Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Trials”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources

The Midlands Trial of Empirical Amiodarone versus Electrophysiology-guided Interventions and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (MAVERIC): a multi-centre prospective randomised clinical trial on the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

AIMS: MAVERIC was a randomised clinical trial designed to test the possibility of prospectively identifying patients who would benefit most from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) by electrophysiology (EP) study in the context of secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) through comparing EP-guided interventions (anti-arrhythmic drugs, coronary revascularization, and ICD) against empirical amiodarone therapy. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen survivors of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) or SCD were randomized to either treatment strategy, pre-stratified for haemodynamic status at index event, and followed up for a median of 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 106 amiodarone arm patients, 89 (84%) received the drug and 5 (5%) received an ICD after crossing over. Of the 108 EP arm patients, 31 (29%) received an ICD, 46 (43%) received anti-arrhythmic drugs only (mainly amiodarone or sotalol) and 18 (17%) received coronary revascularization but no ICD. No significant differences in survival or arrhythmia recurrence existed between the two treatment arms after 6 years. However, ICD recipients had a lower mortality than non-ICD recipients, regardless of allocated treatment (hazard ratio=0.54, p=0.0391). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective selection of patients to receive the ICD by EP study did not improve survival compared with empirical amiodarone therapy among survivors of VT, VF or SCD, whereas ICD implantation improved survival regardless of allocated treatment. On this basis, routine EP study has no role in the management of such patients, who should be offered empirical ICD therapy according to the results of other secondary prevention ICD trials.

Amiodarone↗

Effectiveness of physical counterpressure maneuvers in preventing vasovagal syncope: the Physical Counterpressure Manoeuvres Trial (PC-Trial).

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of physical counterpressure maneuvers (PCM) in daily life. BACKGROUND: There is presently no evidence-based therapy for vasovagal syncope. Current treatment consists of explanation and life-style advice. Physical counterpressure maneuvers have been shown to raise blood pressure and to control or abort vasovagal episodes in laboratory conditions. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial, which included 223 patients age 38.6 (+/-15.4) years with recurrent vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms. One hundred and seventeen patients were randomized to standardized conventional therapy alone, and 106 patients received conventional therapy plus training in PCM. RESULTS: The median yearly syncope burden during follow-up was significantly lower in the group trained in PCM than in the control group (p = 0.004). During a mean follow-up period of 14 months, overall 50.9% of the patients with conventional treatment and 31.6% of the patients trained in PCM experienced a syncopal recurrence (p = 0.005). Actuarial recurrence-free survival was better in the treatment group (log-rank p = 0.018), resulting in a relative risk reduction of 39% (95% confidence interval, 11% to 53%). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Physical counterpressure maneuvers are a risk-free, effective, and low-cost treatment method in patients with vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms, and should be advised as first-line treatment in patients presenting with vasovagal syncope with prodromal symptoms. (The PC-Trial; http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/45146526/0/45146526.html; ISRCTN45146526).

Actuarial Analysis↗

A randomized trial of tranexamic acid in combination with cell salvage plus a meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating tranexamic acid in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, either when used in combination with mechanical cell salvage or when used alone. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized to either 2 g of tranexamic acid as an intravenous bolus before sternotomy or to placebo. Intraoperative and postoperative cell salvage was used in all patients. The primary end point was early postoperative blood loss (within 4 hours). To evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in isolation, we also performed a meta-analysis of 4 randomized trials identified from a systematic literature search. The primary end point of the meta-analysis was red cell transfusion. RESULTS: In our randomized trial patients in the tranexamic acid group had a significant reduction in early postoperative blood loss, (median difference, 50 mL; 95% confidence interval, 15-100 mL; P < .01); however, there was no reduction in the frequency of blood component transfusion. Patients in the placebo group received a significantly larger volume of autotransfused red cells (median difference, 120 mL; 95% confidence interval, 0-220 mL; P = .02). The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in red cell transfusions in patients receiving tranexamic acid compared with those receiving placebo (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.97; P = .041). There was also a reduction in the frequency of any allogeneic blood component transfusion, as well as a highly significant reduction in postoperative blood loss, in patients receiving tranexamic acid (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A reduction in allogeneic blood transfusion was not evident in the presence of perioperative cell salvage. These data support the routine use of tranexamic acid in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Adult↗

