Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDICITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT--a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and of abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed in addition to US in the diagnosis of childhood appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred children with suspected appendicitis were included in a prospective randomized study. After clinical examination, the patients were randomly assigned to undergo US only (283 patients) or US with abdominal CT (317 patients). Radiologic findings were correlated with surgical, histopathologic, and clinical follow-up findings. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four (40.7%) of all patients had appendicitis. In the US only group, US had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 91%, negative predictive value of 92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 92%. The combination of US and CT performed in the other group yielded a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive predictive value of 87%, negative predictive value of 99%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93%. Analysis of data on US performed in all 600 patients and on CT performed in 317 patients revealed, respectively, sensitivities of 80% and 97%, specificities of 94% and 93%, positive predictive values of 91% and 92%, negative predictive values of 88% and 98%, and diagnostic accuracies of 89% and 95%. The overall negative appendectomy rate was 3.7%; and the perforation rate, 21%. CONCLUSION: US is valuable in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. In inconclusive cases, performing additional abdominal CT can improve diagnostic accuracy and thereby decrease the negative appendectomy rate without an increase in the perforation rate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Primary neoplasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings with pathologic comparison.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the computed tomographic (CT) findings in patients with acute appendicitis related to an underlying appendiceal neoplasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic data obtained over a 10-year period in 65 patients with primary appendiceal neoplasms were reviewed. Preoperative CT studies in patients who presented clinically with symptoms of acute appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively and in consensus by three radiologists. The appendix was evaluated on CT scans for morphology, location, presence of calcification, maximal diameter, and wall thickness. RESULTS: Twenty-six (40%) of the 65 patients with appendiceal neoplasms had presented with symptoms of acute appendicitis. Preoperative CT studies available in 22 patients showed increased appendiceal diameter, wall thickening, and periappendiceal fat stranding in 22 (100%), 22 (100%), and 21 (95%) patients, respectively. The appendiceal diameter was greater than 15 mm (mean diameter, 2.9 cm) in 19 patients (86%). Morphologic changes of concern for neoplasm were present in 19 patients (86%) and included cystic dilatation in nine patients and presence of a soft-tissue mass without dilatation in 10 patients. An appendiceal diameter greater than 15 mm and/or a morphologic abnormality were present in 21 of 22 cases (95%). CONCLUSION: CT findings strongly suggest the presence of underlying neoplasm in the majority of patients with secondary appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare low- and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients underwent two unenhanced multi-detector row CT examinations with 4 x 2.5-mm collimation, 120 kVp, and 30 and 100 effective mAs. Two radiologists independently read the images obtained at each dose during two sessions. Readers recorded visualization of the appendix and presence of gas in its lumen, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, cecal wall thickening, and abscess or phlegmon to measure the diameter of the appendix and to propose diagnosis (appendicitis or alternative). Data were compared according to dose and reader, with definite diagnosis established on basis of surgical findings (n = 37) or clinical follow-up. chi(2) tests and logistic regression were used. Measurement agreements were assessed with Cohen kappa statistics. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had a definite diagnosis of appendicitis. No difference was observed between the frequency of visualization of the appendix (P =.874) neither in its mean diameter (P =.101-.696, according to readers and sessions) nor in the readers' overall diagnosis (P =.788) at each dose. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of each sign were not different between doses. Fat stranding, appendicolith, and diameter were the most predictive signs, regardless of dose, yielding approximately 90% of correct diagnoses. The ability to propose a correct alternative diagnosis was not influenced by the dose. CONCLUSION: Low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT has similar diagnostic performance as standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Appendicitis in children: low-dose CT with a phantom-based simulation technique--initial observations.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the accuracy of low-dose (20-mAs) computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children by using a technique that enables the simulation of human CT scans acquired at a lower tube current given the image acquired at a standard dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained, informed consent was not required, and the study was HIPAA compliant. The authors reviewed 100 standard-dose pediatric abdominal-pelvic CT scans (50 positive and 50 negative scans) obtained in 100 patients and corresponding simulated low-dose (20-mAs) scans. The standard-dose scans were obtained for evaluation in patients suspected of having appendicitis. Scans were reviewed in randomized order by four experienced pediatric radiologists. The patients with positive findings included 21 girls (mean age, 9.2 years) and 29 boys (mean age, 8.4 years). The patients with negative findings included 28 girls (mean age, 9.2 years) and 22 boys (mean age, 8.4 years). Simulation was achieved by adding noise patterns from repeated 20-mAs scans of a pediatric pelvis phantom to the original scans obtained with a standard tube current. Observers recorded their confidence in the diagnosis of appendicitis by using a six-point scale. Dose-related changes were analyzed with generalized estimating equations and the nonparametric sign test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant (P < .001, sign test) decrease in both sensitivity and accuracy with a lower tube current, from 91.5% with the original tube current to 77% with the lower tube current. A low dose was the only statistically significant (P < .001) risk factor for a false-negative result. The specificity was unchanged at 94% for both the images obtained with the original tube current and the simulated low-dose images. The overall accuracy decreased from 92% with the original dose to 86% with the low dose. CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings indicate that it is feasible to optimize the CT dose used to evaluate appendicitis in children by using phantom-based computer simulations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Self-localization in US of appendicitis: an addition to graded compression.

