Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDICITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Pitfalls in paediatric appendicitis: Highlighting common clinical features of missed cases.

OBJECTIVE: Missed cases of paediatric appendicitis lead to a delay in diagnosis and increased complications during the subsequent surgery. We aim to identify the common clinical features of such cases at the time of first hospital attendance. METHODS: Case records of patients with a missed diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively, documenting the presentation, preliminary investigations, initial diagnosis and eventual outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients fitted our criteria over a 2-year and 5-month period. The rate of "missed appendicitis" was 7%. The commonest symptoms and signs were that of nausea and vomiting (74.4%), abdominal pain (74.4%) and fever (61.5%). The site of abdominal pain was rarely in the right iliac fossa (5.1%). The two commonest diagnoses made at first presentation was that of gastroenteritis (51.3%) and constipation (25.6%). Twenty patients (51.3%) were initially discharged home. Compared to those initially admitted, more of those initially discharged home underwent surgery delayed beyond 24 hours from first presentation. CONCLUSION: The paucity of symptoms and signs in the right lower quadrant does not exclude appendicitis. Gastroenteritis and colic constipation are the greatest masqueraders of paediatric appendicitis. A high index of suspicion, therefore, is necessary to avoid wrongful discharge altogether.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2003

Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of perforated appendicitis in children often involves a combination of surgical and medical therapy. The aim of this study was to document the degree of consensus in the current management of perforated appendicitis in children. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was sent to all practicing pediatric surgeons in North America in April 2000 who were members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association for 1999-2000. Survey questions pertained to preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative practice patterns, particularly those issues related to use of antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Among eligible surgeons, 80.2% completed the survey. Although more than 80% of respondents practiced in an academic setting, only 17% of surgeons used a formal clinical practice guideline to direct care. Responses varied substantially in the duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy, the use of intravenous or oral agents or both, and the duration of hospitalization. A considerable number of patients are receiving a portion of their intravenous antibiotic therapy as outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: There is little apparent consensus in the many aspects of perioperative and postoperative care of perforated appendicitis in children across North America. Only a fraction of surgeons currently uses a formal clinical practice guideline for treatment of perforated appendicitis, although increased pressures to develop more cost-effective therapeutic strategies can encourage development of additional guidelines. Definitive evidence to inform development of such guidelines and enhance consensus is lacking. Further studies are needed across institutions to better inform clinical decisions in light of a changing practice environment and treatment alternatives.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Institutional variations in the management of patients with acute appendicitis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate institutional differences in preoperative workup, operative approach, complications, and cost in patients with acute appendicitis. A retrospective chart review was performed of all adults operated on for acute appendicitis from June 1999 to November 2000 at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) and Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC). Variables compared included age, race, sex, duration of symptoms, type of symptoms, results of radiographic evaluation, time from emergency room to operating room, operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic), operative time, length of hospital stay, pathologic findings, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Fisher's exact test. A total of 154 appendectomies were performed for acute appendicitis at UNMH and 165 at SUMC. Statistically significant differences were found at UNMH vs. SUMC in time from emergency room to operating room (9.1 hours vs. 13.7 hours; P<0.001), operative approach (48% laparoscopic vs. 29% open; P<0.001), and negative appendectomy rate (13% vs. 4.8%; P<0.001). There were no differences in the perforation rate or other complications. Cost analysis showed that $56,744 more was spent at UNMH for the additional negative appendectomy operations, whereas $99,842 more was spent at SUMC for the additional CT scans. Institutional differences in the management of patients with acute appendicitis can result in significant differences in cost without clinically significant differences in outcome. The use of clinical examination and laparoscopy as diagnostic modalities instead of CT scanning resulted in a more cost-effective approach.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Appendicitis in children younger than 3 years of age: an 18-year experience.

Appendicitis in children younger than 3 years of age has always been of concern due to its low incidence and high perforation rate. In this study, we analyzed our experience and evaluated the factors contributing to the delay in diagnosis. During the last 18 years, there were nine children younger than 3 years of age who presented with appendicitis. Four of these patients visited our emergency department within 48 hours after the onset of symptoms, while the symptoms had already persisted for more than 48 hours in the remaining five patients before their arrival in our emergency department. Perforated appendicitis was found in all children. Once the perforation had occurred for more than 2 days, complaints of fever, abdominal distention, and diarrhea were common. Compared to patients with symptoms for less than 2 days, those with symptoms for more than 2 days were younger and had higher serum C-reactive protein levels, significantly longer operation time, duration of postoperative ileus and length of hospital stay (LOS) (p = 0.026, 0.014, 0.018, and 0.014, respectively). No mortality was noted in the entire series, but seven of the nine patients had one or more complications, which may have prolonged LOS; anemia and wound infections were the two most common problems. Since delayed diagnosis is common, a thorough understanding of the clinical course of perforated appendicitis is important. Fever, diarrhea, and abdominal distention seem to be late manifestations. Prolonged LOS, operation time, and postoperative complications may be reduced if the operation is performed earlier.

