Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Estramustine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 757 records · Page 42Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

"Skittish" Abca2 knockout mice display tremor, hyperactivity, and abnormal myelin ultrastructure in the central nervous system.

The ATP-binding cassette transporter 2 (ABCA2) is an endolysosomal protein most highly expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system tissues and macrophages. Previous studies indicated its role in cholesterol/steroid (estramustine, estradiol, and progesterone) trafficking/sequestration, oxidative stress response, and Alzheimer's disease. Developmental studies have shown its expression during macrophage and oligodendrocyte differentiation, processes requiring membrane growth. To determine the in vivo function(s) of this transporter, we generated a knockout mouse from a gene-targeted disruption of the murine ABCA2 gene. Knockout males and females are viable and fertile. However, a non-Mendelian inheritance pattern was shown among male progeny of heterozygous crosses. Compared to wild-type and heterozygous littermates, knockout mice displayed a tremor without ataxia, hyperactivity, and reduced body weight; the latter two phenotypes were more marked in females than in males. This sexual disparity suggests a role for ABCA2 in hormone-dependent neurological and/or developmental pathways. Myelin sheath thickness in the spinal cords of knockout mice was greatly increased compared to that in wild-type mice, while a significant reduction in myelin membrane periodicity (compaction) was observed in both spinal cords and cerebra of knockout mice. Loss of ABCA2 function in vivo resulted in abnormal myelin compaction in spinal cord and cerebrum, an ultrastructural defect that we propose to be the cause of the phenotypic tremor.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗
PubMed2003

Role of chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Old issues, recent advances and new perspectives.

Prostate cancer that grows despite castrate levels of testosterone and that no longer responds to any form of hormonal manipulation and for which nonhormonal approaches are required, can be precisely defined as hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Until recently, there has been no standard chemotherapeutic approach for HRPC. In this article recent advances in the treatment of HRPC using chemotherapeutic regimens are critically reviewed. We performed a MEDLINE search of the published reports from 1995 to 2002 including chemotherapy in the treatment of HRPC. We critically reviewed a total of 84 clinical trials, of which only 6 were phase III trials, most of the studies being phase II trials. Various chemotherapeutic agents have been used. To date, the major benefits of chemotherapy in the treatment of HRPC are palliative in nature, in terms of reduction of pain and use of analgesics and improvement of performance status, as followed in the most recent trials. There is a promising activity of new drug combinations, such as vinca alkaloids and taxanes in association with estramustine. Mitoxantrone, although with a limited activity, has been shown to provide improvement in pain and quality of life for the patients. Several studies suffer from methodological deficits, such as small number of patients, heterogeneity of enrolled groups or no definitive response criteria. Further phase III studies are necessary to better evaluate the efficacy of the different regimens.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Single-agent chemotherapy with docetaxel significantly reduces PSA levels in patients with high-grade localized prostate cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in the management of prostate cancer in patients with androgen-independent metastatic disease, however, a survival benefit has not been demonstrated yet. Docetaxel alone or in combination with estramustine has been shown to exhibit a high level of activity in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. To date there are only few reports on chemotherapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel as a single agent given prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has been evaluated in 5 patients presenting with Gleason score 8 prostate cancers at biopsy. RESULTS: The mean reduction in prostate-specific antigen levels in the 5 patients was 66.5% (range 47.6-94.0%). Histology after RRP yielded pT2N0MxR0 prostate cancers in all subjects. Testosterone and secretoneurin levels were not significantly affected by docetaxel monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to RRP is still experimental, the dramatic prostate-specific antigen decrease during chemotherapy and the pathologic findings after radical prostatectomy are encouraging. Studies including larger number of patients will have to confirm the present results.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Contemporary chemotherapy issues for children with brainstem gliomas.

Radiotherapy has remained the mainstay of treatment for children with intrinsic, diffuse pontine tumors in spite of over 20 years of clinical trials attempting to validate the additional role of chemotherapy. Conventional phase II clinical trials conducted in patients with recurrent or progressive brainstem gliomas using single chemotherapy agents such as cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, cisplatin, etoposide and thiotepa or combinations of chemotherapy agents have produced low response rates in the range of 15-20%. Preradiotherapy chemotherapy phase II trials in newly diagnosed patients have yielded similar results with a therapeutic window as long as 4 months. Preliminary data from protocols employing high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support have also met with disappointment. The one published phase III trial conducted by the Children's Cancer Study Group comparing radiotherapy with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CCNU, vincristine and prednisone) failed to establish a benefit to multimodality therapy. Current studies include the use of radiosensitizing chemotherapy (carboplatin, estramustine and cisplatin) in newly diagnosed patients and more intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials. Major advances in our management await insights into molecular vulnerability of high-grade gliomas.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1985

High-dose medroxyprogesterone in the treatment of advanced therapy-resistant prostatic carcinoma.

