Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “p16”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

P16 and Ki67 immunostaining is a useful adjunct in the assessment of biopsies for HPV-associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

P16 is a tumor suppressor gene product, shown to be overexpressed in most cervical carcinomas and dysplasias associated with high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. HPV is also associated with anal squamous dysplasias and carcinomas. Significant interobserver and intraobserver variation exists in the interpretation of biopsies for anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). This study was undertaken to assess the potential role of p16 and Ki67 immunohistochemical expression in refining the diagnosis and grading of AIN.One-hundred and four anal biopsies from 74 patients were retrieved from the surgical pathology files of the department. After discrepancies were resolved and concurrence was achieved by at least 2 of 3 reviewing pathologists, the diagnoses were as follows: 37 negative, 12 condylomas without overt dysplasia, 14 AIN I, 25 AIN II, and 16 AIN III. p16 and Ki67 expression was evaluated by ABC immunoperoxidase staining whereas the presence of the high-risk subtypes of HPV virus was determined by in situ hybridization on a subset of the biopsies. Results were reviewed by 2 pathologists and positive and negative staining was correlated with H&E diagnoses. Nuclear and/or nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was considered as positive for p16 when present in >10% of squamous cells. Two patterns of positive p16 staining were observed: (1) "spotty" in which positive cells were scattered throughout the lesion and (2) "band" in which >90% of contiguous cells in the lesion stained positive. A band-like pattern of p16 immunoreactivity was seen in 21.4% AIN I, 80% AIN II, and 87.5% AIN III cases. None of the condylomas and only 1 of the negative cases showed a band of p16 positive staining. Spotty p16 immunoreactivity was observed in 8.1% negative, 8.3% condyloma, 14.3% AIN I, 12.0% AIN II, and 12.5% AIN III cases. More than 50% of nuclei stained positive for Ki67 in 28.6% AIN I, 48.0% AIN II, and 75.0% AIN III cases but in none of the negative or condyloma cases. On the basis of these results, a band-like pattern of p16 staining and Ki67 positivity in >50% of the squamous cell nuclei were strongly associated with high-grade AIN. Conversely, absence of a p16 band of positivity coupled with Ki67 positivity in <50% of nuclei was frequently associated with benign lesions. Band like p16 staining also correlated strongly with the presence of high-risk HPV. Most AIN I lesions stained similar to the nondysplastic cases. A small subset of biopsies studied did not conform to the pattern described above: 4 of 14 (28.6%) AIN I lesions showed a band-like pattern of p16 staining and/or >50% Ki67 positive nuclei. Two of these cases were positive for high-risk HPV DNA. 4 of 25 (16.0%) AIN II lesions comprising 9.8% of the 41 high-grade AINs (AIN II and III) showed spotty p16 positivity and <50% Ki67 positive nuclei. One was positive for high-risk HPV DNA. We conclude that when used together and evaluated in conjunction with H&E stained sections, p16 and Ki67 immunoexpression is a useful adjunct in the diagnosis and grading of AIN.

Adult↗

Correlation of clinicopathological features with immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins p16 and retinoblastoma: distinct association with keratinisation and differentiation in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The p16 and retinoblastoma (Rb) gene products are part of the retinoblastoma pathway controlling the G1-S transition of the cell cycle. Few studies on the expression of p16 and retinoblastoma proteins in oral cavity squamous carcinomas have been conducted. AIM: To correlate the expression of p16 and retinoblastoma proteins to clinicopathological characteristics in these tumours. METHODS: 45 patients with resected oral cavity squamous carcinoma were selected, for whom this was the initial treatment and who were followed up for 5 years or until death. Immunohistochemical stains with antibodies to the Rb and p16 gene products were carried out on paraffin wax-embedded tissue. Data on clinicopathological features such as tumour differentiation, nodal status, stage and survival outcome were collected. RESULTS: Retinoblastoma expression was seen in 39 of 45 (87%) patients and p16 expression in 6 of 45 (13%) patients. A significant inverse correlation was observed between retinoblastoma and p16 expression as nearly all retinoblastoma negative cases were p16 positive, and vice versa. When examined for clinicopathological correlates, it was found that all 39 tumours that expressed retinoblastoma displayed marked keratinisation and were of low-moderate histological grade. Conversely, five of the six tumours that expressed p16 were found to be poorly differentiated, with minimal keratin expression. CONCLUSIONS: Salient relationships were seen between expression of retinoblastoma and p16 and keratinisation. A marked loss of keratin production was evident in the tumours that expressed p16. Tumours expressing retinoblastoma were seen to exhibit more widespread keratinisation. In addition, an inverse staining pattern was found for retinoblastoma and p16 as retinoblastoma-expressing tumours were nearly universally p16 negative and vice versa. No correlation of expression of either p16 or retinoblastoma was found with survival or stage. A link between the histologically observable morphology and expression of cell cycle regulatory protein with the expression of p16 and retinoblastoma has been suggested with keratinisation and differentiation of status.

