Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources

Wnt-mediated down-regulation of Sp1 target genes by a transcriptional repressor Sp5.

Wnt/beta-catenin signaling regulates many processes during vertebrate development. To study transcriptional targets of canonical Wnt signaling, we used the conditional Cre/loxP system in mouse to ectopically activate beta-catenin during central nervous system development. We show that the activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the embryonic mouse telencephalon results in the up-regulation of Sp5 gene, which encodes a member of the Sp1 transcription factor family. A proximal promoter of Sp5 gene is highly evolutionarily conserved and contains five TCF/LEF binding sites that mediate direct regulation of Sp5 expression by canonical Wnt signaling. We provide evidence that Sp5 works as a transcriptional repressor and has three independent repressor domains, called R1, R2, and R3, respectively. Furthermore, we show that the repression activity of R1 domain is mediated through direct interaction with a transcriptional corepressor mSin3a. Finally, our data strongly suggest that Sp5 has the same DNA binding specificity as Sp1 and represses Sp1 target genes such as p21. We conclude that Sp5 transcription factor mediates the downstream responses to Wnt/beta-catenin signaling by directly repressing Sp1 target genes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The N-terminal region of the adenovirus type 5 E1A proteins can repress expression of cellular genes via two distinct but overlapping domains.

The transforming E1A 12S and E1A 13S proteins of human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) contain two and three conserved regions, respectively. In the present study, the contribution of sequences in the nonconserved N-terminal region of the E1A proteins to morphological transformation and to down-regulation of a number of mitogen-inducible genes was investigated. As described previously, transformation of NRK cells (an established normal rat kidney cell line) results in denser cell growth and a cuboidal cellular morphology. None of the cells expressing N-terminally mutated E1A proteins, however, show these transformed properties, which suggests an important role for sequences in that domain. The decrease in cyclin D1 levels requires exactly the same sequences. The ability to transform NRK cells and to reduce cyclin D1 levels does not correlate with the presence in the E1A proteins of binding domains for p300, CBP, p107, pRb, cyclin A, or cdk2. In contrast, down-regulation of expression of the JE gene in NRK cells and repression of transcription of the collagenase gene in human HeLa cells does correlate with the presence in the E1A proteins of an intact binding domain for p300 and CBP. The results suggest that the N-terminal domain of the E1A proteins can repress expression of cellular genes by at least two different mechanisms.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗

Analysis of mechanisms that determine dominant negative estrogen receptor effectiveness.

To analyze the mechanisms by which estrogen receptor (ER) activity is suppressed by dominant negative mutants, we examined the role of specific ER functions and domains in transcriptional repression. We previously described three transcriptionally inactive human ER mutants (the frameshift mutant S554fs, the point mutant L540Q, and the truncated receptor ER1-530), which act as effective dominant negative mutants, inhibiting the activity of wild type ER when they are coexpressed in mammalian cells. After additional mutational modifications, the ability of the ER mutants to suppress the activity of wild type ER was analyzed in cotransfection assays of the dominant negative mutants and wild type ER and an estrogen-responsive reporter gene (2ERE-TATA-CAT or 2ERE-pS2-CAT). Eliminating the ability of the three dominant negative mutants to bind to estrogen response element (ERE) DNA (by introducing three point mutations in their DNA binding domains) dramatically reduced, but did not completely abolish, the dominant negative activity of the ER mutants. The mutation G521R, which rendered the three mutants incapable of binding estradiol, also reduced, but did not abolish, their dominant negative activity. Immunoprecipitation with monoclonal or flag antibodies followed by Western blotting demonstrated that each of the original dominant negative ER mutants formed heterodimers with wild type ER. Rendering the dominant negative mutants dimerization deficient by the mutation L507R strongly reduced, but did not eliminate, their dominant negative activity. Deletion of the N-terminal A/B domain resulted in the nearly complete loss of inhibitory activity of the three dominant negative mutants. However, these double mutants retained their ability to heterodimerize with wild type ER, suggesting that dominant negative interference also occurs at an additional step beyond dimerization. Our data indicate that competition for ERE binding, formation of inactive heterodimers, and specific transcriptional silencing can all contribute to the dominant negative phenotype and that these receptors suppress the activity of wild type ER by acting at multiple steps in the ER-response pathway.

Animals↗

Association of specific DNA binding and transcriptional repression with the transforming and myogenic activities of c-Ski.

