Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ASTHENIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 757 records · Page 42Linked to original sources

The novel and effective nonplatinum, nontaxane combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: potential for decreased toxicity and combination with biological therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are two of the most active third-generation agents for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The authors conducted a formal Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both untreated and previously treated patients with Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 78 patients were treated on the current Phase II trial of front-line or second/third-line therapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in NSCLC. Eligible patients manifested either untreated disease (n = 42) or had received at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (n = 36). The median age was 57.5 years (range, 33-79) with 57 men (73%) and 21 women (27%). The median performance status was one (range, one to two). The initial eight patients (four untreated and four previously treated) were treated at a previously established maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15, with significant myelosuppression seen in five out of eight patients requiring dose omission in the first cycle. The next 70 patients received a reduced dose of vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15. RESULTS: Seventy eight patients were treated. Fifteen (36%) of the 42 evaluable patients who received front-line therapy had objective responses and 14 (33%) had stable disease. In the patients with prior treatment, 6 (17%) of 36 patients had partial response and 18 patients (50%) had stable disease. Median survival time for the previously untreated patient group was 10.1 months, with a one year survival of 43% and a two year survival rate of 32%. For the previously treated patients, the median survival time was 8.5 months, with a one year survival rate of 30%. Toxic effects were notable for significant myelosuppression, with > or =Grade 3 granulocytopenia seen in 55% of the patients on the untreated arm and 67% of the patients on the previously treated arm. Additionally, 9.5% and 13.9% (untreated and previously treated), respectively, of these patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia at some point in their treatment. A full dose delivery analysis showed that this myelosuppression resulted in Course 1, Day 15 skipped doses (even at the reduced dose level) in 42% of previously untreated patients and 47% of pretreated patients. Other side effects seen at Grades 3 and 4 in previously untreated and treated patients included anemia (9.5% and 2.8%), asthenia (4.8% and 5.5%), infection (14.3% and 5.6%), pain (9.5% and 19.4%), and pulmonary complications (4.8% and 13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine/vinorelbine is an active, well-tolerated combination in both front-line and second/third-line therapy for Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The response rate, median survival rate, and one year survival rate compare favorably with platinum-based regimens. The toxicity profile of the gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination was quite favorable, with minimal Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects aside from granulocytopenia, which resulted in numerous Day 15 skipped doses but no significant febrile neutropenia or infection. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine could be a useful regimen in standard clinical practice and has the potential for efficient combination with biologic/targeted therapy. Multiple randomized trials of this combination versus platinum combinations are now ongoing [corrected].

Adult↗

Phase II trial of irinotecan, paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This Phase II multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a three-drug combination of irinotecan (CPT-11), paclitaxel, and carboplatin in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received repeated 21-day cycles at starting doses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 hours, followed by carboplatin AUC of 5 over 30 minutes and CPT-11 at a starting dose level of 100 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, all given on the first day of each cycle. Patients were evaluated for objective tumor response, time to tumor progression (TTP), survival, and safety. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Baseline patient characteristics included: median age 58 years (range, 32-79); 23 males and 17 females; performance status of 0 (21 patients), 1 (18 patients), or 2 (1 patient); and Stage IIIB (10 patients) and Stage IV (30 patients) disease. A median of six cycles (range, one to eight) were administered. Grade 3-4 toxicities observed in >/= 10% of the patients included neutropenia (78%), asthenia (20%), diarrhea (20%), nausea (18%), vomiting (13%), anemia (10%), and dyspnea (10%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in eight patients (20%), with one death due to neutropenic sepsis. Twelve of 38 evaluable patients had confirmed tumor responses (32%), while 21 (55%) had stable disease (including 12 patients [32%] with minor responses). Only 13% had disease progression at their initial tumor assessment. The median TTP and survival were 5.3 months (range, 0.03-6.2 months) and 12.5 months (range 0.3-28.6+ months), respectively. The one and two year survival probabilities were 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.73) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.0-0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CPT-11, paclitaxel, and carboplatin can be safely administered and is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Based on the favorable survival outcome, this regimen is undergoing evaluation in prospective randomized trials.

