Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Statins”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources

Statins may enhance the proteolytic cleavage of proBDNF: implications for the treatment of depression.

The family of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, collectively known as statins, are used clinically to reduce plasma cholesterol levels. Recent reports indicate that statin therapy is associated with a reduced risk of depression, although the mechanism underlying this antidepressant effect is unknown. Evidence suggests that increasing central BDNF activity plays an important role in the treatment of major depression. In the nervous system, the proteolytic cleavage of pro-BDNF, a BDNF precursor, to BDNF through the tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)-plasmin pathway represents one mechanism that can regulate the action of BDNF. In vitro studies have demonstrated that statins can induce tPA and inhibit plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, the major inhibitor of tPA. It is therefore possible that statins could act through the tPA-plasminogen pathway to increase BDNF and achieve an antidepressant effect. It is suggested that statins could be of therapeutic potential for patients with major depression: especially those that have an abnormality in the tPA-plasminogen pathway or comorbidities relating to cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, BDNF dysfunction has also been implicated in several other neuropsychiatric diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and Rett syndrome. The potential use of statins in these diseases may warrant further exploration.

Antidepressive Agents↗

How to choose a statin after kidney transplantation: case analyses.

Statins are effective to reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein fractions in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, they have an excellent safety profile. Besides cholesterol-lowering properties, statins have additional actions described in the present case report. The diverse effects of these drugs means that many patients with different disease entities, such as cardiovascular diseases, can benefit from their effects. However, the problem of so called "class effect" remains controversial. The question whether each drug within the group is equivalent appears important, as long as statins must be taken long-term and as the therapy affects patient quality of life and survival. To address this question, we present two renal transplant recipients treated with statins. The induction of pharmacokinetic tolerance and damage to hepatic cells during administration of statins is discussed. Presented data suggest that the choice of statin should be based on individual patient requirements and adapted to the individual treatment response.

Adult↗

Statins inhibit reoxygenation-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis: role for glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and transcription factor beta-catenin.

BACKGROUND: Statins may improve left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. We tested whether statins inhibit cardiomyocyte apoptosis through glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3beta) inactivation and evaluated activation of downstream transcription factors. METHODS/RESULTS: Mevastatin and pravastatin activated serine/threonine kinase Akt in neonatal cardiomyocytes dose and time dependently with maximal activation at 15 min/10 microM. Caspase-3 activity was induced 2.73 +/- 0.29-fold by 6 h of hypoxia followed by 18 h of reoxygenation. Pravastatin added at the beginning of the reoxygenation period reduced caspase-3 activation to 1.26 +/- 0.06-fold compared to control cells (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for mevastatin (decreased to 1.98 +/- 0.45-fold, P < 0.05). TUNEL staining of neonatal cardiomyocytes after 24 h reoxygenation and 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining of adult rat cardiomyocytes after 6 h H(2)O(2) showed reduced cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the presence of statin. Analysis of signaling pathways downstream of Akt revealed phosphorylation of GSK3beta. Transcription factor cAMP-responsive element binding (CREB) protein showed weak phosphorylation at serine 133; transcription factor NF-kappaB was not significantly activated after statin treatment as evaluated by EMSA. The GSK3beta target protein beta-catenin was stabilized at 3 h after statin treatment both in neonatal as well as adult rat cardiomyocytes. Transfection with constitutive active GSK3betaS9A sensitized neonatal cardiomyocytes to hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced apoptosis as measured by annexin V/propidium iodide staining. Furthermore, myocardial protein extracts of mice revealed GSK3beta inactivation after administration of pravastatin intraperitoneally. CONCLUSIONS: Statins inhibit cardiomyocyte apoptosis in association with GSK3beta inactivation. Inactivation of GSK3beta leads to stabilization of beta-catenin in cardiomyocytes.

