Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Indinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 721 records · Page 40Linked to original sources

Efficacy of salvage therapy containing ritonavir and saquinavir after failure of single protease inhibitor-containing regimens.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of salvage therapy containing ritonavir and saquinavir after failure of indinavir- or nelfinavir-containing regimens, and to determine correlates of success or failure. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING. The Moore Clinic - the HIV clinic of Johns Hopkins Hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-one HIV-infected patients were identified through physician contacts, referrals from other providers, and review of a comprehensive clinical database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To determine response to salvage therapy, HIV-1 viral RNA (absolute and log10-transformed) was measured using the Roche Amplicor quantitative HIV-1 RNA assay after initiation of the salvage regimen. Potential correlates of response included: viral RNA at the time of switch; viral RNA at the time of switch as a percentage of baseline viral RNA; magnitude of decline in viral RNA; and the interval between virologic failure of single protease inhibitor therapy and switch to the salvage regimen. RESULTS: Thirteen (56.5%) of 23 patients failing indinavir responded to salvage therapy (HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml) with persistence throughout the follow-up period (median of 37 weeks; range 18-67 weeks). Mean absolute viral RNA at the time of switch was 20 238 copies/ml (median, 9281) compared with 42 953 copies/ml (median, 24 650) for the 10 non-responders. Mean log10 viral RNA at switch was 3.804 for responders versus 4.405 for non-responders (P = 0.040). Among four responders who had failed nelfinavir, mean viral RNA was 9634 copies/ml and mean log10 viral RNA was 3.749 at the time of switch. Two non-responders had a mean viral RNA of 21 551 and a mean log10 viral RNA of 4.037 at switch. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous reports, salvage regimens containing ritonavir and/or saquinavir can be effective and durable following the failure of combination regimens containing either indinavir or nelfinavir. Salvage therapy may be more likely to succeed when it is initiated early in failure at low viral loads.

Adult↗

Factors associated with clinical and virological failure in patients receiving a triple therapy including a protease inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of virological and clinical failure in patients receiving a protease inhibitor as part of triple therapy. METHODS: From the French Hospital Database on HIV, 1402 protease inhibitor-naive patients starting a highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen with ritonavir, saquinavir-hard gel capsule (hgc) or indinavir between July 1996 and March 1997, and with measured HIV RNA at baseline and at 12 months, were studied for progression to a new AIDS-defining event (ADE) or death. Virological failure was defined as plasma HIV RNA > 1000 copies/ml at 12 months. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox models for clinical outcomes and logistic regression for virological outcomes. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 14.1 months, 94 (6.7%) patients experienced an ADE or died. At 12 months, 700 patients (49.9%) had virological failure. In the multivariate analysis, baseline CD4 cell count and viral load were found to be independent predictors of both virological and clinical failure. Neither the type of the first protease inhibitor taken nor previous antiretroviral therapy experience was associated with risk of clinical progression. For virological failure, the use of saquinavir-hgc was associated with a significant 1.96-fold increase in risk compared with indinavir; pre-treated patients were at higher risk than antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. CONCLUSION: In this study with large samples of patients, the use of saquinavir-hgc was associated with higher risk of virological failure at 12 months than were ritonavir and indinavir; no differences between protease inhibitors were found for clinical progression. As biases cannot be excluded, a longer duration of follow-up will be necessary to answer the question of whether the results are really discrepant or simply reflect the delay between virological failure and clinical manifestations.