Adult↗

Gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: an alternative therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based combinations are considered to be the standard treatment for advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. Many of the patients are elderly with concomitant diseases or impaired renal function. We studied the tolerance and activity of the gemcitabine/carboplatin combination as a therapeutic alternative. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC of the urothelium were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 on Day 1 every 21 days. Patients with creatinine clearance of 30 mL/min or above and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores 60 or above were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 227 cycles were administered to 41 patients, with an average of 5.5 cycles per patient (range, 1-8 cycles). Creatinine clearance was below 60 mL/min in 54% of patients, KPS was 70 or below in 37% of patients, and 37% of patients were 70 years old or older. Hematologic toxicity was mainly Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 63%, Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 32%, and Grade 3/4 anemia in 54% of patients. There were only three episodes of febrile neutropenia and one death from neutropenic sepsis. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild, with asthenia as the most frequently reported event. We obtained 6 complete and 17 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 56.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.6-71.6%). Progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.7-8.5) and median survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.8-12.2). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin achieves a similar result to doublets using cisplatin. It has an acceptable toxicity profile and enables patients with impaired renal function and/or poor performance status and elderly patients to be treated.

Aged↗

Biweekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel, cisplatin (P), tegafur (T), and leucovorin (L) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for patients with advanced, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: From November 1999 to January 2001, 21 consecutive patients (Stage IV, 100%; T4, 86%; and N3, 41%) were treated with paclitaxel-PTL (Day 1: paclitaxel, 120 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion for 3 hours; Day 1: P, 50 mg/m(2); T, 800 mg; and L, 60 mg orally daily over a 14-day cycle). Evaluation after three cycles led to CT termination if primary tumor responses were less than partial responses. Otherwise, paclitaxel-PTL was continued for up to six cycles before commencement of locoregional therapy. RESULTS: CT responses were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Response rates (RR) for the primary tumors were 81% (17 of 21), with 28.6% (6 of 21) showing a complete response (CR). RR and CR rates for the neck lymph nodes were 85.3% (15 of 18) and 22% (4 of 18), respectively. The combined RR for primary tumors and neck lymph nodes was 81% (95% confidence interval, 62.9-99.3%) with a CR rate of 19%. Grade 3/4 toxicities according to World Health Organization criteria included leukopenia, 19.0%; emesis, 9.5%; asthenia, 9.5%; mucositis, 4.8%; and neuropathy, 4.8%. Both the overall and disease-free survival rates were 14.3% (3 of 21), with a median follow-up of 41 months. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low toxicities and encouraging response rates demonstrated in the current study suggested that paclitaxel-PTL merits future trials in the setting of resectable tumors with more favorable characteristics.

Adult↗

Phase I clinical trial of fixed-dose rate infusional gemcitabine and dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with assessment of gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation.

BACKGROUND: In the current study, the authors set out to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) associated with a combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS), to obtain preliminary information on the activity of this combination, and to explore possible pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine and DTIC. METHODS: Every 2 weeks, 22 patients with refractory ASTS received fixed-dose rate gemcitabine (10 mg/m2/min) at escalating doses, which ranged from 800 mg/m2 to 2160 mg/m2, plus 500 mg/m2 DTIC. Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, along with gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), were evaluated during the course of treatment. RESULTS: Grade 3 elevation of transaminase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels represented the DLT associated with the administration of 2160 mg/m2 gemcitabine plus 500 mg/m2 DTIC. This side effect was reversible, rather than cumulative, and did not exceed Grade 3 in its severity. The doses recommended for use in subsequent Phase II studies are 1800 mg/m2 gemcitabine (administered over the course of 3 hours) and 500 mg/m2 DTIC. Hematologic toxicity was moderate, and nonhematologic side effects that did not exceed Grade 2 in severity included the following: asthenia (75% of patients), fever (59%), nausea (52%), stomatitis (48%), anorexia (44%), emesis (40%), flulike syndrome (37%), and erythematous rash (26%). Alopecia was common. Intracellular dFdCTP levels, which were evaluated in 6 patients, reached a mean maximum value of 209 pmol per 10(6) cells (standard deviation, 59 pmol per 10(6) cells) at the conclusion of gemcitabine administration. DTIC had a limited effect on the elimination of dFdCTP from PBMCs. Objective responses were observed in 5 of the 19 patients who were evaluable for treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and DTIC possesses an acceptable toxicity profile and may warrant further investigation in patients with ASTS.