Adult↗

Expression of tumor suppressor gene p16(INK4) products in primary gastric cancer.

Recent studies have shown that the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p27(Kip1) represents an indicator for patients' outcome in several human malignancies including gastric cancer. However, the clinicopathologic value of another class of CDK inhibitor, p16(INK4), has not been determined. In a retrospective study, we examined the expression of p16(INK4) by immunohistochemical assay of 80 samples of primary gastric cancers and their adjacent nonneoplastic mucosas. Less than 10% of non-tumor gastric mucosal cells were p16(INK4) positive, whereas the expression of p16(INK4) in gastric cancer cells varied widely from 0 to 100% (mean, 24.5%). The expression of p16(INK4) was not seen in 11.3% (9/80) of the cancer cases, but in 65% (52/80) this protein was even overexpressed when compared with the nonneoplastic mucosa. A clinicopathologic survey indicated that a low or no expression of p16(INK4) was associated with poorly differentiated carcinoma (p = 0.0133), but the level of expression did not correlate with other parameters including patients' prognosis or with the expression of the pRb protein. In an effort to explore the underlying mechanism for the p16(INK4)-negative cases, a prospective study was also performed on 20 cases of gastric cancer to compare the level of the p16(INK4) protein with the methylation status of the p16(INK4) promoter. Gastric cancer tissues with methylation expressed significantly lower levels of the p16(INK4) protein (p = 0.0013) and two of them lacked p16(INK4) expression altogether, whereas all the cancer tissues without methylation expressed it. These findings suggest that the p16(INK4) protein may be associated with differentiation of gastric cancer tissues and that methylation of the p16(INK4) promoter may, in part, account for the loss of p16(INK4) expression.

Blotting, Western↗

Loss of expression of the p16 tumor suppressor gene is more frequent in advanced ovarian cancers lacking p53 mutations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that p53 mutations are less frequent in ovarian cancers with alterations in other genes that regulate G1 progression. METHODS: Expression of G1 stimulatory (cyclins D1 and E, cdk4, Ki67) and inhibitory (p16, Rb, p27, p14) genes was analyzed using Western blots in 84 primary ovarian cancers and seven cell lines of known p53 mutation status. Expression of p16 and Rb also was determined using immunohistochemistry and the p16 gene was examined for homozygous deletions and mutations. RESULTS: Loss of p16 protein was more frequent in ovarian cancers with wild-type p53. All four cell lines with wild-type p53 had lost p16 compared to only one of three with mutant p53 genes. p16 expression was absent in 34% (28/82) of primary ovarian cancers, and this was significantly more common in cases with wild-type p53 (14/28, 50%) compared to those with p53 mutations (14/54, 26%, P = 0.03). Homozygous deletion of the p16 gene was found in cell lines lacking p16, but not in any primary cancers. p16 loss was more common in serous (21/52, 40%) than nonserous cancers (4/23, 17%, P = 0.07). Cases that expressed p16 were more likely to express high levels of Rb (47/55, 85%) than p16-negative cases (12/28, 43%, P < 0.001). Loss of Rb occurred in 5/30 (17%) ovarian cancers lacking p53 mutations compared to 5/54 (9%) cases with p53 mutations (P = 0.48). Expression of G1 stimulatory proteins (cyclins D1 and E, cdk4, Ki67) did not correlate with p53 mutation status. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of expression of the p16 tumor suppressor occurs more often in ovarian cancers lacking p53 mutations. These data are consistent with the paradigm that inactivation of p53 is less of a requisite event in ovarian carcinogenesis when another G1 regulatory gene such as p16 already has been inactivated.

