Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “replication fork stability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Regulation of DNA replication machinery by Mrc1 in fission yeast.

Faithful replication of chromosomes is crucial to genome integrity. In yeast, the ORC binds replication origins throughout the cell cycle. However, Cdc45 binds these before S-phase, and, during replication, it moves along the DNA with MCM helicase. When replication progression is inhibited, checkpoint regulation is believed to stabilize the replication fork; the detailed mechanism, however, remains unclear. To examine the relationship between replication initiation and elongation defects and the response to replication elongation block, we used fission yeast mutants of Orc1 and Cdc45--orp1-4 and sna41-928, respectively--at their respective semipermissive temperatures with regard to BrdU incorporation. Both orp1 and sna41 cells exhibited HU hypersensitivity in the absence of Chk1, a DNA damage checkpoint kinase, and were defective in full activation of Cds1, a replication checkpoint kinase, indicating that normal replication is required for Cds1 activation. Mrc1 is required to activate Cds1 and prevent the replication machinery from uncoupling from DNA synthesis. We observed that, while either the orp1 or the sna41 mutation partially suppressed HU sensitivity of cds1 cells, sna41 specifically suppressed that of mrc1 cells. Interestingly, sna41 alleviated the defect in recovery from HU arrest without increasing Cds1 activity. In addition to sna41, specific mutations of MCM suppressed the HU sensitivity of mrc1 cells. Thus, during elongation, Mrc1 may negatively regulate Cdc45 and MCM helicase to render stalled forks capable of resuming replication.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Replication-dependent DNA damage response triggered by roscovitine induces an uncoupling of DNA replication proteins.

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor roscovitine is under evaluation in clinical trials for its antiproliferative properties. Roscovitine arrests cell cycle progression in G(1) and in G(2) phase by inhibiting CDK2 and CDK1, and possibly CDK7 and CDK9. However, the effects of CDK2 inhibition in S-phase cells have been not fully investigated. Here, we show that a short-term treatment with roscovitine is sufficient to inhibit DNA synthesis, and to activate a DNA damage checkpoint response, as indicated by phosphorylation of p53-Ser15, replication protein A, and histone H2AX. Analysis of DNA replication proteins loaded onto DNA during S phase showed that the amount of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a cofactor of DNA replication enzymes, was significantly reduced by roscovitine. In contrast, chromatin-bound levels of DNA polymerase delta, DNA ligase I and CDK2, were stabilized. Checkpoint inhibition with caffeine could rescue PCNA disassembly only partially, pointing to additional effects due to CDK2 inhibition and the presence of replication stress. These results suggest that in S-phase cells, roscovitine induces checkpoint-dependent and -independent effects, leading to stabilization of replication forks and an uncoupling between PCNA and PCNA-interacting proteins.

Cell Proliferation↗
PubMed2003

RecO acts with RecF and RecR to protect and maintain replication forks blocked by UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli.

In Escherichia coli, recF and recR are required to stabilize and maintain replication forks arrested by UV-induced DNA damage. In the absence of RecF, replication fails to recover, and the nascent lagging strand of the arrested replication fork is extensively degraded by the RecQ helicase and RecJ nuclease. recO mutants are epistatic with recF and recR with respect to recombination and survival assays after DNA damage. In this study, we show that RecO functions with RecF and RecR to protect the nascent lagging strand of arrested replication forks after UV-irradiation. In the absence of RecO, the nascent DNA at arrested replication forks is extensively degraded and replication fails to recover. The extent of nascent DNA degradation is equivalent in single, double, or triple mutants of recF, recO, or recR, and the degradation is dependent upon RecJ and RecQ functions. Because RecF has been shown to protect the nascent lagging strand from degradation, these observations indicate that RecR and RecO function with RecF to protect the same nascent strand of the arrested replication fork and are likely to act at a common point during the recovery process. We discuss these results in relation to the biochemical and cellular properties of RecF, RecO, and RecR and their potential role in loading RecA filaments to maintain the replication fork structure after the arrest of replication by UV-induced DNA damage.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Checkpoint functions are required for normal S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RCAF- and CAF-I-defective mutants.

