 20/200) to 20/40 (range 20/60 to 20/20) (P <.05) and from 20/200 (range 20/800 to 20/80) to 20/25 (range 20/40 to 20/20) (P <.05), respectively. Two eyes in the RK group and 3 in the PRK group gained 1 line of best corrected visual acuity, and 2 eyes in the RK group lost 1 line. No sight-threatening complications such as a free flap, corneal ectasia, or a retinal complication occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in corneal haze before and after LASIK. Two eyes in the RK group required repositioning of the flap because of irregular apposition to the stromal bed. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis was safe, effective, and stable in the treatment of residual myopia after RK and PRK.

Adult↗

Implantable contact lens for high myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and biocompatibility of a collagen polymer implantable contact lens (ICL) (Staar Collamer) as a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (IOL) to correct high myopia. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. METHODS: A Staar Collamer posterior chamber phakic IOL was implanted in 38 eyes of 22 patients with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54 years). The mean preoperative myopia was -15.10 diopters (D) (range -7.75 to -29.00 D). Surgical implantation was performed through a 3.0 mm clear corneal sutureless incision using paraocular anesthesia. The patients were followed clinically up to 3 years. The mean follow-up was 13.6 months (range 6 to 24 months) for refractive data and 22.3 months (range 6 to 35 months) for complications. The possible inflammatory response to the ICL was measured using a laser flare meter in 12 eyes. RESULTS: Postoperatively, all eyes had a significant increase in uncorrected visual acuity, allowing all but 3 patients (5 eyes) to manage most activities without spectacles. The mean spherical equivalent refraction at the last examination was -2.00 D +/- 2.48 (SD) (range +0.13 to -13.00 D), within +/-1.00 D of the targeted refraction in 31 eyes (81.6%) and within +/-0.50 D in 27 eyes (71.1%). In eyes in which the preoperative myopia was less than -18.00 D (n = 28), the achieved refraction was within +/-1.00 D of the intended refraction in 27 eyes (96.4%) and within +/-0.50 D in 24 eyes (85.7%). The refraction remained stable with a statistically insignificant change (P >.05) at each interval during the follow-up. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by 1 or more lines in 23 of 32 eyes (71.9%) at 1 year. Two eyes (6.3%) lost 1 line of BCVA. Laser flare photometry showed normal aqueous flare values (11.71 +/- 6.61 photon counts/ms) in the 12 eyes measured at least 6 months after ICL implantation. Pupillary block glaucoma requiring surgical intervention occurred in 3 patients (7.9%). One patient (2.6%) developed cataract 1.5 years after ICL implantation; both ICLs were removed, and the refractive errors were corrected by lensectomy and implantation of low-power posterior chamber IOLs. One patient (2.6%) showed progression of dry macular degeneration at 17 months. CONCLUSION: At 1 year, ICL implantation had good visual and refractive results with excellent biocompatibility. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm that significant complications do not occur in most patients over time.

Adult↗

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for spherical and spherocylindrical myopia. SETTING: Indiana Eye Institute, South Bend, Indiana, USA. METHODS: In a retrospective noncomparative single-surgeon interventional case series, outcomes in 222 consecutive eyes with myopia ranging from -1.25 to -11.25 diopters (D) and astigmatism up to +2.25 D treated with LASEK using a VISX Star S2 excimer laser were analyzed 4 days, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/40 or better in 84% of eyes at 4 days and in 98% at 2 weeks. At 12 months, in 84 eyes, the UCVA was 20/15 in 16 eyes (19.0%), 20/20 in 53 (63.1%), and 20/25 in 15 (17.9%). There was no loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and no eye required retreatment. CONCLUSION: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia provided excellent refractive and visual results with no loss of BSCVA and no serious complications. Subjective results and other measures of visual function need further evaluation.

Adult↗

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, predictability, and visual results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Bausch & Lomb Technolas(R) 217 scanning-spot laser for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: In a prospective study, 110 eyes of 58 patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.87 diopters (D) +/- 2.5 (SD) (range -1.0 to -11.4 D) had LASIK for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser. The primary outcome variables included preoperative and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), achieved versus attempted correction, vector analysis of astigmatism, and complications. RESULTS: One hundred ten eyes were available for analysis at 3 months. The mean SE refraction was reduced 95% (mean -0.23 +/- 0.4 D), and astigmatism was reduced 70% (mean 0.28 +/- 0.3 D). One day postoperatively, 100% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better, 96% had 20/25 or better, 77% had 20/20 or better, and 39% had 20/15 or better. At the 3-month examination, 100% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better, 95% had 20/25 or better, 83% had 20/20 or better, and 48% had 20/15 or better. Ninety percent of eyes were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: The Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser produced excellent postoperative UCVA and BSCVA. It was predictable, safe, and effective for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the stability of the procedure.