A phase III randomized trial of BAY 12-9566 (tanomastat) as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer responsive to primary surgery and paclitaxel/platinum containing chemotherapy: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

OBJECTIVE: BAY 12-9566 (tanomastat) is a biphenyl matrix metalloprotease inhibitor (MMPI) with antiangiogenic and antimetastatic properties in vivo. The objective of the study was to determine whether the addition of BAY 12-9566 after optimal response to chemotherapy could improve time to progression (TTP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study had received 6-9 cycles of platinum/paclitaxel containing chemotherapy for stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma, with a response of no evidence of disease, or complete or partial response with residual disease < 2 cm. Patients were then randomized to BAY 12-9566 800 mg p.o. b.i.d. or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were quality of life, toxicity, changes in CA 125 levels, response, and overall survival (OS). The total planned sample size was 730. RESULTS: The study was closed after 243 patients had been randomized because of Bayer's decision to close all ongoing trials due to negative results from other phase III trials in pancreatic and small cell lung cancer. The final analysis was performed in August 2000 after the requisite number of events for the first planned interim analysis had occurred; 54% of patients had progressed and 18% had died. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: performance status was ECOG 0/1/2 in 65/33/2%; median age 57 years; 79% of patients were FIGO stage III; 41% were optimally debulked; 76% had serous histology, and 67% had > or = grade 3 histology. Toxicity was generally grade 1 or 2 in severity, with the most common (BAY 12-9566 vs. placebo) being nausea (26% vs. 13%), fatigue (24% vs. 12%), diarrhea (14% vs. 10%), rash (12% vs. 7%), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3% vs. 1%), and grade 3/4 anemia (5% vs. 1%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 10.4 months (8.5-11.5) for BAY 12-9566 and 9.2 months (7.2-13.9) for placebo (P = 0.67). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months (12.9-infinity) for BAY 12-9566 and 11.9 months (10.5-16.5) for placebo (P = 0.53). CONCLUSION: We conclude that BAY 12-9566 was generally well tolerated and at the time of the final analysis, there was no evidence of an impact of BAY 12-9566 on PFS or OS.

Adult↗

Randomized trial of a daily electronic home monitoring system in patients with advanced heart failure: the Weight Monitoring in Heart Failure (WHARF) trial.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure treatment guidelines emphasize daily weight monitoring for patients with heart failure, but data to support this practice are lacking. Using a technology-based heart failure monitoring system, we determined whether daily reporting of weight and symptoms in patients with advanced heart failure would reduce rehospitalization and mortality rates despite aggressive guideline-driven heart failure care. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled trial. Patients hospitalized with New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% were randomized to receive heart failure program care or heart failure program care plus the AlereNet system (Alere Medical, Reno, Nev) and followed-up for 6 months. The primary end point was 6-month hospital readmission rate. Secondary end points included mortality, heart failure hospitalization readmission rate, emergency room visitation rate, and quality of life. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients from 16 heart failure centers across the United States were randomized: 138 received the AlereNet system and 142 received standard care. Mean age was 59 +/- 15 years and 68% were male. The population had very advanced heart failure, New York Heart Association class III (75%) or IV (25%), as evidenced by serum norepinepherine levels, 6-minute walk distance and outcomes. No differences in hospitalization rates were observed. There was a 56.2% reduction in mortality (P <.003) for patients randomized to the AlereNet group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter, randomized trial of a technology-based daily weight and symptom-monitoring system for patients with advanced heart failure. Despite no difference in the primary end point of rehospitalization rates, mortality was significantly reduced for patients randomized to the AlereNet system without an increase in utilization, despite specialized and aggressive heart failure care in both groups.

