Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vomiting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 721 records · Page 40Linked to original sources

The use of ondansetron in the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with acetaminophen poisoning.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting associated with poisoning can complicate treatment and in some cases delay potential antidote administration. Side effect such as lowering the seizure threshold may at times discourage the use of traditional phenothiazine and butyrophenone antiemetics. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single arm, observational study examining the effectiveness of the 5HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron in the management if nausea and vomiting associated with acetaminophen poisoning. Patients with a history or laboratory evidence of acetaminophen poisoning were eligible for inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 or greater than 65, use of other antiemetic therapy within the previous 12 hours, history of preexisting hepatic or hematologic disease, pregnancy, or significant ingestion of other substances. Upon meeting entry criteria, patients were administered 8 mg of intravenous ondansetron. Nausea was graded on a 100 mm scale with number of emetic episodes recorded before and after treatment. RESULTS: Six patients were entered in the study. All patients had nausea and at least one emetic episode prior to ondansetron and prior to administration of N-acetylcysteine. All patients reported relief of nausea after ondansetron. The degree of nausea decreased by an average of 52% at 30 min and 88% at 60 min following ondansetron administration. No significant vital sign changes were recorded in any patient, and there were no complications related to therapy. Three patients were administered N-acetylcysteine, and all tolerated this therapy without vomiting after ondansetron. CONCLUSIONS: Ondansetron appears to be a potentially useful adjunct in the management of nausea and vomiting associated with acetaminophen poisoning.

Acetaminophen↗

[The effects of foot reflexology on nausea, vomiting and fatigue of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of foot reflexology on nausea, vomiting and fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHOD: The research was a quasi-experimental study using a non-equivalent pre-post design and was conducted from Jan. 26, to Mar. 20, 2004. The subjects consisted of 34 patients with 18 in the experimental group and 16 in control group. A pretest and 2 posttests were conducted to measure nausea, vomiting and fatigue. For the experimental group, foot reflexology, which was consisted of 4 phases for 40 minutes, was given by a researcher and 4 research assistants. The collected data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA using the SPSS WIN 10.0 program. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in nausea, and vomiting in the experimental group compared to the control group over two different times. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in fatigue in the experimental group compared to the control group over two different times. CONCLUSION: Foot reflexology was effective on nausea, vomiting and fatigue in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in this study. Therefore, foot reflexology can be usefully utilized as a nursing intervention in the field of cancer nursing for breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Adult↗

Unexplained vomiting: a diagnostic challenge.

When vomiting is not related to preventing the entry of physically or chemically unsuitable substances into the absorbing gut, it may be regarded as pathologic. The commonest causes of chronic vomiting are structural lesions affecting the mucosa of the upper gastrointestinal tract (often with luminal obstruction) and psychogenic disorders. Diseases affecting extrinsic and intrinsic neural control of gut motility and visceral smooth muscle may also cause unexplained vomiting. A stratified management approach to patients with vomiting is suggested. The first assessment is aimed at exclusion of mucosal lesions of the upper gut and systemic or psychiatric disease that may affect it. Second is a therapeutic trial, usually with a prokinetic agent. The final phase, reserved for recalcitrant undiagnosed patients, is evaluation at special centers with gastric emptying studies, gastrointestinal manometry, other electrophysiologic studies, and, in a few patients, laparotomy with examination of full-thickness biopsy specimens of the small intestine.

Autonomic Nervous System Diseases↗

The impact of the menstrual cycle and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting.

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was studied in a prospective group of 94 women of child-bearing age (18-42 years), undergoing unilateral elective thyroid surgery. In a subgroup of 47 examinees the postoperative nausea and vomiting episodes were analyzed according to the time of surgery within their menstrual cycle: the highest occurrence was observed in the periovulatory and premenstrual periods (65.5% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.02). In the formal part of this study, 25 patients randomly received ondansetron (8 mg intravenous [i.v.]): they had significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting than their 22 placebo controls (4 ml saline i.v.): 16.0% vs. 45.5% (p < 0.04). It is concluded that elective surgery in young and middle-aged female patients is best avoided premenstrually and in the middle of their cycle. In these very periods, however, ondansetron effectively reduces the incidence and intensity of postoperative nausea and vomiting by about 70%.