Adult↗

Cytokines in pancreatic carcinoma: correlation with phenotypic characteristics and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Cytokines have been implicated in diverse processes that are relevant to pancreatic carcinoma, including cachexia, asthenia, and tumor growth. The objective of this study was to examine the association between serum levels of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory or angiogenic cytokines and the outcomes of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: Serum cytokine levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay from 51 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and from 48-62 healthy volunteers. Cytokine levels were compared with disease manifestations and overall survival. RESULTS: Circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha), and IL-1beta were not elevated significantly in patients with pancreatic carcinoma, but levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) were elevated significantly (P <0.05). Cytokine levels were dichotomized based on an analysis of null Martingale residuals. Patients who had IL-6 levels > 5.2 pg/mL or IL-10 levels >9.8 pg/mL had significantly worse survival compared with patients who had lower IL-6 or IL-10 levels (P <0.05). IL-8 levels were not associated with survival differences. Patients who had IL-1RA levels <159 pg/mL had significantly worse survival compared with patients who had higher IL-1RA levels (P <0.05). Higher IL-6, IL-10, and IL-8 levels were associated with poor performance status and/or weight loss. In multivariate analysis, only T4 tumors and high IL-6 levels were selected as independent prognostic factors for poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating levels of several cytokines were high in patients with pancreatic carcinoma, and their association with weight loss and poor performance status suggested that they may be involved in these disease manifestations. Furthermore, serum cytokine levels, in particular IL-6, may be a useful prognostic marker.

Adult↗

A multicenter Phase II study of bortezomib in recurrent or metastatic sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Based on evidence of activity in preclinical and Phase I studies, the authors undertook a study of bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor, for patients with metastatic sarcomas. METHODS: Two arms were opened, each using a Simon two-stage design. Arm A included patients with osteogenic sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Arm B accrued patients with other types of soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were not allowed to have received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The initial dose of bortezomib was a 1.5 mg/m2 intravenous push twice weekly followed by a rest week. The dose was escalated to 1.7 mg/m2 if patients tolerated Cycle 1 well. The dose escalation was eliminated due to toxicity observed in the first six patients. RESULTS: Painful neuropathy, myalgias, and asthenia were the most significant observed toxicities. The most frequent toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, and nausea. Pharmacodynamic data from 18 patients with complete data collection did not show consistent differences between patients with or without Grade 2 or Grade 3 neuropathy (toxicity graded according the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Arm A had low accrual and was closed. One confirmed partial response among 21 evaluable patients was observed on Arm B in a patient with leiomyosarcoma. Due to the inactivity of this agent, the study was closed after the first stage of accrual. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib has minimal activity in soft tissue sarcoma as a single agent. If studied further in sarcomas, bortezomib should be investigated in combination with agents with demonstrated preclinical synergy.

Adult↗

Phase I/II trial of adding semisynthetic homoharringtonine in chronic myeloid leukemia patients who have achieved partial or complete cytogenetic response on imatinib.

