Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PROSTATECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Is Hispanic race an independent risk factor for pathological stage in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy?

PURPOSE: Hispanic-Americans are the most rapidly growing population in the United States. Although many studies have assessed differences in pathological stage at radical prostatectomy between white and black American men, to our knowledge none has assessed it in Hispanic men. We compared pathological stage at radical prostatectomy in contemporaneous groups of Hispanic and white American men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 141 consecutive Hispanic and 314 consecutive white American men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer from 1995 to 2002 at a single institution, as performed by one of us (ETG or MCB). Preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), age at diagnosis, race, clinical stage, biopsy and specimen Gleason score, pathological stage, specimen volume and calculated specimen PSA density were collected for each patient. Data were compared using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Biopsy Gleason score, biopsy Gleason score distribution, specimen Gleason score, specimen Gleason distribution, pathological stage, calculated specimen PSA density, Gleason score change from biopsy to specimen and specimen prostate volume did not differ statistically between Hispanic and white men. Mean age and median preoperative PSA were statistically significantly higher in Hispanic vs white men (62.1 vs 59.5 years and 6.6 vs 5.4 ng/ml, respectively). In addition, no differences in the incidence of positive surgical margins, nonorgan confined disease, seminal vesicle invasion or positive lymph nodes were found between Hispanic and white men undergoing radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that in contemporaneously treated groups of Hispanic and white men at the same institution pathological stage was similar between the groups. To our knowledge this is the largest comparison of surgically treated prostate cancer between these 2 groups. Further followup in terms of PSA outcome in these groups is planned.

Hispanic or Latino↗
PubMed2004

Application of a fixed retractor system to facilitate laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We report application of a fixed retractor system for reduction of the steep Trendelenberg position required to achieve deep pelvic access for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fixed retractor system consisting of a flexible arm that can be locked in position and an expandable 5 mm laparoscopic retractor were used to gain exposure to the deep pelvis. We describe in detail our technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy incorporating the fixed retractor system to facilitate each step of the procedure. RESULTS: Application of the fixed retractor system reduced steep Trendelenberg position requirements for adequate pelvic exposure from 25 to 15 degrees in our most recent 24 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. Furthermore, application of the retractor system reduced the need for an experienced laparoscopic assistant. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the fixed retractor system for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy eliminated the requirement for the steep Trendelenberg position to achieve access to the deep pelvis. Visceral structures were safely and indefatigably retracted from the operative field. The technique also allowed the surgical assistant to assist the surgeon with local retraction and aspiration.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2004

Feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for patients with high risk or locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a phase I/II study.

PURPOSE: We determined the feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in locally advanced (stage T3 or greater) and/or high risk tumors (Gleason 8 to 10 and/or serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng/ml). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrollment criteria included clinical stage T1 to 2 with any Gleason grade and PSA greater than 20 ng/ml, clinical stage T3 to 4 with any serum PSA or Gleason grade, or any clinical stage with biopsy Gleason grade of 8 to 10 and any serum PSA. All patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy during chemotherapy (4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin and estramustine) followed by radical prostatectomy. Nerve sparing was decided on an individual basis and a nerve graft was offered to those who underwent unilateral or bilateral nerve resection. Perioperative morbidity, mortality and delayed complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled. After chemohormonal therapy clinical stage was less in 39% of patients and greater in 36%. Bilateral nerve sparing was performed in 3 patients and the remaining 33 underwent either unilateral or bilateral neurovascular bundle resection with nerve grafts performed in 17 (52%). Deep vein thrombosis (22%) was the most frequent complication of chemotherapy. Minor postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients. At a median followup of 29 months (range 5 to 51) after radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) were continent and 5 (15%) preoperatively potent men remained potent. The positive surgical margin rate was 22%. Of all subjects 45% remain free from biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy can be performed with low morbidity. Positive surgical margin rates are low. This approach yielded good local control of disease, however impact on tumor recurrence and survival is not known.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