Appendicitis↗
PubMed2006

Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging.

Evaluating children for appendicitis can be extremely difficult, and various strategies have been developed to improve the precision of preoperative diagnosis. Among these, ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are now widely used but remain controversial. Although CT scanning is superior to ultrasound in terms of diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis, the large dose of ionizing radiation from CT and the risk of subsequent radiation-induced malignancy (RIM) are of particular concern in pediatric patients. This article reviews the literature on the pathophysiology, morbidity and mortality of appendicitis, summarizes the data regarding pediatric imaging in appendicitis, provides a practical approach to imaging for clinicians who evaluate pediatric patients, and makes recommendations for reducing the risk of RIM in pediatric patients.

Appendicitis↗
PubMed2002

Does size really matter--using a decision tree approach for comparison of three different databases from the medical field of acute appendicitis.

Decision trees have been successfully used for years in many medical decision making applications. Transparent representation of acquired knowledge and fast algorithms made decision trees one of the most often used symbolic machine learning approaches. This paper concentrates on the problem of separating acute appendicitis, which is a special problem of acute abdominal pain, from other diseases that cause acute abdominal pain by use of an decision tree approach. Early and accurate diagnosing of acute appendicitis is still a difficult and challenging problem in everyday clinical routine. An important factor in the error rate is poor discrimination between acute appendicitis and other diseases that cause acute abdominal pain. This error rate is still high, despite considerable improvements in history-taking and clinical examination, computer-aided decision-support, and special investigation such as ultrasound. We investigated three databases of different size with cases of acute abdominal pain to complete this task as successful as possible. The results show that the size of the database does not necessary directly influence the success of the decision tree built on it. Surprisingly we got the best results from the decision trees built on the smallest and the biggest database, where the database with medium size (relative to the other two) was not so successful. Despite this we were able to produce decision tree classifiers that were capable of producing correct decisions on test data sets with accuracy up to 84%, sensitivity to acute appendicitis up to 90%, and specificity up to 80% on the same test set.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Appendicitis caused by caecal carcinoma--a case report.

Appendicitis can occur rarely in association with carcinoma of the caecum, particularly in elderly patients. The prognosis for caecal or proximal colonic neoplasm presenting as appendicitis is poor. This is in part due to the association being missed at the initial laparotomy. We report a case of acute appendicitis provoked by an adenocarcinoma of the caecum which obstructed the lumen of appendix in an 84 years old patient by which a simple ileocaecal resection was performed. The difficulties of identifying a small tumor at laparotomy and the implication for optimal treatment are emphasized. It is suggested that a more aggressive attitude should be taken in the pre and postoperative management of any patient over 50 years of age who presents with appendicitis.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of ultrasonography and clinical diagnostic scoring in suspected appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Several diagnostic aids have been developed to improve diagnosis in suspected appendicitis including ultrasonography and clinical diagnostic scoring. The aim of this study was to elaborate a new scoring system and to measure its accuracy in the preoperative diagnosis of appendicitis, comparing it with the available scoring systems. METHODS: The clinical, radiological and ultrasonographic data of 192 patients with suspected appendicitis were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Only six of the 12 variables analysed were shown to have prognostic significance. Using Bayesian methodology, a weight was given to each criterion and two overall scores were calculated (ultrasonographic and classical scores). A cut-off point was identified to separate patients who needed surgery and those for observation. The ultrasonographic score showed an 81 per cent sensitivity and a 96 per cent specificity, compared with 60 and 73 per cent respectively for the classical score. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography increases the diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2003

Granulomatous appendicitis progressing to Crohn's disease with bleeding complication.

Granulomatous appendicitis can be idiopathic or due to a number of specific causes. Idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis is regarded as a separate disease entity and usually has a benign course. We report on a case of granulomatous appendicitis, which progressed to fulminant Crohn's colitis shortly after appendicectomy. During the treatment with intravenous steroid, torrential gastro-intestinal bleeding developed and emergency subtotal colectomy had to be performed. The clinical and histological features of the case are presented and the literature on granulomatous appendicitis reviewed.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Neutrophil count in the normal appendix and early appendicitis: diagnostic index of real acute inflammation.