BACKGROUND: A Phase I/II study was designed to show whether the addition of semisynthetic homoharringtonine (sHHT) would reduce the level of residual disease in patients with Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia who appeared to have achieved a suboptimal response to imatinib alone. METHODS: Patients with CML who had achieved >/= 35% Ph-negativity on imatinib were included. All patients had been treated with imatinib at >/= 400 mg/day for at least 2 years and had achieved a plateau in BCR-ABL transcripts defined by measuring BCR-ABL transcripts on at least 4 occasions over a minimum period of 1 year with the latest value not lower than the previous minimum value. Initially sHHT was given subcutaneously at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2) twice daily for 1 day. Courses were repeated every 28 days. The dosage of sHHT was escalated by adding one day of treatment every two days. Efficacy was assessed by serial monitoring of blood levels of BCR-ABL transcripts. RESULTS: Of 10 evaluable patients, 7 had an appreciable decline in BCR-ABL transcript levels; in 5 cases the reduction was greater than 1 log. Asthenia (n = 10) and cytopenias (n = 3) were prominent side-effects, but the drug was generally well tolerated. Mutations in the P-loop of the BCR-ABL kinase domain were found in 2 of the patients who responded to the addition of sHHT. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of sHHT should be considered for patients on imatinib who fail to obtain low levels of minimal residual disease.

Adult↗

CCI-779 in metastatic melanoma: a phase II trial of the California Cancer Consortium.

BACKGROUND: CCI-779 is an analog of the immunosuppressive agent, rapamycin, that has demonstrated activity against melanoma in preclinical models and shown clinical benefit in patients with breast and renal carcinoma. CCI-779 is not immunosuppressive when administered on an intermittent schedule, and its toxicity is modest, consisting of nausea, diarrhea, hypertriglyceridemia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, and follicular dermatitis. METHODS: The current trial was designed to detect a median time to disease progression of >18 weeks in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with a 250-mg weekly dose of CCI-779 administered intravenously after diphenhydramine premedication. Patients with measurable disease, no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease, and normal organ function were eligible, and patients with central nervous system involvement, P450-inducing or P450-suppressing drugs, or hypertriglyceridemia were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (21 males) were treated, 21 of whom had been treated previously with chemotherapy and/or biologic agents for advanced-stage disease. One patient had a partial response lasting 2 months. The median time to disease progression and overall survival were 10 weeks and 5 months, respectively. Toxicity was mild and predominantly mucocutaneous (stomatitis, diarrhea, and rash). Hyperlipidemia was cumulative and was managed with lipid-lowering agents. CONCLUSIONS: CCI-779 was not sufficiently active in melanoma to warrant further testing as a single agent.

Adult↗

Elderly subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for first-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (TAX 326).

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues over whether elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) should receive platinum-based chemotherapy. TAX 326 reported improved survival with docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) versus vinorelbine-cisplatin (VC) for advanced NSCLC. DC and docetaxel-carboplatin (DCb) were better tolerated than VC. We analyzed the efficacy and toxicity in patients ages < 65 and > or = 65 years. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive, TNM Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients were randomized to DC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), d1 q3w), DCb (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/mL.min, d1 q3w), or VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), d1, 8, 15, and 22 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2), d1 q4w). RESULTS: Of 1218 patients, 401 were age > or = 65 years (149/118/134 DC/DCb/VC arms). In the elderly, median survival was 12.6 versus 9.9 months, 1-year survival was 52% versus 41%, 2-year survival was 24% versus 17% for DC versus VC, respectively. DCb survival results were similar to those for VC: median, 9.0 months; 1-year, 38%; 2-year, 19%. Survival outcomes were similar between elderly and younger patients across treatment arms. Compared with younger patients, elderly patients reported moderately higher incidences of NCI CTC (version 1.0) Grade 3-4 asthenia, infection, and pulmonary toxicities across treatment arms, and diarrhea and sensory neurotoxicity for cisplatin-containing arms. Most hematologic toxicities occurred with similar incidences between elderly and younger patients, although neutropenia was slightly increased in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: First-line docetaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy showed similar activity in elderly and younger patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC; elderly patients tolerated docetaxel-platinum well despite experiencing slightly more toxicity than younger patients.