Adult↗

Disease progression, adherence, and response to protease inhibitor therapy for HIV infection in an Urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Indinavir therapy has demonstrated promise in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in clinical trials; however, its efficacy in a U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, where access to therapy is generally unimpeded, is unknown. A review of the Miami cohort was conducted for the year beginning May 1996 to evaluate response to indinavir plus two nucleoside analogues. Of 483 HIV-1-positive patients (97% male; mean age, 46.7+/-9.7 years), 266 were offered indinavir based on their having CD4 counts <200 cells/microl or viral loads >10,000 copies/ml. Of these patients, 36% were adherent and experienced significant reductions in viral loads (-93,325+/-147,911 copies/ml) and elevations in CD4+ (111+/-103 cells/microl) and CD8+ (225+/-338 cells/microl) T cell counts. Adherent patients with baseline CD4 counts <100 cells/microl were 4.5 times more likely to have follow-up viral loads >10,000 copies/ml than those with CD4 >200 cells/microl. Adherent patients with CD4 counts <100 cells/microl did not show evidence of immune "exhaustion" because they were equal to those with CD4 counts >200 cells/microl in their capacity to replenish CD4 cells. Nonadherence to the regimen resulted in loss of therapeutic benefit and suggested that strategies to enhance adherence may become an essential component of treatment.

Adult↗

Dose-finding study of a once-daily indinavir/ritonavir regimen.

In antiretroviral therapy, to improve compliance the need is increasing to develop regimens that combine potency and safety with convenient dosing. The objective of our study was to find a once-daily dosing regimen of a HIV-protease inhibitor, indinavir (IDV), by combining it with ritonavir (RTV). In the study, 12 healthy volunteers took a single IDV dose of 800 mg on day 1. Plasma and urine sampling was done for 12 hours. From day 2 to day 21, participants took RTV liquid 200 mg (group A) or 400 mg (group B) once daily. Repeated pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over the course of 24 hours, after single doses of indinavir 400 mg (day 15), 800 mg (day 18), and 1200 mg (day 21). The best dosage regimen in this pharmacokinetic study was selected based on efficacy and tolerability criteria. The study comprised 10 male and 2 female healthy volunteers, mean age, 25 years (range, 18-50 years), mean weight, 70 kg (range, 52-83 kg). One male participant discontinued on day 8 due to influenza. All other participants completed the study without the occurrence of serious adverse events. RTV inhibited indinavir plasma clearance by 51% to 70%, leading to increased and prolonged IDV exposure. Renal clearance was influenced by the addition of RTV and dosage increments of IDV. The efficacy criterion was best fulfilled by 1200 mg IDV/400 mg RTV, whereas this combination performed most poorly on tolerability criteria. Based on the single dose data, a once-daily regimen of IDV with a low dose of RTV is possible. The best dosage regimen to start with among those studied here appears to be 1200 mg IDV/400 mg RTV, which could be decreased at steady state to 800 IDV/400 RTV or 1200 IDV/200 RTV if toxicity occurs. Steady-state pharmacokinetic data of once-daily IDV/RTV regimens in HIV-infected patients are warranted.

Adolescent↗

An alternate binding site for the P1-P3 group of a class of potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors as a result of concerted structural change in the 80s loop of the protease.

Structures of the complexes of HIV protease inhibitor L--756,423 with the HIV-1 wild-type protease and of the inhibitors Indinavir, L-739,622 and Saquinavir with the mutant protease (9X) containing nine point mutations (Leu10Val, Lys20Met, Leu24Ile, Ser37Asp, Met46Ile, Ile54Val, Leu63Pro, Ala71Val, Val82Thr) have been determined. Comparative analysis of these structures reveals an alternate binding pocket for the P1-P3 group of Indinavir and L--756, 423. The alternate binding pocket is a result of concerted structural change in the 80s loop (residues 79-82) of the protease. The 80s loop is pulled away from the active site in order to accommodate the P1-P3 group, which is sandwiched between the flap and the 80s loop. This structural change is observed for the complexes of the wild type as well as the 9X mutant protease. The study reveals that the 80s loop is an intrinsically flexible loop in the wild-type HIV-1 protease and that mutations in this loop are not necessary to result in conformational changes. Conformation of this loop in the complex depends primarily upon the nature of the bound inhibitor and may be influenced by mutations in the protease. The results underscore the need to understand the intrinsic structural plasticity of the protease for the design of effective inhibitors against the wild-type and drug-resistant enzyme forms. In addition, the alternate binding pocket for the P1-P3 group of Indinavir and L--756,423 may be exploited for the design of potent inhibitors.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Differential inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4, 3A5 and 3A7 by five human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors in vitro.

