SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Treatment of migraine attacks with sumatriptan.

BACKGROUND: The headache in migraine attacks may be caused by dilatation of certain cranial arteries or arteriovenous anastomoses, by neurogenic dural plasma extravasation, or by both of these mechanisms. Sumatriptan, a novel selective agonist of 5-hydroxytryptamine-like receptors, blocks these phenomena. We investigated its efficacy in migraine. METHODS: We studied 639 patients with migraine attacks in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. We assessed the effect of subcutaneous injections of 6 or 8 mg of sumatriptan or placebo on the severity of headache and associated migrane symptoms 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatment. Patients who were not free of pain after 60 minutes subsequently received placebo if they had initially received placebo or 8 mg of sumatriptan, and 6 mg of sumatriptan or placebo if they had initially received 6 mg of sumatriptan. RESULTS: After 60 minutes, the severity of headache was decreased in 72 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 68 to 76 percent) of the 422 patients given 6 mg of sumatriptan, 79 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 71 to 87 percent) of the 109 patients given 8 mg of sumatriptan, and 25 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 17 to 33 percent) of the 105 patients given placebo (data on 3 patients could not be evaluated). As compared with the placebo group, 47 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 57 percent) more patients who had received 6 mg of sumatriptan and 54 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 43 to 65 percent) more patients who had received 8 mg of sumatriptan had a decrease in the severity of headache (P less than 0.001 for both comparisons). After 120 minutes, 86 to 92 percent of the 511 patients treated with sumatriptan (202 assigned to 6 mg plus placebo, 203 to 6 mg plus 6 mg, and 106 to 8 mg plus placebo) had improvement in the severity of headache, as compared with only 37 percent of the 104 patients who received placebo once or twice (P less than 0.001 for all comparisons). Twenty-one patients were excluded from the analysis because of missing data (19) or protocol violations (2). The response rates did not differ significantly among the sumatriptan regimens. Adverse events were minor and transient in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a single 6-mg dose of sumatriptan given subcutaneously is a highly effective, rapid-acting, and well-tolerated treatment for migrane attacks. The administration of a second dose 60 minutes later to patients not responding well to an initial dose affords little additional benefit.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Sumatriptan injection reduces productivity loss during a migraine attack: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of sumatriptan succinate injection compared with placebo on productivity loss during a migraine attack in the workplace. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. SETTING: Fifteen clinical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five patients 18 years and older diagnosed as having migraine according to International Headache Society criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients self-administered sumatriptan injection (6 mg) or matching placebo to treat a moderate or severe migraine occurring within the first 4 hours of a minimum 8-hour work shift. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean productivity loss 2 hours after dosing and across the work shift; percentages of patients returning to normal work performance within 2 hours after dosing and across the work shift; percentages of patients experiencing headache relief (reduction of moderate or severe predose pain to mild or no pain) 1 and 2 hours after dosing. RESULTS: Mean productivity loss was significantly (P< or =.002) lower in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group both during the 2-hour postdose period (sumatriptan, 39 minutes; placebo, 54 minutes) and across the work shift (sumatriptan, 86 minutes; placebo, 168 minutes). Significantly (P<.001) greater percentages of patients in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group returned to normal work performance by 2 hours after dosing (sumatriptan, 52%; placebo, 9%) and across the work shift (sumatriptan, 66%; placebo, 18%). Significantly (P< or =.001) greater percentages of patients in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group experienced headache relief 1 hour after dosing (sumatriptan, 69%; placebo, 18%) and 2 hours after dosing (sumatriptan, 79%; placebo, 32%). CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan reduced migraine-associated productivity loss during a minimum 8-hour work shift by approximately 50% compared with placebo and alleviated headache in more than three fourths of patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Single dose pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan in healthy volunteers.