Animals↗

Statins: effective antiatherosclerotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Statins are the most effective agents currently available for lowering plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and are the mainstay of therapy for hyperlipidemia. The statins are highly liver-selective, inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a key enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol. Several large, controlled clinical trials have confirmed significant reductions in rates of coronary heart disease morbidity and death with long-term statin therapy in patients with mild to severe hypercholesterolemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: This review article is based on a literature search of more than 60 relevant articles from peer-reviewed journals. Search engines included Medline and Embase. In surveying clinical and angiographic evidence, we found that statins appear to reduce the incidence of coronary events by slowing the progression of atherosclerosis and preventing atheromatous lesion formation. We found that the 6 statins currently marketed-atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin-differ in their inhibitory action on the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: The use of more potent statins such as atorvastatin and simvastatin affords greater lowering of LDL-C and triglyceride levels, allowing more patients to achieve target goals. The question of how low LDL-C levels should be lowered will be answered by ongoing clinical trials.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Cholesterol lowering with statins reduces exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease.

Coronary flow reserve is mainly influenced by the combination of luminal stenosis and vascular dilation capacity. Thus, after statin treatment, the reduction of ischemic threshold in patients submitted to exercise testing could be intensely influenced by angiographic severity. In this study, we verify the effect of statin treatment on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in hypercholesterolemic patients with a broad range of coronary angiographic severities. Patients with 2 consecutive positive exercise tests, coronary stenosis > or =70%, total cholesterol > or =300 mg/dl, and triglycerides < or =200 mg/dl were randomly assigned to a 16-week treatment period with either diet alone (n = 39) or diet plus statins (simavastatin, n = 31 and pravastatin, n = 10). Statin-treated patients had a significant variation in total cholesterol (-46% vs -2.7%; p <0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-58% vs 0.8%; p <0.01), and high-density cholesterol (+28% vs -6%; p <0.05) in comparison with the diet-only group. After 16 weeks of treatment, 36 patients (92%) in the diet group still had positive exercise tests, whereas only 7 patients (15%) of the statin group had a positive test (p <0.01). The proportion of positive tests was significantly reduced in subgroups of patients with 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel disease. Regarding the severity of coronary stenosis, the proportion of positive tests was significantly reduced in patients with stenosis between 70% and 90% and in patients with stenosis > or =90%. Moreover, the proportion of positive tests tended to decrease to a greater extent in patients with mild coronary disease. In conclusion, cholesterol-lowering treatment with statins reduces exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in hypercholesterolemic patients with mild or severe epicardial coronary stenosis.

Adult↗

The relative role of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in coronary artery disease: evidence from large-scale statin and fibrate trials.

Statin therapy has been remarkably successful in reducing coronary events and improving survival. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the paramount mechanism for the benefit of statins. Although the relation between reduction of risk of coronary artery disease and pretreatment lipid levels has not been fully resolved, a feature of statin therapy emerging from previous large-scale trials is the diminished benefit when the baseline level of LDL-C is low (eg, <125 mg/dL). Increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) with statin therapy are associated with mild reductions in coronary events, indicating that HDL-C is an important element. However, the risk of low HDL-C is not altered by statin therapy, in marked contrast with LDL-C. Because most coronary events have not been prevented in the statin trials, nonstatin lipid therapy, including fibrates, may be necessary to further reduce the unacceptably high rate of coronary artery disease.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Relation of markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and leukocyte count) and statin therapy to long-term mortality in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease.

We evaluated a possible interaction between statins and inflammation in 1,246 patients with angiographically diagnosed coronary artery disease. Four different inflammatory markers were determined: high, sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (p = 0.001), fibrinogen (p = 0.006), von Willebrand factor (p = 0.006), and leukocyte count (p = 0.03); these levels were significantly higher among the 88 patients who died of cardiac causes during follow-up (median 2.9 years) than among survivors. In a multivariate backward stepwise Cox regression mode, only hs-CRP was evaluated to be a significant predictor of death from coronary artery disease. This prediction was lost in statin-treated patients. Compared with patients receiving statin medication, patients without statins did not have increased cardiac mortality (even when low-density lipoprotein [LDL] levels were >125 mg/dl) when hs-CRP levels were not elevated. In contrast, patients without statins and elevated hs-CRP (top quartile) had a 2.3-fold increase in risk for fatal coronary events, independent of LDL levels. In conclusion, only elevated hs-CRP was selected as an independent predictor of death. Statin therapy is associated with elevated hs-CRP, with a risk reduction for fatal coronary events, independent of LDL levels; this, in part, may be explained by the anti-inflammatory effects on atherosclerosis.

