Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Rationale for endoscopic management of adenoma of the papilla of Vater: options and limitations.

BACKGROUND: Several studies and our own results prove that endoscopic therapy in selected cases of benign adenomas is safe and technically feasible. In patients refusing surgery or patients with high comorbidity and poor physical health status, endoscopic resection is an excellent alternative. DISCUSSION: The decision for endoscopic or surgical excision of adenomas is determined by general health status, histology, size, location, and depth of the lesion. In carcinoma of the papilla of Vater it is important to assess the tumoral ductal infiltration correctly to determine whether endoscopic resection is a viable option. Intraductal ultrasound is essential before initiating treatment and it therefore contributes to conservative therapy in patients with tumors of the papilla of Vater. Temporary placement of a short pancreatic duct stent may protect against pancreatitis and might allow more excessive ablation of adenomatous tissue, especially around the pancreatic duct orifice. After endoscopic sphincterotomy, biliary and pancreatic endoprostheses can be inserted easily in cases of obstructed pathways or cholangitis and pancreatitis due to tumor obstruction. Argon plasma coagulation can be used to treat oozing tumor hemorrhages or to vaporize tumoral residues after endoscopic snare resection. Endoscopic surveillance is essential after surgical or endoscopic resection of adenomas of the papilla of Vater.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1993

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: stones, stents and sphincterotomy.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is clearly a useful adjunct in the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who have common bile duct stones. Whether endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to traditional open cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration is a question which remains to be answered by prospective, randomized trials. The immense popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy may prohibit such a study in the USA. In expert hands, endoscopic stone extraction is usually successful, so ERCP can be deferred until after cholecystectomy unless there is serious suspicion of a duct stone preoperatively. Actual clinical practice will depend, however, on the skill of the surgeon, the skill of the endoscopist, and the commitment to removing the gallbladder laparoscopically. It would seem prudent for surgeons to continue to direct their energy toward conquering the common bile duct via the laparoscope, and leave ERCP and stone extraction in the realm of the endoscopist who has been extensively trained in this difficult technique. Proficiency at ERCP, sphincterotomy and stone extraction requires considerable training, and the procedure should not be attempted by individuals who have performed fewer than 100 ERCPs and 25 individually supervised sphincterotomies, according to the ASGE Standards of Training, 1992. As experience with video endoscopic surgery increases and technology improves, it will become possible to remove most duct stones at the time of cholecystectomy, thus obviating the need for endoscopic sphincterotomy. In addition, ERCP should be regarded as the treatment of choice for postoperative cystic duct stump leaks. Studies have shown that any type of biliary decompression, i.e. sphincterotomy, stents or nasobiliary catheters, will be successful. The authors recommend that, in the absence of duct stones, stenting or nasobiliary catheters be used as they are less invasive. Bile duct leaks may also be managed endoscopically, but success depends on the individual characteristics of the duct injury. The decision to manage late onset strictures endoscopically should be individualized, and consideration of local endoscopic expertise, operative risk, interval between surgery and stricture, and the patient's wishes should be made.

Bile Ducts↗
PubMed2006

The compactEASIE is a feasible training model for endoscopic novices: a prospective randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective benefit of a training using the compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy-simulator was demonstrated in two prospective educational trials (New York, France). The present study analysed whether endoscopic novices are able to reach a comparable level of endoscopic skills as in the above-described projects. METHODS: Twenty-seven endoscopic novices (medical students, first year residents) were enrolled in this prospective, randomised trial. The compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy-simulator with an upper GI-organ package and blood perfusion system was used as a training tool. Basic evaluation of endoscopic skills was performed after a practical and theoretical course in diagnostic upper GI endoscopy followed by a stratified randomisation according to the rating in endoscopic skills into intensive (n=14) and control group (n=13). The intensive group was trained 12 times every second week over 7 months in 4 endoscopic disciplines (manual skills, injection therapy, haemoclip, band ligation) by skilled endoscopist (three trainees/simulator). Assessment was performed (single steps/overall) using an analogue scale from 1 to 10 (1=worst, 10=optimal performance) by expert tutors. The control group was not trained. Blinded final evaluation of all participants was performed in January 2003. RESULTS: We observed in all techniques applied a significant improvement of endoscopic skills and of the performance time in the intensive group compared to the control group (p<0.001). The comparison with the previous projects showed that the intensively trained novices achieved comparable levels of performance to the GI fellows in the New York and France Project (at least 80% of the median score in three out of four techniques). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic novices acquired notable skills in interventional endoscopy in the simulator by an intensive, periodical training using the compactEASIE.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients.

