Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “fear conditioning”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Conditioned fear extinction and reinstatement in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

The purpose of this study was to analyze fear extinction and reinstatement in humans using fear-potentiated startle. Participants were fear conditioned using a simple discrimination procedure with colored lights as the conditioned stimuli (CSs) and an airblast to the throat as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Participants were extinguished 24 h after fear conditioning. Upon presentation of unsignaled USs after extinction, participants displayed significant fear reinstatement. In summary, these procedures produced robust fear-potentiated startle, significant CS+/CS- discrimination, within-session extinction, and significant reinstatement. This is the first demonstration of fear extinction and reinstatement in humans using startle measures.

Conditioning, Classical↗
PubMed1999

Intrahippocampal infusions of a metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist block the memory of context-specific but not tone-specific conditioned fear.

The role of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the acquisition of learning and memory using fear conditioning as a behavioral model was examined. The mGluR antagonist (R, S)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG) was infused into the hippocampus 30 min before fear conditioning, and freezing was measured during both acquisition and retention tests. The results show that pretraining antagonism of MCPG-sensitive mGluRs in the hippocampus impaired context-specific memory for an aversive event during testing. The memory for tone-specific fear, however, remained intact despite pretraining infusion of MCPG. Treating rats with MCPG did not affect context- or tone-specific fear during acquisition. Results suggest that mGluR activation may play an important role in hippocampally mediated memory consolidation.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex do not interfere with long-term memory of extinction of conditioned fear.

Lesion studies indicate that rats without the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) have difficulty recalling fear extinction acquired the previous day. Several electrophysiological studies have also supported this observation by demonstrating that extinction-related increases in neuronal activity in the mPFC participate in expression of fear extinction. However, a more recent study has shown that fear extinction can be recalled, in certain circumstances, without mPFC potentiation, suggesting contribution of other circuits. Here, we examined this possibility in rats that were subjected to auditory fear conditioning, extinction training, and extinction retention test 7 d later. Electrolytic lesions were made in the mPFC, the motor cortex (MO), the dorsal septum (SEP), or the mediodorsal thalamus (MD), because of their potential participation in conditioned fear inhibition; combined lesions including the mPFC with the MO, SEP, or MD were also made. The lesions were made either 1 wk before conditioning or 1 d after extinction training. All rats normally extinguished their conditioned freezing behavior during extinction training and did not display any return of this behavior during the retention test. These data reveal that the mPFC is not required for the acquisition, the expression, or the retrieval of extinction memories but do not exclude the possibility that the mPFC normally participates in these processes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2004

Selective neurotoxic lesions of basolateral and central nuclei of the amygdala produce differential effects on fear conditioning.

In the fear conditioning literature, it is generally hypothesized that neurons in the basolateral amygdalar complex (BLA) (lateral and basal nuclei) support the formation of conditioned fear memory and project to neurons in the central nucleus (CeA) for the expression of conditioned fear responses. According to this serial processing-transmission view, damage to either BLA or CeA would comparably disrupt the expression of a variety of conditioned fear responses. In the present study, we further investigated the roles of BLA and CeA in fear conditioning by concurrently assessing freezing and 22 kHz ultrasonic vocalization (USV) as dependent measures of fear in rats. Selective neurotoxins, NMDA for the BLA and ibotenic acid for the CeA, were used to destroy intrinsic neurons [evidenced by thionin dye and NeuN (neuronal nuclei) antibody stainings] without damaging the fibers of passage (confirmed by myelin staining). During the 10 tone-footshock paired training, postshock freezing and USV responses were significantly impaired in BLA-lesioned animals, whereas CeA-lesioned animals exhibited only mild deficits. Similarly, conditioned fear responses assessed 24 hr after training were severely reduced in BLA-lesioned animals but not in CeA-lesioned animals. In contrast to ibotenic lesions of the CeA, small electrolytic lesions of the CeA strongly affected both postshock and conditioned freezing and USV. Together, these results do not support the currently espoused BLA-to-CeA serial processing-transmission view of fear conditioning. Instead, the expression of conditioned fear appears to primarily involve BLA projections that course through the CeA en route to downstream fear response structures.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2002

Absence of dopamine D4 receptors results in enhanced reactivity to unconditioned, but not conditioned, fear.