Graded-compression ultrasound (US) of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) has been a valuable addition to the diagnostic evaluation of acute appendicitis. In an effort to expedite the sonographic evaluation and improve diagnostic accuracy, a method of self-localization was added to the standard graded-compression examination. A total of 236 patients with signs of appendicitis were studied. Eighty-five percent (121 of 142) of the patients with proved appendicitis were able to decisively self-localize their pain. Of the patients without appendicitis who still had significant disease in the RLQ, 88% (29 of 33) were able to self-localize their pain, with an accuracy rate of 86% for significant disease. Among patients without significant disease, only 15% (nine of 61) self-localized their pain. This "sonographic self-localization sign" reduced the time of the examination and was a valuable addition to standard graded-compression US of the appendix.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of helical computed tomography (CT) without the oral, intravenous, or rectal administration of contrast material in confirming suspected acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred consecutive patients referred from the departments of surgery and emergency medicine were examined for suspected acute appendicitis by using thin-section nonenhanced helical CT. All transverse CT scans were obtained in a single breath hold from the upper abdomen (T12 vertebra) to the pubic symphysis with 5-mm collimation and a pitch of 1.6. All scans were obtained without oral, intravenous, or rectal contrast material. Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (> 6 mm) and periappendiceal inflammation. CT diagnoses were recorded prospectively. Final diagnoses were established with the results of surgical or clinical follow-up or both. RESULTS: There were 110 true-positive diagnoses, 181 true-negative diagnoses (63 of which were an alternative diagnosis correctly established prospectively), five false-negative diagnoses, and four false-positive diagnoses, which yielded a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 97%. CONCLUSION: Nonenhanced helical CT is a highly accurate technique for diagnosing or excluding acute appendicitis. Developing experience with the technique and understanding the subtleties of interpretation can further improve diagnostic accuracy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient.

PURPOSE: To compare 5- and 10-mm computed tomographic (CT) sections in the same patient to diagnose acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During an 11-month period, 100 consecutive patients clinically suspected to have acute appendicitis underwent abdominal and pelvic CT. Helical, 10-mm-collimated sections from the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis and 5-mm-collimated sections through the lower part of the abdomen and upper part of the pelvis were obtained. The 10- and 5-mm sections from each patient were separated into two groups and were interpreted independently by two abdominal imaging attending physicians who were blinded to the final results. The interpretations were correlated with the histopathologic or final clinical diagnoses. RESULTS: Data analysis from blinded reader interpretations of the 5- and 10-mm sections, respectively, revealed sensitivities of 99% and 82% (P <.001), specificities of 98% and 95% (P =.426), and accuracies of 99% and 89% (P <.001). Among the 48 cases of acute appendicitis, abnormal appendices were identified in 94% (n = 45) and 69% (n = 33) (P <.05) on 5- and 10-mm-collimated sections, respectively. Right-lower-quadrant inflammatory changes were identified in 98% (n = 47) and 71% (n = 34) (P <.05) on 5- and 10-mm-collimated sections, respectively. Normal appendices were identified in 75% (n = 39) and 52% (n = 27) of the 52 negative cases on 5- and 10-mm sections (P =.025), respectively. CONCLUSION: Use of thin-section CT significantly improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT--review of 100 cases.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of standard, nonfocused computed tomography (CT) in examining patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain and suspected appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CT scans and medical records of 100 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with RLQ pain and were clinically suspected of having appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. Helical CT of both the abdomen and pelvis was performed at 7-mm increments after oral and intravenous contrast material administration. CT scans were evaluated for the presence of appendiceal or other disease. Results were correlated with surgical and pathologic findings in 34 patients or with 3-month clinical follow-up in 66 patients. RESULTS: CT depicted abnormalities in 66 patients (66%). In 59 (59%) patients, the abnormality was located in the pelvis; 23 (39%) of these patients had appendicitis. Seven (7%) patients had abnormalities outside of the pelvis, a region not typically scanned during focused appendiceal imaging. Four of these seven patients required surgery. Thus, if only pelvic focused RLQ CT had been performed, overall sensitivity would have decreased from 99% to 88% (P <.05) and sensitivity for cases necessitating surgery would have decreased from 96% to 82% (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Both abdominal and pelvic CT examinations are necessary to increase sensitivity and identify the many possible causes of RLQ pain in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1998