Sumatriptan is classified as a vascular 5HT1 receptor agonist and is effective in the acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache. Sumatriptan is available as an injection for subcutaneous administration and as a tablet for oral administration. The pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan differ depending on the route of administration. The mean subcutaneous bioavailability is 96% compared to 14% for the oral tablet. The lower bioavailability following oral administration is due mainly to presystemic metabolism. The inter-subject variability in plasma sumatriptan concentrations is greater following oral administration and a faster rate of absorption of drug into the systemic circulation is achieved following subcutaneous dosing. The pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan are linear up to a subcutaneous dose of 16 mg. Following oral dosing up to 400 mg, the pharmacokinetics are also linear, with the exception of rate of absorption, as indicated by a dose dependent increase in time to peak concentration. Sumatriptan is a highly cleared compound that is eliminated from the body primarily by metabolism to the pharmacologically inactive indoleacetic acid analogue. Both sumatriptan and its metabolite are excreted in the urine. Although the renal clearance of sumatriptan is only 20% of the total clearance, it exceeds the glomerular filtration rate, indicating that sumatriptan undergoes active renal tubular secretion. Sumatriptan has a large apparent volume of distribution (170 l) and an elimination half-life of 2 h. Oral doses of sumatriptan were administered as a solution of dispersible tablets and subcutaneous dosing was by injection into the arm. In clinical practice, sumatriptan is administered as a film coated tablet or by subcutaneous injection into the thigh.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan injection for the treatment of morning migraine: two multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled studies in adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan injection in the treatment of morning migraine. METHODS: In 2 multicenter (20 sites for study 1 and 25 sites for study 2), randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group studies, male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years with migraine meeting International Headache Society criteria received SC sumatriptan succinate injection 6 mg or inactive vehicle (control) for the outpatient treatment of a single morning migraine, defined as migraine with moderate or severe pain on awakening. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who achieved pain-free relief (moderate or severe pain reduced to no pain) at 2 hours after treatment. Tolerability was assessed using spontaneous reporting or noted by a clinician during the studies, assessed at the return visit. RESULTS: The efficacy analysis included, in the succinate group, 145 patients in study 1, 148 in study 2; control, 152 in study 1, 139 in study 2. The mean (SD) ages in the sumatriptan group were 40.2 (9.7) and 38.8 (10.1) years in studies 1 and 2, respectively; control, 41.4 (10.4) and 39.3 (9.7) years. The majority of patients in the 2 studies were female (sumatriptan, 84% and 93% in studies 1 and 2, respectively; control, 82% and 81%) and white (sumatriptan, 83% and 81%; control, 78% and 89%). Two hours after treatment, 48% and 57% of patients treated with sumatriptan injection compared with 18% and 19% of control patients reported pain-free relief in studies 1 and 2, respectively (both, P < 0.001). Two hours after treatment, 72% and 77% of patients treated with sumatriptan injection reported headache relief (moderate or severe pain reduced to mild or no pain) compared with 32% and 41% of control patients (both, P < 0.001). Onset of efficacy versus control (the first time point with statistical significance of pain relief) was observed beginning 10 minutes postdose (P < 0.05 sumatriptan injection vs placebo across pooled studies). Mean time to efficacy in the sumatriptan group was 10 minutes (P < 0.05 vs controls). The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (sumatriptan, 6% and 4%; control, 2% and 2%) and injection-site reaction (ie, burning or stinging at the injection site) (sumatriptan, 5 % and 5%; control, 2% and 1%). Injection-site reaction was also the only adverse event considered treatment related and reported in > or =5 % of all patients. CONCLUSION: The results of these 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled studies suggest that sumatriptan injection was effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of morning migraine in these adults.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Cerebral and ocular hemodynamic effects of sumatriptan in the nitroglycerin headache model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sumatriptan is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1d (5-HT1d)-receptor agonist, highly effective in the short-term treatment of migraine headaches. However, the mechanism underlying the action of sumatriptan is not yet completely understood. To further characterize the vascular effects of sumatriptan, we studied the effects on cerebral and ocular circulation in the well-established nitroglycerin headache model. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study in 10 healthy male subjects, we administered either placebo plus nitroglycerin or sumatriptan plus nitroglycerin. Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery and the ophthalmic artery, as well as ocular fundus pulsations and systemic hemodynamic parameters, were measured after sumatriptan and placebo and during the following infusion of nitroglycerin. RESULTS: After infusion of nitroglycerin, blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral decreased by -13.3% versus baseline after placebo pretreatment, but by only -2.2% after sumatriptan (treatment effect, +10.8%; p < 0.05). In contrast, sumatriptan had no effect in the ophthalmic artery. Ocular fundus pulsations, which estimate local pulsatile ocular blood flow, were slightly reduced after sumatriptan. Moreover, sumatriptan partially prevented the increase in fundus pulsations during nitroglycerin infusion (treatment effect, -5.4%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan prevents the effect of nitroglycerin-induced vasodilation in the middle cerebral artery but not in the ophthalmic artery, which strongly supports the concept that sumatriptan directly vasoconstricts distended basal cerebral arteries. Measurement of ocular fundus pulsations indicates that sumatriptan also has a small vasoconstrictor action on resistance vessels.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Mechanism of actions of sumatriptan on coronary flow before and after endothelial dysfunction in guinea-pig isolated heart.