UNLABELLED: We examined whether invasion of lymphatic and/or vascular vessels (LVI), or perineural spaces (PNI) is associated with prostate cancer features and outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 630 consecutive men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. LVI and PNI examination was part of the routine specimen evaluation. RESULTS: Foci of LVI were identified in 32 patients (5%) and 381 (60.5%) had PNI. LVI and PNI were associated with clinical stage T2 disease, higher biopsy and final Gleason sum, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, positive surgical margins and a higher percent of positive biopsy cores (p <0.001). LVI was associated with metastases to regional lymph nodes and higher preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (p <0.001 and 0.004, respectively). PNI and LVI were associated with an increased risk of rapid biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy on univariate (p <0.001 and 0.001, respectively) but not on multivariate analysis. LVI was associated with shorter prostate specific antigen doubling time after biochemical progression (p = 0.012) and higher probabilities of failed local salvage radiation therapy (p = 0.0169), distant metastases (p <0.001) and death (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Only LVI is associated with metastases to regional and distant sites, and most importantly with overall survival. LVI and PNI are associated with established markers of biologically aggressive disease and rapid biochemical progression in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Our findings support the routine evaluation of LVI status in radical prostatectomy specimens and its inclusion in predictive models for clinical outcomes, since it appears to be a pathological marker of the lethal phenotype of prostate cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Continuous needle vented foley catheter suction for urinary leak after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Prolonged urinary leakage from the urethrovesical anastomotic site after radical retropubic prostatectomy is a relatively uncommon complication. After the failure of other conservative measures we successfully overcame this problem using a Foley catheter needle vented suction technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anastomotic leakage was noted after retropubic prostatectomy. After the failure of conservative techniques, including catheter traction, passive drainage and active catheter suction, needle vented suction was used. An 18 gauge needle was inserted into the plastic suction tubing attached to the Foley catheter to prevent suction occlusion of the eye of the Foley catheter by the bladder mucosa. RESULTS: Needle vented suction successfully treated urinary leakage after radical retropubic prostatectomy in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of prolonged anastomotic urinary leakage after radical retropubic prostatectomy needle vented suction can be considered an alternative conservative approach to treatment.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Open retropubic simple prostatectomy is occasionally performed for symptomatic, large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia. We describe the technique of laparoscopic simple retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since August 2001 at our 2 institutions laparoscopic simple retropubic prostatectomy has been performed in 17 patients with symptomatic significant prostatomegaly on transrectal ultrasonography (60 gm or greater, mean 93). Essential aspects of our 5 port technique are transverse cystotomy just proximal to the prostatovesical junction, subcapsular plane development, prostatic adenomectomy, prostatic fossa trigonization and prostatic capsule suture repair. Demographic, perioperative and outcome data were recorded. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 156 minutes (range 85 to 380), blood loss was 516 ml (range 100 to 2,500), hospital stay was 48 hours (range 15 to 110), and Foley catheter duration was 6.3 days (range 3 to 7). Mean specimen weight on pathological examination was 72 gm (range 32 to 120). Five patients (29%) required blood transfusion. Complications occurred in 3 patients (19%), that is intraoperative hemorrhage, catheter clot obstruction and duodenal ulcer bleeding in 1 each. All patients reported complete continence during a followup period of 1 month to 2 years. Considerable improvement from baseline was noted in American Urological Association score (preoperative vs postoperative 24.5 vs 9.9) and the maximum urine flow rate (preoperative vs postoperative 7 vs 22.8 cc per minute). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic simple retropubic prostatectomy for large benign prostate hyperplasia is feasible. Our initial experience is presented.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Histological alterations in cavernous tissue after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy often results in erectile dysfunction because of lesions to the erectile nerves. In this study we evaluated histomorphological alterations in cavernous smooth muscle and collagen content after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 19 patients between 57 and 69 years old with prostate adenocarcinoma and normal erectile function, as reported and validated by RigiScan (UroHealth Systems, Laguna Niguel, California) testing, underwent corpora cavernosa biopsy in the operating room before radical prostatectomy, and 2 and 12 months after surgery. No patient underwent hormone therapy before or after surgery and none was diabetic. Elastic fibers (manual counting), muscle specific actin (immunostaining) and collagen content (computerized morphometric imaging) were measured in the 3 biopsies. RESULTS: In all cases the first postoperative histological assessment revealed some disorganization. Trabecular elastic fibers (p <0.0003) and smooth muscle fibers were decreased and collagen content was significantly increased (p <0.0003) compared with preoperative biopsies. One year after surgery elastic fibers (p <0.0003) and smooth muscle fibers were decreased and collagen content was significantly increased (p <0.0003) compared with the first postoperative biopsy. Moreover, organized collagen and trabecular protocollagen deposits were increased. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosis in the corpora cavernosa after radical prostatectomy probably results from denervation and/or an ischemic process, which is caused in turn by the ligation of anomalous pudendal artery branches or of venous plexuses that drain to or from the corpora cavernosa. Fibrosis and the subsequent loss in elasticity and function of erectile tissue probably together cause erectile dysfunction.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

