Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

Multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, phase II trial, 33 patients with previously untreated stage IIIB (n = 8) or IV (n = 25) NSCLC received intravenous infusions of docetaxel 80 mg/m2 followed immediately by carboplatin dosed to AUC of 6 mg/ml/min (Calvert's formula) every three weeks. Patients also received dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for three days beginning one day before each docetaxel treatment. Filgrastim was not allowed during the first cycle and was added only if a patient experienced febrile neutropenia or grade 4 neutropenia lasting > or = 7 days. RESULTS: There were 1 complete and 11 partial responses for an objective response rate of 43% (95% CI: 24%-63%) in 28 evaluable patients and 36% (95% CI: 20%-55%) in the intent-to-treat population. The median duration of response was 5.5 months (range 3.0-12.5 months). The median survival was 13.9 months (range 1-35+ months); one-year survival was 52%. The most common toxicity was hematologic, which included grade 4 neutropenia (79% of patients and 7% percent of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (15% of patients); there were no episodes of grade 3 or 4 infection. The most common severe nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia (24%) and myalgia (12%); there were no grade 3 or 4 neurologic effects. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin has an acceptable toxicity profile and is active in the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This combination is being evaluated in a randomized phase III trial involving patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Aged↗

A phase I study of gemcitabine and epirubicin for the treatment of platinum-resistant or refractory advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is active in patients with otherwise resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. As the drug is well tolerated, studies using gemcitabine combined with other antineoplastic agents are needed. The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin combined with gemcitabine, with and without support of G-CSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine (G) (starting dose 800 mg/m2 day 1 and 8; 200 mg/m2 escalation per level) and epirubicin (E) (starting dose 60 mg/m2 day 1; 15 mg/m2 escalation per level) were given every 21 days for four to six cycles. G-CSF (filgrastim 5 microg/kg/die) was given in case of grade 4 neutropenia (levels without support) or from day 9 up to leukocyte count > 10.000/mm3 after nadir (levels with support). Cohorts of three patients were enrolled at each level, and another three patients were planned, if one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was registered. MTD was determined first without and then with G-CSF. RESULTS: Four levels were studied (G 800 + E 60; G 1000 + E 60; G 1000 + E 75; G 1000 + E 75 + G-CSF) with four, four, three and three patients enrolled, respectively. DLT (grade 4 febrile neutropenia) was observed in two patients at level 3. Thus, G1000 + E 60 mg/m2 was the MTD without G-CSF. The addition of prophylactic G-CSF did not allow a further increase of the dose and grade 4 thrombocytopenia was the DLT at level 4. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Grade 2 mucositis was reported in four patients. Among the 13 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, 3 partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 23.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (day 1, 8) and epirubicin at 60 mg/m2 (day 1) is a feasible therapy. Grade 4 neutropenia is frequent and G-CSF support is often required. With prophylactic support of G-CSF, the DLT is thrombocytopenia.

Adult↗

A phase I study of sequential vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: In vitro experiments suggest that administration of vinorelbine preceding paclitaxel results in synergistic cytotoxic effects. A phase I dose escalation trial of vinorelbine daily x 3 with paclitaxel on day 3 repeated every 28 days in metastatic breast cancer patients was completed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients, PS 0-2, without evidence of CNS disease or prior neuropathies were treated with vinorelbine at dose levels 7, 10, 13 mg/m2 per day and paclitaxel over three hours at dose levels of 135, 175, and 200 mg/m2. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with six dose levels were studied. At dose level 1, patients developed intolerable but reversible neutropenia. Subsequent dose levels required filgrastim. Dose limiting toxicities were myalgia and fatigue at vinorelbine 13 mg/m2/day and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2. Neuropathy was minor. Twelve of twenty-five patients with measurable disease had a rapid response which did not correlate with dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential administration of these two agents demonstrates activity in breast cancer patients. Phase II dosing on this schedule should be vinorelbine 13 mg/m2/day x 3 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2. With proper selection of patients, concern about neurologic toxicity should not impede future trials of vinorelbine with paclitaxel.