1. The mechanism of action of sumatriptan on coronary flow was examined before and after two different forms of endothelial ablation in guinea-pig isolated hearts. The mechanism was assessed in terms of the influence of the integrity of the coronary endothelium, the role of release of nitric oxide (NO) from the endothelium, and the receptor subtypes mediating the effects. 2. Continuous perfusion with sumatriptan reduced coronary flow, but the concentration-response curve was v-shaped. Sumatriptan (0.001-0.1 microM) caused a concentration-dependent decrease in coronary flow with the maximum effect achieved at 0.23 +/- 0.04 microM. The pEC50 was 8.49 +/- 0.07. At higher concentrations (0.1-10 microM) there was a concentration-dependent diminution of the vasoconstrictor effect. Endothelial ablation by saponin removed the diminution in the vasoconstrictor effect. In contrast pretreatment with NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (100 microM. 45 min perfusion) did not affect it. This was despite both saponin and L-NAME being effective in reducing basal release of NO into the coronary effluent (measured by chemiluminescence) to the same extent (71 +/- 3 and 73 +/- 2%, respectively). 3. GR127935, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1D (5-HT1D) receptor antagonist (3 and 10 nM), which by itself had no effect on coronary flow or NO release, antagonized the vasoconstrictor response to sumatriptan and unmasked a sumatriptan-induced concentration-dependent increase in coronary flow and NO release. These increases in coronary flow and NO release were abolished by pretreatment with either saponin or L-NAME. 4. Mesulergine, a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist which had no effect by itself on basal coronary flow or NO release, inhibited the vasodilator response to sumatriptan that occurred in the presence of GR127935, and actually enhanced the vasoconstrictor response, increasing the max mum fall in coronary flow from -3.9 +/- 0.4 to -5.2 +/- 0.4 ml min-1 g-1 (P < 0.05). The diminution of vasoconstrictor effect of sumatriptan was abolished by mesulergine and by pretreatment with saponin, but not by L-NAME. 5. In conclusion, guinea-pig coronary arteries constrict to low concentrations of sumatriptan, causing a reduction in coronary flow. This effect appears to be caused by 5-HT1D agonism with the receptors located on the coronary vascular smooth muscle. With higher concentrations of sumatriptan this is partially offset by a weaker vasodilator effect, which is caused by low affinity 5-HT2 agonism. Although this effect is endothelium-dependent. It is not caused by the release of NO. Interestingly, when the vasoconstrictor effect of sumatriptan was inhibited by the 5-HT1D antagonist GR127935, a high affinity vasodilator effect of sumatriptan was unmasked. This is 5-HT2 receptor mediated and is caused by release of NO from the coronary endothelium. 6. In man, sumatriptan, and 5-HT may both be capable of causing pathogenic coronary vasoconstriction. The implications of the present data are that the scope for this may depend greatly on (i) the extent of underlying endothelial dysfunction, (ii) the extent of endothelial 5-HT2 receptor-mediated release of vasodilator autacoids (which include NO) and (iii) the extent of smooth muscle 5-HT1D receptor-mediated vasoconstriction.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Acupuncture versus placebo versus sumatriptan for early treatment of migraine attacks: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether acupuncture is superior to placebo and equivalent to sumatriptan for the early treatment of an acute migraine attack. DESIGN: Randomized, partly double-blind (sumatriptan versus placebo) trial. SETTING: Two hospitals in Germany (one specialized in traditional Chinese medicine and one in the treatment of headache). SUBJECTS: A total of 179 migraineurs experiencing the first symptoms of a developing migraine attack. INTERVENTIONS: Traditional Chinese acupuncture, sumatriptan (6 mg subcutaneously) or placebo injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of patients in whom a full migraine attack (defined as severe migraine headache) within 48 h was prevented. In patients who developed a migraine attack in spite of early treatment, acupuncture and sumatriptan were applied a second time, whilst patients initially randomized to placebo received sumatriptan. RESULTS: A full migraine attack was prevented in 21 of 60 (35%) patients receiving acupuncture, 21 of 58 (36%) patients receiving sumatriptan and 11 of 61 (18%) patients receiving placebo (relative risk of having a full attack 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.99) for acupuncture versus placebo, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.98) for sumatriptan versus placebo). Response to the second intervention in patients who developed a full attack was better with sumatriptan (17/31 patients who received sumatriptan twice and 37/46 patients who had had placebo first) than with acupuncture (4/31). The number of patients reporting side-effects was 14 in the acupuncture group, 23 in the sumatriptan group and 10 in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial acupuncture and sumatriptan were more effective than a placebo injection in the early treatment of an acute migraine attack. When an attack could not be prevented, sumatriptan was more effective than acupuncture at relieving headache.

