Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DERMATITIS, CONTACT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 757 records · Page 42Linked to original sources

Is a worker's understanding of their diagnosis an important determinant of outcome in occupational contact dermatitis?

The possible effect of an individual's knowledge of their diagnosis on their disease outcome was examined in a group of 230 workers with occupational contact dermatitis. The workers were surveyed with an interviewer-administered questionnaire for an average of 5 years following a diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis. 48% had allergic contact dermatitis and 52% had irritant contact dermatitis. There was a poor correlation between the workers' recalled diagnosis and the actual diagnosis, but better concordance with their recollection of patch test results. Only 33% correctly identified their diagnosis. Those who could not were approximately 2 x as likely to still have active dermatitis, to have more severe dermatitis and to note that their skin problem interfered with their work and home activities. Those who had no idea of their diagnosis were 3 x as likely to have these problems. These results raise the possibility that further efforts directed at the patient's education with respect to their condition might improve the outcome of their occupational skin disease.

Adult↗

Nickel-elicited systemic contact dermatitis from a peripheral intravenous catheter.

Nickel-elicited systemic contact dermatitis is a well-known entity, although it is far less common than allergic contact dermatitis. In most of the cases, the main way of nickel administration is oral. Clinical manifestations are miscellaneous including pompholyx, diffuse exanthema, flexural dermatitis or baboon syndrome. Systemic nickel dermatitis induced by venous catheters is very uncommon, but it is probably underdiagnosed. We report here 2 patients with diffuse recurrent maculopapular rash corresponding to nickel-elicited systemic contact dermatitis. They were both perfused during the last episode with the assistance of a peripheral polyurethane venous catheter during or just before the cutaneous eruption. At the base of the catheter, there was a small metallic eyelet on which dimethylglyoxime test was positive, indicating a release of nickel. Then, we measured nickel release in normal use conditions and found high nickel levels, although the manufacturer denied that nickel could be released. This diagnosis is important to know because such exanthema often occurred during postoperative or postpartum period. Its frequency is probably underestimated because it is often considered as a cutaneous drug reaction. To our knowledge, only 2 cases have been reported in the literature.

Adult↗

Patients with allergic and irritant contact dermatitis are characterized by striking change of iron and oxidized glutathione status in nonlesional area of the skin.

To assess the consequences of oxidative stress in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, we compared the iron level, unsaturated iron-binding capacity, total iron binding capacity, the percentage saturation of iron-binding capacity, the amount of diene conjugates as well as the amounts of total glutathione, reduced glutathione, oxidized glutathione, and the oxidized glutathione/reduced glutathione ratio in skin homogenate from lesional and nonlesional skin. Lesional skin samples were obtained from positive patch test sites to 5% NiSO4 in five subjects, and from chronic contact dermatitis lesions on the hands, which had exacerbated over 3--9 wk in six subjects. Contact dermatitis caused at least a 4-fold increase in the iron level in the lesional skin area compared with the nonlesional skin area (p < 0.02). The increase in the iron level depended on the duration of contact dermatitis and was accompanied by high unsaturated iron-binding capacity and total iron-binding capacity values in the positive patch test sites (p < 0.05), and by a high percentage saturation value in the chronic contact dermatitis lesions (p < 0.05). We found high indices for iron, total iron-binding capacity and diene conjugates in the apparently healthy skin of the patients with persistent contact dermatitis that significantly (p < 0.05) exceeded the corresponding values in the patients with only patch test reactions. In summary, we have succeeded in providing evidence that generalized oxidative damage of the skin occurs as a consequence of contact dermatitis in a restricted area.

Adult↗

Changes in epidermal proliferation and differentiation in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis reactions.

Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis are similar clinically, histologically and on immunohistochemistry. In the present investigation, we assessed whether study of the recruitment of cycling epidermal cells, and the expression of keratin 16 and involucrin, are of use in differentiating between the response to contact allergens and the response to the irritant detergent sodium lauryl sulphate. Both allergic and irritant challenges induced epidermal proliferation, and the expression of keratin 16 and involucrin, but the dynamics were different. Two and 3 days after challenge, a highly significant difference between the allergic and irritant reactions was observed with respect to involucrin expression assessed by MON-150 staining.

Adult↗

Preferential usage of TCR-Vbeta17 by peripheral and cutaneous T cells in nickel-induced contact dermatitis.

