Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Learning Disabilities”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Interpretation of facial expressions of affect in children with learning disabilities with verbal or nonverbal deficits.

The ability to identify facial expressions of happiness, sadness, anger, surprise,fear, and disgust was studied in 48 nondisabled children and 76 children with learning disabilities aged 9 through 12. On the basis of their performance on the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test and the Benton Visual Retention Test, the LD group was divided into three subgroups: those with verbal deficits (VD), nonverbal deficits (NVD), and both verbal and nonverbal (BD) deficits. The measure of ability to interpret facial expressions of affect was a shortened version of Ekman and Friesen's Pictures of Facial Affect. Overall, the nondisabled group had better interpretive ability than the three learning disabled groups and the VD group had better ability than the NVD and BD groups. Although the identification level of the nondisabled group differed from that of the VD group only for surprise, it was superior to that of the NVD and BD groups for four of the six emotions. Happiness was the easiest to identify, and the remaining emotions in ascending order of difficulty were anger, surprise, sadness, fear, and disgust. Older subjects did better than younger ones only for fear and disgust, and boys and girls did not differ in interpretive ability. These findings are discussed in terms of the need to take note of the heterogeneity of the learning disabled population and the particular vulnerability to social imperception of children with nonverbal deficits.

Child↗
PubMed1996

Learning disabled and average readers' working memory and comprehension: does metacognition play a role?

The present study investigates (a) whether learning disabled readers' working memory deficits that underlie poor reading comprehension are related to a general system, and (b) whether metacognition contributes to comprehension beyond what is predicted by working memory and word knowledge. To this end, performance between learning and disabled (N = 60) and average readers (N = 60) was compared on the reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary subtests of the Nelson Skills Reading Test, Sentence Span test composed of high and low imagery words, and a Metacognitive Questionnaire. As expected, differences between groups in working memory, vocabulary, and reading measures emerged, whereas ability groups were statistically comparable on the Metacognitive Questionnaire. A within-group analysis indicated that the correlation patterns between working memory, vocabulary, metacognition, and reading comprehension were not the same between ability groups. For predicting reading comprehension, the metacognitive questionnaire best predicted learning disabled readers' performance, whereas the working memory span measure that included low-imagery words best predicted average achieving readers' comprehension. Overall, the results suggest that the relationship between learning disabled readers' generalised working memory deficits and poor reading comprehension may be mediated by metacognition.

Child↗
PubMed1990

A comparison of children with and without learning disabilities on social problem-solving skill, school behavior, and family background.

The study compared 86 children with learning disabilities (LD) with 86 matched children without learning disabilities (NLD) on three domains of variables: social problem-solving skill, teacher-rated school behavior and competence, and family background. The children with LD and the NLD group differed on variables in all three domains. More specifically, the children with LD were able to generate fewer alternatives for solving social problem situations, showed less tolerance for frustration and less adaptive assertiveness, and had more overall classroom behavior problems and less personal and social competence in a variety of areas as rated by teachers. Children having LD also showed more family background difficulties (e.g., lack of educational stimulation at home, economic difficulties). The findings suggest the need for greater attention to social and behavioral remediation for children with LD and greater involvement of their families, in addition to the cognitive and academic remediation emphasized in existing curricula for children with LD.

Child↗
PubMed2002

Rights not restrictions for learning disabled adults: a response to Spiecker and Steutel.

