Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Surface plasmon resonance study of g protein/receptor coupling in a lipid bilayer-free system.

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy is a technique to study protein-protein interactions in real time; however, application of SPR spectroscopy for investigations of membrane receptors is difficult with respect to functional and uniform immobilization of receptors on a biosensor surface. In the current study, we developed a simple, direct, biosensor-based approach to monitor the molecular interactions between G protein transducin (Gt) and rhodopsin (Rho), a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Detergent-solubilized dark-adapted Rho was captured onto a biosensor surface via lectin interaction, enabling site-directed immobilization of the receptor that made its cytoplasmic surface accessible to a coupling G protein. The system resembled the natural system with respect to receptor density, binding of Gt following flash or constant light application, fast GTP-dependent dissociation of Gt from Rho, regeneration of Rho, and dependence of Gt binding on light intensity and on concentration of Gt. The apparent KD of the Gt/Rho interaction was 13.6 nM. Our results validate the use of SPR spectroscopy as a tool to study G protein activation in GPCR systems and could be extended for application to other interaction partners of GPCRs.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

G protein-coupled receptor activation: analysis of a highly constrained, "straitjacketed" rhodopsin.

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation is generally assumed to result in a significant structural rearrangement of the receptor, presumably involving the rigid body movement of transmembrane helices. We have investigated the activation of the GPCR rhodopsin by the construction and analysis of a mutant which contains a total of four disulfide bonds connecting the cytoplasmic ends of helices 1 and 7, and 3 and 5, and the extracellular ends of helices 3 and 4, and 5 and 6. Despite the constraints imposed by four disulfides, this "straitjacketed" receptor retains the ability to activate the G protein transducin and, therefore, provides insight into the molecular mechanism of the initial step in signal transduction of this important class of receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Rapid irreversible G protein alpha subunit misfolding due to intramolecular kinetic bottleneck that precedes Mg2+ "lock" after GTP/GDP exchange.

Stoichiometric exchange of GTP for GDP on heterotrimeric G protein alpha (Galpha) subunits is essential to most hormone and neurotransmitter initiated signal transduction. Galphas are stably activated in a Mg2+ complex with GTPgammaS, a nonhydrolyzable GTP analogue that is reported to bind Galpha, with very high affinity. Yet, it is common to find that substantial amounts (30-90%) of purified G proteins cannot be activated. Inactivatable G protein has heretofore been thought to have become "denatured" during formation of the obligatory nucleotide-free or empty (MT) Galpha-state that is intermediary to GDP/GTP exchange at a single binding site. We find Galpha native secondary and tertiary structure to persist during formation of the irreversibly inactivatable state of transducin. MT Galpha is therefore irreversibly misfolded rather than denatured. Inactivation by misfolding is found to compete kinetically with protective but weak preequilibrium nucleotide binding at micromolar ambient GTPgammaS concentrations. Because of the weak preequilibrium, quantitative protection against Galpha aggregation is only achieved at free nucleotide concentrations 10-100 times higher than those commonly employed in G protein radio-nucleotide binding studies. Initial GTP protection is also poor because of the extreme slowness of an intramolecular Galpha refolding step (isomerization) necessary for GTP sequestration after its weak preequilibrium binding. Of the two slowly interconverting Galpha x GTP isomers described here, only the second can bind Mg2+, "locking" GTP in place with a large net rise in GTP binding affinity. A companion Galpha x GDP isomerization reaction is identified as the cause of the very slow spontaneous GDP dissociation that characterizes G protein nucleotide exchange and low spontaneous background activity in the absence of GPCR activation. Galpha x GDP and Galpha x GTP isomerization reactions are proposed as the dual target for GPCR catalysis of nucleotide exchange.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Studies on the structure of the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin including the putative G-protein binding site in unactivated and activated forms.

Activation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) is not yet understood. A recent structure showed most of rhodopsin in the ground (not activated) state of the GPCR, but the cytoplasmic face, which couples to the G protein in signal transduction, was not well-defined. We have determined an experimental three-dimensional structure for rhodopsin in the unactivated state, which shows good agreement with the crystal structure in the transmembrane domain. This new structure defines the cytoplasmic face of rhodopsin. The G-protein binding site can be mapped. The same experimental approach yields a preliminary structure of the cytoplasmic face in the activated (metarhodopsin II) receptor. Differences between the two structures suggest how the receptor is activated to couple with transducin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Structural studies of metarhodopsin II, the activated form of the G-protein coupled receptor, rhodopsin.