PURPOSE: A strong association between surgeon, hospital volume and postoperative morbidity of radical prostatectomy has been demonstrated. While better outcomes are associated with high volume surgeons, the degree of variation in outcomes among surgeons has not been fully examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a linked database from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries and federal Medicare claims data, we analyzed outcomes of consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 1996. We focused on variations in several measures of morbidity (perioperative complications, late urinary complications and long-term incontinence) among patients of high volume surgeons, defined as those with 20 or more patients in the study period. After adjusting for hospital, surgeon volume and case mix, we examined the extent to which variations in the rates of adverse outcomes differed among surgeons for all 3 end points. RESULTS: Of the 999 surgeons 16% (159) performed 48.7% (5,238) of the 10,737 radical prostatectomies during the study. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.5%, the major postoperative complication rate was 28.6%, late urinary complications 25.2% (major events 16%) and long-term incontinence 6.7%. For all 3 morbidity outcomes the variation among surgeons in the rate of complications was significantly greater than that expected by chance (p =0.001 for each) after adjustment of covariates. Furthermore, surgeons with better (or worse) than average results with regard to 1 outcome were likely to have better (or worse, respectively) results with regard to the other 2 outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity end points that directly affect quality of life showed significant variability among high volume providers. Surgeons who performed well in 1 area (eg postoperative complications) performed well in others. These results further suggest that variations in surgical technique and postoperative care lead to variations in outcomes after radical prostatectomy, indicating that outcomes of this operation are sensitive to small differences in performance.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases.

PURPOSE: The introduction of robotic assistance has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and reduce the steep learning curve associated with conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We report on our experience with robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients underwent robotic radical prostatectomy during 18 months. Prospective data collection included a quality of life (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) questionnaire, basic demographics, prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage and Gleason grade. Operative outcome measures included operative time, estimated blood loss and complications. Postoperative outcome measures included hospital stay, catheter time, pathology, PSA and return of continence. RESULTS: Average operative time was 141 minutes with an estimated blood loss of 75 cc. The intraoperative complication rate was 1% with no mortality, reexploration or transfusion. Of the patients 95% were discharged home on postoperative day 1 (1 to 3) with hematocrit averaging 34.5 (range 25 to 45). The average difference in preoperative and postoperative hematocrit was 3 points (range -2 to 15). Average catheter time was 7.2 days (range 5 to 15). The positive margin rate was 10.5% for the entire series, 5.7% for T2 tumors, 28.5% (T3a), 20% (T3b) and 33% (T4a). Of the patients 95% had undetectable PSA (less than 0.1 ng/ml) at average followup of 9.7 months. Continence at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 47%, 78%, 89%, 92% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy is promising. The learning curve was approximately 20 to 25 cases. With a structured methodical approach we were able to implement robotics safely and effectively into our community practice with minimal patient morbidity, and good oncological and functional outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures.

