Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Citrobacter”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources

[Citrobacter].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Carboxy-Lyases↗

Biochemical identification of citrobacteria in the clinical laboratory.

We biochemically identified 235 Citrobacter strains to the species level on the basis of the recently proposed taxonomic changes of Brenner et al. (D. J. Brenner, P. A. D. Grimont, A. G. Steigerwalt, G. R. Fanning, E. Ageron, and C. F. Riddle, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:645-658, 1993). Citrobacter isolates were initially identified as C. koseri or as members of the C. freundii complex or C. amalonaticus group on the basis of indole production, formation of H2S, malonate utilization, and acid production from D-arabitol and adonitol. On the basis of the results of these tests, 68% of the Citrobacter strains were identified as members of the C. freundii complex, 25% were C. koseri, and 8% were members of the C. amalonaticus group. By using a 15-test system recently proposed by Brenner et al. (D. J. Brenner, P. A. D. Grimont, A. G. Steigerwalt, G. R. Fanning, E. Ageron, and C. F. Riddle, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:645-658, 1993) to help identify new species in the C. freundii complex and C. amalonaticus group, 81% of the C. freundii complex strains and 100% of the C. amalonaticus strains could be definitively assigned to one of the previously established or recently designated species or hybridization groups of the genus Citrobacter. Within the C. freundii complex, C. freundii predominated overall (37%), followed by C. youngae (24%), C. braakii (13%), and C. werkmanii (6%). Only one strain each of C. sedlakii and Citrobacter DNA group 11 was identified in this study. Among C. amalonaticus complex members, all were identified as C. amalonaticus with the singular exception of one fecal isolate of C. farmeri. C. freundii and C. koseri were the two Citrobacter species most commonly (80 of 93 [86%]) isolated from extraintestinal sources (genitourinary tract, wounds, blood).

Bacterial Typing Techniques↗