The structural changes that accompany activation of a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) are not well understood. To better understand the activation of rhodopsin, the GPCR responsible for visual transduction, we report studies on the three-dimensional structure for the activated state of this receptor, metarhodopsin II. Differences between the three-dimensional structure of ground state rhodopsin and metarhodopsin II, particularly in the cytoplasmic face of the receptor, suggest how the receptor is activated to couple with transducin. In particular, activation opens a groove on the surface of the receptor that could bind the N-terminal helix of the G protein, transducin alpha.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

A conformational trigger for activation of a G protein by a G protein-coupled receptor.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a family of seven transmembrane helical proteins that initiate a cellular response to an environmental signal. Once activated by an extracellular signal, GPCRs trigger the intracellular signal transduction cascade by activating a heterotrimeric G protein. The interaction between the G protein and the receptor, which triggers the signal transduction, is the focus of intense interest. Three-dimensional structures of the ground state of only one GPCR, rhodopsin, are currently available, but since the G protein cannot bind to this structure, these structures did not lead to an understanding of the activation process. The recent publication of an excited state structure for the same GPCR (and comparison to the ground state structures), in conjunction with other recent biochemical data, provides new insight into G protein activation. We find that the structure data and the biochemical data, for the first time, point to a specific mode of interaction between the G protein and the receptor. Furthermore, we find that transducin (G(t)) must alter its conformation to bind to the activated receptor; the "lock and key" fit heretofore expected is likely not the correct model. We suggest that a conformational distortion, driven by the energy of binding, is induced in G(t) when it binds to the activated receptor. The conformational change in turn enables the exchange of GTP for GDP and the dissociation of the subunits. This is an example of "induced fit" originally proposed by Koshland to describe enzyme-substrate interactions.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Dimerization in aminergic G-protein-coupled receptors: application of a hidden-site class model of evolution.

G-Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are an important superfamily of transmembrane proteins involved in cellular communication. Recently, it has been shown that dimerization is a widely occurring phenomenon in the GPCR superfamily, with likely important physiological roles. Here we use a novel hidden-site class model of evolution as a sequence analysis tool to predict possible dimerization interfaces in GPCRs. This model aims to simulate the evolution of proteins at the amino acid level, allowing the analysis of their sequences in an explicitly evolutionary context. Applying this model to aminergic GPCR sequences, we first validate the general reasoning behind the model. We then use the model to perform a family specific analysis of GPCRs. Accounting for the family structure of these proteins, this approach detects different evolutionarily conserved and accessible patches on transmembrane (TM) helices 4-6 in different families. On the basis of these findings, we propose an experimentally testable dimerization mechanism, involving interactions among different combinations of these helices in different families of aminergic GPCRs.

Amino Acid Substitution↗
PubMed2004

Characterization of peptides corresponding to the seven transmembrane domains of human adenosine A2a receptor.

Human adenosine A(2)a receptor is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily of seven-helix transmembrane (TM) proteins. To test general models for membrane-protein folding and to identify specific features of folding and assembly for this representative member of an important and poorly understood class of proteins, we synthesized peptides corresponding to its seven TM domains. We assessed the ability of the peptides to insert into micelles and vesicles and measured secondary structure for each peptide in aqueous and membrane-mimetic environments. CD spectra indicate that each of the seven TM peptides form thermally stable, independent alpha-helical structures in both micelles and vesicles. The helical content of the peptides depends on the nature of the membrane-mimetic environment. Four of the peptides (TM3, TM4, TM5, and TM7) exhibit very high-helical structure, near the predicted maximum for their TM segments. The TM1 peptide also adopts relatively high alpha-helical structures. In contrast, two of peptides, TM2 and TM6, display low alpha helicity. Similarly, the ability of the peptides to insert into membrane-mimetic environments, assayed by intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and fluorescence quenching, varied markedly. Most peptides exhibit higher alpha helicity in anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate than in neutral dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside micelles, and TM2 was disordered in zwiterionic DMPC but was alpha-helical in negatively charged DMPC/DMPG vesicles. These findings strongly suggest that electrostatic interactions between lipids and peptides control the insertion of the peptides and may be involved in membrane-protein-folding events. The measured helical content of these TM domains does not correlate with the predicted helicity based on amino acid sequence, pointing out that, while hydrophobic interactions can be a major determinant for folding of TM peptides, other factors, such as electrostatic interactions or helix-helix interactions, may play significant roles for specific TM domains. Our results represent a comprehensive analysis of helical propensities for a human GPCR and support models for membrane-protein folding in which interactions between TM domains are required for proper insertion and folding of some TM helix domains. The tendency of some peptides to self-associate, especially in aqueous environments, underscores the need to prevent improper interactions during folding and refolding of membrane proteins in vivo and in vitro.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Selection of active ScFv to G-protein-coupled receptor CCR5 using surface antigen-mimicking peptides.