PURPOSE: We review our experience with endoscopic (totally) extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) as first line therapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 700 consecutive patients underwent EERPE. Mean patient age was 63.4 years (range 42 to 77). Mean preoperative prostate specific antigen was 10.7 ng/ml (range 1.4 to 82). A total of 206 patients (29.4%) had a history of previous lower abdominal or pelvic surgery including inguinal hernioplasty with mesh placement and 43 patients (6.1%) had a history of prostatic intervention (transurethral resection of the prostate, high intensity focused ultrasound, Millin prostatectomy, radiotherapy). After preparation of the preperitoneal space the technique of EERPE duplicates the steps of classic open descending retropubic radical prostatectomy including a nerve sparing EERPE when indicated. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 151 minutes (range 50 to 320). There was no conversion and the transfusion rate was 0.9% in 6. Four patients (0.6%) had intraoperative rectal injuries which were treated endoscopically with a 2-layer suture. A total of 14 patients (2%) required early and 3 patients (0.4%) required late postoperative reintervention. Pathological stage was pT2a in 89 patients (12.7%), pT2b in 54 (7.7%), pT2c in 245 (35%), pT3a in 229 (32.7%), pT3b in 79 (11.2%) and pT4 in 4 patients (0.6%). Positive surgical margins were found in 10.8% (42 of 388) of patients with a pT2 tumor and in 31.2% (96 of 308) of patients with a pT3 tumor. Pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 266 patients (38%), of whom 14 (5.3%) were found to have lymph node involvement. Mean catheterization time was 6.2 days. Six months after surgery 83.8% of the patients were completely continent, 10.4% needed 1 to 2 pads daily and 5.8% of patients needed more than 2 pads daily. Of all patients who underwent nerve sparing procedures, 100 patients had a postoperative followup of 6 months. Of the 66 patients with the unilateral nerve sparing approach 8 (12.1%) had erections sufficient for intercourse and 16 of 34 patients (47.1%) with the bilateral nerve sparing procedure had erections sufficient for intercourse with or without the help of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this series are promising. Perioperative morbidity is low, and short-term oncological and functional results are favorable. Although the followup is too short to draw definite conclusions, it is obvious that a nerve sparing approach in EERPE is feasible and reproducible. Our data demonstrate that EERPE can be performed with equal efficacy and results compared with laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy, while providing the ease and safety of a totally extraperitoneal approach, completely avoiding intraperitoneal complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Robot assisted prostatectomy (RAP) is more costly than traditional radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) under the cost structures at certain hospitals. However, this finding may not be the case in all care settings. We investigated the sensitivity of RAP and RRP inpatient costs to variations in length of stay (LOS), local hospitalization costs and robotic case volume in the specialist and generalist settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a model of RAP vs RRP costs in the specialist and generalist settings using published data on operative time and LOS, and cost data from our academic medical center. All inpatient cost centers were included, namely surgery costs, professional fees, postoperative care, robotic equipment and service. Extensive 1 and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Our base case model demonstrated a cost premium for RAP vs RRP of USD $783 and $195 in the specialist and generalist settings, respectively. Sensitivity analysis of our model assumptions demonstrated that RAP could achieve cost equivalence with RRP at a surgical volume of 10 cases weekly. If case volume increased to 14 cases weekly, RAP would be less expensive than RRP in some practice settings in which RAP LOS was less than 1.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The inpatient costs of robotic assisted prostatectomy are volume dependent and cost equivalence with generalist radical retropubic prostatectomy is possible at higher volume RAP specialty centers. While RAP may be cost competitive with RRP at high cost hospitals or high volume RAP specialist centers, this procedure would exist at a cost premium to RRP in other practice settings.

Health Care Costs↗
PubMed2005

Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance.

