Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Timolol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Changing therapy from timolol to betaxolol. Effect on intraocular pressure in selected patients with glaucoma. Timolol-Betaxolol Study Group.

Three hundred fifty-three patients whose intraocular pressure was controlled with a timolol maleate ophthalmic solution were studied. Following a baseline period, half were switched (masked and randomized) to treatment with a betaxolol hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and were followed up for 12 weeks. Intraocular pressure, signs, and symptoms were recorded at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Those patients switched to the betaxolol ophthalmic solution had a significant increase in both ocular side effects (burning/stinging and tearing) and intraocular pressure at weeks 4, 8, and 12 when compared with those patients who continued to receive timolol.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of timolol maleate 0.5% gel forming solution (TXE, Merck) versus timolol maleate 0.5% gel forming solution (TXG, Falcon) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients. METHODS: Following a washout period patients were randomly begun on either TXE or TXG each given once each morning for six weeks (Period 1). Patients then were crossed over to the opposite medicine for Period 2. Following each 6-week treatment period the intraocular pressure was obtained at 08:00 trough and +2 and +8 hours post-dosing. Anterior segment staining and photography were performed to assess surface irritation. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study; 28 completed. The diurnal intraocular pressure as well as the 08:00 trough and +2 hour post dosing pressures were statistically equal between groups, although a trend to a lower mean pressure was observed in the TXE (17.9 +/- 3.2 mm Hg) compared to the TXG (18.6 +/- 3.4 mm Hg) group. However, eight hours after dosing the pressure was 17.5 +/- 3.2 mm Hg in the TXE group and 18.9 +/- 3.3 mm Hg in the TXG group (P = 0.0019). Safety was similar between groups, including corneal and conjunctival staining, conjunctival hyperemia graded by anterior segment photography and at the slit lamp, and unsolicited and solicited side effects. Vision recovery after instillation was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: TXE demonstrates a lower intraocular pressure eight hours after dosing than does TXG, but safety appears similar between products.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. A six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe.