This study describes the use of cyclic peptides for use in the selection of single-chain (ScFv) antibodies specific for the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5, a representative G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). A tandem ligation strategy was developed for preparing biotinylated cyclic peptides, first through an orthogonal end-to-end ligation and then a chemoselective ligation with functionalized biotin. Cyclic peptides mimicking the extracellular loops of CCR5 and their unconstrained counterparts were then used for solution-phase selection of ScFv antibodies from a phage display antibody library. Antibodies reactive with CCR5 on cells were detected using a homogeneous high throughput assay. Of 19 isolated ScFv antibodies that bound to CCR5+ cells, three inhibited CCR5-mediated but not CXCR4-mediated HIV infection. Only ScFvs selected by binding to cyclic constrained peptides exhibited inhibitory activity. Our results demonstrate that surface-antigen mimetics of a GPCR are effective tools for selecting active, site-specific ScFv antibodies that hold promise as immunological reagents and therapeutics.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

The receptor-bound "empty pocket" state of the heterotrimeric G-protein alpha-subunit is conformationally dynamic.

Heterotrimeric G-protein activation by a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) requires the propagation of structural signals from the receptor-interacting surfaces to the guanine nucleotide-binding pocket. To probe conformational changes in the G-protein alpha-subunit (G(alpha)) associated with activated GPCR (R*) interactions and guanine nucleotide exchange, high-resolution solution NMR methods are being applied in studying signaling of the G-protein, transducin, by light-activated rhodopsin. Using these methods, we recently demonstrated that an isotope-labeled G(alpha) reconstituted heterotrimer forms functional complexes under NMR experimental conditions with light-activated, detergent-solubilized rhodopsin and a soluble mimic of R*, both of which trigger guanine nucleotide exchange [Ridge, K. D., et al. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 7635-7648]. Here, it is shown that both light-activated rhodopsin and the soluble mimic of R form trapped intermediate complexes with a GDP-released "empty pocket" state of the heterotrimer in the absence of GTP (or GTPgammaS). In contrast to guanine nucleotide-bound forms of G(alpha), the NMR spectra of the GDP-released, R-bound empty pocket state of G(alpha) display severe line broadening suggestive of a dynamic intermediate state. Interestingly, the conformation of a GDP-depleted, Mg(2+)-bound state of G(alpha) generated in a manner independent of R* does not exhibit a similar degree of line broadening but rather appears structurally similar to the GDP/Mg(2+)-bound form of the protein. Taken together, these results suggest that R*-mediated changes in the receptor-interacting regions of G(alpha), and not the absence of bound guanine nucleotide, are the predominant factors which dictate G(alpha) conformation and dynamics in this R*-bound state of the heterotrimer.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Characterization of G protein-coupled receptor regulation in antisense mRNA-expressing cells with reduced arrestin levels.

Previous studies with overexpressing wild-type or dominant negative nonvisual arrestins have established a role for these proteins in beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) internalization, desensitization, and resensitization. To validate and extend such findings, we employed an antisense strategy to target the nonvisual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, and determined the associated effects on the regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. HEK293 cells stably expressing antisense constructs targeting arrestin-2 exhibited a selective reduction (approximately 50%) in arrestin-2 levels, while arrestin-3 antisense constructs resulted in reductions (>/=50%) in both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 levels. Initial analysis of these cells demonstrated that a reduced level of arrestin expression resulted in a significant decrease in the extent of agonist-induced internalization of exogenously expressed beta2ARs, but had no effect on internalization of either m2 or m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Additional characterization involved assessing the role of arrestins in the regulation of endogenous GPCRs in these cells. Reduced arrestin levels significantly decreased the rate of endogenous beta2AR internalization, desensitization, and resensitization. Further analysis demonstrated that the desensitization of endogenous A2b adenosine and prostaglandin E2-stimulated receptors was also attenuated in cells with reduced arrestin levels. The effects on the beta2-adrenergic, A2b adenosine, and PGE2-stimulated receptors were similar among cell lines that exhibited either a selective reduction in arrestin-2 levels or a reduction in both arrestin-2 and -3 levels. These findings establish the utility of antisense approaches in the examination of arrestin-mediated GPCR regulation.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2000

Mechanisms regulating the cell surface residence time of the alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor.