Adult↗

Cardiac effects of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with poor prognosis breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the long term cardiac effects of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide given to women with early stage, poor prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage 2 breast cancer and 10+ nodes or 4+ nodes and estrogen receptor negative tumor, or stage 3 breast cancer received three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m2 with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support. Treatment was given every 28 days (n = 79) or 21 days (n = 20). Fifty patients received radiotherapy to the chest wall or breast, 25 of to the left side. Patients were assessed clinically regularly during chemotherapy and at least three times yearly after completion of treatment. Cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed by radionuclide scan before therapy, after each cycle of chemotherapy, three months and six months after completion of chemotherapy, and yearly thereafter until relapse. RESULTS: Ninety-nine women were treated, and 92 completed all three cycles of chemotherapy. The median age was 43 years (range 24 to 60 years). All patients were included in this analysis. The median relapse-free survival was 39 months (11 to 68 months). There was a significant fall in LVEF during chemotherapy. In general, there was no further deterioration in cardiac function from the third month after cessation of treatment, however there was substantial variation between individuals. 35 patients had at least one LVEF measure less than normal (< 50%), but the LVEF returned to normal in 20 of these with further follow-up. Cardiac dysfunction was not increased in women who received radiotherapy and was not different between cohorts given chemotherapy every three or every four weeks. One patient died of acute myocardial necrosis following the third cycle of chemotherapy. Two patients developed clinical evidence of cardiac failure, and another had radiological signs but was asymptomatic. One woman died of progressive cardiac failure, one recovered clinically but also developed recurrent breast cancer, while the third recovered after commencement of medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: During follow-up after high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as delivered in this study, the LVEF fell to below normal in approximately one third of patients. However, in over half of these patients the LVEF subsequently recovered to the normal range, and the incidence of clinically evident chronic cardiac failure was low. Further follow-up is required to assess the long-term safety. A randomized comparison with standard-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy is needed to determine whether this regimen is associated with an increased risk of clinical cardiac toxicity.

Adolescent↗

Paclitaxel plus topotecan treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Used as single agents, paclitaxel and topotecan have demonstrated promising activity in treating patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We conducted a phase II clinical trial to investigate the activity and tolerability of the combination of both drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive NHL who had previously been treated with a maximum of two prior chemotherapeutic regimens were given intravenous infusions of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over three hours on day one and topotecan 1 mg/m2 over 30 minutes daily from days one to five. All patients received daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) 5 microg/kg starting 24 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy until neutrophil recovery. Treatments were repeated every three weeks for a maximum of six courses. Patients who achieved partial remission or complete remission (CR) after at least two courses were offered stem cell transplantation, if eligible. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients eligible for this trial, 66 (93%) were evaluable for treatment response. The median age was 53 years (range 23 to 74 years). Thirty-six percent of the patients had previously been treated with ara-C/platinum-based regimens, and 48% failed to achieve CR after primary induction therapy. Sixty-seven percent of the patients had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels at the time of treatment initiation. The overall response rate was 48% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 36%-61%). Patients who had primary refractory disease had a response rate of 31%, compared with 65% for patients who did not. Similarly, the response rate of patients who failed to achieve CR after their most recent previous therapy was 37%, compared with a 65% response rate in patients who relapsed from a first or second CR. The median duration of response was six months. A total of 199 courses were given, with a median of three courses per patient. Neutropenia at levels < or = 500 leukocytes per microliter was observed after 32% of the courses, and thrombocytopenia at levels < or = 20,000 platelets per microliter was observed after 17% of the courses. Grade 3-4 neutropenic fever occurred after 6% of the courses. Non-hematologic toxic effects were predominantly grade 1-2. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and topotecan is an effective first or second line salvage therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL who had prior anthracycline- or platinum-based chemotherapy.

Adult↗

Reduction of chemotherapy-induced febrile leucopenia by prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin in small-cell lung cancer patients: an EORTC double-blind placebo-controlled phase III study.