Body Weight↗

A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: The Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST).

This trial evaluated the effects of epoprostenol on patients with severe left ventricular failure. Patients with class IIIB/IV congestive heart failure and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction were eligible for enrollment if angiography documented severely compromised hemodynamics while the patient was receiving a regimen of digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. We randomly assigned 471 patients to epoprostenol infusion or standard care. The primary end point was survival; secondary end points were clinical events, congestive heart failure symptoms, distance walked in 6 minutes, and quality-of-life measures. The median dose of epoprostenol was 4.0 ng/kg/min, resulting in a significant increase in cardiac index (1.81 to 2.61 L/min/m2), a decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (24.5 to 20.0 mm Hg), and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (20.76 to 12.33 units). The trial was terminated early because of a strong trend toward decreased survival in the patients treated with epoprostenol. Chronic intravenous epoprostenol therapy is not associated with improvement in distance walked, quality of life, or morbid events and is associated with an increased risk of death.

Aged↗

Use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the United States, Europe, and Canada. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) and Canadian Coronary Atherectomy Trial (CCAT) investigators.

The objective of this study was to examine whether there are international variations in the use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. We analyzed the medical therapy of patients in the United States (US) (n = 878), Europe (n = 134), and Canada (n = 274) who underwent percutaneous coronary revascularization in either the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) (enrollment from August 1991 to April 1992) or the Canadian Coronary Atherectomy Trial (CCAT) (enrollment from July 1991 to August 1992). We found that at the time of hospital admission, Canadian patients had the highest rates of treatment with aspirin (95% vs 57% US and 78% Europe; p = 0.002), calcium antagonists (75% vs 48% US and 43% Europe; p 0.0001), beta blockers (60% vs 32% US and 46% Europe; p = 0.02), and combination anti-ischemic therapy (67% vs 43% US and 56% Europe; p = 0.0001). By discharge, however, Canadian patients had the lowest rates of treatment with nitrates (12% vs 40% US and 44% Europe; p = 0.0001) and combination anti-ischemic therapy (29% vs 53% US and 47% Europe; p < 0.01). At both admission and discharge, rates of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and lipid-lowering agents were < 15% in all 3 regions. We conclude that significant international variations exist in the use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Effect of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade on activated clotting time during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy (the EPIC trial). Evaluation of c7E3 Fab in the Prevention of Ischemic Complications trial.

The activated clotting time (ACT) has been used during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to monitor the extent of thrombin inhibition and anti-coagulation from heparin in an attempt to minimize untoward thrombotic events and hemorrhagic complications. With the introduction of potent platelet inhibitors, such as the chimeric monoclonal antibody c7E3, to interventional cardiology, the utility of measuring and regulating procedural ACT has not been examined. To investigate the possible influence of platelet IIb/IIIa antagonism on procedural ACT, we reviewed data from the Evaluation of c7E3 Fab in the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC) trial. In the EPIC trial, 2,099 patients undergoing PTCA with a high risk of abrupt vessel closure were randomized to receive placebo (n = 696) or the IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist c7E3 Fab (n = 1,403). Despite receiving less procedural heparin, and fewer patients receiving very high heparin doses (> 14,000 U) than the placebo group, those receiving c7E3 had a higher mean (401 vs 367 seconds, p < 0.001) ACT when corrected for body weight. The ACT is increased approximately 35 seconds by the platelet IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist c7E3 Fab. This has important implications for dosing conjunctive heparin therapy and performing PTCA or directional coronary atherectomy in the setting of IIb/IIIa-directed therapy.

Abciximab↗

Methodology of clinical trials focusing on the PC-Fix clinical trials.