Blotting, Western↗

Interruption of p16 gene expression in adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma: clinical correlation.

We previously reported that p16 gene deletion is involved in the development and progression of adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (ATLL). To further investigate the significance of this gene in ATLL, we examined its expression status in 63 patients. Samples were analysed at DNA, mRNA and protein levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse transcription (RT)-coupled real-time PCR and Western blot respectively. Twenty-four patients (38.1%) were p16 gene negative, and they showed significantly shorter survival than p16-gene-positive patients. The expression of p16 mRNA in p16-gene-positive patients varied greatly, and cells from some patients showed up to several hundredfold higher expression than normal lymphocytes. Surprisingly, among 17 patients examined for p16 protein expression, all four patients with unusually high mRNA lacked p16 protein expression, indicating that p16 protein production in these patients was interrupted at the translational level. Moreover, these patients showed significantly shorter survival than p16-protein-positive patients. These results indicate that the presence of p16 gene and p16 mRNA do not necessarily indicate the production of p16 protein in ATLL, and that loss of p16 protein function is involved in progression of ATLL.

Adult↗

Analysis of p16 (CDKN2/MTS-1/INK4A) alterations in primary sporadic uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To define more clearly the role of the tumor suppressor gene p16 in uveal melanoma by determining the relative contribution of all known mechanisms of p16 inactivation in this tumor. METHODS: A comprehensive genetic analysis of the p16 gene was performed in 33 primary sporadic ciliochoroidal and choroidal melanomas. Fourteen highly polymorphic microsatellite markers surrounding the p16 locus on chromosome 9p21 were used for the microsatellite analysis. Sequence analysis of the p16 gene was performed on those tumors with 9p21 loss of heterozygosity. To investigate methylation as an alternative mechanism of inactivation of p16, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed on all tumor DNA samples. RESULTS: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was found in 8 of 33 (24%) uveal melanomas. No evidence of a second region of LOH that did not include the p16 locus was found. Four cases had hemizygous losses including markers both distal and proximal to p16. Homozygous deletion of the p16 gene was detected in the 4 remaining cases by microsatellite analysis. Sequence analysis revealed no p16 mutations in the tumors with hemizygous loss of p16. Methylation of the 5' CpG island of p16 was found in one tumor with 9p21 LOH and in another without LOH. CONCLUSIONS: p16 inactivation by HD or methylation occurs in 27% of uveal melanomas, representing the most common molecular genetic alteration identified thus far in uveal melanoma.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16↗

Modes of silencing of p16 in development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

To clarify modes of silencing of p16 and their concerns to the development and progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs), we examined immunoreactivity of p16, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at six microsatellite loci in 9p13-22, and the methylation status of the p16 promoter in 42 cases of the ESCC at various stages. The samples taken from step sections in and around the tumors were examined to map heterogeneity of those changes. Thereby at least one focus of dysplasia was detected in each case. No immunoexpression of p16 was detected in the ESCCs of 38 cases (90.5%) and in dysplasias of 34 cases (81%), whereas the histologically normal epithelia adjacent to the ESCC showed the p16 expression even in the presence of p16 methylation. Of the ESCCs/dysplasias without p16 expression (38/34), 16/0 showed both p16 methylation and LOH at the near-p16 loci (+/+), 14/30 did only methylation (+/-) and 8/4 did only LOH (-/+). The presence of LOH with/without homozygous deletion (HD) at the near-p16 loci correlated with the advanced tumor stages (P < 0.001). The mapping of +/+ cases indicated that the +/+ carcinomas were included in the +/- carcinomas, which were, in turn, surrounded by the +/- dysplasias and/or by the +/- normal-looking epithelia, whereas the -/+ dysplasias were always accompanied by the -/+ carcinomas. These results suggest that the mode of p16 silencing either through methylation or through LOH and possible mutation is determined in each patient before the occurrence of ESCCs and dysplasia. The mapping of HD and p16 expression suggest that the HD is a later event than the p16 silencing.