BACKGROUND: CDE (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide) is one of the standard chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with myelosuppression as dose-limiting toxicity. In this trial the impact of prophylactic antibiotics on incidence of febrile leucopenia (FL) during chemotherapy for SCLC was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with chemo-naïve SCLC were randomized to standard-dose CDE (C 1,000 mg/m2 day 1, D 45 mg/m2 day 1, E 100 mg/m2 days 1-3. i.v., q 3 weeks, x5) or to intensified CDE chemotherapy (125% dose, q 2 weeks, x4, with filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day days 4-13) to assess the impact on survival (n = 240 patients). Patients were also randomized to prophylactic antibiotics (ciprofloxacin 750 mg plus roxithromycin 150 mg, bid. days 4-13) or to placebo in a 2 x 2 factorial design (first 163 patients). This manuscript focuses on the antibiotics question. RESULTS: The incidence of FL during the first cycle was 25% of patients in the placebo and 11% in the antibiotics arm (P = 0.010; 1-sided), with an overall incidence through all cycles of 43% vs. 24% respectively (P = 0.007; 1-sided). There were less Gram-positive (12 vs. 4), Gram-negative (20 vs. 5) and clinically documented (38 vs. 15) infections in the antibiotics arm. The use of therapeutic antibiotics was reduced (P = 0.013; 1-sided), with less hospitalizations due to FL (31 vs. 17 patients, P = 0.013: 1-sided). However, the overall number of days of hospitalization was not reduced (P = 0.05; 1-sided). The number of infectious deaths was nil in the antibiotics vs. five (6%) in the placebo arm (P = 0.022; 2-sided). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic ciprofloxacin plus roxithromycin during CDE chemotherapy reduced the incidence of FL, the number of infections, the use of therapeutic antibiotics and hospitalizations due to FL by approximately 50%, with reduced number of infectious deaths. For patients with similar risk for FL, the prophylactic use of antibiotics should be considered.

Adult↗

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every two weeks.

OBJECTIVES: This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) when administered on a once-every-2-week schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 was administered to successive cohorts of patients at progressively increasing starting doses ranging from 125 to 350 mg/m2. The MTD and DLTs were determined both for CPT-11 alone and for CPT-11 followed by filgrastim (G-CSF). Plasma samples were obtained during the first 24 hours after initial dosing to determine the total concentrations (lactone + carboxylate forms) of CPT-11; of the active metabolite SN-38; and of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). RESULTS: Neutropenic fever was the DLT for CPT-11 at the 300 mg/m2 dose level. When G-CSF was added, dose escalation beyond 350 mg/m2 could not be achieved due to grade 2-3 toxicities that prevented on-time retreatment with CPT-11. Severe, late diarrhea was uncommon on this schedule. Peak plasma concentrations of SN-38 and SN-38G were approximately 2.5% and 4.2% of the corresponding peak plasma concentration for CPT-II, respectively The harmonic mean terminal half-lives for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were 7.1 hours, 13.4 hours, and 12.7 hours, respectively. No predictive correlation was observed between CPT-11 or SN-38 peak concentration or AUC and first-cycle diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, or vomiting. Across the range of doses studied, mean CPT-11 clearance was 14.0 +/- 4.0 l/h/m2 and volume of distribution was 146 +/- 45.9 l/m2. CONCLUSIONS: When administered every two weeks, the recommended phase II starting dose of CPT-11 is 250 mg/m2 when given alone and 300 mg/m2 when supported by G-CSF. This every-two-week regimen offers a tolerable and active alternative to weekly or every-three-week single-agent CPT-11 therapy.

Adult↗

A pilot study of dose intense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by infusional paclitaxel in high-risk primary breast cancer.

We conducted a pilot study of dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) combination chemotherapy followed by infusional paclitaxel (T) in primary breast cancer to determine its safety and feasibility. Twenty-two subjects (10 with stage II and > or = 4 positive lymph nodes, and 12 with stage III disease) were treated with AC (A 60 mg/m2 and C 2000 mg/m2) with filgrastim every 14 days for three cycles followed by infusional paclitaxel (140 mg/m2 over 96 h) every 14 days for three cycles. Mean overall cycle length was 15.3 days and mean duration of therapy was 92 days. Dose reductions of C or T were required in 7/132 (5.3%) cycles for mucositis, diarrhea, or failure to recover platelets by day 15. Ninety-five percent of subjects had grade 4 neutropenia and 1 subject had a platelet nadir of < 20,000. Actual delivered dose intensity (DI) over six cycles was: A 27 mg/m2 per week; C 892 mg/m2 per week; T 64 mg/m2 per week (90.6, 89.2, and 91.4% of planned DI, respectively). Average total dose administered was: A 180 mg/m2; C 5880 mg/m2; T 403 mg/m2 (100, 98, and 96% of planned total doses, respectively). Clinical response rate in 10 subjects receiving neoadjuvant therapy was 100% (4 complete response, 6 partial response). Four subjects had a pathologic complete response (three subjects without evidence of malignancy and one subject with ductal carcinoma in situ.) Administration of dose dense AC followed by infusional paclitaxel in 14-day cycles is feasible and this regimen is active in breast cancer.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

High-dose paclitaxel plus G-CSF for malignant mesothelioma: CALGB phase II study 9234.

