Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 721 records · Page 40Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Runt domain partner proteins enhance DNA binding and transcriptional repression in cultured Drosophila cells.

BACKGROUND: The Drosophila gene runt plays multiple roles during embryogenesis, including one as a pair-rule class segmentation gene. The runt protein (Runt) contains an evolutionarily conserved domain (the Runt domain) that is found in several mammalian proteins including the human protein AML1, which is involved in many chromosome translocations associated with leukaemia. Specific DNA binding activity of a mammalian Runt domain is enhanced by a partner protein called PEBP2beta/CBFbeta. DNA binding activity of Drosophila Runt is also stimulated by this protein, suggesting the existence of a similar Runt partner protein in Drosophila. RESULTS: We report here the cloning of two closely linked Drosophila genes, runt domain partner (rp) beta1 and beta2, that encode homologues of mouse PEBP2beta/CBFbeta. They are highly homologous to each other and to the mammalian counterpart. Either of the rpb proteins is capable of forming a complex with Runt and stimulating its DNA binding activity, but their temporal and spatial distributions are quite dissimilar, suggesting that functional specificity of Runt may be conferred by the interacting partner. Runt represses transcription dominantly when coexpressed with either partner in cultured cells, a function consistent with a direct role for Runt in regulating expression of the even-skipped gene in Drosophila embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Drosophila Runt can interact with either of two Runt domain partners, and the resulting complex functions as an active repressor of transcription.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Down-modulation of interleukin-6 gene expression by 17 beta-estradiol in the absence of high affinity DNA binding by the estrogen receptor.

The mechanism of repression of the interleukin-6 (IL-6) promoter by 17 beta-estradiol (E2) was investigated in cells transfected with wild-type (wt) or mutant estrogen receptor (ER) expression vectors. In transient transfection experiments, IL-1-induced activation of the IL-6 promoter was efficiently inhibited by wt ER. However, estrogen receptors carrying mutations within or over-lapping with the DNA binding domain did not repress IL-6 promoter activity. A mutant receptor lacking the N-terminal transactivator function-1 but retaining the C-terminal transactivator function-2 also repressed activation of the IL-6 promoter. Our recent experiments indicate the requirement for both the nuclear factor (NF)-IL6 and the NF-kappa B sites in the IL-6 promoter for activation by IL-1. We now show that activation of the IL-6 promoter, elicited by a combination of NF-IL6 and the p65 subunit of NF-kappa B, can be inhibited by the wt receptor but not by a receptor containing a mutation in its DNA binding domain. Although a deletion within the DNA binding domain of ER abolished the repressor function of the receptor, a chimeric receptor ER-GR CAS1, in which the DNA binding domain of ER was swapped with the complementary region from the glucocorticoid receptor, retained the inhibitory effects on the IL-6 promoter. This was in contrast to the absolute dependence of ER on its own DNA binding domain for activation of typical estrogen response element-containing promoters, as reported previously by other investigators. Furthermore, the repression of the IL-6 promoter by a combination of ER and E2, unlike activation of estrogen response elements by the same combination, did not appear to be mediated via high affinity binding of the receptor to the promoter. In functional experiments, the transactivator function of ER was totally inhibited by overexpression of p65 and to a lesser extent by that of NF-IL6. These results indicate that ER may repress gene expression in the absence of high affinity DNA binding.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

The lytic switch protein of KSHV activates gene expression via functional interaction with RBP-Jkappa (CSL), the target of the Notch signaling pathway.

