Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Detection of psychological distress by practice nurses in general practice.

BACKGROUND: The general practitioner (GP) has traditionally been the first port of call for people with psychiatric morbidity but increasingly other members of the primary care team see the patients first, particularly practice nurses. The numbers and roles of practice nurses have expanded greatly over the past decade and it is important that practice nurses are able to recognize patients with psychiatric morbidity. This paper reports a study to determine the abilities of 24 practice nurses to detect psychiatric morbidity in patients attending their clinics. METHODS: Twenty-four practices were randomly selected from 41 practices recruited from South London and Kent. One nurse per practice took part in the study. Patients were asked to complete a 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) while waiting for their appointment with the practice nurse. Following their consultation, the practice nurse rated the patients' level of psychological distress on a five-point rating scale. RESULTS: The response rate of patients was 97% (N= 1710). The GHQ case rate was 36%. The mean detection rate by practice nurses when identifying significant distress was 16% (between nurse variation, 0% to 61%). The mean specificity was 96% (variation 77% to 100%). A second analysis, changing the nurse criterion to recognition of distress increased the mean sensitivity rate to 58% (variation 31% to 84%) but the mean specificity rate decreased to 66% (variation 26% to 95%). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that practice nurses' caseloads include a high proportion of patients with psychiatric morbidity and that agreement with the GHQ classification of psychiatric morbidity is modest. Therefore, training in detection will be crucial for the nurses.

Adolescent↗

General practice workload during normal working hours in training and non-training practices.

The aim of this study was to design and test a form to review workload in training and non-training practices. The study was conducted in the Oxford, Reading and Milton Keynes districts over a period of one week and involved 31 training and 21 non-training practices consisting of 156 and 66 doctors, respectively. Doctors in training practices (excluding trainees) spent a mean of one hour less per week in contact with their patients than doctors in non-training practices. Doctors in training practices spent approximately the same time per week on administration as those in non-training practices, one hour more in both meetings and non-practice work and almost two hours more in training and studying. The mean total practice workload per doctor in training practices was two hours more than in non-training practices and, when non-practice work was included, the difference increased to three hours. Compared with other doctors, trainees saw fewer patients in the surgery, in clinics and on visits, but spent more time on studying and training. This study produced broadly similar results to previous surveys, although doctors in the present study saw fewer patients each week and spent more time with each patient than in other studies.

Data Collection↗

[The practice nurse in British Family practice. Lessons for Dutch experiments].

In the Netherlands, experiments are taking place in which nurses work in general practice with physicians. In the United Kingdom, so-called practice nurses have been working in general practice since the 1960's. In this article, the experiences in the United Kingdom with the practice nurse are outlined. The focus is on the lessons that can be learned from these experiences. In the United Kingdom, the majority of practice nurses are employed by general practitioners. The most important reason for introducing nurses into the general practice setting was to decrease the physicians' workload. The practice nurse in the United Kingdom has evolved from a 'cheap, task-oriented practice assistant' to a more or less autonomous colleague of the general practitioner. The practice nurses' activities vary greatly. Problems encountered in the United Kingdom primarily concern the lack of training, the absence of a clear definition of the function and responsibilities and the problems associated with working conditions which result from the employment contract with a specific general practitioner. The previously mentioned Dutch experiments show a great deal of variation in terms of the nurses' activities and their position within general practice. Consequently, the development of a clear definition of the function and an adequate training programme are also difficult in the Dutch situation. An additional point of consideration for the Dutch situation is the difference in tasks and responsibilities between the practice nurse and other nurses employed in primary care settings.

Clinical Competence↗

Valuing both critical and creative thinking in clinical practice: narrowing the research-practice gap?