Nickel (Ni) is one of the most common contact sensitizers in man, and Ni-induced contact dermatitis is considered as a model of hapten-induced delayed type hypersensitivity. Previous studies indicated that Ni-reactive T cells derived from Ni-allergic individuals preferentially express distinct TCR-Vbeta chains. However, data on the TCR-Vbeta repertoire of Ni-responsive T cells are not consistent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the TCR-Vbeta receptors of Ni-responsive peripheral and cutaneous T cells in a cohort of 17 donors with Ni-induced contact dermatitis in comparison with those of 6 healthy controls. Peripheral NiSO(4)-responsive T lymphocytes showed a significant overexpression of TCR-Vbeta17 and the frequency of TCR-Vbeta17(+) T cells correlated significantly with the in vitro reactivity of PBMC to NiSO(4). In addition, the cutaneous infiltrate of Ni-induced patch test reactions consisted primarily of Vbeta17(+) T cells. The majority of patch test-derived NiSO(4)-responsive T cells of three allergic donors were TCR-Vbeta17(+), whereas patch test-derived NiSO(4) unresponsive T cells of four additional donors did not express TCR-Vbeta17. Skin-derived Ni-responsive T cell lines from three donors uniformly secreted the Th2 cytokine, IL-5, but no IFN-gamma or IL-10. These in vitro and in vivo findings strongly suggest that T cells with a restricted TCR-Vbeta repertoire, i.e., Vbeta17, predominate in NiSO(4)-induced contact dermatitis and may be crucial in the effector phase of Ni hypersensitivity.

Cells, Cultured↗

Sensitization and elicitation of inflammation in contact dermatitis.

The problem of contact allergic dermatitis in humans and contact hypersensitivity in animals begins with the observation that certain reactive compounds when placed on skin lead to the development of a reproducible and characteristic inflammatory reaction. The immunologic processes which conspire to produce this damaging tissue reaction are derived from the normal immunologic balance between a protection of self and a destruction of nonself. Experimental work in the last decade has focused on the role of antigen-presenting cells, and specifically Langerhans cells, in the initiation of contact hypersensitivity as well as on the competing roles of subsets of T lymphocytes in its regulation. For humans, an important goal has been the development of techniques by which tolerization and desensitization may be achieved, and for those who work with laboratory animals CH has provided methods to examine immune regulation in general. In the coming decade, we anticipate that new techniques from molecular biology, molecular genetics, tissue culture, and, above all, shrewd clinical observation will provide a new array of ideas and possibilities.

Animals↗

What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition.

Occupational contact dermatitis remains an important cause of disability. Eight steps in an operational definition of OCD are as follows: 1. Relevant clinical history 2. Relevant morphology 3. Positive diagnostic patch test with appropriate vehicle and concentration 4. Repeat patch test when excited skin syndrome is suspected 5. Positive provocative use test or repeat open application test to refine clinical relevance 6. Serial dilutions, when necessary, of the chemical tested 7. Reviewing controls for nonirritating concentrations when this is not known by the investigator 8. Generally, clearing of the dermatitis when allergen is removed, or exposure significantly decreased The diagnosis is not always easy. Well-conducted clinical investigations are needed, including clinical history, clinical examination, and patch testing with careful follow-up. However, many of the chemicals reported in the literature as sensitizers induce only sporadic allergic reactions. Thus, epidemiologic animal and human studies are necessary to determine the capacity of the chemicals used in industry to induce contact dermatoses. It is necessary to standardize the predictive tests to compare results among laboratories and to predict the potential for sensitization.

Animals↗

The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals.

The elicitation response in allergic contact dermatitis is dose dependent, but the time-concentration relationship for elicitation has not previously been described. In this study 27 isoeugenol-sensitive patients participated in serial dilution patch tests with isoeugenol and a double-blinded Repeated Open Application Test (ROAT) using two concentrations of isoeugenol, 0.2 and 0.05%. Seven controls without isoeugenol allergy were also included. The participants applied 3.72 +/- 1.57 (mean +/- SD) mg/cm(2) of coded isoeugenol solutions twice a day to a 3 x 3 cm(2) area on the volar aspect of the right and left arm, respectively. For each test site the applications continued until a reaction appeared or for a maximum of 28 days. The minimal criteria for a positive reaction regarded as allergic contact dermatitis was persistent erythema at the ROAT test site. All controls were negative and 16/24 (66.7%) of the included isoeugenol-sensitive subjects showed a positive ROAT to the 0.2% solution within the study period (Fisher's test, p = 0.0024). Ten of the positive patients also reacted to the 0.05% solution. The median number of days until a positive reaction to the 0.2% solution was 7 days and was 15 days for the 0.05% solution. There was a highly significant correlation between the patients' patch test threshold and the number of days until a positive ROAT. In conclusion, the time until an isoeugenol allergic individual reacts in a ROAT depends on the individual sensitivity as well as the exposure concentrations; for low concentrations of the allergen or low degree of sensitivity, the allergic contact dermatitis may develop after several weeks of exposure. Therefore, a negative ROAT after 7 days may be a false negative.

