SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Blunt trauma to the head and neck is a rare cause of cervical esophageal perforation. We report a cervical esophageal perforation caused by compression by a shoulder-harness seatbelt during a high-speed motor vehicle crash. We are not aware of a similar case in the trauma literature.
Instrumental perforation of the pharynx with distal obstruction is a complex problem. A fistula is not likely to close in the presence of distal obstruction. The stenotic lesion needs to be treated in addition to the perforation. We report a 83-year-old female patient who underwent three-stage total esophagectomy and right cervical pharyngo-gastric anastomosis for iatrogenic pharyngeal perforation and distal esophageal malignancy. The radical surgical approach has the advantage of treating the immediate crisis due to perforation and also treating the stricture for which the esophagoscopy was originally performed.
The changes seen on contrast esophagrams after endoscopic pneumatic balloon dilation for the treatment of achalasia are described and illustrated. Sixteen patients had esophagrams within 24 hr after dilation and follow-up esophagrams were obtained 6-24 months later. The radiographic features evaluated in the early postdilation period included detection of esophageal perforation, diameter of the esophagogastric channel, proximal esophageal dilatation, mucosal integrity, and emptying dynamics of the esophagus. Fourteen patients (88%) had immediate symptomatic improvement of dysphagia. The mean increase in diameter of the esophagogastric channel was 6.5 mm (range, 4.8-9 mm) relative to a pretreatment esophagram. Emptying dynamics of the esophagus improved significantly in 12 patients (75%). One patient developed esophageal perforation requiring surgery. On the follow-up esophagrams obtained 6-24 months later, the evaluation was for sustained dilatation of esophagogastric channel, decrease in esophageal dilatation, and improved emptying dynamics of the esophagus. The effective esophagogastric channel diameter of 8-10 mm correlated well with improved clinical response in 88% of the patients.
Eleven patients suffered esophageal perforations from external trauma. This series includes the first report of esophageal perforation that resulted from a cervical flexion-hyperextension injury. The other ten patient had penetrating trauma. Early signs were subtle. Small amounts of mediastinal and cervical air tended to be overlooked or erroneously attributed to other causes, such as associated pneumothorax. Once suspected, the possibility of esophageal disruption was not always pursued with optimum vigor. There was undue reliance on contrast media radiography. There were two patients with falsely normal esophagograms. All patients healed well when treated witreatment of choice.
Esophageal foreign body remains a common clinical problem. Esophageal perforation is an uncommon associated condition which almost affects invariably the esophagus. A rare case of cervical esophageal perforation secondary to an unexpected migration of a swallowed foreign body is presented. Methods of treatment are discussed and the literature is reviewed.
A 79-year-old man with peptic stricture of the esophagus was treated by endoscopic aid dilatation using Eder-Peustow dilator. Esophageal perforation was suspected after the second dilatation and conservative treatment was initiated with full recovery. The patient developed Barrett's esophagus despite continuous treatment with ranitidine and metoclopramide. The role of medical treatment in esophageal perforation due to instrumentation was emphasized. Peptic stricture of esophagus is probably not common in our community. The conventional treatment of esophagitis with ranitidine and metoclopramide is not adequate in preventing the occurrence of Barrett's esophagus.
BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment for achalasia permanently eliminates the dysfunctional lower esophageal sphincter, relieving dysphagia and regurgitation; prevents gastroesophageal reflux; and has an acceptable morbidity rate. Controversy exists concerning whether the thoracoscopic Heller Myotomy (THM) or laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) technique is the best approach to a modified Heller myotomy for achalasia. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective comparison of the patient characteristics, operative results, postoperative symptoms, and the learning curves for the procedures of 24 patients undergoing THM and 63 patients undergoing LHM between 1991 and 1998. RESULTS: Preoperative patient variables in each group revealed similar distributions for age, gender, and prevalence of previous pneumatic dilation. Mean operating room (OR) times were 4.3 hours (range 2.9 to 5.6 hours) for THM and 3.0 hours (range 1.5 to 6.5 hours) for LHM (p = 0.01). Three esophageal perforations occurred in the THM group and two in the LHM group. Conversion to an open procedure took place in five THM operations (21%) and one LHM operation (2%) (p = 0.005). There were no postoperative esophageal leaks. Mean postoperative length of stay (LOS) for THM was 6.1 days (range 1 to 17 days) and for LHM was 4.0 days (range 1 to 12 days) (p = 0.03). Learning-curve analysis of the first 24 LHM patients compared with the most recent 24 revealed greater OR time in the first 24 mean 3.6 hours, (range 2.0 to 6.5 hours) versus mean 2.3 hours, (range 1.5 to 3.7 hours; p = 0.01), and greater LOS mean 5.5 days, (range 3 to 12 days) versus mean 3.1 days, (range 1 to 8 days; p < 0.01). One esophageal perforation occurred in each subgroup. A similar analysis in the first 12 THM patients compared with the most recent 12 revealed no significant improvement in OR times or LOS. Three esophageal perforations occurred in the latter subgroup only. All patients had preoperative daily dysphagia to solids. Followup data for LHM (n = 49) (median 17 months, range 1 to 39 months) and THM (n = 15) (median 42 months, range 1 to 69 months) revealed no or minimal dysphagia in 90% (44 of 49) after LHM and 31% (4 of 13) after THM (p < 0.01). No or minimal heartburn was present in 89% (41 of 46) after LHM and 67% (8 of 12) after THM (p < 0.05). Regurgitation was absent or minimal in 94% (46 of 49) after LHM and 86% (12 of 14) after THM (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: LHM was associated with decreased OR time, decreased rate of conversion to an open procedure, and shorter LOS compared with THM. LHM was superior to THM in relieving dysphagia and preventing heartburn. LHM may be the preferred surgical treatment of achalasia in some patients.
Perforation of the cervical esophagus is a serious circumstance. Mediastinitis secondary to esophageal perforations is associated with high mortality. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment for this condition. We present a case of conservative treatment in an 82-year-old woman with cervical esophagus rupture associated with mediastinal abscess and bilateral pleural effusion resulting from dilatation of a malignant esophageal stricture. Conservative treatment consisted on broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy, antireflux measures and gastrostomy was satisfactory. Treatment of the esophageal perforation should be individualized to the circumstances of each patient. Advances in antibiotic and nutritional therapy, early institution of treatment and observance of the indications, made possible a more frequent use of a conservative therapeutic approach.
From June 1985 to May 1998, 20 patients have been treated in our hospital by esophageal dilatations due to serious esophageal caustic stenosis. A retrospective analysis of these 20 patients was performed, evaluating age, sex, causative agent, number and time of dilatations, iatrogenic esophageal perforations, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and psychological and social consequences. Follow-up has ranged from 1.5 to 14.5 years (mean = 8.07 years). The mean age at the time of accidental swallow was 42.2 months. The causative agent was dishwashing detergent in 11 patients and caustic soda in 9 patients. The mean of dilatations needed was 19.1 and the average duration of dilatations was 24.7 months. Seven patients had esophageal perforation during dilatation and none of them required surgical treatment. All patients had improvement of swallowing and an easier esophageal dilatation afterwards. Oral contrast studies demonstrated distortion of the esophago-gastric junction in the majority of patients. Ten patients were screened for GER with 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in the first year postburn and it was pathological in 5. Antireflux surgery was carried out in 4 patients with a conspicuous improvement following surgery. Dilatations proved successful in 16 patients in less than two years, and in more than two years in 3 patients. The authors conclude that the majority of children with esophageal caustic stenosis can be managed successfully by esophageal dilatations, even with dilatation periods longer than two years or when an esophageal perforation occur during the procedure. The paramount importance of early diagnosis and treatment of GER is stressed.
Based on the symptoms of oesophageal wall perforation and its sequelae the significance of immediate examination and clinical observation are emphasised. This disease is difficult to diagnose by modern technology in the early stages. Advice is given on the main diagnostic symptoms and the appropriate sequence of examination.
The thoracic perioperative specialty team members at Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Va, designed guidelines to improve the management of patients with esophageal perforations. They performed a retrospective analysis of 41 patients who were diagnosed with thoracic esophageal perforations from Sept 1, 1979, through Sept 1, 1996. The review affirmed their philosophy of aggressive, surgical intervention for perforations, particularly for patients diagnosed early (i.e., within 24 hours). The process of examining and communicating the results among OR nurses, anesthesia care providers, and surgeons resulted in the increased efficiency and appropriateness with which patients were incorporated into the hospital's surgical and medical treatment groups.