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) reducing effect and safety of fixed combination (FC) latanoprost/timolol with unfixed combination (UFC) brimonidine/timolol in patients with increased IOP. METHODS: In this 6 month, randomised, evaluator masked, parallel group European study, patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension and IOP > or =21 mm Hg on monotherapy or >16 mm Hg on dual therapy received either FC latanoprost/timolol at 8:00AM or UFC brimonidine/timolol at 8:00AM and 8:00PM. The primary outcome was the difference from baseline to month 6 in mean diurnal IOP reduction. RESULTS: 325 of 334 randomised patients were included in intent to treat analyses (FC latanoprost/timolol, 163; UFC brimonidine/timolol, 162). Baseline diurnal IOP levels were similar: FC latanoprost/timolol, 26.4 (SD 2.7) mm Hg; UFC brimonidine/timolol, 26.5 (SD 2.8) mm Hg (p = 0.851). At month 6, levels were 16.9 (SD 2.8) mm Hg in FC latanoprost/timolol patients and 18.2 (SD 3.1) mm Hg in UFC brimonidine/timolol patients (p<0.001). No adverse events were reported by 76.4% and 75.5% of patients receiving FC latanoprost/timolol versus UFC brimonidine/timolol, respectively. Larger proportions of brimonidine/timolol treated patients reported study medication related adverse events (18.6% v 7.3%) and discontinued study participation because of this (10.8% v 1.8%). CONCLUSION: Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol administered once daily is both more effective and better tolerated than twice daily dosing with UFC brimonidine/timolol.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of the effects of aqueous and gellan ophthalmic timolol on peak exercise performance in middle-aged men.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of 0.5% aqueous timolol and 0.5% timolol gellan on exercise performance in middle-aged men. METHODS: We evaluated the effects of 0.5% aqueous timolol (timolol solution, administered twice daily, and a 0.5% timolol gellan suspension that forms a gel on application to the conjunctiva (timolol gellan), administered once daily, on exercise performance in 42 healthy men with a mean age of 58 years (range, 55 to 65 years). Serum concentrations of timolol were assayed. Subjects exercised maximally on an upright cycle ergometer four times with ten-day intervals. After baseline testing, subjects were randomly assigned and crossed over in a double-masked manner to two and a half days of treatment with placebo, 0.5% timolol solution, and 0.5% timolol gellan. RESULTS: The serum timolol concentrations immediately after testing were 0.91 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for timolol solution compared to 0.71 +/- 0.46 ng/ml for timolol gellan (P < .05). The change from baseline in resting heart rate was -1.8 +/- 9.3 beats/min (P = .23) for placebo, -11.0 +/- 9.6 beats/min (P < .001) for timolol gellan. The change from baseline in peak heart rate was -0.1 +/- 7.3 beats/min (P = .92) for placebo, -15.6 +/- 5.6 beats/min (P < .001) for timolol solution, and -11.9 +/- 8.0 beats/min (P < .001) for timolol solution, and -8.5 +/- 7. 5 beats/min (P<.001) for timolol gellan. Pair-wise comparison demonstrated significantly less reduction in both resting (P < .05) and peak heart rate (P < .01) for timolol gellan vs timolol solution. CONCLUSIONS: Although both treatments caused reductions in testing and peak heart rate, timolol gellan was associated with significantly less reductions. The significant difference in serum concentrations of timolol between the two treatments is strong evidence that the difference in heart rate response was caused by reduced systemic absorption with timolol gellan.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of the ocular hypotensive effect of brimonidine, dorzolamide, latanoprost, or artificial tears added to timolol in glaucomatous monkey eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the additive ocular hypotensive effect of brimonidine, dorzolamide, latanoprost, or artificial tears to timolol in monkey eyes with laser-induced unilateral glaucoma. METHODS: Eight monkeys were used and each animal received all four combinations of drugs in a randomized fashion during the study. The washout period between each combination was at least 2 weeks. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 8:30 AM, 11:00 AM, 1:00 PM, and 3:30 PM on day 1 (untreated baseline), day 2 (timolol treatment alone), and days 3 through 5 (combination therapy with two drugs). One drop of 0.5% timolol was topically applied at 3:45 PM on day 1 and at 8:45 AM and 3:45 PM on days 2 through 5. One drop of 0.2% brimonidine or 2% dorzolamide or artificial tears was added on day 2 at 4:00 PM and at 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM on days 3 through 5, or latanoprost was added at 9:00 AM on days 3 through 5. RESULTS: Compared with timolol alone, the maximal additive reduction in IOP which occurred on day 5 was 4.8 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (mean +/- standard error of the mean) with timolol plus brimonidine, 5.6 +/- 1.0 mm Hg with timolol plus dorzolamide, 4.3 +/- 1.0 mm Hg with timolol plus latanoprost, and 2.0 +/- 0.5 mm Hg with timolol plus artificial tears (P < 0.01). At all measurements, timolol plus brimonidine, timolol plus dorzolamide, and timolol plus latanoprost caused greater (P < 0.05) IOP reductions than did timolol plus artificial tears. The additive IOP-lowering effect was similar (P > 0.60) when comparing timolol plus brimonidine and timolol plus dorzolamide, timolol plus brimonidine and timolol plus latanoprost, timolol plus dorzolamide and timolol plus latanoprost at all measurements, but timolol plus dorzolamide caused a greater (P < 0.05) reduction of IOP than did timolol plus latanoprost at 0 hours on day 5. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of brimonidine, dorzolamide, or latanoprost to timolol caused similar additional reductions of IOP in glaucomatous monkey eyes.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Studies on the mechanism of action of timolol and on the effects of suppression and redirection of aqueous flow on outflow facility.