The RTA protein of the Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is responsible for the switch from latency to lytic replication, a reaction essential for viral spread and KS pathogenesis. RTA is a sequence-specific transcriptional activator, but the diversity of its target sites suggests it may act via interaction with host DNA-binding proteins as well. Here we show that KSHV RTA interacts with the RBP-Jkappa protein, the primary target of the Notch signaling pathway. This interaction targets RTA to RBP-Jkappa recognition sites on DNA and results in the replacement of RBP-Jkappa's intrinsic repressive action with activation mediated by the C-terminal domain of RTA. Mutation of such sites in target promoters strongly impairs RTA responsiveness. Similarly, such target genes are induced poorly or not at all by RTA in fibroblasts derived from RBP-Jkappa(-/-) mice, a defect that can be reversed by expression of RBP-Jkappa. In vitro, RTA binds to two adjacent regions of RBP-Jkappa, one of which is identical to the central repression domain that binds the Notch effector fragment. These results indicate that KSHV has evolved a ligand-independent mechanism for constitutive activation of the Notch pathway as a part of its strategy for reactivation from latency.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

v-SRC specifically regulates the nucleo-cytoplasmic delocalization of the major isoform of TEL (ETV6).

TEL is a frequent target of chromosomal translocations in human cancer and an alleged tumor suppressor gene. TEL encodes two isoforms: a major TEL-M1 isoform as well as TEL-M43, which lacks the first 42 amino acid residues of TEL-M1. Both isoforms are potent transcriptional repressors that can inhibit RAS-induced transformation. Here we show that the v-SRC protein-tyrosine kinase relieves the repressive activity of TEL-M1, an activity that is associated with the v-SRC-induced delocalization of TEL-M1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. TEL-M1 delocalization requires the kinase activity of v-SRC and is not induced by oncogenic RAS or AKT. Cytoplasmic delocalization of TEL-M1 in response to v-SRC critically depends upon its unique amino-terminal domain (SRCD domain) because (i). v-SRC did not inhibit the repressive properties of TEL-M43, nor affected TEL-M43 nuclear localization; (ii). fusion of the first 52 amino acid residues of TEL-M1 to FLI-1, an ETS protein insensitive to v-SRC-induced delocalization, is sufficient to confer v-SRC-induced delocalization to this TEL/FLI-1 chimeric protein. The v-SRC-induced nucleo-cytoplasmic delocalization of TEL-M1 does not involve phosphorylation of the SRCD and does not require TEL self-association and repressive domains. Finally, enforced expression of the v-SRC-insensitive TEL-M43, but not of TEL-M1, inhibits v-SRC-induced transformation of NIH3T3 fibroblasts. These results identify a regulatory domain in TEL that specifically impinges on the subcellular localization of its major TEL-M1 isoform. They, furthermore, indicate that inhibition of TEL-M1 nuclear function is required for v-SRC to induce cellular transformation.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Evidence that the hormone-binding domain of the mouse glucocorticoid receptor directly represses DNA binding activity in a major portion of receptors that are "misfolded" after removal of hsp90.

After dissociation of cytosolic heteromeric glucocorticoid receptor complexes by steroid, salt, and other methods, only 35-60% of the dissociated receptors can bind to DNA-cellulose. The DNA-binding and non-DNA-binding forms of the dissociated receptors have the same Mr and are phosphorylated to the same extent (Tienrungroj, W., Sanchez, E. R., Housley, P. R., Harrison, R. W., and Pratt, W. B. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 17347-17349). The basis for the different DNA-binding activities is unknown, but the DNA-binding fraction of the receptor has a more basic pI than the non-DNA-binding fraction (Smith, A. C., Elsasser, M. S., and Harmon, J. M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 13285-13292). We have separated the non-DNA-binding state of the receptor from the DNA-binding state and then cleaved it with trypsin and chymotrypsin. We find that the 15-kDa tryptic fragment derived from the non-DNA-binding state of the dissociated receptor is fully competent in binding DNA, whereas the 42-kDa chymotryptic fragment containing both the hormone-binding and DNA-binding domains does not bind DNA. Trypsin cleavage of the molybdate-stabilized untransformed receptor also yields a 15-kDa fragment that is fully competent in binding DNA. Reducing agents do not restore DNA-binding to the non-DNA-binding fraction of the receptor and the hormone-binding domain can be separated from the DNA-binding domain on nonreducing gel electrophoresis. These results argue that the two domains are not linked by disulfide bridges, and they are consistent with the proposal that there are two least energy states of folding after dissociation of hsp90. A significant portion of the receptors is "misfolded" in such a manner that the steroid binding domain is directly preventing DNA-binding activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

A functionally conserved N-terminal domain of the friend of GATA-2 (FOG-2) protein represses GATA4-dependent transcription.

