Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Spinal Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 721 records · Page 40Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Clinical clearance of cervical spinal injuries by emergency nurses.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the interrater reliability between emergency nurses and emergency physicians on defined criteria for clinically clearing the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients, 12 years or older, arriving with cervical spinal precautions were prospectively enrolled as a convenience sample. Each member of the emergency physician-nurse pair completed a questionnaire with regard to five criteria for clinically clearing the cervical spine for each patient. Interrater reliability was determined by calculating the kappa statistics for the individual and combined criteria. RESULTS: Physicians and nurses agreed on the presence or absence of the combined criteria in 175 of 211 patients (82.9%; kappa, 0.65). Agreements on individual criteria were as follows: 1) intoxication--203 patients (96.2%; kappa, 0.82); 2) altered consciousness--197 patients (93.4%; kappa, 0.60); 3) neck pain--185 patients (87.7%; kappa, 0.75); 4) distracting injury--160 patients (75.8%; kappa, 0.36); and 5) neurologic deficit--198 patients (93.8%; kappa, 0.45). If disagreements in which the physician would clinically clear the patient but the nurse would not were considered as agreements, then overall agreement would be 198 of 211 patients (93.8%; kappa, 0.88). On the assumption that nurses would assess patients prior to physicians, they would have cleared 35% of the patients before the physicians. However, they would have ordered 12% more radiographs and unsafely clinically cleared 5% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The interrater reliability for the combined cervical spinal injury criteria between emergency nurses and physicians was good to excellent. However, with the training given in this study, nurses would order more radiographs than physicians and would unsafely clinically clear cervical spines in some patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

[Rehabilitation problems in traumatic spinal cord injuries following spinal stabilization using Harrington's fixation device].

Authors describe their experiences in medical rehabilitation of 18 patients with traumatic injuries of the medulla after spinal stabilisation with Harrington instrument. The Harrington method is a classical method for spinal stabilization used in the whole world. Besides its doubtless advantages experiences are gathered on its numerous disadvantages: It is not suitable for direct reduction, its stability is insufficient against flexion and extension forces, its biomechanical characteristics are not the most favourable in respect of consolidation, it is too long and includes healthy sections of the spine in immobilization, finally external fixation is needed. For all this, the claims of modern rehabilitation cannot be fulfilled. In possession of newer, more modern methods (fixateur interne, groove plate) the use of it is not at all recommended.

Bone Plates↗