Acupuncture Therapy↗

PubMed1998

Efficacy and adverse events of subcutaneous, oral, and intranasal sumatriptan used for migraine treatment: a systematic review based on number needed to treat.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, speed of onset, and adverse events of 6 mg subcutaneous, 100 mg oral, and 20 mg intranasal sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine attacks. DESIGN: Systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. DATA SOURCES: Thirty trials up to April 1997 retrieved from a systematic literature search (Medline, review papers, handsearching of journals, congress proceedings, manufacturer's database); no restriction on language. OUTCOME PARAMETERS: Numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated for relief of headache and for adverse events (when data were available). Therapeutic gain was used to evaluate speed of onset of action. RESULTS: Subcutaneous sumatriptan was more efficacious, combined number needed to treat 2.0 at 1 h, than oral (3.0 at 2 h) and intranasal sumatriptan (3.1 at 2 h). For adverse events, the NNT was 3.0 for subcutaneous and 8.3 for oral sumatriptan. Only limited data on adverse events for intranasal sumatriptan were available. Therapeutic gain analysis during the first 2 h showed that subcutaneous sumatriptan was the fastest-acting form of administration. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous sumatriptan in a dose of 6 mg is significantly more efficacious than 100 mg of oral sumatriptan, but causes more adverse events than oral sumatriptan. Subcutaneous sumatriptan is the form with the quickest onset of action. Intranasal sumatriptan has the same efficacy as oral sumatriptan and a quicker onset of action than the oral form, but with a limited therapeutic effect for the first 30 min after administration.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed1998