The ski oncogene encodes a transcription factor that induces both transformation and muscle differentiation in avian fibroblasts. The first 304 amino acids of chicken Ski, the transformation domain, are both necessary and sufficient to mediate these biological activities. Ski's biological duality is mirrored by its transcriptional activities: it coactivates or corepresses transcription depending on its interactions with other transcription factors. Ski represses transcription through specific binding to GTCTAGAC (GTCT element) but it possesses a transferable repression activity that can function independently of this DNA element. In this study, we locate this repression domain to the NH2-terminal two-thirds and the GTCT binding region to the COOH-terminal one-third of Ski's transformation domain. Mutations in the transformation domain of c-Ski reveal a strong correlation between GTCT-mediated transcriptional repression and the biological activities of transformation and myogenesis. We also show that a dimerization domain located at the COOH terminal end of the Ski protein increases its transforming activity and its binding to GTCTAGAC.

Animals↗

Transcriptional repression by COUP-TF II is dependent on the C-terminal domain and involves the N-CoR variant, RIP13delta1.

COUP-TF II/ARP-1 is an 'orphan' steroid receptor that inhibits basal transcription, and represses trans-activation by the vitamin D, thyroid hormone and retinoid receptors. The molecular basis of repression by COUP-TF II remains obscure. In this study we utilized the GAL4 hybrid system to demonstrate that COUP-TF II contains sequences within the C-terminal region that encode a dominant transcriptional repressor that inhibits the ability of the potent chimeric transactivator GAL4VP16 to induce transcription. Mammalian two hybrid analysis demonstrated that COUP-TF II did not efficiently interact with either interaction domains I or II from N-CoR and RIP13. However, COUP-TF II efficiently interacts with a region comprised of interaction domains I + II from the corepressor, RIP13delta1. Efficient interaction of the orphan receptor with the corepressor was critically dependent on a large region comprised of the C, D and E domains of COUP-TF II, which correlated with the domain that maximally represses transcription. This investigation suggested that the N-CoR variant, RIP13delta1 interacts with a region of COUP-TF II that functions as a dominant transcriptional repressor.

8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate↗

A novel chromosomal inversion at 11q23 in infant acute myeloid leukemia fuses MLL to CALM, a gene that encodes a clathrin assembly protein.

Rearrangements involving the MLL gene at chromosome band 11q23 are common in infant acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs). We recently encountered an infant patient with rapidly progressive AML whose leukemic cells harbored a previously undescribed MLL rearrangement involving an inversion of 11q [inv(11)(q14q23)]. We used panhandle PCR to determine that this rearrangement juxtaposed the MLL (Mixed-Lineage Leukemia) gene to the CALM (Clathrin Assembly Lymphoid Myeloid leukemia) gene at 11q14-q21. The CALM protein participates in recruitment of clathrin to internal membrane surfaces, thereby regulating vesicle formation in both endocytosis and intracellular protein transport. Intriguingly, CALM has been identified in other cases of AML as a translocation partner for the AF10 gene, which has independently been found to be an MLL partner in AML. We identified the MLL-CALM fusion transcript (but not the reciprocal CALM-MLL transcript) in leukemia cell RNA by RT-PCR. The predicted 1803 amino acid MLL-CALM fusion protein includes amino-terminal MLL domains involved in transcriptional repression, and carboxy-terminal CALM-derived clathrin-binding domains. The genomic breakpoint in MLL is in the 7th intron (within the breakpoint cluster region); the corresponding CALM breakpoint is in the 7th CALM intron. In contrast, breakpoints in CALM-AF10 translocations lie in the 17th-19th CALM introns (30 kb downstream); also, in these translocations, CALM provides the 5' end of the fusion transcript. Together with its previously recognized association with AF10 in AML, the identification of CALM as an MLL fusion partner suggests that interference with clathrin-mediated trafficking pathways may be an underappreciated mechanism in leukemogenesis.

Acute Disease↗

Gain-of-function mutation in ADULT syndrome reveals the presence of a second transactivation domain in p63.

