Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Berkeley”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

From rhetoric to reality: barriers faced by Health For All initiatives.

The last two decades have witnessed an upsurge in the development and implementation of 'Health For All-type' initiatives in many parts of the world. However, despite the popularity of the approach, barriers and constraints to the fulfillment of their remit still persist, making it difficult for them to achieve the potential originally envisaged. Drawing upon considerable empirical work while evaluating the European Healthy City projects and English Health Action Zones, this paper explores the differences between barriers and constraints and then focuses on barriers as they manifest themselves in England. It distinguishes between cultural barriers, stemming from different philosophical, organisational, and professional/experiential cultures, and political barriers, stemming from both party political and realpolitik concerns. It discusses how these barriers often operate together, compounding their individual impacts, with detrimental effects for Health For All initiatives. Consequently, while the prevailing rhetoric appears to promote an alternative, and more appropriate, vision of how health can be maintained and enhanced, these barriers effectively function to sustain the hegemony of the status quo which was, and is, based on a different and outdated vision. We argue that acknowledging the continuous persistence of these barriers is an essential first step towards turning the prevailing health-related rhetoric into reality.

Community Participation↗
PubMed2006

From rhetoric to reality: A systemic approach to understanding the constraints faced by Health For All initiatives in England.

The increased appreciation of the effects socio-ecological factors have on health, witnessed over the last few decades, has given rise to many international, national, and local Health For All (HFA) initiatives tasked with addressing them. However, such initiatives have had to operate within environments which were not specifically designed for them or for the new social (rather than medical) perspective on health they were based upon. As a result, they have been facing significant barriers and constraints to fulfilling their mission. This paper explores the constraints which are imposed on such initiatives by the various environments within which they are nested. Drawing upon our experience in evaluating European Healthy City (HC) projects and English Health Action Zones (HAZs), we develop a dynamic conceptual model which shows how the national, governmental policy, interorganisational, organisational, and initiative environments relate with each other and their cumulative effects on initiatives. We argue that this model, and the principles on which it is based, can be used constructively to identify constraints facing HFA-type initiatives in many countries. We use our case study of English HCs and HAZs to illustrate the applicability of the model in a particular national context. We, first, interpret the model to reflect differences and similarities between their respective environments and trace the sources of the different constraints they encountered. We, then, show how an alternative structural configuration could enable some of these constraints to be eliminated. We argue that what is needed for HFA initiatives to be able to fulfill their brief in full is for governments to rethink existing organisational structures and update them to match the evolution of ideas on health which have emerged over the last decades.

England↗
PubMed1988

Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin prophylaxis for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.

The safety and efficacy of parenteral prophylaxis with either cefotetan or cefoxitin were evaluated in a prospective, randomized study of 355 subjects undergoing abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. Each subject received either a single 1 gm dose of cefotetan intravenously 30 to 60 minutes before operation or three 2 gm doses of cefoxitin, the first 30 to 60 minutes before operation and subsequent doses 6 and 12 hours later. Prophylaxis was successful in 69 of 70 (98.6%) receiving cefotetan and 32 of 33 (97.0%) receiving cefoxitin who underwent vaginal hysterectomy. Prophylaxis was successful in 160 of 169 (94.7%) receiving cefotetan and in 79 of 83 (95.2%) receiving cefoxitin who underwent abdominal hysterectomy. Both drugs were well tolerated and without serious side effects or complications. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that a single 1 gm dose of cefotetan given before operation is as safe and effective as a multiple-dosing regimen of cefoxitin in subjects undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and in those undergoing abdominal hysterectomy at institutions where prophylaxis is indicated.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1987

Primary cesarean section and subsequent fertility.

The incidence of infertility after primary cesarean section (study group) was compared to an age- and parity-matched control group who underwent vaginal delivery during 1978 at The New York Hospital. Secondary infertility occurred in 17/291 (5.8%) of the study group and 5/279 (1.8%) of the control group (p less than 0.03). Excluding those who practiced contraception and those who underwent sterilization, this difference is still significant (p less than 0.02). Excluding those patients with a history of infertility prior to the 1978 birth, there was still a trend to increased subsequent infertility in the cesarean section group although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p less than 0.06). The patients with infertility did not have a higher incidence of postpartum endomyometritis, prolonged rupture of the membranes, or abnormal placentation. The causes of the secondary infertility could not always be directly related to cesarean section; the concept of an "infertility threshold" will be discussed.

Cesarean Section↗