BACKGROUND: Bile leak is among the most common complications of cholecystectomy. Endoscopic therapy is empiric; a systematic approach to management of bile leak has not been established. METHODS: The severity of bile leak was classified by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography into low grade (leak identified only after intrahepatic opacification) or high grade (leak observed before intrahepatic opacification). Therapy was based on this distinction: biliary sphincterotomy alone for low-grade leaks and stent placement for high-grade leaks. The success of this strategy in consecutive patients treated between 1989 and 1999 was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients (127 women, 80 men; median age 57 years) with bile leak were referred for endoscopic management; 134 had undergone laparoscopic, and 72 had open cholecystectomy. Patients presented at a median of 9 days (range 1-50 days) after surgery. Symptoms included pain (56%), jaundice (16%), fever (11%), and abdominal distension (7%). Persistent percutaneous drainage was present in 48%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography identified the leak site in 204 patients: cystic duct stump, 159 patients (78%); duct of Luschka, 26 (13%); other, 19 (9%). Of 104 patients with low-grade leaks, 75 had sphincterotomy alone; improvement occurred in 68 patients (91%). Subsequent treatment was required in 7 patients (6 stent, 1 surgery). Stents were placed in the remaining 29/104 patients for the following reasons: biliary stricture (11/29); coagulopathy, precluding sphincterotomy (8/29); severe sepsis (3/29); inadequate drainage after prior sphincterotomy (2/29); and unclear reasons (5/29). Of 100 patients with high-grade leaks, 97 had stent placement. Persistent leakage necessitated another stent insertion in 4 patients. Closure of the leak was documented by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in all 97 patients. Three patients with leaks not amenable to endoscopic treatment were referred for surgery. Bile-duct stones were identified in 41 patients (28, low-grade group; 13, high-grade group) and were extracted in all cases. Overall, complications occurred in 3 patients (2 pancreatitis, 1 perforation) and were managed conservatively with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, practical endoscopic classification system for bile leak after cholecystectomy is proposed. This classification has clinical relevance for selection of optimal endoscopic management.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in papillomatosis of the bile ducts: analysis of five cases.

BACKGROUND: Biliary papillomatosis is an uncommon disease, the definitive diagnosis and treatment of which generally require surgery. In the present study, we described the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in five such patients. METHODS: Since 1982, five patients with biliary papillomatosis have been admitted to our unit. All these patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. RESULTS: Endoscopic examination of the ampulla of Vater showed a dilated papillary orifice with mucin discharge in all five patients. Biliary papillomatosis was diagnosed from the following features: multiple filling defects in the lumen of the biliary system in four patients and several supple stenoses in one patient. Histologic examination of biliary specimens taken after endoscopic sphincterotomy showed typical lesions of papillomatosis in the five patients. Palliative endoscopic treatment was performed in three patients. CONCLUSION: This case series reports the typical endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic biopsy findings in biliary papillomatosis. For inoperable patients, endoscopic palliative evacuation of mucus and debris and/or stent placement are of benefit.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Endoscopic therapy in anomalous pancreatobiliary duct junction.

BACKGROUND: Anomalous pancreaticobiliary duct junction is associated with bile duct strictures, pancreatitis, choledochal cysts, and biliary carcinoma. Limited data are available for outcomes of endoscopic therapy. METHODS: Review of 7537 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography from 1988 to 1997 yielded 18 patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary duct junction. Therapeutic responses were tallied by chart review and phone calls. RESULTS: There were 13 women and 5 men, with a mean age of 36 years. Twelve patients had no ductographic evidence of pancreatitis and 6 had chronic pancreatitis. Seven had choledochal cysts. Fifteen patients (83%) underwent endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, two of whom underwent repeat endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for recurrence of symptoms. The other therapies included stent placement for benign biliary strictures in 5 patients, lithotripsy of pancreatic stones in 1 patient, and choledochal cyst removal in 4 patients. Three cases with malignant biliary strictures are excluded from endoscopic outcome studies. The 12 patients with pancreatitis had a mean of 2.0 episodes per year before any treatment. After endoscopic therapy 7 patients had no further episodes of pancreatitis, whereas 5 patients had further episodes, with a mean of one additional attack per year, over 3 years mean follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary duct junction have complex pathology associated with strictures, choledochal cysts, pancreatitis, and malignancies. Endoscopic therapy appeared to benefit 13 of 15 patients without malignant disease with elimination of or decreased frequency of pancreatitis. Endoscopic therapy appears to be a logical first step in the management of most symptomatic patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary duct junction.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is becoming more popular, although endoscopic sphincterotomy remains the usual treatment for bile duct stones. However, loss of the biliary sphincter causes permanent duodenobiliary reflux, and recurrent stone disease and biliary neoplasia may be a consequence. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to compare laparoscopic exploration with endoscopic sphincterotomy. A text word search of the Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases, and a manual search of the citations from these references, was used. RESULTS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with a median (range) mortality rate of 1 (0-6) per cent, compared with 1 (0-5) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. The median (range) rate of pancreatitis following endoscopic sphincterotomy is 3 (1-19) per cent; this is a rare complication after laparoscopic duct exploration. The combined morbidity rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy is 13 (3-16) per cent, which is greater than 8 (2-17) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Randomized trials are few and contain relatively small numbers of patients. They show little overall difference in rates of duct clearance, but a higher mortality rate and number of hospital admissions are noted for endoscopic sphincterotomy compared with laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with recurrent stone formation (up to 16 per cent) with associated cholangitis. It is also associated with bacterobilia and chronic mucosal inflammation. The late development of bile duct cancer has been reported in up to 2 per cent of patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct may be a better way of removing stones than endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. :