Acute-Phase Proteins↗

A pharmacoepidemiological assessment of the effect of statins and fibrates on fibrinogen concentration.

Plasma fibrinogen is strongly associated with cardiovascular morbi-mortality. We investigated in the large cohort of the D.E.S.I.R. (data from an epidemiological study on the insulin resistance syndrome) study, the relationship between change in fibrinogen concentration over a 3-year follow-up and fibrate and statin use. Fibrinogen concentrations were higher at baseline among individuals treated with statins (n=130) compared to those treated with fibrates (n=251), even after adjustment for confounding factors (including total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides) (mean (S.D.): 2.8 (0.6) vs. 3.1 (0.6), P<0.001). We compared change in fibrinogen concentrations at 3 years of follow-up, between individuals who started fibrate (n=126) or statin (n=127) treatment during the follow-up and individuals (n=3906) who stayed without treatment during this period. After adjustment for baseline fibrinogen level, age, sex and changes in total cholesterol, triglycerides and alcohol intake, fibrinogen concentration decreased after fibrate treatment, while it increased after statin treatment and in those not using lipid lowering drugs (-0.07 (0.54) vs. 0.10 (0.54) vs. 0.08 (0.52) g/l respectively, P=0.01). No differences were observed between different statins or different fibrates. In conclusion, fibrates in contrast with statins may combine lipid-lowering with a beneficial effect on fibrinogen. This effect is independent of changes in cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations.

Adult↗

Comparing the effects of five different statins on the HDL subpopulation profiles of coronary heart disease patients.

We compared the effects of five different statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin) on the lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I-containing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subpopulation profiles of 86 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. Patients with established CHD, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (C)>130 mg/dl, and triglyceride (TG)<400 mg/dl, were treated with atorvastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg/day and one of the other four statins at 20, 40, and when available 80 mg/day in increasing doses (4 weeks of each dose) in a randomized crossover fashion. There was an 8-week placebo controlled washout period between different drug treatments. All five statins on each dose resulted in significant reductions in total- and LDL-C compared to placebo treatment. There were also decreases in plasma TG and increases in HDL-C and apoA-I concentrations, but not all treatments changed these parameters significantly. Each statin except fluvastatin improved the HDL subpopulation profile by increasing the concentrations of the large, cholesterol-rich, LpA-I alpha-1 and prealpha-1 HDL subpopulations. CHD patients have significantly lower concentration of the large, LpA-I alpha-1 HDL particles compared to controls. Our data indicate that statins which are the most effective in lowering LDL-C and TG are also the most effective agents in modifying the HDL subpopulation profile in CHD patients towards the patterns found in healthy individuals. The order of efficacy of statins in increasing alpha-1 HDL subpopulation was: atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin.

Adult↗

Statin therapy in a kindred with both apolipoprotein B and low density lipoprotein receptor gene defects.