It is generally accepted that the uninflammed appendix does not contain neutrophils. In view of that, we searched for the presence of neutrophils in 60 uninflammed appendectomies and compared the findings with the neutrophil count in 20 cases of early appendicitis. In the uninflammed appendix, the upper third of the mucosa showed a mean of 0.75 neutrophils (N) per 5 high power fields (HPF), 4.71 N/5 HPF in the middle third, and 2.70 N/5 HPF in the deep third. At the suberosa, a mean of 3.41 and 3.32 N per 10 post-capillary venules in respectively longitudinal and transverse sections of the organ were present. The number of neutrophils in the mucosa showed a positive correlation with the number in the subserosa. In the early appendicitis we observed a mean of 12.53 N/5 HPF in the upper third, 11.33 N/5 HPF in the middle third, and 13.0 N/5 HPF in the deep third; at the subserosa, a mean of 4.95 N/10 post-capillary venules in transverse sections and 4.45 N/10 post-capillary venules in longitudinal sections was observed. No positive correlation between N in the mucosa and subserosa was observed. The count of N in the mucosa of normal appendix and early appendicitis showed a significant difference (P <.005). We conclude that, although present, not more than 10 neutrophils/5 HPF are found in the mucosa of uninflammed appendixes. Neutrophil count in the lamina propria should support the diagnosis of "normal" appendix and could be an indicator for suspecting early appendicitis, preventing underdiagnosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of men and women presenting to an ED with acute appendicitis.

Appendicitis is a common problem presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). Missed or delayed diagnosis can result in increased morbidity and is a common cause of malpractice claims. Diagnosis in women is more difficult because of additional clinical considerations. The study hypothesis is that women with appendicitis presenting to an ED experience a longer delay to operative intervention resulting in an increased rate of perforated appendix. A retrospective chart review of 196 male and female patients between twelve and fifty years of age presenting to the ED with final discharge diagnosis of appendicitis was performed. Mean time from ED presentation to operative intervention was 477 minutes for men and 709 minutes for women (P = .02). Perforated appendix was present in 38.7% of men and 23.5% of women (P = .002). Women with appendicitis presenting to an ED experience significant delay to surgery, however, this is not associated with an increased rate of perforation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Accuracy of ED sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

The objective was to compare the accuracy of abdominal sonography performed by emergency physicians in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with that of the surgeons' clinical impression. Three hundred-seventeen patients with right lower abdominal pain admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine at National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan were prospectively included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the time of day they visited the emergency department. Those patients visiting the emergency department during the day were included in group I and those during the night were in group II. Group I was diagnosed by sonography. Group II was diagnosed by surgeons' clinical impression without sonographic examination. The definitive diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by the pathological reports. In the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, group I had a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 67.6%, a positive predictive value of 89.8%, a negative predictive value of 86.2%, and an accuracy of 89.1%, and group II had a sensitivity of 86.2%, a specificity of 37.0%, a positive predictive value of 74.6%, a negative predictive value of 55.6%, and an accuracy of 70.6%. The overall accuracy of sonography performed by emergency physicians in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was superior to that of the surgeons' clinical impression.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Appendicitis and infections of the appendix.

The pathologic spectrum of the acutely inflamed appendix encompasses a wide range of infectious and noninfectious entities. The appendix suffers alone in some of these disorders, and in others may be involved through extension from other areas of the gastrointestinal tract. Although the appendix is the most commonly resected and examined intraabdominal organ, the pathogenesis and etiology of acute nonspecific appendicitis (the most common diagnosis made in this organ) remains enigmatic. This review encompasses the pathology, pathogenesis, and bacteriology of acute appendicitis, as well as controversial issues such as the diagnosis of chronic appendicitis and the significance of a morphologically unremarkable appendectomy specimen in the clinical context of appendicitis. In addition, the pathologic features, pertinent diagnostic techniques, and clinical significance of several specific bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections affecting the appendix are presented, including adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, Yersinia species, actinomycosis, Mycobacteria species, histoplasmosis, pinworms, schistosomiasis, and Strongyloides stercoralis.

Appendicitis↗
PubMed2007

Current management of appendicitis.