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy can benefit patients with suspected biliary pancreatitis, although there are procedure-related complications. EUS can be used to select patients for endoscopic sphincterotomy. The results of this strategy were assessed. METHODS: Information on patients referred for EUS were recorded in a database. One hundred twenty-three patients with suspected biliary pancreatitis (57 men, 66 women; median age 55 years) were included and followed. All underwent EUS followed by endoscopic sphincterotomy during the same procedure if choledocholithiasis was identified. Outcomes were studied in relation to the initial severity of biliary pancreatitis (Ranson and Balthazar scores), presence of stones, and time span between onset of biliary pancreatitis and EUS plus endoscopic sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (28%) had a Ranson score greater than 3 on admission and 38 (31%) were Balthazar D-E. The median time from admission to EUS was 3 days. EUS imaging of the bile duct was complete in all but 3 patients. Thirty-three patients (27%) had choledocholithiasis on EUS and underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy. Stones were more frequent in patients with jaundice (p < 0.005) and when EUS was performed less than 3 days after admission (p < 0.05). One hundred patients (81%) recovered without complication. Two patients (1.6%) died, 1 had recurrent BP develop, 6 (5%) had further biliary symptoms, and 16 (13%) had complications of pancreatitis develop (9 pseudocysts). There were 3 mild endoscopic sphincterotomy-related complications (complication rate 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this series in which endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed selectively depending on the endosonographic presence or absence of ductal stones early in the course of the pancreatitis, and not according to its predicted severity, mortality and complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy were low and unrelated to the predicted severity of biliary pancreatitis or the presence of choledocholithiasis. Controlled trials are needed to confirm the superiority of this strategy compared with ERCP alone for the management of biliary pancreatitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Endoscopic management of biliary fistulas complicating liver transplantation and other hepatobiliary operations.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic management of biliary fistulas complicating liver transplantation and other hepatobiliary operations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical therapy has been the traditional approach to large or unresolving biliary fistulas complicating liver transplantation. Although endoscopic management is rapidly becoming an acceptable alternative to surgery for the treatment of biliary fistulas complicating non-liver transplant hepatobiliary operations, it has received limited attention in the liver transplant setting. METHODS: During a 15-month period, 146 adults underwent liver transplantation with biliary reconstruction by end-to-end choledochocholedochostomy over a T-tube. Inadvertent T-tube migration or intentional T-tube removal resulted in bile peritonitis in 18 patients. The patients were treated with a nasobiliary tube (n = 13), internal stent plus endoscopic sphincterotomy (n = 3), or internal stent alone (n = 2). Thirteen patients had a biliary fistula after other hepatobiliary operations and underwent endoscopic therapy during a similar period. All 13 had an endoscopic sphincterotomy with removal of obstructing stones when present (n = 6). Twelve patients also had stents placed. All patients were prospectively followed after hospital discharge and assessed for recurrent symptoms suggestive of biliary tract disease and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) identified a biliary fistula at the T-tube insertion site into the bile duct in all 18 liver transplant patients. Seventeen patients had resolution of their symptoms within 12 hours of therapy. The fistula sealed in 94.4%. In the other hepatobiliary operation group, ERCP demonstrated contrast extravasation from the biliary tree in 12 of 13. The biliary fistula closure rate was 92.3%. The endoscopic complication rate for the two groups was 3.2%. During a mean follow-up of 9 months, recurrent biliary tract complications occurred in 11.1% of the liver transplant group and 0% in the other hepatobiliary operation group (p > 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the application of endoscopic management of biliary fistulas complicating orthotopic liver transplantation and other hepatobiliary operations. This approach was relatively safe and obviated the need for surgical intervention.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Endoscopic manometry of the sphincter of Oddi: its usefulness for the diagnosis and treatment of benign papillary stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic manometry is considered useful to identify dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) and to predict in which patients good results can be expected after endoscopic sphincterotomy, but this has not been definitively demonstrated. METHODS: Endoscopic manometry of the SO was used in a group of 30 patients with benign papillary stenosis (BPS), in comparison with 30 control subjects. During endoscopic manometry an intravenous bolus of cholecystokinin octapeptide was given to 12 patients and to 10 controls. In 24 BPS patients endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between controls and patients with regard to median values of SO basal (20 and 21.5 mmHg) and peak pressure (123 and 126 mmHg), wave amplitude (100 mmHg), frequency (4 waves/min), and propagation of the common bile duct/duodenum gradient (12.5 and 12.1 mmHg). In two BPS patients a paradoxic response to CCK-OP was observed. Endoscopic sphincterotomy, performed in 24 BPS patients (17 with SO basal pressure less than 40 mmHg and 7 with more than 40 mmHg), gave good results in 23, without any complication. No differences were observed in the results of the endoscopic sphincterotomy among patients with basal pressure more than 40 mmHg and those with less than 40 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study, manometric data do not seem helpful for diagnosis of BPS or to discriminate which patients can be treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed1999