Aged↗

[Re-expression of p16 gene in myeloma cell line U266 by arsenic trioxide].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: DNA methylation status regulates gene expression and is associated with oncogenesis. Demethylation of DNA has been proposed as a possible new strategy for cancer prophylaxis and treatment. S-adenosylmethionine is required as methyl donor for both arsenic metabolism and DNA methylation. The present study was designed to explore the possibility and mechanism of re-expression of the silenced p16 gene in human myeloma cell line U266 cells by arsenic trioxide (As2O3). METHODS: The U266 cell line in which the p16 gene is silenced due to hypermethylation was treated with different concentration of As2O3. The PCR technique combined with HpaII and its isoschizomer MspI was used to assess p16 gene methylation status. The mRNA expression levels of p16 and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) genes were determined with RT-PCR technique. Western blot was performed for P16 protein expression analysis. RESULTS: (1)The characteristic hypermethylation with losing expression of p16 gene in U266 cells was confirmed. After agarose gel electrophoresis, the genomic DNA digested with MspI showed a "smear" pattern, however the HpaII digested DNA showed a strong single band. There was no PCR amplified product of p16 gene when MspI digested DNA was used as the templates, whereas a 340 bp p16 gene product was found in HpaII digested DNA sample as the undigested DNA was amplified. Also, neither p16 mRNA nor P16 protein was detectable when assessed with RT-PCR and Western blot, respectively. (2)When the genomic DNA from cells treated with (0.5-2.0) micromol/L As2O3 was digested with HpaII and then analyzed by electrophoresis, a "smear" pattern was observed. The 340 bp product could not be amplified if such digested DNA was used as PCR templates. Detectable expression of both p16 mRNA and P16 protein was found in the cells treated with 1.0 micromol/L and 2.0 micromol/L As2O3. (3)Expression levels of DNMT 3A and 3B mRNA were increased in the treated cells and were dependent on As2O3 concentration, however no significant difference was found between each two groups (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: As2O3 could induce p16 gene re-expression in human myeloma cell line U266 through DNA demethylation.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Hypermethylation of the p16 gene promoter in pterygia and its association with the expression of DNA methyltransferase 3b.

PURPOSE: A pterygium has long been considered as a degenerative condition. After p53 protein was found to be abnormally expressed in the epithelium, researchers suggested that a pterygium may be a tumor, but additional evidence is required to support this hypothesis. Aberrant methylation of the p16 gene (CDKN2A) promoter and resultant gene silencing play important roles in the pathogenesis of many types of human cancers. The purpose of this study was to investigate hypermethylation of the p16 promoter in pterygia and the relationship between this hypermethylation and the expression of p16 and DNA methyltransferase 3b (DNMT3b) proteins. METHODS: We studied the methylation status of p16 and the expression of p16 and DNMT3b proteins by performing methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, respectively, in specimens of 129 pterygia and 16 normal conjunctiva. The results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Hypermethylation of the p16 gene promoter was detected in 21 (16.3%) of 129 pterygial specimens. Among them, 46 (35.7%) were positive for p16 protein expression, and 83 (64.3%) were negative. Staining for p16 was limited to the nuclei of the epithelial layer. We observed a significant reverse correlation between hypermethylation of the p16 promoter and the expression of p16 protein (p=0.006). Thirty-eight (29.5%) pterygial specimens were positive for DNMT3b protein expression, and 91 (70.5%) were negative. DNMT3b staining was limited to the nuclei of the epithelial layer. A significant correlation was found between hypermethylation of the p16 promoter and the expression of DNMT3b protein (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The p16 gene promoter was hypermethylated in pterygia, and this hypermethylation was strongly linked to expression of the positive expression of DNMT3b protein and to the suppression of p16 protein. These data provided molecular evidence that methylation occurs in pterygia and that it may play a role in the their development.