Complete removal of the tumor by surgery offers the best chance for cancer cure; however, many prostate cancer patients who have negative surgical margins at radical prostatectomy will still experience local and distant tumor recurrence. In other organs, the closest distance between tumor and resection margin has prognostic significance. This has not been adequately studied in prostatectomy specimens. We undertook a prospective study of 278 consecutive margin-negative whole-mount prostatectomy cases. The anatomic location and closest distance between tumor and resection margin, measured with an ocular micrometer, were analyzed. All the slides were reviewed by a single pathologist, and data were collected prospectively. The closest distance between tumor and resection margin ranged from 0.02 to 5.0 mm (mean, 0.7 mm; median, 0.5 mm) and correlated with patient age (P = 0.03), prostate weight (P = 0.002), Gleason score (P = 0.001), pathologic stage (P = 0.01), tumor volume (P < 0.001), and perineural invasion (P < 0.001). The closest distance between tumor and resection margin was not a significant predictor of PSA recurrence in univariate or multivariate logistic regression; and we do not, therefore, advocate reporting the closest distance between tumor and resection margin as a standard part of the surgical pathology report on prostatectomy specimens.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Significance of prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is expected to be undetectable after radical prostatectomy unless there is residual disease or disease progression. The aim of this study was to confirm the usefulness of serum PSA measurements in monitoring patients after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We conducted a study of 50 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 or small T3 prostate cancer, analyzed serum PSA levels before and after surgery and compared the pathological findings and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Postoperative PSA elevation (PSA failure) was noted in 13% of patients with organ-confined disease (OCD), 43% with positive surgical margins and/or seminal vesicle involvement (PSM/SVI), and 60% with positive lymph nodes (N+). Postoperative clinical failure was noted in 8 patients, and all were preceded by PSA failures. The 3-year PSA failure-free rates were 86.5%, 32.1%, and 40.7% and the 3-year clinical failure-free rates were 100%, 67.5%, and 73.5% in patients with OCD, PSM/SVI and N+, respectively. CONCLUSION: An elevation of serum PSA levels after radical prostatectomy was a sensitive indicator of persistent disease after surgery, and preceded clinical manifestations of disease progression.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Ultrasensitive assay of prostate-specific antigen for early detection of residual cancer after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Perhaps the greatest value of PSA determination in the treatment of prostate cancer is in determining persistent disease after a radical prostatectomy. We investigated the ability of an ultrasensitive PSA assay to detect residual prostate cancer in men at risk for recurrence after a radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Using the Immulite third-generation PSA assay (detection limit, less than 0.003 ng/mL), and the standard IMx PSA assay, we determined PSA levels in 205 serum samples serially obtained from 34 men after a radical prostatectomy. The average days from surgery to serum sampling was 430 (range, 63 to 1296). Patients were classified as having nonaggressive or aggressive cancers, based on clinicopathologic findings. A biochemical relapse was arbitrarily defined. RESULTS: All 17 patients with nonaggressive cancers had PSA values of less than 0.02 ng/mL throughout the sampling period. Two of these patients (12%) had 2 or more consecutive PSA increases and were considered as a biochemical relapse. In contrast, 14 (82%) of 17 patients with aggressive cancers fit criteria of a biochemical relapse. All of the relapses were identified within 2 years after surgery. The IMx assay detected only 7 biochemical relapses during the same sampling period. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Immulite PSA assay, relapse detection times may be shortened allowing for most serological recurrences to be detected within 2 years after a radical prostatectomy. Patients with aggressive cancers may require frequent postoperative PSA determinations with a highly sensitive PSA assay which would allow early intervention when treatments for relapse are effective.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Endocrine therapy with or without radical prostatectomy for T1b-T3N0M0 prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively compared the 5-year survival rates of T1b-T3N0M0 prostate cancer patients treated either by endocrine therapy plus radical prostatectomy or endocrine therapy alone. METHODS: Clinical T1b-T3N0M0 prostate cancer patients were enrolled at 104 institutions in Japan. They were assigned to study 1 (n = 176), if they were indicated to prostatectomy, if not indicated, they were assigned to study 2 (n = 151). The indication of prostatectomy was based on the clinical judgement of physicians and/or patients. Those assigned to study 1 underwent prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without preoperative androgen deprivation. Those assigned to study 2 were treated with leuprorelin acetate with or without chlormadinone acetate. They were followed-up every 3 months until death or for 5 years and over. RESULTS: Those assigned to study 1 were younger (mean age 67.2 vs 75.7 years), less advanced in clinical stage, and had lower prostate specific antigen levels (mean 43.8 vs 103.6 ng/mL). Death for any reason was observed less frequently in study 1 (n = 29, 16%) than study 2 (n = 50, 33%), and the 5-year overall survival rate was higher in study 1 (87 vs. 68%). However, prostate cancer deaths were comparatively seldom (9% in study 1 and 7% in study 2), resulting in the identical 5-year cause specific survival rate in both study groups (91%). In both study groups the overall survival was almost equal to the natural survival of age-matched men. CONCLUSIONS: Endocrine therapy offers a reasonable survival rate in T1b-T3 prostate cancer patients within a 5-year follow-up. Observation will be extended to determine 10-year outcomes.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