BACKGROUND: Nurturing critical thinking skills in the classroom is considered an important educational activity. It is believed that critical thinking skills are transferable and that they can be applied in practice when appraising, evaluating and implementing research. That more nurses than ever before have been judged academically knowledgeable in research has not guaranteed the transfer of such knowledge to practice. AIM OF THE PAPER: This paper discusses some of the reasons for the failure to narrow the gap between research and practice. In particular we argue that, if nurses are encouraged to develop creative and generative thinking alongside their critical thinking skills, then the art of nursing will have fuller representation in education, research and practice. DISCUSSION: The successful development of critical thinking skills for academic purposes does not necessarily mean that these skills are used in practice in relation either to research or clinical decision-making. This suggests that the transferability of critical thinking skills is less than straightforward. Indeed, there has been little narrowing of the research-practice gap since students started to learn critical thinking for academic purposes. However, we propose that thinking skills can be encouraged in the context of practice and that regular educational events, such as journal clubs, can contribute to developing critical thinking in the practice environment. CONCLUSIONS: The research-practice gap will reduce only if research becomes part of practitioners' ideology, which includes the art and science of nursing. Critical and creative thinking are prerequisites to narrowing the disjuncture between research and practice, and we suggest that educators and practitioners explore structured ways of meeting together to appraise literature as a possible means of making use of their thinking and knowledge in clinical practice.

Clinical Competence↗

Physician practice styles and patient outcomes: differences between family practice and general internal medicine.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared patient health status, patient satisfaction, and physician practice style between family practice and internal medicine. METHODS: New adult patients (n = 509) were prospectively and randomly assigned to family practice or internal medicine clinics at a university medical center and followed for 1 year of care. Practice styles were characterized by the Davis Observation Code. Self-reported health status (Medical Outcomes Study, Short Form-36) and patient satisfaction also were measured. RESULTS: There were no significantly different changes in self-reported health status or patient satisfaction between family practice and internal medicine physicians during the course of the study. Family practice initial encounters, however, were characterized by a style placing greater relative emphasis on health behavior and counseling, whereas internists used a more technical style. Improved health status scores after treatment were predicted by a practice style emphasis on counseling, whereas improvements in patient satisfaction scores were predicted by a style of care stressing patient activation. Although this is the first known randomized trial studying this issue, the conclusions are limited by a 38% loss of patients from enrollment to care and a loss of 18% at the 1-year follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in practice styles between family physicians and internists; however, it was the physician's behavior, not specialty per se, that affected patient outcomes. A practice style emphasizing psychosocial aspects of care was predictive of improvements in patient health status, whereas a practice style emphasizing patient activation was predictive of improvements in patient satisfaction.

Adult↗

A strategy to increase the number of urban family practice resident physicians who enter rural practice.

Physician geographic maldistribution is a problem in the United States health care system. Innovative strategies are needed to entice resident family physicians training in the larger, more numerous suburban and urban training programs to practice in rural areas upon completing their training. This paper describes a strategy used at St. Elizabeth Medical Center Family Practice Residency Program, Dayton, OH, to encourage rural practice. In the St. Elizabeth plan, the interested family practice resident moonlights in a rural practice provided by the local county hospital. The county medical staff covers the resident physician's practice during the frequent absences. The residency program faculty provide on-site supervision, telephone back-up coverage, and practice consultation. The county hospital provides billing services; the resident physician retains 100 percent of collections. The resident physician gains exposure to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed in rural practice. Upon completion of residency training, the physician remains in practice and is not required to pay back any expenses incurred by the hospital. Two resident physicians participate currently; three others have expressed interest in practicing in the community. A similar plan might work in parts of the United States where, like Ohio, training programs and rural communities are not far apart.

Family Practice↗

Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether locally developed guidelines on asthma and diabetes disseminated through practice based education improve quality of care in non-training, inner city general practices. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with each practice receiving one set of guidelines but providing data on the management of both conditions. SUBJECTS: 24 inner city, non-training general practices. SETTING: East London. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recording of key variables in patient records (asthma: peak flow rate, review of inhaler technique, review of asthma symptoms, prophylaxis, occupation, and smoking habit; diabetes: blood glucose concentration, glycaemic control, funduscopy, feet examination, weight, and smoking habit); size of practice disease registers; prescribing in asthma; and use of structured consultation "prompts." RESULTS: In practices receiving diabetes guidelines, significant improvements in recording were seen for all seven diabetes variables. Both groups of practices showed improved recording of review of inhaler technique, smoking habit, and review of asthma symptoms. In practices receiving asthma guidelines, further improvement was seen only in recording of review of inhaler technique and quality of prescribing in asthma. Sizes of disease registers were unchanged. The use of structured prompts was associated with improved recording of four of seven variables on diabetes and all six variables on asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Local guidelines disseminated via practice based education improve the management of diabetes and possibly of asthma in inner city, non-training practices. The use of simple prompts may enhance this improvement.

