Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDICITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 721 records · Page 40Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient.

BACKGROUND: The surgical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is customarily made on clinical grounds alone using history, physical examination, and white blood cell count. In the atypical patient, ie, the patient with prolonged symptoms, inconsistent history, or misleading physical examination, diagnostic studies should be helpful in establishing the appropriate diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) scan and ultrasonography (US) have demonstrated utility in diagnosing appendicitis but have not been studied in the atypical patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review of 500 consecutive appendectomy patients, coupled with a review of the literature, resulted in the development of an algorithm to help the medical physician to differentiate the atypical patient requiring an imaging study from those requiring immediate surgical consultation. This patient population was entered into a prospective, randomized study of CT scan or US examination. RESULTS: Between May 1997 and May 1999, 106 patients were enrolled in the study; 17 were later excluded from the study because of typical presentation and direct admission to surgery without diagnostic imaging. Forty-nine patients were randomly assigned to CT scan and 40 to US examination. CT scan was 100% specific and 97% sensitive (P = 0.018). US was 90% specific and 76% sensitive. Based on the results of these imaging studies, 70 of the study patients underwent exploration for suspected appendicitis or other acute inflammatory process. CONCLUSION: A subset of patients presenting with possible acute appendicitis has been identified that should benefit from imaging of the appendix prior to surgical consultation. For this group, CT scan appears superior to abdominal and pelvic US in terms of diagnostic accuracy and reliability. With this approach, a low incidence of negative laparotomies was achieved.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography (CT) for appendicitis has recently been demonstrated. What is its clinical utility? METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 443 consecutive community hospital patients evaluated for acute appendicitis over an 18-month period using limited pelvic CT scan or clinical acumen alone. RESULTS: Appendicitis was pathologically proven in 158 patients. The negative appendectomy rate was 5.4%. The best radiological indicators for a positive CT for appendicitis were pericecal inflammation (88%) and appendicolith(57%). Appendiceal CT was found to have a 92% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, and a 97.5% accuracy. There were 260 patients who had a negative CT; 243 of these were sent home. Alternative diagnoses were identified in 22% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The liberal use of noncontrast helical CT results in a low negative appendectomy rate and a high degree of confidence that a negative CT will allow patients to be sent home safely.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

The rational use of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, limited abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans have been reported (Rao, New England Journal of Medicine, 1998) to have accuracy as high as 98%. We compare our hospital's CT accuracy ordered by emergency room (ER) physicians with that of experienced surgeons provided only with the ER history and physical examination in the evaluation of appendicitis. METHODS: All charts of patients 16 years or older with limited CT scans ordered by ER from January 1, 1996, through February 28, 1998, were reviewed. CT scans ordered when appendicitis was not in the differential were excluded from analysis. Pathology and clinical follow-up were criterion standards. Four surgeons reviewed ER history and physical and placed them into one of three categories: appendectomy, observe to rule out appendicitis, or discharge with follow-up (included admitting to another service or treating for another disorder). RESULTS: A total of 526 charts were reviewed; 129 met the criteria for the study. The accuracy of CT scans as used by our ER was not as high as reported in the literature. In addition, surgeon accuracy approached that of the CT scan even without the ability to evaluate the patients in person. Noncontrast CTs were ordered before surgical evaluation in contrast to the Rao protocol, likely reducing their accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Ordering CT scans to evaluate for appendicitis prior to surgical evaluation is of limited value.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2003

What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates appendicitis in the elderly, comparing our findings to those previously published a decade earlier. METHODS: Comparison of appendicitis in the elderly (aged 60 years and older) from 1978 to 1988 with the following 10 years, 1988 to 1998. RESULTS: Overall (1978-1998) 26% of patients presented typically, one third delayed seeking care, with only half diagnosed correctly on admission. Computed tomography (CT) use increased (44% versus rarely in the previous decade). Perforation rates declined (72% first group versus 51% second group) with a concomitant drop in complications from 32% to 21% respectively. Overall, three fourths of complications occurred in patients with perforated appendicitis. Mortality rates remained constant. CONCLUSIONS: Appendicitis in the elderly is a difficult problem with delays in medical care, non-typical presentation resulting in incorrect diagnosis, relatively high rates of perforation often with associated postoperative complications and mortality. A higher index of suspicion with liberal early utilization of CT in uncertain cases may result in more appropriate management.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

Impact of adjunctive testing on the diagnosis and clinical course of patients with acute appendicitis.