In a preliminary study we have administered medroxyprogesterone acetate to 20 patients with advanced metastatic prostatic cancer, who no longer responded to previous therapy. The dose used was 1,000 mg intramuscularly three times a week for 5 weeks, followed by 1,000 mg weekly until progression. All patients had undergone orchidectomy or had been treated with estrogens. 15 patients also had received estramustine, and another 3 patients, chemotherapy. A partial response occurred in 4 patients for periods of up to 18 months, and stable disease was seen in 2 patients. 7 more patients reported subjective response lasting less than 2 months. The disease progressed in the remaining 7 patients. Adverse reactions were tolerable. Our results are promising and indicate that medroxyprogesterone in high doses may have an effect in therapy-resistant cases of prostatic carcinoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1985

A reevaluation of nonhormonal cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma.

The palliative role of nonhormonal cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of endocrine-resistant prostatic carcinoma has not been established. Conventional means of quantifying tumor response are most frequently not applicable in this disease because of the lack of measurable objective parameters to allow for a reliable estimation of antitumor effects. While this problem is not unique to prostatic carcinoma, this review illustrates its magnitude in this disease. Only approximately 5% of patients studied fulfill the various criteria for complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or both, while the vast majority of patients reported as responders are actually in the stable disease category. Stable disease is highly questionable as an indicator of antitumor response and should not be used as a criterion for response in conventional phase II studies unless it is convincingly demonstrated that it occurs as a result of treatment. A study design that may allow a more reliable assessment of the value of the stable disease category is described in the text. More effective means for assessing tumor responses and better instruments to measure aspects of quality of life are needed. Review of several prospective randomized clinical trials showed that no treatment program tested during the last decade resulted in a survival advantage when compared with a concurrently treated control group. Furthermore, in two such trials, four different single chemotherapeutic agents widely used in the treatment of this disease (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, estramustine phosphate, and streptozocin) either alone or in combination, did not produce any prolongation of survival when compared to a no chemotherapy (standard treatment) control arm. Survival curves for endocrine-resistant patients fall within a relatively narrow and possibly predictable range that may be used as an additional endpoint in conjunction with response (CRs and PRs only) in phase II trials. More definitive evidence of therapeutic efficacy in this disease should derive from phase III trials using survival as one of the major endpoints. Because of the poor results observed with chemotherapy thus far, we suggest that the appropriate control arm for phase III testing in endocrine-resistant patients continues to be a no chemotherapy control arm consisting of a best symptomatic care or a uniformly applied second-line endocrine manipulation.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

New standards in the chemotherapy of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is a major issue in Western countries and the second leading cause of cancer death in North American men. In the prostate-specific antigen era, most HRPCs are currently diagnosed in asymptomatic patients based on biochemical failure, with increasing demand for active treatment. Until recently, chemotherapy for HRPC patients was not considered a standard of care due to the absence of clear data evidencing an overall survival benefit. In fact, few Phase III studies conducted in the 1980s and early 1990s had documented a superiority over corticosteroids alone in terms of biochemical response (declines in serum prostate-specific antigen levels) and quality of life, but not survival. Due to their impact on pain control, mitoxantrone and prednisone were long considered the best regimen for symptomatic HRPC patients. In recent years, more chemotherapeutic agents have been tested, among which the microtubule inhibitors (vinca alkaloids and taxanes) have obtained the most promising results in Phase II trials and have entered Phase III testing. Two well-designed randomized trials have changed this scenario. Both compared docetaxel (with or without estramustine) against mitoxantrone and prednisone, and demonstrated a significant advantage not only in terms of response, pain control and quality of life, but also in terms of overall survival. Which patients need to be treated, the regimen of choice and duration of chemotherapy will be the next questions to be answered in the coming years in the field of HRPC, along with the role of new signal transduction inhibitors and other targeted therapies.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2005

Achieving treatment goals for hormone-refractory prostate cancer with chemotherapy.