Appendicitis is the most common surgical disease of the abdomen in children. Pediatric appendicitis varies considerably in its clinical presentation, contributing to delay in diagnosis and increased morbidity. The methods of diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis also vary significantly among clinicians and medical centers according to the patient's clinical status, the medical center's capabilities, and the physician's experience and technical expertise. Recent trends include the increased use of radiologic imaging, minimally invasive and nonoperative treatments, shorter hospital stays, and home antibiotic therapy. Little consensus exists regarding many aspects of the care of the child with complicated appendicitis. This article examines the most debated aspects of the diagnosis and management of the diseased pediatric appendix.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

An economic evaluation of sonographic examination of children with suspected appendicitis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency presenting in the pediatric population. Approximately one third of these patients present with equivocal signs and symptoms frequently resulting in inpatient observation or additional diagnostic investigation. Although sonographic examination of patients with suspected appendicitis has been shown to be a highly accurate diagnostic modality, the cost effectiveness of this technology in the pediatric population has not been addressed. The economic value of this examination can be evaluated using a structured decision analysis. METHODS: The authors constructed a decision analysis model of treatment strategies for 2 groups of patients with a suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Patients were categorized as either presenting with a "definitive acute abdomen" or "equivocal examination." Data drawn from published literature reports of the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, institution-specific cost data, and expert judgment were used to construct 2 decision trees. These data were used to determine the least costly diagnostic strategy for each group of patients, and sensitivity analysis performed to assess the robustness of the conclusions. RESULTS: The use of ultrasonography in patients with "an acute abdomen" is not cost efficient and results in average additional cost of $234 per patient. In patients with equivocal diagnoses who are discharged from the emergency room after a negative ultrasound examination finding results in an average cost savings of $260 when compared with admission and observation. Patients who are discharged without examination incur an average additional cost of $373 as a result of the high cost of a missed diagnosis resulting in a perforated appendix. CONCLUSION: The use of ultrasonography can be recommended for children with suspected appendicitis and equivocal examinations who are discharged from the emergency room after a negative examination result.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed2000

Application of a clinical score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 197 patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to validate a clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood. METHODS: The authors retrospectively applied a clinical scoring system on 197 consecutive pediatric patients operated on for acute appendicitis. They therefore looked for a correlation between the management suggested by the scoring system and pathologic diagnosis on surgical specimens. RESULTS: Based on final pathologic specimen, surgery has been performed unnecessarily in 23% of cases. The proposed scoring system could have reduced unnecessary surgery to 2%. Only 8% of patients with acute appendicitis would have been discharged home. Sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system used in this study was 87% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The clinical scoring system proposed in this study could be of help in early clinical diagnosis of appendicitis to reduce the rate of unnecessary emergency surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Acute perforated neonatal appendicitis associated with chorioamnionitis.

Perforation of the appendix is rare in term neonates and even more rare in prematures. In most of the reported cases it is a complication of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) but can also complicate Hirschsprung's disease (HD), cystic fibrosis (CF) or acute appendicitis (AA). We present a pre-term newborn, born to a mother who had bacteriaemia associated with chorioamnionitis. On his sixth day of life he had clinical and radiological signs of perforated abdominal viscus. Laparotomy and histologic findings indicated acute perforated appendicitis. The association of acute perforated appendicitis with chorioamnionitis points to the role of maternal foetal infection in the aetiology of neonatal acute appendicitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[Appendicitis in the last decade of the 20th century--Analysis of two prospective multicenter clinical observational studies].

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The authors present an accurate and comprehensive snapshot of appendicitis in the last decade of the 20 (th) century. The present study also aims to determine the influence of introduction of laparoscopic techniques on the quality of appendicitis therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted for suspected appendicitis were recruited into this prospective multicenter study. Two different periods of time were considered: from 1. 7. 1988 to 31. 12. 1989, 6 266 patients from 18 hospitals were included, and from 1. 6. 1996 to 31. 5. 1997, 7 398 patients from 34 institutions. RESULTS: In the first period (1988/89), 1 869 patients were treated conservatively (29.8 %), 4 397 (70.2 %) were operated. Histopathological analysis of the appendix documented no acute inflammation in 28.8 %, the perforation rate was 8.3 % and the wound infection rate 9.6 %. In the second period (1996/97), 2 430 patients were treated conservatively (32.8 %), in 24.9 % of all operated cases, the histopathological examination shows no acute inflammation of the appendix, the perforation rate was 5.9 % and the rate of wound infections 2.5 %. During this second period, 33.2 % of all appendectomies were performed using the laparoscope, the conversion rate was 7.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of laparoscopic techniques did not modify the operative indications for treatment of appendicitis. An increase in the number of normal appendices removed was not observed. The number of perforations and the incidence of wound infections was significantly reduced in the second period.

Adolescent↗