What follows is a response to an article by Spiecker and Steutel in which they pose the question of whether sex between people with "mental retardation" (sic) is morally permissible and in which they argue that since many such people cannot give "valid consent", the additional consent of caretakers may be required. However, we argue that the term "mental retard" is offensive and that either the UK terminology ("the learning disabled") or the internationally accepted term ("intellectually disabled") are more acceptable. Moreover, we point out that Spiecker and Steutel are mistaken. Many "learning disabled" people can and do give "valid consent". In any case, their question is itself dubious. Why should two learning disabled people who want to have sex together need anyone else's consent? In addition, we briefly address the rights of the learning disabled to the same sexual freedom as others, on the one hand, and to freedom from sexual exploitation on the other hand. Finally, we consider the implications of these issues for moral education. We suggest that carers need to develop empathy and, where necessary, advocacy skills. We point to the existence of training programmes on sexuality and protection issues.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Defining and classifying learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

This paper provides an overview of current conceptualizations of learning disabilities and ADHD, a conceptual framework critical for defining and classifying each disorder and for distinguishing each disorder from the other and from other, less common problems of childhood. At a most basic level, reading disability or dyslexia (the most common and best defined of the learning disabilities) and ADHD represent two distinct disorders that may frequently cooccur in the same unfortunate child but that can be clearly distinguished from one another. Reading disability represents a disorder of cognitive functioning. In contrast, ADHD is defined by the child's behavior as perceived by the child's parents and teachers; ADHD thus refers to a disorder affecting primarily the behavioral domain. Within the last decade, considerable progress has been made in our understanding of reading and reading disability. Converging evidence from several lines of investigation now indicates that reading ability conforms to a normal distribution model, so that there is a continuum of reading ability and reading disability. Children along this continuum differ by degree but not in kind. Cutoff points may be instituted to segment this continuous distribution, but these will be arbitrary and will not reflect any natural joints in nature; there is no second mode or "hump" in the distribution of reading ability. The normal model of reading and reading disability indicates that reading disability is related to normal reading ability, that there is a seamless transition from good to poor reading ability. Awareness of this relationship is critical to our approach to understanding the basis of reading disability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Prevalence of communication disorders in students with learning disabilities.

The prevalence of communication disorders in a population of 242 children with learning disabilities between 8 and 12 years of age enrolled in a school system in Alabama was studied. The prevalence of articulation, language, voice, fluency, and hearing disorders was determined through an individual assessment program. A speech, language, or hearing problem was exhibited by 96.2% (233) of the 242 children studied. Language deficits were found in 90.5%, articulation deficits in 23.5%, voice disorders in 12%, and fluency disorders in 1.2% of the students with learning disabilities. Puretone hearing deficits were observed in 7.4% and middle ear function deficits were observed in 15.7% of the students. Only 6% of the children were receiving the services of a speech-language pathologist.

Alabama↗
PubMed1993

The write-say method for improving spelling accuracy in children with learning disabilities.

We evaluated a teaching strategy designed to improve spelling accuracy in children with learning disabilities. The write-say method provides immediate feedback to dual sensory modalities (i.e., visual and auditory) following the administration of a daily spelling test. Four males and three females (mean age = 11.61 years) with learning disabilities were introduced to the write-say procedure within a multiple-baseline design. Compared to control conditions (i.e., studying words on one's own), experimental procedures significantly enhanced subjects' spelling accuracy in a brief period of time. The write-say procedure was also advocated as a cost-effective method of spelling instruction for small classroom settings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Verbal contextual generalization in children with and without learning disabilities.

Braine's (1963) model of language development emphasizes the use of auditory or temporal processing so verbal contextual generalization can be produced. Recent literature on auditory or temporal processing skills of children with learning disabilities led to the prediction that these children would find it much more difficult to generalize contextually than would children without learning disabilities. The present study did not support this prediction. The implications were discussed in view of research on auditory or temporal processing skills of children with learning disabilities.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The use of the Staggered Spondaic Word and the competing environmental sounds tests in the evaluation of central auditory function of learning disabled children.

Children aged 6 to 12 years with intelligence and pure-tone hearing within the normal range (91 functioning academically within the middle 50% and having uneventful hearing health histories and 76 demonstrating learning disabilities) were evaluated with dichotic central auditory listening tasks. Auditory response patterns were established and analyzed for normal and learning disability-specific performance. Children with learning disability-specific performance. Children with learning disabilities performed more poorly than "normal" peers on verbal and nonverbal listening tasks, suggesting learning disabled children may be identified by auditory performance on dichotic listening skills.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1999

Spatial and emotional aspects of language inferencing in nonverbal learning disabilities.