BACKGROUND: New agents with activity in mesothelioma are sorely needed. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) therefore performed a phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with malignant mesothelioma who had no prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients accrued to this multi-institutional phase II study of paclitaxel given as a 24-hour infusion at 250 mg/m2 every three weeks plus filgrastim (G-CSF) 300 mcg subcutaneously days 3-18. RESULTS: There were three (9%) regressions of evaluable disease. The median survival was five months (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.9-9.6 months), the one-year survival rate was 14% and the two-year survival rate was 6%. Toxicity was tolerable with one death from pneumonia (without neutropenia) on day 18 and a 23% rate of grade 4 granulocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The level of activity seen with paclitaxel is similar to that seen in other CALGB trials of the single agents carboplatin, trimetrexate and 5-azacytidine. Future studies of of paclitaxel (at lower doses) in combination with synergistic agents could be considered.

Adult↗

The intramuscular administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as an adjunct to chemotherapy in pretreated ovarian cancer patients: an Italian Trials in Medical Oncology (ITMO) Group pilot study.

No published data are available concerning the activity and tolerability of intramuscularly administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in humans. To fill this gap, 19 patients with advanced ovarian cancer previously treated with at least one first-line chemotherapy cycle received the following myelosuppressive regimen: mitoxantrone (DHAD) 12 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1; ifosfamide (IFO) 4 g m-2 i.v. on days 1 and 2; mesna 800 mg m-2 i.v. t.i.d. on days 1 and 2. G-CSF (Filgrastim) was given at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day i.m. from day 6 to day 19, its pharmacokinetics being assessed in five patients. The neutrophil nadir was observed after a mean period of 8 days, and the neutrophil count was < 1.0 x 10(3) mm-3 for a mean of 6 days during the cycle of chemotherapy. The neutrophil count fell after the withdrawal of G-CSF on the 19th day of treatment. The difference in absolute neutrophil count between day 19 and day 21 was statistically significant (P = 0.0001); nevertheless, at day 21 no WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported. DHAD and IFO were respectively given at 95% and 93% of the planned dose. The pharmacokinetics of G-CSF i.m. seems to be similar to that of the drug given subcutaneously. No evidence of cumulative myelosuppression was observed. G-CSF was well tolerated and no complications were observed at the injection sites. In conclusion, if the results obtained in this pilot study regarding the activity of i.m. G-CSF are confirmed by a randomised trial, the intramuscular administration of G-CSF could become a valid alternative for patients who dislike the subcutaneous route and who are being treated with chemotherapy that does not induce profound thrombocytopenia.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to deliver four cycles of ifosfamide and epirubicin every 14 days in women with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Twenty patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were treated with four cycles of ifosfamide/mesna 5 g m-2 and epirubicin 60 mg m-2 every 14 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim). Complete remission occurred in six out of the 20 patients (30%, 95% confidence interval 12-54%) and there were 12 partial responders (60%, 95% confidence interval 37-81%), thus giving an overall response rate of 90% (95% confidence interval 63-97%). Two patients had progressive disease. The median duration of response for those patients with metastatic disease was 7.3 (1.3-20.1+) months. The median survival time for these patients was 15 (5.3-27.9+) months. Of the four patients treated with locally advanced disease three achieved a complete clinical response and one a partial response. Three out of four of these patients subsequently underwent a mastectomy, and in one of these no viable tumour was seen. Our conclusion is that this regimen is excellent palliation for metastatic disease and possibly useful neoadjuvant treatment.

Adult↗

High-dose carboplatin, thiotepa and cyclophosphamide (CTC) with peripheral blood stem cell support in the adjuvant therapy of high-risk breast cancer: a practical approach.