Adult↗

A phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin for patients with advanced stage IIIB or IV NSCLC previously treated with nonplatinum-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (1) and cisplatin (P) are active chemotherapy agents with clinical synergy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the efficacy of IP regimen as a salvage treatment of patients with NSCLC that progressed after nonplatinum-containing regimen(s). METHODS: Eligibility required histologically confirmed NSCLC, bidimensionally measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and progressive disease after nonplatinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of I (65 mg/m2) and P (30 mg/m2) i.v. on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, for a maximum of 6 cycles. An informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS: Between August 2002 and May 2004, 32 patients with median age of 56 years (range, 42-74) were enrolled. Twenty-four (75%) patients were men, and 28 (88%) had ECOG PS 0 or 1. Twenty-five patients had adenocarcinoma and 6 had squamous-cell carcinoma. All patients were evaluated for response and toxicity, and the response rate was 40.6%. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median survival time was found to be 9.3 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 43.8%. Toxicities were moderate and manageable, with 47% G3 and 9% G4 neutropenia, 19% G3 diarrhea, and 22% G3 asthenia. There was no G4 nonhematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The irinotecan and cisplatin combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the patients with advanced NSCLC that progressed after nonplatinum-containing regimen(s).

Adenocarcinoma↗

Amisulpiride augmentation in treatment resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open trial.

Despite the effectiveness of clomipramine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), 40% to 60% of patients who receive an adequate treatment with these agents have significant persisting symptoms. Newer atypical antipsychotic drugs showed efficacy as augmenting agents in patients with OCD resistant to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amisulpiride augmentation in treatment resistant OCD. A total of 20 patients diagnosed with OCD according to DSM-IV criteria and having a history of resistance to treatment with SRIs were included in the study. Amisulpiride 200 mg/day was added to ongoing SRI treatment and titrated up to 600 mg/day in flexible doses. The mean amisulpiride dose was 325 +/- 106 mg/day. The patients were assessed with the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) at baseline and at week 12 of amisulpiride treatment. Side effects were monitored by the UKU side effect rating scale. The reduction in Y-BOCS scores between the baseline (26.7 +/- 6.3) and the end of the treatment (12.5 +/- 2.8) was statistically significant (p=0.0001). The most commonly observed side effects included weight gain (14 patients, 70%), mild sedation (13 patients, 65%) and asthenia (7 patients, 35%). This study has several limitations and, hence, the results are preliminary and require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial. In conclusion, this study suggests that amisulpiride may be a promising option as an augmentation strategy in treatment resistant OCD.

Adult↗

Fluoxetine: a randomized clinical trial in the maintenance of weight loss.

Because current weight-reduction treatments have considerable recidivism, a therapy that could help patients maintain weight loss would be of benefit. A six-center, randomized, double-blind trial compared the effects of the specific serotonin uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine hydrochloride, and placebo on maintenance of weight loss. Obese outpatients who had lost > or = 3.6 kg after 8 weeks of single-blind fluoxetine 60 mg/day in the qualification phase (N=317 [70.4% of patients entered]; mean +/- standard deviation [SD] weight loss, 6.8 +/- 2.8 kg) were randomly assigned to fluoxetine 20 mg/day (N=104), fluoxetine 60 mg/day (N=106), or placebo (N=107) for 40 weeks (maintenance phase). Patients received minimal nutrition/dietary counseling. Qualification phase clinic visits were biweekly; maintenance phase visits were monthly for 4 months, then bimonthly for 6 months. Patients treated with fluoxetine 60 mg/day continued to lose weight for 8 additional weeks (16 weeks total; maximum mean +/- SD weight loss, 7.2 +/- 4.6 kg); those treated with fluoxetine 20 mg/day or placebo began to regain weight. Mean weights remained below baseline values at week 48 (all groups); treatment differences were not statistically significant. Study completion rates were comparable (fluoxetine 20 mg/day, 67.3%; fluoxetine 60 mg/day, 56.6%; placebo, 67.3%; p = 0.175). Among commonly reported adverse events (> 10% incidence), only asthenia was reported statistically significantly (p < 0.050) more frequently with fluoxetine than with placebo. Few patients discontinued for any single adverse event. Fluoxetine 60 mg/day was effective for a longer period than fluoxetine 20 mg/day or placebo in maintaining weight loss. Overall, fluoxetine was safe and well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of dosing interval and optimum dose of cibenzoline.