Although subtle linguistic deficits have been postulated for children identified with nonverbal learning disabilities (NLD), there is little empirical evidence to support this contention. Two experimental language inferencing measures that have been demonstrated to be problematic for individuals with right hemisphere brain damage (RHBD) and one norm-referenced inferencing task were examined in three groups of children aged 9-13: (1) children with NLD (n = 14), (2) children with verbal impairments (VI) (n = 14), and (3) children without learning disabilities who served as controls (n = 19). The NLD and VI groups did not differ from one another on any of the three measures, indicating a generalized language inferencing deficit in the NLD group. Relative to the control group, however, the NLD group experienced specific difficulties with spatial and emotional inferencing. The implications for right hemisphere involvement in the NLD profile are examined in relation to the effects of working memory on inferential abilities.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Looking through other lenses and listening to other voices: stretching the boundaries of learning disabilities.

The articles in this special series have drawn on publications and research outside the traditional special education literature in order to take a fresh look at learning disabilities. The authors have sought to use these different lenses and to listen to different voices, including student voices, to examine our current assumptions--theoretical, practical, and legal. Some of the authors have stood back and asked difficult questions about what purposes are served by the field of learning disabilities in the larger context of schooling and society. On the other hand, many of the authors have sought to get closer to children and youth who are labeled learning disabled and to get a better view from the tiny, yet critical, moments that make up a life and a classroom. Together these telescopic and microscopic views offer us ways to challenge our assumptions and practices, and ways to create new ones.

Education, Special↗
PubMed1989

A comparison of students with learning disabilities to low achieving and higher achieving students on three dimensions of social competence.

Research continues to accumulate attesting to the fact that many children with learning disabilities are experiencing social difficulties in school. Nonetheless, it is also clear that achievement deficits, with or without the presence of a handicapping condition, are also related to social problems in the classroom. Several studies attempting to clarify the relative roles of handicapping condition and achievement in social adjustment have produced mixed results. The purpose of the present study was to clarify this issue further by examining the social differences between elementary school students with learning disabilities and other low achieving and higher achieving children on three social dimensions: sociometric status, behavior as rated by teachers, and self-ratings of social competence. The results indicated that the children with learning disabilities may be a higher risk socially than their low achieving and higher achieving peers. Variables that may account for these results are discussed as well as directions for future research.

Achievement↗
PubMed2004

Patient with partial trisomy 9q and learning disability but no pyloric stenosis.

Partial trisomy of the long arm of chromosome 9 represents a very rare and heterogeneous group of chromosomal aberrations. Associated clinical features include learning disability and pyloric stenosis. We present the first patient to be reported with a duplication of the chromosome region 9q22.1-->q33. The patient (female, age 17 years) presented with growth retardation, microcephaly, facial dysmorphia, oesophageal atresia, aortic stenosis, ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect II, hypothyroidism, and learning disability, but no pyloric stenosis. A review of all cases of partial trisomy 9q reported in the literature demonstrates that learning disability is a characteristic feature of this group of chromosomal aberrations. However, there are cases of duplications of the same chromosome 9 material, with and without pyloric stenosis. This study provides new information for future genetic counselling, especially in cases of prenatal diagnosis of partial trisomy 9q.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed1998

The changing emphasis of mental health and learning disability nurse education in the UK and ideal models of its future development.