Administration, Topical↗

Contact dermatitis from cetostearyl alcohol.

Emulsifiers are an uncommon cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Five cases of allergic contact dermatitis to cetostearyl alcohol are presented. In all five cases, multiple positive reactions to other allergens were present, usually topical corticosteroid creams.

Adult↗

Contact dermatitis to metals.

Metals are in close contact with skin and mucous membranes on a repeated, if not constant, basis. Nickel and mercury, well-recognized causes of contact dermatitis; gold and palladium, recently gaining acceptance as patch test allergens on standard screening trays; and cobalt are reviewed in this article. Sensitization to nickel, the most frequently identified allergen on patch testing, is associated with ear piercing. Contact with this potential allergen is ubiquitous. Mercury may be encountered as organic mercury in thimerosal, used as an antiseptic and a preservative in topical medications and vaccines, and metallic mercury found in dental amalgam and thermometers. Both forms may cause contact dermatitis. Gold, recognized as a frequent sensitizer, has been implicated in some cases of eyelid, patchy diffuse and oral lichenoid dermatitis. Cobalt allergy, found frequently in patients who are nickel allergic, also has been associated with ear piercing. Palladium sensitivity is often associated with nickel allergy. However, the incidence of clinical relevance is yet to be established.

Cobalt↗

Systemic contact dermatitis from herbal and homeopathic preparations used for herpes virus treatment.

Systemic contact dermatitis may occur in contact-sensitized individuals when they are exposed to haptens orally, transcutaneously, intravenously or by inhalation. We report the case of a woman developing a diffuse skin eruption after the topical use of Rhus toxicodendron alcoholic extract and the oral introduction of a homeopathic preparation of the same substance for herpes treatment. An open test, performed with the Rhus toxicodendron tincture, showed an erythemato-oedematous response at 48 h and vesicular reaction at 96 h that was still present after 7 days. Patch test with 65% ethyl alcohol gave negative results. The open test performed, as control, in eight healthy informed subjects revealed negative responses to Rhus tincture application. The result is interesting because in Italy, allergic contact dermatitis to Rhus is uncommon and this case increases the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanism leading to systemic contact dermatitis development.

Administration, Oral↗

Regional variation in prevalence and etiology of allergic contact dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: The 1994-1996 North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch test results were the first, since the inception of the NACDG in 1970, to include results from a medium-sized metropolitan city in the Midwest. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the causative allergens of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in the Midwest differ from those in other regions of the United States and, if so, whether occupational or other factors account for the observed differences. METHODS: Retrospective analyses of patch test data collected at the University of Kansas Medical Center (Kansas City, KS) were compared with the data collected by the other NACDG centers. RESULTS: Patients in Kansas City were statistically more likely to react to potassium dichromate, formaldehyde and its releasers, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI), and glutaraldehyde. Occupational exposures to chromium and formaldehyde were increased significantly among patients from Kansas City, although the percentages of the local population engaged in these occupations did not differ from those in other NACDG cities. Equal percentages of workers in Kansas City and nationally had occupationally related allergy to glutaraldehyde, although the overall rate of glutaraldehyde was higher among patients from Kansas City. Most cases of relevant allergy to MCI/MI were cosmetically induced both in Kansas City and nationally. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings show significant regional differences in causal allergens. The increased percentages of patients seen with ACD to formaldehyde, formaldehyde-releasing agents, and potassium dichromate in Kansas City were likely caused by the referral of greater numbers of work-related cases. However, occupationally acquired ACD to MCI/MI and glutaraldehyde were not more frequent in Kansas City than nationally, suggesting that other factors might be operative. Although awareness of national trends is important, dermatologists must be cognizant of regional variations in allergen sources within their communities and referral networks.

Adolescent↗

Cytokine gene polymorphisms in allergic contact dermatitis.

Susceptibility to contact allergy may be influenced by genetically determined alterations in the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. This report focuses on functional polymorphisms in the genes encoding for several cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of contact allergic responses, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (G-238 A, G-308 A), interleukin (IL)-1beta (C-511G, T+ 3953C), its natural antagonist, the IL-1 receptor antagonist (VNTR intron 2), and IL-6 (G-174C). Polymorphisms were investigated by PCR techniques among polysensitized individuals, defined as individuals with confirmed contact sensitization to para-substituted aryl compounds and at least one other structurally unrelated allergen (n = 86), and healthy control individuals without a history of eczema (n = 310). The distribution of TNFA-308 genotypes was significantly different in these groups (Padjusted= 0.0378). Compared with carriers of 2 wild-type alleles (TNFA-308*1/1 (*G/G)), carriers of the TNFA-308*1/2 (*G/A) and TNFA-308*2/2 (*A/A) genotypes tended to be more common among polysensitized individuals [OR = 1.54, 95% CI (0.92-2.55) and OR = 2.36 (0.84-6.51), respectively]. No significantly different distribution of genotypes was detected at any other polymorphic loci among control individuals without eczema and polysensitized subjects. These findings suggest a possible relationship between the TNFA-308 polymorphism and contact allergy. The results need to be confirmed in future studies.