The transcriptional co-activator p63 is of crucial importance for correct development of the limbs, ectodermal appendages (skin, nails, teeth, hair, glands), lip and palate. Mutations in the p63 gene are found in a number of human syndromes, including ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-cleft lip/palate (EEC) syndrome, limb-mammary syndrome (LMS), Hay-Wells syndrome and in non-syndromic split-hand/split-foot malformation (SHFM). Each syndrome has a specific pattern of mutations with different functional effects in in vitro functional assays. We report a mutation R298Q in acro-dermato-ungual-lacrimal-tooth (ADULT) syndrome, another EEC-like condition. The mutation is located in the DNA binding domain of p63, which harbors almost all EEC associated mutations. However, unlike mutations in EEC syndrome, the R298Q ADULT syndrome mutation does not impair DNA binding. Rather, the mutation confers novel transcription activation capacity on the DeltaN-p63gamma isoform, which normally does not possess such activity. These results confirm that ADULT syndrome is a clinically as well as molecularly distinct member of the expanding p63 mutation family of human malformation syndromes. Our results further show that p63 contains a second transactivation domain which is normally repressed and can become activated by mutations in the DNA binding domain of p63.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

Adjacent proline residues in the inhibitory domain of the Oct-2 transcription factor play distinct functional roles.

A 40 amino acid region of Oct-2 from amino acids 142 to 181 functions as an active repressor domain capable of inhibiting both basal activity and activation of promoters containing a TATA box, but not of those that contain an initiator element. Based on our observation that the equivalent region of the closely related Oct-1 factor does not act as an inhibitory domain, we have mutated specific residues in the Oct-2 domain in an attempt to probe their importance in repressor domain function. Although mutations of several residues have no or minimal effect, mutation of proline 175 to arginine abolishes the ability to inhibit both basal and activated transcription. In contrast, mutation of proline 174 to arginine confers upon the domain the ability to repress activation of an initiator-containing promoter by acidic activation domains, and also suppresses the effect of the proline 175 mutation. Hence, adjacent proline residues play key roles in the functioning of the inhibitory domain and in limiting its specificity to TATA-box-containing promoters.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-encoded latency-associated nuclear antigen modulates K1 expression through its cis-acting elements within the terminal repeats.

K1 is the first open reading frame encoded by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and lies positionally to the immediate right of the terminal repeats. K1 is a transmembrane glycoprotein having a functional immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) capable of activating B-cell receptor signaling. K1 is expressed mostly during the lytic cycle of the virus and its promoter lies within the terminal repeat which contains the binding sites for latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA). The K1 promoter (K1p) having LANA binding sites assayed by reporter assay demonstrated that LANA is capable of down-regulating K1 promoter transcriptional activity. However, the KSHV replication transcription activator RTA up-regulates K1p transcriptional activity. The promoter deleted of LANA binding sites showed loss in LANA-mediated down-regulation but was unaffected for RTA-mediated up-regulation. Increasing amounts of RTA rescued LANA-mediated repression of K1p transcriptional activity in cotransfection experiments. Reporter assay data suggest that LANA binding to its cognate sequence is critical for LANA-mediated repression of K1p as a LANA construct lacking the DNA binding domain was unable to repress K1p transcription. Additionally, KSHV primary infection experiments suggest that K1 is expressed during early infection but is repressed on the establishment of latency and so follows an expression profile similar to that of RTA during infection. Analysis of the promoter sequence revealed the presence of Oct-1 transcription factor binding sites within the -116 to +76 region. Mutational analysis of the Oct-1 sites abolished RTA-mediated transcriptional activation, suggesting that RTA up-regulates K1p transcription through binding to this transcription factor.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Evidence that the conserved region in the steroid binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor is required for both optimal binding of hsp90 and protection from proteolytic cleavage. A two-site model for hsp90 binding to the steroid binding domain.

Steroid hormone receptors contain a conserved sequence of amino acids within the steroid binding domain, and we have previously speculated that this conserved region is the site of interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with hsp90 (Danielsen, M., Northrop, J. P., and Ringold, G. M. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2513-2522; Pratt, W. B., Jolly, D. J., Pratt, D. V., Hollenberg, S. M., Giguere, V., Cadepond, F. M., Schweizer-Groyer, G., Catelli, M.-G., Evans, R. M., and Baulieu, E.-E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 267-273). In this work, we transfect COS-7 cells with three mutants of the mouse glucocorticoid receptor deleted for all or part of this conserved region. The mutant receptor missing the entire conserved region is very unstable and is found predominantly as cleavage products. Approximately one-third of the cleavage products have lost most or all of the steroid binding domain. This mutant receptor has a constitutive activity that is about one-third that of the steroid-bound wild type receptor in stimulating transcription from a reporter gene. We propose that the partial constitutive activity results from proteolytic cleavage of the steroid binding domain from the rest of the receptor, thus removing the functional repression determined by this domain. This mutant receptor is associated with hsp90 in cytosols prepared in the presence of molybdate but, when molybdate is not present, the receptor is unstable and there is very little receptor-associated hsp90. This observation is consistent with the proposal that binding of hsp90 helps to stabilize the glucocorticoid receptor against proteolysis, and it demonstrates that the site of molybdate interaction with the receptor lies outside of the conserved sequence. Our data are interpreted according to a two-site model in which hsp90 interacts with the steroid binding domain at two sites. One site is in the conserved sequence, and the other is at a transition metal oxyanion binding site, located between the conserved sequence and the COOH terminus.

