Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Gabapentin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources

Oral gabapentin disposition in patients with epilepsy after a high-protein meal.

PURPOSE: To study the interaction between gabapentin (GBP) and high-protein meals, 12 patients with epilepsy were administered this drug both while in a fasting state and after a high-protein meal. METHODS: After having acquired their informed consent, the patients (suffering from partial complex seizures resistant to other anticonvulsants) were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 6 subjects. Each subject was treated in a fasting state with a single 400 (group A) or 800 (group B) mg GBP oral dose. After 24 h, the GBP dose regimen was repeated, but was given after a high-protein meal. Serum GBP concentrations were measured by LC-Mass at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 24 h. Saliva GBP concentrations were determined at baseline and 2, 4.8, and 12 h. GBP urinary excretion was determined at 0-4, 4-8, and 8-12 h intervals. The following kinetic parameters were calculated: area under the concentration time curve from zero time to 24 h after the dose, AUC 0-24 h; maximal serum concentration, Cmax; time to the maximal serum concentration, Tmax; absorption rate constant, ka; elimination rate constant, beta; elimination half-time, t1/2beta. Student's t test for paired data, with significance assigned at P < 0.05, was used. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were seen in GBP serum or saliva concentrations or in its urinary excretion (both in A or B group) between fasting and after the high-protein meal. CONCLUSIONS: High-protein meals do not seem to interfere with oral disposition of GBP.

Acetates↗

Failure of absorption of gabapentin after rectal administration.

PURPOSE: We wished to determine the extent of absorption of gabapentin (GBP) after rectal administration to children on maintenance therapy. METHODS: Two children scheduled for extensive surgery received GBP rectally and orally. A pharmacokinetic profile was derived after each route of administration. RESULTS: Serum GBP levels after rectal administration decreased at a rate similar to their rate of decrease after oral administration. However, GBP concentrations were much lower after rectal administration; therefore, we concluded that the aqueous solution was poorly absorbed rectally. The GBP half-life (t1/2) for the 2 children after oral doses were 4.2 and 4.8 h. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal administration of GBP is not satisfactory when oral administration is interrupted. When oral GBP therapy is temporarily discontinued, clinicians should consider administration of alternative antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that can be administered parenterally or rectally.

Acetates↗

Anticonvulsant action of gabapentin during postnatal development in rats.

PURPOSE: To study the anticonvulsant effects of gabapentin (GBP) in immature animals. METHODS: Motor seizures were induced by pentylenetetrazol in 7-, 12-, 18-, 25-day-old, and adult rats. Animals pretreated with GBP (15, 30, or 60 mg/kg i.p.) were compared with controls. The incidence and latency of two types of seizures [minimal (i.e., clonic)] and generalized tonic-clonic (GTCS) were recorded, and seizure severity was scored. RESULTS: GBP suppressed or at least restricted the tonic phase of GTCS at all the developmental stages studied. In addition, minimal seizures were suppressed in 18-day-old rats. Both effects exhibited a tendency to a U-shaped dose-response curve. CONCLUSIONS: Anticonvulsant effects of GBP were demonstrated in immature and in adult rats.

Acetates↗

Utility of the lethargic (lh/lh) mouse model of absence seizures in predicting the effects of lamotrigine, vigabatrin, tiagabine, gabapentin, and topiramate against human absence seizures.