Adult↗

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy versus photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia. A prospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the early postoperative visual rehabilitation after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia. SETTING: CODET Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: This prospective study included 50 eyes of 25 patients with myopia who received LASEK in 1 eye and PRK in the contralateral eye. Excimer laser corneal ablation was done using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Patients were seen at 1 and 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month. Discomfort, subjective uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), objective UCVA, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal clarity (haze), and time for corneal reepithelialization were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent and 80% of the LASEK eyes had more discomfort at 1 day and 3 days, respectively. Eighty percent and 96% of the PRK eyes had better subjective UCVA at 1 day and 3 days, respectively. Corneas were fully reepithelialized at a mean of 3.3 days +/- 0.5 (SD) and 3.6 +/- 0.5 days in the PRK and LASEK groups, respectively. At 1 month, the UCVA was similar in both groups; no eye had lost lines of BCVA or developed haze. CONCLUSIONS: Both LASEK and PRK were effective and safe procedures in the surgical correction of myopia at the 1-month postoperative visit. Patients reported less discomfort and better visual acuity in their PRK eye during the early postoperative period. Patients should be informed that LASEK, whose acronym is similar to that of laser in situ keratomileusis, has a recovery speed that is similar to that of surface laser refractive procedures such as PRK.

Adult↗

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for low to high myopia and astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of low to high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Solo private practice, Mountain View, California, USA. METHODS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed in 146 eyes of 83 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism using a VISX Star S2 excimer laser (72 eyes) or a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (74 eyes). The mean preoperative myopic spherical equivalent was -5.32 diopters (D) (range -1.25 to -14.38 D). Data were collected prospectively with a follow-up of 1 to 12 months. Outcome measurements included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal haze, and complications. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months, no eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. After 6 months, the UCVA was 20/20 in 57% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. After 12 months, it was 20/20 in 56% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. No eye developed corneal haze that affected visual acuity. There were no serious or vision-threatening complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was safe and effective in treating a wide range of myopia and astigmatism. The potential advantages of LASEK over laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) include the elimination of stromal flap complications and greater choice in patient selection. The disadvantages include varying degrees of pain for 2 days and blurry vision for several days postoperatively.

Astigmatism↗

Epi-LASEK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To analyze patient results after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (epi-LASEK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Private practice setting, Columbus, Ohio, USA. METHODS: Three hundred forty-three eyes of 188 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were prospectively evaluated after having epi-LASEK by a single surgeon using the VISX Star S2 excimer laser. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, postoperative pain, time to epithelial healing, and postoperative haze were recorded. The patients were followed for up to 6 months. RESULTS: The mean preoperative sphere and cylinder were -5.42 diopters (D) +/- 2.62 (SD) (range -1.0 to -14.0 D) and 0.87 +/- 0.75 D (range 0 to 4.75 D), respectively. At 1 week, the mean UCVA was 20/30. At 6 months, it was 20/40 or better in 98% of patients. At 3 months, 78% and 92% of patients were within +/-0.5 D and +/-1.0 D, respectively, of the intended correction. This improved to 85% and 94%, respectively, at 6 months. The mean time to epithelial healing was 4.76 days (range 3 to 9 days). Most patients (87%) reported no postoperative pain. In the first 3 months, haze was noted in 1.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Epi-LASEK appeared to be a safe and effective treatment for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Most patients achieved postoperative visual acuities comparable to those with laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. There was a low incidence of haze and pain postoperatively.

Astigmatism↗

Choroidal neovascularization in phakic eyes with anterior chamber intraocular lenses to correct high myopia.

PURPOSE: To analyze the appearance, incidence, and characteristics of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients with high myopia corrected by implantation of a phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens (PACL). SETTING: University Miguel Hernández, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: The CNV observed in 294 consecutive eyes (181 patients) implanted with a PACL for the correction of high myopia (-7.0 to -38.0 diopters) was studied. The mean follow-up was 50.6 months +/- 32.8 (SD) (range 6 to 120 months). RESULTS: Choroidal neovascularization occurred in 5 eyes (1.70%); 3 eyes were in women, and 2 were in men. The interval between PACL implantation and CNV was 63.2 +/- 27.3 months (range 18 to 87 months). The CNV was subfoveal in 4 eyes and juxtafoveal in 1 case. The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after PACL implantation and before the appearance of CNV was 0.53 +/- 0.18 (range 0.4 [20/50] to 0.8 [20/25]); after CNV appeared, it was 0.26 +/- 0.18 (range 0.05 [20/400] to 0.5 [20/40]), a statistically significant difference (P =.001, paired Student t test). In 2 cases, the CNV was treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT); in the other 3 cases, PDT was rejected. The cumulative risk for CNV (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) in highly myopic patients corrected by PACL implantation was 0.43% at 18 months and 5.4% at 87 months. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a PACL to correct high myopia was followed by a small incidence of CNV (cumulative risk of 5.4% at 87 months). The appearance of CNV was followed by a significant decrease in BSCVA.

Adolescent↗