Adult↗

Physician practice style patterns with established patients: determinants and differences between family practice and general internal medicine residents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This paper examines the practice style patterns of family practice and internal medicine residents for established patient visits. METHODS: New adult patients (n = 509) were prospectively and randomly assigned to family practice or internal medicine clinics at a university medical center and followed for 1 year of care by resident physicians. Initial and return visits were videotaped, and physician practice styles were analyzed using the Davis Observation Code (DOC). RESULTS: Resident physicians' practice styles with established patients during return visits were associated with various factors, depending on the DOC cluster of behaviors studied. These factors include patient gender, age, income, physical and mental health status, level of pain, number of return visits, and physician practice style displayed during the initial encounter. Family practice return visits had a greater emphasis on preventive services and counseling, compared with internal medicine return visits. Internists spent more visit time using technically oriented behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Patient variables, as well as baseline physician behavior, have an important influence on physician practice styles during return patient visits. There are measurable differences in the established practice styles between family practice and internal medicine resident physicians, which may reflect differences in professional training programs.

Adult↗

Relationship between practice organization and cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Research findings suggest that the level of cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice is not yet optimal. Several studies indicate a relation between the organization of cardiovascular disease prevention at practice level and cardiovascular risk factor recording. AIM: To explore the relation between the organization of cardiovascular disease prevention and risk factor recording in general practice. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data on adherence to selected practice guidelines and on cardiovascular risk factor recording from 95 general practices. Practice guidelines were developed beforehand in a consensus procedure. Adherence was assessed by means of a questionnaire and practice observations. Risk factor recording was assessed by an audit of 50 medical records per practice. RESULTS: Factor analysis of risk factor recording revealed three dimensions explaining 76% of the variance: recording of health-related behaviour, recording of clinical parameters, and recording of medical background parameters. Adherence to the guideline 'proactively invite patients to attend for assessment of cardiovascular risk' was related to a higher recording level in all three dimensions. Practice characteristics did not show a consistent relationship to the level of risk factor recording. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the presence of a system of proactive invitation was related to the recording of cardiovascular risk factors in medical records in general practice.

Adult↗

Using practice genograms to understand and describe practice configurations.

BACKGROUND: Demands for change in medical practices are coming from multiple sources. Since interventions to change clinical practice continue to have limited success, understanding the functional structure of primary care practices and the dynamics of providing care have become increasingly important. METHODS: To portray and understand the primary care office system, we developed "practice genograms" that describe practice participants and their relationships with each other. Formal organizational structure is evaluated using family systems theory and family of origin genogram techniques. RESULTS: Practice genograms provided a more dynamic, relational model than the organizational chart and promoted identification of relationship strengths and weaknesses within a practice the same way that family genograms identify these characteristics in a family system. CONCLUSIONS: Research implications for the use of the practice genogram include enhanced data gathering, increased understanding of the complexity of practices as adaptive systems, and increased understanding of current and potential approaches to changing practices.

Family Practice↗

Clinical practice guidelines. New-to-practice family physicians' attitudes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines of a group of family physicians who had recently entered practice in Ontario, and to compare them with the attitudes of a group of internists from the United States. DESIGN: Mailed questionnaire survey of all members of a defined cohort. SETTING: Ontario family practices. PARTICIPANTS: Certificants of the College of Family Physicians of Canada who received certification in 1989, 1990, and 1991 and who were practising in Ontario. Of 564-cohort members, 395 (70%) responded. Men (184) and women (211) responded at the same rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels of agreement with 10 descriptive statements about practice guidelines and analyses of variance of these responses for several physician characteristics. RESULTS: Of respondents in independent practice, 80% were in group practice. Women were more likely to have chosen group practice, in which they were more likely to use practice guidelines than men. Generally favourable attitudes toward guidelines were observed. Physician characteristics occasionally influenced agreement with the descriptors. The pattern of agreement was similar to that noted in the study of American internists, but, in general, Ontario physicians were more supportive. CONCLUSIONS: This group of relatively new-to-practice Ontario family physicians shows little resistance to guidelines and appears to read less threat of external control in them than does the US group.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

The practice characterization model: the importance of organizational life cycles and targeted interventions in general medical practice.