Treatment of perforated appendicitis: an analysis of 362 patients treated during 8 years.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: In a retrospective study 2,351 records from patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis during 1986-1993 were analysed. During this period, there were 362 patients with perforated appendicitis. The aim of this study was to analyse the complication rate, the period of antibiotic treatment and whether the complication rate decreased when intravenous treatment was followed by oral antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: The complication frequency was 18% which was significantly higher than that for non-perforated appendicitis of 10%. The complication rate was 15% in the group receiving additional oral antibiotics compared to 19% in the group receiving only intravenous antibiotics. This difference is not significant. CONCLUSION: Perforated appendicitis is however still associated with increased mortality and morbidity.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

The significance of clinical signs and blood indices for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of clinical signs and blood indices for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy. SAMPLE: Of the 40,112 women delivering at our institution (January 1995 to June 2002), 38 women (0.094%) were operated due to the suspicion of appendicitis during pregnancy. METHODS: Body temperature, clinical examination, white blood cell counts and lag time from arrival to operation were obtained for each patient. All women were operated with the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis, and their appendices were removed and examined by a pathologist. RESULTS: Inflammatory appendix was discovered in 19 (0.047%) of the pregnancies with subsequent deliveries while a normal appendix was found in 19 of the 38 (50%) appendices removed. The group with normal appendix did not significantly differ from women with inflamed appendix with regard to gestational age at presentation, signs of peritoneal irritation, body temperature, leukocyte count, time elapsed between arrival and surgery, gestational age at delivery and birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy is a difficult task requiring a very high level of suspicion and clinical skills and not merely relying upon laboratory and classic signs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1991

Intramuscular imipenem as adjuvant therapy for acute cholecystitis and perforated or gangrenous appendicitis.

An open-label prospective study was performed employing intramuscularly administered imipenem as an adjunct to surgery in 20 patients with acute cholecystitis and 24 patients with perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. Three (12.5%) septic failures occurred in appendicitis patients and 2 (10%) failures in cholecystitis patients. There were no deaths. Adverse effects were minor, and there was no toxicity. Although failures were not associated with in vitro resistance, Pseudomonas spp. were recovered from 2 of 3 appendicitis failures. Intramuscular imipenem appeared to be an effective single-drug antimicrobial when used as an adjunct to surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis or perforated appendicitis. It should be a more cost-effective alternative to the current multiple-drug therapy frequently employed in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Systematic quantitative overviews of the literature to determine the value of diagnostic tests for predicting acute appendicitis: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Suspected acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause for emergency operations in visceral surgery worldwide. In approximately twenty percent of all cases however, the diagnosis is incorrect and patients undergo surgery without having acute appendicitis. Operations of bland appendices put patients at risk and entail a serious waste of resources. Several highly accurate tests have been introduced to diagnose acute appendicitis. The false positive rate however, has not changed over the last twenty years. Given the variation that exists in both practice and research, the uncertainty regarding the quality of the underlying evidence, there is a clear need for comprehensive, systematic and quantitative overviews of the diagnostic value of the various tests purported to be predictive of acute appendicitis. METHODS: Literature will be identified searching general bibliographic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE), specialist computer databases (DARE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, conference proceedings, MEDION, SCISEARCH, BIOSIS) without language restrictions. We will contact experts and the manufacturers of tests. Hand-searching will complete our searches. Identified articles will be selected according to populations, tests, outcomes and study design. Papers meeting the selection criteria will be appraised to rate their methodological quality. Analysis will include exploration of heterogeneity in results. We will conduct meta-analyses to generate summary estimates of test accuracy measures and summary ROC curves where appropriate. If meta-analysis is considered to be inappropriate, we will describe the identified evidence in the context of appraised quality. DISCUSSION: These reviews should lead to formulation of recommendations for current practice and future research.