Adolescent↗

[Efficacy of combination with granisetron and methylprednisolone for nausea, vomiting and appetite loss in remission induction chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia--a randomized comparative trial between granisetron alone and granisetron plus methylprednisolone].

The prevention of nausea, vomiting and appetite loss induced by remission induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia was compared by randomization between granisetron alone and combination with granisetron plus methylprednisolone. Granisetron was administered at 40 micrograms/kg during chemotherapy, and methylprednisolone was administered concomitantly at 125 mg/body for 3 days or more in the combination group. The single and combination groups comprised 14 and 13 patients, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the background of both groups. To evaluate the effect they were scored according to 4 grades, and evaluated every 24 hours from the start of chemotherapy to 5 days after its completion. The complete inhibition rate of vomiting was as high as 71.4% and 92.3% in the single and combination groups, respectively, showing no significant difference. The grade of vomiting was mild in both groups. Nausea was noted in 71.4% and 46.2%, respectively, and the inhibitory effect tended to be higher in the combination group. Appetite loss developed in 92.9% and 41.7%, respectively, and the prevention effect was clearly higher in the combination group. The prevention effects on nausea 7, 8 and 10 days after the start of chemotherapy, on appetite loss 2-10 days after it, and 2-5 days after its completion, were higher in the combination group. Granisetron revealed an excellent inhibitory effect on vomiting induced by remission induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia, but combination with granisetron and methylprednisolone was considered useful for nausea in the latter half of the treatment period and for appetite loss during the whole period.

Acute Disease↗

[Intractable vomiting, convulsions and megaloblastic anemia: anamnesis, key to diagnosis].

In July 1996 a 43-year-old illiterate Hispanic woman presented with uncontrollable vomiting, palpitations and confusion. In 1994, despite several hospitalisations in other medical centres where a cerebral CT-scan, oesogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy and abdominal ultrasound were performed, no satisfactory diagnosis could be found. A psychiatric origin was finally considered. On admission, the laboratory findings showed severe metabolic alkalosis with associated hypokalaemia, confirmatory evidence of vomiting. The ECG showed tremendous P waves (5 mV) in the standard derivations, which can be explained by the hypokalaemia, with multiple supraventricular extrasystoles. Echocardiography and pulmonary scintigraphy ruled out pulmonary hypertension and a pulmonary embolus. After additional discussion with her daughter we discovered that the patient had been treating chronic headaches for years with 4-5 Cafergot-PB suppositories per day. This drug contains 2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 100 mg butalbital, 100 mg caffeine and 0.25 mg belladona alkaloids. As is known, vomiting is a classical symptom of ergotamine intoxication. After rehydration we discovered a megaloblastic anaemia with a folate deficiency compatible with chronic barbiturate intoxication. Folate and iron supplementation allowed a rapid normalisation of the haemoglobin values. Five months after having stopped the Cafergot-PB, the patient was well and did not vomit anymore. The headaches were treated with chlorpromazine with a good result. Despite sophisticated technical means, the diagnosis could only be established after a thorough history taking. This message should be heard in times when high tech medicine tends to obscure the place of a good history taking!

Adult↗

Is cyclical vomiting an abdominal form of migraine in children?

Cyclical vomiting is an intermittent episodic disorder found most commonly in children. It bears considerable similarities to abdominal migraine and to migraine headaches. It has been proposed that cyclical vomiting is a form of or juvenile equivalent of migraine and that there is a spectrum of disease encompassing cyclical vomiting, abdominal migraine, and migraine headaches. There are considerable overlaps among the syndromes that support this concept. It seems, however, unlikely that all cases of cyclical vomiting are migranous in origin.

Adolescent↗

Mitochondrial disease and cyclic vomiting syndrome.