The effects of five HIV protease inhibitors (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir) on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, 3A5 and 3A7 activities were studied in vitro using testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation in recombinant CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 enzymes. The protease inhibitors showed differential inhibitory effects on the three CYP3A forms. Ritonavir and saquinavir were non-selective and preferential inhibitors of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 (K(i) 0.03 microM and 0.6-0.8 microM for ritonavir and saquinavir, respectively), and weaker inhibitors of CYP3A7 (K(i) 0.6 microM and 1.8 microM, respectively). Nelfinavir was a potent and non-selective inhibitor of all three CYP3A forms (K(i) 0.3-0.4 microM). Amprenavir and indinavir preferentially inhibited CYP3A4 (K(i) 0.1 microM and 0.2 microM, respectively), with weaker inhibitory effects on CYP3A5 (K(i) 0.5 microM and 2.2 microM, respectively) and CYP3A7 (K(i) 2.1 microM and 10.6 microM, respectively). In conclusion, significant differences exist in the inhibitory potency of protease inhibitors for different CYP3A forms. Ritonavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir and amprenavir seem to be prone to drug-drug interactions by inhibiting both CYP3A4 and CYP3A5. Especially nelfinavir and ritonavir also have a potential to inhibit foetal CYP3A7-mediated drug metabolism and some endogenous pathways that may be crucial to normal foetal development, while indinavir has the lowest potential to inhibit CYP3A5 and CYP3A7.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases↗

Pharmacokinetic study of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors used in combination with amprenavir.

In an open-label, randomized, multicenter, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study, we determined the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir with and without coadministration of indinavir, nelfinavir, or saquinavir soft gel formulation in 31 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects. The results indicated that amprenavir plasma concentrations were decreased by saquinavir soft gel capsule (by 32% for area under the concentration-time curve at steady state [AUC(ss)] and 37% for peak plasma concentration at steady state [C(max,ss)]) and increased by indinavir (33% for AUC(ss)). Nelfinavir significantly increased amprenavir minimum drug concentration at steady state (by 189%) but did not affect amprenavir AUC(ss) or C(max,ss). Nelfinavir and saquinavir steady-state pharmacokinetics were unchanged by coadministration with amprenavir compared with the historical monotherapy data. Concentrations of indinavir, coadministered with amprenavir, in plasma decreased in both single-dose and steady-state evaluations. The changes in amprenavir steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters, relative to those for amprenavir alone, were not consistent among protease inhibitors, nor were the changes consistent with potential interactions in CYP3A4 metabolism or P-glycoprotein transport. No dose adjustment of either protease inhibitor in any of the combinations studied is needed.

Adult↗

Differential effect of HIV-1 protease inhibitors on P-glycoprotein function in multidrug-resistant variants of the human CD4+ T lymphoblastoid CEM cell line.

BACKGROUND: P-glycoprotein causing multidrug resistance (MDR) and limiting the efficacy of antineoplastic drugs and protease inhibitors (PIs) is expressed in human CD4+ T lymphocytes, one of the main targets of HIV, in a range of pharmacological barriers and at varying degrees in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Kaposi's sarcoma. METHODS: The differential effect of PIs on P-glycoprotein function was studied by measuring drug efflux inhibition, MDR-reversing ability and MAb UIC2 epitope modulation in MDR variants of the human T lymphoblastoid CEM cell line. RESULTS: The treatment of MDR cells with PIs induces different UIC2 epitope modulations indicating a differential recognition and binding of these antiviral drugs by MDR1 P-glycoprotein. In fact, ritonavir, saquinavir and indinavir act differently to the P-glycoprotein blocker in CEM-VBL10 cells. The MDR level of these cells was markedly affected by ritonavir and saquinavir in the order, while the PI indinavir does not seem to compete with the P-glycoprotein drug transport function. In CEM-VBL100 cells, expressing a very high number of P-glycoprotein molecules, only ritonavir acts as an efficient drug efflux inhibitor and MDR-reversing agent. CONCLUSION: The HIV-1 PIs ritonavir and saquinavir even at different levels act as genuine P-glycoprotein substrates by inhibiting dye substrate efflux, modulating UIC2 epitope and reversing drug resistance. Conversely, at least in the in vitro system used in the present study, the PI indinavir does not significantly alter P-glycoprotein drug transport activities and function.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