Appendicitis↗
PubMed2006

Length of stay by route of contrast administration for diagnosis of appendicitis by computed-tomography scan.

OBJECTIVES: Studies show equivalent accuracy of abdominal computed tomography (CT) using rectal contrast compared with oral contrast for diagnosing appendicitis. The authors evaluated whether emergency department (ED) length of stay and satisfaction differed by route of contrast administration for abdominal CT. METHODS: This before-and-after intervention evaluated adult patients in an urban academic ED who were undergoing abdominal CT to screen for suspected appendicitis. Phase 1 subjects had a CT after oral contrast. Phase 2 patients had a CT after rectal contrast infused by gravity drip. Patients were interviewed after CT scan to assess satisfaction and discomfort. The primary outcome was ED length of stay. Medians, 95% binomial confidence intervals (CI), and Wilcoxon rank sum test of differences were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were enrolled; half received rectal contrast. There was a significant decrease in length of stay for patients who were administered rectal contrast (261 min, 95% CI = 236 to 305 min) vs. oral contrast (332 min, 95% CI = 299 to 362 min), p = 0.009. Although subjects in the rectal-contrast group waited 65 minutes longer than did oral-contrast patients before receiving contrast after the CT order, the time from contrast administration to CT was 13 minutes, vs. 150 minutes for patients receiving oral contrast (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction and discomfort did not differ by route of contrast administration. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal contrast for patients undergoing abdominal CT to rule out appendicitis reduced ED length of stay by more than an hour and did not affect patient satisfaction or discomfort. Rectal-contrast administration for abdominal CT may significantly shorten patient throughput time for individuals undergoing evaluation for appendicitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Is the incidence of appendicitis reduced in patients with sickle cell disease?

BACKGROUND: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) often present with abdominal pain, usually attributable to vasoocclusion. Experience at a single institution suggested that appendicitis was a rare cause of abdominal symptoms in this population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the incidence of appendicitis was significantly lower in patients with SCD than in the population at large. METHODS: A 17-year retrospective chart review was performed at Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, to determine the approximate incidence of acute appendicitis (AA) in patients with SCD. In addition, we performed a statistical analysis comparing the incidence of AA among SCD patients enrolled in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease with that in the general population. RESULTS: Only two patients with SCD with pathologically confirmed AA were identified among approximately 200 patients followed at our institution during a 17-year period ( approximately 3500 patient-years), yielding an incidence rate of 5.7 cases per 10 000 patient-years. Among 3765 patients with SCD enrolled in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease followed for a mean of 5.3 years (19 886 patient-years), a maximum of 9 cases of AA were identified, yielding an incidence rate of 4.5 cases per 10 000 patient-years. Based on data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey of 1978 to 1981, the incidence rate of AA in the general population (0 to 44 years of age) is approximately 16 per 10 000 patient-years. Paired t test analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference (P < .001) when comparing the incidence of AA among patients enrolled in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease and the population at large. CONCLUSION: AA is an unusual event in patients with SCD. The likelihood of developing appendicitis in SCD patients is less than one third of that for the population at large. Conservative therapy is warranted in the large majority of patients with SCD who present with acute abdominal pain. Surgical exploration is best limited to patients with clear evidence of potential surgical pathology or progressive findings during a period of observation. The biologic basis of our findings remains unknown.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

The effect of hospital volume of pediatric appendectomies on the misdiagnosis of appendicitis in children.