In response to a climate of constant change and increasing demand for services, general practice in the UK has undergone significant modification over the last 10 years. It has become a multi-disciplinary organisation encouraged by funding bodies to plan for service delivery using a more structured team based approach. In Tayside in 1996, practices were charged with producing formal Practice Development Plans (PDPs) which would focus on priority areas aligned with the Health Boards own strategic plan--those were teamwork, information management and technology, and clinical service delivery. The University of Dundee's Department of General Practice successfully applied for funding to develop ways of facilitating practices so that they could a) identify their own development priorities, and b) plan and implement action and learning to see these priorities through. Using action research methodology, the project attempted to create a climate for change, provide support and training to see the changes implemented, and ensure commitment to the changes from all members of the practice team. The Facilitator adopted a flexible style varying her role between expert, guide and support. Analysis of progress made by different practices, coupled with the Facilitator's in depth knowledge of them, suggested the importance of certain key aspects of practice organisation and culture. A practice characterisation model identified practices which were stable, currently coping, proactive and ready to face the challenge of change as best placed to engage in a full scale development programme. Other profiles suggested a range of alternative interventions as more likely to be acceptable and productive.

Data Collection↗

The impact of practice setting and financial incentives on career satisfaction and perceived practice limitations among surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To study how practice setting and financial incentives affect career satisfaction and perceived impact on practice in surgery. METHODS: Data are from the Community Tracking Study (CTS) physician survey, a national survey of active physicians in the United States fielded between August 1996 and August 1997. Surveys with 1,738 practicing surgeons were completed. To be eligible, surgeons had to have completed their medical training (which excludes residents, interns, or fellows), be practicing in the contiguous United States, and be providing direct patient care for at least 20 hours per week. The dependent variables measured are career dissatisfaction and perceived limitations/pressures on time spent with patients, clinical freedom, income, and continuity. The dependent variables are regressed on practice setting, percentage of managed care practice revenue, individual financial incentives, age group, gender, international medical graduate, and board certification. RESULTS: Working in a small practice is the strongest predictor of career dissatisfaction, with about twice the adjusted rate of career dissatisfaction (26%) than other practice settings (13% in group practices, 16% in staff-model HMOs, 9% in medical schools, 18% in hospitals). Managed care plays a much smaller role; an increase in the dependence on managed care equivalent to the difference between 25th and 75th percentile only increases career dissatisfaction by 3 percentage points. Surgeons in solo or two physician practices are also more likely than surgeons in other settings to report that income pressure and limitations on clinical freedom and patient continuity compromise quality of care.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Practice locations of family practice residency graduates.

The purpose of this study was to examine the practice location patterns of 1970-1978 graduates of family practice residency programs. Comparisons were made between the number of graduates practicing in a region in 1979 with the number of all graduates during 1970-1978 from family practice residency programs in that region and with the number of all graduates from medical schools in that region who eventually completed family practice residencies elsewhere. The Middle Atlantic and West North Central regions showed marked decreases, while the Mountain, Pacific, and New England regions showed increases. The majority practiced more than 100 miles from their residency program. Most respondents practicing in a nonmetropolitan area moved outside of a 100-mile radius from their residencies. Most respondents practicing in a metropolitan area practiced within the 100-mile radius. Physicians were likely to be practicing in a community similar to their backgrounds.

Family Practice↗

Assessment of practicing family physicians: comparison of observation in a multiple-station examination using standardized patients with observation of consultations in daily practice.