In 29 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage II-III breast cancer, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were mobilised following fluorouracil 500 mg m-2, epirubicin 90-120 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m-2 (FEC) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; Filgrastim) 300 microgram s.c. daily. In all but one patient, mobilisation was successful, requiring three or fewer leucocytopheresis sessions in 26 patients; 28 patients subsequently underwent high-dose chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin 1600 mg m-2, thiotepa 480 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 6 g m-2 (CTC) followed by PBSC transplantation. Haemopoietic engraftment was rapid with a median time to neutrophils of 500 x 10(6) l(-1) of 9 days (range 8-10) in patients who received G-CSF after PBSC-transplantation; platelet transfusion independence was reached within a median of 10 days (range 7-16). Neutropenic fever occurred in 96% of patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity was substantial but reversible. Renal, neural or ototoxicity was not observed. Complications related to the central venous catheter were encountered in 64% of patients, with major vein thrombosis occurring in 18%. High-dose CTC-chemotherapy with PBSC-transplantation, harvested after mobilisation with FEC and G-CSF, is reasonably well tolerated without life-threatening toxicity and is a suitable high-dose strategy for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

High-dose intensity cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone by shortened intervals and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II study.

Twenty patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide (750 mg m(-2), day 1), epidoxorubicin (60 mg m(-2), day 1), vincristine (1.4 mg m(-2), day 1) and prednisone (100 mg m(-2), days 1-5) every 14 days. Shortening of intervals was associated with the prophylactic employment of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; specifically, filgrastim) administered at a dose of 300 microg subcutaneously from day 6 to day 11. The ratio between actually delivered dose intensity and planned dose intensity was 1.0 in 18 out the 20 patients. Toxicity was acceptable; response rate and survival are in the expected range. The present study demonstrated the feasibility of acceleration of chemotherapy cycles to obtain dose intensification in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Adult↗

Infusional 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and mitomycin C in advanced gastric cancer: a low cost effective regimen.

Recently, we reported a highly active regimen in advanced gastric cancer including a weekly administration of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil with the support of filgrastim. In order to simplify the administration and to decrease the toxicity of these drugs, mainly epidoxorubicin-induced alopecia, we designed a regimen including an infusional 5-fluorouracil schedule according to the de Gramont regimen, cisplatin and mitomycin C replacing epidoxorubicin. Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, every 2 weeks, 6S-stereoisomer-leucovorin 100 mg m(-2) i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) i.v. in a 22-h infusion, on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks, and mitomycin C 7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 6 weeks. Grades 3-4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) consisted mainly of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a complete response and 16 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.1-61.2%). The median survival was 11 months. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin according to de Gramont, and mitomycin C seems to be an active and safe regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Because of its low cost it may be suggested for patients not enrolled into clinical trials.

Adult↗

Induction, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), high-dose chemotherapy and PBSC infusion in patients with untreated stage IV breast cancer: outcomes by intent to treat analyses.

We investigated the outcomes of patients with breast cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC infusion. One hundred and fourteen patients with untreated stage IV breast cancer, with a median age of 46 years (range 24-62), were entered on a phase II trial consisting of; (1) doxorubicin, 5-flurouracil, methotrexate (AFM) x 4 courses at 2 week intervals; (2) cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), cisplatin (105 mg/m2) (CEP), filgrastim (6 micrograms/kg/day) and PBSC collection; (3) cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), carboplatin (800 mg/m2), (CTCb) followed by PBSC infusion. All patients received AFM, 107 (94%) received CEP, 93 (82%) received CTCb and PBSC as per protocol and 99 (87%) ultimately received HDC and PBSC. There was one infectious death after AFM and all other deaths were associated with progressive disease. Fifty-two patients (46%) are alive, 21 (18%) without progression, at a median 31 months (range 22-47). The probabilities of survival and progression-free survival at 3.5 years were 0.40 and 0.17, respectively. All 62 patients with visceral disease and/or a prior history of doxorubicin adjuvant therapy have relapsed or progressed. We conclude that the sequential administration of AFM, CEP and CTCb followed by PBSC resulted in long-term PFS only in patients who were NED, had bone-only disease or had lymph node or soft tissue disease with or without bone disease. Other strategies, aimed at improving responses to initial therapy, improving HDC regimens and/or developing immunomodulatory therapies, will be necessary to improve PFS for patients who fail doxorubicin adjuvant or who have visceral disease.

Adult↗

G-CSF administration following peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft in lymphoid malignancies: evidence for clinical benefits and reduction of treatment costs.