PURPOSE: Traditional methods of preclinical screening have predicted the effects of a putative antiepileptic drug (AED) against human absence seizures by testing its efficacy against clonic seizures in the high-dose pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) model. This high-dose PTZ model correctly predicted the efficacy of ethosuximide (ESM), benzodiazepines, and valproate (VPA) and the lack of efficacy of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ). However, the high-dose PTZ model erred in predictions for (a) phenobarbital (PB) (PTZ: efficacy; human: nonefficacy); (b) lamotrigine (LTG) (PTZ: nonefficacy; human: efficacy); (c) vigabatrin (VGB) (PTZ: nonefficacy; human: proabsence effect); and (d) tiagabine (TGB) (PTZ: efficacy; human: possible proabsence). It also appears to have erred in predictions for gabapentin (GBP) (PTZ: efficacy) and topiramate (TPM) (PTZ: efficacy). Because the lh/lh genetic model of absence seizures correctly predicted effects of ESM, clonazepam, VPA, PHT, CBZ, and PB against human absence seizures, we performed this study to test the predictive utility of the lh/lh model for LTG, VGB, TGB, GBP, and TPM. METHODS: Bipolar recording electrodes were implanted bilaterally into frontal neocortex of 8-week-old male lh/lh mice. With the exception of VGB, vehicle or drugs were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) on alternating days, and an EEG was used to record effects on seizure frequency. With VGB, vehicle was administered i.p. on day 1, and gradually increasing doses of VGB were administered on successive days. Drug and vehicle effects were compared in corresponding 15-min epochs of the 150-min period after administration. RESULTS: LTG (4.8-144 micromol/kg) significantly (p < 0.04) reduced seizure frequency (by 65%) compared with vehicle. In contrast, VGB (0.35-11 mmol/kg) and TGB (0.27-27 micromol/kg) significantly increased seizure frequency (300-700%) and seizure duration (1,700-1,800%; p < 0.001). GBP (18 micromol/kg to 1.8 mmol/kg) and TPM (8.9-295 micromol/kg) had no significant effect on seizure frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the high-dose PTZ model, the lh/lh model correctly predicted the antiabsence effect of LTG, the possible proabsence effects of VGB and TGB, and the lack of effect of GBP and TPM. The lh/lh model appears to be superior to the high-dose PTZ model in predicting efficacy of putative AEDs against human absence seizures.

Acetates↗

Effects of phenytoin, carbamazepine, and gabapentin on calcium channels in hippocampal granule cells from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The anticonvulsants phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and gabapentin (GBP) are commonly used in the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Ca2+ current modulation has been proposed to contribute to the antiepileptic activity of these drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of these anticonvulsants on voltage-dependent calcium channels in pathologically altered neurons from patients with chronic temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: Acutely isolated human hippocampal granule cells were examined by using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. RESULTS: PHT and CBZ produced a reversible, concentration-dependent inhibition of high-voltage-activated (HVA) Ca2+ currents without affecting voltage-dependent activation. The concentration-response curves of PHT and CBZ indicated maximal inhibition of 35 and 65%, respectively, with half-maximal inhibition being obtained at 89 and 244 microM, respectively. At therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations, HVA currents were not significantly altered by PHT and CBZ. However, PHT but not CBZ showed a reduction of HVA currents of 16% at a therapeutic whole-brain concentration of 80 microM. In contrast to CBZ, PHT produced a small hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation. PHT, 80 microM, shifted the potential of half-maximal inactivation by -3.1 +/- 0.5 mV (p < 0.05). GBP, which was recently found to bind to the alpha2delta subunit of a neuronal Ca2+ channel, showed no modulation of Ca2+ conductances. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, in contrast to GBP and CBZ, modulation of postsynaptic Ca2+ channels can contribute to the anticonvulsant action of PHT in human hippocampal granule cells.

Acetates↗

Effects of age and gender on single-dose pharmacokinetics of gabapentin.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of age, age-related changes in renal function, and gender on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of orally administered gabapentin (GBP). METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of a single 400-mg oral dose of GBP were studied in 36 healthy subjects (18 men and 18 women) aged 20-78 years. Serial blood samples and total urine output were collected for 48 h after the dose. GBP concentrations in plasma and urine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: All subjects tolerated the drug well, with only mild symptoms reported. No change in maximal GBP plasma concentration (Cmax), time at which Cmax occurred (tmax), or apparent volume of distribution (V/F) with age was noted. A significant linear decline in apparent oral clearance (CL/F), elimination-rate constant (lambda z), and renal clearance (CLR) with increasing age was observed (p < 0.005). Because total urinary recovery of unchanged drug (an estimate of F for GBP) did not change with age, the decline in CL/F and lambda z can be explained by the decline in CLR. The only pharmacokinetic parameter that was significantly different between genders was Cmax, which was approximately 25% higher for women than for men (p = 0.016), consistent with gender differences in body size. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that changes in renal function are responsible for age-related changes in GBP pharmacokinetics. Reduction of GBP dosage may be required in elderly patients with reduced renal function. The pharmacokinetics of GBP are similar in men and women.

Acetates↗

A beneficial effect on mood in partial epilepsy patients treated with gabapentin.