Once development and mechanical and biological laboratory testing have been completed, new technologies to be used in orthopaedic and trauma surgery must be investigated in humans before they can be used routinely. Prospective clinical investigations with or without randomization to standard treatments conducted according to the current standards and guidelines for Good Clinical Practice must be performed to prove the safety and efficacy of the new device. Furthermore, these tests serve to determine the specific indications, contraindications, tips and tricks as well as the pitfalls and how to avoid them. Last, but not least, the study must result in improved teaching of the use of the device and in improved follow-up of patients. The basis of every conclusion drawn from such a study is the complete documentation of each single use of the new device. We present the modalities and methodology for conducting a prospective clinical multicentre investigation in trauma surgery, focusing on the clinical trials carried out on the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix), a device for the internal fixation of long bone fractures developed as part of the scientific evolution towards the Less Invasive Stabilization Systems (LISS) now being introduced into clinical practice. Four prospective multicentre clinical investigations with an overall number of 1,229 PC-Fixators implanted from October 1993 to May 1998 were performed. To our knowledge this is the largest prospective series ever reported in orthopaedic trauma surgery to test a new device before market introduction. Due to a special documentation and implant replacement procedure, every PC-Fix implantation was documented. Very few patients were lost to long-term follow-up due to the personal commitment of the study monitors. Regular personal visits of the study monitor to the investigating hospitals and close communication between the surgeons, the engineers responsible for development, the study monitor, and the study sponsor meant that problems were identified and dealt with professionally without compromising the health of the patient. Case report forms were concise and had to be transmitted without delay. Handling of radiographs has become easier thanks to the transmission of digital images to the study centre via the internet. There are some aspects specific to trauma surgery which require special consideration and planning is essential, but clinical trials can be performed effectively.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Multicenter clinical trial for evaluating methylprednisolone pulse treatment of idiopathic optic neuritis in Japan. Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial Multicenter Cooperative Research Group (ONMRG).

BACKGROUND: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 1991 to compare an intravenous megadose of methylprednisolone with a control drug (mecobalamin) for treating acute idiopathic optic neuritis. CASES: Sixty-six cases from 22 clinical centers throughout Japan were examined to evaluate the treatment on visual function parameters, such as visual acuity, visual field, color vision, contrast sensitivity, and critical flicker frequency. OBSERVATIONS: The methylprednisolone pulse treatment group showed faster recovery of visual function, particularly the visual acuity at 1 week (P<.05), Humphrey field analyzer mean deviation at 3 weeks (P<.05), and color vision at 1 week (P<.05). Recovery of contrast sensitivity at several different spatial frequencies was significant in the pulse treatment group at 1 (P<.01), 2 (P<.05), and 4 weeks (P<.05) after the start of treatment. Visual function test results at 12 weeks and 1 year were essentially the same in the two treatment groups. Side effects appeared more frequently in the pulse treatment group than in the control (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pulse treatment does not appear effective for idiopathic optic neuritis even though visual function in the pulse treatment group of this trial recovered more quickly during the initial phase compared to the controls. More effective and specific treatment should be established for optic neuritis.

Adolescent↗

Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial has demonstrated that intensive diabetes treatment delays the onset and slows the progression of diabetic complications in subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus from 13 to 39 years of age. We examined whether the effects of such treatment also occurred in the subset of young diabetic subjects (13 to 17 years of age at entry) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. One hundred twenty-five adolescent subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus but with no retinopathy at baseline (primary prevention cohort) and 70 adolescent subjects with mild retinopathy (secondary intervention cohort) were randomly assigned to receive either (1) intensive therapy with an external insulin pump or at least three daily insulin injections, together with frequent daily blood-glucose monitoring, or (2) conventional therapy with one or two daily insulin injections and once-daily monitoring. Subjects were followed for a mean of 7.4 years (4 to 9 years). In the primary prevention cohort, intensive therapy decreased the risk of having retinopathy by 53% (95% confidence interval: 1% to 78%; p = 0.048) in comparison with conventional therapy. In the secondary intervention cohort, intensive therapy decreased the risk of retinopathy progression by 70% (95% confidence interval: 25% to 88%; p = 0.010) and the occurrence of microalbuminuria by 55% (95% confidence interval: 3% to 79%; p = 0.042). Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities were faster in intensively treated subjects. The major adverse event with intensive therapy was a nearly threefold increase of severe hypoglycemia. We conclude that intensive therapy effectively delays the onset and slows the progression of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy when initiated in adolescent subjects; the benefits outweigh the increased risk of hypoglycemia that accompanies such treatment.