The chromatin-assembly factor I (CAF-I) and the replication-coupling assembly factor (RCAF) complexes function in chromatin assembly during DNA replication and repair and play a role in the maintenance of genome stability. Here, we have investigated their role in checkpoints and S-phase progression. FACS analysis of mutants lacking Asf1 or Cac1 as well as various checkpoint proteins indicated that normal rates of S-phase progression in asf1 mutants have a strong requirement for replication checkpoint proteins, whereas normal S-phase progression in cac1 mutants has only a weak requirement for either replication or DNA-damage checkpoint proteins. Furthermore, asf1 mutants had high levels of Ddc2.GFP foci that were further increased in asf1 dun1 double mutants consistent with a requirement for checkpoint proteins in S-phase progression in asf1 mutants, whereas cac1 mutants had much lower levels of Ddc2.GFP foci that were not increased by a dun1 mutation. Our data suggest that RCAF defects lead to unstable replication forks that are then stabilized by replication checkpoint proteins, whereas CAF-I defects likely cause different types of DNA damage.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2002

Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG.

Chromosomal duplication faces many blocks to replication fork progression that could destabilize the genome and prove fatal if not overcome. Overcoming such blocks requires interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair. The RecG protein of Escherichia coli promotes rescue of damaged forks by catalysing their unwinding and conversion to Holliday junctions. Subsequent processing of this structure allows repair or bypass of the fork block, enabling replication to resume without recourse to potentially mutagenic translesion synthesis or recombination. Such direct rescue of stalled forks might help safeguard genome integrity in all organisms.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2006

GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks.

The components of the replisome that preserve genomic stability by controlling the progression of eukaryotic DNA replication forks are poorly understood. Here, we show that the GINS (go ichi ni san) complex allows the MCM (minichromosome maintenance) helicase to interact with key regulatory proteins in large replisome progression complexes (RPCs) that are assembled during initiation and disassembled at the end of S phase. RPC components include the essential initiation and elongation factor, Cdc45, the checkpoint mediator Mrc1, the Tof1-Csm3 complex that allows replication forks to pause at protein-DNA barriers, the histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) and Ctf4, which helps to establish sister chromatid cohesion. RPCs also interact with Mcm10 and topoisomerase I. During initiation, GINS is essential for a specific subset of RPC proteins to interact with MCM. GINS is also important for the normal progression of DNA replication forks, and we show that it is required after initiation to maintain the association between MCM and Cdc45 within RPCs.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed1981

Mutation induction in Haemophilus influenzae by ICR-191. II. Role of DNA replication and repair.

Evidence is presented to show that presumptive frameshift mutations induced in Haemophilus influenzae by ICR-191 are fixed very rapidly, essentially at the time of treatment. DNA synthesis during treatment is essential for fixation, but DNA synthesis after treatment has no effect. The conclusion is drawn that the mutagen acts at the replication fork, possibly to stabilize misannealings arising in association with the discontinuities in the newly synthesized DNA. These results agree with earlier results on Escherichia coli showing that ICR-191 produces peak mutation frequencies in synchronized cultures at times when the replication fork has reached the locus being studied. They are in sharp contrast to the earlier results in H. influenzae with nitroso compounds and hydrazine that suggest these agents produce randomly distributed, reparable pre-mutational damage that still can be fixed (converted to final mutation) for some time after treatment when the replication fork reaches them. No evidence for such persistent pre-mutational lesions was found with ICR-191. A defect in incision appeared to have very little influence on mutation induction by ICR-191 though it caused much more lethality. The interpretation of the mutation data was made somewhat uncertain, however, by an unexplained plating-density effect on the expression of the mutants in this strain. In contrast, incision deficiencies in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium have been reported to cause a large increase in mutation induction and to allow lesions at some distance from the replication fork to produce mutations.

DNA Repair↗
PubMed2005

Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1, the Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, associates with Swi1, a component of the replication fork protection complex.