The belief that hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is a chemotherapy-resistant disease has been effectively refuted by the results of two recent randomized phase III trials. The TAX327 trial compared weekly docetaxel, every-3-weeks (Q3W) docetaxel, and Q3W mitoxantrone plus prednisone in 1,006 patients with HRPC, and results demonstrated that survival was significantly longer with a docetaxel-based regimen than with mitoxantrone. That trial demonstrated that only Q3W docetaxel was significantly superior to mitoxantrone with respect to overall survival. Quality of life was also superior in the docetaxel groups. In the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 9916 trial, 674 men with progressive HRPC were randomized to 3-week cycles of docetaxel plus estramustine or mitoxantrone plus prednisone. Overall and disease-free survival times were significantly longer in the docetaxel arm. Collectively, the results of these trials demonstrate that survival can be significantly improved with chemotherapy in patients with HRPC to an extent that is comparable with the survival benefits seen in other cancers considered sensitive to chemotherapy such as breast cancer. Among various research tasks in HRPC is the definition of potential surrogate end points for survival, which will facilitate the conduct of pivotal trials. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate and changes in PSA constructs (i.e., PSA doubling time and PSA velocity) are promising potential surrogate end points for future trials and are being actively evaluated at the present time. Until there is clear demonstration of a surrogate role for these alternative end points, survival remains the appropriate end point for phase III trials in HRPC. There is a need for safe and effective second- and third-line regimens for patients progressing after docetaxel, and these patients should enter clinical trials designed for this population. Mitoxantrone, vinorelbine, the platinum analogue satraplatin, and epothilone are among compounds that require careful testing in this setting. The addition of targeted therapies, such as the endothelin receptor antagonist, atrasentan, and angiogenesis inhibitors, such as thalidomide and bevacizumab, to docetaxel-based therapy is being evaluated. High-dose calcitriol may also be an effective addition to docetaxel. The extensive effort devoted to the evaluation of chemotherapy and other systemic modalities of treatment of HRPC is likely to yield additional clinical benefit for patients, making HRPC a more manageable, less lethal, and less debilitating disease.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Progressing prostate carcinoma.

In the Karnell Cancer Center Grand Rounds, we present a patient who underwent radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, but had positive margins and subsequently developed local recurrence and then systemic disease. Pathologic and radiologic aspects of his disease are discussed. Therapeutic options at different stages of the disease are examined from the point of view of the urologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist. The surgical portion of the discussion focuses on the selection of initial therapy. Both the selection of surgical candidates and choice of pre- or post-operative therapy in patients can be aided by prognostic tools looking at several variables, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score of the tumor, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular invasion, and lymph node involvement. Low-risk patients can be treated with monotherapy, such as radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, prostate brachytherapy, or cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Higher risk patients may require adjuvant and possibly neoadjuvant therapy in addition. The radiation portion of the discussion focuses on the use of radiation therapy as salvage for relapsing disease. Of particular importance is the point that treating high-risk patients whose PSA levels have started to rise but are less than 1 ng/ml results in a long-term PSA control rate as high as 75%, but that limiting the use of salvage radiation therapy to patients with high PSA levels or biopsy confirmation of local recurrence in the face of a negative bone scan results in biochemical long-term control of less than 40%. In the medical oncology part of the discussion, the major focus is on the use of chemotherapy to treat patients whose disease has become resistant to hormonal therapy. Mitoxantrone plus a corticosteroid has been found to offer significant palliation for such patients. Combination therapy with estramustine plus taxanes, other microtubule inhibitors, or other agents such as topoisomerase II inhibitors, has been found to cause shrinkage of measurable soft tissue disease and diminution of serum PSA levels. The development of effective hormonal and chemotherapeutic drugs for treatment of metastatic disease has led to new interest in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

State-of-the-art treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Initial therapy for advanced prostate cancer includes androgen ablation by surgical or medical castration. Still, nearly all men with metastases will progress to hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved agents for the treatment of HRPC include mitoxantrone and estramustine, although the vinca alkaloids and the taxanes have shown promising activity in single-agent phase II trials. Combinations of these agents induce a biochemical response in greater than 50% of patients, but the median duration of response is approximately 6 months. Overall survival of patients treated with these combinations is approximately 18-24 months. Studies are ongoing to develop novel therapies that target specific molecular pathways or mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance. Novel agents under development include growth factor receptor inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotides, bisphosphonates, and cell differentiating agents. Evaluation and incorporation of these agents into existing treatment regimens will guide us in the development of more active regimens in the treatment of HRPC.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1991

Flutamide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in advanced prostatic cancer.

Flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogenic drug devoid of hormonal agonist activity, is used in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. In previously untreated patients, flutamide 750 mg daily given alone is of comparable efficacy to diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol) 1 or 3 mg daily and estramustine 560 or 840 mg daily, but has the potential advantages of fewer cardiovascular effects and maintenance of some sexual potency. Its greatest therapeutic potential is as a component of combination androgen blockade, where administration with an agonist analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH)] in both initial uncontrolled and randomised studies increased survival time relative to GnRH agonist monotherapy or orchidectomy. Subsequent multicentre trials, however, have been unable to confirm an improvement in survival time. Thus, while there seems to be little doubt that flutamide prevents the initial disease flare caused by GnRH agonists, an improvement in remission rate and survival remains contentious. Flutamide is generally well tolerated and is suitable monotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer who wish to preserve sexual potency. However, full assessment of the role of combination androgen blockade awaits publication of the final results of ongoing multicentre trials.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Prostate cancer, Incidence, management and outcomes.

The incidence of prostate carcinoma in the US now appears to be declining slightly, as a consequence of removal of prevalent cases from the population by screening. Screening for serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels has been improved by the use of PSA transformations including PSA density, PSA velocity and age-specific PSA reference ranges. The ratio of free to total PSA may increase the specificity of single serum PSA evaluations without decreasing its sensitivity for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Despite the proliferation of risk assessment tools and nomograms, the optimal therapy for localised disease remains controversial, and the usefulness of radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy (either external beam or brachytherapy) has not been tested prospectively against watchful waiting. However, watchful waiting is probably more appropriate for men whose life expectancy is less than 10 to 15 years and/or who have low grade tumours. In patients with metastatic disease, androgen deprivation remains the mainstay of treatment. Whether or not the addition of an antiandrogen prolongs survival remains controversial. Intermittent androgen deprivation appears to be one means of avoiding continuous androgen deprivation and possibly decreasing adverse effects, although its efficacy remains to be proven. For patients whose disease progresses after combined androgen blockade, withdrawal of antiandrogen is now considered mandatory. Tremendous heterogeneity exists among patients who progress after antiandrogen withdrawal, so that patients previously considered resistant to hormones may in fact retain some hormonal sensitivity to second- or third-line hormone therapy. For patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, a variety of options exist, including the use of estramustine combinations, suramin, mitoxantrone and doxorubicin combinations. Despite these options, there is presently no standard of care, and clinical trials should receive priority. Palliative interventions, including the use of corticosteroids, radiopharmaceuticals and external beam radiation therapy, should not be overlooked.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Oral chemotherapy in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Oral chemotherapy has become a major component of the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The recognition that prostate cancer grows very slowly and must be treated continuously with active agents has led to the development of several therapeutic regimens. These regimens employ oral agents such as estramustine, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide, as they can be taken on a daily basis at home by the patients. These regimens have demonstrated activity in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer; declines in both prostate specific antigen and soft tissue lesions have been demonstrated.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Mechanism of action of antitumor drugs that interact with microtubules and tubulin.

Microtubules, major structural components in cells, are the target of a large and diverse group of natural product anticancer drugs. Given the success of this class of drugs in cancer treatment, it can be argued that microtubules represent the single best cancer target identified to date. Microtubules are highly dynamic assemblies of the protein tubulin. They readily polymerize and depolymerize in cells, and they undergo two interesting kinds of dynamics called dynamic instability and treadmilling. These dynamic behaviors are crucial to mitosis, the process of chromosomal division to form new cells. Microtubule dynamics are highly regulated during the cell cycle by endogenous cellular regulators. In addition, many antitumor drugs and natural compounds alter the polymerization dynamics of microtubules, blocking mitosis, and consequently, inducing cell death by apoptosis. These drugs include several that inhibit microtubule polymerization at high drug concentrations, namely, the Vinca alkaloids, cryptophycins, halichondrins, estramustine, and colchicine. Another group of these compounds stimulates microtubule polymerization and stabilizes microtubules at high concentrations. These include Taxol, Taxotere, eleutherobins, epothilones, laulimalide, sarcodictyins, and discodermolide. Importantly, considerable evidence indicates that, at lower concentrations, these drugs have a common mechanism of action; they suppress the dynamics of microtubules without appreciably changing the mass of microtubules in the cell. The drugs bind to diverse sites on tubulin and at different positions within the microtubule, and they have diverse effects on microtubule dynamics. However, by their common mechanism of suppression microtubule dynamics, they all block mitosis at the metaphase/anaphase transition, and induce cell death.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1985

Direct inhibitory effects of natural and synthetic oestrogens on testosterone release from human testicular tissue in vitro.