[Endoscopic therapy of ischemia-type biliary lesions in patients following orthotopic liver transplantation].

Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) mainly induce stenoses in liver transplants causing cholestasis thus endangering the allograft. ERC enables distinction of ITBL from other differential diagnosis. From 1988 to 1998, 1,026 liver transplantations had been carried out at our clinic. 2.4% (25 out of 1,026) of liver transplanted patients were afflicted from ITBL. 60% (15 out of 25) of patients were endoscopically treated by means of sphincterotomy and balloon dilation. Furthermore, some patients needed extraction of calculi (n = 3), bile duct sequester (n = 6) or stenting (n = 4), respectively. Three patients suffered from ITBL type 1 (= only extrahepatic lesions) and five other patients were afflicted from ITBL type 2 (= circumscript intrahepatic lesions). 90% of those patients revealed long-term benefit from endoscopic therapy (follow-up to seven years). Another 15 patients elicited ITBL type 3 (= multiple intra- and extrahepatic lesions). Therefrom, nine patients had to be retransplanted directly while eight others were assigned to endoscopic treatment. Follow-up investigations revealed that retransplantation could be avoided in 50% of ITBL patients by means of endoscopic therapy for at least three years. In contrast, only 27% of ITBL patients could survive for more than three years without endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic success depends on localization and severity of ITBL complications in the biliary tract of the liver allograft. Therefore, benefit of endoscopic therapy depends on proper diagnosis as early as possible guiding further therapeutic strategy. Conclusively, endoscopic success enables maintenance of liver function in ITBL afflicted liver grafts and avoids or at least, delays retransplantation.

Bile Ducts↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dominant stricture of an extrahepatic bile duct is responsible for symptoms and an exacerbation of cholestasis in 15-20% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment in this selected patient group. METHODS: Retrospectively, we evaluated 16 patients who were treated endoscopically due to elevation of serum biochemical liver tests and symptoms which were attributable to dominant bile duct strictures during the period 1990 to 2003. Symptoms and biochemical liver tests were compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent a total of 58 therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCP). Sixteen endoscopic sphincterotomies, 15 balloon dilatations, 6 bougie dilatations, 3 stone/sludge extractions and 8 stentings were performed. Endoscopic therapy was technically successful in all patients (100%). Biochemical liver tests were significantly improved when compared with pretreatment values (p<0.001). Patients have been followed-up without stents except for the patients who had cholangiocarcinoma and cirrhosis at the beginning. Procedure-related early complications occurred in 8.6% of therapeutic endoscopic biliary procedures. There was no mortality due to endoscopic treatment. Two patients whose stents were changed every two to three months had cholangitis due to stenting during 13 stent periods. Four patients whose stents were changed in seven to 10 days developed suppurative cholangitis (total 6 stent periods). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy of symptomatic dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis is safe and effective. The cholangitis seen in long-term stenting seems to be solved by short-term stenting.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Treatment outcome after endoscopic papillectomy of tumors of the major duodenal papilla].