GLUT4 facilitative glucose transporter specifically and differentially contributes to agonist-induced vascular reactivity in mouse aorta.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that GLUT4 is a predominant facilitative glucose transporter in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and GLUT4 is necessary for agonist-induced VSMC contraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Glucose deprivation and indinavir, a GLUT4 antagonist, were used to assess the role of GLUT4 and non-GLUT4 transporters in vascular reactivity. In isolated endothelium-denuded mouse aorta, approximately 50% of basal glucose uptake was GLUT4-dependent. Norepinephrine-mediated contractions were dependent on both GLUT4 and non-GLUT4 transporters, serotonin (5-HT)-mediated contractions were mainly GLUT4-dependent, and prostaglandin (PG) F(2alpha)-mediated contractions were dependent on non-GLUT4 transporters, whereas indinavir had no effect in GLUT4 knockout vessels. We also observed a 46% decrease in GLUT4 expression in aortas from angiotensin II hypertensive mice. Indinavir caused a less profound attenuation of maximal 5-HT-mediated contraction in these vessels, corresponding to the lower GLUT4 levels in the hypertensive aortas. Finally, and somewhat surprisingly, chronic GLUT4 knockout was associated with increased vascular reactivity compared with that in wild-type animals, suggesting that chronic absence or reduction of GLUT4 expression in VSMCs leads to opposite effects observed with acute inhibition of GLUT4. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, we conclude that GLUT4 is constitutively expressed in large arteries and likely participates in basal glucose uptake. In addition, GLUT4, as well as other non-GLUT4 facilitative glucose transporters, are necessary for agonist-induced contraction, but each transporter participates in VSMC contraction selectively, depending on the agonist, and changes in GLUT4 expression may account for some of the functional changes associated with vascular diseases like hypertension.

Angiotensin II↗

Atherogenic dyslipidemia in HIV-infected individuals treated with protease inhibitors. The Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Administration of protease inhibitors (PIs) to HIV-infected individuals has been associated with hyperlipidemia. In this study, we characterized the lipoprotein profile in subjects receiving ritonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir, alone or in combination with saquinavir. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma lipoprotein levels were quantified in 93 HIV-infected adults receiving PIs. Comparison was done with pretreatment values and with 28 nonPI-treated HIV-infected subjects. An elevation in plasma cholesterol levels was observed in all PI-treated groups but was more pronounced for ritonavir (2.0+/-0.3 mmol/L [mean+/-SEM], n=46, versus 0.1+/-0.2 mmol/L in nonPI treated group, P<0.001) than for indinavir (0.8+/-0.2 mmol/L, n=26, P=0.03) or nelfinavir (1.2+/-0.2 mmol/L, n=21, P=0.01). Administration of ritonavir, but not indinavir or nelfinavir, was associated with a marked elevation in plasma triglyceride levels (1.83+/-0.46 mmol/L, P=0.002). Plasma HDL-cholesterol levels remained unchanged. Combination of ritonavir or nelfinavir with saquinavir did not further elevate plasma lipid levels. A 48% increase in plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) was detected in PI-treated subjects with pretreatment Lp(a) values >20 mg/dL. Similar changes in plasma lipid levels were observed in 6 children receiving ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of PIs to HIV-infected individuals is associated with a marked, compound-specific dyslipidemia. The risk of pancreatitis and premature atherosclerosis due to PI-associated dyslipidemia remains to be established.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetic interaction study of indinavir/ritonavir and the enteric-coated capsule formulation of didanosine in healthy volunteers.