GATA4 is a transcriptional activator of cardiac-restricted promoters and is required for normal cardiac morphogenesis. Friend of GATA-2 (FOG-2) is a multizinc finger protein that associates with GATA4 and represses GATA4-dependent transcription. To better understand the transcriptional repressor activity of FOG-2 we performed a functional analysis of the FOG-2 protein. The results demonstrated that 1) zinc fingers 1 and 6 of FOG-2 are each capable of interacting with evolutionarily conserved motifs within the N-terminal zinc finger of mammalian GATA proteins, 2) a nuclear localization signal (RKRRK) (amino acids 736-740) is required to program nuclear targeting of FOG-2, and 3) FOG-2 can interact with the transcriptional co-repressor, C-terminal-binding protein-2 via a conserved sequence motif in FOG-2 (PIDLS). Surprisingly, however, this interaction with C-terminal-binding protein-2 is not required for FOG-2-mediated repression of GATA4-dependent transcription. Instead, we have identified a novel N-terminal domain of FOG-2 (amino acids 1-247) that is both necessary and sufficient to repress GATA4-dependent transcription. This N-terminal repressor domain is functionally conserved in the related protein, Friend of GATA1. Taken together, these results define a set of evolutionarily conserved mechanisms by which FOG proteins repress GATA-dependent transcription and thereby form the foundation for genetic studies designed to elucidate the role of FOG-2 in cardiac development.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2002

Mutations of the WD repeats that compromise Tup1 repression function maintain structural integrity of the WD domain trypsin-resistant core.

The yeast global transcriptional repressor Tup1 contains 7 WD repeats in its C-terminus that form a beta-propeller-like structure, in which the first and last WD repeats interact to make a closed circle. The WD domains of all proteins tested, including Tup1, form a compact structure resistant to trypsin digestion (Garcia-Higuera et al., Biochemistry 35 (1996) 13985-13994). We found that the in vitro formation of the trypsin-resistant core of Tup1 requires just five WD repeats (WD2-6). Deletion of the ST region between WD1 and WD2 destabilizes the trypsin-resistant core, but maintains Tup1 repression function in vivo. Linker insertion and point mutations in the WD repeats that compromise Tup1 repression function in vivo still maintain the trypsin-resistant core in vitro These results indicate that structural perturbation of the WD domain structure cannot explain the effects of these mutations on Tup1 repression function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

TEL is a sequence-specific transcriptional repressor.

TEL is a gene frequently involved in specific chromosomal translocations in human leukemia and sarcoma that encodes a member of the ETS family of transcriptional regulators. TEL is unusual among other ETS proteins by its ability to self-associate in vivo, a property that is essential to the oncogenic activation of TEL-derived fusion proteins. We show here that TEL is a sequence-specific transcriptional repressor of ETS-binding site-driven transcription of model and natural promoters. Deletion of the oligomerization domain of TEL or its substitution by the homologous region of monomeric ETS1 impaired the ability of TEL to repress. In contrast, substitution of the oligomerization domain of TEL by unrelated oligomerization domains resulted in an active repressor, showing that the ability of TEL to repress depends on its ability to self-associate. The study of the properties of TEL fusions to the heterologous DNA binding domain of Gal4 identified two autonomous repression domains in TEL, distinct from its oligomerization domain, that are essential to the ability of TEL to repress ETS-binding site-containing promoters. These results have implications for the normal function of TEL, its relation to other ETS proteins, and its role in leukemogenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Integrating transcriptional and signalling networks during muscle development.