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic papillectomy is reported to be relatively safe and reliable for complete resection of benign tumors of the major duodenal papilla. We evaluated methods and treatment outcome of the patients who have undergone endoscopic papillectomy. METHODS: Medical records of 22 consecutive patients with tumor of the major duodenal papilla (10 women, 12 men; mean age 55.8+/-2.8 yrs) who have undergone endoscopic papillectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Endoscopic papillectomy was defined the successful when complete excision of the tumor was achieved. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 8.4+/-2.4 months (range 1-43 months). Endoscopic papillectomy was successful in 16 patients (72.7%), but incomplete resection occurred in 6 patients. Only one patient showed recurrence. Histopathologic evaluation after endoscopic papillectomy revealed adenoma (n=11, 50%), high-grade dysplasia (n=3, 13.6%), adenocarcinoma (n=2, 9.1%), carcinoid (n=1), chronic inflammation (n=3, 13.6%), papillary adenomatous hyperplasia (n=1), and cavernous lymphangioma (n=1). The mean size of the resected lesions was 10.3+/-1.2 mm (range 2-20 mm). There was no factor which could predict the endoscopic success statistically. A pancreatic duct stent was placed in 11 patients (50.0%) and was removed after 3 to 39 days. There were 8 (36.8%) procedure-related complications: bleeding (n=4), papillary stenosis (n=1), perforation (n=1), cholangitis (n=1), and asymptomatic liver function abnormality (n=1). There was no pancreatitis or mortality. All the complications resolved with conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic papillectomy in selected patients seemed to be highly successful and safe. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the long-term efficacy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Device for measuring the forces exerted on the shaft of an endoscope during colonoscopy.

Colonoscopy involves advancing a flexible endoscope into and along the entire length of the colon. The procedure can be painful and carries the risk of perforating the organ, yet very little is known of the forces involved. A device to measure the forces exerted on the endoscope during colonoscopy is described. The device features a handle designed in the shape of a hinged split cylinder that locks around the endoscope, gripping it tightly. The handle has two parts, an inner part that grips the endoscope, and an outer part that is gripped by the endoscopist. The two parts are joined together by members that transmit the forces through to the endoscope. One of the members incorporates strain gauges that measure the torque applied to the endoscope, as well as the push and pull forces. The handle can easily be unlocked and moved along the endoscope as the colonoscopy proceeds. The device is used to measure the forces applied to the endoscope during 11 routine colonoscopies, and summary results are presented. These are believed to be the first accurate measurements of the forces exerted during colonoscopy.

Colonoscopes↗
PubMed2000

[Endoscopically controlled surgery with the micro-drill and intubation of the lacrimal ducts].

PURPOSE: Operative procedures to manage lacrimal outflow obstruction were made traditionally without endoscopic assistance. For dacryoendoscopy we previously used a 0.5-mm endoscope with a special wash cannula. We now use the microendoscope Vitroptic T for dacryoendoscopy and for endoscopically controlled surgery with a microdrill. METHODS: In an attempt to perform microinvasive lacrimal surgery we use a 1.1-mm endoscope (Vitroptik T) with a wash cannula, a channel for the microoptic and a channel for a microdrill. We report on our initial experiences and on the results of eight patients with stenosis of the lacrimal outflow system who were treated with an endoscopic microdrill and silicone tubing. One patient had lacrimal stenosis after external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), and seven patients showed punctual stenosis in the nasolacrimal duct. RESULTS: Using the dacryoendoscope (Vitroptic T) we were able to visualize pathologic changes of the lacrimal outflow system. Intraoperative situations during dacryoendoscopy are demonstrated. The Vitroptic T allows dacryoendoscopy and endoscopically controlled surgery of the lacrimal drainage system. Three months after surgery in six patients (75%) the lacrimal outflow system was patent with the silicone tube in place, and these patients had no epiphora. The patient with re-stenosis after external DCR showed patency. CONCLUSIONS: Dacryoendoscopy and endoscopic controlled surgery of the lacrimal drainage system enables atraumatic and minimally invasive surgery. The Vitroptik T with the microdrill allows endoscopically controlled microsurgery. Possible indications for the microdrill are punctual stenosis and re-stenosis after external DCR.