Adolescent↗

The results of CAPRIE, IST and CAST. Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events. International Stroke Trial. Chinese Acute Stroke Trial.

The role of aspirin in the secondary prevention of ischaemic events is being challenged. CAPRIE, a blinded multicenter randomized trial of over 19,000 patients followed for 1-3 years, assessed the effect of clopidogrel in the secondary prevention of major vascular events. Patients with a recent myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral arterial disease were randomized to treatment with clopidogrel or aspirin. Clopidogrel was associated with a statistically significant, overall 8.7%, relative reduction in the risk of ischaemic events, but the direction and size of the effect was not homogeneous with respect to three predefined clinical subgroups. Clopidogrel may be slightly better in preventing major ischaemic events in high-risk patients, but the results of CAPRIE suggest that there is room for doubt. It remains to be seen whether treatment with clopidogrel is cost-effective compared with aspirin. However, aspirin may still be of value in the early treatment of acute stroke. IST was a 20,000 patient, randomized, open-label study of aspirin plus heparin or neither in patients with acute ischaemic stroke that should be treated in 48 hours. There was a small but statistically nonsignificant reduction in mortality and disability at 6 months for patients allocated to early treatment with aspirin compared with those who were scheduled to avoid aspirin in the first 2 weeks after the stroke. Similar results were seen in CAST, a double-blind trial of aspirin vs. placebo in patients with suspected ischaemic stroke treated within 48 hours. A meta-analysis of the results of IST, CAST and MAST-I showed a statistically significant effect of early aspirin treatment. The role of aspirin in the treatment of acute stroke within 48 hours appears to be established.

Aspirin↗

Effect of sibutramine on weight maintenance after weight loss: a randomised trial. STORM Study Group. Sibutramine Trial of Obesity Reduction and Maintenance.

BACKGROUND: Sibutramine is a tertiary amine that has been shown to induce dose-dependent weight loss and to enhance the effects of a low-calorie diet for up to a year. We did a randomised, double-blind trial to assess the usefulness of sibutramine in maintaining substantial weight loss over 2 years. METHODS: Eight European centres recruited 605 obese patients (body-mass index 30-45 kg/m2) for a 6-month period of weight loss with sibutramine (10 mg/day) and an individualised 600 kcal/day deficit programme based on measured resting metabolic rates. 467 (77%) patients with more than 5% weight loss were then randomly assigned 10 mg/day sibutramine (n=352) or placebo (n=115) for a further 18 months. Sibutramine was increased up to 20 mg/day if weight regain occurred. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients at year 2 maintaining at least 80% of the weight lost between baseline and month 6. Secondary outcomes included changes in uric acid concentrations and glycaemic and lipid variables. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 148 (42%) individuals in the sibutramine group and 58 (50%) in the placebo group dropped out. Of the 204 sibutramine-treated individuals who completed the trial, 89 (43%) maintained 80% or more of their original weight loss, compared with nine (16%) of the 57 individuals in the placebo group (odds ratio 4.64, p<0.001). Patients had substantial decreases over the first 6 months with respect to triglycerides, VLDL cholesterol, insulin, C peptide, and uric acid; these changes were sustained in the sibutramine group but not the placebo group. HDL cholesterol concentrations rose substantially in the second year: overall increases were 20.7% (sibutramine) and 11.7% (placebo, p<0.001). 20 (3%) patients were withdrawn because of increases in blood pressure; in the sibutramine group, systolic blood pressure rose from baseline to 2 years by 0.1 mm Hg (SD 12.9), diastolic blood pressure by 2.3 mm Hg (9.4), and pulse rate by 4.1 beats/min (11.9). INTERPRETATION: This individualised management programme achieved weight loss in 77% of obese patients and sustained weight loss in most patients continuing therapy for 2 years. Changes in concentrations of HDL cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, and triglyceride, but not LDL cholesterol, exceed those expected either from weight loss alone or when induced by other selective therapies for low concentrations of HDL cholesterol relating to coronary heart disease.