Didanosine enteric-coated should be taken on an empty stomach, but the once-daily combination of indinavir/ritonavir can be taken with food. Because these drugs are frequently included in 1 regimen, the food effects on the pharmacokinetics were evaluated. This was a randomized, 4-way crossover study of single doses of didanosine enteric-coated 400 mg and indinavir/ritonavir 1200/400 mg in 8 healthy subjects. The following regimens were given: didanosine enteric-coated 2 hours after breakfast (reference regimen A), indinavir/ritonavir with breakfast (reference regimen B), didanosine enteric-coated + indinavir/ritonavir 2 hours after breakfast (test regimen C), and didanosine enteric-coated + indinavir/ritonavir with breakfast (test regimen D). Breakfast was 550 kcal, 28% fat. Blood samples were drawn before and up to 24 hours after ingestion. Statistical comparisons of test regimens C and D with reference regimens A and B were made using the equivalence approach for indinavir and didanosine area under the curve and C(max) (0.80-1.25). Eight subjects (5 men, 3 women) were enrolled and completed the study. Indinavir area under the curves were bioequivalent in test regimens C and D compared to reference regimen B. A 14% increased C(max) was observed in test regimen C. Didanosine area under the curve in test regimen D was 4% lower and suggestive of bioequivalence compared to reference regimen A. However, test regimen C didanosine area under the curve was 23% lower and bioinequivalent compared to reference regimen A. Didanosine C(max) decreased 42% and 46% in test regimens C and D, respectively, in comparison to reference regimen A. In this study, dosing didanosine enteric-coated 400 mg once daily + indinavir/ritonavir 1200/400 mg once daily with breakfast indicated no decrease in the amount of absorption for either didanosine and indinavir and that this regimen could be administered with food.

Administration, Oral↗

The effects of protease inhibitors on basal and insulin-stimulated lipid metabolism, insulin binding, and signaling.

The objective of our research was to investigate the effects of the protease inhibitors ritonavir, saquinavir, and indinavir on triglyceride synthesis, lipolysis, insulin binding, and signaling in differentiating 3T3 L1 pre-adipocytes. Saquinavir, ritonavir, and indinavir all stimulated triglyceride (TG) synthesis. Additionally, all concentrations of protease inhibitors employed (i.e., 0.1 micro M to 10 micro M) significantly decreased insulin-stimulated TG synthesis. No effects of any of the protease inhibitors were observed either on basal lipolysis or after stimulation of lipolysis with 100 nM noradrenaline. Specific (125)I-insulin binding was observed to be decreased by exposure to all the protease inhibitors throughout the period of adipocyte phenotype development. This was mediated by indinavir through a receptor decrease and had no effect on receptor affinity. During differentiation with ritonavir (i.e., 1-11 days post addition of differentiating cocktail), insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) tyrosine phosphorylation was ascertained (day 11) and found to be decreased in the ritonavir exposed cells when compared with control cells. The results reported herein demonstrate protease inhibitor effects on basal TG synthesis while exhibiting decreased insulin-stimulated TG synthesis at physiological concentrations of protease inhibitors. These effects may be subsequent to decreased insulin binding and/or IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation.