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is usually made from the history and physical examination. Recently, abdominal ultrasonography (US), laparoscopy, computerized tomography (CT), and barium enema (BE) have been used in the preoperative evaluation of patients with presumed appendicitis in order to improve the diagnostic accuracy. However, the usefulness of these tests in verifying the diagnosis of appendicitis has not been established. We reviewed the medical records of 203 patients who underwent appendectomy. One hundred patients were surgically treated before 1984 (group I) and 103 patients underwent surgery after 1988 (group II). Patients in group II were more likely to have preoperative US, laparoscopy, CT, or BE (24 in group II versus 3 in group I, p < 0.05). When groups I and II were compared, the rates of perforation (27% versus 20%), normal appendectomy (8% versus 11%), and the interval between admission and operation (12.2 hours versus 10.7 hours) and length of hospitalization (5.0 days versus 5.1 days) were not significantly different. We concluded that although adjunctive testing may be beneficial in selected patients, its routine use in patients suspected of having appendicitis cannot be advocated at present.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

A four-year experience with laparoscopy in the management of appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to determine the influences of laparoscopy in the management and outcome of patients with appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 154 consecutive patients who were treated for suspected appendicitis. The pre-operative diagnosis included appendicitis, right lower quadrant pain of unknown etiology, and generalized peritonitis. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was used in 108 patients, including 70 laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) and 31 LAs converted to open appendectomy (OA). Forty-six patients had OA. The average operating time for LA was 74.3 minutes and 48.8 minutes with OA. Postoperative complications for LA (7%) included 1 trochar wound hemorrhage, 2 wound infections, and 2 intra-abdominal sepsis; and for OA (9%) were 1 post-operative intra-abdominal hemorrhage, 4 wound infections, 1 wound dehiscence, and 1 intra-abdominal sepsis. Post-operative stay for LA averaged 2.5 days and for OA averaged 4.5 days (P = .0049). LA patients had a considerably faster return to work and/or normal activity than OA patients (P = .00065). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy influenced the management of 29% of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. LA resulted in shorter hospitalization and a more rapid return to work and/or normal activity than OA.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Importance of diarrhea as a presenting symptom of appendicitis in very young children.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is an uncommon diagnosis in very young children. It is frequently complicated by delays in diagnosis, perforation, and lengthy hospital stays. OBJECTIVES: To review our recent experience with appendicitis among children younger than 3 years old, and to identify the independent predictors of a prolonged hospital stay. METHODS: A retrospective case series review was performed on all children under age 3 who had an appendectomy for appendicitis between January 1983 and February 1994. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of a prolonged hospital stay. RESULTS: Sixty-three children were identified. Mean age was 2.2 years (range 11 to 35 months). The mean delay from onset of symptoms to presentation was 4.3 days. Fifty-seven percent were initially misdiagnosed. Diarrhea was reported in 33%. Perforation and/or gangrene were found in 84%. Perforation and/or gangrene at laparotomy and a history of diarrhea at presentation were independent predictors of a prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Appendicitis in children under 3 years old is characterized by delays in diagnosis and perforation. A history of diarrhea is an important factor that confuses the diagnosis, prolongs the observation period, and delays appropriate therapy.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed1981

Pitfalls in the use of barium enema in early appendicitis in children.

Appendicitis remains the most common intraabdominal indication for surgery in children. Recently, barium enema has been helpful in increasing the accuracy of diagnosis in difficult cases. Experience with 202 barium enemas in children with abdominal pain entertaining the diagnosis of acute appendicitis revealed some of the problems encountered in using this procedure as a diagnostic tool. Of the 66 children who underwent surgery, there were 32 children who were felt to have a positive barium enema and 31 of these turned out to have acute appendicitis. In the group that had negative barium enemas, there were 3 false negatives and 2 of these children had early perforations by the time of their surgery. The third group were equivocal barium enemas and they pointed out the difficulty in obtaining a normal barium enema in a child who does not have appendicitis. It was felt that the use of barium enema as an adjunct was helpful especially if it were positive, but a negative barium enema could not be relied upon to delay surgery in the child with right lower quadrant peritoneal signs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1986

Discharge planning for children with perforated appendicitis.