Animals↗

Mutational analysis of the Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase alpha C-terminal domain supports the interference model of Spx-dependent repression.

The Spx protein of Bacillus subtilis exerts both positive and negative transcriptional control in response to oxidative stress by interacting with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) alpha subunit (alphaCTD). Thus, transcription of the srf operon at the onset of competence development, which requires the ComA response regulator of the ComPA signal transduction system, is repressed by Spx-alphaCTD interaction. Previous genetic and structural analyses have determined that an Spx-binding surface resides in and around the alpha1 region of alphaCTD. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of B. subtilis alphaCTD uncovered residue positions required for Spx function and ComA-dependent srf transcriptional activation. Analysis of srf-lacZ fusion expression, DNase I footprinting, and solid-phase promoter retention experiments indicate that Spx interferes with ComA-alphaCTD interaction and that residues Y263, C265, and K267 of the alpha1 region lie within overlapping ComA- and Spx-binding sites for alphaCTD interaction. Evidence is also presented that oxidized Spx, while enhancing interference of activator-RNAP interaction, is not essential for negative control.

Alleles↗

The BmE75 nuclear receptors function as dominant repressors of the nuclear receptor BmHR3A.

The orphan nuclear receptors BmE75 and BmHR3 are induced by 20-hydroxyecdysone in the ovary of the silk moth Bombyx mori at the beginning of pupation and show stage-specific expression in ovarian follicles during pharate adult development. To analyze the function of these receptors, we have developed a transactivation assay based on the transcriptional stimulation of a retinoic acid receptor-related receptor response element (RORE)-linked promoter-reporter construct. Co-transfection of a Bombyx cell line with a BmHR3A expression construct results in constitutive activation of the reporter, whereas expression of BmE75 has no measurable effects on reporter expression. However, when the BmE75 receptors are co-introduced with BmHR3A into the cells, the BmHR3A-mediated transactivation is repressed. Repression of BmHR3A by BmE75 occurs by two distinct mechanisms. Increasing doses of BmE75 efficiently displace BmHR3A bound to the RORE target site in gel retardation assays, indicating that both receptors compete for common DNA target sites. However, analysis of the function of deletion mutants of BmE75 in the transactivation assay indicates that repression can also occur in the absence of the DNA-binding domain and that the C-terminal F domain is sufficient for repression. In gel retardation assays, the two receptor types form a ternary complex on a single RORE, suggesting that repression is also mediated by protein interactions on the DNA target site. Yeast two-hybrid assays show that BmHR3A interacts with BmE75 and that this interaction is dependent on the C terminus of BmHR3A and the F domain of BmE75. Because the C terminus of BmHR3A contains a strong activation domain, we predict that BmE75 blocks activation by BmHR3A through competition for co-activator binding sites located at the C terminus of BmHR3A. Our data also indicate that the transcriptional activities of BmHR3A and BmE75 are integrated in such a way that activation of RORE-linked target genes depends on the relative expression levels of the two receptor types.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Two distinct nuclear receptor interaction domains in NSD1, a novel SET protein that exhibits characteristics of both corepressors and coactivators.