Adipocytes↗

Effects of HIV drug combinations on endothelin-1 and vascular cell proliferation.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature involving endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation, vasoconstriction, right ventricular hypertrophy, and eventually, right heart failure and death. PAH occurs 1000-fold more frequently in HIV patients than in the general population. Although conventional HIV therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) leads to regression of PAH, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART; two NRTI plus a protease inhibitor) increases the incidence of HIV-associated PAH as much as twofold. Although there are relatively few models for PAH, previous reports indicate the disease can be initiated by endothelial injury and release of the mitogen endothelin-1 (ET-1). ET-1, in turn, stimulates VSMC proliferation. To determine whether HAART induces endothelial injury and release of cytokines like ET-1, we treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells with micromolar amounts of AZT (3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine), the protease inhibitor indinavir, or AZT plus indinavir, and measured cell viability, mitochondrial function, and ET-1 release. Both AZT and indinavir induced marked decreases in cellular oxygen uptake, as well as increases in ET-1 release. Although the drugs had no apparent effect on proliferation in VSMCs alone, in cocultures of VSMCs plus endothelial cells, the drugs increased proliferation of both endothelial cells and VSMCs. Finally, when cocultures of endothelial cells and VSMCs were treated with BQ-123 and BQ-788, selective antagonists for ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, respectively, drug-induced proliferation of both VSMCs and endothelial cells was attenuated. These data thus suggest that HIV drug cocktails may exacerbate preexisting HIV-associated PAH by inducing endothelial mitochondrial dysfunction, in turn stimulating the release of ET-1, and ultimately, vascular cell proliferation.

Animals↗

Long-term effects of HIV-1 protease inhibitors on insulin secretion and insulin signaling in INS-1 beta cells.

The mechanism by which chronic treatment with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus)-1 protease inhibitors leads to a deterioration of glucose metabolism appears to involve insulin resistance, and may also involve impaired insulin secretion. Here we investigated the long-term effects of HIV-1 protease inhibitors on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from beta cells and explored whether altered insulin secretion might be related to altered insulin signaling. INS-1 cells were incubated for 48 h with different concentrations of amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir, stimulated with 20 mM d-glucose, and insulin determined in the supernatant. To evaluate insulin signaling, cells were stimulated with 100 nM insulin for 2 min, and insulin-receptor substrate (IRS)-1, -2 and Akt phosphorylation determined. Incubation for 48 h with ritonavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir resulted in impaired glucose-induced insulin secretion at 2.5, 5 and 5 microM respectively, whereas amprenavir or indinavir had no effects even at 20 and 100 microM respectively. The impaired insulin secretion by ritonavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir was associated with decreased insulin-stimulated IRS-2 phosphorylation, and, for nelfinavir and saquinavir, with decreased insulin-stimulated IRS-1 and Thr308-Akt phosphorylation. No such effects on signaling were observed with amprenavir or indinavir. In conclusion, certain HIV-1 protease inhibitors, such as ritonavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir, not only induce peripheral insulin resistance, but also impair glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from beta cells. With respect to the long-term effect on beta-cell function there appear to be differences between the protease inhibitors that may be clinically relevant. Finally, these effects on insulin secretion after a 48 h incubation with protease inhibitor were associated with a reduction of the insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of insulin signaling parameters, particularly IRS-2, suggesting that protease inhibitor-induced alterations in the insulin signaling pathway may contribute to the impaired beta-cell function.

Carbamates↗

HIV protease inhibitors acutely impair glucose-stimulated insulin release.

HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) acutely and reversibly inhibit the insulin-responsive glucose transporter Glut 4, leading to peripheral insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance. Minimal modeling analysis of glucose tolerance tests on PI-treated patients has revealed an impaired insulin secretory response, suggesting additional pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction. To determine whether beta-cell function is acutely affected by PIs, we assayed glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in rodent islets and the insulinoma cell line MIN6. Insulin release from MIN6 cells and rodent islets was significantly inhibited by the PI indinavir with IC(50) values of 1.1 and 2.1 micro mol/l, respectively. The uptake of 2-deoxyglucose in MIN6 cells was similarly inhibited (IC(50) of 2.0 micro mol/l), whereas glucokinase activity was unaffected at drug levels as high as 1 mmol/l. Glucose utilization was also impaired at comparable drug levels. Insulin secretogogues acting downstream of glucose transport mostly reversed the indinavir-mediated inhibition of insulin release in MIN6 cells. Intravenous infusion of indinavir during hyperglycemic clamps on rats significantly suppressed the first-phase insulin response. These data suggest that therapeutic levels of PIs are sufficient to impair glucose sensing by beta-cells. Thus, together with peripheral insulin resistance, beta-cell dysfunction likely contributes to altered glucose homeostasis associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Animals↗

[Discontinuing protease inhibitor treatment of HIV-1 patients for intolerance. Longitudinal study of 309 patients].