PURPOSE: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are frequently used for their beneficial psychoactive effects on affective disorders. We sought to demonstrate a psychoactive effect of gabapentin (GBP) when used as add-on AED therapy. METHODS: Forty adult patients with partial epilepsy were studied in a prospective, non-randomized fashion with interviewer-rated and self-rated scales of mood and anxiety: the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Hamilton Depression (Ham-D) and Anxiety (Ham-A) Scales. After completion of baseline mood and anxiety scales (time 1), 20 of the 40 patients were prescribed add-on GBP (treated group). The remaining 20 patients served as a control group. Both groups were similar in age and sex distribution. Follow-up mood and anxiety scales were performed in all patients approximately 3 months later (time 2). The average GBP dose at time 2 was 1,615 mg/day. All patients were taking stable doses of one to four AEDs at baseline and throughout the study. Seizure frequency was monitored throughout. Statistical significance was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using a two-factor repeated-measures model. RESULTS: The GBP-treated group had a significant decrease in CDRS score over time compared with the control group (p = 0.04). No significant differences between the control and the treated groups were found for any of the remaining mood scales (BDI, p = 0.58; Ham-D, p = 0.59; Ham-A, p = 0.93). There was no significant difference or change in seizure frequency between groups. CONCLUSIONS: GBP treatment is associated with mood improvement as measured by the CDRS. This improvement was not accounted for by seizure improvement.

Acetates↗

Differential cognitive effects of carbamazepine and gabapentin.

PURPOSE: The cognitive effects of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) compared with the older standard AEDs are uncertain. METHODS: We directly compared the cognitive effects of carbamazepine (CBZ) and gabapentin (GBP) in 35 healthy subjects by using a double-blind, randomized crossover design with two 5-week treatment periods. During each treatment condition, subjects received either GBP, 2,400 mg/day, or CBZ (mean, 731 mg/day) adjusted to a dose to achieve midrange standard therapeutic blood levels (mean, 8.3 microg/ml). Subjects were tested at the end of each AED treatment period and in four drug-free conditions [two pretreatment baselines and two post-treatment washout periods (1 month after each AED)]. The neuropsychological test battery included 17 measures yielding 31 total variables. RESULTS: Direct comparison of the two AEDs revealed significantly better performance on eight variables for GBP, but none for CBZ. Comparison of CBZ and GBP to the nondrug average revealed significant statistical differences for 15 (48%) of 31 the variables. Pairwise follow-up analyses of the 15 variables revealed significantly better performance for nondrug average on 13 variables compared with CBZ, and on four compared with GBP. GBP was better than nondrug average on one variable. CONCLUSIONS: Although both CBZ and GBP produced some effects, GBP produced significantly fewer untoward cognitive effects compared with CBZ at the dosages used in this study.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin.

Gabapentin (GBP) is a antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated as adjunct therapy for treatment of partial seizures, with and without secondary generalization, in patients 12 and older with epilepsy. GBP (1-(aminomethyl) cyclohexaneacetic acid) is structurally related to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which readily crosses the blood-brain barrier. Radiolabeled GBP binds throughout the central nervous system in anatomic areas important in treatment of seizures. Its precise mechanism of action is unknown. An open-label, dose-ranging study of doses up to 1,800 mg produced > or =50% seizure reductions [responder rate (RR)] in 29% of patients with partial seizures. Three double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel add-on trials at doses of 300-1,800 mg have produced RR of up to 28%, with a placebo RR of 8-10%. An active controlled, parallel group comparison of 600 mg to 2,400 mg in monotherapy conversion design showed no significant difference among the 600 mg, 1,200 mg, and 2,400 mg groups compared to a placebo group. An inpatient, active-controlled comparison of 300 mg and 3,600 mg in a parallel-design monotherapy trial showed that time to exit from the study was significantly longer for the 3,600-mg group and the completion rate significantly higher (53% vs. 17%) for patients receiving 3,600 mg/day vs. 300 mg/day of GBP. Successful double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in refractory childhood partial seizures and benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes have been recently concluded. Absence was not successfully treated in one small double-blind trial. Open-label reports emphasize adjustments of patients to higher doses than those indicated in the package labeling. An open-label trial of GBP therapy in patients with partial seizures (n = 2,216) produced progressively greater seizure freedom rates as patients were titrated from > or =900 mg daily to > or = 1,800 mg daily (15.1% vs. 33.4%), with a similar effect on RR (18.1% vs. 44.9%). An add-on, open-label study treating partial seizures (n = 141) reported an RR of 71%, with 46% seizure-free in the last 8 weeks of treatment and doses up to 2,400 mg daily. A comparison trial of three doses of GBP to 600 mg of carbamazepine showed similar retention rates for 1,800 mg of GBP and 600 mg of CBZ. Another study reported 48% of patients experiencing 50% reduction, nine of whom had doses greater than 2,400 mg. Treatment in children has reported a 34.4% RR in 32 children with refractory partial seizures. A French open-label adjunctive trial documented a 33.9% RR; 13.4% were seizure-free during the evaluation period. Adverse experiences most commonly noted included somnolence, dizziness, and ataxia. Weight gain was sometimes reported with higher doses of GBP, and pediatric reports cite prominent behavioral changes, including hyperactivity, irritability, and agitation. GBP appears best used at doses at and potentially above those suggested in its package labeling. Although efficacy occurs at lower levels, increased GBP doses are associated with additional efficacy. Reports suggest that initiation at 2,400 mg or 3,600 mg may not be associated with increased adverse experiences. Titration to 900 or 1,200 mg on the first day of GBP therapy appear to be well tolerated.