This paper reports the findings of a research study funded by the English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (ENB), which explored the impact of community care reforms on mental health and learning disability nurses and their practice. In this study we were struck by the divergent views of our respondents about the nature of mental health and learning disability nursing as practice disciplines and the implications of these views for the future shape of preregistration educational preparation. We noted, in particular, the debate between those who advocate what is referred to as specialist educational preparation and others who favour generic preparation. The specialist-generic debate is relevant to nursing as a whole but was magnified in the context of our study because genericism was perceived by many of our respondents as a threat to the minority branches and especially to those (arguably mental health and learning disability) that are not rooted in the biomedical tradition of general nursing. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate as it impinges on the two nursing specialties by developing models of future nurse education grounded in the empirical data from our research and interrogating them to draw out their central features. Two models are clearly independent: the 'specialist' and the 'generic' models. Another three models are partial in that they draw upon the first two: the 'pragmatic' model, the 'unity-of-nursing' model, and the 'social care' model. A common feature of the pragmatic and unity-of-nursing models is that they support the existing DipHE programme, which is now the dominant form of preregistration nurse preparation in the UK. The social care model is applicable principally to learning disability nursing.

Community Mental Health Services↗
PubMed1989

Depression, learning disability, and school behavior problems.

It is possible that recurrent depression (primary affective illness) is the most significant variable related to school problems of a behavioral nature in children manifesting developmental specific learning disabilities. The association of school problems and depression was investigated at a private school for children with developmental specific learning disabilities. These children were of normal intelligence and were free of primary conduct or thought disturbances. Prior to entering school, 95% of the students fulfilled criteria for developmental specific learning disabilities and 64% for depression with or without hyperactivity. Students manifesting no diagnosable behavioral condition prior to entrance continued to be relatively free of behavioral problems during their stay at school. Students with both depression and hyperactivity showed the most problematic behavior followed by students with depression without hyperactivity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Brainstem evoked potentials in learning disabled children.

Averaged brainstem auditory responses (BAER) were recorded using left and right ear stimulation with clicks of 90 dBs in two groups of primary school children (control and learning disabled). A linear multiple regression model was used in an attempt to demonstrate the effects of sex, high risk factors related to brain damage and learning disability on the evoked responses. Sex showed a strong influence in the latencies of the first five peaks, with girls having shorter latencies. Risk factors had an effect on the latency of peak V, the I-V interval and the V/I amplitude ration, but only when the left ear was stimulated. Learning disability had no significant influence according to this analysis. Multivariate test of complete homogeneity showed highly significant differences between LD and control boys when the left ear was stimulated and between control and LD girls when the right ear was stimulated. Principal component analyses revealed differences between the two groups: the BAER components of the control subjects showed a minor source of variance when the right ear was stimulated. A contrary effect was observed in LD children. Such differences might be related to ear preference and hemispheric dominance.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The relationship of self-injurious behavior and aggression to social skills in persons with severe and profound learning disability.

In this study, we investigated differences in social skills among four groups of individuals with severe and profound learning disabilities. The comparison groups were composed of individuals engaging in self-injurious behavior, aggression, both behaviors, or neither of the behaviors. We measured social skills using the Matson Evaluation of Social Skills for Individuals with Severe Retardation, a standardized assessment of social skills in persons with severe or profound learning disability. The results indicated that individuals displaying maladaptive behaviors exhibited a restricted range of social behaviors compared to controls. Also, group membership based on self-injury and aggression was predicted based on profiles of scores on the Matson Evaluation of Social Skills for Individuals with Severe Retardation. These findings are consistent with reports in other studies that note social skills deficits in aggressive and self-injurious persons with learning disabilities. However, in this case a standardized assessment of these deficits was possible and specific skills problems were identified. Implications of the findings for identification and treatment of self-injury and aggression are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

A cluster analysis of learning disabled children.

Cluster analysis was employed with the intent of describing more homogeneous subgroups of learning disabled (LD) children. The parents and teachers of 29 children placed in special education as learning disabled completed questionnaires concerning demographic information regarding the families; birth, medical, and developmental histories regarding the children were also included. Variables for the analysis were those found, by means of discriminant analysis in an earlier study, to be significantly related to LD as opposed to regular education children. The presence of developmental delays (speaking or walking later than expected), birth order, and sex of the children were influential in the definition of the clusters.

Birth Order↗