OBJECTIVES: Determine the frequency and nature of interruptions in HIV-1 protease inhibitor treatment in HIV-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A longitudinal study included patients treated with antiretroviral protocols including at least one antiprotease and followed from 1 March 1996 through 1 March 1998. RESULTS: Among the 309 patients followed for the duration of the study, 137 (44.3%) interrupted their antiprotease treatment at least once. Withdrawal was warranted by therapeutic failure in 49.6% of the cases and by drug intolerance in 45.4%. Drug intolerance concerned 37%, 36.7%, 5.7% and 2.9% of the patients taking ritonavir, indinavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir respectively (p < 106). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that saquinavir was significantly associated with better tolerance and with efficacy at least as good as ritonavir or indinavir. The most frequent cause for interrupting treatment were digestive disorders for ritonavir (20% of the treated patients) and lithiasic manifestations for indinavir (9.4%). The ritonavir-hepatitis C association appeared to predispose to drug-induced perturbed liver tests. CONCLUSION: Drug intolerance is a frequent cause of treatment interruption. Therapeutic success in HIV infection requires improved efficacy but also better tolerated antiretorviral drugs, particularly antiretroviral drugs.

Adult↗

HIV-1 protease inhibitors decrease proliferation and induce differentiation of human myelocytic leukemia cells.

Inhibitors of the protease of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) may inhibit cytoplasmic retinoic acid-binding proteins, cytochrome P450 isoforms, as well as P-glycoproteins. These features of the protease inhibitors might enhance the activity of retinoids. To explore this hypothesis, myeloid leukemia cells were cultured with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) either alone or in combination with the HIV-1 protease inhibitors indinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir. Consistent with the hypothesis, the HIV-1 protease inhibitors enhanced the ability of ATRA to inhibit growth and induce differentiation of HL-60 and NB4 myeloid leukemia cells, as measured by expression of CD11b and CD66b cell surface antigens, as well as reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium. Growth of ATRA-resistant UF-1 cells was also inhibited when cultured with the combination of ATRA and indinavir. Moreover, indinavir enhanced the ability of ATRA to induce expression of the myeloid differentiation-related transcription factor C/EBPepsilon messenger RNA in NB4 cells by 9.5-fold. Taken together, the results show that HIV-1 protease inhibitors enhance the antiproliferative and differentiating effects of ATRA on myeloid leukemia cells. An HIV-1 protease inhibitor might be a useful adjuvant with ATRA for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia and possibly retinoid-resistant cancers.

CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins↗

Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder and treatment with protease inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: report of 8 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients receiving protease inhibitor therapy who presented with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. METHODS: Between July 1996 and December 1999, 8 HIV-infected patients (7 male) treated with protease inhibitors who presented with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder were retrospectively identified. Diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis relied on clinical features including shoulder pain and both active and passive restricted range of motion (ROM). All available clinical and radiographic data were reviewed. RESULTS: Onset of symptoms was insidious, and at presentation, patients complained of shoulder pain, which was bilateral in 4 of the 8 cases. Physical examination showed global restriction of active and passive ROM of the glenohumeral joint. The mean delay between initiation of HIV protease inhibitors and onset of shoulder pain was 14 months (range 2 to 36). The protease inhibitor therapy always included indinavir. No underlying condition associated with secondary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, including shoulder trauma, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, pulmonary or cardiac diseases could be identified. In all 8 patients, despite continuation of therapy with indinavir, both shoulder pain and restricted ROM completely resolved, after a mean disease course of 7.4 months. CONCLUSION: Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder seems to be a new adverse event of HIV protease inhibitor therapy. In all reported cases, patients were treated with indinavir. Further observations will be necessary to confirm adhesive capsulitis as a side effect.

Adult↗