Dacryocystorhinostomy↗
PubMed2004

A robotic wide-angle view endoscope using wedge prisms.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to develop a new type of robotic wide-angle view endoscope that does not require rotation or bending of the endoscope to move the field of view. This endoscope allows the surgeon to make extensive observations in a small space. It is safe because it avoids the possibility of hitting organs accidentally. METHODS: The system consists of an endoscope with a zoom facility and two wedge prisms at the tip. Each prism is set on its own sleeve at the end of the endoscope, and both prisms rotate independently about the axis of the endoscope. RESULTS: In the in vivo experiment, the high quality of the image was confirmed, and almost whole liver could be observed without the observer moving the endoscope itself. CONCLUSIONS: This system provides safe robotic endoscopic surgery because of the high quality of the image. It has great significance for future clinical use.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Current GI endoscope disinfection and QA practices.

High-level disinfection (HLD) of GI endoscopes is readily achieved when published guidelines are observed. Contamination is linked to breakdowns in accepted procedure. However, there is no recognized method of verifying adequacy of endoscope reprocessing in routine practice and no data regarding current quality assurance (QA) practice. Prior reports have demonstrated a wide variation in routine clinical practice of GI endoscopy HLD. The goal of this study was to determine current practice at regional endoscopy centers with regard to endoscope cleaning and HLD, maintenance, and QA practice. An anonymous multiple-choice questionnaire was mailed to 367 SGNA members in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, Maryland, and District of Columbia and completed by 230 (63%). The majority of responders were hospital-based and 59% of the units performed over 3000 procedures per year. After use the endoscope was hand-carried or transported in a dry container (97%) to a separate cleaning room (85%) for HLD by technicians (40%). Wide variations existed in manual step procedures including use of disposable (50%) brushes and number of times channel brushed: once (21%), twice (35%), or three to five times (37%). Soaking duration in disinfectant (70% gluteraldehyde) was for <10 min (8%), 10-20 min (35%), 20-30 min (38%), 30-40 min (7%), and >40 min (3%). Sixty-seven percent had an active unit infection control (IC) service and 98% had a QA program. Monitoring of cleaning effectiveness was by visual inspection (50%) and culturing endoscopes (17%). Culture was done weekly (1%) and <biannually (6.5%) and performed by swabing the endoscope end (5%) or rinsing the biopsy channel (8%). If culture positive, most would remove the instrument from clinical use and reevaluate the protocol and personnel for technique lapses. Two respondents were aware of a procedure-related infection. Wide practice variations were noted in manual cleaning and in soaking time during automated HLD in this community. Fewer variations were noted in cleaning personnel and training, location and methods of cleaning, and presence of IC services and QA programs. Endoscope culturing was infrequently done and positive cultures were rare. While most units claim to have ongoing QA programs, few use objective criteria to monitor effective disinfection or lapses in technique. Iatrogenic infection is uncommonly recognized following GI endoscope procedures.

Disinfectants↗
PubMed2006

A prospective study of the efficacy of routine decontamination for gastrointestinal endoscopes and the risk factors for failure.

BACKGROUND: Patient-ready endoscopes were monitored over an 80-week period to determine the efficacy of decontamination procedures in a busy endoscopy center. Decontamination failure was related to patient and procedural parameters. METHODS: Samples from patient-ready endoscopes were cultured aerobically and anaerobically and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV. PCR to detect coliforms from 109 culture negative washes was used as a surrogate marker for biofilm in endoscopes. PCR was used to detect the presence of Helicobactor pylori in endoscopes used on infected patients. Procedural information such as biopsy retrieval, endoscope number, diagnosis, attending personnel, and decontamination system procedures was collected. RESULTS: Gastroscopes (n = 1,376) and colonoscopes (n = 987) were equally contaminated (1.8% vs 1.9%, respectively) with low numbers of organisms commonly isolated from the nasopharynx and/or feces. Only 1 wash contained viral nucleic acid (HCV). There was a significant correlation (P < .001) between the number of times a patient-ready endoscope was contaminated and its frequency of use. Colonoscopes used on patients with gastrointestinal disease were significantly more likely to remain contaminated through the decontamination process (P < .05). All other patient, staff, and decontamination system parameters remained not statistically significant. Coliform DNA was detected in 40% of culture-negative washes collected from patient-ready endoscopes, suggesting the presence of biofilm. No H pylori DNA was detected. CONCLUSION: Recommended decontamination procedures do not entirely eliminate persistence of low numbers of organisms on a few endoscopes, but this is unlikely to cause serious consequences in patients. Bacterial biofilm is difficult to remove and may explain this low-level persistence.

Adolescent↗