NSD1, a novel 2588 amino acid mouse nuclear protein that interacts directly with the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of several nuclear receptors (NRs), has been identified and characterized. NSD1 contains a SET domain and multiple PHD fingers. In addition to these conserved domains found in both positive and negative Drosophila chromosomal regulators, NSD1 contains two distinct NR interaction domains, NID-L and NID+L, that exhibit binding properties of NIDs found in NR corepressors and coactivators, respectively. NID-L, but not NID+L, interacts with the unliganded LBDs of retinoic acid receptors (RAR) and thyroid hormone receptors (TR), and this interaction is severely impaired by mutations in the LBD alpha-helix 1 that prevent binding of corepressors and transcriptional silencing by apo-NRs. NID+L, but not NID-L, interacts with the liganded LBDs of RAR, TR, retinoid X receptor (RXR), and estrogen receptor (ER), and this interaction is abrogated by mutations in the LBD alpha-helix 12 that prevent binding of coactivators of the ligand-induced transcriptional activation function AF-2. A novel variant (FxxLL) of the NR box motif (LxxLL) is present in NID+L and is required for the binding of NSD1 to holo-LBDs. Interestingly, NSD1 contains separate repression and activation domains. Thus, NSD1 may define a novel class of bifunctional transcriptional intermediary factors playing distinct roles in both the presence and absence of ligand.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Transcriptional regulation of human polyomavirus JC: evidence for a functional interaction between RelA (p65) and the Y-box-binding protein, YB-1.

The transcriptional control region of the human neurotropic polyomavirus JC virus contains a consensus NF-kappa B site which has been shown to enhance both basal and extracellular stimulus-induced levels of transcription of JC promoters. Here, we show that the expression of JC late promoter constructs containing the NF-kappa B site is decreased by cotransfection with the NF-kappa B/rel subunits, p50 and p52, but enhanced by the p65 subunit. However, JC promoter constructs lacking the NF-kappa B site were activated by p52 and p50 and repressed by p65. This antithetical response of the JC promoter mapped specifically to the D domain, which is a target site for the cellular transcription factor, YB-1. Band shift studies indicated that YB-1 and p65 modulate each other's binding to DNA: YB-1 augments the affinity of p65 for the NF-kappa B site, while p65 reduces the binding of YB-1 to the D domain. Results from coimmunoprecipitation followed by Western blot (immunoblot) analysis suggest an in vivo interaction between p65 and YB-1 in glial cells. Functionally, YB-1 appears to act synergistically with p65 to control transcription from the NF-kappa B site. A converse pattern is seen with the D domain, in which YB-1 acts synergistically with p50 and p52 to regulate transcription. p50 and p52 may function as transcriptional activators on the D domain by removing the repressive effect of p65 on YB-1 binding to the D domain. On the basis of these data, we propose a model in which NF-kappa B/rel subunits functionally interact with consensus NF-kappa B sites or YB-1-binding sites, with disparate effects on eukaryotic gene expression.

Base Sequence↗

Friend of GATA 2 physically interacts with chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-TF2 (COUP-TF2) and COUP-TF3 and represses COUP-TF2-dependent activation of the atrial natriuretic factor promoter.

Friend of GATA (FOG)-2 is a multi-zinc finger transcriptional corepressor protein that binds specifically to GATA4. Gene targeting studies have demonstrated that FOG-2 is required for normal cardiac morphogenesis, including the development of the coronary vasculature, left ventricular compact zone, and heart valves. To better understand the molecular mechanisms by which FOG-2 regulates these cardiac developmental programs, we screened a mouse day 11 embryo library using a yeast two-hybrid interaction trap with the fifth and sixth zinc fingers of FOG-2 as bait. Using this approach, we isolated clones encoding the orphan nuclear receptors chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor (COUP-TF) 2 and COUP-TF3. COUP-TF2-null embryos die during embryonic development with defective angiogenesis and cardiac defects, a pattern that partly resembles the FOG-2-null phenotype. The interaction between COUP-TF2 and FOG-2 in mammalian cells was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation of these proteins from transfected COS-7 cells. The sites of binding interaction between COUP-TF2 and FOG-2 were mapped to zinc fingers 5 and 6 and fingers 7 and 8 of FOG-2 and to the carboxyl terminus of the COUP-TF proteins. Binding to COUP-TF2 was specific because FOG-2 did not interact with the ligand-binding domains of retinoid X receptor alpha, glucocorticoid receptor, and peroxisome proliferating antigen receptor gamma, which are related to the COUP-TF proteins. Full-length FOG-2 markedly enhanced transcriptional repression by GAL4-COUP-TF2(117-414), but not by a COUP-TF2 repression domain mutant. Moreover, FOG-2 repressed COUP-TF2dependent synergistic activation of the atrial natriuretic factor promoter by both GATA4 and the FOG-2-independent mutant GATA4-E215K. Taken together, these findings suggest that FOG-2 functions as a corepressor for both GATA and COUP-TF proteins.

3T3 Cells↗

Alternate surfaces of transcriptional coregulator GRIP1 function in different glucocorticoid receptor activation and repression contexts.