Optimal management of children with perforated appendicitis remains a controversial clinical problem. Until very recently, the criteria for hospital discharge on our surgical service included the absence of fever and leukocytosis for a period of 48 hours following completion of antimicrobial therapy, uncomplicated wound healing, a normal rectal examination, and unimpaired gastrointestinal function. With the introduction of cost-containment programs, the necessity for the period of inpatient observation following cessation of antibiotics was questioned. The records of 87 consecutive children with perforated appendicitis were analyzed prospectively in order to determine if our discharge policies were medically sound and cost-effective. Seventy-five patients (86%) recovered uneventfully while 12 children required prolonged hospitalization for management of various postoperative complications. The 12 patients who developed complications were all identifiable early in the postoperative period because of persistent fever, leukocytosis, and elevated band counts. Of the 75 children who recovered uneventfully, all met standard discharge criteria on the final day of antibiotic therapy with the exception of completing the mandatory 48-hour period of inpatient observation. These children were maintained in the hospital a total of 142 additional days following discontinuation of antibiotics. The average cost per patient day for children with perforated appendicitis during the study period was $506.32, which represented unnecessary hospital charges of $71,897.44. It was concluded that inpatient observation following cessation of antibiotic therapy in children who experience an uneventful recovery from perforated appendicitis is neither necessary nor cost-effective.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Appendicitis↗
PubMed1997

Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming the preferred technique for treating acute appendicitis. However, recent literature on adults suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy may increase the risk for postoperative infectious complications in complicated (gangrenous or perforated) cases. This study was undertaken to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in children. METHODS: A retrospective review from two institutions was performed for all children treated operatively for complicated appendicitis from January 1994 through November 1996. RESULTS: Fifty-six cases were identified. Twenty-seven children underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, whereas 22 underwent open appendectomy. Seven children underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Operating times and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the laparoscopic and open groups. Postoperative complications developed in 24 children (42.8%). Complications were more frequent after laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy (56% v 18%, P = .002). A postoperative intraabdominal abscess (IAA) developed in 14 children (25%). An IAA occurred in two children after open appendectomy compared with 11 children after laparoscopic appendectomy (9% v 41%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy should be avoided in children who have complicated appendicitis because of the increased risk for postoperative intraabdominal abscesses. The authors propose a prospective, randomized trial to verify this finding.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1999

The evaluation of technetium 99m-citrate scintigraphy in children with suspected appendicitis.

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the use of technetium (Tc) 99m-citrate scan in 30 children whose diagnoses of appendicitis were unclear. METHODS: There were 17 boys and 13 girls (mean age 10.6 years). Nineteen of 30 patients had appendicitis confirmed at laparotomy and through histological examination, and 11 patients had other causes of acute abdominal pain. RESULTS: Children included in this study were similar with respect to age, duration of symptoms, temperature, white blood cell count, and the incidence of right lower quadrant tenderness. Sixteen children had positive scan for acute appendicitis, but 1 of them had false-positive. Fourteen children had negative scan, but 4 of them had false-negative. The calculated values were 78.9% (15 of 19), 90.9% (10 of 11), 83.3% (25 of 30), 93.7% (15 of 16), and 71.4% (10 of 14) for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prediction, and negative prediction, respectively, in this study. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest the use of 99mTc-citrate scan in children when the diagnosis of appendicitis using other methods is unclear.

Appendicitis↗
PubMed1990

Use of the MANTRELS score in childhood appendicitis: a prospective study of 187 children with abdominal pain.

We report an evaluation of the MANTRELS clinical score in predicting appendicitis in a prospectively studied pediatric population presenting with abdominal pain. One hundred eighty-nine independent episodes from 187 children 2 to 17 years old were studied. For the groups as a whole and for the individual groups less than 16 years old, the score failed to satisfactorily discriminate those with appendicitis from those without. Had the MANTRELS score been used to determine observation and laparotomy in our patients, 21 additional patients would have been unnecessarily hospitalized, and 16 would have been subjected to unnecessary laparotomies. One patient would have received appropriate intervention earlier. In the 40 children 16 and 17 years old, the MANTRELS score adequately distinguished the two groups. A seven-variable discriminant function, derived from stepwise discriminant analysis, performed slightly better but showed essentially the same findings as the MANTRELS score. We believe the MANTRELS score failed to predict appendicitis in younger children because it does not contain variables that allow for separation of appendicitis from the numerous other conditions mimicking it in the pediatric population. The clinician remains the best judge of the acute abdomen in the pediatric age group.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2002

Unenhanced helical CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis changes disposition of patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute appendicitis.

This study sought to determine if obtaining an unenhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (UHCT) scan alters the disposition of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. A convenience sample of 101 patients presenting with a clinical picture suggestive of appendicitis were prospectively enrolled. Emergency physicians (EPs) and general surgeons independently recorded their anticipated disposition of each patient as: discharge, admit for observation, or admit for appendectomy. A UHCT scan was then obtained and the patient's ultimate disposition recorded. EPs altered their dispositions after UHCT scanning in 35 patients (34.7%, 95% CI 25.4% to 44.0%), and general surgeons altered their dispositions in 27 patients (26.7%, 95% CI 18.1% to 35.3%). More patients underwent operative intervention than were originally selected by EPs [14 additional patients, (13.9%, 95% CI 7.1% to 20.6%)] or by surgeons [20 additional patients, (19.8%, 95% CI 12.0% to 27.6%)]. CT scan revealed alternative diagnoses in 20 patients (19.8%). UHCT scanning significantly alters patient disposition, and significantly increases the number of operative interventions performed in patients with suspected appendicitis. UHCT scanning may also identify alternate pathology that clinically mimics appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Surgical evaluation of appendicitis in the new era of radiographic imaging.