Acetates↗

The long-term use of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin in patients with chronic epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term retention of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) by patients with chronic epilepsy and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. To assess the likelihood of seizure freedom, seizure-related injury/hospital admission and mortality after these drugs were commenced. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-records survey in five tertiary referral epilepsy centres in the U.K. The retention times on treatment (from initiation to discontinuation) for the different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were compared by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Incidences of seizure freedom and seizure-related injury/hospital admissions and standardised mortality ratios were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1,375 patients with chronic epilepsy included; 361 were taking GBP, 1,050 LTG, and 713 VGB. The retention of GBP, LTG, or VGB was <40% at 6 years. Fewer than 4% of patients become seizure free while taking one of the drugs. There was no reduction in mortality or seizure-related injury/admission. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these new AEDs on chronic epilepsy can be described only as modest. This view may be revised, however, as more experience is gained with new drugs in previously untreated patients.

Acetates↗

Myoclonus associated with the use of gabapentin.

PURPOSE: To report on the occurrence of myoclonus in patients receiving gabapentin (GBP) for the treatment of epilepsy. METHODS: Clinic charts of 104 consecutive patients started on GBP were reviewed. All patients were treated by the same physician, and most were specifically asked about the presence of myoclonus. RESULTS: We found 13 cases of myoclonus. All patients had refractory epilepsy and were taking other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Six patients had a severe chronic static encephalopathy; five patients had no medical diagnosis other than seizures. Ten patients developed multifocal myoclonus. Three patients developed focal myoclonus, contralateral to their epileptic focus. Two patients had an exacerbation of preexistent myoclonus. An EEG performed during myoclonus on three patients showed no correlate. The myoclonus tended to persist as long as GBP was maintained, whereas discontinuance of GBP resulted in rapid cessation of the myoclonus. In all cases the myoclonus was subtle and did not significantly interfere with daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: GBP-associated myoclonus appears to be relatively frequent. It is usually mild and can easily be overlooked. Discontinuation of therapy is not necessary in most cases.

Acetates↗

Effects of gabapentin on brain GABA, homocarnosine, and pyrrolidinone in epilepsy patients.