We studied an extended family of similar genetic and environmental background to determine whether there is a difference in response to statin therapy in those subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH Afrikaner-1 (FH1) or FH Afrikaner-2 (FH2)) compared to those with familial defective apo B-100 (FDB), or both FH plus FDB. Fasting lipid profiles and Lp(a) levels were done on 18 members of the family and then repeated following 6 weeks of therapy with simvastatin 20 mg daily. Statin therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) by 31% in those with FH (n = 7); 29.8% in FDB (n = 5) and 25.4% in those with both FDB and FH (n = 5). There was no response to statin therapy in the single subject with both FH1, FH2, as well as FDB. Lp(a) levels did not change significantly either within or between any of the groups following statin therapy (FH from 6.5 (1.2-72.3) to 5.3 (1.2-52.3), FDB from 6.1 (4.70-71) to 8.2 (5.7 79) and FDB plus FH from 4.5 (2.6-17.4) to 3.1 (1.9-24) mg/dl). Statins are equally effective in lowering LDL-C in related subjects with heterozygous FH, FDB or both FDB plus FH. The ability of statins to lower LDL-C in FDB is probably due to increased hepatic uptake of lipoprotein precursors of LDL that can bind via apo E receptors. Lp(a) concentration is not reduced by drugs that stimulate LDL receptor activity implying that LDL receptors do not contribute greatly to normal clearance of Lp(a) in hypercholesterolaemic subjects with defects in receptor-mediated endocytosis of LDL.

Animals↗

Statins and chronic heart failure: do we need a large-scale outcome trial?

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are of proven clinical benefit in coronary heart disease, at least in those patients who do not have overt chronic heart failure (CHF). However, as there have been no prospective clinical trials of statins in CHF patients, the question arises as to whether the benefits observed in the absence of CHF can be necessarily inferred in those patients in whom CHF is established. In this review, the evidence base stating support of the use of statins in CHF is presented, as well as theoretical considerations as to why these agents may not necessarily be of benefit in this setting. The beneficial potential of statins clearly relates to their plaque stabilization properties and associated improvements in endothelial function, which together should reduce the risk of further infarction and, perhaps, the ischemic burden on the failing ventricle. Furthermore, these agents may have beneficial effects independent of lipid lowering. These include actions on neoangiogenesis, downregulation of AT(1) receptors, inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine activity and favorable modulation of the autonomic nervous system. The potential adverse effects of statins in CHF include reduction in levels of coenzyme Q10 (which may further exacerbate oxidative stress in CHF) and loss of the protection that lipoproteins may provide through binding and detoxifying endotoxins entering the circulation via the gut. In support of these possibilities are epidemiologic data linking a lower serum cholesterol with a poorer prognosis in CHF. These uncertainties indicate the need for a definitive outcome trial to assess the efficacy and safety of statins in CHF, despite their current widespread, non-evidence based use in this population.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Raised serum levels of soluble CD40 ligand in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: downregulatory effect of statin therapy.

OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we investigated the effects of statins on serum levels of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic disease seems to involve inflammatory and immunologic mechanisms, and sCD40L has recently been identified as one of the key players in the atherosclerotic process. HMG-Co A reductase inhibitors, statins, have been recognized as immunomodulators and reduce cardiovascular events and mortality, but the effects of statins on sCD40L has not been clarified. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, as part of the Atorvastatin versus Simvastatin on Atherosclerosis Progression (ASAP) trial, 110 patients with FH were given atorvastatin 80 mg/daily (n = 57) or simvastatin 40 mg/daily (n = 53) for two years. RESULTS: Our main findings were: 1) at baseline patients with FH had significantly higher (approximately 27-fold) serum levels of sCD40L than healthy controls; 2) statin therapy markedly decreased serum levels of sCD40L (approximately 40% reduction); 3) this decrease in sCD40L was found during both "aggressive" (i.e., atorvastatin) and "conventional" (i.e., simvastatin) statin therapy and was not correlated with the degree of reduction in cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may suggest enhanced CD40L-CD40 interaction in FH and that this inflammatory response may be downregulated by statins.

Atorvastatin↗

Statins: panacea for sepsis?

