Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Device Approval”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources

Billing Medicare for investigational devices: what's OK, what's not.

In 1993-1994, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an investigation of allegations that numerous hospitals had fraudulently billed the Medicare program for investigational cardiac devices. OIG found evidence of fraud related to these devices as well as to certain investigational procedures. Partly as a result of this probe, Senate hearings were held in 1996 to ascertain whether fraud and abuse in Medicare billing was a widespread problem. Investigational devices and procedures received particular attention during these proceedings. Hospitals involved in the 1993-1994 OIG investigation maintained that the Federal government previously sanctioned billing for the use of some investigational or experimental devices, that the devices and procedures in question had already been proven to be safe and effective, and that the devices or procedures resulted in better patient care or shorter lengths of stay. For these and other reasons, the hospitals contended, billing Medicare for these devices was appropriate. Although HCFA has allowed the Medicare program to pay for the use of some investigational devices and procedures since November 1995, Federal fraud and abuse investigators continue to scrutinize the billing practices of hospitals engaged in clinical trials. Financial managers in healthcare organizations that use investigational devices--even those not engaged in clinical trials--need to carefully review their organizations' compliance with Medicare billing requirements.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

The impact of regulation.

The medical device industry in the United States is facing a number of challenges, for example, work on Food and Drug Administration reform and a global move towards European-style regulation and harmonization. This article examines those challenges and their effect on the industry and on patients.

Device Approval↗

Medical devices; current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) final fule; quality system regulation--FDA. Final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is revising the current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements for medical devices and incorporating them into a quality system regulation. The quality system regulation includes requirements related to the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, designing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, storing, installing, and servicing of medical devices intended for human use. This action is necessary to add preproduction design controls and to achieve consistency with quality system requirements worldwide. This regulation sets forth the framework for device manufacturers to follow and gives them greater flexibility in achieving quality requirements.

Device Approval↗

Patient safety and efficacy as measured by clinical trials and regulatory policy.

Virtual Reality and other technological innovations in medicine provide new challenges to the regulatory framework of the premarket review process for medical devices. By reinventing the government-academia-industry partnership, clinical trial data necessary for a medical device to enter the market can be more efficiently obtained.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Achieving systematic compliance with the Medical Device Directive.

This article outlines key issues that will aid successful compliance with the requirements of the Medical Device Directive through ISO 9000/EN 46000. A well-constructed quality system that complies with these standards will also act as a good basis for ensuring compliance with many other global regulatory requirements.

Device Approval↗