Despite considerable insights concerning the mechanisms regulating short-term agonist-mediated G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) internalization, little is known about the mechanisms regulating GPCR surface residence over long periods of time. Herein, we experimentally evaluated mechanisms regulating the surface t(1/2) of various alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)AR) structures. The Delta 3i alpha(2A)AR (lacking the third intracellular loop), D79N alpha(2A)AR (impaired G protein coupling), and CAM alpha(2A)AR (enhanced G protein coupling) all exhibited a cell surface alpha(2A)AR turnover in Chinese hamster ovary cells that was faster than that of the wild type (WT). Cell surface receptor turnover could be slowed with ligand occupancy of D79N alpha(2A)AR (agonist or antagonist) and CAM alpha(2A)AR (antagonist only) but not the Delta 3i- or WT alpha(2A)AR. This selective ligand-induced surface stabilization was paralleled by a dramatic ligand-dependent receptor density upregulation for D79N- and CAM alpha(2A)AR structures. Receptors which exhibited surface turnover and density that could be modulated by ligand (D79N and CAM) also demonstrated structural instability, measured by a loss of radioligand binding capacity in detergent solution over time without parallel changes in receptor protein content. In contrast, the shorter surface t(1/2) of the Delta 3i alpha(2A)AR, whose cell surface t(1/2) and steady state density were not altered by ligand occupancy, occurred in the context of a structurally stable receptor in detergent solution. These results demonstrate that changes in receptor structure which alter receptor-G protein coupling (either an increase or decrease) are paralleled by structural instability and ligand-induced surface stabilization. These studies also provide criteria for assessing the structural instability of the alpha(2A)AR that can likely be generalized to all GPCRs.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Solution NMR spectroscopy of the human vasopressin V2 receptor, a G protein-coupled receptor.

The seven-transmembrane-spanning G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily plays many important roles in basic biology, human health, and human disease. Here, well-resolved solution NMR spectra are presented for a human GPCR, the vasopressin V2 receptor in detergent micelles. The quality of the NMR spectra indicates that backbone resonance assignments for a majority of resonances are feasible. The key to obtaining high quality spectra appears to be the coupling of methods for expressing the receptor into membranes rather than into inclusion bodies, with use of a biochemically mild lysolipid detergent for membrane extraction, protein purification, and NMR sample preparation.

Escherichia coli↗
PubMed1992

Modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors: application to dopamine, adrenaline, serotonin, acetylcholine, and mammalian opsin receptors.

Hydropathicity analysis of 39 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) reveals seven hydrophobic stretches corresponding to membrane spanning alpha-helices. The alignment of the primary sequences shows a high degree of homology in the GPCR transmembrane regions. 3D models of 39 GPCRs were generated using the refined model of bacteriorhodopsin as a template. Five cationic neurotransmitter receptors (serotonergic 5-HT2, dopaminergic D2, muscarinic m2, adrenergic alpha 2 and beta 2 receptors) were taken as prototypes and studied in detail. The 3D models of the cationic neurotransmitter receptors, together with their primary structure comparison, indicate that the agonist binding site is located near the extracellular face of the receptor and involves residues of the membrane-spanning helices 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. The binding site consists of a negatively-charged Asp located at the middle of transmembrane helix 3 and a hydrophobic pocket containing conserved aromatic residues on helices 4, 5, 6, and 7. To define the precise receptor-ligand interactions, the natural neurotransmitters were docked into the binding sites. Residues responsible for the affinity, selectivity, and eventually stereospecificity of dopamine, adrenaline, noradrenaline, serotonin, and acetylcholine for their receptors were identified. The ligands are involved in electrostatic interactions as well as hydrogen bonds and specific hydrophobic aromatic interactions. All the GPCRs possess invariant hinge residues, which might be responsible for a conformational change during agonist binding and therefore influence dissociation and association of G-proteins to the receptors. The role of hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds in the conformational change of the receptors, modulating the coupling to the G-protein, is discussed with regard to these residues. The models are in agreement with published data obtained from mutagenesis and labeling studies and represent important working hypotheses to direct future mutagenesis studies. They also enable structure-activity relationship studies and more rational drug design. The 3D models of other G-protein-coupled receptors have been generated in a similar way.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Recognition of privileged structures by G-protein coupled receptors.