Aged↗

A comparison of the clinical utility of p16(INK4a) immunolocalization with the presence of human papillomavirus by hybrid capture 2 for the detection of cervical dysplasia/neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that overexpression of p16(INK4a) protein indicates infection and genomic integration of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) and predicts progression to cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and carcinoma. The authors compared the ability of p16(INK4a) and HR HPV detection by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) to detect the presence of significant cervical disease. METHODS.: Four hundred ThinPrep specimens (100 each in 4 categories: 100 specimens that were negative for intraepithelial lesions, 100 specimens of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US], 100 specimens of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSILs], and 100 specimens of HSILs) were analyzed. p16(INK4a) protein was immunolocalized using a specific monoclonal antibody, and the detection of HR HPV in all 400 specimens was determined using HC2. RESULTS: p16(INK4a) was found to be positive in 78% of HSIL specimens, 42% of LSIL specimens, and 36% of ASC-US specimens; whereas HC2 was positive in 92% of HSIL specimens, 81% of LSIL specimens, and 45% of ASC-US specimens. In the HSIL category, the sensitivity, which was calculated using Grade 2 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as the endpoint, was 78% (50 of 66 specimens) for p16(INK4a) and 91% (60 of 66 specimens) for HC2. For LSIL, the sensitivity was 75% (3 of 4 specimens) for p16(INK4a) and 100% (4 of 4 specimens) for HC2. In the ASC-US category, the sensitivity was 89% (8 of 9 specimens) for p16(INK4a) and 100% (9 of 9 specimens) for HC2. Overall, the sensitivity for HSIL was 92% for HC2 and 78% for p16(INK4a). The specificity for HC2 was 8.3% for HSIL, 16.9% for LSIL, and 48.7% for ASC-US; whereas the specificity for p16(INK4a) was 25% in HSIL, 59.1% in LSIL, and 68.4% in ASC-US. The overall specificity was 25% for HC2 and 56% for p16(INK4a). CONCLUSIONS: Although both p16(INK4a) and HC2 may aid in the clinical management of patients with clinically significant lesions, HC2 was found to have greater sensitivity, and p16(INK4a) greater specificity. The labeling of normal cells and bacteria may preclude the use of p16(INK4a) in automated screening or nonmorphologic assays.

Adolescent↗

p16 expression in primary malignant melanoma is associated with prognosis and lymph node status.

Lymph node (LN) status is an important prognostic factor in melanoma patients. p16 expression and proliferation rate (MIB-1) of primary melanomas have been suggested as a marker of metastatic potential. In this study, the correlation of p16 expression and the proliferation rate (MIB-1) with LN status and tumor-specific survival was investigated in primary melanomas. MIB-1 and p16 expression were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 64 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Thirty four nevi were used as control. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node staging. Three different p16 staining patterns were observed: a combination of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, only cytoplasmic staining and absence of p16 expression. All 34 nevi displayed a nuclear and cytoplasmic p16 staining, whereas p16 was negative in 14 of 64 (22%) melanomas. The level of p16 expression gradually decreased from benign nevi to melanoma without metastasis to melanoma with metastasis. There was a significant correlation between cytoplasmic p16 expression and absence of metastasis (p < 0.05). Death of disease correlated with absence of p16 immunostaining (p = 0.01). MIB-1 expression was not associated with survival. These results confirm the relevance of p16 expression as a prognostic marker in melanoma patients. In addition, it was shown that cytoplasmic immunostaining for p16 in primary melanoma might serve as a predictor of the LN status. Therefore, immunohistochemical evaluation for p16 expression is of potential value for treatment planning in melanoma surgery.