Early catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

AIM: We investigated the feasibility and safety of the early removal of urethral catheters 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy. METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with the intent of early catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 3. Catheter removal was based on postoperative cystograms performed on POD 2. Patients were analyzed using a validated prostate cancer specific questionnaire (University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Symptom Index) to determine quality of life outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was also used to evaluate if any of the preoperative or intraoperative parameters were able to predict the success of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy. RESULTS: The catheter was removed on POD 3 in 67 of 70 patients (97%) excluding three patients with moderate or severe extravasation on postoperative cystograms. Of the 67 patients, 53 (76%) were successful in early catheter removal, but the remaining 14 (24%) patients experienced urinary retention within 48 h and were treated with simple catheter replacement for 1 or 2 days. Two patients developed anastomotic strictures 3 and 4 months postoperatively, which were managed by dilation alone. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that no leak during an intraoperative leak test was the only independent predictor of success for early catheter removal (P = 0.0069; odds ratio, 6.667; 95% confidence interval, 1.682-26.428). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that early catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy is feasible in patients who show a negative intraoperative leak test. Postoperative monitoring of more patients is needed to determine if the early catheter removal is widely applicable.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the present study were to characterize, according to tumor significance, the clinicopathological features of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy, and to determine useful parameters for predicting insignificant disease before surgery. METHODS: In this series, we included 195 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer at our institution between January 1999 and November 2003. Several clinicopathological factors were analyzed, focusing on whether the largest tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens was >/=0.5 cm(3) or <0.5 cm(3), which is the criterion defined to distinguish insignificant cancer from significant cancer. RESULTS: Potentially insignificant cancer was detected in 28 of 195 patients (14.4%). There were significant differences between patients with insignificant disease and those with significant disease in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) as well as all biopsy parameters, with the exception of biopsy Gleason score. Furthermore, final pathological examination demonstrated that these two patient groups showed significant differences in Gleason score and the incidence of extraprostatic disease extension. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that tumor volume in the prostatectomy specimens was significantly associated with serum PSA and all biopsy parameters; however, each of the correlations was comparatively weak. There was no single parameter that could viewed as a useful predictor of tumor significance. The best model for predicting insignificant tumor was the combined use of biopsy Gleason score <7 and percent of positive biopsy core (PPBC) <15%; however, the further addition of serum PSA <10 ng/mL to these two parameters failed to enhance the predictive value of cancer significance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that clinicopathological findings suggesting favorable features are well observed in patients with potentially insignificant prostate cancer compared to those with significant prostate cancer, and the combination of a biopsy Gleason score <7 and PPBC <15% might be useful as a predictor of insignificant disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Utility of extracorporeal traction with nylon thread for easier vesicourethral anastomosis in laparoscopic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Vesicourethral anastomosis in laparoscopic prostatectomy is a very difficult procedure. Our purpose in this study was to evaluate a new method using extracorporeal bladder neck traction with nylon thread for vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by this technique, and we evaluated anastomosis time, operative time, and postoperative status of vesicourethral anastomosis. RESULTS: It was possible to shorten both anastomosis time and operative time by this procedure, and to obtain a hermetic anastomosis without higher risk of incontinence, stricture, or leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal bladder neck traction with nylon thread is a very useful procedure to carry out easier vesicourethral anastomosis, especially for a surgeon's initial experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