The protein kinase Hsk1 is essential for DNA replication in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. It associates with Dfp1/Him1 to form an active complex equivalent to the Cdc7-Dbf4 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Swi1 and Swi3 are subunits of the replication fork protection complex in S. pombe that is homologous to the Tof1-Csm3 complex in S. cerevisiae. The fork protection complex helps to preserve the integrity of stalled replication forks and is important for activation of the checkpoint protein kinase Cds1 in response to fork arrest. Here we describe physical and genetic interactions involving Swi1 and Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1. Dfp1/Him1 was identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen with Swi1. Hsk1 and Dfp1/Him1 both co-immunoprecipitate with Swi1. Swi1 is required for growth of a temperature-sensitive hsk1 (hsk1ts) mutant at its semi-permissive temperature. Hsk1ts cells accumulate Rad22 (Rad52 homologue) DNA repair foci at the permissive temperature, as previously observed in swi1 cells, indicating that abnormal single-stranded DNA regions form near the replication fork in hsk1ts cells. hsk1ts cells were also unable to properly delay S-phase progression in the presence of a DNA alkylating agent and were partially defective in mating type switching. These data suggest that Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1 and Swi1-Swi3 complexes have interrelated roles in stabilization of arrested replication forks.

Alkylating Agents↗
PubMed1999

Recovery of DNA replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli requires both excision repair and recF protein function.

After UV doses that disrupt DNA replication, the recovery of replication at replication forks in Escherichia coli requires a functional copy of the recF gene. In recF mutants, replication fails to recover and extensive degradation of the nascent DNA occurs, suggesting that recF function is needed to stabilize the disrupted replication forks and facilitate the process of recovery. We show here that the ability of recF to promote the recovery of replication requires that the disrupting lesions be removed. In the absence of excision repair, recF+ cells protect the nascent DNA at replication forks, but replication does not resume. The classical view is that recombination proteins operate in pathways that are independent from DNA repair, and therefore the functions of Rec proteins have been studied in repair-deficient cells. However, mutations in either uvr or recF result in failure to recover replication at UV doses from which wild-type cells recover efficiently, suggesting that recF and excision repair contribute to a common pathway in the recovery of replication.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2003

DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli.

DNA lesions that block replication are a primary cause of rearrangements, mutations, and lethality in all cells. After ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli, replication recovery requires RecA and several other recF pathway proteins. To characterize the mechanism by which lesion-blocked replication forks recover, we used two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis to show that replication-blocking DNA lesions induce a transient reversal of the replication fork in vivo. The reversed replication fork intermediate is stabilized by RecA and RecF and is degraded by the RecQ-RecJ helicase-nuclease when these proteins are absent. We propose that fork regression allows repair enzymes to gain access to the replication-blocking lesion, allowing processive replication to resume once the blocking lesion is removed.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Levels of MCM4 phosphorylation and DNA synthesis in DNA replication block checkpoint control.

Blockage of a DNA replication fork movement not only stabilizes the fork structure but also prevents initiation of DNA replication. We reported that MCM4, a subunit of a putative replicative DNA helicase, is extensively phosphorylated in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU) or after exposure to UV irradiation. Here we examined the relationship between levels of MCM4 phosphorylation and DNA synthesis during DNA replication checkpoint control and after release of the control. The results suggest that there is roughly inverse correlation between these two levels; namely the higher the level of MCM4 phosphorylation, the lower the level of DNA synthesis. The presence of HU or UV irradiation can stimulate phosphorylation at several cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) sites in MCM4, which can lead to inhibition of MCM4/6/7 helicase activity. These results are consistent with the notion that the phosphorylation of MCM4 is involved in regulation of DNA synthesis in the checkpoint control.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2006

p21CDKN1A allows the repair of replication-mediated DNA double-strand breaks induced by topoisomerase I and is inactivated by the checkpoint kinase inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine.