From January 1985 through July 1987, adult patients accepted for liver transplantation with large esophageal varices were enrolled in a study evaluating the use of prophylactic vs emergency sclerotherapy. Six hundred forty-eight subjects received prophylactic sclerotherapy, and 172 received emergent sclerotherapy. Esophageal stricture formation was increased 12.9-fold (P < 0.001), esophageal perforation 6.4-fold (P < 0.005), and postsclerotherapy bleeding esophageal ulcers 3.7-fold (P < 0.001) in those receiving emergency sclerotherapy as opposed to prophylactic sclerotherapy. These differences were even greater if the number of sclerotherapy sessions rather than the number of patients was used as the denominator for the comparisons. In total, 19.6% of emergency sclerotherapy cases were associated with an untoward outcome of sclerotherapy; only 1.9% of cases receiving prophylactic sclerotherapy experienced an untoward outcome (P < 0.001). These data demonstrate that emergency sclerotherapy is associated with a greater prevalence of complications and support earlier studies that show that sclerotherapy prevents variceal bleeding over the short term. The data also suggest that when applied to patients with large varices awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation, it enhances the chance of a patient surviving to be transplanted by preventing a variceal bleed and the spiral of liver failure and death that frequently follows an episode of acute variceal bleeding.
Between 1970 and 1983, 46 patients were hospitalized in the Vanderbilt University Medical Center and the Metropolitan Nashville General Hospital for treatment of achalasia. All patients had been symptomatic for at least two years. Efforts were made initially to manage most of these patients (40) with periodic esophageal dilatation. This was successful in only six cases (15%). In four instances (10%), patients had esophageal perforation. Thirty patients have had esophagomyotomy (Heller procedure), and 14 of these had an associated antireflux procedure. Three had proximal gastric vagotomy for associated duodenal ulcer disease. Twenty-seven (90%) have had a good result, three died postoperatively, and two elderly patients had postoperative myocardial infarction. The other patient had sepsis after repair of a perforated esophagus. While periodic esophageal dilatation is necessary in patients who may not tolerate an operative procedure, most patients with achalasia are best treated with Heller esophagomyotomy.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the complications associated with the laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children. METHODS: From March 1992 to March 1998, we used the laparoscopic approach to treat 289 children affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease. The patients' ages ranged between 4 months and 17 years (median, 4.3 years), and their body weight ranged between 5 and 52 kg. In 148 children (51.3%), we adopted a Nissen-Rossetti procedure and in 141 (48.7%) a Toupet technique. RESULTS: The duration of surgery ranged between 40 and 180 min (median, 70). There were no deaths and no anesthesiological complications in our series. We recorded 15 (5.1%) intraoperative complications: six pleural perforations, four lesions of the posterior vagus nerve, two esophageal perforations, two gastric perforations, and one pericardiac perforation. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in only four cases (1.3%). We recorded 10 (3.4%) postoperative complications: one peritonitis due to an esophageal perforation not detected during the intervention that required a reoperation, five cases of herniation of the epiploon through a trocar orifice, three cases of dysphagia that disappeared spontaneously after a few months, and one case of delayed gastric emptying that subsequently required a pyloroplasty. We had six recurrences of GERD (2.1%). In two cases, a new fundoplication was performed using the laparoscopic approach; in the other four, the GERD was controlled with medical therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results show that laparoscopic fundoplication is an adequate treatment for children with GERD that has a low rate of complications. When severe complications do occur, they can be treated effectively via the laparoscopic approach.
