Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Indapamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 721 records · Page 40Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Ventricular hypertrophy and hypertension: prognostic elements and implications for management.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a strong, independent predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Patients with LVH are at increased risk for stroke, coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Hypertension is a major influence on the development of LVH. The prognostic power of LVH is likely multifactorial. LVH represents both a manifestation of the effects of hypertension and other cardiac risk factors over time as well as an intrinsic condition causing pathologic changes in cardiac structure and function. Angiotensin II plays a central role in the development of LVH. Several antihypertensive treatments, especially angiotensin II receptor blockers, can reverse LVH and improve cardiovascular outcomes independent of blood pressure reduction. Further studies are required to determine if these agents should become first-line therapy for all patients with hypertension and LVH.

Adrenergic Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

Regression of left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients treated with perindopril/indapamide as a first-line combination: the REASON echocardiography study.

BACKGROUND: Increase in left ventricular mass (LVM) may be linked to morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients. Arterial stiffness, systolic blood pressure (BP), and pulse pressure (PP) seem to be the main determinants of LVM. The perindopril/indapamide combination normalizes systolic BP, PP, and arterial function to a greater extent than atenolol. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of perindopril (2 mg)/indapamide (0.625 mg) first-line combination with atenolol (50 mg) on LVM reduction in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients with essential hypertension participating in the PREterax in Regression of Arterial Stiffness in a ContrOlled Double-BliNd (REASON), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, underwent M-mode two-dimensional-guided echocardiography. RESULTS: Perindopril/indapamide and atenolol were both effective at brachial BP reduction during the 12-month period. The systolic BP reduction was significantly greater with perindopril/indapamide than with atenolol (-21.2 v -15.3 mm Hg), whereas the reduction in diastolic BP was similar between treatment groups (-12.1 v -11.3 mm Hg). Reduction in LVM was higher with perindopril/indapamide than with atenolol. The between-group difference was significant for LVM (-13.6 v -4.3 g, P = .027), LVM/body surface area (LVMI1, P = .032), and LVM/body height2.7 (LVMI2, P = .013). The 124 patients with LV hypertrophy at baseline showed greatest LVM regression (LVM: -22.5 v -8.9 g, P = .009; LVMI1, P = .031; LVMI2, P = .028). The reduction in LVM adjusted for brachial systolic BP and heart rate was still significantly greater with perindopril/indapamide than with atenolol. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment, based on a first-line perindopril/indapamide combination in hypertensive patients, was more effective than atenolol on regression of echocardiographic indices of LVM and LV hypertrophy.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Therapeutic monitoring of metipamide during antihypertensive therapy.

The aim of our study was to monitor metipamide during a two-month period of treatment and to determine whether the whole-blood levels estimated by high-performance liquid chromatography provide a relevant indicator of possible accumulation of the drug. We also analysed antihypertensive activity and biochemical changes in the blood of twenty hypertonic patients. The results of our clinical trial showed that metipamide is an effective first-line antihypertensive agent, in that it combines satisfactory reduction of blood pressure with a low frequency of side-effects and a simple once-daily dosage regime.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Severe heart failure: treatment optimisation and monitoring using plasma NT-proBNP levels--an useful tool in clinical practice].

A young patient presented with a cardiomegaly of unknown origin. The cardiologic examination revealed a severe eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy and a dilatation of the other heart cavities as well as a strongly impaired global systolic function. The patient was treated with an ACE inhibitor, a diuretic and with a beta-blocking agent. The dosages of which were adapted accordingly to the plasma concentration of N-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). After five months of treatment, a decrease of the NT-proBNP level to nearly normal values along with a significant reduction of the heart dimensions and a substantial improvement of left ventricular function were found.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy of very low dose perindopril 2 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg combination on left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: the P.I.C.X.E.L. study rationale and design.

The PICXEL study is designed to evaluate the effects of long-term administration of very low-dose combination perindopril 2 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg (Per/Ind) vs enalapril in reducing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive patients. This multicentre, controlled, randomised, double-blind, parallel group study is carried-out to assess the variation of left ventricular mass index (LVMI) after treatment, using a centralised control of M-mode echocardiography determinations, and a dedicated software for semi-automatic measurement. Following a 4-week placebo run-in period, hypertensive outpatients aged >/=18 years, with LVH (LVMI >120 and 100 g/m(2) for men and women, respectively), are randomised to receive once daily, over 52 weeks, either Per/Ind or enalapril. According to blood pressure levels, the dose may be adjusted. In addition to clinical examinations, ECG, blood pressure, heart rate and laboratory assessments echocardiographic determinations are performed for selection, at baseline, after 24 weeks and at the end of the study. The main outcome criteria is the change from baseline in LVMI which is considered the primary efficacy criterion; changes in blood pressure and echo-Doppler parameters constitute secondary criteria. Two-sided Student's t-test for independent samples will be used to differentiate the effects of the treatment between groups with alpha = 5%, and the inter-group difference of LVMI variation will be analysed with a power of 90%. A sample size of 500 patients is required making it necessary to randomise at least 550 patients, based on a 10% proportion of potentially non-assessable patients. The results of this study, obtained after applying strict methodological procedures and requirements, are expected to provide valuable and reliable information on the effects of long-term administration of Per/Ind on LVH, and on its potential superiority over enalapril.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1995