This study provides evidence for the importance of p21(CDKN1A) for the repair of replication-mediated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by topoisomerase I. We report that defects of p21(CDKN1A) and p53 enhance camptothecin-induced histone H2AX phosphorylation (gammaH2AX), a marker for DNA DSBs. In human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells with wild-type (wt) p53, gammaH2AX reverses after camptothecin removal. By contrast, gammaH2AX increases after camptothecin removal in HCT116 cells deficient for p53 (p53-/-) or p21(CDKN1A) (p21-/-) as the cells reach the late-S and G2 phases. Since p21-/- cells exhibit similar S-phase arrest as wt cells in response to camptothecin and aphidicolin does not abrogate the enhanced gammaH2AX formation in p21-/- cells, we conclude that enhanced gammaH2AX formation in p21-/- cells is not due to re-replication. The cell cycle checkpoint abrogator and Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) also increases camptothecin-induced gammaH2AX formation and inhibits camptothecin-induced p21(CDKN1A) upregulation in HCT116 wt cells. TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling) assays demonstrate that gammaH2AX formation in late S and G2 cells following CPT treatment corresponds to DNA breaks. However, these breaks are not related to apoptotic DNA fragmentation. We propose that p21(CDKN1A) prevents the collapse of replication forks damaged by stabilized topoisomerase I cleavage complexes.

Aphidicolin↗
PubMed2005

Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase.

S-phase cells overcome chromosome lesions through replication-coupled recombination processes that seem to be assisted by recombination-dependent DNA structures and/or replication-related sister chromatid junctions. RecQ helicases, including yeast Sgs1 and human BLM, have been implicated in both replication and recombination and protect genome integrity by preventing unscheduled mitotic recombination events. We have studied the RecQ helicase-mediated mechanisms controlling genome stability by analyzing replication forks encountering a damaged template in sgs1 cells. We show that, in sgs1 mutants, recombination-dependent cruciform structures accumulate at damaged forks. Their accumulation requires Rad51 protein, is counteracted by Srs2 DNA helicase, and does not prevent fork movement. Sgs1, but not Srs2, promotes resolution of these recombination intermediates. A functional Rad53 checkpoint kinase that is known to protect the integrity of the sister chromatid junctions is required for the accumulation of recombination intermediates in sgs1 mutants. Finally, top3 and top3 sgs1 mutants accumulate the same structures as sgs1 cells. We suggest that, in sgs1 cells, the unscheduled accumulation of Rad51-dependent cruciform structures at damaged forks result from defective maturation of recombination-dependent intermediates that originate from the replication-related sister chromatid junctions. Our findings might contribute to explaining some of the recombination defects of BLM cells.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2005

DNA binding by the substrate specificity (wedge) domain of RecG helicase suggests a role in processivity.

RecG differs from most helicases acting on branched DNA in that it is thought to catalyze unwinding via translocation of a monomer on dsDNA, with a wedge domain facilitating strand separation. Conserved phenylalanines in the wedge are shown to be critical for DNA binding. When detached from the helicase domains, the wedge bound a Holliday junction with high affinity but failed to bind a replication fork structure. Further stabilizing contacts are identified in full-length RecG, which may explain fork binding. Detached from the wedge, the helicase region unwound junctions but had extremely low substrate affinity, arguing against the "classical inchworm" mode of translocation. We propose that the processivity of RecG on branched DNA substrates is dependent on the ability of the wedge to establish strong binding at the branch point. This keeps the helicase motor in contact with the substrate, enabling it to drive dsDNA translocation with high efficiency.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMedDate not supplied

FHA domain-mediated DNA checkpoint regulation of Rad53.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 is a protein kinase central to the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint signaling pathways. In addition to its catalytic domain, Rad53 contains two forkhead homology-associated (FHA) domains (FHA1 and FHA2), which are phosphopeptide binding domains. The Rad53 FHA domains are proposed to mediate the interaction of Rad53 with both upstream and downstream branches of the DNA checkpoint signaling pathways. Here we show that concurrent mutation of Rad53 FHA1 and FHA2 causes DNA checkpoint defects approaching that of inactivation or loss of RAD53 itself. Both FHA1 and FHA2 are required for the robust activation of Rad53 by the RAD9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway, while an intact FHA1 or FHA2 allows the activation of Rad53 in response to replication block. Mutation of Rad53 FHA1 causes the persistent activation of the RAD9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway in response to replicational stress, suggesting that the RAD53-dependent stabilization of stalled replication forks functions through FHA1. Rad53 FHA1 is also required for the phosphorylation-dependent association of Rad53 with the chromatin assembly factor Asf1, although Asf1 itself is apparently not required for the prevention of DNA damage in response to replication block.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Topoisomerase I-DNA complex stability induced by camptothecins and its role in drug activity.