Fifteen patients with ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) were included in this open study designed to assess the relative efficacy of bid (two times daily) and tid (three times daily) dosing regimens for cibenzoline as compared with qid (four times daily) administration. Patients started therapy with qid administration; this was followed in sequence by tid and bid administration at the maximum effective total daily dose determined during the qid administration. Of the nine patients evaluated for efficacy for suppression of VPCs, eight demonstrated a 75% or greater suppression of VPCs with cibenzoline administered qid (total daily dose of 130-325 mg). This effectiveness was maintained in four patients with a bid regimen and in three with a tid regimen. All four patients who had ventricular tachycardia (VT) had a decrease in the number of VT episodes while receiving cibenzoline (only one of these patients had satisfactory suppression of VPCs at the same dosage regimen). Twelve patients continued to receive extended therapy with cibenzoline for up to two years, as this was considered to be the optimum antiarrhythmic treatment for these patients. Two patients had to be removed from the study and two had the dosage lowered because of adverse reactions (dry mouth, blurred vision, dizziness, congestive heart failure) although in one instance, the congestive heart failure was subsequently considered to be unrelated to cibenzoline. One patient was able to complete the short-term phase of the trial, but was not given extended treatment because of persistent dry mouth. Two patients had treatment discontinued during the extended therapy phase because of adverse reactions (fever, nausea, vomiting, asthenia).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

A comparison of carteolol and nadolol in the treatment of stable angina pectoris.

In a multicenter, dose-ranging, double-blind study, 63 patients diagnosed as having stable angina pectoris were randomly assigned to treatment with carteolol (33 patients) or nadolol (30 patients). Following a 2 to 4-week dose-ranging period, an optimal dose was determined for each patient and treatment with that dose continued for 6 weeks. Data from all 63 patients were analyzed for drug safety; data for 52 patients (27 carteolol and 25 nadolol) were analyzed for drug efficacy. The most commonly chosen dosage levels were 20 mg of carteolol and 80 mg of nadolol. There were no statistically significant differences between the carteolol and nadolol groups in changes in exercise tolerance as reflected by time to onset of angina, end-point of exercise, and onset of 1 mm ST segment change on ECG. Both drugs significantly suppressed tachycardia and double product during treadmill exercise. The nadolol-treated group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in resting heart rate (18.7 bpm) as compared with the carteolol-treated group (3.1 bpm). Carteolol possesses intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), which may account for the fact that carteolol effectively reduces exercise-induced tachycardia while producing relatively little effect on resting heart rate. The frequency of anginal attacks and the use of sublingual nitroglycerin were reduced to a similar extent in both treatment groups. The most commonly reported side effect in both treatment groups was asthenia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of the potent, specific human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir: results of a phase I/II trial and extended follow-up in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