Members of the mammalian p160 family, such as GRIP1, are known as glucocorticoid receptor (GR) coactivators; at certain glucocorticoid response elements (GREs), however, GRIP1 acts as a GR corepressor. We characterized functional interactions of GR and GRIP1 in a repression complex where GR tethers to DNA-bound activator protein-1 (AP-1), as at the human collagenase-3 gene, and tested whether the identified interactions were similar or different at other response elements. At the AP-1 tethering GRE, we mapped the GRIP1 corepressor activity to a domain distinct from the two known GRIP1 activation domains; it exhibited intrinsic GR-independent repression potential when recruited to DNA via Gal4 DNA-binding domain. Interestingly, neither the domain nor the activity was detected in the other two p160 family members, SRC1 and RAC3. The same GRIP1 corepression domain was required for GR-mediated repression at the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) tethering GRE of the human IL-8 gene. In contrast, at the osteocalcin gene GRE, where GR represses transcription by binding to a DNA site overlapping the TATA box, both GRIP1 and SRC1 corepressed, and the GRIP1-specific repression domain was dispensable. Thus, in a single cell type, GR and GRIP1 conferred one mode of activation and two modes of repression by selectively engaging distinct surfaces of GRIP1 in a response element-specific manner.

Carrier Proteins↗

Dual signaling functions of the hybrid sensor kinase RpfC of Xanthomonas campestris involve either phosphorelay or receiver domain-protein interaction.

The hybrid sensor kinase RpfC positively regulates the expression of a range of virulent genes and negatively modulates the synthesis of the quorum sensing signal diffusible signal factor (DSF) in Xanthomonas campestris. Three conserved amino acid residues of RpfC implicated in phosphorelay (His(198) in the histidine kinase domain, Asp(512) in the receiver domain, and His(657) in the histidine phosphotransfer domain) were essential for activation of the production of extracellular enzymes and extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) virulence factors but were not essential for repression of DSF biosynthesis. Domain deletion and subsequent in trans expression analysis revealed that the receiver domain of RpfC alone was sufficient to repress DSF overproduction in an rpfC deletion mutant. Further deletion and alanine scanning mutagenesis analyses identified a peptide of 107 amino acids and three amino acid residues (Gln(496), Glu(504), and Ile(552)) involved in modulating DSF production. Co-immunoprecipitation and far Western blot analyses suggested an interaction between the receiver domain and RpfF, the enzyme involved in DSF biosynthesis. These data support a model in which RpfC modulates two different functions (virulence factor synthesis and DSF synthesis) by utilization of a conserved phosphorelay system and a novel domain-specific protein-protein interaction mechanism, respectively. This latter mechanism represents an added dimension to conventional two-component signaling paradigms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Doxorubicin down-regulates Kruppel-associated box domain-associated protein 1 sumoylation that relieves its transcription repression on p21WAF1/CIP1 in breast cancer MCF-7 cells.

The role of post-translational modification, such as sumoylation, in modulating the efficacy of doxorubicin (Dox) treatment remains unclear. Transcriptional cofactor KRAB domain-associated protein 1 (KAP1) has been shown to complex with the KRAB zinc finger protein, ZBRK1, to repress the transcription of target genes. Through a combination of proteomic screening and site-directed mutagenesis approaches, we have identified lysines 554, 779, and 804 as the major sumoylation sites in KAP1. We then present evidence that Dox-mediated induction of cell cycle regulator p21 expression is differentially regulated by KAP1 sumoylation status. Moreover, the KAP1 sumoylation level was transiently decreased upon Dox exposure, and transfection with the KAP1 sumoylation mimetic, SUMO-1-KAP1, desensitizes breast cancer MCF-7 cells to Dox-elicited cell death. The sumoylation-dependent stimulation of KAP1 function is achieved by enhancing the methylation of H3-K9 and attenuating the acetylation of H3-K9 and H3-K14 at the p21 core promoter. We also show that occupancy of ZBRK1 response elements located at the p21 promoter by ZBRK1.KAP1 is independent of KAP1 sumoylation. Hence, sumoylation of KAP1 represses p21 transcription via a chromatin-silencing process without affecting interaction between KAP1.ZBRK1 and DNA, thus providing a novel mechanistic basis for the understanding of Dox-induced de-repression of p21 transcription. Taken together, our results suggest that Dox-induced decrease in KAP1 sumoylation is essential for Dox to induce p21 expression and subsequent cell growth inhibition in MCF-7 cells.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