The mechanism of cytotoxicity of the camptothecin family of antitumor drugs is thought to be the consequence of a collision between moving replication forks and camptothecin-stabilized cleavable DNA-topoisomerase I complexes. One property of camptothecin analogs relevant to their potent antitumor activity is the slow reversal of the cleavable complexes formed with these drugs. The persistence of cleavable complexes with time may be an essential property for increasing the likelihood of a collision between the replication fork and a cleavable complex, giving rise to lethal DNA lesions. In this paper, we examined a number of camptothecin analogs forming cleavable complexes with distinctly different stabilities. Absolute reaction rate analysis was carried out for each derivative. Our results indicate that the stability of the cleavable complex is dominated by the activation entropy (DeltaS++) of the reversal process. We measured the relative lipophilicity of the CPT analogs by reverse-phase HPLC, but the DeltaS++ of complex reversal is not directly related to the lipophilicity of the CPT analog being used. We suggest that solvent ordering around the 7- through 10-position of the CPT ring may be responsible for reversal rate's dependence on DeltaS++. We demonstrate that the cleavable complex stability conferred by each camptothecin analog is directly correlated with the induction of apoptosis and cytotoxicity to tumor cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork.

Eukaryotic cells regulate the progression and integrity of DNA replication forks to maintain genomic stability and couple DNA synthesis to other processes. The budding yeast proteins Mrc1 and Tof1 associate with the putative MCM-Cdc45 helicase and limit progression of the replisome when nucleotides are depleted, and the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 stabilize such stalled forks and prevent disassembly of the replisome. Forks also pause transiently during unperturbed chromosome replication, at sites where nonnucleosomal proteins bind DNA tightly. We describe a method for inducing prolonged pausing of forks at protein barriers assembled at unique sites on a yeast chromosome, allowing us to examine for the first time the effects of pausing upon replisome integrity. We show that paused forks maintain an intact replisome that contains Mrc1, Tof1, MCM-Cdc45, GINS, and DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and that recruits the Rrm3 helicase. Surprisingly, pausing does not require Mrc1, although Tof1 and Csm3 are both important. In addition, the integrity of the paused forks does not require Mec1, Rad53, or recombination. We also show that paused forks at analogous barriers in the rDNA are regulated similarly. These data indicate that paused and stalled eukaryotic replisomes resemble each other but are regulated differently.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Esc4/Rtt107 and the control of recombination during replication.

When replication forks stall during DNA synthesis, cells respond by assembling multi-protein complexes to control the various pathways that stabilize the replication machinery, repair the replication fork, and facilitate the reinitiation of processive DNA synthesis. Increasing evidence suggests that cells have evolved scaffolding proteins to orchestrate and control the assembly of these repair complexes, typified in mammalian cells by several BRCT-motif containing proteins, such as Brca1, Xrcc1, and 53BP1. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Esc4 contains six such BRCT domains and is required for the most efficient response to a variety of agents that damage DNA. We show that Esc4 interacts with several proteins involved in the repair and processing of stalled or collapsed replication forks, including the recombination protein Rad55. However, the function of Esc4 does not appear to be restricted to a Rad55-dependent process, as we observed an increase in sensitivity to the DNA alkylating agent methane methylsulfonate (MMS) in a esc4Deltarad55Delta mutant, as well as in double mutants of esc4Delta and other recombination genes, compared to the corresponding single mutants. In addition, we show that Esc4 forms multiple nuclear foci in response to treatment with MMS. Similar behavior is also observed in the absence of damage when either of the S-phase checkpoint proteins, Tof1 or Mrc1, is deleted. Thus, we propose that Esc4 associates with ssDNA of stalled forks and acts as a scaffolding protein to recruit and/or modulate the function of other proteins required to reinitiate DNA synthesis.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