Long-term use of drugs that suppress aqueous humor formation, such as timolol and dorzolamide, or that redirect aqueous humor outflow from the trabecular meshwork, such as prostaglandin F2alpha analogues, could cause underperfusion of the trabecular meshwork and a secondary decrease in outflow facility. We investigated the mechanism of suppression of aqueous humor formation by timolol in monkey eyes by measuring aqueous humor ascorbate levels. We also determined whether suppression of aqueous humor formation with and without redirection of aqueous humor away from the trabecular meshwork could lead to a subsequent reduction in outflow facility, and whether this reduction was correlated with increased fibronectin levels in anterior chamber aqueous humor. In cynomolgus monkeys, unilateral dose/aqueous humor formation response curves were generated for timolol, dorzolamide, and a combination of timolol + dorzolamide. Aqueous humor formation and/or outflow facility were measured in both eyes after approximately four days, four weeks and seven weeks of twice daily treatment with 3.5 microg timolol + 1.0 mg dorzolamide to one eye and 30% DMSO to the other. In some monkeys, 5 microg prostaglandin F2alpha-isopropyl ester (PG) was added to timolol + dorzolamide for 4-week treatments. Intraocular pressure and corneal endothelial transfer coefficients (k(a)) were also measured at four weeks. Aqueous humor fibronectin levels were determined in four monkeys after approximately 9.5 weeks of timolol + dorzolamide treatment. Aqueous humor formation, intraocular pressure, and aqueous humor ascorbate levels were also determined in rhesus monkeys at baseline and after a single unilateral topical administration of 25 microg timolol. Compared to baseline for the same eye, aqueous humor formation was significantly decreased in treated eyes at all doses of timolol and at 1.8 and 4 mg dorzolamide. Compared to the opposite control eye, aqueous humor formation was lower in treated eyes after 3.5 and 5 microg timolol and after all doses of dorzolamide. Aqueous humor formation after treatment with 3.5 microg timolol + 1.0 mg dorzolamide was decreased in treated vs. control eyes, after four days and was suppressed in both treated and control eyes after four weeks of treatment, but not when PG was added. There was no difference in k(a) values with or without the addition of PG. Intraocular pressure was significantly lower in both treated and control eyes vs. baseline after approximately 6.5 weeks treatment with timolol + dorzolamide when taken 2 hr after the last dose and after approximately 3.5 weeks treatment with timolol + dorzolamide + PG when measured 6 hr after the last dose. Outflow facility after treatment with timolol + dorzolamide was unchanged after four days, tended to be lower in the treated vs. control eyes after four and seven weeks, and was significantly lower in treated vs. control eyes after four weeks treatment with timolol + dorzolamide + PG (0.352 +/- 0.052 vs. 0.515 +/- 0.096 microl min(-1) mmHg(-1), p < or = 0.02). Both treated vs. control eye aqueous humor fibronectin levels were below the level of detection for our assay (0.01 microg ml(-1)). The 25 microg timolol dose decreased ipsilateral, but not contralateral intraocular pressure (12.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 15.2 +/- 0.9; p < 0.05) and aqueous humor formation (1.40 +/- 0.08 vs. 2.03 +/- 0.09 microg ml(-1), p < or = 0.01). There was no difference in anterior chamber ascorbate levels in treated vs. control eyes or compared to their respective baselines. Our findings indicate that timolol affects neither ciliary epithelial transport of ascorbate nor aqueous fibronectin levels. Our data also indicate that decreasing aqueous humor formation over a period of time can lead to reduction in outflow facility, particularly when combined with therapy that redirects aqueous from the trabecular meshwork. Future intraocular pressure-lowering therapies for glaucoma may better be directed at enhancing flow through the trabecular pathway as opposed to decreasing aqueous humor formation or rerouting aqueous humor away from the trabecular meshwork.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Timolol concentrations in rat ocular tissues and plasma after topical and intraperitoneal dosing.