PURPOSE: Gabapentin (GBP) was introduced as an antiepileptic drug (AED) and has been used in the management of neuropathic pain. We reported that daily dosing increased brain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in patients with epilepsy. This study was designed to determine how rapidly brain GABA and the GABA metabolites, homocarnosine and pyrrolidinone, increase in response to the first dose of GBP. METHODS: In vivo measurements of GABA, homocarnosine, and pyrrolidinone were made of a 14-cc volume in the occipital cortex by using a 1H spectroscopy with a 2.1-Tesla magnetic resonance spectrometer and an 8-cm surface coil. Six patients (four women) were studied serially after the first oral dose (1,200 mg) of GBP. Five patients (three women) taking a standard daily dose (range, 1,200-2,000 mg) of GBP were rechallenged with a single high dose (2,400 mg). RESULTS: The first dose of GBP increased median brain GABA by 1.3 mM (range, 0.4-1.8 mM) within 1 h. Homocarnosine and pyrrolidinone did not change significantly by 5 h. Daily GBP therapy increased GABA (0.5 mM; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9), homocarnosine (0.3 mM; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), and pyrrolidinone (0.10 mM; 95% CI, 0.06-0.14). Rechallenging patients taking GBP daily increased median brain GABA by 0.4 mM (range, 0.3-0.5) within 1 h. CONCLUSIONS: GBP promptly elevates brain GABA and presumably offers partial protection against further seizures within hours of the first oral dose. Patients may expect to experience the anticonvulsant effects of increased homocarnosine and pyrrolidinone with daily therapy.

Acetates↗

Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin during delivery, in the neonatal period, and lactation: does a fetal accumulation occur during pregnancy?

PURPOSE: To study the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin (GBP) during delivery, lactation, and in the neonatal period. METHODS: GBP concentrations in plasma and breast milk were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography in samples from six women treated with GBP and in their offspring. Blood samples were obtained at delivery from mothers, from the umbilical cord, and from the newborns on three occasions during 2 days after delivery. GBP concentration also was determined in breast milk and in blood collected from five of the mothers and suckling infants 2 weeks to 3 months after birth. RESULTS: The umbilical cord/maternal plasma concentration ratios ranged from 1.3 to 2.1 (mean, 1.7). GBP plasma concentrations in the neonates declined with an estimated half-life of 14 h. Mean GBP plasma concentrations in the infants were 27% of the cord plasma levels (range, 12-36%) 24 h postpartum. The mean milk/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 1.0 (range, 0.7-1.3) from 2 weeks to 3 months. The infant dose of GBP was estimated to 0.2-1.3 mg/kg/day, equivalent to 1.3-3.8% of the weight-normalized dose received by the mother. The plasma concentrations in the breast-fed infants were approximately 12% of the mother's plasma levels, but no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our limited observations suggest an active transplacental transport of GBP, with accumulation in the fetus as a consequence. We suggest that this could be by the specific L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT-1), which is expressed in the placenta. Newborns seem to have a slightly lower capacity to eliminate GBP than do adults. Transfer of GBP to breast milk is extensive, but plasma concentrations appear to be low in suckling infants. No adverse effects were observed in the newborn. Although more data are needed, our observations suggest that breastfeeding in conjunction with GBP treatment is safe.

Amines↗

Brain homocarnosine and seizure control of patients taking gabapentin or topiramate.

PURPOSE: To assess the relation between seizure control and brain homocarnosine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels of patients with complex partial seizures taking gabapentin (GBP) or topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy. METHODS: In vivo measurements of GABA and homocarnosine were made of a 14-cc volume in the occipital cortex by using (1)H spectroscopy with a 2.1-Tesla magnetic resonance spectrometer and an 8-cm surface coil. Poor seizure control was defined as more recent seizures than the median for the two groups of patients studied. RESULTS: Homocarnosine levels were higher in patients with better seizure control than in those with poor control. No differences were found in the intracellular GABA levels between the patients who responded to GBP or TPM compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: In the visual neocortex, which is remote from the presumed seizure-onset zone, higher homocarnosine levels were associated with better seizure control in the patients taking GBP or TPM as adjunctive therapy; elevated intracellular GABA levels appeared to offer no additional protection.

Adult↗

Gabapentin in refractory partial epilepsy--a trial in India.

Gabapentin (GBP) has been shown to be effective an add-on drug for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy. We undertook an open clinical trial to test its efficacy for the first time in India. Twenty-six patients with refractory partial seizures (> 4 per month) were given GBP in a titrated dose and the seizure frequency was noted for 3 months. The mean reduction in seizures was significant: 15.87 (SD = 4.5) vs 5.80 (SD = 10.25). The mean percentage change (PCH) from the baseline was -36. Twenty-one of 26 (80%) patients had a reduction in the number of seizures, and 13/26 (50%) were identified as responders (> 50% reduction in seizures). The responders were significantly younger than the nonresponders. Adverse events were mild and noted in 46% patients. Although the trial has its limitations, this is probably the first trial of GBP in a developing country.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin add-on treatment: how many patients become seizure-free? An open-label multicenter study.