Human testicular slices were incubated in vitro in order to examine the direct effects of natural and synthetic oestrogens on testosterone secretion. In the presence of human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 IU per ml), oestradiol-17 beta (1 or 10 micrograms per ml) and ethinyl oestradiol (0.1, 1 or 10 micrograms per ml) inhibited testosterone release into the media in a dose dependent manner. The addition of estramustine phosphate, estromustine, diethylstilboestrol or diethylstilboestrol diphosphate in comparable concentrations produced no significant effects on testosterone release.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

[Clinical evaluation of low dose glucocorticoid therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer].

Fifteen cases with hormone-refractory metastatic carcinoma of the prostate were treated by the combination therapy of LH-RH analogue and low-dose glucocorticoid. Prior treatments of the patients were composed of maximum androgen blockade (MAB) therapy (14 cases) and bilateral orichiectomy (1 case). Nine of 15 cases underwent estramustine based treatment or anti-cancer chemotherapy as the second-line therapy. As a glucocorticoid (steroid) therapy, 1.5 or 2.0 mg of dexamethasone or 10 mg of predonisolone were given for a median period of nine months. Clinical responses were evaluated by the determination of serum PSA, EOD score and QOL scales. PSA responses were classified as CR, PR and PD according to the following categories; CR : PSA level decreased to less than 2 ng/ml, PR : PSA level decreased to less than half values of pretreatment level, PD: 20% or more increased to pretreatment level. PSA responses (CR + PR) were observed in eight of 15 patients for a median period of six months. Responses are seemed to be correlated with the Gleason scores. No apparent improvement on EOD scores by bone scintigraphy was seen, however, definite improvement of bone pain was identified in eight of 11 cases. The steroid therapy was considered as one of the useful treatment choice for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

[Clinical evaluation of hot flushes developing during endocrine therapy for prostate carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: There are few clinical investigations on the hot flushes that develop during endocrine therapy for prostate cancer in Japan, although there are many reports in the Western countries. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of hot flushes and the association between hot flushes and clinical characteristics of prostate cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight prostate cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy (LH-RH analog (group LH-RHA); 22 patients, LH-RHA + non-steroidal antiandrogen (group LH-RHA + NSAA); 20 patients, LH-RHA + steroidal antiandrogen (group LH-RHA + SAA); 8 patients, LH-RHA + estramustine phosphate (group LH-RHA + EP); 1 patient, bilateral orchiectomy (group O); 5 patients, O + non-steroidal antiandrogen (group O + NSAA); 11 patients, and O + steroidal antiandrogen (group O + SAA); 1 patient) were evaluated by a fixed questionnaire. The incidence of the hot flush, the association between hot flushes and the clinical factors, as well as the therapy of hot flushes including SAA and Kampo therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall incidence of hot flushes was 37% (36% in group LH-RHA, 45% in group LH-RHA + NSAA, 13% in group LH-RHA + SAA, 0% in group LH-RHA + EP, 20% in group O, 45% in group O + NSAA, 100% in group O + SAA). No significant association between the hot flushes and the clinical factors of the patients was observed. On the other hand, in 3 of 4 patients treated by SAA, hot flushes improved after 4 weeks. In 2 of 3 patients treated by Kampo, hot flushes improved after 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: Hot flushes are the major side effect of endocrine therapy for Japanese prostate cancer patients. SAA and Kampo are thought to be effective for treatment of hot flushes.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

[Long-term survival of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a case report].

Although prostate cancer initially responds well to endocrine therapy, it becomes resistant to the therapy a few years later, and is called hormone-refractory cancer. In general, hormone-refractory prostate cancer is resistant to all kinds of therapy and the prognosis is extremely poor. Here we report an unusual case of a person with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, who has been surviving for more than 5 years after being diagnosed as having this type of cancer. A 75-year-old man was diagnosed with prostate cancer (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, T3 N0 M1, stage D2) and initial endocrine therapy combined with castration and estrogen was effective. Four years later, the tumor marker of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increased and the cancer was thought to be hormone-independent, refractory state. Alteration of antiandrogen from chlormadinone acetate to flutamide was effective and PSA was kept at low levels for 6 months. When PSA rose again, we started oral chemotherapy with tegafur.uracil. PSA decreased to normal range (complete response) and remained stable for 10 months. After that, a rapid increase of PSA was controlled for 7 months by oral chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate sodium and VP-16. This case indicates that alteration of antiandrogens or oral chemotherapy may be useful in some cases with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