Dosing of oral sumatriptan: a review of our first 104 patients.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of oral sumatriptan in the United States at doses of 25 and 50 mg, compared with 100-mg tablets worldwide, has created the need to develop a protocol for appropriate dosing. METHODS: We evaluated the first 104 patients in our practice to treat two migraine attacks with oral sumatriptan. For their first treatment with oral sumatriptan, patients were evaluated on their response to 25-mg tablets and the total number of tablets taken. For their second treatment, patients were evaluated on their response to sumatriptan, number of 25-mg tablets taken, and dosage prescribed for future migraines. RESULTS: [table see text] After the second treatment, 41 patients (40%) continued therapy with 25-mg tablets, 54 (53%) were prescribed 50-mg tablets, 2 patients (2%) were prescribed two 50-mg tablets, and 5 patients (5%) were prescribed injectable sumatriptan. Seventy patients had previously used injectable sumatriptan, while 34 had not previously used sumatriptan. There were no significant differences in their response to oral sumatriptan. CONCLUSION: Oral sumatriptan was effective in clinical practice at doses of 25 and 50 mg. The majority of patients required more than one 25-mg tablet for a migraine attack, reflecting both inadequacy of dosing for some migraines and recurrence of headache, yet 40% of patients continued on treatment with 25-mg tablets. There were no significant differences in response to therapy in patients being switched from injectable to oral sumatriptan compared with those initiating therapy with oral sumatriptan. Both tablet strengths of oral sumatriptan are useful in clinical practice.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Sumatriptan plus metoclopramide in triptan-nonresponsive migraineurs.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of combination treatment using sumatriptan plus metoclopramide versus sumatriptan alone for the treatment of acute migraine. The patients who were treated had failed to respond to triptans in the past despite adequate doses on at least 2 separate trials of the same triptan or 2 trials involving different triptans. BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence that dopaminergic antagonists may benefit the migraineur by relieving migraine pain and associated symptoms. The exact mechanism of action in migraine is unknown. The postulated action is the inhibition of dopaminergic overactivity. A dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, may improve the efficacy of a 5-HT1B/1D agonist, sumatriptan. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 16 adult migraineurs fulfilling International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine with or without aura who had failed to receive adequate relief from triptans treated one migraine with each treatment: sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg or sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo to match metoclopramide. Patients treated their migraines when they were moderate or severe in intensity and recorded pain severity and symptoms prior to treatment and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment. RESULTS: Thirteen women and 3 men (mean age, 40 years) completed the study; ie, treated 2 migraines (a total of 32 migraines), one attack with each treatment. Meaningful relief was attained in 10 (63%) of 16 migraines treated with the combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg compared with 5 (31%) of 16 migraines treated with sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo. Headache response (moderate or severe to mild or no pain at 2 hours) was achieved in 7 (44%) of 16 migraines with the combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg compared with 5 (31%) of 16 migraines treated with sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo. There did not appear to be a difference between treatment groups with respect to associated symptoms. The combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Combining sumatriptan with metoclopramide provided relief in some migraineurs who failed to achieve adequate relief with a triptan alone. It remains unknown whether initiating therapy when pain was mild or using a higher dose of sumatriptan (ie, 100 mg) would have provided additional benefit. Further studies are indicated.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Oral sumatriptan for the acute treatment of probable migraine: first randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan tablets in adults who meet International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for probable migraine but who do not meet IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura. BACKGROUND: Headaches with some but not all of the features of migraine meet criteria for probable migraine, a form of migraine recognized by the IHS. Probable migraine attacks are also prevalent and frequently underdiagnosed. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Adults (18 to 65 years) with a 1-year history of headaches that met 2004 IHS criteria for probable migraine without aura (same operational definition as 1988 IHS migrainous disorder) were eligible for enrollment. All patients were triptan- and ergot-naïve and had never been diagnosed with migraine. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to receive sumatriptan 25, 50, or 100 mg conventional tablets or matching placebo and were instructed to treat a single moderate or severe probable migraine attack. A post hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the population of patients who achieved headache relief sustained throughout the immediate posttreatment period. Patients who reported relief within 2 hours and subsequently lost headache relief within 4 hours were considered nonresponders. RESULTS: At 2 hours, more patients treated with sumatriptan achieved headache relief, the primary efficacy measure, compared with placebo, but differences only approached statistical significance for 100 mg (P= .053). The 2-hour headache relief rate in the sumatriptan 25 or 50 mg groups was not significantly different than placebo. The time to use of rescue was significantly shorter in the placebo group compared with the sumatriptan 100 mg group (P= .002). The time to use of rescue in the sumatriptan 25 or 50 mg groups was not significantly different than placebo. More patients treated with placebo (22%) lost headache relief within 4 hours compared with patients treated with sumatriptan 25 mg (17%), 50 mg (14%), or 100 mg (7%). A post hoc analysis demonstrated that at 2 hours, headache relief sustained through 4 hours (S 0-4 hours) was achieved in 44%, 49%, and 57% of patients treated with sumatriptan 25, 50, and 100 mg, respectively, compared with 34% of patients treated with placebo (P < .05 for sumatriptan 50 and 100 mg vs. placebo). All doses of sumatriptan were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oral sumatriptan may be effective and is well tolerated for the acute treatment of probable migraine without aura, however, the difference between sumatriptan and placebo was not statistically significant for the a priori defined primary endpoint.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1997

Studies to assess if pizotifen prophylaxis improves migraine beyond the benefit offered by acute sumatriptan therapy alone.