Adult↗

Several noncontiguous domains of CDK4 are involved in binding to the P16 tumor suppressor protein.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) is a key molecule in the regulation of cell cycle progression at the G1-S phase restriction point. Its activity is specifically regulated by p16 (also known as p16/CDKN2A, p16(INK4a), and MTS1), a tumor suppressor frequently altered in human cancers. A specific mutation in CDK4 codon 24 (Arginine to Cysteine) prevents p16 binding and thus inhibition by p16. This mutated CDK4 acts as a dominant oncogene and has been found in both sporadic and familial melanoma. To study the effects of other mutations in CDK4, we generated a panel of 18 CDK4 mutants using Charged-to-Alanine scanning mutagenesis, and investigated the p16-binding capacity of these mutants to identify novel sites involved in p16 binding. The mutant CDK4 proteins were generated by direct coupled transcription-translation in vitro and tested for binding to p16 using a p16-GST fusion protein. Several mutants demonstrated loss of p16 binding. In addition to the previously identified codon 24 mutants, alterations in and around codon 22, 25, 97, and 281 all showed loss of p16 binding capacity. These results indicate that several noncontiguous amino acid sequences on CDK4 are required for binding to p16, which suggests the existence of multiple sites of interaction with p16. Since p16-binding deficient CDK4 has oncogenic potential, these mutations may be present in melanomas or other human neoplasms.

Arginine↗

Expression of p16(INK4A) induces dominant suppression of glioblastoma growth in situ through necrosis and cell cycle arrest.

Tumor suppressor genes may represent an important new therapeutic modality in the treatment of human glioblastoma (GBM). p16(INK4A) is a tumor suppressor gene with mutation and/or deletion found in many human tumors, including glioblastomas, melanoma, and leukemias. RT-2 rat GBM cell line was used to investigate if the p16 gene induces dominant suppression of glioblastoma growth. Close to 100% of tumor cells were infected by high titer pCL retrovirus encoding the full-length human p16 cDNA at 5 m.o.i. Infected cells showed a 98% reduction in colony forming assay and a 60% reduction in growth curves in vitro compared to vector control. Exogenous overexpression of p16 induced hypophosphorylation of Rb protein by Western blot analysis. Intracranial injection of p16-infected tumor cells into syngeneic rats resulted in a 95% reduction in tumor volume compared to the controls. Intratumoral injection of p16 retrovirus resulted in tumor necrosis and prominent human p16 transgene expressions. Proliferation marker PCNA was not detected in these human p16-expressed RT-2 tumor cells, suggesting the cells were unable to enter into S phase after p16 expression. In addition, direct repeat intracranial injections of p16 retrovirus prolonged animal survival 3.2-fold compared to the controls (48.4 +/- 13.4 vs 15.0 +/- 2.1 days, p < 0.001). Two out of ten rats were found with dormant tumors at day 60 after p16 retrovirus injection. These results showed that p16 is effective in inhibiting GBM growth in situ. The mechanisms of tumor growth reduction and necrosis in vivo might be due to G1 arrest triggered by p16 expression.

Animals↗

Inhibiting tumorigenic potential by restoration of p16 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The p16 gene, encodes a key checkpoint protein p16 in the cell cycle, has been reported inactivation in a wide variety of human cancers. We have previously demonstrated high frequency of p16 alterations in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), xenografts and cell lines. The finding implied that inactivation of the p16 gene may play an important role in the NPC development. To investigate the tumour suppressor function of p16 in NPC, we transfected p16-deficient NPC cell line, NPC/HK-1, with a wild-type p16 expression construct, and evaluated growth and tumorigenic properties of the clones stably expressing exogenous p16. Expression of the exogenous wild-type p16 significantly inhibited cell growth by more than 70% when compared to that of the parental and empty vector-transfected cells. This growth inhibition was attributable to a significant proportion of p16-expressing cells arrested at G1 phase in the cell cycle as revealed by flow cytometric analysis. By anchorage-independent colony forming assay, we found that the ability to form colonies in soft agar was highly reduced in cells expressing p16. NPC/HK1 cells expressing functional p16 also showed suppressed tumorigenicity in athymic nude mice. Taken together, our results provide strong evidence for a tumour suppressor role of p16 in NPC.