The aim of the study was to find out the percentage of patients with localization-related epilepsy achieving complete seizure control with gabapentin (GBP) add-on therapy. Patients under anti-epileptic drug monotherapy during 8 weeks baseline (BSL) with 6 or more seizures were treated with GBP for 26 weeks up to 2400 mg/day. Patients obtaining complete seizure control of all seizures or any partial seizure type during the last 8 weeks were calculated. Seizure frequency was compared between BSL and last 8 weeks. In all, 110 patients were enrolled (92 completed, 18 discontinued): mean age of the completers: 37.6 years (range 16-72), median seizure frequency per 28 days at BSL: 6.8 (2.5-24.5), mean duration of epilepsy: 17.6 years (0.2-51.4), mean duration with GBP for completers: 182.8 days (144-187). Complete seizure control of all seizures was achieved in 8.7% of patients (simple partial seizures: 13.3%, complex partial seizures 24.3%, secondarily generalized seizures: 61.5%): 38% of the patients became seizure-free in at least 1 seizure-type; 40% experienced adverse events. Assessment for quality of life (QoL) and trough plasma levels of GBP did not correlate with the good effect of GBP.

Acetates↗

Oxcarbazepine monotherapy in postherpetic neuralgia unresponsive to carbamazepine and gabapentin.

OBJECTIVES: We present the results of a preliminary, open-label trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) unresponsive to treatment with antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine and gabapentin) and local anesthetic blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients were treated with oxcarbazepine monotherapy for 8 weeks. Starting dose was 150 mg/day, subsequently increased by 150 mg/day every 2 days until a maintenance dose of 900 mg/day. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the mean VAS score following 8 weeks of treatment (Delta=5.33; paired t-test: P <0.0001) compared with baseline. Oxcarbazepine was effective from the first week of treatment. There was a significant reduction in allodynia, leading to improvements in patients' functioning and quality of life. Oxcarbazepine was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Oxcarbazepine appears to be a promising alternative monotherapeutic approach for patients affected by PHN.

Adult↗

Comparison of the antinociceptive profiles of gabapentin and 3-methylgabapentin in rat models of acute and persistent pain: implications for mechanism of action.

The anticonvulsant gabapentin (GBP) has been shown effective for the treatment of neuropathic pain, although its mechanism of action remains unclear. A recent report has suggested that binding to the alpha(2)delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels contributes to its antinociceptive effect, based on the stereoselective efficacy of two analogs: (1S,3R)3-methylgabapentin (3-MeGBP) (IC(50) = 42 nM), which is effective in neuropathic pain models; and (1R,3R)3-MeGBP (IC(50) > 10,000 nM), which is ineffective (Field et al., 2000). The present study was designed to further examine the profiles of GBP and 3-MeGBP in rat models of acute and persistent pain. Systemic administration of GBP or (1S,3R)3-MeGBP inhibited tactile allodynia in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain, whereas (1R,3R)3-MeGBP was ineffective. The antiallodynic effect of GBP, but not (1S,3R)3-MeGBP, was blocked by i.t. injection of the GABA(B) receptor antagonist [3-[[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]amino]propyl](diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid (CGP52432). Systemic GBP or (1S,3R)3-MeGBP also inhibited the second phase of formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviors, whereas (1R,3R)3-MeGBP was ineffective. However, both (1S,3R)3-MeGBP and (1R,3R)3-MeGBP, but not GBP, inhibited first phase behaviors. In the carrageenan model of inflammatory pain, systemic GBP or (1R,3R)3-MeGBP failed to inhibit thermal hyperalgesia, whereas (1S,3R)3-MeGBP had a significant, albeit transient, effect. Systemic (1S,3R)3-MeGBP, but not GBP or (1R,3R)3-MeGBP, also produced an antinociceptive effect in the warm water tail withdrawal test of acute pain. These data demonstrate that GBP and 3-MeGBP display different antinociceptive profiles, suggesting dissimilar mechanisms of antinociceptive action. Thus, the stereoselective efficacy of 3-MeGBP, presumably related to alpha(2)delta binding, likely does not completely account for the mechanism of action of GBP.

Acetates↗