Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Alveolar Process”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Microstructured dental implants and palatal mucosal grafts in cleft patients: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: In cleft patients, implant dentistry has become an integral part of oral rehabilitation. However, a lack of keratinized mucosa is found in many cases which may have adverse effects on the long-term success of dental implants with microstructured surfaces. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether mucogingival surgery is of value in the treatment of these patients. PATIENTS: Between 1991 and 2002, a total of 35 microstructured dental implants were inserted in 32 cleft patients. In 18 patients, vestibular scars extended to the rim of the marginal mucosa of the implants and the gingiva of the adjacent teeth. To enhance the soft tissue condition, mucogingival surgery was performed using palatal mucosal grafts. METHODS: In May 2002, 29 implants and 16 mucosal grafts were evaluated. Assessment included radiological and clinical parameters. RESULTS: Three implants were lost. Most mucosal grafts showed shrinkage of up to 30%. Clinical and radiological parameters, however, showed results that were very similar to those from non-cleft patients. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that keratinized mucosal grafts show long-term success in the cleft region as well. Moreover, it may be concluded that a combination of dental implants with a rough surface and palatal mucosal grafts can be recommended for oral rehabilitation of cleft patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy.

Achieving predictable aesthetic outcomes following the planned removal of a natural tooth suffering from structural, endodontic, or periodontal compromise depends on a multitude of factors that, once identified, guide the implant team in selecting the surgical and prosthetic treatment options best suited for the individual clinical scenario. This article presents pertinent information regarding systematic patient evaluation and special treatment planning considerations for patients facing the loss of a single tooth in an area of high aesthetic importance. The rationale for and details of performing the Bio-Col site preservation technique at the time of tooth removal; guidelines for immediate versus delayed implant placement; selection and sequencing of site-development procedures according to the types of alveolar ridge defects encountered following tooth removal despite the use of site preservation; and a description of prosthetic techniques necessary for the successful management of single-tooth extraction sites in areas of aesthetic concern also are reviewed.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed2004

Horizontal alveolar distraction of the narrow maxillary ridge for implant placement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report was to describe a surgical technique for performing horizontal alveolar distraction of the knife-edge maxillary ridge. PATIENT AND METHODS: The patient was a 17-year-old woman with atrophy of the alveolar rim in the anterior upper jaw, which had inadequate width for implant placement. The transport segment was constructed by the osteotomy of the labial cortex of the alveolus. A transport plate of a distractor (LEAD system; Stryker Leibinger, Kalamazoo, MI) was placed on the transport segment. The distraction rod was inserted horizontally, and put in contact with the palatal cortex at the top. A base plate was not placed. RESULTS: The alveolar distraction was successfully performed to gain 6.0 mm in width and 0.5 mm in height, allowing placement of three 14-mm implants. All the implants were integrated so as to support the prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar distraction can be useful for augmenting the narrow ridge horizontally and placement of implants.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Treatment planning for multiunit restorations--the use of diagnostic planning to predict implant and esthetic results in patients with congenitally missing teeth.

Patients afflicted with congenitally missing teeth are a unique patient population for consideration of treatment with osseointegrated implants. Frequently, these patients have limited development of the alveolar process and differences in spatial position relative to the opposing arch, which places emphasis on ancillary treatment with orthodontics and oral surgery. A thorough diagnostic workup should include an interdisciplinary approach to ensure optimal treatment and timing of treatment in those who are developing. This article outlines considerations for treating these types of patients and scenarios of treatment paths frequently taken to restore the partially dentate and edentulous to esthetics and function.

Anodontia↗
PubMed2005

Radiographic evaluation of alveolar distraction osteogenesis: analysis of 60 cases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) technique for vertical reconstruction of atrophy alveolar ridges in partially edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 vertical distraction osteogenesis procedures were performed in 55 patients. Two panoramic radiographies were performed in all patients, one the day before the beginning of distraction, and one after consolidation period, 12 weeks postoperatively. The radiographic analysis consisted of obtaining the amount of the vertical bone gain (VBG) in each radiography. For this, we obtained initially the magnification factor (MF) of each panoramic radiography by dividing the real size (RS) of the activation rod among the image size (IS) of the activation rod. After this, to obtain the VGB, we measured initially the length of the distracton preactivation (LD1), which consisted of the distance between the superior portion of the basal plate and the superior portion of the transport plate, multiplying by the MF. Then, we measured the length of the distraction postactivation (LD2), using the same method described before, in radiographies performed 12 weeks postoperatively. The VBG was obtained using the following formula: VBG = LD2 - LD1. The results were applied to descriptive statistical analysis. Complications were also investigated during all of the treatments. RESULTS: The mean alveolar distraction achieved in 60 cases was 6.27 mm (range, 0 to 10.83 mm). According to the region treated, 51.6% were in the posterior mandible (mean VBG, 4.60 mm), 36.66% were in the anterior maxilla (mean VBG, 7.46 mm), 8.33% were in the anterior mandible (mean VBG, 6.73 mm), and 3.33% were in the posterior maxilla (mean VBG, 6.32 mm). The overall rate of complications that compromised the success of the technique was 8.44%. The increased radiopacity of the distracted region could be observed in the 12-week period after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The ADO technique was demonstrated to be an effective tool to treat vertical defects of the alveolar ridge with a success rate of 91.66%. Our radiographic analysis seems to be an important tool in verifying the technique as well as planning implant placement after ADO.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Maxilla sinus grafting with marine algae derived bone forming material: a clinical report of long-term results.