PURPOSE: Looking for a valid, reliable, and feasible method to collect data on the performances of practicing family physicians, the authors compare the measurement characteristics of a multiple-station examination (MSE) using standardized patients with those of a video assessment of regular consultations in daily practice (practice video assessment, PVA). METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, consultations of 90 family physicians were videotaped both in an MSE and in their daily practices. Peer-observers used a validated instrument (MAAS-Global) to assess the physicians' communication with patients and their medical performances. The physicians were randomly divided into two groups, comparable for demographic characteristics, and half underwent the assessments in reverse order to test for time-order effects. Content validity, criterion validity, reliability, and feasibility of the two methods were compared. RESULTS: Content validity of the PVA was superior to that of the MSE, since the domain of general family practice care was better covered. Observed participants judged the videotaped practice consultations to be "natural," whereas hardly any family physician, after reviewing the videotaped consultations of the MSE, recognized his or her usual working style. Specific criteria made it possible to standardize real practice. Concerning criterion validity, only the medical-performance components of the two methods correlated. No correlation was found for the communication components. Real-practice performance proved to be less influenced by observation than was performance during the MSE. The reliabilities of the two methods, expected to be better in the controlled MSE, were comparable. The administration of the PVA was more flexible, less costly, and better accepted by the family physicians than was that of the MSE. CONCLUSION: Assessment for quality improvement of family physicians' practices by video observation in daily practice is superior to video assessment in a simulated setting using standardized patients.

Adult↗

Translating clinical research into practice: practice-based research networks--a promising solution.

Greater effort is needed to translate research discoveries into clinical practice and to ensure that proven treatments are routinely implemented by physicians. Practice-based research networks are an undervalued resource in the endeavor to bring research results to bear in patient care. These networks are groups of practicing health care providers who have organized to address research questions of primary importance to their patients. Existing practice-based research networks have addressed a wide range of issues, including improvement of preventive service delivery, reliability of diagnostic measures, practice variation, disease prevention, and systems of care coordination. Several deficiencies in the current system prevent practice-based research networks from reaching their full potential as mechanisms of translating clinic research into practice. For practice-based research networks to flourish, they need increased funding for practice-based research networks; information systems to facilitate research by practicing physicians; training programs for health care providers; and communication networks between providers, clinical researchers, professional societies, and academic health centers.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Predicting activity and workload in general practice from the demographic structure of the practice population.

OBJECTIVES: The managerial requirements of budget-setting and performance monitoring in general practice (primary care) in the UK require an understanding of the causal relationship between practice activities and the characteristics of both the practice and its patients. This study sought to model the determinants of three major components of general practice activities (consultations, prescribing costs and referrals to secondary care), paying particular attention to the influence of the demographic structure of the patient list. METHODS: Stepwise regression analysis was carried out on data for 98 practices in the county of Lincolnshire using 12 independent variables pertaining to patient and practice characteristics plus 14 statistical measures derived from the demographic structure of the patients registered with the practice. RESULTS: Robust statistical models were estimated for the three dependent variables, of which list size emerged as the most significant independent variable. In addition, six other independent variables, including the patients' unemployment rate, fundholding status and single-handed status, were statistically significant in one or more of the equations. Variables based on the demographic structure of the practice population also appeared in each model. The Jarman score and degree of urbanization did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Activity and workload in general practice can be predicted from routine data. Such models are of particular value for planning and financial management when demographic change in practice populations is anticipated.

Budgets↗

Clinical practice in academic medical center departments of family medicine. The Association of Departments of Family Medicine Task Force on Clinical Practice in US family medicine departments in academic medical centers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conducted by a task force of the Association of Departments of Family Medicine, this study defines current issues in the clinical practice of academic departments of family medicine in US medical schools. METHODS: A survey instrument on departmental demographics, funding, teaching, and governance in regard to clinical practice was sent to 130 family medicine department chairs or other key contacts in US medical schools. A total of 106 usable responses were obtained, for an 81.5% response rate. RESULTS: Results indicate that, in response to a need to increase clinical practice income, academic medical centers (AMCs) and departments are increasingly hiring physician faculty for positions that mainly involve patient care, although at salaries less than the community level. In spite of increasing departmental responsibilities in predoctoral and resident education and clinical practice, much teaching is done by community physicians. There is significant purchasing of community practices and growing involvement of the AMCs in the practice activities of departments. Two thirds of clinical chairs reported "pretty good" to "great" satisfaction on a five-point scale. CONCLUSIONS: Departments of family medicine are increasing their practice activities, perhaps to the detriment of teaching and research. The clinical practice autonomy of departments of family medicine is being diluted by increased institutional control and by mergers with the practices of other primary care disciplines. These changes give rise to a reasonable concern that academic departments of family medicine and their faculty may give up control of their clinical practice and lose their identity through conversion to "generic" primary care departments and providers.

Academic Medical Centers↗