Adolescent↗

Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose dopamine is commonly administered to critically ill patients in the belief that it reduces the risk of renal failure by increasing renal blood flow. However, these effects have not been established in a large randomised controlled trial, and use of dopamine remains controversial. We have done a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of low-dose dopamine in patients with at least two criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and clinical evidence of early renal dysfunction (oliguria or increase in serum creatinine concentration). METHODS: 328 patients admitted to 23 participating intensive-care units (ICUs) were randomly assigned a continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose dopamine (2 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) or placebo administered through a central venous catheter while in the ICU. The primary endpoint was the peak serum creatinine concentration during the infusion. Analyses excluded four patients with major protocol violations. FINDINGS: The groups assigned dopamine (n=161) and placebo (n=163) were similar in terms of baseline characteristics, renal function, and duration of trial infusion. There was no difference between the dopamine and placebo groups in peak serum creatinine concentration during treatment (245 [SD 144] vs 249 [147] micromol/L; p=0.93), in the increase from baseline to highest value during treatment (62 [107] vs 66 [108] micromol/L; p=0.82), or in the numbers of patients whose serum creatinine concentration exceeded 300 micromol/L (56 vs 56; p=0.92) or who required renal replacement therapy (35 vs 40; p=0.55). Durations of ICU stay (13 [14] vs 14 [15] days; p=0.67) and of hospital stay (29 [27] vs 33 [39] days; p=0.29) were also similar. There were 69 deaths in the dopamine group and 66 in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Administration of low-dose dopamine by continuous intravenous infusion to critically ill patients at risk of renal failure does not confer clinically significant protection from renal dysfunction.

Analysis of Variance↗

Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Since previous randomised treatment trials in coronary disease have focused on patients younger than 75 years of age, their findings might not apply to the elderly population in whom the cardiac risk profile, risk of intervention, and comorbidities are increased. We aimed to assess quality of life and outcome of elderly patients with coronary disease after medical or revascularisation therapy. METHODS: In this randomised, prospective, multicentre trial, we enrolled patients aged 75 years or older with chronic angina of at least Canadian Cardiac Society class II despite at least two antianginal drugs. Patients were randomly assigned coronary angiography and revascularisation or optimised medical therapy. The primary endpoint was quality of life after 6 months, as assessed by questionnaire and the presence of major adverse cardiac events (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome with or without the need for revascularisation). Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 150 patients were assigned medical therapy and 155 invasive therapy. Two protocol violators in each group were not included in the analysis. After 6 months, angina severity decreased and measures of quality of life increased in both treatment groups; however, these improvements were significantly greater after revascularisation. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 72 (49%) of patients in the medical group and 29 (19%) in the invasive group (p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: Patients aged 75 years or older with angina despite standard drug therapy benefit more from revascularisation than from optimised medical therapy in terms of symptom relief and quality of life. Therefore, these patients should be offered invasive assessment despite their high risk profile followed by revascularisation if feasible.

