Cash squeeze ahead. AMA needs to go the way of 'Good Housekeeping' or lose its relevance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
$367,526 saved in 6 months with home health monitor. UIC Medical Center in Chicago is saving big dollars with a physician-invented home health monitor that has slashed readmissions among costly congestive heart failure patients. Now with FDA approval, the device can help other health care providers to offer an ounce of prevention--instead of a costly pound of cure.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing its intention to propose amendments to the performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components. The agency is taking this action to address changes in the technology and use of radiographic and fluoroscopic systems. The agency is issuing this advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in accordance with its policy of early public disclosure of rulemaking activities. The FDA is soliciting comments and information from interested persons concerning the subject matter of the proposed amendments.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of class I devices, subject to certain limitations, that will be exempt from premarket notification requirements on February 19, 1998. FDA is also publishing a list of those class I devices that FDA believes will remain subject to premarket notification requirements because they meet the new statutory criteria for premarket notification requirements. These lists do not include class I devices that have been previously exempted by regulation from the premarket notification requirements. FDA is taking this action in order to meet a requirement of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (the FDAMA). The agency requests comments on whether the list of class I devices that will remain subject to the premarket notification requirements should be modified.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that the agency has issued new orders to manufacturers of devices that were subject to tracking. These new orders became effective on February 19, 1998, and require manufacturers to continue tracking the devices under the revised tracking provisions of the recently enacted Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). FDAMA allows the agency discretion in issuing orders to manufacturers to track devices that meet certain criteria. FDA is soliciting comments on what factors should be considered in exercising its discretion in determining whether the agency should not track a particular device, even though it meets the statutory criteria. FDA specifically is requesting comments on whether there are factors that FDA should consider in exercising its discretion in releasing certain devices listed in this notice from tracking requirements. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance that addresses device tracking under FDAMA, including the application of certain requirements under the current tracking regulations.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a guidance entitled "Guidance on Medical Device Tracking." This guidance is intended to provide guidelines to manufacturers and distributors about their responsibilities for medical device tracking under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA). This guidance addresses what statutory and regulatory tracking requirements have changed and what requirements remain the same under the FDAMA amendments. The agency requests comments on this guidance. Elsewhere, in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing new orders to manufacturers of devices that were subject to tracking.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to classify the Apgar timer, lice removal kit, and infusion stand into class I. FDA is also publishing the recommendations of the General Hospital and Personal Use Devices Panel (the panel) regarding the classification of the devices. After considering public comments on the proposed classification, FDA will publish a final regulation classifying the devices. This action is being taken under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), as amended by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the amendments), the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (the SMDA), and the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA).
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is extending to June 29, 1998, the comment period for the advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) that appeared in the Federal Register of December 23, 1997 (62 FR 67011). This advance notice announced FDA's intention to review and, as needed, to revise compliance policy guides, amend regulatory requirements and, as appropriate, exercise alternative regulatory approaches regarding the remarketing of used medical devices. The agency is taking this action in response to two requests for extensions. This extension of comment period is intended to allow interested persons additional time to submit comments on the ANPRM.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend its regulations pursuant to an international agreement that is expected to be concluded between the United States and the European Community (EC) (Ref. 1). Under the terms of that agreement, FDA may normally endorse good manufacturing practice (GMP) inspection reports for pharmaceuticals provided by equivalent EC Member State regulatory authorities and medical device quality system evaluation reports and certain medical device premarket evaluation reports provided by equivalent conformity assessment bodies. FDA is taking this action to enhance its ability to ensure the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals and medical devices through more efficient and effective utilization of its regulatory resources. The agency is requesting comments on the proposed rule.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the regulations governing humanitarian use devices. These amendments are being made to implement provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is publishing a companion proposed rule, under FDA's usual procedures for notice and comment, to provide a procedural framework to finalize the rule in the event the agency receives any significant adverse comment and withdraws the direct final rule.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend certain regulations governing humanitarian use devices. This proposed rule is a companion document to the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. The amendments are being made to implement provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). This companion proposed rule is being issued under FDAMA and the act as amended.
Federal law requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the promotional claims of prescription drugs and certain devices. Standards of evidence for claims of safety and therapeutic efficacy are rigorous because inappropriate product use may place human life at risk. However, equally demanding criteria for claims of cost-effectiveness of marketed technologies seem to be unnecessary because the consequence of error is principally a bad buy rather than patient harm. Concern exists about the validity of cost-effectiveness studies, the potential for bias, standards for the conduct of cost-effectiveness research, and the needs of managed care. The FDA should moderate its role in regulating cost-effectiveness claims of drugs and devices. This would foster information flow to healthcare providers and insurers and protect the FDA concern regarding false or misleading claims of effectiveness. Although the issues are applicable to both devices and drugs, we draw mainly from the field of pharmacoeconomics because this is where most of the policy has developed.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the biologics regulations by adding "cellular therapy products" to the list of products excepted from the general safety test (GST) and by adding an administrative procedure for obtaining exemptions from the GST requirements for other biological products. FDA is taking this action because the GST may not be relevant or necessary for biological products, including cellular therapy products, currently in various stages of development. This direct final rule is part of FDA's continuing effort to achieve the objectives of the President's "Reinventing Government" initiative, and is intended to reduce the burden of unnecessary regulations on biological products without diminishing the protection of the public health. Elsewhere in this Federal Register, FDA is publishing a companion proposed rule under FDA's usual procedures for notice and comment to provide a procedural framework to finalize the rule in the event the agency receives any significant adverse comment and withdraws this direct final rule.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend the biologics regulations by adding cellular therapy products to the list of products exempted from the general safety test (GST) and by adding an administrative procedure for obtaining exemptions from the GST requirements. This proposed rule is a companion document to the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. FDA is taking this action because the GST may not be relevant or necessary for many types of biological products, including cellular therapy products, currently in various stages of development.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing its intention to review and, as necessary, to revise or to amend its compliance policy guides and regulatory requirements relating to the remarketing of used medical devices and the persons who refurbish, recondition, rebuild, service, or remarket such devices. The agency is considering these actions because it believes evolving industry practices warrant reevaluation of current policy and the application of certain regulatory requirements in order to ensure that particular remarketed devices meet suitable performance requirements for their intended uses, and are as safe as the originally marketed finished device. FDA is soliciting comments, proposals for alternative regulatory approaches, and information on these issues. In a future issue of the Federal Register, FDA will announce an open meeting of the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Advisory Committee concerning these matters.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice that it does not intend to apply to combination products currently regulated under human drug or biologic labeling provisions its September 30, 1997, final rule requiring certain labeling statements for all medical devices that contain or have packaging that contains natural rubber that contacts humans. FDA is taking this action, in part, in response to a citizen petition and other communications from industry that the agency has received since the publication of the final rule. FDA intends to initiate a proceeding to propose natural rubber labeling requirements for drugs and biologics, including combination products that are currently regulated under drug and biologic labeling provisions. Such a proceeding may include a combination of rulemaking and guidance and will offer opportunity for public comment.