BACKGROUND: Although appendicitis is a common pediatric surgical condition, it is often misdiagnosed. Because higher hospital volume has been associated with improved outcome for many surgical procedures, the current study investigates whether hospital volume of pediatric appendectomies is associated with misdiagnosis of appendicitis in children. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database is a national sample of pediatric discharges from 2521 hospitals in 22 states in 1997. In this study, misdiagnosis was defined as a patient with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure code for nonincidental appendectomy without a corresponding diagnosis code for appendicitis. Hospitals were stratified into 5 groups based on the number of nonincidental appendectomies performed on children in 1997: lowest (<1 per month), low (>or=1 per month but <1 per week), medium (1-2 per week), high (2-3 per week), and highest (>or=3 per week). Using generalized estimating equations to control for clustering within hospitals, we developed a logistic regression model of the effect of hospital volume on misdiagnosis while adjusting for patient age, gender, race, and insurance status. RESULTS: In the database, 37,109 nonincidental appendectomies were performed on children 1 to 18 years old in 1997. Of those, 3103 (8.4%) were misdiagnosed. Of all appendectomies, 24,655 (66.4%) were performed at lowest- or low-volume hospitals. After adjusting for patient characteristics, lowest- (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.2) and low- (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3) volume hospitals had a significantly increased likelihood of misdiagnosis compared with highest-volume hospitals. Misdiagnosis at medium- (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.2) and high- (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 0.9-2.2) volume hospitals was similar to misdiagnosis at lower-volume hospitals, although not statistically different from highest-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Almost two thirds of pediatric appendectomies are performed at hospitals performing <1 pediatric appendectomy per week. Lower hospital volume of pediatric appendectomies is associated with a significantly increased likelihood of misdiagnosis of appendicitis in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Acute ischaemic appendicitis in rabbits: new model with histopathological study].

PURPOSE: To evaluate partial or total ischemia, through ligature with an unabsorbed thread of vessels from the vermiform appendix of rabbits, as well as the mechanical obstruction, through ligature with an unabsorbed thread at the basis of the vermiform appendix, at 1 cm from the cecum, of the acute appendicitis disease. To evaluate the histology of the appendix (normal and affected). To study the bacterium flora resident in the vermiform appendix (normal and affected) and the exudates peritonitis. METHODS: Seventy-two male rabbits (Oryctogalus cuniculus), from New Zealand lineage were used, weighing approximately 3,000 grams. The animals were divided into: pilot (A), bacterium flora (B), control (H) and experimental (C, D, E, F and G) groups, and were observed in periods of 96 and 192 hours. It was done the ligature with an unabsorbed thread of vessels from the meso appendix, and the base of the appendix within 1 cm from the cecal. In the (C) experimental group, the mechanical obstruction was carried out. In the (D, E, F and G) experimental groups, the ischemic model was used, and in the (H) control group, only the surgical simulation was done. RESULTS: In the control group (H), the acute appendicitis didn't happen. In the experimental group (C, D, E, F and G) the acute appendicitis happened. CONCLUSION: The method used causes acute appendicitis with distinct anatomopathological alterations. The main bacteria found at the physiological flora of the enteric juice from the vermiform appendix and at the exudates peritonitis was the Escherichia coli.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The value of unenhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the accuracy of unenhanced CT in the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. DESIGN: Accuracy study, prospective and blinded. SETTING: The University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 52 patients with clinical and laboratorial manifestations of acute appendicitis. CT diagnosis was made by: presence of an abnormal appendix, appendiceal calculi with pericecal phlegmon or alterations in the pericecal appendicular site and absence of signs that may lead to other diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall accuracy, comparing the tomographic aspects with the intra-operative findings and pathological reports ("gold standard"). RESULTS: Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 44 cases. Efficacy was 92%, sensitivity was 91%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and negative predictive value was 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced CT presents a similar overall accuracy to that reported by other authors who studied enhanced CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1985

Fiber intake and childhood appendicitis.

Parents of 135 children with appendicitis and of 212 comparison children were interviewed about their children's diet. Children in the upper two quartiles of fiber intake were estimated to have a 30 per cent lower risk of appendicitis than children in the lowest quartile. Estimated risk of appendicitis decreased as monthly intake of whole-grain foods increased. Children 7 to 18 years of age who had an intake of whole-grain foods in the upper fiftieth percentile were estimated to have a 50 per cent lower risk of appendicitis. This reduction in risk was not observed in the group of children less than 7 years of age.

Adolescent↗