Adult↗

Vitamin E ointment at high dose levels suppresses contact dermatitis in rats by stabilizing keratinocytes.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacological effect of vitamin E ointment at high dose levels was investigated in rats and mice during the development of contact dermatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Allergic or irritant contact dermatitis was induced in sensitized or unsensitized animals by topical application of chemical agent(s). Cultured keratinocytes were prepared from dorsal skin of rats. RESULTS: The vitamin E ointment at 20-40% suppressed allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, exerting a comparable effect to that of 0.5% prednisolone ointment. Microscopic findings revealed that 20% vitamin E ointment reduced the keratinocyte damage, whereas 0.5% prednisolone was ineffective. The protective action of vitamin E on keratinocyte damage was also confirmed in a cell culture experiment. Furthermore, 20% vitamin E ointment blocked down-regulation of skin barrier function induced by contact dermatitis, although 0.5% prednisolone ointment was inactive. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that 20% vitamin E ointment suppresses contact dermatitis by stabilizing keratinocytes, concomitantly with novel, interesting properties.

Administration, Topical↗

Allergic contact dermatitis in children.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is equally as likely in infancy as in adulthood, and represents 20% of all cases of dermatitis in children. Its true prevalence and incidence are, however, unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective study over 10 years of a group of patients aged 15 years or less, with clinical suspicion of ACD. Patch tests were performed in accordance with the standards of the GEIDC. RESULTS: The study covered 96 patients with a mean age of 10.57+/-0.67 years. The zones most frequently affected by eczemas were those of diffuse distribution (28% of patients) and of the hands (27%). We found at least one positive response in 52% of the cases. The most frequent allergens were thiomersal (21%), mercury (19%) and nickel (18%). We have found a statistically significant association between age of less than 15 years and positive response to thiomersal [P<0.01; OR: 8.5 with confidence interval (CI) 95%: 5.08<odds ratio (OR)<14.20] and mercury (P<0.01; OR: 4.38 with CI 95%: 3.02<OR<6.33). CONCLUSIONS: With increasing age, nickel takes the place of the mercurials as the principal allergen.

Adolescent↗

The effect of two moisturisers on skin barrier damage in allergic contact dermatitis.

Nickel (Ni)-induced allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was performed in human volunteers to study the role of moisturisers in preventing ACD-related skin barrier damage. 15 Ni-sensitive females (mean age: 29.5 years; range: 23-38) were included. On days 1, 21, 24 and 26, TEWL, stratum corneum (SC)-capacitance and clinical score were evaluated on four test sites on the right and left forearms. Both a highly and a poorly hydrating moisturising formulation were applied on two sites from days 1 to 21, after which Ni-ACD was induced on the 2 pre-treated sites and one non-treated area. On day 24, TEWL values were significantly increased on the site pre-treated with poorly hydrating product compared to the rich formulation pre-treated site. SC-hydration was significantly improved on the latter site on days 21, 23 and 26. Long-term use of inadequate moisturiser increases skin barrier damage due to Ni-ACD.

Adult↗

[Systemic contact dermatitis].

The field of systemic contact dermatitis is particularly interesting for an allergist. To think of an allergen with cross-reaction and monosensilization should be the first reflex when an enquiry into a skin problem involves an allergic symptom. The three examples quoted involve Peruvian balm as the sensitizing agent. The causal triggering medicines are all vegetal extracts.

Aged↗

Allergic contact dermatitis from oxygen cannulas.

A patient experienced allergic contact dermatitis on two occasions two months apart as a result of wearing the same brand of polyvinyl chloride oxygen cannula. In one instance the cannula was removed and not replaced, as continuing oxygen was unnecessary; on the other occasion the original cannula was replaced by a cannula of another brand. In both cases the dermatitis disappeared after removal of the original cannula. The reaction was probably to a resin remaining in the polyvinyl chloride after the curing process in the manufacture of the plastic from which the cannula was made. Allergic reactions to plastics have been documented in other medical products but have not previously been reported in respiratory therapy plastic appliances. Because of variability in residual resins in different brands and batches of plastics, and because of varying individual sensitivity, therapists and others should be alert to the possibility of allergic contact dermatitis from respiratory therapy devices.

Delaware↗