The prefrontal cortex receives a major dopaminergic input from the ventral tegmental area, which plays an important role in the integration of neuronal signals influencing behavioural responses to stressful environmental stimuli. The dopamine D4 receptor (D4R) is expressed at highest levels in the prefrontal cortex and is the predominant D2-like receptor localized in this brain area. To investigate the functional significance of D4Rs in dopamine-mediated responses we have analysed a strain of mice lacking this receptor subtype (Drd4-/-). Wild-type and Drd4-/- mice were challenged in two different approach/avoidance conflict paradigms: the elevated plus maze and the light/dark preference exploration test. By these behavioural measures Drd4-/- mice showed heightened avoidance to the more fear-provoking areas of each maze as demonstrated by reduced exploration of the open arms of the plus maze and longer latencies to explore the illuminated compartment of the light/dark shuttle box. These exaggerated avoidance behaviours were further enhanced by an additional handling stress but completely prevented by anxiolytic agents such as the benzodiazepine midazolam and ethanol. Although Drd4-/- mice displayed heightened anxiety, they exhibited normal ethanol preference and consumption in a two-bottle choice test. Learned fear responses evaluated by contextual, cued and instrumental fear-conditioning tests showed no difference between wild-type and Drd4-/- mice. Taken together these results indicate that the absence of D4Rs increases avoidance behaviour to unconditioned stimuli and does not impair behavioural reactions to Pavlovian fear-conditioning, suggesting that the D4R could play a key role in the dopaminergic modulation of cortical signals triggered by environmental stimuli.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Opioid-dependent effects of inescapable shock on escape behavior and conditioned fear responding are mediated by the dorsal raphe nucleus.

Manipulations of the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) modulate the behavioral effects of exposure to inescapable shock (IS). Opiate agonists and antagonists also influence the impact of IS, but the role of the DRN in mediating these effects is unknown. The opiate antagonist naltrexone micro-injected into the region of the DRN immediately prior to IS prevented both the escape deficit and the enhancement of fear conditioning that occur 24 h later. Intra-DRN naltrexone administered at the time of later behavioral testing reduced, but did not eliminate, these effects of prior IS. Conversely, the opiate agonist morphine, in combination with a subthreshold number of 20 IS trials, induced an escape deficit and enhanced conditioned fear 24 h later. Microinjections of naltrexone into the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray area did not alter the effects of IS and electrolytic lesions of the DRN prevented the effect of the morphine-20 IS trial combination. The role of opioids in mediating the behavioral effects of IS is discussed.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1997

Odor-guided fear conditioning in rats: 2. Lesions of the anterior perirhinal cortex disrupt fear conditioned to the explicit conditioned stimulus but not to the training context.

Previous studies examining the neural substrates of fear conditioning have indicated unequivocally that the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear depends critically on the integrity of the amygdala. The extent to which the rhinal cortical areas contribute to fear conditioned to either the explicit conditioned stimulus (CS) or to the training context is less clear, however. The effects of pretraining lesions of the anterior perirhinal (PRH) cortex on fear conditioned to an explicit odor CS and to the context in which CS-unconditioned stimulus pairing took place was examined in rats. Rats with PRH cortex lesions demonstrated a robust attenuation of fear conditioned to the explicit CS, but no attenuation of fear conditioned to the training context. These data suggest that the PRH cortex is an important component of the neural system supporting the association between olfactory cues and footshock and add to a growing body of evidence implicating the rhinal cortical regions in associative learning.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lead and conditioned fear to contextual and discrete cues.