Privileged structures are ligand substructures that are widely used to generate high-affinity ligands for more than one type of receptor. To explain this, we surmised that there must be some common feature in the target proteins. For a set of class A GPCRs, we found a good correlation between conservation patterns of residues in the ligand binding pocket and the privileged structure fragments in class A GPCR ligands. A major part of interior surface of the common ligand binding pocket of class A receptors, identified in many GPCRs, is lined with variable residues that are responsible for selectivity in ligand recognition, while other regions, typically located deeper into the binding pocket, are more conserved and retain a predominantly hydrophobic and aromatic character. The latter is reflected in the chemical nature of most GPCR privileged structures and is proposed to be the common feature that is recognized by the privileged structures. Further, we find that this subpocket is conserved even in distant orthologs within the class A family. Three pairs of ligands recognizing widely different receptor types were docked into receptor models of their target receptors utilizing available structure- activity relationships and mutagenesis data. For each pair of ligands, the ligand-receptor complexes reveal that the nature of the privileged structure binding pocket is conserved between the two complexes, in support of our hypothesis. Only part of the privileged structures can be accommodated within the conserved subpocket. Some contacts are established between the privileged structure and the nonconserved parts of the binding pocket. This implies that any one particular privileged structure can target only a subset of receptors, those complementary to the full privileged structure. Our hypothesis leads to a valuable novelty in that ligand libraries can be designed without any foreknowledge of the structure of the endogenous ligand, which in turn means that even orphan receptors can in principle now be addressed as potential drug targets.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

The physicochemical challenges of designing multiple ligands.

Compounds designed to bind more than one target can provide a therapeutic benefit relative to highly target-selective ligands. The physicochemical properties of designed multiple ligands were found to be less druglike than those for preclinical compounds in general. These properties are controlled by the superfamily to which the targets belong and the lead discovery strategy that was followed. The properties for peptide G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands were the least favorable for oral delivery, whereas transporter, monoamine GPCR, and oxidase ligands were the most druglike. The lead discovery strategy, framework combination or screening, exerts a profound influence on the property values. Combining the frameworks from two selective ligands often results in large, complex dual ligands, but druglike ligands can be achieved if the degree of framework overlap is maximized and the size of the selective ligands minimized. For some target combinations, a screening approach may provide a route to smaller, less complex leads.

Carrier Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Synthesis of cyclic phosphonate analogues of (lyso)phosphatidic acid using a ring-closing metathesis reaction.

We describe a versatile and efficient method for the preparation of acyloxy-substituted six-membered cyclic phosphonates using the ring-closing metathesis. After closure, the key cyclic phosphonate intermediate was dihydroxylated and converted to a new class of conformationally constrained PA and LPA analogues. The oleoyloxy-substituted cyclic phosphonate 4 had unique receptor-selective properties as a ligand, showing partial activation of the LPA2 GPCR and weak antagonism of the LPA1 GPCR.

Cyclization↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Coupling interaction between thromboxane A2 receptor and alpha-13 subunit of guanine nucleotide-binding protein.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form a large superfamily of membrane proteins that play an essential role in modulating many vital physiological events, such as cell communication, neurotransmission, sensory perception, and chemotaxis. Understanding of the 3D (dimensional) structures of these receptors and their binding interactions with G proteins will help in the design of drugs for the treatment of GPCR-related diseases. By means of the approach of structural bioinformatics, the 3D structures of human alpha-13 subunit of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G alpha 13) and human thromboxane A2 (TXA2) receptor were developed. The former plays an important role in the control of cell growth that may serve as a prototypical G protein; the latter is a target for nitric oxide-mediated desensitization that may serve as a prototypical GPCR. On the basis of the 3D models, their coupling interactions were investigated via docking studies. It has been found that the two proteins are coupled with each other mainly through the interaction between the minigene of G alpha 13 and the 3rd intracellular loop of the TXA2 receptor, consistent with the existing deduction in the literatures. However, it has also been observed via a close view that some residues of the TXA2 receptor that are sequentially far away but spatially quite close to the loop region are also involved in forming hydrogen bonds with the minigene of G alpha 13. These findings may provide useful information for conducting mutagenesis and reveal the molecular mechanism how the human TXA2 receptor interact with G alpha 13 to activate intracellular signaling. The findings may also provide useful insights for stimulating new therapeutic approaches by manipulating the interaction of the receptor with the relevant G proteins.

Allosteric Site↗