Effects of regular exercise on blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in African-American men with severe hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hypertension and its cardiovascular complications is higher in African Americans than in whites. Interventions to control blood pressure in this population are particularly important. Regular exercise lowers blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but its effects in patients with severe hypertension have not been studied. We examined the effects of moderately intense exercise on blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in African-American men with severe hypertension. METHODS: We randomly assigned 46 men 35 to 76 years of age to exercise plus antihypertensive medication (23 men) or antihypertensive medication alone (23 men). A total of 18 men in the exercise group completed 16 weeks of exercise, and 14 completed 32 weeks of exercise, which was performed three times per week at 60 to 80 percent of the maximal heart rate. RESULTS: After 16 weeks, mean (+/- SD) diastolic blood pressure had decreased from 88 +/- 7 to 83 +/- 8 mm Hg in the patients who exercised, whereas it had increased slightly, from 88 +/- 6 to 90 +/- 7 mm Hg, in those who did not exercise (P = 0.002). Diastolic blood pressure remained significantly lower after 32 weeks of exercise, even with substantial reductions in the dose of antihypertensive medication. In addition, the thickness of the interventricular septum (P = 0.03), the left ventricular mass (P = 0.02), and the mass index (P = 0.04) had decreased significantly after 16 weeks in the patients who exercised, whereas there was no significant change in the nonexercisers. CONCLUSIONS: Regular exercise reduced blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in African-American men with severe hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy and safety of a fixed low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination in essential hypertension. A randomised controlled study.

This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was designed to assess the efficacy and the safety of fixed low dose combination perindopril 2 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg (Per/Ind) versus atenolol 50 mg (Ate). After a 4-week placebo run-in, 446 hypertensive patients (mean age : 55.8 +/- 11.0 years) were randomised to receive Per/Ind or Ate for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the changes in trough supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sSBP, sDBP) between baseline and the last observation. Equivalence was assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis using a two one-sided tests procedure. Per/Ind and Ate decreased sSBP by -20.5 mmHg and -20.1 mmHg, respectively; the 90% confidence interval [-2.3; 1.5] of the intertreatment difference (-0.4 mmHg) fell within the predefined equivalence interval [-8; +8 mmHg]. Similarly, the sDBP decreased by -15.1 mmHg (Per/Ind) and -16.2 mmHg (Ate) with an intertreatment difference of 1.1 mmHg whose 90% confidence interval [-0.1; 2.2 mmHg] fell within the predefined equivalence interval [-4; +4 mmHg]; thus antihypertensive efficacy of Per/Ind and Ate were equivalent (P <0.001). In patients older than 65, Per/Ind induces a statistically greater decrease in sSBP than Ate (P <0.05). Per/Ind was well tolerated. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm these results on a long-term period.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Perindopril/indapamide combination more effective than enalapril in reducing blood pressure and left ventricular mass: the PICXEL study.

OBJECTIVE: Few data are available comparing the effects of monotherapy and combination therapy on target organ damage. The PICXEL study compared the efficacy of a strategy based on first-line combination with perindopril/indapamide versus monotherapy with enalapril in reducing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: In this 1-year multicentre randomized double-blind study, patients received an increasing dosage of perindopril/indapamide (n = 284) or enalapril (n = 272). Changes in blood pressure and echocardiographic measures of LVH were assessed from baseline to the end of treatment. Reading of the echocardiograms was central and blinded for therapy, patient and sequence. RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly more in the perindopril/indapamide than in the enalapril group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.003). The left ventricular mass index decreased by 13.6 +/- 23.9 g/m(2) (mean +/- SD) with perindopril/indapamide (P < 0.0001) and 3.9 +/- 23.9 g/m(2) with enalapril (P < 0.005); these decreases were significantly different (P < 0.0001). The left ventricular internal diameter, posterior and interventricular septal wall thickness decreased significantly with perindopril/indapamide (P < or = 0.0001); the interventricular septal wall thickness decreased significantly with enalapril (P < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A strategy based on first-line combination with perindopril/indapamide achieved better blood pressure decrease with a significantly greater degree of LVH reduction than a strategy based on monotherapy with enalapril in hypertensive patients with LVH.

Adult↗