A fundamental aspect of developmental decisions is the ability of groups of cells to obtain the competence to respond to different signalling inputs. This information is often integrated with intrinsic transcriptional networks to produce diverse developmental outcomes. Studies in Drosophila are starting to reveal a detailed picture of the regulatory circuits controlling the subdivision of the dorsal mesoderm, which gives rise to diverse muscle types including cardioblasts, pericardial cells, body wall muscle and gut muscle. The combination of a common set of mesoderm autonomous transcription factors (e.g. Tinman and Twist) and spatially restricted inductive signals (e.g. Dpp and Wg) subdivide the dorsal mesoderm into different competence domains. The integration of additional signalling inputs with localised repression within these competence domains results in diverse transcriptional responses within neighbouring cells, which in turn generates muscle diversity.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Functional domains of the rDNA promoter display a differential recognition in Leishmania.

A construct containing the RNA polymerase I promoter of Leishmania (L.) amazonensis, driving the expression of cloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter gene, was better recognised by heterologous hosts species Leishmania (L.) major and Leishmania (L.) mexicana than by the homologous host L. (L.) amazonensis. The rDNA promoter domains responsible for recognition were functionally mapped. The core domain (-74 to +170) conferred a barely equal recognition on homologous or heterologous cells, slightly favouring to the later. Addition of the upstream domain (-196 to -74) repressed the expression in all cells tested. The third domain, consisting of repeated elements (upstream to -196 in L. (L.) amazonensis), enhanced by about 20 times the core activity of homologous species and by about 40 times the heterologous ones. Gel mobility shift patterns generated by the binding of core sequence of L. (L.) amazonensis to nuclear extracts of the Leishmania species suggested that the rDNA transcriptional machinery is a complex DNA-protein association particular for each species. A model is proposed to explain the mechanism and possible interactions of transcription machinery in the regulation of rDNA expression in phylogenically related organisms.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

TEL, a putative tumor suppressor, modulates cell growth and cell morphology of ras-transformed cells while repressing the transcription of stromelysin-1.

TEL is a member of the ETS family of transcription factors that interacts with the mSin3 and SMRT corepressors to regulate transcription. TEL is biallelically disrupted in acute leukemia, and loss of heterozygosity at the TEL locus has been observed in various cancers. Here we show that expression of TEL in Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells inhibits cell growth in soft agar and in normal cultures. Unexpectedly, cells expressing both Ras and TEL grew as aggregates. To begin to explain the morphology of Ras-plus TEL-expressing cells, we demonstrated that the endogenous matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin-1 was repressed by TEL. TEL bound sequences in the stromelysin-1 promoter and repressed the promoter in transient-expression assays, suggesting that it is a direct target for TEL-mediated regulation. Mutants of TEL that removed a binding site for the mSin3A corepressor but retained the ETS domain failed to repress stromelysin-1. When BB-94, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, was added to the culture medium of Ras-expressing cells, it caused a cell aggregation phenotype similar to that caused by TEL expression. In addition, TEL inhibited the invasiveness of Ras-transformed cells in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that TEL acts as a tumor suppressor, in part, by transcriptional repression of stromelysin-1.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1997

The ZiN/POZ domain of ZF5 is required for both transcriptional activation and repression.

ZF5 is a ubiquitously expressed protein originally identified by its ability to bind and repress the murine c-myc promoter. It contains five C-terminal zinc fingers and a conserved N-terminal ZiN/POZ domain. This motif, found in a growing number of zinc finger proteins, can inhibit DNA binding and mediate dimerization [Bardwell, V.J. and Treisman,R. (1994) Genes Dev., 8,1664-1677]. In the current study, a cyclic amplification and selection of targets (CAST) protocol detected preferred ZF5 binding sites which are highly GC-rich. Binding to these sites by ZF5 depended upon the zinc fingers and was enhanced when the ZiN/POZ domain was removed. Using transient cotransfection assays, ZF5 was shown to activate the HIV-1 LTR and repress the beta-actin promoter. The ZiN/POZ domain was shown to mediate ZF5-dependent transcriptional activation and repression. From these data, we conclude that ZF5 can both activate and repress in the context of different natural promoters and that its ZiN/POZ domain can affect two functions; DNA binding and transcriptional modulation.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2006

Transcription factor FOXM1c is repressed by RB and activated by cyclin D1/Cdk4.