Animals↗

Cyclin D1 amplification and p16(MTS1/CDK4I) deletion correlate with poor prognosis in head and neck tumors.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Cyclin D1, a cell cycle regulator localized to chromosome 11q13, is amplified in several human tumors including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Amplification and/or overexpression of cyclin D1 have been correlated to a poor prognosis. Deletion of the p16 gene, localized to 9p21, has also been observed in a significant proportion of HNSCC. The p16 gene regulates cyclin D1-CDK4 activity and prevents retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene phosphorylation, thereby downregulating cellular proliferation. Detection of cyclin D1 amplification and p16 deletion using a simple and sensitive method will be valuable for the development of effective treatment modalities for head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We have used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to study cyclin D1 amplification and p16 gene deletion in head and neck tumors. Both single- and dual-color FISH were performed. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tissues from 103 patients with HNSCC were analyzed using genomic DNA probes for cyclin D1 and p16. Dual-color FISH was performed with chromosome 11 or 9 centromeric probes as a control. Twenty-eight of these samples were analyzed for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Cyclin D1 amplification was observed in 30% (31/103) of patients, and p16 deletion in 52% (54/103). Lack of p16 expression was observed in 64% (18/28) of patients. There was a good correlation between the deletion of p16 sequences and the loss of p16 expression (P = .008). Amplification of cyclin D1 had a statistically significant association with recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival at 36 months. There was a significant association between p16 deletion and the development of distant metastases. Cyclin D1 amplification and p16 deletion together correlated with recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that FISH is a simple and sensitive method for detecting cyclin D1 amplification and p16 deletion in head and neck cancer. Our results suggest that these two genetic aberrations together portend a poorer outcome than either of the abnormalities alone in head and neck cancer.

Adult↗

The ARF-p16 gene locus in carcinogenesis and therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We have identified families with a high incidence of tumors including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The occurrence of melanoma in these kindreds suggested that the ARF-p16 gene may be involved in carcinogenesis. We wished to determine the gene defect associated with the familial predisposition to HNSCC and to determine whether restoration of the gene may have therapeutic benefit. STUDY DESIGN: Translational molecular research. METHODS: Molecular techniques were used to identify mutations of the ARF-p16 gene from the affected families and to test the activity of p16 and ARF mutants. In additional, HNSCC tumor tissue was analyzed to determine whether the wild-type p16 allele was lost or maintained. ARF-expressing adenoviruses were created, and their effect on HNSCC cell lines and normal head and neck epithelial cells was determined. RESULTS: Mutation of the ARF-p16 gene was found in two families with predisposition to develop HNSCC. Independent mutations detected in the germline DNA of both families inactivated p16, but not ARF, and the inactive mutant p16 allele segregated with disease within both families. The wild-type p16 allele was lost in HNSCC tumor tissue from both families. The efficacy of ARF in treatment of HNSCC was found to depend on retention of p53 activity within HNSCC tumor cells. Remarkably, ARF expression was found to kill cells, depending on loss of retinoblastoma activity. Because loss of retinoblastoma activity is nearly universal in tumors, ARF killed tumor cells that retained p53, but ARF spared normal cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the recognition of a new clinical entity of familial head and neck cancer. We have shown that this syndrome is associated with inactivating mutations of the p16 gene that these mutations segregate with disease in two described families. Loss of the wild-type p16 allele in HNSCC tissue from both families strongly supports the role of the mutant p16 in carcinogenesis. We have also investigated the therapeutic utility of the alternate reading frame product of the p16 gene, ARF. The finding that ARF kills cells depending on loss of retinoblastoma activity and retention of p53 suggests that ARF may be effective in treatment of roughly 50% of head and neck cancers while sparing normal cells. Recognition of p16 mutations as an etiological factor in familial HNSCC provides an accessible tool for diagnosis of this syndrome. Clinical acceptance of familial head and neck cancer will ensure that patients are appropriately diagnosed and managed.

