Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DECONTAMINATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

[Preliminary evaluations of the use of dodecyl di-(beta-oxyethyl)-benzylammonium chloride as a routine decontaminant for isolation of mycobacteria].

The percentages of positive cultures of mycobacteria obtained from sputum, bronchial-aspirate and urine treated with 0.2% Bactofen and with 0.5% Desogen were compared. Respiratory materials gave significantly higher values of these percentages when treated with Bactofen. Urine showed opposite results but these were not statistically significant. Isolates of MOTT too were more frequent in specimens decontaminated with Bactofen. Contamination rate showed no modifications.

Benzalkonium Compounds↗

The potential for use of steam at atmospheric pressure to decontaminate or sterilize parenteral filling lines incorporating barrier isolation technology.

Barrier isolators that enclose aseptic filling equipment are being proposed as a means of: (1) assisting in achieving a 10(-6) sterility assurance level (SAL) in the filling area and (2) minimizing the clean environment required in the manufacturing area. The need for operator and maintenance access to the interior of the barrier isolators presents difficulties in achieving the above goals. Several methods are available for reducing the microbial level inside the isolation barrier. If the objective is the decontamination of all surfaces inside the enclosure, saturated steam at atmospheric pressure can be used. If the objective is to sterilize the inside of the enclosure, saturated steam at atmospheric pressure with added H2O2 can be used. Test data and practical interface considerations relative to various methodologies will be reviewed.

Air Pressure↗

[Can selective decontamination of the digestive tract as a routine procedure on intensive care units be recommended?].

After giving an overview on the epidemiological and microecological background, the applicable drugs, and the necessary microbiological surveillance for Selective Decontamination of the Digestive tract (SDD), the results of 2 new metaanalyses of 22 and 25 individual randomized studies are discussed. A 50%-reduction of the pneumonia incidence results in an only marginal reduction of the mortality rate in the subgroup of topically plus for the first few days systemically treated patients in mixed intensive care units. Facing the weak prognostic relevance of ventilator pneumonia, the reduction of microbial translocation from the lower GI tract as a major goal for SDD is discussed. The chance and the need to confirm a mortality benefit in multicentre trials enrolling large numbers of homogeneous surgical patients are explained. At the present time, SDD as a routine can not (yet) be recommended.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

[A cytogenetic study of the Chinese hamster lung cell line V-79 infected with Mycoplasma arginini and decontaminated using ciprofloxacin].

Karyotypic variability has been studied in a line of the Chinese hamster cells artificially contaminated with Mycoplasma arginini. The contaminated cultures differed from mycoplasma-free cells in cell distribution for chromosome number. The frequency of cells with modal chromosome number 21 decreased, while that of cells with 20 chromosomes increased. Decontamination of cell culture with ciprofloxacin (10 mg/ml) and a subsequent cultivation of cell in the antibiotic-free medium did not restore the original cell distribution for chromosome number. In-53--131 days after infection, the increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations was registered. Eradication of Mycoplasma by ciprofloxacin and a long-term cultivation in antibiotic-free medium restored the frequency of chromosomal aberrations to the control level corresponding to mycoplasma-free cultures. In contaminated cultures no cyto- or genotoxic effect of ciprofloxacin was observed. These data, together with the previous ones, enable the authors to recommend ciprofloxacin to make cell cultures free from mycoplasmas with minimal risk to change the original properties of cell lines.

Animals↗

Effect of selective bowel decontamination with norfloxacin on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, translocation, and survival in an animal model of cirrhosis.

Selective bowel decontamination with the orally administered quinolone antibiotic, norfloxacin, has been shown to suppress gut gram-negative bacteria and help prevent gram-negative infections in cirrhotic patients who are at high risk of bacterial infection. Because this drug does not eradicate gram-positive organisms, it is conceivable that gram-positives could replace the suppressed gram-negatives in the gut and lead to subsequent infection. Also the effect of norfloxacin on translocation (as defined by culture positivity of mesenteric lymph nodes) has received little attention. In this study, the effect of oral norfloxacin on translocation, bacterial peritonitis, and survival was investigated in an animal model of carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis and ascites. Treated rats received daily doses of orally administered norfloxacin from the onset of cirrhosis until they died or were killed. Controls received no antibiotic. Norfloxacin led to a reduction in bacterial peritonitis from 70% in untreated cirrhotic controls to 28% in treated cirrhotic rats; these data were statistically significant (P = .012). There was no effect on overall translocation rate (28% with norfloxacin vs. 50% without norfloxacin) (P > .1). Gram-positives were isolated in 100% of the bacterial peritonitis episodes and in 71.4% of culture-positive mesenteric lymph nodes in treated animals compared with only 25% of peritonitis episodes and 10% of culture-positive mesenteric lymph nodes of untreated cirrhotic controls (P < .01 for peritonitis and P < .05 for translocation). The survival rate was not different between groups (P > .1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

[Rules of decontamination and disinfection of medicosurgical instruments in the operating room].