Aged↗

Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Results of trials, comparing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), indicate that rates of death or myocardial infarction are similar with either treatment strategy. Management with PTCA is, however, associated with an increased requirement for subsequent, additional revascularisation. Coronary stents, used as an adjunct to PTCA, reduce restenosis and the need for repeat revascularisation. The aim of the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial was to assess the effect of stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus CABG in the management of patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: In 53 centres in Europe and Canada, symptomatic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomised to CABG (n=500) or stent-assisted PCI (n=488). The primary outcome measure was a comparison of the rates of repeat revascularisation. Secondary outcomes included death or Q-wave myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1 year and the results are expressed for the median follow-up of 2 years. 21% (n=101) of patients in the PCI group required additional revascularisation procedures compared with 6% (n=30) in the CABG group (hazard ratio 3.85, 95% CI 2.56-5.79, p<0.0001). The incidence of death or Q-wave myocardial infarction was similar in both groups (PCI 9% [n=46], CABG 10% [n=49]; hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.63-1.42, p=0.80). There were fewer deaths in the CABG group than in the PCI group (PCI 5% [n=22], CABG 2% [n=8]; hazard ratio 2.91, 95% CI 1.29-6.53, p=0.01). INTERPRETATION: The use of coronary stents has reduced the need for repeat revascularisation when compared with previous studies that used balloon angioplasty, though the rate remains significantly higher than in patients managed with CABG. The apparent reduction in mortality with CABG requires further investigation.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Reduction of postoperative chemotherapy in children with stage I intermediate-risk and anaplastic Wilms' tumour (SIOP 93-01 trial): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Present treatment for Wilms' tumour is very successful. Now, efforts are aimed at reducing toxicity and burden of treatment by shortening schedules without loss of effectiveness. The objective of this randomised trial was to assess whether postoperative chemotherapy for patients with stage I intermediate-risk and anaplastic Wilms' tumour could be shortened to only 4 weeks from the standard 18 weeks, while maintaining equivalent event-free survival. METHODS: Between June, 1993, and June, 2000, 410 patients were randomly assigned after four doses of vincristine plus one course of dactinomycin postoperatively either to stop further adjuvant chemotherapy (no further chemotherapy group, n=200), or to receive a further two courses of the same chemotherapy (standard group, n=210). Previous treatment consisted of chemotherapy before nephrectomy of four doses of vincristine and two courses of dactinomycin followed by surgical resection of the tumour. Eligible patients were at least 6 months old and had stage I tumours with either intermediate-risk histology or anaplasia. The primary endpoint of this equivalence trial was 2-year event-free survival. Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were done. FINDINGS: By 2 years, 18 recurrences were reported in the standard group, and 22 in the no further chemotherapy group. Event-free survival was 91.4% (95% CI 87.5-95.2) for the no further chemotherapy group and 88.8% (84.3-93.2) for the standard group (difference=2.6%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 8.4%). The null hypothesis, that experimental treatment is less effective than standard treatment, could be rejected (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Shortening duration of chemotherapy could reduce acute and late side-effects and inconvenience for patient and parents while maintaining effectiveness, and could be beneficial in terms of health costs.

Adolescent↗

Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 20% of all stroke-related sudden neurological deficits, has the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke, and the role of surgery remains controversial. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to compare early surgery with initial conservative treatment for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: A parallel-group trial design was used. Early surgery combined haematoma evacuation (within 24 h of randomisation) with medical treatment. Initial conservative treatment used medical treatment, although later evacuation was allowed if necessary. We used the eight-point Glasgow outcome scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months follow-up as the primary outcome measure. We divided the patients into good and poor prognosis groups on the basis of their clinical status at randomisation. For the good prognosis group, a favourable outcome was defined as good recovery or moderate disability on the Glasgow outcome scale. For the poor prognosis group, a favourable outcome also included the upper level of severe disability. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 1033 patients from 83 centres in 27 countries were randomised to early surgery (503) or initial conservative treatment (530). At 6 months, 51 patients were lost to follow-up, and 17 were alive with unknown status. Of 468 patients randomised to early surgery, 122 (26%) had a favourable outcome compared with 118 (24%) of 496 randomised to initial conservative treatment (odds ratio 0.89 [95% CI 0.66-1.19], p=0.414); absolute benefit 2.3% (-3.2 to 7.7), relative benefit 10% (-13 to 33). INTERPRETATION: Patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage in neurosurgical units show no overall benefit from early surgery when compared with initial conservative treatment.

Aged↗