The proliferation-stimulating transactivator FOXM1c (MPP2) is repressed by RB and activated by cyclin D1/Cdk4 and therefore behaves like E2F. Despite its strong transactivation domain, FOXM1c is kept almost inactive by two different inhibitory domains, the N-terminus and the central domain. The tumor suppressor RB binds directly to the central domain of FOXM1c and thereby indirectly represses the transactivation domain, so that the central domain of FOXM1c functions as an RB-recruiting negative-regulatory domain. Cyclin D1/Cdk4 releases FOXM1c from this repression by RB and from the repression by its own inhibitory N-terminus, thereby strongly activating FOXM1c. However, cyclin D1/Cdk4 does not directly affect the transactivation domain or the DNA-binding domain. By phosphorylation of RB, but not FOXM1c, cyclin D1/Cdk4 interrupts their direct interaction and thus abrogates the repression of FOXM1c by RB. Cyclin D1/Cdk4 also eliminates the inhibition of the transactivation domain by the N-terminus of FOXM1c, probably by interruption of their direct interaction. Consequently, the G1-phase proliferation signal cyclin D1/Cdk4 converts FOXM1c from an almost inactive form into a strong transactivator in G1-phase, i.e., just at the time point at which the transcriptional activity of FOXM1 is required for stimulation of the G1/S-transition.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Flanking HS-62.5 and 3' HS1, and regions upstream of the LCR, are not required for beta-globin transcription.

The locus control region (LCR) was thought to be necessary and sufficient for establishing and maintaining an open beta-globin locus chromatin domain in the repressive environment of the developing erythrocyte. However, deletion of the LCR from the endogenous locus had no significant effect on chromatin structure and did not silence transcription. Thus, the cis-regulatory elements that confer the open domain remain unidentified. The conserved DNaseI hypersensitivity sites (HSs) HS-62.5 and 3'HS1 that flank the locus, and the region upstream of the LCR have been implicated in globin gene regulation. The flanking HSs bind CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) and are thought to interact with the LCR to form a "chromatin hub" involved in beta-globin gene activation. Hispanic thalassemia, a deletion of the LCR and 27 kb upstream, leads to heterochromatinization and silencing of the locus. Thus, the region upstream of the LCR deleted in Hispanic thalassemia (upstream Hispanic region [UHR]) may be required for expression. To determine the importance of the UHR and flanking HSs for beta-globin expression, we generated and analyzed mice with targeted deletions of these elements. We demonstrate deletion of these regions alone, and in combination, do not affect transcription, bringing into question current models for the regulation of the beta-globin locus.

5' Flanking Region↗
PubMed2004

Plant class B HSFs inhibit transcription and exhibit affinity for TFIIB and TBP.

Plant heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) are capable of transcriptional activation (class A HSFs) or both, activation and repression (class B HSFs). However, the details of mechanism still remain unclear. It is likely, that the regulation occurs through interactions of HSFs with general transcription factors (GTFs), as has been described for numerous other transcription factors. Here, we show that class A HSFs may activate transcription through direct contacts with TATA-binding protein (TBP). Class A HSFs can also interact weakly with TFIIB. Conversely, class B HSFs inhibit promoter activity through an active mechanism of repression that involves the C-terminal regulatory region (CTR) of class B HSFs. Deletion analysis revealed two sites in the CTR of soybean GmHSFB1 potentially involved in protein-protein interactions with GTFs: one is the repressor domain (RD) located in the N-terminal half of the CTR, and the other is a TFIIB binding domain (BD) that shows affinity for TFIIB and is located C-terminally from the RD. A Gal4 DNA binding domain-RD fusion repressed activity of LexA-activators, while Gal4-BD proteins synergistically activated strong and weak transcriptional activators. In vitro binding studies were consistent with this pattern of activity since the BD region alone interacted strongly with TFIIB, and the presence of RD had an inhibitory effect on TFIIB binding and transcriptional activation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

The role of Phox2b in synchronizing pan-neuronal and type-specific aspects of neurogenesis.