PURPOSE: Topical beta-blockers, such as timolol, have been used extensively in the medical treatment of glaucoma to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Recently, these drugs have been shown to have effects on the retinal and optic nerve circulation as well as potential neuroprotective properties. In the current study, the concentration of timolol attained in the cornea, iris-ciliary body, retina, vitreous, and plasma was measured after topical or intraperitoneal administration in rats to determine the relative contributions of each route to intraocular timolol concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One group of rats received one drop of commercially available 0.5% timolol in the right eye and two drops in the left eye for 3 to 12 days. Another group of rats received one drop of 0.5% timolol in one eye only and concentrations were studied in the ocular tissues at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after instillation. The final group of rats received a single intraperitoneal injection of timolol ranging in concentration from 5 to 75 mg/kg after which tissue and plasma concentrations were measured 30 minutes after injection. All tissue and plasma concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Rats that received topical timolol daily for 3 to 12 consecutive days accumulated timolol concentrations of 2.3 to 4.4 microg/g in cornea, 198 to 326 microg/g in iris, 0.05 to 0.11 microg/ml in vitreous, and 0.17 to 0.77 microg/g in retina. In rats that received a single drop of timolol in one eye, the tissue concentrations were higher in the treated eye than in the untreated eye in all cases except for vitreous. In these experiments, timolol levels in plasma were either low or not detectable. Increasing timolol doses administered intraperitoneally resulted in corresponding increased tissue and plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Absorption of drug into the systemic circulation plays a significant role in delivering timolol to the retina and vitreous in addition to a local ocular route. A clear dose-response relationship exists in all ocular tissues studied after an intraperitoneal dose of timolol. High doses of timolol were required to achieve measurable concentrations of drug in the ocular tissues via our high performance liquid chromatography assay suggesting that a significant hepatic first-pass effect may be involved after an intraperitoneal injection of timolol.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

A prospective study of the effects of prolonged timolol therapy on alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor and angiotensin II receptor mediated responses in normal subjects.

AIMS: Long-term treatment with beta 1-selective adrenergic antagonists gives rise to cross-sensitisation of cardiac beta 2-adrenoceptor responses, with no corresponding alteration in beta 1-adrenoceptor responses. We performed a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study of the effects of nonselective beta-blockade with timolol on alpha-adrenergic and angiotensin II receptor mediated responses in normal subjects. We also wished to study the time course of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic responses after withdrawal of timolol. METHODS: Six healthy males received timolol 10 mg twice daily or placebo for 14 days. On day 11 of treatment, vascular alpha 1-, alpha 2- and angiotensin II receptor responses were assessed by measuring the blood pressure increases in response to intravenous phenylephrine, alpha-methylnoradrenaline and angiotensin amide respectively, following one dose of timolol 10 mg (to block the beta-adrenergic effects of phenylephrine and alpha-methylnoradrenaline). Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased in response to each of these drugs, but these increases were not different on timolol treatment or placebo. Following cessation of treatment with timolol or placebo, beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor mediated responses were assessed by measuring the heart rate responses to treadmill exercise and intravenous salbutamol infusion respectively. Half each of the subjects underwent this 2 days and 3 days respectively, after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Both exercise-induced and salbutamol-induced tachycardia were not different following placebo or 3 days following the end of timolol treatment. However, 2 days following timolol treatment, both were attenuated; the reduction in salbutamol-induced tachycardia was significant, whilst the reduction in exercise tachycardia did not reach statistical significance. We also measured metabolic responses to exercise and to salbutamol infusion. Exercise induced a rise in plasma potassium and noradrenaline. Salbutamol produced a fall in plasma potassium, a rise in plasma glucose and insulin and also a rise in plasma noradrenaline. All of these changes were not different following placebo or 3 days after the end of timolol treatment; by contrast, 2 days following timolol treatment, all were significantly attenuated, with the exception of the rise in plasma glucose. In addition, the rise in both plasma glucose and insulin in response to an oral load of 75 g glucose were not different post-placebo, 2 or 3 days post-timolol. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that, following 14 days of nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockade with timolol, there is evidence of residual beta-adrenoceptor blockade 2 days after drug withdrawal; this finding is in contrast with the known plasma profile of timolol (half-life 3-6 hours), but is consistent with our previous observations of the slow speeds of association and dissociation of timolol with beta-adrenoceptors in vitro. There is no evidence, in this study, of beta-adrenergic sensitisation following timolol withdrawal, nor of cross-regulation of vascular alpha 1-, alpha 2- or angiotensin II receptors in response to nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockade.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1992

Cardiac effects of different eyedrop preparations of timolol in rabbits.