Two multi-centre studies-one double-blind, placebo-controlled (study 1) and one open (study 2)-were set up to assess if pizotifen prophylaxis improved migraine beyond the benefit offered by acute sumatriptan therapy alone. Eighty-eight patients completed the blinded study and 63 patients completed the open study. Both studies were of crossover design with patients undertaking a 4 week run-in period prior to a 12-week treatment period. Following a 4-week washout period patients commenced a second 12-week treatment period on the alternative treatment regimen. All breakthrough attacks were treated with 100 mg oral sumatriptan with an optional 2 doses available to treat any recurrence within 24 h of taking dose 1. Pizotifen was built up to a final daily dose of 1.5 mg over a 2-week period and patients remained on this dose for a further 10 weeks. Patients in the blinded study were given matching placebo tablets for one of the two treatment periods. The efficacy of sumatriptan was not affected by pizotifen. The median of the monthly attack rate experienced by patients was slightly lower whilst patients were on pizotifen and sumatriptan than while on placebo prophylaxis and sumatriptan or sumatriptan alone; study 1, 3.5 vs 3.9 attacks per month (p = 0.008); study 2, 2.9 vs. 3.2 attacks per month (p = 0.23). Also, while on pizotifen and sumatriptan more patients had a greater proportion of their time in the study migraine-free. From the results of these studies it does not appear that pizotifen reduces migraine severity; regardless of the treatment regimen the initial headache severity of most attacks was moderate. Weight gains experienced by patients while on pizotifen and sumatriptan were greater than the weight gains experienced while on placebo prophylaxis and sumatriptan or sumatriptan alone (period 1); study 1, 2.6 vs. 1.0 kg (p = 0.002); study 2, 1.6 vs. -0.8 kg (p < 0.0001). The combination of pizotifen and sumatriptan did not result in any additional adverse events other than those usually seen with each medication alone. In these studies, where the average number of migraine attacks was around 4 per month, the benefits conferred by pizotifen were at the expense of the adverse events associated with the drug, particularly weight gain. Therefore the clinical benefit of treatment with pizotifen for patients who have less than 4 attacks per month should be carefully reviewed as acute treatment with sumatriptan may be the most appropriate treatment. Pizotifen may be better reserved for those patients who have 4 of more attacks per month.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Sumatriptan: a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and associated drug interactions of the novel antimigraine drug sumatriptan are reviewed. DATA SOURCES: English-language publications pertaining to sumatriptan were identified via a search of the MEDLINE computerized database. STUDY SELECTION: Open and controlled clinical studies were reviewed in assessing clinical efficacy, although only the results of controlled, randomized trials from the basis for the conclusions pertaining to the effectiveness of sumatriptan. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary measure of drug effectiveness in all clinical studies was significant improvement in headache severity scores. Secondary measures included functional ability, time to relief, rescue medication use, associated symptoms of nausea/vomiting and photo/phonophobia, and, in some studies, headache recurrence rate. These data were obtained from each published clinical trial and used in the overall analysis of sumatriptan efficacy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sumatriptan is a serotonin agonist that has been studied for the acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache. The drug appears to work via specific serotonin receptors to mediate selective vasoconstriction within the cranial vasculature and to prevent the release of inflammatory mediators from trigeminal nerve terminals. The recommended dose of sumatriptan is 6 mg given subcutaneously at the onset of headache; an oral formulation is under investigation. In the published clinical trials of the oral and subcutaneous dosage forms to date, sumatriptan was effective in reducing headache severity from moderate/severe to mild/absent in approximately 70-80 percent of patients treated with active drug, compared with only 20-30 percent in the placebo groups, and 48 percent in the oral ergotamine tartrate/caffeine (Cafergot)-treated group. Secondary measures of effectiveness also favored sumatriptan. There may be a higher rate of headache recurrence with sumatriptan compared with placebo or Cafergot, although further study is necessary to confirm this observation. Adverse effects associated with sumatriptan administration generally were mild and transient and included tingling, warm/hot sensations, and pressure and tightness in the chest and neck. No significant drug interactions have yet been identified. CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan appears to represent a safe and effective alternative to the ergot alkaloids for the abortive treatment of acute migraine. However, further clinical trials, especially those yielding comparative data with current antimigraine agents, are needed to determine the full therapeutic contribution of sumatriptan.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2004

Effects of a fast disintegrating/rapid release oral formulation of sumatriptan on functional ability in patients with migraine.