Mutations of mitochondrial DNA are being increasingly recognized as a cause of human disease. Six unrelated children have been evaluated with cyclic vomiting syndrome and a strong maternal family history suggesting a mitochondrial DNA mutation. Manifestations suggestive of migraine were present in each child. Additional clinical findings present in all cases include: developmental delay (3/6 cases), seizures (3/6), and poor growth (3/6). The age of onset for vomiting episodes was < or = 1 year in five cases. An elevated body fluid lactate (lactic acid) was found in 5/6 cases. A mitochondrial DNA mutation was confirmed in one child with the finding of a large rearrangement. These cases suggest that mitochondrial DNA mutations can cause cyclic vomiting syndrome. Mitochondrial disease should be considered in cases of cyclic vomiting, especially those with additional pathology or possible maternal inheritance. Initial screening should include plasma lactate and urine organic acids obtained during an episode.

Adolescent↗

[A case of relapsing multiple sclerosis presenting with only autonomic symptoms including orthostatic hypotension, hiccups and vomiting].

A 49-year-old woman, with a two-year-history of multiple screlosis (MS), noticed postural dizziness, intractable hiccups and vomiting. On admission, she had mild quadriparesis, hypesthesia below the C5 level, and a girdle sensation at the T5 and L1 levels. A CSF examination showed slight increases in the protein level (48 mg/dl) and cell count (7/mm3). Brain MRI demonstrated no obvious lesion in the medulla oblongata. The head-up-tilting test showed a decrease in the blood pressure from 105/63 mmHg to 70/55 mmHg. The pulse rate, however, increased from 57/min to 72/min. The cold pressure test also revealed a mild impairement in her blood pressure response. The R-R interval variation (coefficient of variation: CVRR) during normal breathing was 2.58 (normal: > 1.66). The valsalva ratio was 1.84 (normal: 1.4-2.0). The Aschner eye-ball pressure test, the blood pressure response to the injection of epinephrine, and the sweating response to the injection of acetylcholine were all normal. She was thus administered domperidone and chlorpromazine. Only domperidone effectively improved the nausea and vomiting. All symptoms, including orthostatic hypotension, hiccups and vomiting, disappeared about one month after admission. The remission of her symptoms was considered to reflect the natural course of MS. The results of autonomic nervous system function tests and her clinical features suggest that an irritable lesion in the medullary tegmentum, including the nucleus tractus solitarii, most likely caused her symptoms. The above findings indicate that autonomic symptoms, such as orthstatic hypotension, hiccups and vomiting, may sometimes be the only symptoms observed in a relapse of MS.

Autonomic Nervous System Diseases↗

[Cyclic vomiting with ketosis as a cause of acute kidney dysfunction: own clinical experience].

The aim of the study was to evaluate renal activity during cyclic vomiting with ketosis. The clinical material was obtained from 50 cases of children hospitalized in Department of Pediatrics Military Medical University within 1993-1999 what makes about 1% of all patients. The examined group consisted of 26 boys (52%) and 24 girls (48%). Three of the children were repeatedly hospitalized (3 to 8 times) because of acetonemic vomiting. The special attention during the laboratory studies was paid to evaluation of renal activity. Vomiting with ketosis were associated with temporary kidneys acute dysfunction in 46% of cases. In 98% of cases the parenteral hydration was necessary. Ketonemic vomiting with kidneys dysfunction was observed mainly with the children in pre-school age.

Acute Disease↗

[Phase III clinical studies with ondansetron (Qilu) in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by non-cisplatin chemotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to further determine the clinical value of ondansetron (OND, supplied by Qilu Pharmaceutical Company) in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by non-cisplatin chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 193 patients were enrolled in the multicenter prospective study and were given treatment of non-cisplatin based chemotherapy. All patients were treated with OND 8 mg i.v. once a day during chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally twice a day for one day after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The effective control rate (0-2 emetic episodes) on the first day was 93.3%. Total control of delayed vomiting (day 2-5) was as high as 94.8 to 99.5%. The mean frequency of vomiting was 0.4, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.1, respectively from day 1 to day 5. Adverse effects were minor and tolerable. CONCLUSION: This modified regimen of treatment with OND is effective in the control of vomiting induced by non-DDP chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗

Prevention of acute and delayed cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting with intravenous ondansetron plus intravenous dexamethasone.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the anti-emetic effect of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting with intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron plus i.v. dexamethasone. METHODS: One hundred forty-six chemotherapy (CT)-naive patients were enrolled in the study. They were scheduled to receive cisplatin 50 to 100 mg/m2 (mean, 53 mg/m2) on day 1 followed immediately by continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil with or without other CT agents on the subsequent days. Three 8 mg doses of ondansetron i.v. were given at 4-hour intervals plus 20 mg dexamethasone i.v. infusions from the start of CT, followed by 5 mg dexamethasone i.v. every 12 hours, and the administration of dexamethasone was discontinued after the completion of CT. RESULTS: The rates of complete protection from acute and delayed vomiting/nausea obtained in these patients were 97.3%/93.2% and 71.2%/60.3%, respectively. The rates of complete protection from both acute and delayed nausea were 70.5% and 58.9%, respectively. By comparison, the total control rate of vomiting was less in female patients than in male patients (p = 0.017), and the total control rate of nausea was lower in the age group less than 50 years (p = 0.045). The time from the start of CT to the onset of nausea appeared to be earlier than that for vomiting (log-rank test, p = 0.045). Adverse events tended to be minor, with constipation and hiccups as the most common. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that i.v. ondansetron plus i.v. dexamethasone is a feasible anti-emetic therapy in an inpatient setting. I.v. ondansetron plus i.v. dexamethasone is highly effective in preventing acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

Acute Disease↗

Appraisal of drug therapy for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: I. The placebo effect - methodological and practical considerations.

BACKGROUND: Despite that nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is the most common medical problem during pregnancy, the placebo effect in the treatment of this condition has not been properly evaluated. METHODS: Two published randomized, controlled trials comparing the antiemetic effects of vitamin B6 with placebo were analyzed. RESULTS: When the severity of nausea or vomiting in the placebo groups at baseline was compared with that at the end of the trials, there was a clear time-dependent placebo effect that peaked between days 4 and 5. The placebo effect appeared to be more pronounced in nausea than in vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear placebo effect on NVP. The effect appears to be stronger with nausea than with vomiting.

Female↗

[Clinical study on preventing and treating chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting using supplemented Inula-Ochrae Decoction].

OBJECTIVE: To observe supplemented Inula-Ochrae Decoction (SIOD) in preventing and treating nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy for patients with malignant tumour. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were divided into two groups, the patients in test group took SIOD and in control group using ondensetron, and the efficacy of SIOD in preventing and treating chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting were studied prospectively with self-intersection approach. RESULTS: The effective rate of treating vomiting due to chemotherapy with DDP and without DDP in the test group was 92.7% and 93.5% respectively, and was higher than that in the control group 87.8% and 87.1%, the difference was insignificant statistically (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription SIOD could prevent and treat effectively chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting without any toxic and side effects, and is inexpensive with high efficacy for clinical use.

Adolescent↗

Post-operative nausea and vomiting in out-patient gynecologic laparoscopy: a comparison of thiopental-nitrous oxide, propofol-nitrous oxide and total intravenous anesthesia using propofol.