Coadministration of phenylephrine and increasing solution viscosity can decrease systemic timolol absorption after eyedrop application. In this study, changes in the heart rate of rabbits after non-viscous (1 cP) and viscous timolol-phenylephrine (330 cP) solution were compared with those after control timolol eyedrops. The resting heart rate of rabbits was not influenced by control timolol eyedrops (0.6 mg/ml, 25 microliters in both eyes). In contrast, control timolol eyedrops antagonized greatly isoproterenol-induced tachycardia for 120 min. Timolol (0.6 mg/ml)-phenylephrine (0.8 mg/ml) eyedrops (25 microliters in both eyes) antagonized the chronotropic effect of isoproterenol less than control timolol eyedrops for the first 10 min. Compared to control timolol eyedrops, administration of viscous timolol (0.3 mg/ml)-phenylephrine (0.8 mg/ml) solution (25 microliters in both eyes) lowered systemic beta-blocking activity of timolol for 120 min. Previously we have shown that compared to non-viscous (1 cP) timolol (5.0 mg/ml) eyedrop (25 microliters), viscous (330 cP) timolol (2.5 mg/ml)-phenylephrine (0.8 mg/ml) solution (25 microliters) results in equal or increased timolol concentrations in the ocular tissues. All three timolol eyedrops antagonized the isoproterenol-induced tachycardia more than buffer solution but the onset of significant beta-blocking effect induced by eyedrops varied from 3 min (control eyedrop) to 40 min (viscous eyedrop). Our results indicate that possible cardiac effects of ophthalmic timolol can be diminished by phenylephrine coadministration and increased solution viscosity.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of aqueous and gellan ophthalmic timolol with placebo on the 24-hour heart rate response in patients on treatment for glaucoma.

PURPOSE: Topical beta-blocker treatment is routine therapy in the management of patients with glaucoma. Therapy results in systemic absorption, however, the degree of reduction of resting and peak heart rate has not been quantified. DESIGN: This trial evaluated the effect of placebo, 0.5% aqueous timolol (timolol solution) and a 0.5% timolol suspension that forms a gel on application to the conjunctiva (timolol gellan) on the 24-hour heart rate in patients currently being treated for glaucoma to quantify the reduction in mean heart rate. METHODS: Forty-three Caucasian patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with a mean (+/-SD) age of 63 (+/-8) years were randomized and crossed over in a double-masked manner to 14 days of treatment with placebo (morning and evening in both eyes), timolol solution (morning and evening in both eyes), or timolol gellan (morning in both eyes with placebo in the evening). On the 13th day of each period, heart rate was recorded continuously during a typical, ambulant 24-hour period. RESULTS: Both timolol solution and timolol gellan reduced the mean 24-hour heart rate compared with placebo (P < or = .001), and this reduction was most pronounced during the daytime (-7.5% change in mean heart rate, -5.7 beats/min). Timolol gellan showed a numerically but not significantly smaller reduction in 24-hour heart rate, compared with timolol solution. During the night, the mean 12-hour heart rate on placebo and timolol gellan were both significantly less than on timolol solution; the difference between solution and gellan treatments was statistically significant (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Both timolol solution and timolol gellan decrease the mean 24-hour heart rate compared with placebo. This response was most pronounced during the active daytime period. These data quantify the modest bradycardia associated with ophthalmic beta-blocker therapy in a typical patient population on therapy for glaucoma. Although exercise performance was not assessed in this trial, reductions of this magnitude should not have substantial clinical consequences.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