BACKGROUND: A new oral form of sumatriptan has been developed to facilitate tablet disintegration and drug dispersion and to mitigate the effects of gastric stasis that can accompany migraine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects on functional ability of the new fast disintegrating/rapid release formulation of sumatriptan. METHODS: Sumatriptan 50 mg (n = 137), 100 mg (n = 142), or placebo (n = 153) was administered early when pain was mild for the acute treatment of a single migraine attack in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. For this report, main health-outcomes endpoints (which were secondary endpoints for this clinical trial that was primarily designed to assess pain-free efficacy) included functional ability measured through 2 h postdose on a 5-point scale and lost time equivalents, a composite measure of migraine-associated time missed from activities, and reduced effectiveness at activities through 24 h postdose. RESULTS: Normal functional ability was restored in a significantly (p < 0.05) greater percentage of patients treated with sumatriptan than placebo beginning 45 min postdose for sumatriptan 100 mg and 1 h postdose for sumatriptan 50 mg. During the 24 h after initial dosing, the median (range) lost time equivalents for the combination of paid work activities and activities outside of paid work were significantly lower in the groups treated with sumatriptan (1.1 [0-10] sumatriptan 100 mg; 0.8 [0-36] sumatriptan 50 mg) compared with placebo (2.9 [0-24]) (p < or = 0.01 each sumatriptan group versus placebo). The corresponding mean +/- SD values for lost time equivalents were 1.9 +/- 2.3 and 2.5 +/- 4.7 for sumatriptan 100 mg and 50 mg, respectively, compared with 3.5 +/- 4.3 for placebo. CONCLUSION: A new oral sumatriptan formulation confers rapid, sustained restoration of functional ability in the acute treatment of migraine so that patients can return rapidly to normal functioning at work and outside of work.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Cost-effectiveness of sumatriptan in a managed care population.

We conducted an open-labeled study to determine whether sumatriptan is more cost-effective than other therapies used to treat migraine headache. We contacted by phone 220 sumatriptan users enrolled in QualMed, a health maintenance organization (HMO) in Spokane, Washington. Of these, 203 met the inclusion criteria and 164 (81%) completed our telephone survey. The main outcome measures were healthcare costs to the HMO and number of days free of migraine-related disability before and after sumatriptan treatment. Before sumatriptan treatment, 89% of patients reported severe migraine, compared with 63% after sumatriptan treatment. The number of monthly migraine disability days decreased from 6.5 days per month before sumatriptan to 3.9 days per month after sumatriptan. Healthcare utilization rates (ie, number of hospitalizations, emergency department visits) and costs were lower after the patients began taking sumatriptan. The number of different over-the-counter medicines and prescription medications (other than sumatriptan) taken for migraine disabilities decreased. Although total drug expenditures per month increased, the total migraine healthcare expenditure was 41% lower after sumatriptan was initiated. The cost-effectiveness ratio was 47% more favorable after patients started taking sumatriptan. Overall, patients reported fewer migraine-related disabilities, had lower migraine severity scores, and used fewer healthcare resources when taking sumatriptan. These changes resulted in a better cost-effectiveness ratio for migraine treatment.

Cost of Illness↗

PubMed1992

Sumatriptan: a new drug for vascular headache.

The role of serotonin in the pathogenesis of migraine is discussed, and the chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of sumatriptan are reviewed. Sumatriptan, which is structurally related to the neurotransmitter serotonin, is a serotonin type-1-like-receptor agonist that has a selective but heterogeneous effect on the carotid arterial system. Sumatriptan has a rapid onset of action and a large volume of distribution. Its subcutaneous bioavailability approaches 100%, and its mean terminal half-life is two hours. Studies have shown that both subcutaneous sumatriptan and oral sumatriptan are superior to placebo in relieving migraine and cluster headaches. Studies comparing oral sumatriptan with either ergotamine tartrate plus caffeine (Cafergot) or aspirin plus metoclopramide indicated that sumatriptan relieved headache more quickly and effectively; however, the dosages of these other agents may have been suboptimal. Sumatriptan is generally well tolerated by patients, and most dose-related effects are mild and transient. The most common adverse effect is pain at the injection site. No drug interactions have been identified so far. Subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg and oral sumatriptan 100 mg seem to offer the best benefit-to-risk ratio, although dosage and administration information is limited. Subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan are effective in aborting moderate to severe migraine and cluster headaches and their associated symtpoms. However, more studies are necessary to compare sumatriptan's efficacy with that of other treatments before it can be recommended as first-line therapy for migraine.