Male Fischer 344 rats received either tap water or water containing 250 ppm lead for 90 days prior to training in either Pavlovian fear conditioning or consummatory contrast, an aversive reward reduction paradigm. In Experiment 1, lead-exposed and -unexposed rats were trained in operant chambers over a 6-min session. After 3 min elapsed, three tone-shock pairings were presented over the remainder of the session. Rats then received 7 days of extinction training in an identical procedure with only tones presented, no shocks. Lead-exposed rats exhibited greater behavioral suppression to both the contextual and auditory cues that predicted shock. In Experiment 2, rats were placed in operant chambers daily and allowed to consume either a 15% or a 5% fructose solution for 7 days. On Day 8, the rats consuming the 15% fructose solution were shifted to the 5% solution for 3 days. Lead-exposed rats did not differ from their controls in either initial consumption of either solution or in the suppression of their consumption after shifting to the 5% solution. Taken together, these findings suggest that lead impairs the extinction of fear conditioning and this finding is not due to a nonspecific increase in aversive emotionality.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2001

Visual pathways involved in fear conditioning measured with fear-potentiated startle: behavioral and anatomic studies.

Visual pathways to the amygdala, a brain structure critical for classical fear conditioning, were investigated. Conditioned fear was measured in rats as increased acoustic startle amplitude in the presence versus absence of a light or an odor paired previously with foot shock (fear-potentiated startle). Post-training lesions of both the lateral geniculate body (LG) and lateral posterior nucleus (LP) of the thalamus together, but not lesions of LG or LP alone, completely blocked the expression of fear-potentiated startle to a visual conditioned stimulus (CS) but not to an olfactory CS. These lesions also did not block contextual fear conditioning using startle or freezing as measures. Local infusion of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-nitro-2,3-dioxo-benzo[f] quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide disodium, an AMPA antagonist, into the visual thalamus immediately before testing also blocked fear-potentiated startle to a visual CS, suggesting that the lesion effects were not attributable to damage of fibers of passage. Iontophoretic injections into the LP of the anterograde tracer biotinylated dextran amine resulted in heavy anterograde labeling in two amygdala-fugal cortical areas: area TE2 and dorsal perirhinal cortex (PR), and moderate labeling in the lateral amygdaloid nucleus (L). These results suggest that, during classical fear conditioning, a visual stimulus can be transmitted to the amygdala via either lemniscal (i.e., LG --> V1, V2 --> TE2/PR) or non-lemniscal (i.e., LP --> V2, TE2/PR) thalamo-cortico-amygdala pathways, or direct thalamo-amygdala (i.e., LP --> L) projections.

Amygdala↗
PubMed1986

Lesions of the amygdala, but not of the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm.

Rats were given 10 light-shock pairings on 2 successive days. At 24-48 hr following training, groups of rats received bilateral transection of the cerebellar peduncles, bilateral lesions of the red nucleus (which receives most of the cerebellar efferents), or bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala. Control rats were sham operated. At 3-4 days after surgery, the rats were tested for potentiated startle (increased acoustic startle in the presence of the light previously paired with shock). Potentiated startle was blocked by lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala. Transection of the cerebellar peduncles or lesions of the red nucleus did not block potentiated startle. A second experiment in which a visual prepulse test was used indicated that the blockade of potentiated startle observed in the animals with amygdala lesions could not be attributed to optic tract damage. A third experiment demonstrated that the absence of potentiation in the animals with amygdala lesions was not simply due to a lowered startle level ceiling, because these animals could show increased startle with increased stimulus intensity and with administration of strychnine, a drug that increases startle. Taken together, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amygdala is involved in fear conditioning, because potentiated startle is a measure of conditioned fear.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2006

The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.

Expression of conditional fear without awareness has been previously demonstrated during delay conditioning, a procedure in which the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (UCS) overlap. However, less is known about the role of awareness in trace fear conditioning, where an interval of time separates the CS and UCS. The present study assessed skin conductance response (SCR) and UCS expectancy during delay and trace conditioning. UCS predictability was varied on a trial-by-trial basis by presenting perithreshold auditory CSs. Differential UCS expectancies were demonstrated only on perceived delay and trace trials. Learning-related SCRs were observed during both perceived and unperceived delay CSs. In contrast, differential SCRs were demonstrated only for perceived trace CSs. These data suggest that awareness is necessary for conditional responding during trace, but not delay, fear conditioning.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Nicotine enhances contextual fear conditioning and ameliorates ethanol-induced deficits in contextual fear conditioning.