Sepsis occurs when the immune system responds to a localised infection at a systemic level, thereby causing tissue damage and organ dysfunction. Statins have proven health benefits in many diseases involving vascular inflammation and injury. Recent animal data suggest that the administration of a statin before a sepsis-inducing insult reduces morbidity and improves survival. The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of statins, collectively referred to as pleiotropic effects, lend biological plausibility to such findings. Limited human data hint at reduced mortality rates in bacteraemic patients, and a reduced risk of sepsis in patients with bacterial infections concurrently taking statins. These lines of evidence point to a potential new treatment and prevention modality for sepsis. The stage is set for randomised controlled clinical trials that will determine whether statins represent a safe and beneficial treatment in critically ill, septic patients and whether statins are effective at preventing sepsis in high-risk clinical settings.

Animals↗

Are statins a treatment option for multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) are limited. The immunomodulatory drugs interferon beta and glatiramer acetate are only partly effective in reducing the relapse rate, slowing disease progression, and diminishing the number and volume of lesions on MRI. Mitoxantrone is an immunosuppressant approved for the treatment of active forms of relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS, but is dose-limited owing to its potential cardiotoxicity. Thus, identifying new effective therapeutic options with few side-effects is highly desirable. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Evidence has emerged that statins, which are inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, have immunomodulatory effects. Recent reports showed that statins prevent and reverse chronic and relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of MS. Furthermore, in vitro experiments with human immune cells have shown an immunomodulatory profile of statins comparable to that of interferon beta. An open label clinical trial of simvastatin for MS revealed a significant decrease in the number and volume of new MRI lesions and a favourable safety profile. WHERE NEXT?: The obvious advantage of statins over existing MS therapies is their oral route of dosing. Statins might be beneficial for MS patients as monotherapy or as an add-on to established disease modifying drugs. As the evidence of the benefit of statins in MS is currently insufficient, large controlled clinical trials are needed. The first of these trials is about to start.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Patients' perspectives on statin therapy for treatment of hypercholesterolaemia: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Health Care Practitioners' attempts to implement secondary prevention targets for coronary heart disease (CHD) may be restricted by low rates of persistence with statin therapy. There is a need to understand why some patients, despite having established CHD and elevated cholesterol, do not comply with their prescribed statin regimen. AIM: To explore patients' perspectives on compliance with statin therapy. SETTING: Primary care, West of Scotland. METHODS: The research approach was qualitative. Thirty-three patients prescribed statin therapy and identified as having different patterns of compliance (poor moderate and good) were interviewed. The in-depth interviews were conducted on a one to one basis. Patients prescribed statin therapy for less than three months were excluded. Data were analysed thematically with the assistance of QSR Nudist. FINDINGS: From analysis of the narrative data, two broad categories, i.e. 'Patient-health care provider communication' and 'Health beliefs' were identified. These categories encompassed six main themes: 'Initiation of therapy'; 'Subsequent feedback'; 'Sources of misconceptions'; 'Unconditional acceptance'; 'Conditional acceptance'; 'Deferment and Rejection'. Acceptance of and compliance with statin therapy appeared to be associated with the provision, interpretation and feedback of information during patient-practitioner consultations, and patients' beliefs about personal health status, cholesterol, and recommended cholesterol-lowering strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' beliefs and understanding about cholesterol, and the role of cholesterol modifying strategies should be determined prior to the initiation of therapy and at appropriate intervals thereafter.

Adult↗

The choice of hormone replacement therapy or statin therapy in the treatment of hyperlipidemic postmenopausal women.