Nosocomial infections may result from the reuse of surgical devices if adequate disinfection or sterilization measures are not employed. The first step of reprocessing occurs immediately after use in the operating room. This consists of cleaning and decontamination to eliminate organic material and to reduce the number of microorganisms, in order to protect personnel who subsequently manipulate these instruments and to facilitate the ultimate process of sterilization or disinfection. Instruments that cannot be sterilized must be submitted to "high level disinfection" to remove undesirable microorganisms. In order to guarantee the desired results of disinfection, it is very important to adopt reliable and effective protocols, chemical products with good germicidal properties and with minimal adverse effects on the personnel and the environment. The personnel involved in this delicate and important task must be thoroughly trained. If the above conditions are met, the infectious risk associated with reuse of surgical devices can be controlled.

Cross Infection↗

Indications for selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

Controversy exists as to the utility of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as a method of infection prevention in critically ill patients. A number of prospective randomly controlled studies and 2 meta-analyses have shown a statistically significant protective effective of SDD against nosocomial infection. Most other SDD trials have shown reductions in nosocomial infections, but these reductions have not been statistically significant. Nearly all SDD studies have shown a less clear mortality benefit, and in no trial has cost-effectiveness been critically evaluated. Side effects of SDD have been limited. Despite nearly a decade of use at some institutions, reports of antimicrobic resistance evolving with SDD and causing disease are infrequent. At this time, SDD cannot be recommended for all intensive care patients in all clinical settings. SDD may be an effective infection prevention method in intensive care units in which there is a high rate of nosocomial pneumonia and/or other infections and in the postoperative period of orthotopic liver transplantation. SDD may also be useful to eliminate resistant gram-negative bacilli colonizing patients who are at high risk for infection sequelae. When SDD is used, periodic surveillance for the emergence of resistant microorganisms is imperative.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: risks outweigh benefits for intensive care unit patients.

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) involves the administration of non-absorbable antibiotics (+/- a systemic antibiotic) to prevent colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients. The regimen is targeted at nosocomial gram-negative bacilli, some gram-positive bacteria and yeast. Although all studies of SDD have demonstrated reduced rates of bacterial colonization and most yielded lower respiratory tract infection, it is unclear if the major impact of SDD is on pneumonia or tracheobronchitis. SDD regimens utilizing a broad spectrum, systemic antibiotic appear to be more effective, suggesting that this constitutes early treatment rather than prophylaxis. To date, there is conflicting evidence that SDD significantly reduces length of stay, mortality, or hospital costs. Currently, there are concerns that SDD may result in increased colonization and infection with gram-positive organisms and multi-drug resistant pathogens, particularly in medical ICU patients or when used for extended periods of time.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Viewpoint: survival benefit by selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD).

Morbidity and mortality due to infection acquired either before or after admission to the intensive care unit is still a major problem. A limited range of potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPM) are involved, and infection with these PPM usually follows a predictable pattern. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) should be investigated further in patients with primarily curable diseases who are not infected on admission to intensive care but become infected there.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

[Prevention of infection in patients with agranulocytosis through isolation and whole-body decontamination].

During induction chemotherapy 21 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and agranulocytosis were prophylactically isolated either in reverse isolation (group A) or in sterile plastic-tent isolators with laminar air flow (Life Islands, group B). Patients of group B also received whole-body decontamination and sterile food. Life threatening septicemias were seen only in patients in reverse isolation. Granulocyte transfusions were highly successful in reducing infection-related mortality in group A. Seven additional patients with agranulocytosis of varying origin (group C) were protected in the Life Islands as effectively as the patients with acute leukemia.