Clinical value and costs of G-CSF administration following autograft with mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were evaluated in two sequential groups of 20 patients each, treated for lymphoid neoplasms in the period February 1993 to January 1996. One group was given G-CSF (Filgrastim) (5 microg/kg/day), starting on day +1 until ANC was > 500/microl, the other received no G-CSF. All patients were conditioned with mitoxantrone 60 mg/m2 + L-PAM 180 mg/m2 and received large numbers of PBPC (median of 12 and 13 x 10(6) CD34+/kg, respectively). The median time to ANC > 500/microl was 10 days in the G-CSF group vs 14 days in controls (P < 0.0001). G-CSF was associated with a slightly faster platelet recovery (11 vs 13 days to plts > 20000/microl, P = 0.09). Median duration of fever (2.5 vs 5 days, P = 0.028), nonprophylactic antibiotics (8 vs 11 days, P = 0.019), and post-transplant hospitalization (13 vs 16 days, P = 0.0028) were also significantly reduced. The average cost per treatment in the G-CSF group amounted to about US$18241 as compared to US$21868 in the control group, implying a cost reduction of approximately 16%. Thus, G-CSF reduced morbidity with cost containment, supporting its use even if autograft is performed with large quantities of PBPC.

Adolescent↗

G-CSF serum pharmacokinetics during peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization: neutrophil count-adjusted dosage might potentially improve mobilization and be more cost-effective.

The optimal dosing schedule of G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization is still under investigation although many centers use 10 microg/kg/day in a single subcutaneous dose. However, G-CSF clearance increases with increasing absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Hence a G-CSF dosage adjusted to ANC might be a reasonable approach. We measured G-CSF trough serum levels by sandwich ELISA assay at different ANCs in eight patients undergoing treatment with filgrastim at 10 microg/kg/day in a single subcutaneous dose. A total of 26 samples were analyzed, and a strong correlation between increasing ANC and decreasing G-CSF levels was found by linear regression analysis (P < 0.0003, r2 = 0.4199). For ANC values above 5000/microl the trough serum levels, ie 24 h after administration, were consistently below the level that provides maximal clonogenic precursor stimulation in vitro (10 ng/ml). Serial serum G-CSF measurements performed in three patients at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after G-CSF administration, showed a reduction of the area under the curve (AUC) with increasing ANC. For an ANC of 20000/microl or greater, the G-CSF serum level fell under the maximal in vitro stimulation threshold of 10 ng/ml within 12 h. This preliminary pharmacokinetic data seems to suggest that an ANC-adjusted G-CSF dosing schedule might improve the design of PBPC mobilization regimens.

Adolescent↗

Sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with dose escalation of carboplatin with or without paclitaxel supported by G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells: a phase I/II study in advanced ovarian cancer.

To assess high-dose carboplatin chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel with filgrastim mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in a phase I/II study, a total of 21 patients with mostly chemonaive disease received four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy. Cycle 1 (cyclophosphamide, 6 g/m2) was followed by two cycles of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2 or 1800 mg/m2). Cycle 4 consisted of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2), etoposide (1600 mg/m2), and melphalan (140 mg/m2). Further chemotherapy intensification was achieved by adding paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) to all cycles with a fixed carboplatin dose (1600 mg/m2). Ototoxicity was dose-limiting for escalation of sequential cycles of carboplatin. Grade 2 and grade 3 ototoxicity, hearing loss not requiring a hearing aid, or hearing loss correctable with a hearing aid, was observed with carboplatin at 1800 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sequential carboplatin, therefore, was identified in this study as 1600 mg/m2. After cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 the median duration of leukopenia (<1.0x10(9)/l) was 7, 4, 4 and 6 days. Severe grade 3 and 4 infections were seen in only 7% of cycles. Of the 21 patients evaluable for disease response, 57% had complete remissions and 43% experienced partial remissions resulting in an overall response rate of 100%. The median progression-free survival is 25 (15-36) months, the median overall survival 36.5 (15-38) months. Most patients were suboptimally debulked or had bulky residual disease at the start of chemotherapy. Sequential high-dose chemotherapy to a maximum dose of 1600 mg/m2 carboplatin is effective and feasible. A randomized, prospective trial comparing sequential high-dose chemotherapy with optimal standard chemotherapy is now warranted.

Adult↗