PURPOSE: Autogenous bone grafting continues to be considered the gold standard for sinus grafting. For the past 15 years the author has used an alternative graft material and followed-up the input/output statistic of implants to evaluate if this material results similar to the autogenous bone graft. Histomorphometric evaluations of graft materials show how much new bone is formed and if the graft material is resorbed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study we used a marine derived carbonated red algae that is chemically converted into hydroxyapatite (HA). This material is distributed worldwide as the Communauté Européenne approved material AlgiPore (Dentsply Friadent, Mannheim, Germany), as the US Food and Drug Administration approved material C GRAFT (The Clinician Preference LLC, Golden, CO), and the Russian approved material AlgOss (Unexim Co, Moscow, Russia). A total of 209 sinus grafts were performed on 118 patients who presented with a severely resorbed maxillary alveolar process with 1 to 5 mm (mean, 3.6 mm) of remaining bone. The available bone was comparable to Class D bone as described by Simion et al. After 6 months implants were placed and 6 months later the implants were loaded. RESULTS: From September 5, 1990, to September 1, 2004, the author performed 209 sinus grafts on 118 patients. The longest observation period of loaded implants in this study is 156 months (13 years). Implant loss was 27 out of 614 loaded implants (4.4%), showing a survival rate of 95.6%. Smokers and women over 50 are included. Although AlgiPore/C GRAFT/AlgOss (ACA) undergoes a resorption process, we found only 14% volume loss after 6.4 months compared with 49.5% after 6 months when autogenous bone was used. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study of over 14 years shows once again that the sinus lift procedure with grafting of the sinus floor and subsequent implant placement is a proven method. This 14-year longitudinal study shows that the marine derived HA material ACA in a mixture with approximately 10% autogenous collector bone and blood or platelet rich plasma is able to enhance enough new bone in 6 months to allow implant osseointegration after 6 more months with a high implant survival rate.

Absorbable Implants↗
PubMed2006

Alveolar bone graft for patients with cleft lip/palate using bone particles and titanium mesh: A quantitative study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the bone volume, height, and width that can be obtained in alveolar ridge augmentation using titanium mesh and autogenous bone particles in patients with cleft lip/palate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 15 patients with cleft lip/palate requiring tertiary bone graft for implant therapy. Computed tomography (CT) scans were taken before removing the mesh, from 1 to 21 months after bone grafting. Forty-three reconstructed images corresponding to the positions for implant placement were selected for this study. The percent defect filled with bone (%BONE), defined as the percentage of newly formed bone in the space created by the mesh, was measured for image analyses. In linear analyses, 4 parameters were used: increased bone height (IBH), percent increased bone height (%IBH), increased bone width (IBW), and percent increased bone width (%IBW). Factors influencing the quantitative data and the clinical courses of placed implants were also explored. RESULTS: The average %BONE was 91.1%. IBH averaged 4.4 mm, whereas %IBH averaged 88.5%. IBW averaged 4.6 mm, whereas %IBW averaged 86.4%. Little correlation was present between the quantitative data and patient age, or time interval. A significant correlation was identified between the data for span of the grafted area and %BONE (correlation coefficient value = -0.36). However, the diminishing rate was very low. No implants were lost postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and autogenous bone particles from the anterior iliac crest has very high predictability as a preimplant procedure in patients with cleft lip/palate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Fixed partial denture supported by all-ceramic copings: a clinical report.