Evidence based treatment of cardiovascular risk factors on outcome in women is still inconclusive given the very large numbers needed to achieve a significant difference in cardiovascular event. Although numerous studies of the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on risk factors have suggested benefit, the only data from a randomised control trial of HRT in secondary prevention was neutral. Coronary disease-primary prevention: (a) Statins: Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TEX CAPS). The only randomised controlled trial (RCT) to include women. There were fewer coronary heart disease (CHD) events in women but no difference in mortality. (b) HRT: no completed RCT-the results from Womens Health Initiative (WHI) and Women Intervention Study of Long Duration of Oestrogen in the Menopause (WISDOM) are awaited, the former likely to complete in 2004. There are numerous reports of positive observational epidemiological studies for HRT. There is little evidence for statin use in women who will probably not qualify for treatment on global CHD risk assessment, familial hypercholesterolemia and type 2 diabetes excepted. HRT is, therefore, not only appropriate for its multiple effects on lipoproteins, vascular function and insulin sensitivity but also for prevention of osteoporosis. Coronary disease- SECONDARY PREVENTION: (a) Statins: the major measurable effect of these drugs is to reduce total and LDL cholesterol. In RCT trials, the Scandanavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), the Cholesterol and Recurrent Event (CARE) and Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID), approximately 20% of subjects were female, in whom CHD events, but not CHD or total mortality were reduced. (b) HRT: there is data available from a single RCT of continuous combined premarin and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) against placebo, The Heart Estrogen Replacement Study (HERS). A study of 2763 women and mean duration of 4.1 years. This study was neutral, with no reduction in CHD events or mortality. There were more events in the first year, and fewer in years 3-5. Other studies of HRT have been observational and positive for HRT. The effects of treatment on lipoproteins with statins, HRT and combination of statin and HRT have been investigated. In secondary prevention for hyperlipidemic women to achieve cholesterol <5, low density lipoprotein (LDL)<3 mmol/l statins will be first choice, possibly with HRT additionally for its other benefits on cardiovascular risk factors.

Coronary Disease↗

Immunosuppressive effects of statins.

3-Hydroxy-3-methhylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are effective lipid lowering agents, extensively used in medical practice [Circulation 2000;101:207; J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:2935]. Statins have never been shown to be involved in the immune response, although reports have suggested a better outcome of cardiac transplantation in patients under pravastatin therapy [New Engl J Med 1995;333:621; Circulation 1997;96:1398]. Major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II) molecules are directly involved in the activation of T lymphocytes and in the control of the immune response. Whereas only a limited number of specialized cell types express MHC-II constitutively, numerous other cells become MHC-II positive upon induction by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) [Annu Rev Immunol 1996;14:301]. This complex regulation is under the control of the transactivator CIITA [Science 1994;265:106]. Recently, we demonstrated that statins act as direct inhibitors of induction of MHC-II expression by IFN-gamma and thus as repressors of MHC-II-mediated T cell activation [Nat Med 2000;6:1399; Swiss Med Wkly 2001;131:41]. This effect of statins is due to inhibition of the inducible promoter IV of the transactivator CIITA. Interestingly, this inhibition is specific for inducible MHC-II expression and does not concern constitutive expression of CIITA and MHC-II. In repressing induction of MHC-II, and subsequent T lymphocyte activation, statins therefore behave as a novel type of immunomodulator. This unexpected effect provides a scientific rationale for suggesting the use of statins as novel immunosuppressors, not only in organ transplantation but in numerous other pathologies as well.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Genetic polymorphisms in emerging cardiovascular risk factors and response to statin therapy.

Current strategies for both the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) focus on the traditional risk factors, such as hypertension, smoking cessation, and cholesterol, as the primary determinants of the cardiac risk profile, with particular emphasis on the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to targeted goal levels as endorsed by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII). Large primary and secondary prevention trials with the hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have demonstrated varying reductions in cardiovascular events associated with similar changes in LDL-C levels, suggesting statins may possess additional beneficial effects on other risk factors. Retrospective analyses of many statin trials have evaluated the association between several polymorphic candidate genes (apolipoprotein E, stromelysin-1, beta-fibrinogen, cholesteryl ester transfer protein, lipoprotein lipase, hepatic lipase, and platelet glycoprotein III) which have been identified as predictors of disease severity and both metabolic and clinical response to statin therapy. These results suggest that statin therapy improves plasma lipid profiles in all patients, but preferentially benefits individuals who carry a high risk, variant genotype for these risk factors as compared to individuals with the wild-type genotype. These observations suggest that determining individual patient genotype may be useful in optimizing the benefits of statin therapy. These hypothesis-generating data need to be prospectively evaluated in genotyped patients.

Cholesterol, LDL↗