An intravenous anesthetic drug, propofol was considered to pose antiemetic action. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate whether propofol could effectively reduce post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to thiopental-nitrous oxide (N2O). One-hundred and eight patients undergoing outpatient gynecologic laparoscopy were assigned to receive 3 techniques of anesthesia; thiopental-N2O (T/N), propofol-N2O (P/N) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol (P/P). The results showed that in the early period (0-5 hours), post-operative nausea in T/N, P/N and P/P groups was 72 per cent, 44 per cent and 31 per cent, respectively (P = 0.002), and post-operative vomiting was 58 per cent, 36 per cent and 11 per cent respectively (P = 0.00014). Patients in the P/N and P/P groups experienced nausea less frequently than the T/N group [relative risk (RR) = 0.62, (95% CI 0.41-0.93) and RR = 0.42 (0.25-0.72) respectively]. Patients in the P/N and P/P groups experienced vomiting less frequently than the T/N group [RR = 0.62 (0.37-1.04) and RR = 0.19 (0.07-0.5) respectively]. Two patients in the T/N group were admitted because of severe nausea and vomiting. In conclusion, TIVA using propofol and propofol-N2O anesthesia can significantly reduce the incidence of PONV in the early period. Concerning the economic crisis of the country as well as the quality of care, propofol-N2O would be the most appropriate anesthetic of choice.

Adult↗

Food satiation as a procedure to decelerate vomiting.

A food satiation procedure was used in two experiments to decelerate the frequency of vomiting responses in two profoundly retarded adults who exhibited well-defined vomiting-ruminatory response chains. For several years prior to this study, the subjects had exhibited a history of vomiting behavior. Satiation was accomplished during regular meals and consisted of allowing the subjects to eat until a satiation criterion of food refusal was achieved. The results revealed a 94 percent reduction of vomiting in Experiment 1 and a 50 percent response reduction in Experiment 2. Ten-day follow-up sessions indicated that the response reduction was maintained in both experiments. In Experiment 1 the subject exhibited a 4.99 kg weight gain at the 10-day follow-up with a total of 13.61 kg weight gain at a 4-week posttreatment weight check.

Feeding Behavior↗

Use of reversal agents in day care procedures (with special reference to postoperative nausea and vomiting).

There is some confusion about the contribution of reversal of residual paralysis to the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aim of this review is to discuss whether antagonism of residual paralysis is a cause of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and to assess the risk of residual paralysis if the reversal is omitted. Data from a meta-analysis published before 1998 were considered, along with trials published after that date to assess the influence of reversal of residual paralysis on postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the likelihood of harm when antagonism was omitted. Moreover, an overview of pathophysiological consequences, incidence and clinical consequences of residual paralysis is given and the actual criteria of the adequacy of neuromuscular recovery presented. When emetic outcomes are combined across all trials and all different neostigmine doses, there is no beneficial effect from omitting neostigmine on postoperative nausea and vomiting, but there is some evidence of a dose-responsiveness with neostigmine; higher doses may have emetic properties. However, omitting reversal introduces a non-negligent risk of residual paralysis. An improved understanding of the pathological consequences of residual paralysis (i.e. impaired laryngeal and pharyngeal muscle function, alterations in hypoxic ventilatory control, reduced margin of safety) led to establishment of more rigorous criteria for defining adequacy of neuromuscular recovery. A train-of-four ratio of > or = 0.9 is now accepted as the index of adequate recovery of neuromuscular function. Applying this new definition, residual paralysis becomes a frequent adverse side-effect. Neuromuscular recovery should therefore be routinely monitored in ambulatory patients and residual paralysis prevented by reversing neuromuscular block.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

[The clinical effect of Tropisetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by anti-cancer drugs].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of Tropisetron with Kytril in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by anti-cancer drugs. METHODS: In a clinical randomized controlled cross-over trial, 34 patients (19 among them treated with regimens containing cisplatin) were randomized into A and B group. In group A, Tropisetron was given in the first cycle and Kytril in the second cycle, while in group B Kytril was given in the first and Tropisetron in the second cycle of the same chemotherapy. RESULTS: In the Tropisetron treated group, the response rate was 97.1% with 4.5 episodes of vomiting on the first day of chemotherapy, while that in the Kytril treated patients was 94.1% with 3 episodes of vomiting. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. Control of delayed emesis and other adverse reactions were comparable in both arms and there was no notable difference between Tropisetron and Kytril. CONCLUSION: Tropisetron is an effective anti-emetic drug to prevent nausea and vomiting caused by anti-tumor agents, and its adverse reactions are mild.

Adolescent↗