Nicotine and ethanol are 2 commonly used and abused drugs that have divergent effects on learning. The present study examined the effects of acute nicotine (0.25 mg/kg), ethanol (1.0 g/kg), and ethanol-nicotine coadministration on fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice. Mice were assessed for contextual and cued fear conditioning at 1 day and 1 week posttraining. Ethanol disrupted acquisition but not consolidation of contextual fear conditioning; nicotine enhanced contextual fear conditioning and ameliorated ethanol-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning. Mecamylamine antagonized this effect. Fear conditioning was reassessed 1 week after initial testing with no drug administered. At the 1-week retest, mice previously treated with nicotine continued to show enhanced contextual fear, and mice previously treated with ethanol continued to show contextual fear deficits. Thus, nicotine both produces a long-lasting enhancement of contextual fear conditioning and protects against ethanol-associated deficits.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The place of the hippocampus in fear conditioning.

Pavlovian fear conditioning is a phenomenon amenable to laboratory analysis of the neurobiology of fear and the investigation of neural mechanisms of learning and memory. Investigators have made much progress in delineating the neurocircuitry and neurochemistry of fear conditioning. The place of the hippocampus in context fear remains a controversial issue. In this review, we examine the evidence that the hippocampus plays a role in fear conditioning. We then critically examine hypotheses concerning its exact role in learning and memory for cued and context fear conditioning.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Bidirectional synaptic plasticity in intercalated amygdala neurons and the extinction of conditioned fear responses.

Classical fear conditioning is believed to result from potentiation of conditioned synaptic inputs in the basolateral amygdala. That is, the conditioned stimulus would excite more neurons in the central nucleus and, via their projections to the brainstem and hypothalamus, evoke fear responses. However, much data suggests that extinction of fear responses does not depend on the reversal of these changes but on a parallel NMDA-dependent learning that competes with the first one. Because they control impulse traffic from the basolateral amygdala to the central nucleus, GABAergic neurons of the intercalated cell masses are ideally located to implement this second learning. Consistent with this hypothesis, the present study shows that low- and high-frequency stimulation of basolateral afferents respectively induce long-term depression (LTD) and potentiation (LTP) of responses in intercalated cells. Moreover, induction of LTP and LTD is prevented by application of an NMDA antagonist. To determine how these activity-dependent changes are expressed, we tested whether LTD and LTP induction are associated with modifications in paired-pulse facilitation, an index of transmitter release probability. Only LTP induction was associated with a change in paired-pulse facilitation. Depotentiation of previously potentiated synapses did not revert the modification in paired pulse facilitation, suggesting that LTP is associated with presynaptic alterations, but that LTD and depotentiation depend on postsynaptic changes. Taken together, our results suggest that basolateral synapses onto intercalated neurons can express NMDA-dependent LTP and LTD, consistent with the possibility that intercalated neurons are a critical locus of plasticity for the extinction of conditioned fear responses. Ultimately, these plastic events may prevent conditioned amygdala responses from exciting neurons of the central nucleus, and thus from evoking conditioned fear responses.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2006

Acute cognitive impairment after lateral fluid percussion brain injury recovers by 1 month: evaluation by conditioned fear response.