Adolescent↗

Infection control in critically ill patients: effects of selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

The use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) to control infection in the intensive care unit (ICU) is reviewed. There are three basic patterns of infection in the ICU: primary endogenous, secondary endogenous, and exogenous. In exogenous infection, no microbial carriage precedes colonization and infection. In endogenous infection, infection is preceded by oropharyngeal or GI carriage. A primary endogenous infection is caused by an organism carried by the patient on admission to the ICU, whereas a secondary endogenous infection is caused by organisms acquired in the ICU. The traditional approach to infection control in the ICU has included frequent hand washing, limiting the use of agents for prophylaxis of stress-ulcer bleeding, and limiting the use of injectable antimicrobials to the treatment of infection in order to prevent resistance. The recognition that hand washing only partially reduces endogenous infection led to the use of nonabsorbable antimicrobials to abolish oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal carriage of potentially pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, the use of an injectable antimicrobial during the first four days in the ICU to control primary endogenous infection was considered not to lead to resistance as long as it was combined with nonabsorbable antimicrobials. Of 41 fully reported clinical trials of SDD, 33 showed a significant reduction of infectious morbidity among patients who received SDD. Of the 32 trials in which carriage of potential pathogens was a measured endpoint, 31 showed a reduction in carriage. Of the 24 studies in which resistance was an endpoint, 22 showed no increase in resistance associated with SDD. Only 10 of 35 trials that examined death showed a significant decrease in mortality. SDD, used in conjunction with traditional infection-control measures, diminishes microbial carriage and infectious morbidity in the ICU without increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Critical Care↗

Selective intestinal decontamination in patients with schistosomal hepatic fibrosis and low-protein ascites.

Selective intestinal decontamination (SID) for 7 days with norfloxacin (NF) was performed in 15 patients with schistosomal hepatic fibrosis (SHF) and low-protein ascites. Changes in ascitic fluid (AF) opsonic activity and complement3 (C3), complement4 (C4), total protein (TP) and albumin concentrations after NF therapy were compared with those of a control group composed of 15 untreated patients with similar characteristics. After oral NF administration, the mean % changes of AF opsonic activity & AF C3 & TP concentrations showed significant increases and were significantly higher than those in the control group. There were direct correlations between mean % changes in AF opsonic activity and C3 concentrations (r = 0.62). AF opsonic activity and TP concentrations (r = 0.54) and AF C3 and TP concentrations (r = 0.57) in the NF group. On the other hand, the AF C4 and albumin concentrations were not significantly changed in any group at the end of the study. Based on the results of the present study, it can be concluded that short-term NF therapy in patients with SHF and low-protein ascites increased AF opsonic activity and AF C3 and TP concentrations and hence, AF bactericidal activity. Study of larger numbers of patients for longer periods will determine if these beneficial effects on NF translate into a decreased incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with chronic liver disease and high-risk of infection.

Adult↗

[The use of the neustonic forms of bacilli for purifying and decontaminating reservoirs].

It is shown possible to select the bacterial strains which are neuston ones, i.e., concentrating on the water-atmosphere interface. The preparation based on the neuston form of Bacillus megaterium is more efficient for purification of water polluted with oil hydrocarbons than the preparation based on the planktonic form of the same culture. Preparation based on the neuston form of the aerobic spore-forming bacteria is effective for biological decontamination of sewage treated using conventional methods. Application of neuston bacterial forms permits intensifying the microbiological processes in the thin (15-40 microM) surface layer of water bodies.

Alcaligenes↗

Handpiece and water line decontamination and HIV transmission: a critique.

The survival of infective viral particles in disinfected handpieces and the dental unit water systems has become a matter of professional and public concern. This commentary evaluates the evidence, making some practical suggestions on water line decontamination and handpiece sterilization.

Cross Infection↗

Decontamination, sterilization, and disinfection.

Creating and maintaining a sterile environment before and during the surgical procedure minimizes the patient's risk of acquiring a postoperative wound infection. The most important measure in preventing postoperative wound infection is the application of flawless aseptic technique principles. It is important that everyone understands their role in reducing the risk of infection to the surgical patient. Prevention of infection begins in central supply with the decontamination, assembly, preparation, and sterilization of surgical items and continues with the surgical team as it monitors the implementation of aseptic technique principles in the operating suite.

Animals↗

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in intensive care patients.

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is a strategy designed to prevent or minimize infection in the intensive care unit. Despite being the best-evaluated manoeuvre ever in intensive care medicine, and one of the few interventions to have been subjected to scientific and statistical appraisal, SDD is still controversial. The reasons for this are discussed in this article.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Methods of gastric decontamination.

Gastric emptying may not be the most appropriate way to decontaminate a person who has self-poisoned. Other methods, including emetics, cathartics and the use of activated charcoals, may be more appropriate in some circumstances.

Cathartics↗

Activated charcoal supercedes ipecac as gastric decontaminant.

Syrup of ipecacuanha has previously been used to decontaminate patients following toxic or potentially toxic ingestions. The recent removal of this product from distribution in New Zealand has caused some concern to health professionals. This article outlines the relative merits of syrup of ipecacuanha and activated charcoal, and concludes that the latter is preferable in many respects. Details of its appropriate administration are discussed.

Antidotes↗