This clinical report describes the prosthodontic treatment of a partially edentulous patient who had a surgical closure of bilateral cleft of the lips, alveolar processes, and palate. The prosthodontic treatment included the fabrication of a "telescopic" fixed partial denture supported by reinforced all-ceramic primary copings. The use of all-ceramic primary copings, rather than gold copings, offers an alternative fixed partial denture and improves the esthetic result in certain clinical situations.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Rehabilitation of the severely atrophied maxilla by horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy (HLFO).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of the horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy (HLFO) as a preprosthetic operation technique for implant insertion in the extremely atrophied maxilla. STUDY DESIGN: 36 patients (8 male, 28 female, average age 57.6 years) underwent HLFO combined with iliac crest bone grafting. They were divided into 2 groups: group A with 12 patients who simultaneously received 100 implants; group B with 24 patients where 176 implants were inserted in 18 patients in a second-stage procedure. Clinical and radiographic outcome with regard to implant osseointegration, alveolar bone height in the canine and molar regions, peri-implant bone loss and satisfaction of patients (esthetics, masticatory function, overall treatment) were investigated in all cases. RESULTS: The overall 2-year failure-free fraction of implants was 95.5%; the 5-year failure-free fraction was 89.3%. In the 1-step group the 2-year and 5-year failure-free fractions were 95.9% and 86.9%, respectively, in the 2-step group 95.0% and 91.3% (log rank test P=.57). A total of 27 implants were lost during the entire follow-up: 14 in 6 patients of the 1-stage and 13 in 9 patients of the 2-stage group. The mean loss of alveolar bone after augmentation in the canine and molar regions was almost equal in both groups (overall means for the 2 regions 3.67 +/- 2.77 and 4.42 +/- 2.72 mm, respectively). The relationship between the jaws and thereby the esthetic profile could be improved in all cases. All patients were satisfied with the dental rehabilitation and the achieved new esthetic appearance. CONCLUSIONS: HLFO combined with iliac bone grafting is a feasible preprosthetic technique prior to implant insertion in cases of severe atrophy of the maxillary alveolar ridge, leading to satisfying implant survival and rehabilitation of function.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Surgical and prosthodontic reconstruction of the severely handicapped edentulous patient.

There is among some prosthodontists a negative attitude toward preprosthetic reconstructive surgery because of previous poor experience with reconstructive or preprosthetic surgical procedures. Such experiences may have resulted from the limitations of techniques previously used; and, therefore, the prosthodontist may resort to conventional prosthodontic techniques. There are, however, limits to what can be achieved with special impression techniques, tooth form and placement, and so forth. This article was written not only to present the rationale of current techniques but to encourage the prosthodontist to consider and present to the severely handicapped edentulous patient the choice of preprosthetic reconstructive surgery.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed1997

Judson C. Hickey Scientific Writing Award Winner. Fabrication of a guide for nonradiographic evaluation of bone contour.

The determination of bony contours at the site of implant placement aids the surgeon and the restoring dentist in treatment planning a patient's care. Although radiographic evaluations that use cross-sectional views are helpful, they are often expensive and not available in most dentists' offices. This article describes a technique for the fabrication of a guide for nonradiographic evaluation of bone contour. Bone contours are probed and transferred to a sectioned cast by the use of a guide.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1998

Preimplant surgery of the bony tissues.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The rationale of preimplant surgery is the creation of an environment that is favorable to the function and long-term survival of endosseous dental implants. Indications for this type of surgery depend on anatomic conditions, implant type, and design of the superstructure. One essential requirement for successful implantation is the presence of sufficient bone in which the implants are placed. Besides the quantity of bone, the quality of bone and the intermaxillary relation play an important role. PURPOSE: This article presents an overview of several techniques for specific implant conditions.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed1998

Surgical considerations and possible shortcomings of host sites.

Outcomes of implant therapy are based on diagnostic, surgical, and prosthetic procedures. Factors that are important to implant success with Brånemark system surgical protocols that are addressed in this article include patient selection, minimal bone dimensions needed for implant placement, desired implant position, and bone augmentation and grafting procedures.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed1997

Atypical odontalgia misdiagnosed as odontogenic pain: a case report and discussion of treatment.

Atypical odontalgia is characterized by prolonged periods of throbbing or burning pain in the teeth or alveolar process, which occurs in the absence of any identifiable odontogenic etiology. The pain may be bilateral and change in location. This article presents two cases of atypical odontalgia that were misdiagnosed and initially treated as pain of odontogenic origin. A therapeutic regimen of tricyclic antidepressants alleviated the pain in one patient and was unsuccessful in the second. These two cases demonstrate the importance of having a thorough knowledge of both odontogenic and nonodontogenic causes of orofacial pain as well as the need for careful diagnosis before undertaking any treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Peripheral ameloblastoma: report of a case with malignant aspect.

Peripheral ameloblastoma is a very rare tumour with histological characteristics similar to those of the centrally located ameloblastoma. It appears in the gum and in the alveolar process of the jaws. We report a case of tumour of the left maxillary region, near the canine area. Histologically it presented itself with follicles and nests of cells with a trabecular architectural pattern. High mitotic index and clear images of perineural infiltration were present. The diagnosis was peripheral ameloblastoma with malignant aspects. At 12-month follow-up no local recurrence was noted.

Ameloblastoma↗