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has become the standard treatment option for achalasia. The incidence of esophageal perforation reported is about 5%-10%. Robotically assisted Heller myotomy (RAHM) is emerging as a safe alternative to LHM. Data comparing the two approaches are scant. The aim of this study was to compare RAHM with LHM in terms of efficacy and safety for treatment of achalasia. A total of 121 patients underwent surgical treatment of achalasia at three institutions. A retrospective review of prospectively collected perioperative data was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (RAHM), 59 patients, and group B (LHM), 62 patients. All the operations were completed using minimally invasive techniques. There were 63 women and 58 men, with a mean age of 45 +/- 19 years (14-82 years). Fifty-one percent of patients in group A and 95% of patients in group B reported weight loss. Duration of symptoms was equal for both groups. Dysphagia was the main complaint in both groups (P = NS). There was no difference in preoperative endoscopic treatment in both groups (44% versus 27%, P = NS). Operative time was significantly shorter for LHM in the first half of the experience (141 +/- 49 versus 122 +/- 44 minutes, P < .05). However, in the last 30 cases there was no difference in operative time between the groups (P = NS). Intraoperative complications (esophageal perforation) were more frequent in group B (16% versus 0%). The incidence of postoperative heartburn did not differ by group. There were no deaths. At 18 and 22 months, 92% and 90% of patients had relief of their dysphagia. This study suggests that RAHM is safer than LHM, because it decreases the incidence of esophageal perforation to 0%, even in patients who had previous treatment. At short-term follow-up, relief of dysphagia was equally achieved in both groups
The medical records and plain films of the chest and neck of 24 patients with esophageal perforation that had occurred either spontaneously or as a complication of instrumentation were reviewed. Plain films provide useful guidelines as to cause and location of perforation, and were found to be valuable in performing the subsequent confirmatory esophagram. Perforation of the distal esophagus usually results in pleural effusion or hydropneumothorax on the left, while perforation of the midesophagus tends to produce pleural effusion or hydropneumothorax on the right. Spontaneous perforation (Boerhaave syndrome) usually occurs in the distal esophagus, with resultant hydropneumothorax on the left. The plain films were unremarkable in about 12% of patients with esophageal perforation.
Abnormalities of the esophagus are common, and complications associated with these disorders and diseases can involve the mediastinum, tracheobronchial tree, and lungs. The most common complications include mediastinitis secondary to esophageal perforation or postoperative anastomotic leak, or both; empyema due to fistula formation; and aspiration pneumonia. The authors reviewed the radiologic appearances of those and other common thoracic complications associated with esophageal disorders to facilitate early detection, diagnosis, and management. Computed tomographic (CT) findings of acute mediastinitis secondary to esophageal perforation may include esophageal thickening, extraluminal gas, pleural effusion, single or multiple abscesses, and extraluminal contrast medium. The radiologic manifestations of pneumonia secondary to tracheoesophageal fistula are variable, depending on the spread and severity of the aspiration. The most common radiographic pattern is that of bronchopneumonia with scattered air-space opacities. CT has been regarded as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of suspected esophagopleural fistula, because the site of communication between the pleural space and the esophagus can often be seen. An awareness of the radiologic manifestations of these complications is thus required to facilitate early diagnosis.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was undertaken which evaluated the medical records and imaging studies of a subset of patients managed by the spine service at Jackson Memorial Hospital who were diagnosed with an esophageal perforation in the setting of spinal surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap in the repair of esophageal perforation in the setting of anterior cervical spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The management of an esophageal fistula in the setting of spine surgery is challenging and starts with a prompt and accurate diagnosis. In addition to broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, several methods have been described to repair the fistula, which range from enteral tube feeding, direct repair, and/or repair with a local or free muscle flap. METHODS: The review encompassed medical records, discharge summaries, operative reports, and imaging studies. Data were gathered with specific attention to demographics, primary pathology, mechanism of esophageal injury, method of spinal stabilization, method of esophageal repair, and time to initiation of oral intake. Follow-up interviews were conducted either in-person or by telephone. RESULTS: Six patients were treated over the study period. There were 3 men and 3 women. The mean age was 52.8 years. Primary pathologies were penetrating trauma, blunt trauma (2 cases), degenerative disease (2 cases), and tumor. Mechanisms of esophageal injury were penetrating trauma, acute iatrogenic, chronic iatrogenic (3 cases), and intubation trauma. The time to diagnosis ranged from immediate to 10 months. The method of spinal stabilization was anterior autograft followed by posterior instrumentation in 4 of 6 patients. The method of esophageal repair was an inferiorly based sternocleidomastoid (SCM) flap in 4 cases, primary repair in 1 case, and esophageal diversion alone in 1 case. The time to oral intake averaged 59.2 days (range, 23-113 days) in those with a SCM flap versus 153.5 days (range, 119-188 days) in those treated without a flap. CONCLUSION: The use of an SCM flap for the repair of esophageal injury, in the setting of anterior cervical spine surgery, is a safe and effective tool. An SCM flap appeared to improve the time in initiating oral intake without any significant morbidity.