Appendicitis remains a common disease with over 250,000 cases in the United States per year. Surgical intervention has been the primary treatment for over a century, and clinical evaluation has been the mainstay for diagnosis of acute appendicitis for decades. Appendiceal imaging modalities have become increasingly popular to assist with the diagnosis of appendicitis, and the surgeon is no longer the sole diagnostician for this disease. Radiologists and emergency medical physicians have entered the arena. This review examines the surgical and radiological literature to evaluate the current atmosphere of how surgeons, radiologists, and emergency physicians interact in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Sonography of acute appendicitis.

Graded compression sonography is an established imaging modality in the clinical setting of acute right lower quadrant pain or to diagnose acute appendicitis because of its easy assessability, noninvasiveness, real-time imaging. However, the ability to accurately diagnose appendicitis can be affected by several factors including operator dependence, deeper-located appendix, and obesity or muscularity of the patient. However, adjuvant techniques utilizing advanced equipment and accumulated operator's experience to conventional graded compression sonography will yield more frequent detection of the vermiform appendix and more accurate results of acute appendicitis on sonography. This article introduces adjuvant techniques and various know-how of real field in the detection of the vermiform appendix and diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

CT diagnosis of a clinically unsuspected acute appendicitis complicating infectious mononucleosis.

Acute appendicitis is a rare complication of infectious mononucleosis (IM). We describe a patient with IM and splenic rupture with a computerized tomography (CT) diagnosis of acute appendicitis during the acute phase of the infectious disease. Diagnostic imaging features of acute appendicitis were found on an abdominal CT performed for the evaluation of postoperative fever. Histologic examination confirmed the CT diagnosis of the clinically unsuspected acute appendicitis. Our case is unique both for the rarity of this complication and the lack of clinical symptoms.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT.

Fifty-three patients with 38 cases of perforated appendicitis and 15 cases of appendicitis without perforation were evaluated based on the computed tomography (CT) appearances of appendiceal diameter, phlegmon, abscess, extraluminal air, appendiceal wall enhancement, lateroconal fascial thickening, appendicolith, bowel wall thickening, ascites, ileal wall enhancement, peritoneal enhancement, periappendiceal fluid, omental haziness, retrocecal appendix, intraluminal air, and the combination of intraluminal air and appendicolith. The result of appendiceal diameter was compared using two-sample Student's t test, and the other CT findings were analyzed by Fisher's Exact Test. Our results showed that appendix was larger in caliber in perforated appendix (P< .05). Direct CT signs (i.e., phlegmon, abscess, and extraluminal air) were more specific for perforated appendicitis (P< .05). Indirect signs (bowel wall thickening, ascites, ileal wall enhancement, intraluminal air, and combined intraluminal air and appendicolith) were also found in higher incidence in appendiceal perforation (P< .05). Appendiceal enlargement and ileal wall enhancement were the two predominant findings in one case of perforation. We concluded that direct and indirect CT appearances can differentiate appendicitis with and without perforation. Indirect signs may be helpful in difficult case.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of primary wound closure versus open wound management in perforated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Open wound management has long been the most common practice after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Primary closure, however, has recently been advocated to reduce cost and morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the results of open wound management and primary wound closure in adult patients (age, > or =15 years) with perforated appendicitis. METHODS: Hospital records of 390 patients (age, > or =15 years) who underwent appendectomy between January 2002 and December 2004 were reviewed to identify surgical wound infection (SWI) and pathologic diagnosis. Perforated appendicitis was the indication for appendectomy in 65 of these patients. The incision wounds in these 65 patients were closed primarily in 41 and left open at the end of the operation in 24. The duration of symptoms, white blood cell count, operative time, incidence of SWI, length of stay (LOS) and readmission rate were compared between patients with these two different methods of wound management. RESULTS: Patients whose wounds were closed primarily had a higher incidence of SWI (43.9% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001) and longer LOS (10 days vs. 7.9 days, p = 0.044). The readmission rate was also higher for patients whose wounds were closed primarily; however, this difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Open wound management may be preferable to primary wound closure for perforated appendicitis in adults because of a lower incidence of SWI and a shorter LOS. Randomized clinical trials, however, are needed to establish these findings.

Adolescent↗