ADP-Ribosylation Factors↗

p16(INK4a) expression correlates with degree of cervical neoplasia: a comparison with Ki-67 expression and detection of high-risk HPV types.

Although recent studies have suggested that p16(INK4a) may be a useful surrogate biomarker of cervical neoplasia, Ki-67 and human papillomavirus testing have also been shown to be useful in detecting neoplasia. To help delineate the utility of p16(INK4a), biopsy samples (n = 569: negative, 133; reactive, 75; atypical, 39; low grade, 76; moderate, 80; and severe intraepithelial neoplasia, 113; also, squamous cell carcinoma, 46; adenocarcinoma, 7) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 (n = 432), as well as by in situ hybridization for human papillomavirus Type 16 (n = 219). Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus types by polymerase chain reaction and HybridCapture2 was performed on concurrent cervical swab specimens. Recuts of the original blocks were reexamined (n = 198). Endometrial biopsies (n = 10) were also analyzed for p16(INK4a) expression. Degree of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 expression correlated with degree of cervical neoplasia (P <.001) and with presence of high-risk human papillomavirus types (P <.001). There was no relationship between p16(INK4a) overexpression and inflammation or hormonal status. Ki-67 expression correlated with inflammation (P = 0.003) and was expressed in more reactive and atypical lesions than p16(INK4a) (P = 0.008). Probes for human papillomavirus 16 stained 54% of cervical neoplastic lesions; the degree of staining correlated significantly with degree of neoplasia (P <.001) and p16(INK4a) staining (P <.001). Interobserver reproducibility was substantial for p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 interpretation (weighted kappa: 0.74 and 0.70, respectively). Expression of p16(INK4a) was observed in all endometrial biopsies. Compared with Ki-67 expression and detection of high-risk human papillomavirus, p16(INK4a) was less likely to be positive in samples from women with negative, reactive, and atypical biopsies. Although expression of p16(INK4a) in endometrial epithelium may be problematic in terms of screening, the potential of p16(INK4a) as a screening test warrants investigation.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Expression, deletion [was deleton] and mutation of p16 gene in human gastric cancer.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the expression of p16 gene and the gastric carcinogenesis, depth of invasion and lymph node metastases, and to evaluate the deletion and mutation of exon 2 in p16 gene in gastric carcinoma. METHODS: The expression of p16 protein was examined by streptavidin-peroxidase conjugated method (S-P);the deletion and mutation of p16 gene were respectively examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (PCR-SSCP) in gastric carcinoma. RESULTS: Expression of p16 protein was detected in 96.25% (77/80) of the normal gastric mucosa, in 92.00% (45/50) of the dysplastic gastric mucosa and in 47.54% (58/122) of the gastric carcinoma. The positive rate of p16 protein expression in gastric carcinoma was significantly lower than that in normal gastric mucosa and dysplastic gastric mucosa (P < 0.05). The positive rate of p16 protein expression in mucoid carcinoma 10.00% (1/10) was significantly lower than that in poorly differentiated carcinoma 51.22% (21/41), undifferentiated carcinoma 57.69% (15/26) and signet ring cell carcinoma 62.50% (10/16) (P < 0.05). The positive rate of p16 protein in 30 cases paired primary and lymph node metastatic gastric carcinoma: There was 46.67% (14/30) in primary gastric carcinoma, 16.67% (5/30) in lymph node metastatic gastric carcinoma. The positive rate of lymph node metastatic carcinoma was significantly lower than that of primary carcinoma (P < 0.05). There was of p16 gene mutation in exon 2, but 5 cases displayed deletion of p16 gene in exon 2 in the 25 primary gastric carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The expression loss of p16 protein related to the gastric carcinogenesis, gastric carcinoma histopathological subtypes and lymph metastasis. The mutation of p16 gene in exon 2 may not be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. But the deletion of p16 gene in exon 2 may be involved in gastric carcinogenesis.

Adult↗