The safety, antiretroviral activity, and pharmacokinetic profile of nelfinavir, a potent and specific inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease, were assessed in a small open-label phase I/II dose-ranging study in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-positive men. A total of 22 patients with baseline plasma HIV RNA > or = 20,000 copies/mL and CD4+ counts between 200 and 500 cells/mm3 were enrolled in the study. Of the 22 patients, 20 were evaluated for activity; 10 patients assigned to 771 mg/day base equivalent (300 mg three times daily) and 10 patients assigned to 1,026 mg/day base equivalent (600 mg twice daily) given monotherapy. A capsule formulation of nelfinavir was used. The initial study period was 28 days; patients showing a virologic response of 1 log10 reduction were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase and addition of nucleoside analogues. A maximally tolerated dose of nelfinavir was not established. A dose-response relationship was observed for four (40%) patients in the 771-mg group and six (60%) patients in the 1,026-mg group experiencing a reduction from baseline in plasma HIV RNA of at lest 1 log during the 28-day study. Of these patients, five sustained the reduction in plasma HIV RNA beyond day 28 (2 patients receiving 771 mg/day and 3 patients receiving 1,026 mg/day). Median increases from baseline in CD4+ counts at day 28 were 216 cell/mm3 and 86 cell/mm3 in the 771-mg and 1,026-mg groups, respectively. After oral administration, median nelfinavir plasma concentrations on day 28 reached a maximum at 1 hour (2,966 ng/mL) in the 771-mg group and at 3 hours (3,157 ng/mL) in the 1,026-mg group. Data for 22 patients were included in the safety analysis; 12 patients (55%) reported at least one grade 2 or worse (moderate, severe, or very severe) adverse event. The most common grade 2 or worse adverse event was diarrhea, reported by two patients (20%) receiving 771 mg/day and seven patients (70%) receiving 1,026 mg/day; followed by nausea, flatulence, asthenia, and headache (each reported in 1 patient [10%] in the 771-mg group) and dizziness (reported in 1 patient [10%] receiving 1,026 mg/day). In the small subgroup (n = 6) who continued taking nelfinavir for longer periods (between 8 and 15 months), virologic responses were sustained in the majority of patients with good tolerability. Nelfinavir is an active HIV-protease inhibitor with favorable pharmacokinetics, good tolerability, and sustained antiviral effects. Results of this early phase I/II dose-ranging study provided data for the safety and antiretroviral activity of nelfinavir and led to the selection of higher doses for phase II/III trials to further optimize virologic and immunologic responses.

Adolescent↗

Giant left atrial myxoma in an elderly patient: natural history over a 7-year period.

We present the case of a 71-year-old woman with a 7-year history of a giant left atrial myxoma. The myxoma was attached to the atrial septum and occupied almost the entire left atrial cavity. The patient was hospitalized 4 times because of dyspnea on exertion, palpitations, fatigue, general asthenia, and weight loss. During prior hospitalizations, the patient had refused cardiac surgery. She developed several complications, including atrial fibrillation, mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, mesenteric embolism, pulmonary edema, and thrombotic stroke. We herein describe the natural history of left atrial myxoma in an elderly patient over a 7-year period.

Aged↗

BotB (botulinum toxin type B): evaluation of safety and tolerability in botulinum toxin type A-resistant cervical dystonia patients (preliminary study).

Botulinum toxin (BTX) injection is considered the treatment of choice for patients with cervical dystonia (torticollis). We conducted a pilot, open-label, dose-escalation study with BTX type B in 12 patients who no longer responded clinically to injections with BTX type A. At the doses tested, BTX type B was safe and well tolerated without evidence of dose-limiting toxicity in this patient population. Mild-to-moderate adverse events generally resolved quickly and included asthenia, pain, nausea, dysphagia, hypertonia, and tremor. No serious adverse events or antibodies to type-B treatment were reported. Low-dosing-session (100-899 units) and high-dosing-session (900-1,500 units) groups were defined based on units administered per dosing session. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale-Severity Scale (TWSTRS-Severity), Patient Analogue Pain Scale, and Physician and Patient Global Assessment Scales were measured during this study. The TWSTRS-Severity mean maximum percent improvement from baseline demonstrated a 9.9% versus 28.8% difference between the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. EFfectiveness was noted for the high-dose group on the Patient Analogue Pain Scale but not on the Global Assessment Scales.

Adult↗