Cluster Headache↗

PubMed2001

Comparison of preference for rizatriptan 10-mg wafer versus sumatriptan 50-mg tablet in migraine.

Rizatriptan (MAXALT, a registered trademark of Merck & Co. Inc.) is a selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with rapid oral absorption and early onset of action in the acute treatment of migraine. This randomized, open-label, crossover outpatient study assessed the preference of 481 patients for rizatriptan 10-mg rapidly disintegrating tablets versus sumatriptan (IMIGRAN, a registered trademark of GlaxoWellcome PLC) 50-mg tablets in the treatment of a single migraine attack with each therapy. Almost twice as many patients preferred rizatriptan 10-mg rapidly disintegrating tablet to sumatriptan 50-mg tablet (64.3 vs. 35.7%, p < or = 0.001). Faster relief of headache pain was the most important reason for the preference, cited by 46.9% of patients preferring rizatriptan and 43.4% of patients who preferred sumatriptan. Headache relief at 2 h was 75.9% with rizatriptan and 66.6% with sumatriptan (p < or = 0.001), with rizatriptan being superior to sumatriptan within 30 min of dosing. Fifty-five percent of patients were pain free 2 h after rizatriptan, compared with 42.1% treated with sumatriptan (p < or = 0.001), rizatriptan being superior within 1 h of treatment. Forty-one percent of patients taking rizatriptan were pain free at 2 h and had no recurrence or need for additional medication, compared to 32.3% of patients on sumatriptan. Rizatriptan was also superior to sumatriptan in terms of the proportions of patients with no nausea, phonophobia or photophobia, and patients with normal function 2 h after treatment intake (p < 0.05). More patients were (completely, very or somewhat) satisfied 2 h after treatment with rizatriptan (73.3%) than 2 h after treatment with sumatriptan (59.0%) (p < or = 0.001). Additionally, 2 h after the dose, more patients found rizatriptan to be very convenient, convenient or somewhat convenient (87.2%) than they did sumatriptan (76.3%) (p < or = 0.001). Both active treatments were well tolerated. The most common side effects with rizatriptan and sumatriptan were nausea (6.6 and 6.9% of patients, respectively), dizziness (6.1 and 5.8%) and somnolence (7.4 and 6.7%).

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1994

Oral sumatriptan in the treatment of recurrent headache.

BACKGROUND: Sumatriptan is effective for the treatment of acute migraine. However, headache may recur in about 30% of patients within 24 hours of successful treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral sumatriptan, 100 mg, in the treatment of headache recurring within 24 hours of achieving headache resolution with subcutaneous sumatriptan, 6 mg. STUDY DESIGN: Subcutaneous sumatriptan was administered for up to 12 migraine attacks in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients whose headache was completely resolved 90 minutes after subcutaneous dosing received either oral sumatriptan or placebo at the onset of recurrent headache. Patients whose headache was not completely resolved were offered rescue medication, including sumatriptan. Patients rated headache severity for 24 hours. SETTING: Fifteen US outpatient clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of patients with relief of recurrent headache and adverse events. RESULTS: Approximately 90% of patients achieved relief of headache (severe or moderate headache reduced to mild or no headache) by 90 minutes after unblinded subcutaneous administration of sumatriptan. Efficacy rates were at least 80% regardless of whether the headache fulfilled the International Headache Society criteria for migraine. About 64% of patients achieved complete relief. Oral sumatriptan, 100 mg, relieved moderate or severe recurrent headache within 4 hours in up to 81% of patients. Oral sumatriptan administered as rescue medication to patients not headache-free did not relieve persistent headache. The incidence, pattern, and severity of adverse events after combined subcutaneous and oral administration of sumatriptan were similar to those after subcutaneous administration alone. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sumatriptan was consistently effective in the treatment of headache recurrence.

Administration, Oral↗