Conditioned fear associates a contextual environment and cue stimulus to a foot shock in a single training trial, where fear expressed to the trained context or cue indicates cognitive performance. Lesion, aspiration or inactivation of the hippocampus and amygdala impair conditioned fear to the trained context and cue, respectively. Moreover, only bilateral experimental manipulations, in contrast to unilateral, abolish cognitive performance. In a model of unilateral brain injury, we sought to test whether a single lateral fluid percussion brain injury impairs cognitive performance in conditioned fear. Brain-injured mice were evaluated for anterograde cognitive deficits, with the hypothesis that acute injury-induced impairments improve over time. Male C57BL/6J mice were brain-injured, trained at 5 or 27 days post-injury, and tested 48h later for recall of the association between the conditioned stimuli (trained context or cue) and the unconditioned stimulus (foot shock) by quantifying fear-associated freezing behavior. A significant anterograde hippocampal-dependent cognitive deficit was observed at 7 days in brain-injured compared to sham. Cued fear conditioning could not detect amygdala-dependent cognitive deficits after injury and stereological estimation of amygdala neuron number corroborated this finding. The absence of injury-related freezing in a novel context substantiated injury-induced hippocampal-dependent cognitive dysfunction, rather than generalized fear. Variations in the training and testing paradigms demonstrated a cognitive deficit in consolidation, rather than acquisition or recall. By 1-month post-injury, cognitive function recovered in brain-injured mice. Hence, the acute injury-induced cognitive impairment may persist while transient pathophysiological sequelae are underway, and improve as global dysfunction subsides.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effects of suramin on neuroendocrine and behavioural responses to conditioned fear stimuli.

Conditioned fear stimuli suppress motor activity. The fear stimuli suppress vasopressin and facilitate oxytocin and prolactin release. These fear responses are impaired by selective destruction of noradrenergic neurones. Adenosine 5'-triphosphate is co-released from noradrenergic nerve terminals with noradrenaline. Thus the possibility arises that the behavioural and neuroendocrine responses may be mediated by purinergic rather than noradrenergic synapses. We examined whether suramin, an inhibitor of P2 and NMDA receptors, blocks conditioned fear responses. Suramin injected i.c.v. 30 min before testing stimuli impaired conditioned fear responses. The role of purinergic P2 receptors in expression of the behavioural and neuroendocrine responses to conditioned fear stimuli is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Single neurons in the dentate gyrus and CA1 of the hippocampus exhibit inverse patterns of encoding during trace fear conditioning.

Trace fear conditioning is a hippocampus-dependent learning task that requires the association of an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and a shock unconditioned stimulus (US) that are separated by a 20-s trace interval. Single-neuron activity was recorded simultaneously from the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA1 of rats during unpaired pseudoconditioning and subsequent trace fear conditioning. Single neurons in DG showed a progressive increase in learning-related activity to the CS and US across trace fear conditioning. Single neurons in CA1 showed an early increase in responding to the CS, which developed into a decrease in firing later in trace conditioning. Correlation analyses showed that DG and CA1 units exhibit inverse patterns of responding to the CS during trace fear conditioning.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Evidence for differential modulation of conditioned aversion and fear-conditioned analgesia by CB1 receptors.

Fear-conditioned analgesia is an important survival response mediated by substrates controlling nociception and aversion. Cannabinoid(1) (CB(1)) receptors play an important role in nociception and aversion. However, their role in fear-conditioned analgesia has not been investigated. This study investigated the effects of systemic administration of the CB(1) receptor antagonist, SR141716A (1 mg/kg, i.p.), on fear-conditioned analgesia and conditioned aversion in rats. Twenty-four hours after receiving footshock, rats exhibited reduced formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour, increased freezing and increased defecation when tested in the footshock apparatus, compared with non-footshocked formalin-injected rats. SR141716A attenuated fear-conditioned analgesia, freezing and defecation. Importantly, SR141716A had no effect on formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour over an equivalent time period in rats not receiving footshock. SR141716A had no effect on contextually induced freezing during the first half of the test trial in rats receiving intra-plantar injection of saline. Administration of SR1417176A did, however, attenuate short-term extinction of contextually induced freezing and ultrasound emission in rats receiving intra-plantar saline, compared with vehicle-treated saline controls. These data suggest an important role for the CB(1) receptor in mediating fear-conditioned analgesia and provide evidence for differential modulation of conditioned aversive behaviour by CB(1) receptors during tonic, persistent pain.

Analgesia↗