Within the developing vertebrate nervous system, specific subclasses of neurons are produced in vastly different numbers at defined times and locations. This implies the concomitant activation of a program that controls pan-neuronal differentiation and of a program that specifies neuronal subtype identity, but how these programs are coordinated in time and space is not well understood. Our previous loss- and gain-of-function studies have defined Phox2b as a homeodomain transcription factor that coordinately regulates generic and type-specific neuronal properties. It is necessary and sufficient to impose differentiation towards a branchio- and viscero-motoneuronal phenotype and at the same time promotes generic neuronal differentiation. We have examined the underlying genetic interactions. We show that Phox2b has a dual action on pan-neuronal differentiation. It upregulates the expression of proneural genes (Ngn2) when expressed alone and upregulates the expression of Mash1 when expressed in combination with Nkx2.2. By a separate pathway, Phox2b represses expression of the inhibitors of neurogenesis Hes5 and Id2. The role of Phox2b in the specification of neuronal subtype identity appears to depend in part on its capacity to act as a patterning gene in the progenitor domain. Phox2b misexpression represses the Pax6 and Olig2 genes, which should inhibit a branchiomotor fate, and induces Nkx6.1 and Nkx6.2, which are expressed in branchiomotor progenitors. We further show that Phox2b behaves like a transcriptional activator in the promotion of both, generic neuronal differentiation and expression of the motoneuronal marker Islet1. These results provide insights into the mechanisms by which a homeodomain transcription factor through interaction with other factors controls both generic and type-specific features of neuronal differentiation.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The transcriptional repressor protein PRH interacts with the proteasome.

PRH (proline-rich homeodomain protein)/Hex is important in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation. We have shown previously that PRH contains two domains that can bring about transcriptional repression independently; the PRH homeodomain represses transcription by binding to TATA box sequences, whereas the proline-rich N-terminal domain can repress transcription by interacting with members of the Groucho/TLE (transducin-like enhancer of split) family of co-repressor proteins. The proteasome is a multi-subunit protein complex involved in the processing and degradation of proteins. Some proteasome subunits have been suggested to play a role in the regulation of transcription. In the present study, we show that PRH interacts with the HC8 subunit of the proteasome in the context of both 20 and 26 S proteasomes. Moreover, we show that PRH is associated with the proteasome in haematopoietic cells and that the proline-rich PRH N-terminal domain is responsible for this interaction. Whereas PRH can be cleaved by the proteasome, it does not appear to be degraded rapidly in vitro or in vivo, and the proteolytic activity of the proteasome is not required for transcriptional repression by PRH. However, proteasomal digestion of PRH can liberate truncated PRH proteins that retain the ability to bind to DNA. We discuss these findings in terms of the biological role of PRH in gene regulation and the control of cell proliferation.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1995

Characterization of functional domains within the multifunctional transcription factor, YY1.

YY1 is a multifunctional transcription factor capable of either activation or repression of transcription. Using a series of mutant proteins, we have characterized domains responsible for activation or repression. We found that the YY1 transcriptional activation domain lies near the amino terminus and requires amino acids 16-29 and 80-100 for maximal activity. The region between residues 16 and 29 has the potential to form an acidic amphipathic helix, whereas residues between 80 and 100 are rich in proline and glutamine. The YY1 repression domain lies near the carboxyl terminus and is embedded within the YY1 zinc finger region necessary for binding to DNA. Deletion of YY1 amino acids, which include zinc fingers 3 and 4, abolishes repression. However, site-directed mutagenesis, progressive deletion, and internal deletion mutant analyses indicate that the normal structures of zinc fingers 3 and 4 are not required for repression.

3T3 Cells↗